Bronchial responsiveness is not increased by bronchoalveolar and bronchial lavage performed after allergen challenge

Investigative bronchoprovocation and bronchoscopy in airway diseases

RATIONALE

Basic and clinical research strategies used for many lung diseases have depended on volunteer subjects undergoing bronchoscopy to establish access to the airways to collect biological specimens and tissue, perhaps with added bronchoprovocation in asthma syndromes. These procedures have yielded a wealth of important scientific information. Since the last critical review more than a decade ago, some of the techniques and applications have changed, and untoward events have occurred, raising safety concerns and increasing institutional review scrutiny.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

To reappraise these investigational methods in the context of current knowledge, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health convened a working group to review these procedures used for airway disease research, emphasizing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

MAIN RESULTS

The group reaffirmed the scientific importance of investigative bronchoscopy and bronchoprovocation, even as less invasive technologies evolve. The group also considered the safety of bronchoscopy and bronchoprovocation with methacholine and antigen to be acceptable for volunteer subjects and patients, but stressed the need to monitor this closely and to emphasize proper training of participating medical research personnel. Issues were raised about vulnerable volunteers, especially children who need surrogates for informed consent.

CONCLUSION

This review of investigative bronchoscopy and bronchoprovocation could serve as the basis for future guidelines for the use of these procedures in the United States.

TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta are not essential to the inflammatory response in LPS-induced airway disease

To determine the role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1 beta in the lower respiratory tract inflammatory response after inhalation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), we conducted inhalation exposure studies in mice lacking expression of TNF-alpha and/or IL-1 receptor type 1 and in mice with functional blockade of these cytokines using adenoviral vector delivery of soluble receptors to one or both cytokines. Alterations in airway physiology were assessed by pulmonary function testing before and immediately after 4 h of LPS exposure, and the cellular inflammatory response was measured by whole lung lavage and assessment of inflammatory cytokine protein and mRNA expression. Airway resistance after LPS exposure was similarly increased in all groups of mice without evidence that blockade of either or both cytokines was protective from this response. Additionally, all groups of mice demonstrated significant increases in lung lavage fluid cellularity with a complete shift in the population of cells to a predominantly neutrophilic infiltrate as well as elevation in inflammatory cytokine protein and mRNA levels. There were no significant differences between the groups in measures of lung inflammation. These results indicate that TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta do not appear to have an essential role in mediating the physiological or inflammatory response to inhaled LPS.

Compartmentalization of the inflammatory response to inhaled grain dust

Interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and the secreted form of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (sIL-1RA) are involved in the inflammatory response to inhaled grain dust. Previously, we found considerable production of these cytokines in the lower respiratory tract of workers exposed by inhalation to aqueous extracts of corn dust extract. Alveolar macrophages (AM) have long been considered the cell type responsible for producing these cytokines, and only recently has it been realized that airway epithelial cells may also be involved in cytokine production. In order to determine whether airway epithelia are involved in the inflammatory response to inhaled corn dust extract and to compare the magnitude of response of bronchial epithelial cells (BE) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells, we used the reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) technique in a semiquantitative manner to evaluate the concentration of IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha, and sIL-1RA. Alveolar cells were obtained by BAL, and BE were obtained by endobronchial brush biopsy from 15 grain handlers 6 h after experimental inhalation of saline or an aqueous corn dust extract. After inhalation of saline, BE expressed low but detectable levels of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1beta (> 1 complementary DNA [cDNA] molecule/cell). After inhalation of corn dust extract, the expression of messenger RNA (mRNA) for IL-1beta and IL-8 in the BE were significantly increased, whereas no change was seen in IL-6, sIL-1RA, and TNF-alpha mRNA expression. Comparing cytokine mRNA levels in BE and BAL cells from the same subjects after inhalation of corn dust extract, BE and BAL cells expressed equivalent amounts of IL-8 mRNA; IL-1beta was 11-fold higher in BAL cells; and TNF-alpha and sIL-1RA were expressed exclusively by BAL cells. Immunostaining for the cytokines in BAL cells showed cytokine protein expression in AMs but not in polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs). On the other hand, sIL-1RA was strongly expressed in both AMs and PMNs. Analysis of cytokine protein levels in endobronchial lavage (EBL) fluid demonstrated that only IL-8 was released in detectable amounts into the airway lumen, whereas all the other cytokines of interest were exclusively found in the BAL fluid. Thus, within 6 h after inhalation exposure to corn dust extract, BE appear to contribute to airway inflammation by producing IL-8. AMs are responsible for most of the IL-1beta and IL-6 production in the alveolar region, whereas AMs and PMNs both produce sIL-1RA. Our findings suggest that the inflammatory response to inhaled grain dust is compartmentalized, involving specific mediators of inflammation released by macrophages, neutrophils, and airway epithelial cells.

Bronchoalveolar lavage causes decrease in PaO2, increase in (A-a) gradient value and bronchoconstriction in asthmatics

The aims of this study were to (1) record the changes of (arterial oxygen partial pressure) PaO2, (arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure) PaCO2, (percentage saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen in arterial blood) SaO2 and alveolar-arterial (A-a) oxygen gradiant resulting from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in asthmatic and normal subjects; (2) measure changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), vital capacity forced (FVC) associated with BAL; and (3) assess possible predictive factors for the degree of hypoxaemia and impairment of spirometry resulting from BAL. Bronchoscopy and BAL (150 ml) were performed in 24 asthmatics and 15 healthy subjects. Serial arterial blood samples (radial artery) were obtained in all subjects: T1 and before T2 after local anaesthesia; T3 at end of bronchoscopy; T4 after BAL and 5 min, 15 min, 1 h, 2 h, 8 h and 24 h (T5-T10) after the procedure, FEV1 and FVC were measured immediately before and 5 min afer bronchoscopy. Baseline PaO2 was lower in asthmatics (10.2 +/- 0.8 kPa) than in healthy subjects (10.8 +/- 0.8). Both groups showed a significant decrease in PaO2, and a significant widening in (A-a) oxygen tension gradiant at T3-9, with respect to T1 (P < 0.05). PaO2 reached a significantly lower value in asthmatics (7.1 +/- 0.6 kPa) than in HS (7.7 +/- 0.5; P < 0.05). In asthmatics, FEV1, FVC and the ratio FEV1/FVC decreased significantly after BAL (P < 0.001). In healthy subjects, FEV1 and FVC decreased significantly (P < 0.001), whereas FEV1/FVC did not. The fall in FEV1 after BAL was significantly greater in asthmatics (32.4 +/- 10.0%) than in healthy subjects (17.7 +/- 4.6; P < 0.001). Severity of asthma, basline FEV1 or initial PaO2 did not predict the degree of hypoxaemia or the fall of FEV1. It is concluded that BAL causes more severe hypoxaemia and a greater decrease in FEV1 in asthmatics compared to healthy subjects, strongly supporting the recommendation of special caution and careful monitoring when BAL is undertaken in asthmatics.

Bronchoalveolar lavage in asthma research

A great deal of information about the pathophysiology of asthma and its treatment have been obtained through the use of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), especially in combination with airway biopsies. The introduction of highly sophisticated methods for examining BAL aspirate, including fluorocein activated cell scanning (FACS) analysis and molecular biology techniques has emphasized the potential power of this method of airway investigation. For those contemplating the use of BAL in asthma research programmes, we hope that this review will provide a useful insight into the current state of knowledge about the technique and its application, and that it will provide a solid platform for study design.

BAL neutrophilia in asthmatic patients. A by-product of eosinophil recruitment?

Although neutrophil number may be increased in the airways of patients with asthma, its pathogenetic role in this disorder remains unclear. We evaluated BAL of 8 normal control subjects, 30 +/- 2 years of age, and 24 patients with mild asthma: 17 patients with allergic asthma, 24 +/- 1 years of age, and 7 patients with nonallergic asthma, 30 +/- 1 years of age. The BAL of asthmatic patients showed increased numbers of neutrophils (p < 0.01), eosinophils (p < 0.01), and ciliated epithelial cells (p < 0.05) and increased concentrations of myeloperoxidase (MPO) (p < 0.01) compared with control subjects. Positive correlations were observed between the number of BAL neutrophils and eosinophils (Rs = 0.780, p < 0.0001) and between BAL neutrophil numbers and BAL MPO levels (Rs = 0.40, p < 0.05). No correlations were found between the following: (1) BAL eosinophils or neutrophils and BAL epithelial cells (p > 0.05, each comparison); (2) BAL neutrophils or eosinophils and log Pd15 methacholine (MCh) (p > 0.05, each comparison); or (3) BAL epithelial cells or log Pd15 MCh and BAL MPO (p > 0.05, each comparison). Dividing the patient population into two groups, allergic asthmatics and nonallergic asthmatics, similar BAL neutrophil, eosinophil, and epithelial cell numbers and similar MPO levels were found (p > 0.05, each comparison). In addition, the correlations between BAL neutrophils and eosinophils showed similar significance in the two patient subgroups (p > 0.05, each comparison). These results suggest that, both in allergic and nonallergic asthma, airway recruitment and activation of neutrophils occur as does parallel eosinophil migration. However, airway neutrophils do not seem to contribute significantly to epithelial cell injury or to airway hyperresponsiveness in the steady state.

Safety of fibreoptic bronchoscopy in asthmatic and control subjects and effect on asthma control over two weeks

BACKGROUND

Concerns remain about the safety of bronchoscopy in asthma and there are few data on the effect of this procedure on asthma control in the days or weeks following bronchoscopy.

METHODS

In an initial study of bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsies in asthmatic and control subjects, data on peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) collected prospectively before and after the procedure were available from 21 of the 29 asthmatic subjects studied. These showed a median 23% fall in PEFR from baseline after bronchoscopy (range 3-58%). To determine whether this fall in PEFR following bronchoscopy reflected bronchospasm or the effect of sedation, PEFR and spirometric tests were performed during the two hours following bronchoscopy in a further study of 15 symptomatic asthmatic subjects and 20 non-asthmatic controls. To examine the effect on asthma control, asthmatic patients recorded PEFR, symptom scores, and medication use for two weeks before and after bronchoscopy.

RESULTS

After bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsies there was no difference between the median maximal fall in either PEFR or arterial oxygen saturation between the 15 asthmatic patients (10.4% and 4%, respectively) and 20 controls (12% and 3%). Moreover, there were no significant changes in PEFR, symptom score, or medication use by the asthmatic subjects in the two weeks after bronchoscopy when compared with the two weeks before bronchoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is well tolerated in asthmatic subjects. Falls in PEFR in both asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects after bronchial biopsy may reflect the effects of sedation rather than bronchospasm. Additional bronchoalveolar lavage may cause bronchoconstriction. Careful monitoring is therefore essential. Peak flow monitoring up to two weeks after bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsy revealed no delayed effects on asthma control.

Bronchial responsiveness is not always increased after allergen challenge

Increased bronchial responsiveness has been reported at various time points following allergen challenge (AC), and may be related to the magnitude of the late response (LAR). We have studied 20 mild asthmatics, who were known to develop a late asthmatic response to inhalation of house dust mite extract (fall of > 15% from post-diluent baseline FEV1 from 2 to 7h after AC). The provocation concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 FEV1) was measured before and 24 h after challenge with house dust mite extract (HDM). The mean (SEM) change in log(PC20) was 0.08 (0.09) mg ml-1, and was not significant (P = 0.38; paired t-test). The change in PC20 for each subject was not significantly correlated with the size of LAR (r = -0.33; P > 0.05), but was significantly correlated with the absolute change from baseline FEV1 at 24 h (r = 0.67; P < 0.01). Our subjects had a high baseline responsiveness, when compared with previous studies. We suggest they may have been approaching a maximally responsive state prior to study, and allergen challenge may have had little effect in further increasing responsiveness. Exposure to allergen in late responders is not necessarily followed by an increase in non-specific bronchial responsiveness.

Lung function and bronchial responsiveness after bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsy performed without premedication in stable asthmatic subjects

We evaluated tolerance, safety, and effects on lung function and bronchial responsiveness of BAL (4 x 50 ml) combined with BB (three to five specimens) performed without premedication in 13 mild and stable asthmatics and eight healthy volunteers. All subjects tolerated bronchoscopy procedures well and without serious side effects. During procedures, no supplemental oxygen was administered and no ECG abnormalities were noted. The PEFR was measured before and immediately after bronchoscopy and at 5-min intervals up until recovery. The maximal percentage fall in PEFR after bronchoscopy was significantly greater in asthmatics (23.1 +/- 13.9 percent) compared to normal subjects (7.8 +/- 8.2 percent, p less than 0.01). Changes in PEFR returned to baseline values within 120 min in all asthmatics. The tcPO2 was recorded at baseline, during and after bronchoscopy. In both groups, a significant change in tcPO2 was measured during the infusion of BAL aliquots, and persisted throughout the procedure. A significant difference in asthmatics compared to healthy subjects was evident during BB and at the end of the procedure (p less than 0.05). In asthmatics, M challenge was performed on three different days over a three-week period prior to bronchoscopy, and was repeated at intervals of 2, 6, and 24 h following procedure. The PC20 M values measured before bronchoscopy were found to have a very high reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). The PC20 values measured during experiment times after bronchoscopy were not significantly different from baseline values. These data demonstrate that in mild and stable asthmatics, BAL combined with BB can be safely performed following administration of only local anesthesia. In carefully selected asthmatic subjects, transient bronchoconstriction and a lowering of oxygen tension can be induced by BAL and BB, whereas changes in bronchial responsiveness are more unlikely to occur.

Effects of ozone on lung mechanics and cyclooxygenase metabolites in dogs

To determine if acute exposure to ozone can cause changes in the production of cyclooxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid (AA) in the lung which are associated with changes in lung mechanics, we exposed mongrel dogs to 0.5 ppm ozone for two hours. We measured pulmonary resistance (RL) and dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and obtained methacholine dose response curves and bronchoalveolar lavagate (BAL) before and after the exposures. We calculated the provocative dose of methacholine necessary to increase RL 50% (PD50) and analyzed the BAL for four cyclooxygenase metabolites of AA: a stable hydrolysis product of prostacyclin, 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha (6-keto-PgF1 alpha); prostaglandin E2 (PgE2); a stable hydrolysis product of thromboxane A2, thromboxane B2 (TxB2); and prostaglandin F2 alpha (PgF2 alpha). Following ozone exposure, RL increased from 4.75 +/- 1.06 to 6.08 +/- 1.3 cm H2O/L/sec (SEM) (p less than 0.05), Cdyn decreased from 0.0348 +/- 0.0109 TO .0217 +/- .0101 L/cm H2O (p less than 0.05), and PD50 decreased from 4.32 +/- 2.41 to 0.81 +/- 0.49 mg/cc (p less than 0.05). The baseline metabolite levels were as follows: 6-keto PgF1 alpha: 96.1 +/- 28.8 pg/ml; PgE2: 395.8 +/- 67.1 pg/ml; TxB2: 48.5 +/- 11.1 pg/ml; PgF2 alpha: 101.5 +/- 22.6 pg/ml. Ozone had no effect on any of these prostanoids. These studies quantify the magnitude of cyclooxygenase products of AA metabolism in BAL from dog lungs and demonstrate that changes in their levels are not prerequisites for ozone-induced changes in lung mechanics or airway reactivity.