High-Dose Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: A Multicenter Phase II Trial

The antimicrobial effects of nitric oxide: A narrative review

Nitric oxide (NO) is a versatile endogenous molecule with multiple physiological roles, including neurotransmission, vasodilation, and immune regulation. As part of the immune response, NO exerts antimicrobial effects by producing reactive nitrogen species (RNS). These RNS combat pathogens via mechanisms such as DNA deamination, S-nitrosylation of thiol groups, and lipid peroxidation, leading to disruptions in microbial cell membranes and vital protein functions. Due to these broad actions, NO targets many pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, with minimal risk of resistance development. Given its potent antimicrobial properties, the therapeutic potential of exogenous NO has been recently studied. Various preparations, such as NO donors, inhaled gaseous NO, and topical preparations, have shown promising results in preclinical and clinical settings. This literature review examines the antimicrobial effects of exogenous NO reported in in vitro studies, animal models, and human clinical trials. We provide an overview of the mechanisms by which NO exerts its antimicrobial activity, highlighting its efficacy against diverse pathogens. By presenting the current findings, we aim to contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of NO as a versatile antimicrobial agent in clinical practice.

Managing Refractory Hypoxemia in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Obese Patients with Veno-Venous Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is a life-saving intervention for severe respiratory failure unresponsive to conventional therapies. However, managing refractory hypoxemia in morbidly obese patients poses significant challenges due to the unique physiological characteristics of this population, including hyperdynamic circulation, elevated cardiac output, and increased oxygen consumption. These factors can limit the effectiveness of vvECMO by diluting arterial oxygen content and complicating oxygen delivery. Refractory hypoxemia in obese patients supported by vvECMO often stems from an imbalance between ECMO blood flow and cardiac output. Hyperdynamic circulation exacerbates the recirculation of oxygenated blood and impairs the efficiency of oxygen transfer. To address these challenges, a stepwise, individualized approach is essential. Strategies to reduce oxygen consumption include deep sedation, neuromuscular blockade, and temperature control. Cardiac output modulation can be achieved through beta-blockers and cautious therapeutic hypothermia. Optimizing oxygen delivery involves improving residual lung function; high positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation guided by esophageal pressure monitoring; prone positioning; and adjustments to the ECMO circuit, such as using dual oxygenators, larger membranes, or additional drainage cannulas. This review highlights the interplay of physiological adaptations and technical innovations required to overcome the challenges of managing refractory hypoxemia in obese patients during vvECMO. By addressing the complexities of high cardiac output and obesity, clinicians can enhance the effectiveness of vvECMO and improve outcomes for this high-risk population.

Medium-Term Effect of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients

Background: Nitric oxide (NO) plays a key role in various physiological processes. Inhaled NO (iNO) has been studied for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, interest grew in its potential role for patients with COVID-19 ARDS, with studies showing improved oxygenation over 48 h. Methods: This is a retrospective study of adult patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS and refractory hypoxemia admitted to the medical ICU requiring mechanical ventilation and treated with iNO. The effect on oxygenation, respiratory, and ventilation parameters is measured. Significant improvement is defined as an increase in PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 20% from a baseline. Results: This study includes 87 patients (55 men, mean age 58.7 ± 15.2) with 164 iNO connections (mean 1.9 per patient). iNO is independently associated with a significant PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement, with an OR of 1.26 (95% CI 1.09-1.46), even after accounting for these potential confounders. The time to maximal PaO2/FiO2 improvement is 14.5 ± 5.0 h for men and 78.5 ± 5.5 h for women, with respective ratio increases of 42.5 ± 8.1 and 52.5 ± 13.6 mmHg. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that severe ARDS COVID-19 patients may benefit from inhaled nitric oxide, with delayed oxygenation improvements lasting up to 96 h and slower responses observed in women, raising the possibility that current guidelines against its use could be reconsidered.

Immunometabolic Effect of Nitric Oxide on Human Macrophages Challenged With the SARS-CoV2-Induced Cytokine Storm. A Fluxomic Approach

The cytokine storm associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection is one of the most distinctive pathological signatures in COVID-19 patients. Macrophages respond to this pro-inflammatory challenge by reprogramming their functional and metabolic phenotypes. Interestingly, human macrophages fail to express the inducible form of the NO synthase (NOS2) in response to pro-inflammatory activation and, therefore, NO is not synthesized by these cells. The contribution of exogenously added NO, via a chemical NO-donor, on the immunometabolic changes associated with the cytokine storm is investigated. By using metabolic, transcriptomic, and functional assays the effect of NO in human macrophages is evaluated and found specific responses. Moreover, through integrative fluxomic analysis, pathways modified by NO that contribute to the expression of a particular phenotype in human macrophages are identified, which includes a decrease in mitochondrial respiration and TCA with a slight increase in the glycolytic flux. A significant ROS increase and preserved cell viability are observed in the presence of NO, which may ease the inflammatory response and host defense. Also, NO reverses the cytokine storm-induced itaconate accumulation. These changes offer additional clues to understanding the potential crosstalk between NO and the COVID-19 cytokine storm-dependent signaling pathways.

Representation of Hispanic Patients in Clinical Trials for Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Hispanic individuals comprise one-fifth of the U.S. population and Hispanic patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) experience higher odds of death compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Representation of Hispanic patients in clinical trials for respiratory failure is critical to address this inequity. We conducted a systematic review to examine the inclusion of Hispanic patients in randomized controlled trials for AHRF and assessed language as a potential barrier to enrollment.

DATA SOURCES

National Library of Medicine PubMed, Elsevier Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through January 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials assessing AHRF interventions enrolling U.S. patients receiving mechanical ventilation, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula were included. The systematic review was registered prospectively through PROSPERO (CRD42023437828).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently screened studies and extracted data for each included study.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ninety-four trials published from 1975 to 2023 were included; 33.0% (n = 31) of studies reported ethnicity, and 11.2% of participants in studies reporting race or ethnicity (1,320/11,780) were identified as Hispanic. The proportion of Hispanic-identified participants was significantly lower than the U.S. Hispanic population from 1996 to 2019 (p < 0.01). Starting in 2020, the proportion of Hispanic-identified participants was significantly higher than the U.S. population (27.8% vs. 19.1%; p < 0.01). Two studies (4.9%) reporting race or ethnicity excluded non-English speaking participants; the remainder did not specify language requirements for enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic-identified individuals were underrepresented in trials for AHRF until 2020 when Hispanic patient representation increased during COVID-19. Exclusion of participants who do not speak English may represent a barrier to trial enrollment.

Cross-sectional evaluation of medical reversals among National Institute of Health guideline practices implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic: how often did experts err in a time of crisis?

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic required the rapid and often widespread implementation of medical practices without robust data. Many of these practices have since been tested in large, randomised trials and were found to be in error. We sought to identify incorrect recommendations, or reversals, among National Institute of Health COVID-19 guidelines and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals and authorisations.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Recommended medical practices and FDA authorisations or approvals for COVID-19 prevention, treatment and/or management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The frequency and characteristics of COVID-19 medical reversals, defined as practices that were implemented and/or recommended during the pandemic, but were later tested in randomised trials that failed to find benefit.

RESULTS

We found 332 COVID-19 recommendations. 85 (25.6%) opposed a medical practice, 23 (6.9%) were to continue a pre-COVID standard of care without deviation and 224 (67.5%) reccommended a new medical practice. We found randomised trials assessing 72 of these practices (32.1%), among which 25 (35%) were found to be in error and deemed medical reversals. Among medical reversals, 21 (84%) were prescription medications and 1 (4%) was convalescent plasma. 17 (68%) were repurposed medications. Two (8%) were procedures or mechanical interventions and one (4%) was a device. 16 (64%) reversals pertained to the hospital setting (4 to intensive care units), 4 (16%) were non-specific (ie, applicable to any setting), 4 (16%) pertained to a non-hospital setting and 1 pertained to healthcare workers.

CONCLUSION

When faced with a novel pandemic, policymakers rapidly made hundreds of specific medical recommendations. More than two out of three were never robustly tested. Among practices tested in a randomised fashion, one in three was made in error. Pandemic recommendation errors were substantial. Early and coordinated efforts to initiate randomised trials, even during dire situations, may mitigate the perpetuation of ineffective practices.

Impact of low dose inhaled nitric oxide treatment in spontaneously breathing and intubated COVID-19 patients: a retrospective propensity-matched study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy in the setting of COVID-19-related ARDS is obscure. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the impact of iNO on patients with COVID-19 who require respiratory support.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included COVID-19 patients enrolled in the SCCM VIRUS COVID-19 registry who were admitted to different Mayo Clinic sites between March 2020 and June 2022 and required high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Patients were included in the 'spontaneously breathing' group if they remained non-intubated or were initiated on an HFNC (± NIV) before intubation. Patients who got intubated without prior use of an HFNC (± NIV) were included in the 'intubated group.' They were further divided into categories based on their iNO usage. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse propensity of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to examine outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 2767 patients included in our analysis, 1879 belonged to spontaneously breathing (153 received iNO), and 888 belonged to the intubated group (193 received iNO). There was a consistent improvement in FiO2 requirement, P/F ratio, and respiratory rate within 48 h of iNO use among both spontaneously breathing and intubated groups. However, there was no significant difference in intubation risk with iNO use among spontaneously breathing patients (PSM OR 1.08, CI 0.71-1.65; IPTW OR 1.10, CI 0.90-1.33). In a time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazard model, spontaneously breathing patients initiated on iNO had a lower hazard ratio of in-hospital mortality (PSM HR 0.49, CI 0.32-0.75, IPTW HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62) but intubated patients did not (PSM HR: 0.90; CI 0.66-1.24, IPTW HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.31). iNO use was associated with longer in-hospital stays, ICU stays, ventilation duration, and a higher incidence of creatinine rise.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective propensity-score matched study showed that spontaneously breathing COVID-19 patients on HFNC/ NIV support had a decreased in-hospital mortality risk with iNO use in a time-to-event analysis. Both intubated and spontaneously breathing patients had improvement in oxygenation parameters with iNO therapy but were associated with longer in-hospital stays, ICU stays, ventilation duration, and higher incidence of creatinine rise.

Impact of airway closure and lung collapse on inhaled nitric oxide effect in acute lung injury: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of inhaled therapy such as Nitric Oxide (iNO) during mechanical ventilation may depend on airway patency. We hypothesized that airway closure and lung collapse, countered by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), influence iNO efficacy. This could support the role of an adequate PEEP titration for inhalation therapy. The main aim of this study was to assess the effect of iNO with PEEP set above or below the airway opening pressure (AOP) generated by airway closure, on hemodynamics and gas exchange in swine models of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Fourteen pigs randomly underwent either bilateral or asymmetrical two-hit model of lung injury. Airway closure and lung collapse were measured with electrical impedance tomography as well as ventilation/perfusion ratio (V/Q). After AOP detection, the effect of iNO (10ppm) was studied with PEEP set randomly above or below regional AOP. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and gas-exchange were recorded.

RESULTS

All pigs presented airway closure (AOP > 0.5cmH2O) after injury. In bilateral injury, iNO was associated with an improved mean pulmonary pressure from 49 ± 8 to 42 ± 7mmHg; (p = 0.003), and ventilation/perfusion matching, caused by a reduction in pixels with low V/Q and shunt from 16%[IQR:13-19] to 9%[IQR:4-12] (p = 0.03) only at PEEP set above AOP. iNO had no effect on hemodynamics or gas exchange for PEEP below AOP (low V/Q 25%[IQR:16-30] to 23%[IQR:14-27]; p = 0.68). In asymmetrical injury, iNO improved pulmonary hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion matching independently from the PEEP set. iNO was associated with improved oxygenation in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In an animal model of bilateral lung injury, PEEP level relative to AOP markedly influences iNO efficacy on pulmonary hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion match, independently of oxygenation.

Assessment of continuous low-dose and high-dose burst of inhaled nitric oxide in spontaneously breathing COVID-19 patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) showed to improve oxygenation at low doses by reducing intrapulmonary shunt and to display antiviral properties at high doses. To assess the safety and potential benefits, we designed an exploratory clinical trial comparing low-dose with intermittent high-dose iNO to only intermittent high-dose iNO in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

In this single-center interventional non-inferiority randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04476992), twenty oxygen-dependent COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to the high-dose (200 ppm for 30 min) + continuous low-dose (20 ppm) iNO group (iNO200/20) or the high-dose iNO group (iNO200). Methemoglobinemia (MetHb) assessed 48 h after iNO initiation was the primary endpoint. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2, inflammatory markers during hospitalization, and heart ultrasounds during the iNO200 treatments were evaluated.

RESULTS

MetHb difference between iNO groups remained within the non-inferiority limit of 3 %, indicating comparable treatments despite being statistically different (p-value<0.01). Both groups presented similar SpO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 h (iNO200 vs. iNO200/20 341[334-356] vs. 359 [331-380], respectively, p-value = 0.436). Both groups showed the same time to SARS-CoV-2 negativization, hospital length of stay, and recovery time. iNO-treated patients showed quicker SARS-CoV-2 negativization compared to a similar group of non-iNO patients (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.04-6.33). During the 228 treatments, iNO200 and iNO200/20 groups were comparable for safety, hemodynamic stability, and respiratory function improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

iNO200/20 and iNO200 are equally safe in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-induced respiratory failure with regards to MetHb and NO2. Larger studies should investigate whether iNO200/20 leads to better outcomes compared to non-iNO treated patients.

A safety evaluation of intermittent high-dose inhaled nitric oxide in viral pneumonia due to COVID-19: a randomised clinical study

High-dose inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, vasodilator, and antimicrobial properties, resulting in improved arterial oxygenation as well as a beneficial therapeutic effect on lower respiratory tract infections. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 150-ppm intermittent iNO administered with a novel iNO-generator, for treating adults hospitalised for viral pneumonia. In this prospective, open-label, multicenter study, subjects aged 18-80, diagnosed with viral pneumonia received either standard supportive treatment alone (Control-Group) or combined with iNO for 40 min, 4 times per day up to 7 days (Treatment-Group). Out of 40 recruited subjects, 35 were included in the intention-to-treat population (34 with COVID-19). Adverse Events rate was similar between the groups (56.3% vs. 42.1%; respectively). No treatment-related adverse events were reported, while 2 serious adverse events were accounted for by underlying pre-existing conditions. Among the Treatment-Group, oxygen support duration was reduced by 2.7 days (Hazard Ratio = 2.8; p = 0.0339), a greater number of subjects reached oxygen saturation ≥ 93% within hospitalisation period (Hazard Ratio = 5.4; p = 0.049), and a trend for earlier discharge was demonstrated. Intermittent 150-ppm iNO-treatment is well-tolerated, safe, and beneficial compared to usual care for spontaneously breathing hospitalised adults diagnosed with COVID-19 viral pneumonia.

Role of NO in Disease: Good, Bad or Ugly

This Special Issue of Biomedicines (https://www [...].

Imaging the pulmonary vasculature in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by a redistribution of regional lung perfusion that impairs gas exchange. While speculative, experimental evidence suggests that perfusion redistribution may contribute to regional inflammation and modify disease progression. Unfortunately, tools to visualize and quantify lung perfusion in patients with ARDS are lacking. This review explores recent advances in perfusion imaging techniques that aim to understand the pulmonary circulation in ARDS. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography captures first-pass kinetics of intravenously injected dye during continuous scan acquisitions. Different contrast characteristics and kinetic modeling have improved its topographic measurement of pulmonary perfusion with high spatial and temporal resolution. Dual-energy computed tomography can map the pulmonary blood volume of the whole lung with limited radiation exposure, enabling its application in clinical research. Electrical impedance tomography can obtain serial topographic assessments of perfusion at the bedside in response to treatments such as inhaled nitric oxide and prone position. Ongoing technological improvements and emerging techniques will enhance lung perfusion imaging and aid its incorporation into the care of patients with ARDS.

Case report: Inhaled nitric oxide rescued a hypoxemia patient caused by dermatomyositis complicated with interstitial pneumonia

Interstitial pneumonia is the most common and serious secondary lesion of dermatomyositis. In some cases, patients may develop severe acute pneumonia that can quickly progress to respiratory failure, resulting in high mortality rates. A 57-year-old woman with dermatomyositis and interstitial pulmonary fibrosis experienced severe hypoxemia due to pulmonary infection. Despite receiving various treatments after entering the intensive care unit (ICU), such as anti-infection therapy, lung recruitment, prone position ventilation, sedative and muscle relaxation, the patient's oxygen saturation continued to decline. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) monitoring revealed that prone position could not improve ventilation homogeneity. However, the patient's ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) matching significantly improved 10 min after initiation of supine position ventilation combined with inhalation of nitric oxide (iNO). The patient's PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio increased from 86 mmHg to 150 mmHg at 30 min post-treatment. iNO treatment continued for 2 days. Then the patient's condition improved and she was successfully weaned off the ventilator with rigorous monitoring and symptomatic care. The implementation of mechanical ventilation combined with iNO therapy rapidly improved V/Q matching and oxygenation in a patient with hypoxemia caused by dermatomyositis complicated with interstitial pneumonia. This approach successfully avoided the need for invasive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support.

Novel nitric oxide donors are coronary vasodilators that also bind to the papain-like protease of SARS-CoV-2

Several investigational nitric oxide donors were originally created to correct vascular endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases. These 48 compounds contain an urea-like moiety attached to the well-known NO donors isosorbide 2- and 5-mononitrate. CR-0305 and CR-0202 were synthesized and found to be nontoxic in the cell lines HMEC-1, A549/hACE2 and VeroE6. CR-0305 induced vasodilation in human coronary arteries ex vivo. Since NO can also have antiviral properties, a study of drug-protein interactions with SARS-CoV-2 was undertaken using in silico modeling. CR-0305 experimentally outperformed the other compounds, including CR-0202, in binding the catalytic site of SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro). PLpro is a primary target for therapeutic inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 as it mediates viral replication and modulates host innate immune responses. CR-0305 is predicted to sit firmly in the PLpro catalytic pocket as confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations, wherein stability of binding to the catalytic site of PLpro induces a conformational change in the BL2 loop to a more closed conformation as observed previously with GRL0617. Surface plasmon resonance was performed with CR-0305 and CR-0202 to characterize binding affinity to purified SARS-CoV-2 PLpro protein. CR-0305 and CR-0202 also inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to vehicle as measured by virus N protein staining with a specific antibody in A549-ACE2 and VeroE6 cells at 20 µM. CR-0305 is a coronary vasodilator that appears to bind to the catalytic site of the PLpro of SARS-CoV-2 while targeting delivery of antiviral NO to cells infected by SARS-CoV-2, suggesting multiple indications for future development.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide ReDuce postoperatIve pulmoNAry complicaTions in patiEnts with recent COVID-19 infection (INORDINATE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A history of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Even mild PPCs can elevate the rates of early postoperative mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and prolong the length of ICU and/or hospital stays. Consequently, it is crucial to develop perioperative management strategies that can mitigate these increased risks in surgical patients who have recently been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Accumulating evidence suggests that nitric oxide (NO) inhalation might be effective in treating COVID-19. NO functions in COVID-19 by promoting vasodilation, anticoagulation, anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects. Therefore, our study hypothesises that the perioperative use of NO can effectively reduce PPCs in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

A prospective, double-blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial is proposed. The trial aims to include participants who are planning to undergo surgery with general anaesthesia and have been recently infected with SARS-CoV-2 (within 7 weeks). Stratified allocation of eligible patients will be performed at a 1:1 ratio based on the predicted risk of PPCs using the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia risk index and the time interval between infection and surgery.The primary outcome of the study will be the presence of PPCs within the first 7 days following surgery, including respiratory infection, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm and aspiration pneumonitis. The primary outcome will be reported as counts (percentage) and will be compared using a two-proportion χ2 test. The common effect across all primary components will be estimated using a multiple generalised linear model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xijing Hospital (KY20232058-F1). The findings, including positive, negative and inconclusive results, will be published in scientific journals with peer-review processes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05721144.

Unraveling the impact of nitric oxide, almitrine, and their combination in COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis) patients: a systematic review

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a large number of critically ill and severe COVID-19 patients meet the diagnostic criteria for sepsis and even septic shock. The treatments for COVID-19 patients with sepsis are still very limited. For sepsis, improving ventilation is one of the main treatments. Nitric oxide (NO) and almitrine have been reported to improve oxygenation in patients with "classical" sepsis. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NO, almitrine, and the combination of both for COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis) patients. Method: A systematic search was performed on Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, case series, and case reports in COVID-19 patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis were performed. Study characteristics, patient demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from eligible articles. Results: A total of 35 studies representing 1,701 patients met eligibility criteria. Inhaled NO did not affect the mortality (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.33-2.8, I2 = 81%, very low certainty), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.04-1.17, I2 = 83%, very low certainty), and intubation needs (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34-1.93, I2 = 56%, very low certainty) of patients with COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis). Meanwhile, almitrine did not affect the mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.13, low certainty), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.29-0.29, low certainty), intubation needs (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.5-1.79, low certainty), and SAEs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63-2.15, low certainty). Compared with pre-administration, the PaO2/FiO2 of patients with NO (SMD-0.87, 95% CI -1.08-0.66, I2 = 0%, very low certainty), almitrine (SMD-0.73, 95% CI-1.06-0.4, I2 = 1%, very low certainty), and the combination of both (SMD-0.94, 95% CI-1.71-0.16, I2 = 47%, very low certainty) increased significantly. Conclusion: Inhaled NO, almitrine, and the combination of the two drugs improved oxygenation significantly, but did not affect the patients' mortality, hospitalization duration, and intubation needs. Almitrine did not significantly increase the patients' SAEs. Well-designed high-quality studies are needed for establishing a stronger quality of evidence. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=367667, identifier CRD42022367667.