Effects of inhaled budesonide on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation

Evaluation of the reproducibility of responses to nasal allergen challenge and effects of inhaled nasal corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Similar immune responses in the nasal and bronchial mucosa implies that nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is a suitable early phase experimental model for drug development targeting allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. We assessed NAC reproducibility and the effects of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) on symptoms, physiology, and inflammatory mediators.

METHODS

20 participants with mild atopic asthma and AR underwent three single blinded nasal challenges each separated by three weeks (NCT03431961). Cohort A (n = 10) underwent a control saline challenge, followed by two allergen challenges. Cohort B (n = 10) underwent a NAC with no treatment intervention, followed by NAC with 14 days pre-treatment with saline nasal spray (placebo), then NAC with 14 days pre-treatment with INCS (220 μg triamcinolone acetonide twice daily). Nasosorption, nasal lavage, blood samples, forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were collected up to 24 h after NAC. Total and active tryptase were measured as early-phase allergy biomarkers (≤30 min) and IL-13 and eosinophil cell counts as late-phase allergy biomarkers (3-7 h) in serum and nasal samples. Period-period reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sample size estimates were performed using effect sizes measured after INCS.

RESULTS

NAC significantly induced acute increases in nasosorption tryptase and TNSS and reduced PNIF, and induced late increases in nasosorption IL-13 with sustained reductions in PNIF. Reproducibility across NACs varied for symptoms and biomarkers, with total tryptase 5 min post NAC having the highest reproducibility (ICC = 0.91). Treatment with INCS inhibited NAC-induced IL-13 while blunting changes in TNSS and PNIF. For a similar crossover study, 7 participants per treatment arm are needed to detect treatment effects comparable to INCS for TNSS.

CONCLUSION

NAC-induced biomarkers and symptoms are reproducible and responsive to INCS. NAC is suitable for assessing pharmacodynamic activity and proof of mechanism for drugs targeting allergic inflammation.

EAACI position paper on the clinical use of the bronchial allergen challenge: Unmet needs and research priorities

Allergic asthma (AA) is a common asthma phenotype, and its diagnosis requires both the demonstration of IgE-sensitization to aeroallergens and the causative role of this sensitization as a major driver of asthma symptoms. Therefore, a bronchial allergen challenge (BAC) would be occasionally required to identify AA patients among atopic asthmatics. Nevertheless, BAC is usually considered a research tool only, with existing protocols being tailored to mild asthmatics and research needs (eg long washout period for inhaled corticosteroids). Consequently, existing BAC protocols are not designed to be performed in moderate-to-severe asthmatics or in clinical practice. The correct diagnosis of AA might help select patients for immunomodulatory therapies. Allergen sublingual immunotherapy is now registered and recommended for controlled or partially controlled patients with house dust mite-driven AA and with FEV1 ≥ 70%. Allergen avoidance is costly and difficult to implement for the management of AA, so the proper selection of patients is also beneficial. In this position paper, the EAACI Task Force proposes a methodology for clinical BAC that would need to be validated in future studies. The clinical implementation of BAC could ultimately translate into a better phenotyping of asthmatics in real life, and into a more accurate selection of patients for long-term and costly management pathways.

Allergen Provocation Tests in Respiratory Research: Building on 50 Years of Experience

Allergen provocation test is an established model of allergic airway diseases, including asthma and allergic rhinitis, allowing the study of allergen-induced changes in respiratory physiology and inflammatory mechanisms in sensitised individuals as well as their associations. In the upper airways, allergen challenge is focused on the clinical and pathophysiological sequelae of the early allergic response and applied both as a diagnostic tool and in research settings. In contrast, the bronchial allergen challenge has almost exclusively served as a research tool in specialised research settings with a focus on the late asthmatic response and the underlying type 2 inflammation. The allergen-induced late asthmatic response is also characterised by prolonged airway narrowing, increased non-specific airway hyperresponsiveness and features of airway remodelling including the small airways, and hence, allows the study of several key mechanisms and features of asthma. In line with these characteristics, the allergen challenge has served as a valued tool to study the crosstalk of the upper and lower airways and in proof of mechanism studies of drug development. In recent years, several new insights into respiratory phenotypes and endotypes including the involvement of the upper and small airways, innovative biomarker sampling methods and detection techniques, refined lung function testing as well as targeted treatment options, further shaped the applicability of the allergen provocation test in precision medicine. These topics, along with descriptions of subject populations and safety, in line with the updated GINA2021, will be addressed in this paper.

Allergen bronchoprovocation test: an important research tool supporting precision medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergen bronchoprovocation test (ABT) has been used to study asthma pathophysiology and as a disease-modelling tool to assess the properties and efficacy of new asthma drugs. In view of the complexity and heterogeneity of asthma, which has driven the definition of several phenotypes and endotypes, we aim to discuss the role of ABT in the era of precision medicine and provide guidance for clinicians how to interpret and use available data to understand the implications for the benefits of asthma treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we summarize background knowledge and applications of ABT and provide an update with recent publications on this topic. In the past years, several studies have been published on ABT in combination with non-invasive and invasive airway samplings and innovative detection techniques allowing to study several inflammatory mechanisms linked to Th2-pathway and allergen-induced pathophysiology throughout the airways.

SUMMARY

ABT is a valuable research tool, which has strongly contributed to precision medicine by helping to define allergen-triggered key inflammatory pathways and airway pathophysiology, and thus helped to shape our understanding of allergen-driven asthma phenotypes and endotypes. In addition, ABT has been instrumental to assess the interactions and effects of new-targeted asthma treatments along these pathways.

Advances with glucocorticoids in the treatment of asthma: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is one of the most frequent chronic diseases all over the world. Glucocorticoids (GCs), both inhaled (ICSs) and oral (OCSs), are the most effective treatment in asthma because they control symptoms and prevent exacerbations.

AREAS COVERED

The present article reviews the new therapeutic indications of GCs for the treatment of asthma and focuses on new molecules and safety issues.

EXPERT OPINION

Most patients with asthma benefit from corticosteroid-based treatments. Side effects are mainly due to prolonged use of oral GCs, while they are minor with inhaled GCs. Interesting insights come from the new ICSs, which are characterized by lower oral bioavailability and higher lipophilicity and are more effective with less side effects. Recent trials have shown the efficacy of early use of ICSs in mild asthma. Furthermore, the possibility to prescribe targeted therapies using specific biomarkers in steroid-sensitive asthma can reduce doses and duration of treatment, while biological agents should be reserved for non-responding patients. All this evidence confirm the need to continue on the path toward precision medicine, in which the treatments are based on clinical and molecular traits.

An evaluation of roflumilast and PDE4 inhibitors with a focus on the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common chronic airway inflammatory disease characterized by diverse inflammatory events leading to airway hyperresponsiveness and reversible airflow obstruction. Corticosteroids have been the mainstay for asthma treatment due to their broad anti-inflammatory actions; however, other medications such as phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors also demonstrate anti-inflammatory activity in the airways.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes tissue expression of phosphodiesterase 4 in the airways, the different phosphodiesterase 4 isoenzymes identified, and the anti-inflammatory activities of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibition in asthma and related findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors further review clinical trials demonstrating that drugs such as roflumilast have an excellent safety profile and efficacy in patients with asthma and COPD.

EXPERT OPINION

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors suppress the activity of immune cells, an effect similar to corticosteroids although by acting through different anti-inflammatory pathways and uniquely blocking neutrophilic inflammation. Roflumilast and other phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors have been shown to provide additive protection in asthma when added to corticosteroid and anti-leukotriene treatment. Developmental drugs with dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibition are thought to be able to provide bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory activities and will consequently be pushed forward in their clinical development for the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Realising the potential of various inhaled airway challenge agents through improved delivery to the lungs

Inhaled airway challenges provoke bronchoconstriction in susceptible subjects and are a pivotal tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive lung diseases, both in the clinic and in the development of new respiratory medicines. This article reviews the main challenge agents that are in use today (methacholine, mannitol, adenosine, allergens, endotoxin) and emphasises the importance of controlling how these agents are administered. There is a danger that the optimal value of these challenge agents may not be realised due to suboptimal inhaled delivery; thus considerations for effective and reproducible challenge delivery are provided. This article seeks to increase awareness of the importance of precise delivery of inhaled agents used to challenge the airways for diagnosis and research, and is intended as a stepping stone towards much-needed standardisation and harmonisation in the administration of inhaled airway challenge agents.

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests

This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.

Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma: Measurement and Clinical Relevance

Airway hyperresponsiveness is a characteristic feature of asthma, and its measurement is an important tool in its diagnosis. With a few caveats, methacholine bronchial provocation by a 2-minute tidal breathing method is highly sensitive; a negative test result (PC₂₀ > 16 mg/mL, PD₂₀ > 400 μg) rules out current asthma with reasonable certainty. A PC₂₀ value of less than 1 mg/mL/PD₂₀ value of less than 25 μg is highly specific (ie, diagnostic) but quite insensitive for asthma. For accurate interpretation of the test results, it is important to control and standardize technical factors that have an impact on nebulizer performance. In addition to its utility to relate symptoms such as cough, wheeze, and shortness of breath to variable airflow obstruction (ie, to diagnose current asthma), the test is useful to make a number of other clinical assessments. These include (1) evaluation of patients with occupational asthma, (2) evaluation of patients with exercise-induced respiratory symptoms, (3) evaluation of novel asthma medications, (4) evaluation of relative potency of inhaled bronchodilators, (5) as a biomarker to adjust anti-inflammatory therapy to improve clinical outcomes, and (6) in the evaluation of patients with severe asthma to rule out masqueraders such as laryngeal dysfunction. The actual mechanism of altered smooth muscle behavior in asthma that is assessed by direct (eg, methacholine) or indirect (eg, allergen) bronchial provocation remains one of the most fundamental questions related to asthma that needs to be determined. The test is underutilized in clinical practice.

Allergen-induced airway responses

Environmental allergens are an important cause of asthma and can contribute to loss of asthma control and exacerbations. Allergen inhalation challenge has been a useful clinical model to examine the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation. Allergen bronchoconstrictor responses are the early response, which reaches a maximum within 30 min and resolves by 1-3 h, and late responses, when bronchoconstriction recurs after 3-4 h and reaches a maximum over 6-12 h. Late responses are followed by an increase in airway hyperresponsiveness. These responses occur when IgE on mast cells is cross-linked by an allergen, causing degranulation and the release of histamine, neutral proteases and chemotactic factors, and the production of newly formed mediators, such as cysteinyl leukotrienes and prostaglandin D2. Allergen-induced airway inflammation consists of an increase in airway eosinophils, basophils and, less consistently, neutrophils. These responses are mediated by the trafficking and activation of myeloid dendritic cells into the airways, probably as a result of the release of epithelial cell-derived thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from type 2 helper T-cells. Allergen inhalation challenge has also been a widely used model to study potential new therapies for asthma and has an excellent negative predictive value for this purpose.

Therapeutic novelties of inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators in asthma

Orally inhaled agents are a key therapeutic class for treatment of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma thus representing the first-line therapy and bronchodilators complement the effects of ICSs. A significant body of evidence indicates that addition of a β2-agonist to ICS therapy is more effective than increasing the dose of ICS monotherapy. In this paper, pharmacological features of available ICSs and bronchodilators will be reviewed with a focus on fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate combination which represents the one of the most powerful ICS acting together with the most rapid active LABA.

The effects of an epithelial barrier protective cationic aerosol on allergen-induced airway inflammation in asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Inhaled cationic airway lining modulator (iCALM) is a cationic aerosol therapy comprised of 1.29% calcium chloride dissolved in 0.9% isotonic saline that enhances the biophysical barrier function of the airway lining fluid and primes the host defense response. It's ability to attenuate bronchitis caused by inhaled particles was investigated using an allergen-inhalation model in a proof-of-concept study. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of 6 mild atopic steroid-naïve asthmatic subjects, 3 doses of iCALM were well tolerated and they attenuated allergen-induced increase in sputum eosinophils, and levels of IL-5, MCP-1 and eotaxin. This study provides an opportunity to investigate the role of enhancing epithelial barrier to decrease airway inflammation provoked by inhaled particles in a variety of airway diseases.

A nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonist inhibits allergen-induced late asthmatic responses

RATIONALE

Effective antiinflammatory therapies are needed for the treatment of asthma, but preferably without the systemic adverse effects of glucocorticosteroids.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of an inhaled nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonist, AZD5423, on allergen-induced responses.

METHODS

Twenty subjects with mild allergic asthma were randomized to receive 7 days of treatment with nebulized AZD5423 (75 or 300 μg) once daily, budesonide 200 μg twice daily via Turbuhaler, or placebo in a double-blind, four-period, crossover design study. Allergen challenge was performed on Day 6.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

FEV1 was measured repeatedly for 7 hours after allergen challenge for early and late asthmatic responses. Sputum inflammatory cells was measured before and at 7 and 24 hours after allergen challenge, and methacholine airway responsiveness was measured before and 24 hours after allergen challenge. AZD5423 significantly attenuated the fall in FEV1 during the late asthmatic response (both doses led to an 8.7% fall) versus placebo (14% fall) (P < 0.05) with no effect of budesonide (12.5% fall) versus placebo (P > 0.05). There was no effect on the fall in FEV1 during early asthmatic response. AZD5423 300 and 75 μg significantly attenuated allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia by 63 and 61% at 7 hours, respectively, and by 46 and 34% at 24 hours after allergen challenge, respectively, versus placebo (all P < 0.05). Budesonide did not reduce allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia versus placebo. AZD5423 at 300 μg significantly attenuated allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness at 24 hours after allergen challenge versus placebo (P < 0.05). Both doses of AZD5423 were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day treatment with inhalation of the nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonist AZD5423 effectively reduced allergen-induced responses in subjects with mild allergic asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01225549).

Inhaled allergen bronchoprovocation tests

The allergen bronchoprovocation test is a long-standing exacerbation model of allergic asthma that can induce several clinical and pathophysiologic features of asthma in sensitized subjects. Standardized allergen challenge is primarily a research tool, and when properly conducted by qualified and experienced investigators, it is safe and highly reproducible. In combination with validated airway sampling and sensitive detection techniques, allergen challenge allows the study of several features of the physiology of mainly TH2 cell-driven asthma in relation to the kinetics of the underlying airway pathology occurring during the allergen-induced late response. Furthermore, given the small within-subject variability in allergen-induced airway responses, allergen challenge offers an adequate disease model for the evaluation of new (targeted) controller therapies for asthma in a limited number of subjects. In proof-of-efficacy studies thus far, allergen challenge showed a fair positive predicted value and an excellent negative predictive value for the actual clinical efficacy of new antiasthma therapies, underscoring its important role in early drug development. In this review we provide recommendations on challenge methods, response measurements, sample size, safety, and harmonization for future applications.

Modulation of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction by fluticasone furoate and vilanterol alone or in combination

BACKGROUND

This placebo-controlled study assessed the effects of the once-daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone furoate (FF) and long-acting beta(2) -agonist (LABA) vilanterol (VI) on early and late asthmatic responses (EAR/LAR) and airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR).

METHODS

Patients (n = 27) were randomized to FF (100 μg), VI (25 μg), FF/VI (100/25 μg), and placebo for 21 days (four periods). Allergen challenge was performed 1 h post-dose on day 21. AHR was assessed on day 22 using methacholine.

RESULTS

Allergen challenge caused an early change (0-2 h) in minimum forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) of -1.091 l (95% CI: -1.344; -0.837) following placebo therapy; changes were -0.955 l (-1.209; -0.702), -0.826 l (-1.070; -0.581), and -0.614 l (-0.858; -0.370) following VI, FF, or FF/VI therapy, respectively. Treatment differences were significant for all comparisons between therapies. Mean changes in 0-2 h %FEV(1) were as follows: -28.05 (placebo), -23.10 (VI), -22.33 (FF), and -16.10 (FF/VI). Following placebo, the late change (4-10 h) in weighted mean FEV(1) was -0.466 l (-0.589; -0.343) and -0.298 l (-0.415; -0.181) after VI, and was +0.018 l with both FF/VI (-0.089; 0.124) and FF (-0.089; 0.125). Treatment differences were significant for all comparisons between therapies except FF/VI vs FF. Mean changes in 4-10 h %FEV(1) were as follows: -21.08 (placebo), -14.30 (VI), -5.02 (FF), and -5.83 (FF/VI). AHR 24 h after allergen challenge was significantly reduced with FF/VI and FF vs placebo, and FF/VI was superior to either component.

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with FF/VI provides additive protection from the EAR relative to its components, significant protection over VI alone from the LAR, and confers sustained protection from hyper-responsiveness 24 h post-dose.

The pharmacological modulation of allergen-induced asthma

Aeroallergens are the most common triggers for the development of asthma. Recent birth cohort studies have identified viral infections occurring against a background of aeroallergen sensitization as a potent risk factor for initiation of asthma. Viral infection enhances immunopathogenic potential of pre-existing inhalant allergy via modulating airway mucosal dendritic cells. By using an allergen inhalation challenge clinical model, studies have shown that the late asthma response (LAR) is associated with more pronounced allergen-induced airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. The degree of airway eosinophilia, regulated by bone marrow progenitor cells and interleukin-5 level, correlates with the magnitude of the LAR and the increase in hyperresponsiveness. Both myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cell subsets have been involved in the pathogenesis of allergen-induced LAR. Myeloid dendritic cells are responsible for the allergen presentation and induction of inflammation and plasmacytoid dendritic cells play a role in the resolution of allergen-induced inflammation. A variety of potential new classes of asthma medication has also been evaluated with the allergen inhalation challenge in mild asthmatic subjects. Examples are TPI ASM8, an inhaled anti-sense oligonucleotide drug product, which attenuated both early and LARs via inhibition of the target gene mRNA of chemokine receptor 3, and the common β chain of interleukin-3, interleukin-5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor. Anti-human antibody interleukin-13 (IM-638) significantly attenuated both early and late allergen-induced asthma response. Pitrakinra, which targets both interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, substantially diminishes allergen-induced airway responses. Allergen-induced airway responses are a valuable way to evaluate the activity of possible new therapies in asthmatic airways.

Anti-Interleukin-5 Monoclonal Antibodies

Descriptive studies have shown an association between eosinophils, interleukin (IL)-5 and pathophysiological processes in patients with atopic asthma. These observations have led to an interest in the eosinophil as the pathogenic cell responsible for many of the clinical features of asthma including symptoms of wheeze, shortness of breath and cough, along with the physiological events such as airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and changes in lung function. IL-5 is one of the key cytokines responsible for eosinopoiesis in the bone marrow, along with recruitment and survival of eosinophils in the tissues. In view of this, IL-5 has been an attractive target for the development of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, inhibiting its action. The results of preclinical studies are viewed as encouraging. Preclinical development involved studies in mice, guinea-pigs and cynomolgus monkeys, with conflicting results in terms of changes in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophils, AHR and pulmonary resistance. These may be attributed to interspecies differences and to the different models used. Monoclonal antibodies directed against IL-5 have been used in at least four studies involving patients with asthma. Those preliminary studies have shown clear reductions in both blood and sputum eosinophils but no significant changes in physiological parameters of AHR, the late asthmatic reaction or in lung function or symptoms. As in the animal studies, these results suggest a dissociation between eosinophils, AHR, lung function and symptoms of asthma, which may be explained by the multitude of cells involved in the pathogenesis of asthma.

Combined fluticasone furoate/vilanterol reduces decline in lung function following inhaled allergen 23 h after dosing in adult asthma: a randomised, controlled trial

Background

There is a need for preventative asthma maintenance therapy that provides lasting bronchoprotection against allergen provocation. Fluticasone furoate (FF) is a novel inhaled once-daily corticosteroid, being investigated as monotherapy for asthma and in combination with vilanterol (VI), a novel inhaled once-daily long-acting beta-agonist, for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Methods

In a crossover study of 52 subjects with mild asthma, FF/VI 100/25mcg and FF 100 dosed once-daily in the evening for 28 days were compared with placebo to evaluate their capacity to provide bronchoprotection against the early asthmatic response (EAR) stimulated by an inhaled allergen challenge. Bronchoprotection was assessed by change from post-saline baseline in weighted mean (wm) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) for the first 2 h post-allergen challenge, which was on Day 29 (22–23 h post final dose on Day 28). The EAR was also assessed using maximum percent decrease from post-saline baseline and minimum absolute FEV₁; the incidence of adverse events was a secondary endpoint.

Results

FF/VI 100/25 and FF 100 both provided significant bronchoprotection against the EAR for all endpoints assessed. For wmFEV₁ over the first 2 h post-allergen challenge, a 162 mL (95% CI, 87 to 237 mL) difference was observed between placebo and FF 100, while a 145 mL (95% CI, 69 to 222 mL) difference was observed between placebo and FF/VI 100/25 treatment. No difference between active treatments was observed (−17 mL; 95% CI, –91 to 57 mL). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions

FF 100 alone and in combination with VI 25 provides significant bronchoprotection against the EAR in subjects with mild asthma. That this protection is provided at the trough of dosing, i.e. 23 h post last dose, supports the utility of FF 100 and FF/VI 100/25 as viable once-daily therapies.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01128569, GSK Study number: HZA113090

Reproducibility of sputum differential cell counts is not affected by squamous epithelial cells

OBJECTIVE

Induced sputum is used to assess markers of inflammation in asthmatic individuals, and sputum cell differential counts provide an outcome to evaluate the presence, type, and degree of inflammation in the airways. Contamination of sputum slides with squamous epithelial cells (SECs) has been reported to adversely affect the reproducibility of sputum cell differential counts; however, this has not been studied in a controlled manner. Excluding sputum slides because of excessive squamous cell contamination can be problematic resulting in under-powering of studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of SEC contamination and cell dispersion on the reproducibility of differential counts of sputum cells prepared on glass slides.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 33 sputum samples were induced from 11 subjects with mild asthma under baseline conditions and following an allergen inhalation challenge. Mucoid and salivary portions of each sample were divided and processed in parallel. To evaluate the effect of increasing the proportion of SEC and to evaluate the effect of increasing the number of leukocytes per high power field (HPF), four slides with varying leukocyte numbers and SEC percentages were prepared from each sample by combining and adjusting the volume of cell suspensions derived from mucous and saliva. The four slides were prepared to fall in the following categories: (A) 50 cells/HPF and <20% SEC; (B) 50 cells/HPF and >20% SEC; (C) 100 cells/HPF and <20% SEC; and (D) 100 cells/HPF and >20% SEC. All slides were blinded and counted twice by an experienced observer, and twice by an inexperienced observer.

RESULTS

The differential cell counts for eosinophils, macrophages, and neutrophils were highly reproducible under all conditions when enumerated by an experienced observer (ICC > 0.9), and furthermore, SEC contamination did not affect ICC when differential counts were enumerated by an inexperienced observer (ICC > 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that slides containing SECs, up to 40% in this study, have reproducible differential cell counts.

Effects of systemic versus local administration of corticosteroids on mucosal tolerance

Respiratory exposure to allergen induces T cell tolerance and protection against the development of airway hyperactivity in animal models of asthma. Whereas systemic administration of dexamethasone during the delivery of respiratory Ag has been suggested to prevent the development of mucosal tolerance, the effects of local administration of corticosteroids, first-line treatment for patients with bronchial asthma, on mucosal tolerance remain unknown. To analyze the effects of systemic versus local administration of different types of corticosteroids on the development of mucosal tolerance, mice were exposed to respiratory allergen to induce mucosal tolerance with or without systemic or intranasal application of different doses of dexamethasone or prednisolone. After the induction of mucosal tolerance, proliferation of T cells was inhibited in tolerized mice, whereas systemic applications of corticosteroids restored T cell proliferation and secretion of Th2 cytokines. In contrast, inhaled corticosteroids showed no effect on both T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion. In addition, mice systemically treated with corticosteroids showed an increased airway hyperactivity with a significant lung inflammation, but also an increased T effector cells/regulatory T cells ratio in the second lymphoid organs when compared with mice that receive corticosteroids by inhalation. These results demonstrate that local administration of corticosteroids has no effect on the development of immune tolerance in contrast to systemically applied corticosteroids. Furthermore, although different concentrations of corticosteroids are administered to patients, our results demonstrated that the route of administration rather than the doses affects the effect of corticosteroids on respiratory tolerance induction. Considering the broad application of corticosteroids in patients with allergic disease and asthma, the route of administration of steroid substances seems crucial in terms of treatment and potential side effects. These findings may help elucidate the apparently contradicting results of corticosteroid treatment in allergic diseases.

Roflumilast attenuates allergen-induced inflammation in mild asthmatic subjects

Background

Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors increase intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), leading to regulation of inflammatory cell functions. Roflumilast is a potent and targeted PDE4 inhibitor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of roflumilast on bronchoconstriction, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and airway inflammation in mild asthmatic patients undergoing allergen inhalation challenge.

Methods

25 subjects with mild allergic asthma were randomized to oral roflumilast 500 mcg or placebo, once daily for 14 days in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Allergen challenge was performed on Day 14, and FEV₁ was measured until 7 h post challenge. Methacholine challenge was performed on Days 1 (pre-dose), 13 (24 h pre-allergen), and 15 (24 h post-allergen), and sputum induction was performed on Days 1, 13, 14 (7 h post-allergen), and 15.

Results

Roflumilast inhibited the allergen-induced late phase response compared to placebo; maximum % fall in FEV₁ (p = 0.02) and the area under the curve (p = 0.01). Roflumilast had a more impressive effect inhibiting allergen-induced sputum eosinophils, neutrophils, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) at 7 h post-allergen (all p = 0.02), and sputum neutrophils (p = 0.04), ECP (p = 0.02), neutrophil elastase (p = 0.0001) and AHR (p = 0.004) at 24 h post-allergen.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a protective effect of roflumilast on allergen-induced airway inflammation. The observed attenuation of sputum eosinophils and neutrophils demonstrates the anti-inflammatory properties of PDE4 inhibition and supports the roles of both cell types in the development of late phase bronchoconstriction and AHR.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01365533

Early interventions with inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: benefits and risks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

the present review examines the effects of early intervention with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) on clinical efficacy and natural history of asthma based on two recent clinical trials: the Inhaled Steroid Treatment as Regular Therapy in Early Asthma (START) and Prevention of Early Asthma in Kids (PEAK) trials, and a comparison of the effect of regular vs. intermittent therapy based on the Improving Asthma Control Trial (IMPACT).

RECENT FINDINGS

in most patients, both adults and children, who have a new diagnosis of asthma and whose symptoms are mild but persistent, treatment with ICS should be recommended as soon as the diagnosis is made. This is a cost-effective and well tolerated treatment. However, symptoms may recur and lung function may decline again if treatment is discontinued.

SUMMARY

ICS is the most cost-effective initial treatment for both adults and children with a new diagnosis of asthma. If patients are reluctant to use ICS daily for long periods, it would be reasonable to delay the onset of treatment with ICS. Initial therapy with leukotriene receptor antagonist is not likely to be as effective as initial therapy with ICS. Biomarkers of airway inflammation such as sputum cell counts and exhaled nitric oxide are probably not necessary to treat patients with mild intermittent asthma.

The CKLF1-C19 peptide attenuates allergic lung inflammation by inhibiting CCR3- and CCR4-mediated chemotaxis in a mouse model of asthma

BACKGROUND

  Human chemokine-like factor 1 (CKLF1) is a functional ligand for human CCR4, which is highly expressed on Th2 lymphocytes and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. The expression and function of CKLF1 are associated with asthma. The CKLF1 C-terminal peptides C19 and C27 also interact with human CCR4. Albeit with weaker chemotactic activity, C19 can inhibit chemotaxis induced by both CKLF1 and CCL17. Here, we explore whether C19 can act as an antagonist in the development of asthma.

METHODS

  A mouse model of asthma and in vitro and in vivo chemotaxis assays were used.

RESULTS

  Using a mouse model of asthma, we demonstrate here that C19 reduces airway eosinophilia, lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness; in contrast, C27 has little effect on these parameters. The inhibitory effects of C19 on CCR4-mediated chemotaxis could be observed in human Th2 lymphocytes and in the splenocytes from ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Furthermore, we show that C19 can inhibit CCL11-induced chemotaxis of mouse eosinophils and human CCR3-transfected or mouse Ccr3-transfected HEK293 cells. In vivo chemotaxis assays revealed that C19 and C27 can reduce CCL11-mediated recruitment of eosinophils into the peritoneal cavity and that this inhibitory effect is stronger for C19 than for C27.

CONCLUSIONS

  Thus, C19 can attenuate airway eosinophilia and lung inflammation by inhibiting CCR3- and CCR4-mediated chemotaxis in a mouse model of asthma. Given its ability to inhibit human CCR3- and CCR4-meditated chemotaxis, C19 has great therapeutic potential for use in the treatment and control of allergic asthma.

Expression profiling identifies Klf15 as a glucocorticoid target that regulates airway hyperresponsiveness

Glucocorticoids (GCs), which activate GC receptor (GR) signaling and thus modulate gene expression, are widely used to treat asthma. GCs exert their therapeutic effects in part through modulating airway smooth muscle (ASM) structure and function. However, the effects of genes that are regulated by GCs on airway function are not fully understood. We therefore used transcription profiling to study the effects of a potent GC, dexamethasone, on human ASM (HASM) gene expression at 4 and 24 hours. After 24 hours of dexamethasone treatment, nearly 7,500 genes had statistically distinguishable changes in expression; quantitative PCR validation of a 40-gene subset of putative GR-regulated genes in 6 HASM cell lines suggested that the early transcriptional targets of GR signaling are similar in independent HASM lines. Gene ontology analysis implicated GR targets in controlling multiple aspects of ASM function. One GR-regulated gene, the transcription factor, Kruppel-like factor 15 (Klf15), was already known to modulate vascular smooth and cardiac muscle function, but had no known role in the lung. We therefore analyzed the pulmonary phenotype of Klf15(-/-) mice after ovalbumin sensitization and challenge. We found diminished airway responses to acetylcholine in ovalbumin-challenged Klf15(-/-) mice without a significant change in the induction of asthmatic inflammation. In cultured cells, overexpression of Klf15 reduced proliferation of HASM cells, whereas apoptosis in Klf15(-/-) murine ASM cells was increased. Together, these results further characterize the GR-regulated gene network in ASM and establish a novel role for the GR target, Klf15, in modulating airway function.

Hemopoietic progenitors: the role of eosinophil/basophil progenitors in allergic airway inflammation

Progenitor cells play important roles in the physiology and homeostasis of the overall hemopoietic system. The majority of hemopoietic activity takes place in the bone marrow, under the influence of resident marrow stromal cells, accessory cells, and/or their products. This constitutes the complex network of the hemopoietic inductive microenvironment, which is crucial for providing signals necessary for the maintenance of populations of progenitors at varying stages of lineage commitment. Accumulation of eosinophils and basophils in tissues is characteristic of allergic inflammation. A large body of evidence now exists which confirms that these tissue inflammatory events are coincident with relevant changes in progenitors; it has thus been hypothesized that the observed changes in mature cell numbers occur directly or indirectly as a result of differentiation of lineage-committed eosinophil/basophil, and perhaps other, progenitor cells. Differentiation and maturation of hemopoietic cells have traditionally been thought to be restricted to the bone marrow microenvironment. More recently, evidence has accumulated to suggest that some hemopoietic cells present in allergic tissue may be recruited from the bone marrow, traffic through the peripheral circulation and into tissues to participate in the ongoing inflammatory process at these distal sites. The clinical administration of monotherapy with topical corticosteroids, oral cysteinyl leukotriene antagonists and cytokine antagonists such as antibodies to interleukin-5, suggest that suppression of hemopoietic contributions to allergic inflammation may be necessary for full control of allergic inflammation and disease manifestations. In addition to progenitors being targets of therapy, they may well determine how and whether allergic inflammation is generated in early life, thus serving as biomarkers of disease.

Effects of budesonide and formoterol on allergen-induced airway responses, inflammation, and airway remodeling in asthma

BACKGROUND

Combining inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting beta(2)-agonists results in improved asthma symptom control and fewer asthma exacerbations compared with those seen after inhaled corticosteroids alone. However, there are limited data as to whether these beneficial effects are due to enhanced anti-inflammatory actions or whether such combination therapies affect airway remodeling in patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the effects of inhaled budesonide/formoterol combination therapy versus inhaled budesonide alone or inhaled placebo on allergen-induced airway responses, airway inflammation, and airway remodeling.

METHODS

Fourteen asthmatic subjects with dual responses after allergen inhalation were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, 3-period crossover study. Outcomes included early and late asthmatic responses, changes in airway responsiveness, sputum eosinophilia measured before and after allergen challenge, numbers of airway submucosal myofibroblasts, and smooth muscle area measured before and after study treatment.

RESULTS

Allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia was significantly reduced by combination treatment to a greater extent than by budesonide alone. Allergen inhalation resulted in a significant increase in submucosal tissue myofibroblast numbers and produced a significant decrease in percentage smooth muscle area. Combination therapy, but not budesonide monotherapy, significantly attenuated these changes in myofibroblast numbers and smooth muscle area.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects on allergen-induced changes in sputum eosinophils, airway myofibroblast numbers, and smooth muscle seen with combination therapy suggest that the benefits associated with this treatment might relate to effects on airway inflammation and remodeling. The attenuation of early asthmatic responses and airway hyperresponsiveness by combination treatment was likely due to the known functional antagonistic effect of formoterol.

Pharmacological strategies for improving the efficacy and therapeutic ratio of glucocorticoids in inflammatory lung diseases

Glucocorticoids are widely used to treat various inflammatory lung diseases. Acting via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), they exert clinical effects predominantly by modulating gene transcription. This may be to either induce (transactivate) or repress (transrepress) gene transcription. However, certain individuals, including those who smoke, have certain asthma phenotypes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or some interstitial diseases may respond poorly to the beneficial effects of glucocorticoids. In these cases, high dose, often oral or parental, glucocorticoids are typically prescribed. This generally leads to adverse effects that compromise clinical utility. There is, therefore, a need to enhance the clinical efficacy of glucocorticoids while minimizing adverse effects. In this context, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) can enhance the clinical efficacy of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma and COPD. Furthermore, LABAs can augment glucocorticoid-dependent gene expression and this action may account for some of the benefits of LABA/ICS combination therapies when compared to ICS given as a monotherapy. In addition to metabolic genes and other adverse effects that are induced by glucocorticoids, there are many other glucocorticoid-inducible genes that have significant anti-inflammatory potential. We therefore advocate a move away from the search for ligands of GR that dissociate transactivation from transrepression. Instead, we submit that ligands should be functionally screened by virtue of their ability to induce or repress biologically-relevant genes in target tissues. In this review, we discuss pharmacological methods by which selective GR modulators and "add-on" therapies may be exploited to improve the clinical efficacy of glucocorticoids while reducing potential adverse effects.

Importin-13 genetic variation is associated with improved airway responsiveness in childhood asthma

Background

Glucocorticoid function is dependent on efficient translocation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of cells. Importin-13 (IPO13) is a nuclear transport receptor that mediates nuclear entry of GR. In airway epithelial cells, inhibition of IPO13 expression prevents nuclear entry of GR and abrogates anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids. Impaired nuclear entry of GR has been documented in steroid-non-responsive asthmatics. We hypothesize that common IPO13 genetic variation influences the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma, as measured by change in methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR-PC₂₀).

Methods

10 polymorphisms were evaluated in 654 children with mild-to-moderate asthma participating in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP), a clinical trial of inhaled anti-inflammatory medications (budesonide and nedocromil). Population-based association tests with repeated measures of PC₂₀ were performed using mixed models and confirmed using family-based tests of association.

Results

Among participants randomized to placebo or nedocromil, IPO13 polymorphisms were associated with improved PC₂₀ (i.e. less AHR), with subjects harboring minor alleles demonstrating an average 1.51–2.17 fold increase in mean PC₂₀ at 8-months post-randomization that persisted over four years of observation (p = 0.01–0.005). This improvement was similar to that among children treated with long-term inhaled corticosteroids. There was no additional improvement in PC₂₀ by IPO13 variants among children treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

Conclusion

IPO13 variation is associated with improved AHR in asthmatic children. The degree of this improvement is similar to that observed with long-term inhaled corticosteroid treatment, suggesting that IPO13 variation may improve nuclear bioavailability of endogenous glucocorticoids.

Provoked models of asthma: what have we learnt?

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by physiological abnormalities of variable airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a wide variety of physical and inhaled chemical stimuli and the presence of symptoms. AHR is measured by challenging the airways with a variety of agonists and naturally occurring stimuli, which results in constriction of the airway smooth muscle, leading to airway narrowing and airflow limitation. There are two distinct mechanisms by which the airways can narrow to a constrictor stimulus and these are defined by the pathways they take to induce AHR. Direct stimuli are pharmacological agents administered exogenously (such as histamine or methacholine) that act 'directly' on specific receptors on the bronchial smooth muscle to cause constriction. The other mechanism by which the airway can narrow is via the inhalation of indirect stimuli, which include natural stimuli, such as allergen or exercise, and pharmacological agents such as adenosine monophosphate and hyper-osmotic agents (e.g. hypertonic saline or dry powder mannitol). These stimuli induce airway narrowing 'indirectly' by causing the endogenous release of mediators of bronchoconstriction from airway inflammatory cells. Provoked models of asthma have been extremely valuable in understanding the pathobiology of asthma, in aiding diagnosis, in helping to clarify the mechanisms of actions of effective drugs and in the development of new entities to treat asthma. Some provoked models are valuable clinically, particularly those that measure direct AHR, while others, particularly allergen challenge, have been used in animal models and in humans to study the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway inflammation and the associated physiological changes, as well in the development of new drugs for asthma. An emerging role for measurements of AHR is in the evaluation of the optimal treatment for patients with asthma.

Effect of an interleukin-4 variant on late phase asthmatic response to allergen challenge in asthmatic patients: results of two phase 2a studies

BACKGROUND

Increases in T helper (Th) 2 cytokine concentrations have been seen in atopic asthma, with interleukin 4 and interleukin 13 thought to have a role in the physiological response to allergen challenge. Our aim was to assess the therapeutic effect of pitrakinra, an interleukin-4 variant that targets allergic Th2 inflammation by potently inhibiting the binding of interleukin 4 and interleukin 13 to interleukin-4Ralpha receptor complexes.

METHODS

In two independent randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase 2a clinical trials, patients with atopic asthma were treated with pitrakinra or placebo via two routes. In study 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 25 mg pitrakinra (n=12) or placebo (n=12) by subcutaneous injection once daily. In study 2, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 60 mg pitrakinra (n=16) or placebo (n=16) by nebulisation twice daily. Inhaled allergen challenge was done before and after 4 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint for study 1 was maximum percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over 4-10 h after allergen challenge, whereas that in study 2 was average percentage decrease in FEV(1) over 4-10 h after allergen challenge. All patients except those with baseline data only were included in our analyses. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00535028 and NCT00535031.

FINDINGS

No patients dropped out or were lost to follow-up in study 1; in study 2, two patients in the placebo group and one in the pitrakinra group dropped out or were lost to follow-up. These individuals had baseline data only, and were excluded from the analyses. In study 1, there was a 17.1% maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 in the pitrakinra group; by contrast, the maximum decrease was 23.1% in the placebo group (difference 6%, 95% CI -4.37 to 16.32; p=0.243). In study 2, there was a 4.4% average percentage decrease in FEV1 in the pitrakinra group; by contrast, the average percentage decrease was 15.9% in the placebo group (3.7 [95% CI 2.08-6.25] times lower in the pitrakinra group; p=0.0001). There were fewer asthma-related adverse events (p=0.069) and fewer adverse events requiring beta-agonist rescue (p=0.031) after subcutaneous administration of pitrakinra than with placebo. There were too few asthma-related adverse events in study 2 to assess the effect of inhalation of pitrakinra on adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Local treatment, targeted at inhibition of interleukins 4 and 13 in the lung, could substantially diminish the symptoms of asthma.

The allergen bronchoprovocation model: an important tool for the investigation of new asthma anti-inflammatory therapies

Allergen bronchoprovocation tests have been used for more than two decades in the investigation of respiratory allergic diseases such as asthma and rhinitis. These bronchial challenges are now well standardized and can offer key information on the therapeutic potential of new agents and on their anti-inflammatory effects on the airways. Both standard and low-dose allergen provocations are safe when performed by experienced investigators and do not lead to persistent worsening of asthma or change in airway function. The evaluation of new therapeutic agents by these methods can also provide important information on the mechanisms of development and persistence of airway diseases.

Methacholine-induced pulmonary gas trapping in a mouse model of allergic asthma: effect of inhaled budesonide and ciglitazone

Previously, we found pulmonary gas trapping to be a rapid, simple and objective measure of methacholine-induced airway obstruction in naïve mice. In this study we extended that finding by using methacholine-induced pulmonary gas trapping to differentiate airway responses of ovalbumin-sensitized, ovalbumin-exposed (Positive Control) and ovalbumin-sensitized, sodium chloride-exposed (Negative Control) mice. Additionally, pulmonary gas trapping and enhanced pause were compared following methacholine exposure in sensitized and nonsensitized mice. Finally, we examined by nose-only inhalation the ability of the glucocorticosteroid budesonide and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist ciglitazone to modify methacholine-induced airway responses in ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Positive Controls exhibited a 7.8-fold increase in sensitivity and a 2.4-fold enhancement in the maximal airway obstruction to methacholine versus Negative Controls. Following methacholine, individual Positive and Negative Control mouse enhanced pause values overlapped in 9 of 9 studies, whereas individual Positive and Negative Control mouse excised lung gas volume values overlapped in only 1 of 9 studies, and log[excised lung gas volume] correlated (P=0.023) with in vivo log[enhanced pause] in nonsensitized mice. Finally, budesonide (100.0 or 1000.0 microg/kg) reduced methacholine-mediated airway responses and eosinophils and neutrophils, whereas ciglitazone (1000.0 microg/kg) had no effect on methacholine-induced pulmonary gas trapping, but reduced eosinophils. In conclusion, pulmonary gas trapping is a more reproducible measure of methacholine-mediated airway responses in ovalbumin-sensitized mice than enhanced pause. Also, excised lung gas volume changes can be used to monitor drug interventions like budesonide. Finally, this study highlights the importance of running a positive comparator when examining novel treatments like ciglitazone.

Effect of an NK1/NK2 receptor antagonist on airway responses and inflammation to allergen in asthma

RATIONALE

The tachykinins substance P and neurokinin A (NKA) are implicated in the pathophysiology of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the safety, tolerability, and pharmacologic and biological efficacy of a tachykinin NK(1)/NK(2) receptor antagonist, AVE5883, in patients with asthma in two double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover studies.

METHODS

The pharmacologic efficacy of a single inhaled dose (4.8 mg) of AVE5883 was tested against inhaled NKA in 20 patients with asthma. Subsequently, we studied the biological efficacy of the pharmacologically effective dose on inhaled allergen in a multiple-dose trial (4.8 mg three times per day, 9 d) in 12 patients with asthma with dual responses to inhaled house dust mite. On Day 8, an allergen challenge was conducted, and airway response was measured by FEV(1) until 9 hours postallergen. Exhaled NO, provocative concentration of methacholine bromide causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), and induced sputum were performed on Days 1, 7, and 9.

RESULTS

AVE5883 had a bad taste, and transient bronchospasm occurred in some subjects. A single inhaled dose shifted the dose response to NKA by 1.2 doubling doses. Pretreatment with multiple doses of AVE5883 enhanced the allergen-induced early and late airway responses. There were no significant differences in the allergen-induced changes in exhaled NO, provocative concentration of methacholine bromide causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), and sputum cell differentials between placebo and AVE5883.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its demonstrated pharmacologic activity against inhaled NKA, multiple doses of AVE5883 increased the allergen-induced airway responses without affecting markers of airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Our data question the prominent role of neurogenic inflammation in asthma and, consequently, the therapeutic potential of dual tachykinin antagonists.

Montelukast treatment attenuates the increase in myofibroblasts following low-dose allergen challenge

RATIONALE

Airway remodeling is believed to be important in the pathophysiology of asthma, and myofibroblasts are increased in the airways of asthmatic individuals 24 h after allergen challenge. Leukotriene receptor antagonists exert antiinflammatory activity in asthma, but it is unknown whether they influence indices of airway remodeling. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of montelukast on airway myofibroblasts following low-dose allergen challenge (LDAC).

METHODS

Stable subjects with mild asthma were included in a two-center, randomized, parallel-group study. A 2-week run-in period was followed by LDAC and endobronchial biopsy. Subjects were then randomized to receive either montelukast, 10 mg/d, or placebo (n = 10 in each group) for 8 weeks in a double-blind manner; at the end of the treatment period, subjects underwent a second LDAC and endobronchial biopsy. The effect of treatment on myofibroblasts, fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells was examined using electron microscopy techniques.

RESULTS

Treatment with montelukast showed no significant difference by comparison with placebo but did show a significant within-group treatment-related decrease in airway wall myofibroblasts not seen in the placebo group. In addition, the montelukast-treated group also showed a significant within-group reduction in lymphomononuclear cells and increased neutrophils.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that montelukast has an inhibitory effect on airway structural cells that play a key role in airway remodeling in allergic airway inflammation, and that montelukast may be a useful therapy to attenuate airway remodeling in asthma.

The effect of a single inhaled dose of a VLA-4 antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma

Adhesion molecule very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is implicated in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells in asthma, including eosinophils, T cells and mast cells. VLA-4 antagonists have been proposed as a new anti-inflammatory treatment modality for asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether a single inhaled dose of VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X could protect against allergen-induced changes in airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study with single inhaled doses of 3 mg of GW559090X, 500 microg of fluticasone propionate (FP) or placebo in 15 patients with mild intermittent asthma, controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists only. All patients developed a late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation during screening. Study medication was administered 30 min prior to allergen challenge. Pre-dose and 24 h post-dose PC20 methacholine and levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were determined. At the given dose, VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X did not attenuate the early asthmatic response (EAR) when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 27.2+/-3.7 and 21.9+/-3.0 respectively (P=0.33); nor the LAR: mean AUC3-8 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 98.8+/-12.9 and 94.8+/-6.8 respectively (P=0.84). However, pretreatment with FP did attenuate both EAR and LAR when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h11.6+/-3.3 (P=0.024) and mean AUC3-8 h 6.3+/-7.6 (P<0.001). None of these treatments had an effect on allergen-induced changes in airway hyper-responsiveness or eNO levels. These findings suggest that VLA-4 may not play a major role in allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.

Immunostimulatory Sequences Regulate Interferon-inducible Genes but not Allergic Airway Responses

RATIONALE

1018 ISS is a synthetic oligonucleotide containing immunostimulatory CpG motifs. In animal studies, 1018 ISS effectively inhibited Th2-mediated lung inflammation, including eosinophil infiltration, and airway hyperresponsiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether 1018 ISS has activity in subjects with allergic asthma.

METHODS

Forty subjects (n = 21, 1018 ISS; n = 19, placebo) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to examine safety, pharmacologic activity, and efficacy of 1018 ISS on allergen-induced airway responses. Subjects received 36 mg of 1018 ISS or placebo by nebulization weekly for 4 wk.

MEASUREMENTS

Allergen inhalation challenge was performed 24 h after the 2nd and 4th doses to measure the early and late fall in FEV(1). Sputum cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected before and after dosing, and gene expression was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

MAIN RESULTS

Treatment with 1018 ISS significantly increased expression of interferon (IFN)-gamma and IFN-inducible genes, such as IFN-gamma-inducible 10 kD protein (IP10), monokine induced by IFN-gamma (MIG), IFN-stimulated gene (ISG)-54, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, and MCP-2 from cells collected postdose (p < 0.05). There was no attenuation of the early or late decrease in FEV(1) after 1018 ISS compared with placebo, nor a reduction in allergen-induced sputum eosinophils or Th2-related gene expression measured in sputum cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 1018 ISS is safe and pharmacologically active in the respiratory tract of asthmatics but, at this dose regimen, did not inhibit a fall in FEV(1) or other key features of the response to inhaled allergen challenge. This suggests that induction of IFN and IFN-inducible genes alone is not sufficient to inhibit allergen-induced responses in asthmatic subjects.

Effect of a very late antigen-4 receptor antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma

BACKGROUND

Very late antigen-4 (VLA(4)) plays a key role in the recruitment of eosinophils in allergic responses in animal studies.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether pretreatment with multiple doses of a VLA(4) receptor antagonist, HMR 1031, protects against allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in humans.

METHODS

Fourteen asthmatics (7F/7M), 18-49 years, PC(20) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) methacholine (M) (<8 mg/mL; FEV(1) 82.3-116.1% predicted) with dual responses to inhaled allergen participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Each treatment period consisted of 9 days, separated by >or=2 weeks. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), PC(20)FEV(1)(M) and hypertonic saline-induced sputum was obtained on Days 1, 7 and 9. Subjects inhaled HMR 1031 (20 mg b.i.d.) or placebo (P) on Days 1--8. On Day 8, an allergen bronchoprovocation test was performed, the airway response was measured by FEV(1), and expressed as %fall from baseline. Data from 12 evaluable subjects are presented here.

RESULTS

Both treatments were well tolerated. There was no significant difference between HMR 1031 and P in the early asthamatic response: mean AUC (0-3 h)+/-SEM (%fall h): 26.01+/-4.26 and 17.41+/-4.26, respectively (P=0.18), nor in the late response: mean AUC (3-9 h)+/-SEM (%fall h): 97.09+/-8.63 and 97.61+/-8.63, respectively, P=0.97. This corresponded to the absence of significant allergen-induced changes in PC(20)FEV(1)(M), eNO, sputum eosinophils and soluble inflammation markers between both treatment periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with multiple inhaled doses of the VLA(4) antagonist, HMR 1031, did not result in detectable protection against allergen-induced airway responses or airway inflammation in asthma.

Respiratory tolerance is inhibited by the administration of corticosteroids

Corticosteroids constitute the most effective current anti-inflammatory therapy for acute and chronic forms of allergic diseases and asthma. Corticosteroids are highly effective in inhibiting the effector function of Th2 cells, eosinophils, and epithelial cells. However, treatment with corticosteroids may also limit beneficial T cell responses, including respiratory tolerance and the development of regulatory T cells (T(Reg)), which actively suppress inflammation in allergic diseases. To examine this possibility, we investigated the effects of corticosteroid administration on the development of respiratory tolerance. Respiratory exposure to Ag-induced T cell tolerance and prevented the subsequent development of allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity. However, treatment with dexamethasone during the delivery of respiratory Ag prevented tolerance, such that allergen sensitization and severe airway hyperreactivity subsequently occurred. Treatment with dexamethasone during respiratory exposure to allergen eliminated the development of IL-10-secreting dendritic cells, which was required for the induction of IL-10-producing allergen-specific T(Reg) cells. Therefore, because allergen-specific T(Reg) cells normally develop to prevent allergic disease and asthma, our results suggest that treatment with corticosteroids, which limit the development of T(Reg) cells and tolerance to allergens, could enhance subsequent Th2 responses and aggravate the long-term course of allergic diseases and asthma.

Clinically masked increases in bronchial inflammation in guideline-treated persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines generally recommend a combination of inhaled corticosteroids and a Beta2-agonist for persistent asthma. The adjustment of anti-inflammatory therapy in persistent asthma is advised to be guided mainly by the presence of symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether clinically masked increases in bronchial inflammation occur in guideline-treated, persistent asthma following allergen exposure.

METHODS

After a 4-week steroid-run-in period (fluticasone 250 microg twice daily) 48 allergic patients with persistent asthma underwent a bronchial challenge with a single dose of allergen, after inhalation of salbutamol (400 microg, nebulized dose). FEV1 and sputum markers of bronchial inflammation were measured before and after allergen challenge. Furthermore, additional rescue-salbutamol usage was recorded following allergen challenge.

RESULTS

After allergen challenge there was a significant increase in sputum eosinophil numbers (geometric mean number x 10(4)/g [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.3; 1.0] before, and 2.4 [1.3; 4.2] after challenge, p=0.01). The mean change in FEV1 between 4 and 8h after challenge relative to baseline was -0.04% [95% CI-2.3; 2.2], p>0.9. None of the patients took additional rescue salbutamol over 8 h after allergen challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically masked increases in bronchial inflammation occur in guideline-treated, persistent asthma following allergen exposure. This finding underscores the need for additional guides for the adjustment of anti-inflammatory therapy in persistent asthma.

Protection by budesonide and fluticasone on allergen-induced airway responses after discontinuation of therapy

BACKGROUND

Treatment with inhaled steroids is an effective method of reducing bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation after allergen challenge. However, the duration of the protective effects of inhaled steroids after discontinuation of therapy has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the protective effect of 1 week of inhaled steroid therapy against inhaled allergen challenge 12 hours after discontinuation of therapy.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 26 asthmatic subjects (>18 years old) not using inhaled steroids were administered 200 microg of budesonide twice daily, 200 microg of fluticasone twice daily, or placebo twice daily for 1 week. Twelve hours after discontinuation of therapy, subjects were administered an inhaled allergen challenge. Each treatment period was separated by a 3-week washout period.

RESULTS

When compared with placebo (26% +/- 14%), there was a slight but significant protection against the allergen-induced early response after fluticasone treatment (19% +/- 10%, P = .001) but not after budesonide treatment (23% +/- 13%, P = .08). However, when the area under the curve for the early airway response was examined, there was no difference between the 2 drugs in the amount of protection ( P = .62). Partial protection was demonstrated against the late-response allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia with both treatments ( P = .001). By contrast, no protection was observed against allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness for either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effects of inhaled steroids against allergen-induced early responses, airway eosinophilia, and allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness are partially or completely lost as early as 12 hours after discontinuation of therapy.

NMR analysis of neutrophil activation in sputum samples from patients with cystic fibrosis

Disorders of the respiratory system, such as cystic fibrosis (CF), involve the infiltration and activation of airway inflammatory cells, including neutrophils. This leads to the secretion of peroxidases, which react further with substrates in solution to produce oxidative metabolites, such as 3-chlorotyrosine. Elevated levels of modified tyrosine residues in the airways of patients with CF may be detectable by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in correlation with inflammatory cell influx. In this study, high-resolution (500 MHz) 1H NMR was used to analyze the production of modified tyrosine residues resulting from in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood eosinophils and neutrophils, as well as in sputum samples from control subjects and patients with CF. Following in vitro stimulation, purified peripheral blood neutrophils generated 3-chlorotyrosine, while eosinophils produced predominantly 3-bromotyrosine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine. Chlorinated and brominated tyrosine residues were detected in sputum samples from patients with CF (N=7), but were not detected in the control group (N=9). Neutrophil counts in CF sputum correlated strongly with the presence of 3-chlorotyrosine (r2=0.869). Our findings indicate that neutrophil and eosinophil activation in CF is detectable by NMR. NMR may be a useful tool for the detection of biological markers of inflammatory processes in patient airways.

Transient corticosteroid treatment permanently amplifies the Th2 response in a murine model of asthma

Corticosteroids (CS) remain the most efficacious pharmacotherapeutic option for the management of asthma. Although the acute anti-inflammatory effects of CS treatment have been amply documented both clinically and experimentally, recent human data intimate that exposure to CS may be associated with retrograde immune phenomena, including enhanced synthesis of IgE in vivo and elevated Th2 cytokine production in vitro. We have investigated the long-term immunologic effects of CS treatment in a murine model of allergic airway inflammation. CS treatment during initial exposure to OVA or upon long-term Ag rechallenge remarkably attenuated eosinophilic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Interestingly, however, Th2 cytokine production by cultured splenocytes from CS-treated mice was significantly elevated, while IFN-gamma synthesis was depressed. Moreover, mice rechallenged with OVA several weeks after CS intervention during allergic sensitization not only developed airway inflammation, but also exhibited enhanced Th2 cytokine production in lymphoid tissues and OVA-specific IgE in serum. This amplification of the systemic immune response was associated with an intact APC compartment during CS-conditioned sensitization to OVA. These data indicate that immune processes underlying the allergic phenotype remain impervious to CS treatment and raise the possibility that treatment with CS during sensitization may amplify elements of the allergen-specific immune response.

An effective strategy for diagnosing occupational asthma: use of induced sputum

Monitoring airway inflammation by means of induced sputum cell counts seems to improve the management of asthma. We sought to assess whether such monitoring at the end of periods at and away from work combined with the monitoring of PEF could improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma. We enrolled subjects suspected of having occupational asthma. Serial monitoring of PEF was performed during 2 weeks at and away from work. At the end of each period, induced sputum was collected. Specific inhalation challenge was subsequently performed. PEF graphs were interpreted visually by five independent observers. Forty-nine subjects, including 23 with positive specific inhalation challenge, completed the study. The addition of sputum cell counts to the monitoring of PEF increased the specificity of this test, respectively, by 18 (range [r] 13.7-25.5) or 26.8% (r 24.8-30.4) depending if an increase of sputum eosinophils greater than 1 or 2% when at work was considered as significant. The sensitivity increased by 8.2% (r 4.1-13.4) or decreased by 12.3% (r 3.1-24.1) depending on the cutoff value in sputum eosinophils chosen (greater than 1 or 2%, respectively). The addition of sputum cell counts to PEF monitoring is useful to improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma.

Biological markers in diagnosing, monitoring, and treating asthma: a focus on noninvasive measurements

Asthma is a major concern for society, healthcare professionals, and individuals and families directly affected by asthma due to rising morbidity rates and costs associated with the disease. The pathological hallmark of asthma is airway inflammation that is considered to be a major cause of exacerbations and persistent structural alterations of the airways. Assessing airway inflammation is important for investigating the underlying mechanisms of the disease and possibly for following the progression and resolution of the disease. The presence and type of airway inflammation can be difficult to detect clinically, and may result in delays in initiating appropriate therapy. The purpose of this article is to review noninvasive methods for assessing biological markers of airway inflammation and their potential role in the future for diagnosing, monitoring, and treating asthma. The article reviews the noninvasive measurements of induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide as indicators of airway inflammation.

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or both, plus long-acting beta2-agonists on asthma pathophysiology: a review of the evidence

Chronic inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction are consistent features of asthma, and are responsible for disease progression and airway remodelling. The development of chronic airway inflammation depends upon the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells and the subsequent release of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines. Cellular and histological evaluation of drugs with anti-inflammatory activity, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), is achieved by analysing samples of lung tissue or biological fluids, obtained by techniques such as bronchial biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum induction. These provide valuable information on the inflammatory processes occurring in the lung, although not all are equal in value. The beneficial effects of ICSs in asthma treatment are a consequence of their potent and broad anti-inflammatory properties. Furthermore, there have been promising results indicating that ICSs can reverse some of the structural changes that contribute to airway remodelling. Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs) added to ICSs provide greater clinical efficacy than ICSs alone, suggesting the possibility of complementary activity on the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma: inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction. Leukotrienes play a part in the pathogenesis of asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) directly inhibit bronchoconstriction and may have some anti-inflammatory effects, although the extent to which inhibiting one set of inflammatory mediators attenuates the inflammatory response is questionable. In concert with their effect on a broad variety of inflammatory mediators and cells, treatment with ICSs (including ICSs and LABAs) results in superior control of the pathophysiology of asthma and superior clinical efficacy as assessed by the greater improvements in pulmonary function and overall control of asthma compared with LTRAs.

The effects of an anti-CD11a mAb, efalizumab, on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in subjects with atopic asthma

BACKGROUND

Efalizumab is a humanized IgG(1) mAb against the lymphocyte function antigen-1 (LFA-1) alpha chain, CD11a. Blocking of LFA-1/intercellular adhesion molecule interactions could inhibit asthmatic inflammation by blocking adhesion and activation of LFA-1-positive leukocytes.

OBJECTIVE

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study investigated the effects of efalizumab on allergen-induced airway responsiveness and airway inflammation.

METHODS

Thirty-five nonsmoking subjects with mild allergic asthma were randomized to receive efalizumab (n = 24) or placebo (n = 11) in 8 weekly subcutaneous doses (0.7 mg/kg conditioning dose followed by 7 weekly doses of 2.0 mg/kg). Allergen challenges were performed at screening and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Samples of sputum (n = 18 subjects) and blood (n = 35 subjects) were collected the day before challenges, and sputum was collected again at 7 and 24 hours after each challenge. Nonparametric tests were used to compare allergen-induced differences between efalizumab and placebo groups.

RESULTS

Subjects receiving efalizumab developed headache (48%) and flu syndrome (28%) compared to subjects receiving placebo (0%). After 8 weeks of efalizumab, the maximum late percent fall in FEV(1) (late asthmatic response) was inhibited by 50%, but neither the late response nor the late area under the curve was statistically different than placebo (P =.098 and.062, respectively). Efalizumab had no effect on the maximum early percent fall in FEV(1) (early asthmatic response) or early area under the curve compared to placebo (P >.59). Efalizu-mab significantly reduced the postallergen increase in sputum EG2-positive cells and metachromatic cells (P <.05). No other comparisons were statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Blocking of LFA-1/intercellular adhesion module interactions by efalizumab inhibits the development of allergen-induced cellular inflammatory responses measured in induced sputum and might attenuate the late asthmatic response. Larger studies are needed to confirm this.

Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: common clinical quandaries

This narrative review provides evidence-based explanations to some of the common clinical concerns regarding inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for a newly diagnosed asthmatic patient. Better results are obtained when treatment is initiated as soon as the diagnosis is made. Asthma control can be achieved and maintained in most patients with a low or moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroid administered in two daily doses. Longer duration of treatment provides more sustained benefits than treatment that is intermittent and for short periods of time. The clinical benefits can be observed within 24 hours of commencing treatment and may be more pronounced in patients with an eosinophilic bronchitis. Inhaled corticosteroids provide additional benefit when used in conjunction with prednisone in acute severe asthma. Low doses do not have clinically deleterious side effects on the bones, growth, eye, or hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal-axis. However, they do not normalize lung function and prevent structural changes in the airway wall in all asthmatic patients.