Evidence of rTMS for Motor or Cognitive Stroke Recovery: Hype or Hope?

Proteinopathies and the Neurodegenerative Aftermath of Stroke: Potential Biomarkers and Treatment Targets

Stroke remains a predominant cause of death and long-term disability among adults worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that proteinopathies, characterized by the aggregation and accumulation of misfolded proteins, may play a significant role in the aftermath of stroke and the progression of neurodegenerative disorders. In this review, we explore preclinical and clinical research on key proteinopathies associated with stroke, including tau, Aβ (amyloid-β), TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein 43), α-synuclein, and UCH-L1 (ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1). We focus on their potential as biomarkers for recovery management and as novel treatment targets that may enhance neuronal repair and mitigate secondary neurodegeneration. The involvement of these proteinopathies in various aspects of stroke, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, neuronal damage, and vascular dysfunction, underscores their potential. However, further investigations are essential to validate the clinical utility of these biomarkers, elucidate the mechanisms connecting proteinopathies to poststroke neurodegeneration, and develop targeted interventions. Identifying specific protein signatures associated with stroke outcomes could facilitate the advancement of precision medicine tailored to individual patient needs, significantly enhancing the quality of life for stroke survivors.

A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation

This randomized controlled trial investigates the optimal dosing for post-stroke rehabilitation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Previous studies demonstrated improvements in cognitive and motor functions with specific intensities of rTMS and tDCS, but this trial explores various frequencies and currents to optimize therapeutic outcomes. A total of 128 post-stroke patients (within 1-6 months of stroke) with paraplegia or hemiplegia are recruited. Patients are divided into four groups for both rTMS (n = 49) and tDCS (n = 49): three groups with different stimulation intensities (1 Hz, 5 Hz, 10 Hz for rTMS; 0.5 mA, 1 mA, 2 mA for tDCS) and a sham control group. Along with this, there is a standard therapy group (n = 30) as control. Participants receive 20 min sessions, five days a week, over six weeks. Cognitive and motor assessments are conducted at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months to measure short-term and sustained effects.•Hemodynamically stable post-stroke patients randomized in four groups in rTMS and tDCS each and their baseline cognitive and motor function assessed•Application of the two types of therapy for 6 weeks•Checking improvement of cognitive and motor function and compare the improvement among subgroups of recipient of various frequencies and currents.

Changing genes, cells and networks to reprogram the brain after stroke

Important advances have been made in reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. However, a majority of patients are either ineligible for or do not respond to treatments and continue to have considerable functional deficits. Stroke results in a pathological disruption of the neurovascular unit (NVU) that involves blood-brain barrier leakage, glial activation, neuronal damage and chronic inflammation, all of which create a microenvironment that hinders recovery. Therefore, finding ways to promote central nervous system recovery remains the holy grail of stroke research. Here we propose a conceptual framework to synthesize recent progress in the field, which is currently dispersed and disconnected in the literature. We suggest that stroke recovery requires an integrated reprogramming process throughout the brain that occurs at multiple levels, including changes in gene expression, endogenous cellular transdifferentiation within the NVU, and reorganization of larger-scale neural and social networks.

Additional Effects of Facilitatory Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Inhibitory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Unaffected Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex for Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Background/Objectives: Cerebellum might be one of the targets of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for motor recovery in stroke patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the enhancing effects of rTMS over the cerebellum on inhibitory rTMS for motor recovery in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Methods: Twenty-three patients with subacute ischemic stroke were recruited into this single-blind randomized, controlled study with a blinded observer. The Cr-Cbll group received Cr-Cbll rTMS consisting of continuous theta burst stimulation over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1), a shoulder mobilization exercise, and high-frequency rTMS over the contralesional cerebellum. The Cr-sham group received sham rTMS over the cerebellum instead of high-frequency rTMS. All participants received ten daily sessions for 2 weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) was measured before, immediately after, and 2 months after the intervention. Results: A total of 20 participants (10 in the Cr-Cbll group and 10 in the Cr-sham group) who completed the two-week intervention were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference in general and clinical characteristics between the two groups at baseline. Total and upper extremity scores of FMA showed a significant interaction between time and group (p < 0.05). Each improvement of upper extremity score of FMA immediately and 2 months after the intervention was significantly higher in the Cr-Cbll group than in the Cr-sham group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results demonstrated that rTMS over the cerebellum could have additional effects on inhibitory rTMS over contralesional M1 for improving upper extremity motor function in patients with subacute ischemic stroke.

Reward signals in the motor cortex: from biology to neurotechnology

Over the past decade, research has shown that the primary motor cortex (M1), the brain's main output for movement, also responds to rewards. These reward signals may shape motor output in its final stages, influencing movement invigoration and motor learning. In this Perspective, we highlight the functional roles of M1 reward signals and propose how they could guide advances in neurotechnologies for movement restoration, specifically brain-computer interfaces and non-invasive brain stimulation. Understanding M1 reward signals may open new avenues for enhancing motor control and rehabilitation.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Low Risk of Bias

OBJECTIVES

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in enhancing motor recovery after stroke, but nuances regarding its use, such as the impact of the type and site of stimulation, are not yet established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias to investigate the effect of rTMS on motor recovery after both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three databases were searched systematically for all RCTs reporting comparisons between rTMS (including theta-burst stimulation) and either no stimulation or sham stimulation up to August 19, 2022. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary outcome measures comprised the Action Research Arm Test, Box and Block Test, Modified Ashworth Scale for the wrist, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

RESULTS

A total of 37 articles reporting 48 unique comparisons were included. Pooled mean FMA-UE scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than the control group after intervention (MD = 5.4 [MD = 10.7 after correction of potential publication bias], p < 0.001) and at the last follow-up (MD = 5.2, p = 0.031). On subgroup analysis, the improvements in FMA-UE scores, both after intervention and at the last follow-up, were significant in the acute/subacute stage of stroke (within six months) and for patients with more severe baseline motor impairment. Both contralesional and ipsilesional stimulation yielded significant improvements in FMA-UE at the first assessment after rTMS but not at the last follow-up, while the improvements from bilateral rTMS only achieved statistical significance at the last follow-up. Among the secondary outcome measures, only mRS was significantly improved in the rTMS group after intervention (MD = -0.5, p = 0.013) and at the last follow-up (MD = -0.9, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature supports the use of rTMS for motor recovery after stroke, especially when done within six months and for patients with more severe stroke at baseline. Future studies with larger sample sizes may be helpful in clarifying the potential of rTMS in poststroke rehabilitation.

Noninvasive brain stimulation to improve motor outcomes after stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent developments in noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and applications for improving motor outcomes after stroke. Two promising areas of development relate to deep brain neuromodulation and the use of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) within a prediction tool for predicting upper limb outcome for individual patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Systematic reviews highlight the inconsistent effect sizes of interventional NIBS for motor outcome after stroke, as well as limited evidence supporting the interhemispheric competition model. To improve the therapeutic efficacy of NIBS, studies have leveraged metaplasticity and priming approaches. Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) and low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) are emerging NIBS techniques with potential for modulating deeper brain structures, which may hold promise for stroke neurorehabilitation. Additionally, motor evoked potential (MEP) status obtained with single-pulse TMS is a prognostic biomarker that could be used to tailor NIBS for individual patients.

SUMMARY

Trials of interventional NIBS to improve stroke outcomes may be improved by applying NIBS in a more targeted manner. This could be achieved by taking advantage of NIBS techniques that can be targeted to deeper brain structures, using biomarkers of structural and functional reserve to stratify patients, and recruiting patients in more homogeneous time windows.

Research trends and hotspots of post-stroke upper limb dysfunction: a bibliometric and visualization analysis

Background

The global prevalence of stroke has been increasing. Motor dysfunction is observed in approximately 55 to 75% of stroke patients, with upper limb impairment affecting around 85% of them. Following upper limb dysfunction, the body's recovery time is not only slower compared to the lower limbs, but the restoration of its fine motor skills is significantly more challenging, greatly impacting the daily lives of patients. Consequently, there is an increasing urgency for study on the upper limb function in stroke.

Methods

A search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) database for material published from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2023. We included all relevant literature reports and conducted an analysis of annual publications, countries/regions, institutions, journals, co-cited references, and keywords using the software packages CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix R. Next, we succinctly outlined the research trends and hotspots in post-stroke upper limb dysfunction.

Results

This analysis comprised 1,938 articles from 1,897 institutions, 354 journals, and 53 countries or regions. A yearly rise in the production of publications was noted. The United States is the foremost nation on the issue. Northwestern University has the most amounts of papers compared to all other institutions. The journal Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair is a highly significant publication in this field, with Catherine E. Lang serving as the principal author. The majority of the most-cited references focus on subjects such as the reliability and validity of assessment instruments, RCT of therapies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. The intervention measures primarily comprise three types of high-frequency phrases that are related, as determined by keyword analysis: intelligent rehabilitation, physical factor therapy, and occupational therapy. Current areas of focus in research include randomized clinical trials, neurorehabilitation, and robot-assisted therapy.

Conclusion

Current research has shown a growing interest in studying upper limb function assessment, occupational therapy, physical therapy, robot-assisted therapy, virtual reality, brain-computer interface, telerehabilitation, cortical reorganisation, and neural plasticity. These topics have become popular and are expected to be the focus of future research.

rTMS for Poststroke Pusher Syndrome: A Randomized, Patient-Blinded Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with poststroke pusher syndrome (PS) require longer duration of rehabilitation and more supplemental care after discharge. Effective treatment of PS remains a challenge. The role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for PS has not been examined.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the efficacy of rTMS for patients with poststroke PS in reducing pushing behavior, enhancing motor recovery and improving mobility.

METHODS

A randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded sham-controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Thirty-four eligible patients with poststroke PS were randomly allocated to receive either rTMS or sham rTMS for 2 weeks. Pushing behavior on the Burke lateropulsion scale and scale for contraversive pushing, motor function on Fugl-Meyer assessment scale-motor domain (FMA-m) and mobility on modified Rivermead mobility index were measured at baseline, 1 and 2 weeks after intervention. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant interaction between intervention and time on Burke lateropulsion scale (F = 2.747, P = .076), scale for contraversive pushing (F = 1.583, P = .214), or change of modified Rivermead mobility index (F = 1.183, P = .297). However, a significant interaction between intervention and time was observed for FMA-m (F = 5.464, P = .019). Post hoc comparisons of FMA-m show better improvement in rTMS group with mean differences of 12.7 (95% CI -7.3 to 32.7) and 15.7 (95% CI -4.6 to 36.0) at post-treatment week 1 and week 2 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

rTMS did not demonstrate significant efficacy in improving pushing behavior and mobility in patients with PS. However, rTMS might have potential effect in enhancing motor function for patients with PS.

REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2200058015 at http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojen.aspx) on March 26, 2022.

Effects of different modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate, using a network meta-analysis, the effects of different transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) modalities on improving cognitive function after stroke.

METHODS

Computer searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embass, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were conducted to collect randomized controlled clinical studies on the use of TMS to improve cognitive function in stroke patients, published from the time of database construction to November 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies and 2123 patients were included, comprising five interventions: high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS), low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS), intermittent theta rhythm stimulation (iTBS), sham stimulation (SS), and conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT). A reticulated meta-analysis showed that the rankings of different TMS intervention modalities in terms of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, Mini-Mental State Examination scores (MMSE), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores were: HF-rTMS > LF-rTMS > iTBS > SS > CRT; the rankings of different TMS intervention modalities in terms of the event-related potential P300. amplitude scores were HF-rTMS > LF-rTMS > iTBS > CRT > SS; the rankings of different TMS intervention modalities in terms of the P300 latency scores were: iTBS > HF-rTMS > LF-rTMS > SS > CRT. Subgroup analyses of secondary outcome indicators showed that HF-rTMS significantly improved Rivermead Behavior Memory Test scores and Functional Independence Measurement-Cognitive scores.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency TMS stimulation has a better overall effect on improving cognitive functions and activities of daily living, such as attention and memory in stroke patients.

Multimodal therapy and use of adjunctive therapies to BoNT-A in spasticity management: defining terminology to help enhance spasticity treatment

Spasticity management should be provided within the context of a comprehensive person-centered rehabilitation program. Furthermore, active goal setting for specific spasticity interventions is also important, with a well-established "more is better" approach. It is critical to consider adjunctive therapy and multimodal approaches if patients are not attaining their treatment goals. Often used interchangeably, there may be confusion between the terms adjunctive and multimodal therapy. Yet it is imperative to understand the differences between these approaches to achieve treatment goals in spasticity management. Addition of a secondary pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic treatment to optimize the efficacy of the initial modality, such as adding electrical stimulation or casting to BoNT-A, is considered an adjunctive therapy. Adjunctive therapy is time-specific and requires the added therapy be initiated within a specific period to enhance the primary treatment; usually within 2 weeks. Multimodal therapy is an integrated, patient-centric program of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies utilized in a concurrent/integrated or sequential manner to enhance the overall treatment effect across a variety of spasticity-associated impairments (e.g., neural and non-neural components). Moreover, within a multimodal approach, adjunctive therapy can be used to help enhance the treatment effect of one specific modality. The objectives of this paper are to clarify the differences between adjunctive and multimodal therapies, provide a brief evidence-based review of such approaches, and highlight clinical insights on selecting multimodal and adjunctive therapies in spasticity management.

Global research trends in transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke (1994-2023): promising, yet requiring further practice

Background

Scholars have been committed to investigating stroke rehabilitation strategies over many years. Since its invention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been increasingly employed in contemporary stroke rehabilitation research. Evidence has shown the significant potential of TMS in stroke research and treatment.

Objective

This article reviews the research conducted on the use of TMS in stroke from 1994 to 2023. This study applied bibliometric analysis to delineate the current research landscape and to anticipate future research hotspots.

Method

The study utilized the Web of Science Core Collection to retrieve and acquire literature data. Various software tools, including VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), CiteSpace (version 6.3.R1), Scimago Graphica (version 1.0.36), and WPS (version 11572), were used for data analysis and visualization. The review included analyses of countries, institutions, authors, journals, articles, and keywords.

Results

A total of 3,425 articles were collected. The top three countries in terms of publication output were the United States (953 articles), China (546 articles), and Germany (424 articles). The United States also had the highest citation counts (56,764 citations), followed by Germany (35,211 citations) and the United Kingdom (32,383 citations). The top three institutions based on the number of publications were Harvard University with 138 articles, the University of Auckland with 81 articles, and University College London with 80 articles. The most prolific authors were Abo, Masahiro with 54 articles, Fregni, Felipe with 53 articles, and Pascual-Leone, Alvaro with 50 articles. The top three journals in terms of article count were Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair with 139 articles, Clinical Neurophysiology with 128 articles, and Frontiers in Neurology with 110 articles. The most frequently occurring keywords were stroke (1,275 occurrences), transcranial magnetic stimulation (1,119 occurrences), and rehabilitation (420 occurrences).

Conclusion

The application of TMS in stroke research is rapidly gaining momentum, with the USA leading in publications. Prominent institutions, such as Harvard University and University College London, show potential for collaborative research. The key areas of focus include post-stroke cognitive impairment, aphasia, and dysphagia, which are expected to remain significant hotspots in future research. Future research should involve large-scale, randomized, and controlled trials in these fields. Additionally, identifying more effective combined therapies with rTMS should be a priority.

Using Dual-Target rTMS, Single-Target rTMS, or Sham rTMS on Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND

The clinical application of 10 Hz repetitive transcranil magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains limited despite its demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing cortical excitability and improving cognitive function. The present study used a novel stimulus target [left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex + primary motor cortex] to facilitate the enhancement of cognitive function through the bidirectional promotion of cognitive and motor functions; Methods: Post-stroke cognitive impairment patients (n = 48) were randomly assigned to receive either dual-target, single-target, or sham rTMS for 4 weeks. Before and after 4 weeks of treatment, participants were asked to complete the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), the Trail-making Test (TMT), and the Digital Span Test (DST). In addition, the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in serum were also measured.

RESULTS

After adjusting for pre-intervention (baseline) MoCA scores, the post-intervention MoCA scores varied significantly. After post-hoc analysis, differences existed between the post-treatment scores of the dual-target rTMS group and the sham rTMS group (the experimental group scores were significantly higher), and between those of the dual-target rTMS group and the single-target rTMS group (the dual-target rTMS scores were significantly higher). The serum VEGF levels of the dual-target rTMS group were significantly higher those that of the sham rTMS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study presented data showing that a dual-target rTMS therapy is effective for Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). The stimulation exhibited remarkable efficacy, suggesting that dual-target stimulation (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex+motor cortex (L-DLPFC+M1)) holds promise as a potential target for TMS therapy in individuals with cognitive impairment after stroke.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

No: ChiCTR220066184. Registered 26 November, 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn.

Efficacy of rTMS in treating functional impairment in post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most stroke patients suffer from an imbalance in blood supply, which causes severe brain damage leading to functional deficits in motor, sensory, swallowing, cognitive, emotional, and speech functions. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is thought to restore functions impaired during the stroke process and improve the quality of life of stroke patients. However, the efficacy of rTMS in treating post-stroke function impairment varies significantly. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the number of patients with effective rTMS in treating post-stroke dysfunction.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Screening and full-text review were performed by three investigators. Single-group rate meta-analysis was performed on the extracted data using a random variable model. Then subgroup analyses were performed at the levels of stroke acuity (acute, chronic, or subacute); post-stroke symptoms (including upper and lower limb motor function, dysphagia, depression, aphasia); rTMS stimulation site (affected side, unaffected side); and whether or not it was a combination therapy.

RESULTS

We obtained 8955 search records, and finally 33 studies (2682 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall analysis found that effective strength (ES) of rTMS was 0.53. In addition, we found that the ES of rTMS from acute/subacute/chronic post-stroke was 0.69, 0.45, and 0.52. We also found that the ES of rTMS using high-frequency stimulation was 0.56, while the ES of rTMS using low-frequency stimulation was 0.53. From post-stroke symptoms, we found that the ES of rTMS in sensory aspects, upper limb functional aspects, swallowing function, and aphasia was 0.50, 0.52, 0.51, and 0.54. And from the site of rTMS stimulation, we found that the ES of rTMS applied to the affected side was 0.51, while the ES applied to the unaffected side was 0.54. What's more, we found that the ES of rTMS applied alone was 0.53, while the ES of rTMS applied in conjunction with other therapeutic modalities was 0.53.

CONCLUSIONS

By comparing the results of the data, we recommend rTMS as a treatment option for rehabilitation of functional impairment in patients after stroke. We also recommend that rehabilitation physicians or clinicians use combination therapy as one of the options for patients.

Clinical implementation, barriers, and unmet needs of rTMS and neuro-navigation systems in stroke rehabilitation: a nationwide survey in South Korea

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the implementation, clinical barriers, and unmet needs of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and neuro-navigation systems for stroke rehabilitation.

Design

We employed a nationwide survey via Google Forms (web and mobile) consisting of 36 questions across rTMS and neuro-navigation systems, focusing on their implementation, perceptions, and unmet needs in stroke recovery. The survey targeted physiatrists registered in the Korean Society for Neuro-rehabilitation and in rehabilitation hospitals in South Korea.

Results

Of 1,129 surveys distributed, 122 responses were analyzed. Most respondents acknowledged the effectiveness of rTMS in treating post-stroke impairments; however, they highlighted significant unmet needs in standardized treatment protocols, guidelines, education, device usability, and insurance coverage. Unmet needs for neuro-navigation were also identified; only 7.4% of respondents currently used such systems, despite acknowledging their potential to enhance treatment accuracy. Seventy percent of respondents identified lack of prescription coverage, time and errors in preparation, and device cost as barriers to clinical adoption of neuro-navigation systems.

Conclusion

Despite recognition of the potential of rTMS in stroke rehabilitation, there is a considerable gap between research evidence and clinical practice. Addressing these challenges, establishing standardized protocols, and advancing accessible neuro-navigation systems could significantly enhance the clinical application of rTMS, offering a more personalized, effective treatment modality for stroke recovery.

Facilitating Corticomotor Excitability of the Contralesional Hemisphere Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Improve Upper Limb Motor Recovery from Stroke-A Scoping Review

Upper limb weakness following stroke poses a significant global psychosocial and economic burden. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a potential adjunctive treatment in rehabilitation. However, traditional approaches to rebalance interhemispheric inhibition may not be effective for all patients. The supportive role of the contralesional hemisphere in recovery of upper limb motor function has been supported by animal and clinical studies, particularly for those with severe strokes. This review aims to provide an overview of the facilitation role of the contralesional hemisphere for post-stroke motor recovery. While more studies are required to predict responses and inform the choice of NIBS approach, contralesional facilitation may offer new hope for patients in whom traditional rehabilitation and NIBS approaches have failed.

Effects and safety of high-frequency rTMS in subacute ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

Although high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) has shown benefits in chronic stroke, its application in subacute ischemic stroke remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the effects and safety of lesion-side HF-rTMS in subacute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Prospective lesion-side HF-rTMS was conducted on consecutive ischemic stroke patients within 3 days of onset from February 2019 to June 2022. Inclusion criteria required persistent paralysis (NIHSS score ≥ 1 for at least 7 days). Exclusion criteria comprised cortical infarction, disturbance of consciousness, and age over 80 years. A conventional rehabilitation group meeting the same criteria from June 2015 to January 2019 served as a comparison. We compared the two groups regarding clinical background and outcome. We also evaluated incidence of epilepsy and exacerbation of the NIHSS score in the rTMS group.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients participated, with 50% in the HF-rTMS group. Median time from onset to HF-rTMS initiation was 9 (IQR 7-12) days. A favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 3 months was more frequent in the rTMS group (80% vs. 44%, p = 0.002). HF-rTMS was independently associated with a favorable outcome at 3 months (OR = 5.60, 95% CI = 1.53-20.50, p = 0.009). No cases of epilepsy or exacerbation of NIHSS score were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

HF-rTMS demonstrates potential effectiveness and safety in subacute ischemic stroke patients.

Efficacy of personalized rTMS to enhance upper limb function in subacute stroke patients: a protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled study

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely used therapy to enhance motor deficit in stroke patients. To date, rTMS protocols used in stroke patients are relatively unified. However, as the pathophysiology of stroke is diverse and individual functional deficits are distinctive, more precise application of rTMS is warranted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effects of personalized protocols of rTMS therapy based on the functional reserve of each stroke patient in subacute phase.

Methods

This study will recruit 120 patients with stroke in subacute phase suffering from the upper extremity motor impairment, from five different hospitals in Korea. The participants will be allocated into three different study conditions based on the functional reserve of each participant, measured by the results of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and brain MRI with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) evaluations. The participants of the intervention-group in the three study conditions will receive different protocols of rTMS intervention, a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks: high-frequency rTMS on ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1), high-frequency rTMS on ipsilesional ventral premotor cortex, and high-frequency rTMS on contralesional M1. The participants of the control-group in all three study conditions will receive the same rTMS protocol: low-frequency rTMS on contralesional M1. For outcome measures, the following assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), during-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2), and follow-up (T3) periods: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Box-and-block test, Action Research Arm Test, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, hand grip strength, Functional Ambulatory Category, fractional anisotropy measured by the DTI, and brain network connectivity obtained from MRI. The primary outcome will be the difference of upper limb function, as measured by FMA from T0 to T2. The secondary outcomes will be the differences of other assessments.

Discussion

This study will determine the effects of applying different protocols of rTMS therapy based on the functional reserve of each patient. In addition, this methodology may prove to be more efficient than conventional rTMS protocols. Therefore, effective personalized application of rTMS to stroke patients can be achieved based on their severity, predicted mechanism of motor recovery, or functional reserves.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06270238.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Ameliorate Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment

Post-stroke cognitive impairment is a common and disabling condition with few effective therapeutic options. After stroke, neural reorganization and other neuroplastic processes occur in response to ischemic injury, which can result in clinical improvement through spontaneous recovery. Neuromodulation through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention to augment underlying neuroplasticity in order to improve cognitive function. This form of neuromodulation leverages mechanisms of neuroplasticity post-stroke to optimize neural reorganization and improve function. In this review, we summarize the current state of cognitive neurorehabilitation post-stroke, the practical features of tDCS, its uses in stroke-related cognitive impairment across cognitive domains, and special considerations for the use of tDCS in the post-stroke patient population.

A topical reappreasal on use of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in elderly patients with postischemic stroke statuses - a systematic literature review

Abstract: Introduction: Stroke is a cerebrovascular disease with an impressive potential of disabil-ity, (multi)morbidity, and mortality among elderly patients. After stroke, a series of seque-lae represents a dynamic challenge for rehabilitation, especially for improving motor, cognitive and depressive disorders (1,2). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, painless, neuromodulations and neurostimulation method, which uses electromagnetic induction to administer repeated trains of pulses, with thera-peutic, diagnostic and research purposes (3–5). Method: We performed a systematic literature review of the related literature using a widely international accepted method - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)(6), by searching, filtering, and selecting profile documen-tary material. Combinations/syntaxes of keywords were searched in the following interna-tional databases: Elsevier(7), PubMed(8), PMC(9), PEDro(10), in ISI indexed journals by Web of Knowledge/Science(11) during 1/01/2019-31/12/2021. Besides the 9 articles selected to enhance our related knowledge base we have also used some works freely identified in the literature. Results and discussions: 9 articles satisfied all the previous filtering criteria/ PRISMA steps and were selected for qualitative and detailed analysis. The benefits of rTMS, aiming to bring further insight into the responsiveness of motor deficit, depression, and cognitive impairment of the treatment, and through the favorable dynamic progress of the scores of the quantification scales used: HAMD-17/ HDRS, Hamilton Depression Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assesment; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Interference Test; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; Barthel Index Score; ADL, Activities of Daily Living; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; FIM, Functional Independence Measures. Conclusions: Through this systematic review, we wish to present the perspective of the successful use of rTMS among elderly patients. We also intend for this work to be the start-ing point in the development of a doctoral study, which will include post-stroke sequelae, such as motor deficits, depressive and cognitive disorders, and through which we will strengthen scientific confidence in the tolerability and effectiveness of this type of stimula-tion for this segment of age.

Efficacy of rTMS for poststroke epilepsy and its effects on patients' cognitive function and depressive status

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy and the effect of rTMS on patients' cognitive function and depressive status.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-one poststroke epilepsy patients with mild cognitive impairment and depressive status admitted to the Department of Neurology of the Second People's Hospital of Nanning from January 1, 2017, to April 31, 2023, were selected and divided into the rTMS treatment group (treated group) and the control group. MMSE scores and HAMD scores were recorded before and after treatment. The frequency of EEG spiky waves recorded before and after treatment within 24 h and the frequency of any clinical seizure form (the number of clinical seizures within 1 month after treatment) and changes in observed indices before and after treatment were calculated. The differences between the data of the two groups were analyzed, to further assess the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy and the rTMS' effects on cognition and depression.

RESULTS

Compared with drug treatment alone, rTMS significantly decreased clinical seizures and epileptiform discharges after stroke, especially in patients with lesions in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes. Compared with drug treatment alone, rTMS treatment can effectively reduce cognitive impairment and mood disorders, such as depression, especially for patients with lesions in the frontal and temporal lobes. The results of this experiment suggest that rTMS treatment does not increase adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

rTMS reduces clinical seizures while improving cognitive impairment and depression in patients with epilepsy. Therefore, we suggest that low-frequency rTMS can be used as an adjunctive treatment for patients with epilepsy and provide some ideas and references for the treatment of epilepsy with cognitive impairment and depression.

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-Stroke Comorbid Cognitive Impairment and Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

There are currently no uniform treatments for post-stroke comorbid cognitive impairment and depression (PSCCID).

Objective

To verify whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can improve PSCCID symptoms and explore the underlying roles of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).

Methods

Thirty PSCCID patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive 4 weeks of rTMS (intervention group) or sham rTMS (control group) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). rs-fMRI was acquired to analyze the functional plasticity of brain regions at baseline and immediately after the last intervention.

Results

Cognition, depression status, and neural electrophysiology were improved in both intervention and control groups after treatment (p = 0.015-0.042), and the intervention group had more significant improvement than the control group. Analysis of functional connectivities (FCs) within the default mood network (DMN) showed that the connection strength of the left temporal pole/left parahippocampal cortex and right lateral temporal cortex/right retrosplenial cortex in the intervention group were enhanced compared with its pre-intervention and that in the control group after treatment (p < 0.05), and the both FC values were positively correlated with MMSE scores (p < 0.001). The intervention group had stronger FCs within the DMN compared with the control group after treatment, and some of the enhanced FCs were correlated with the P300 latency and amplitude.

Conclusions

rTMS over the left DLPFC is an effective treatment for improving both cognitive impairment and depression among patients with PSCCID. The enhanced FCs within the DMN may serve as a compensatory functional recombination to promote clinical recovery.