New Guidelines for Bronchodilator Responsiveness in COPD: A Test in Search of a Use

Bronchodilator responsiveness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence, significance, and clinical implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is often considered a key feature distinguishing asthma from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, recent evidence suggests that BDR alone may not be a reliable discriminator between these conditions. There is still no consensus on BDR definitions and testing protocols. Additionally, it remains unclear whether BDR is linked to a specific COPD phenotype or influences treatment responses. Our review of recent literature attempts to clarify some of these issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

A significant proportion of COPD patients demonstrate BDR, but the variability in testing procedures and definitions makes it challenging to draw any definite conclusion. There is no evident association between BDR and specific COPD characteristics. A few studies suggest that BDR may be associated with marginally better treatment response and disease outcomes in COPD. The impact of recent changes in BDR definitions on clinical practice remains to be fully understood.

SUMMARY

There is still no clear, clinically relevant threshold to define BDR. BDR is an unreliable discriminator to differentiate asthma from COPD and is not consistently linked to any specific COPD phenotype, treatment response, or disease outcomes. Further research is needed to refine the definitions and implications of BDR in COPD.

ERS/ATS Global Lung Function Initiative normal values and classifying severity based on z-scores instead of per cent predicted

Among the most discussed issues in the field of pulmonary function testing are reference equations and standardised methods of interpreting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) task force gathered information from multiple countries with diverse ethnicities to create a multi-ethnic reference formula suitable for a broad age range. Their first output was the GLI-2012 spirometry reference equations. Together with the GLI-2012 reference equations, the GLI document recommended the use of z-scores to standardise the interpretation of PFT results. Z-scores were introduced as an alternative to per cent predicted and fixed thresholds in interpreting PFTs. After more than a decade, there is still debate on which method of interpretation is better.

Prevalence of Bronchodilator Responsiveness: A Comparison of Old Versus New Criteria

BACKGROUND

In 2021, the European Respiratory Society (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines issued a new definition of bronchodilator responsiveness, which is now defined as an increase in FEV1 or FVC by ≥ 10% of the predicted FEV1 or FVC. The impact of this revised definition on bronchodilator responsiveness prevalence has been relatively understudied.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 2,696 subjects who performed pulmonary function testing at the University of Iowa from 1997 to 2018. We compared the prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness by using the 2005 (FEV1 or FVC increase ≥ 12% baseline value and ≥ 200 mL) and 2021 (FEV1 or FVC increase ≥ 200 mL and ≥ 12% of baseline value) ERS/ATS definitions, across several different respiratory diagnosis categories. We compared the prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness using the 2 definitions by applying the McNemar test and assessed concordance of bronchodilator responsiveness by calculating kappa coefficients for the whole study population and within each diagnosis category.

RESULTS

The prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness increased from 9% when using the 2005 ERS/ATS definition to 16% when using the 2021 definition within the entire cohort and also within each respiratory diagnosis category. In the subjects with normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry, there was a low prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness (3%) when using the 2005 definition, and the prevalence increased (8%) when using the 2021 definition. In the subjects with normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry and FEV1 Z score ≥ 0, 2% had bronchodilator responsivness according to the 2005 guidelines, whereas 7% had bronchodilator responsiveness according to the 2021 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness increased when using the new 2021 ERS/ATS definition compared with the 2005 definition. In the subjects with normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry, the prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness increased when using the 2021 definition, in particular, among those with an FEV1 Z score ≥ 0, which raises concerns for overdiagnosis. Future investigations should examine the correlation of bronchodilator responsiveness with clinical outcomes in this group of subjects.

Assessing the Impact of the Updated 2021 European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Criteria on Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma

Introduction The European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) Task Force released new technical standards on spirometry interpretation in 2021. Our study compares bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in asthma, evaluating the impact of the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS criteria and the influence of predictive equations. Methods A retrospective cohort study of adult patients with asthma was referred to spirometry with a BDR test at the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia. The study included adult patients with asthma who underwent BDR testing in the Department of Respiratory Pathophysiology at the institute and had available data on height, gender, age, race, and eosinophil count. Results Among 197 patients, 69 were men (35.0%), the median age was 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 38-60), and a positive BDR test occurred in 50 (25.38%) according to the 2005 criteria and 42 (21.32%) according to 2021 criteria when using the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference equations. Strong agreement was observed between the ERS/ATS 2005 and 2021 criteria (Cohen's kappa index: 0.887, 95%, CI 0.810 to 0.963). Similar results were found with the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and the European Community of Coal and Steel (ECCS) predictive equations. Positive BDR tests were common in patients with moderately severe and severe forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) impairment and were not associated with eosinophil count or total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels. Conclusion The introduction of the 2021 ERS/ATS criteria did not significantly alter the classification of BDR in the majority of asthma patients, ensuring diagnostic stability. Whichever criterion was used, positive BDR correlated with the extent of FEV1 impairment, but not asthma biomarkers.

Exploring the associations between elevated plasma SP-D levels and OSCAR gene expression as potential biomarkers in patients with COPD: a cross-sectional study

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Spirometry is the most widely used test to diagnose the disease; however, a surrogate marker is required to predict the disease pattern and progression. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to explore the association of elevated levels of plasma surfactant protein D (SP-D) with gene expression of osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR) and lung functions as potential diagnostic biomarkers of COPD. Methods: This cross-sectional study employed convenience sampling. As men compose the majority of patients in the outpatient department and with smoking being common among Pakistani men, choosing men offered a representative sample. Using a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) to a forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 0.70 (FEV1/FVC <0.7), COPD patients were diagnosed on spirometry (n = 41). Controls were healthy individuals with FEV1/FVC >0.7 (n = 41). Plasma SP-D levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The gene expression of OSCAR was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and subsequently analyzed by the threshold cycle (Ct) method. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean BMI of controls (25.66 ± 4.17 kg/m2) was higher than that of cases (23.49 ± 2.94 kg/m2 (p = .008)). The median age of controls was 49 years (interquartile range (IQR) 42.0-65.0 years) and that of cases was 65 years (IQR = 57.50-68.50). SP-D concentration was not significantly higher in COPD patients [4.96 ng/mL (IQR 3.26-7.96)] as compared to controls [3.64 ng/mL (IQR 2.60-8.59)] (p = .209). The forced expiratory ratio (FEV1/FVC) and FEV1 were related to gene expression of OSCAR (p = <.001). The gene expression of OSCAR was significantly related to SP-D (p = .034). A multiple regression model found FEV1 and FVC to have a significant effect on the gene expression of OSCAR (p-values <0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Gene expression of OSCAR was increased in COPD patients and related directly to SP-D levels and inversely to lung functions in cohort of this study, suggesting that OSCAR along with SP-D may serve as a diagnostic biomarker of COPD.

Prevalence, Diagnostic Utility and Associated Characteristics of Bronchodilator Responsiveness

Rationale: The prevalence and diagnostic utility of bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in a real-life setting is unclear. Objective: To explore this uncertainty in patients aged ⩾12 years with physician-assigned diagnoses of asthma, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or COPD in NOVELTY, a prospective cohort study in primary and secondary care in 18 countries. Methods: The proportion of patients with a positive BDR test in each diagnostic category was calculated using 2005 (ΔFEV1 or ΔFVC ⩾12% and ⩾200 ml) and 2021 (ΔFEV1 or ΔFVC >10% predicted) European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society criteria. Measurements and Main Results: We studied 3,519 patients with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma, 833 with a diagnosis of asthma + COPD, and 2,436 with a diagnosis of COPD. The prevalence of BDR was 19.7% (asthma), 29.6% (asthma + COPD), and 24.7% (COPD) using 2005 criteria and 18.1%, 23.3%, and 18.0%, respectively, using 2021 criteria. Using 2021 criteria in patients diagnosed with asthma, BDR was associated with higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide; lower lung function; higher symptom burden; more frequent hospital admissions; and greater use of triple therapy, oral corticosteroids, or biologics. In patients diagnosed with COPD, BDR (2021) was associated with lower lung function and higher symptom burden. Conclusions: BDR prevalence in patients with chronic airway diseases receiving treatment ranges from 18% to 30%, being modestly lower with the 2021 than with the 2005 European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society criteria, and it is associated with lower lung function and greater symptom burden. These observations question the validity of BDR as a key diagnostic tool for asthma managed in clinical practice or as a standard inclusion criterion for clinical trials of asthma and instead suggest that BDR be considered a treatable trait for chronic airway disease.

Impact of the new European respiratory (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) pulmonary function test interpretation guidelines 2021 on the interpretation of bronchodilator responsiveness in subjects with airway obstruction

BACKGROUND

The impact of the new 2021 European Respiratory Society (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) pulmonary function test interpretation guidelines on the interpretation of bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in subjects with airway obstruction is still required. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the agreement between the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS criteria regarding the interpretation of the BDR. Moreover, we explore the factors that influenced the discordance of positive bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR+) between these two criteria.

METHODS

The agreement regarding the interpretation of BDR + between the two criteria was assessed using kappa (κ). The percentage of agreement in the interpretation of BDR + between the two criteria was calculated. The factors that influenced the discordance of BDR + between these two criteria were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 500 subjects with a mean age of 60.5 ± 15.6 years, 62.2% male were included. The study observed a good level of agreement in the interpretation of BDR + between the two criteria with kappa values = 0.782. The percentages of agreement on the interpretation of BDR + between the two criteria were high, with values = 90.6%. Male sex was the only factor that influenced the discordance of BDR + between these two criteria.

CONCLUSION

A good level of agreement was observed in the interpretation of BDR + between the 2005 and 2021 criteria. Therefore, the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS criteria for BDR can be used interchangeably. However, the discordance of BDR + between these two criteria could be affected by sex.

Prevalence, risk factors, and mortality of COPD in young people in the USA: results from a population-based retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been considered a disease of the elderly, but it could also occur in young people aged 20-50 years. However, the characteristics and prognosis of COPD in such young people remain unclear.

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort study was based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants who 20-50 years old at baseline and completed the pulmonary function test were enrolled in our study cohort. These participants were followed up to 31 December 2019. The sample weight and Taylor Linearization Procedures were adapted to make representative estimations of prevalence and baseline characteristics. The weighted logistic regression model was used to assess the risk factors. The propensity score method and Cox proportional hazard models were applied to calculate the risk of mortality.

RESULTS

The weighted prevalence of COPD in young people in the USA was 1.64% and it increased with age, with a higher prevalence in males than females (2.59% vs 0.72%, p<0.001). The proportion of Global Initiative for COPD 1-2 was 96.7%. Males (OR=4.56, 95% CI: 2.74 to 7.61), non-Hispanic black (OR=2.77; 95% CI: 1.14 to 6.75), non-Hispanic white (OR=4.93; 95% CI: 2.16 to 11.28) and smoking (current smoking, OR=2.36; 95% CI: 1.40 to 3.98; ever smoking, OR=1.92; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.51; passive smoking, OR=2.12; 95% CI: 1.41 to 3.20) were shown to be independent risk factors for COPD in young people. Compared with those matched by sex, age and race, the young people with COPD had a higher risk of all-cause death (HR=3.314, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

COPD in young people has a low prevalence in the USA and its independent risk factors included male, race (non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white) and smoking. Young COPD has a higher risk of all-cause mortality than the matched non-COPD.

Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Tobacco-Exposed People With or Without COPD

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in obstructive lung disease varies over time and may be associated with distinct clinical features.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is consistent BDR over time (always present) differentially associated with obstructive lung disease features relative to inconsistent (sometimes present) or never (never present) BDR in tobacco-exposed people with or without COPD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 2,269 tobacco-exposed participants in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study with or without COPD. We used various BDR definitions: change of ≥ 200 mL and ≥ 12% in FEV1 (FEV1-BDR), change in FVC (FVC-BDR), and change in in FEV1, FVC or both (ATS-BDR). Using generalized linear models adjusted for demographics, smoking history, FEV1 % predicted after bronchodilator administration, and number of visits that the participant completed, we assessed the association of BDR group: (1) consistent BDR, (2) inconsistent BDR, and (3) never BDR with asthma, CT scan features, blood eosinophil levels, and FEV1 decline in participants without COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage 0) and the entire cohort (participants with or without COPD).

RESULTS

Both consistent and inconsistent ATS-BDR were associated with asthma history and greater small airways disease (%parametric response mapping functional small airways disease) relative to never ATS-BDR in participants with GOLD stage 0 disease and the entire cohort. We observed similar findings using FEV1-BDR and FVC-BDR definitions. Eosinophils did not vary consistently among BDR groups. Consistent BDR was associated with FEV1 decline over time relative to never BDR in the entire cohort. In participants with GOLD stage 0 disease, both the inconsistent ATS-BDR group (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.21-4.66; P < .001) and consistent ATS-BDR group (OR, 9.48; 95% CI, 3.77-29.12; P < .001) were associated with progression to COPD relative to the never ATS-BDR group.

INTERPRETATION

Demonstration of BDR, even once, describes an obstructive lung disease phenotype with a history of asthma and greater small airways disease. Consistent demonstration of BDR indicated a high risk of lung function decline over time in the entire cohort and was associated with higher risk of progression to COPD in patients with GOLD stage 0 disease.

Bronchodilator Responsiveness Defined by the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS Criteria in Patients with Asthma as Well as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background

In the 2021 ERS/ATS interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests, a positive bronchodilator response (BDR) was updated as a change of >10% relative to the predicted value in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) or forced vital capacity (FVC). We aimed to explore the differences between the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS criteria applied to patients with asthma as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

BDR test data about asthma patients aged 6–80 years and COPD patients aged 18–80 years were derived from the National Respiratory Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from January 2017 to March 2022. BDR results defined by the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS criteria were named 2005-BDR and 2021-BDR, respectively. We compared differences between 2005-BDR and 2021-BDR and analyzed the trend in the proportion of positive BDR (BDR+) with the level of airflow obstruction.

Results

A total of 4457 patients with asthma and 7764 patients with COPD were included in the analysis. The percentages of 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ were 63.32% and 52.84% for asthma, 30.92% and 22.94% for COPD, respectively. Of patients with 2005-BDR+, 81.86% for asthma and 70.18% for COPD showed 2021-BDR+ results, and these patients had higher FEV₁%pred, FVC%pred (all P<0.05). Whichever BDR criterion was adopted, the proportion of BDR+ had an upward linear trend with the increased degree of airflow obstruction in COPD, but exhibited an approximate inverted U-shaped curve in asthma. In COPD, the proportion of BDR_FEV1 was negatively associated with the degree of airflow obstruction, while BDR_FVC was positively associated (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with 2005-BDR+, the proportion of 2021-BDR+ reduced markedly in patients with asthma and COPD, but their trends with the degree of airflow obstruction did not change. Patients with consistent BDR+ had higher initial FEV₁%pred and FVC%pred.