Identification and characterization of glima 38, a glycosylated islet cell membrane antigen, which together with GAD65 and IA2 marks the early phases of autoimmune response in type 1 diabetes

Limbic encephalitis

Limbic encephalitis (LE) is a clinical syndrome defined by subacutely evolving limbic signs and symptoms with structural and functional evidence of mediotemporal damage in the absence of a better explanation than an autoimmune (or paraneoplastic) cause. There are features common to all forms of LE. In recent years, antibody(ab)-defined subtypes have been established. They are distinct regarding underlying pathophysiologic processes, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging courses, cerebrospinal fluid signatures, treatment responsivity, and likelihood of a chronic course. With immunotherapy, LE with abs against surface antigens has a better outcome than LE with abs to intracellular antigens. Diagnostic and treatment challenges are, on the one hand, to avoid overlooking and undertreatment and, on the other hand, to avoid overdiagnoses and overtreatment. LE can be conceptualized as a model disease for the consequences of new onset mediotemporal damage by different mechanisms in adult life. It may be studied as an example of mediotemporal epileptogenesis.

Autoimmunity to tetraspanin-7 in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease whereby components of insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cells are targeted by the adaptive immune system leading to the destruction of these cells and insulin deficiency. There is much interest in the development of antigen-specific immune intervention as an approach to prevent disease development in individuals identified as being at risk of disease. It is now recognised that there are multiple targets of the autoimmune response in type 1 diabetes, the most recently identified being a member of the tetraspanin family, tetraspanin-7. The heterogeneity of autoimmune responses to different target antigens complicates the assessment of diabetes risk by the detection of autoantibodies, as well as creating challenges for the design of strategies to intervene in the immune response to these autoantigens. This review describes the discovery of tetraspanin-7 as a target of autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes and how the detection of autoantibodies to the protein provides a valuable marker for future loss of pancreatic beta-cell function.

Birth and coming of age of islet autoantibodies

This review takes the reader through 45 years of islet autoantibody research, from the discovery of islet‐cell antibodies in 1974 to today’s population‐based screening for presymptomatic early‐stage type 1 diabetes. The review emphasizes the current practical value of, and factors to be considered in, the measurement of islet autoantibodies.

Tetraspanin 7 autoantibodies predict progressive decline of beta cell function in individuals with LADA

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this work was to investigate whether tetraspanin 7 autoantibodies (TSPAN7A) are valuable in predicting poor beta cell function in individuals with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA).

METHODS

The cross-sectional study involved participants with LADA (n = 173), type 1 diabetes (n = 158), type 2 diabetes (n = 204) and healthy control participants (n = 170). The longitudinal study involved 53 participants with LADA, with a 3-year follow-up. In both cohorts, TSPAN7A in the sera were measured by a luciferase immunoprecipitation system assay, and physical and clinical characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS

The prevalence of TSPAN7A in LADA, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and healthy control participants was 21.4% (37/173), 26% (41/158), 0.5% (1/204) and 1.2% (2/170), respectively. Importantly, measurement of TSPAN7A significantly increased the number of individuals with LADA found to be positive for multiple antibodies (32.4% vs 22%; p < 0.001). Further logistic regression analysis demonstrated that positivity for TSPAN7A (OR 2.87, p = 0.034), disease duration (OR 1.83, p = 0.019) and GAD antibody titre (OR 2.67, p = 0.009) were risk factors for beta cell function in LADA, while BMI (OR 0.34, p = 0.001) was a protective factor. In the prospective study in individuals with LADA, the median annual decrease in rates of fasting C-peptide and 2 h postprandial C-peptide in individuals who were positive for TSPAN7A was significantly higher when compared with the decrease in those who were negative for TSPAN7A (34.6% vs 7.9%, p = 0.043 and 33.2% vs 11%, p = 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

TSPAN7A are valid islet autoantibodies for use in East Asian populations with autoimmune diabetes and can discriminate individuals with LADA who have lower beta cell function after disease progression.

Tetraspanin 7 autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Autoantibodies to pancreatic beta cell proteins are markers of asymptomatic type 1 diabetes. The aim was to determine whether autoantibodies to the beta cell protein tetraspanin 7 would improve the ability to identify autoimmunity against pancreatic beta cells.

METHODS

Full length and external domain fragments of tetraspanin 7 were expressed as luciferase-tagged fusion proteins and used in immunoprecipitation assays to measure autoantibodies in samples from 363 patients with type 1 diabetes at onset of disease, 503 beta cell autoantibody negative first-degree relatives of patients, and 212 relatives with autoantibodies to insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, insulinoma antigen 2 or zinc transporter 8.

RESULTS

Antibody binding was observed against the full length and external domains of tetraspanin 7, and was strongest against the full length protein. Autoantibodies that could be inhibited by untagged tetraspanin 7 were detected in 5 (1%) of 503 autoantibody negative relatives, 3 (3.2%) of 94 autoantibody negative patients, 95 (35.3%) of 269 autoantibody positive patients, 1 (1%) of 98 single autoantibody positive relatives and 25 (21.9%) of 114 multiple autoantibody positive relatives. Progression to diabetes did not differ between multiple autoantibody positive relatives with and without tetraspanin 7 autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Tetraspanin 7 is an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Tetraspanin 7 autoantibodies are a marker of type 1 diabetes, but provide minor additional value to existing autoantibodies in identifying beta cell autoimmunity.

Identification of Tetraspanin-7 as a Target of Autoantibodies in Type 1 Diabetes

The presence of autoantibodies to multiple-islet autoantigens confers high risk for the development of type 1 diabetes. Four major autoantigens are established (insulin, glutamate decarboxylase, IA2, and zinc transporter-8), but the molecular identity of a fifth, a 38-kDa membrane glycoprotein (Glima), is unknown. Glima antibodies have been detectable only by immunoprecipitation from extracts of radiolabeled islet or neuronal cells. We sought to identify Glima to enable efficient assay of these autoantibodies. Mouse brain and lung were shown to express Glima. Membrane glycoproteins from extracts of these organs were enriched by detergent phase separation, lectin affinity chromatography, and SDS-PAGE. Proteins were also immunoaffinity purified from brain extracts using autoantibodies from the sera of patients with diabetes before SDS-PAGE. Eluates from gel regions equivalent to 38 kDa were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for protein identification. Three proteins were detected in samples from the brain and lung extracts, and in the immunoaffinity-purified sample, but not in the negative control. Only tetraspanin-7, a multipass transmembrane glycoprotein with neuroendocrine expression, had physical characteristics expected of Glima. Tetraspanin-7 was confirmed as an autoantigen by demonstrating binding to autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes. We identify tetraspanin-7 as a target of autoimmunity in diabetes, allowing its exploitation for diabetes prediction and immunotherapy.

Role of immune system in type 1 diabetes mellitus pathogenesis

The immune system is the body's natural defense system against invading pathogens. It protects the body from infection and works to communicate an individual's well-being through a complex network of interconnected cells and cytokines. This system is an associated host defense. An uncontrolled immune system has the potential to trigger negative complications in the host. Type 1 diabetes results from the destruction of pancreatic β-cells by a β-cell-specific autoimmune process. Examples of β-cell autoantigens are insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, tyrosine phosphatase, and insulinoma antigen. There are many autoimmune diseases, but type 1 diabetes mellitus is one of the well-characterized autoimmune diseases. The mechanisms involved in the β-cell destruction are still not clear; it is generally believed that β-cell autoantigens, macrophages, dendritic cells, B lymphocytes, and T lymphocytes are involved in the β-cell-specific autoimmune process. It is necessary to determine what exact factors are causing the immune system to become unregulated in such a manner as to promote an autoimmune response.

Novel biomarkers in type 1 diabetes

Biomarkers are useful tools for research into type 1 diabetes (T1D) for a number of purposes, including elucidation of disease pathogenesis, risk prediction, and therapeutic monitoring. Susceptibility genes and islet autoantibodies are currently the most useful biomarkers for T1D risk prediction. However, these markers do not fully meet the needs of scientists and physicians for several reasons. First, improvement of the specificity and sensitivity is still desirable to achieve better positive predictive values. Second, autoantibodies appear relatively late in the disease process, thus limiting their value in early disease prediction. Third, the currently available biomarkers are not useful for assessing therapeutic outcomes because some are not involved in the disease process (autoantibodies) and others do not change during disease progression (susceptibility genes). Therefore, considerable effort has been devoted to the discovery of novel T1D biomarkers in the last three decades. The advent of high-throughput technologies for genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies has allowed genome-wide examinations of genetic polymorphisms, global gene changes, and protein expression changes in T1D patients and prediabetic subjects. These large-scale studies resulted in the discovery of a large number of susceptibility genes and changes in gene and protein expression. While these studies have provided a number of novel biomarker candidates, their clinical benefits remain to be evaluated in prospective studies, and no new "star biomarker" has been identified until now. Previous studies suggest that significant improvements in study design and analytical methodologies have to be made to identify clinically relevant biomarkers. In this review, we discuss progress, opportunities, challenges, and future directions in the development of T1D biomarkers, mainly by focusing on the genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic aspects.

An update on the use of NOD mice to study autoimmune (Type 1) diabetes

The widely used nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of autoimmune (Type 1) diabetes mellitus shares multiple characteristics with the human disease, and studies employing this model continue to yield clinically relevant and important information. Here, we review some of the recent key findings obtained from NOD mouse investigations that have both advanced our understanding of disease pathogenesis and suggested new therapeutic targets and approaches. Areas discussed include antigen discovery, identification of genes and pathways contributing to disease susceptibility, development of strategies to image islet inflammation and the testing of therapeutics. We also review recent technical advances that, combined with an improved understanding of the NOD mouse model's limitations, should work to ensure its popularity, utility and relevance in the years ahead.

Prediction and prevention of Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Type 1A diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is caused by autoimmune islet β-cell destruction with consequent severe insulin deficiency. We can now predict the development of T1DM by determining four biochemically characterized islet autoantibodies, namely those antibodies against insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase 65, insulinoma antigen (IA)-2 (ICA512) and the zinc transporter ZnT8. We can also prevent T1DM in animal models, but the final goal is the prevention of T1DM in humans. Multiple clinical trials are underway investigating methods to prevent β-cell destruction.

Autoimmune markers in diabetes

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) results from cell-mediated autoimmune destruction of the β cells of the islets of Langerhans. Autoantibodies directed against the islets are useful clinical tools that allow the recognition and confirmation of β-cell autoimmunity.

CONTENT

In this review we define the term "islet autoantibody," describe the pathogenesis of autoantibody generation, and explain the uses of islet autoantibodies in clinical medicine and in research studies that concern the interruption or prevention of T1DM. We also discuss the biology of islet autoantibodies and their rates of appearance at the time of onset of T1DM and their appearance before the development of T1DM.

SUMMARY

The presence of islet autoantibodies in persons with diabetes confirms an autoimmune etiology. In nondiabetic individuals, islet autoantibodies are strong predictors of the later development of T1DM.

Approaches in type 1 diabetes research: A status report

Type 1 diabetes is a multifactorial disease with an early age of onset, in which the insulin producing beta cell of the pancreas are destroyed because of autoimmunity. It is the second most common chronic disease in children and account for 5% to 10% of all diagnosed cases of diabetes. India is having an incidence of 10.6 cases/year/100,000, and recent studies indicate that the prevalence of type 1 diabetes in India is increasing. However in view of poor health care network, there is no monitoring system in the country. Of the 18 genomic intervals implicated for the risk to develop type 1 diabetes, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region on chromosome 6p21.31 has been the major contributor estimated to account for 40-50%, followed by 10% frequency of INS-VNTR at 5' flanking region of the insulin gene on chromosome 11p15.5. However, population studies suggest that > 95% of type 1 diabetes have HLA-DR3 or DR4, or both, and in family studies, sibling pairs affected with type 1 diabetes have a non-random distribution of shared HLA haplotypes. As predisposing genetic factors such as HLA alleles are known, immunological interventions to prevent type 1 diabetes are of great interest. In the present study we have reviewed the status of molecular genetics of the disease and the approaches that need to be adopted in terms of developing patient and suitable control cohorts in the country.

Immunology of beta-cell destruction

The pancreatic islet beta-cells are the target for an autoimmune process that eventually results in an inability to control blood glucose due to the lack of insulin. The different steps that eventually lead to the complete loss of the beta-cells are reviewed to include the very first step of a triggering event that initiates the development of beta-cell autoimmunity to the last step of appearance of islet-cell autoantibodies, which may mark that insulitis is about to form. The observations that the initial beta-cell destruction by virus or other environmental factors triggers islet autoimmunity not in the islets but in the draining pancreatic lymph nodes are reviewed along with possible basic mechanisms of loss of tolerance to islet autoantigens. Once islet autoimmunity is established the question is how beta-cells are progressively killed by autoreactive lymphocytes which eventually results in chronic insulitis. Many of these series of events have been dissected in spontaneously diabetic mice or rats, but controlled clinical trials have shown that rodent observations are not always translated into mechanisms in humans. Attempts are therefore needed to clarify the step 1 triggering mechanisms and the step to chronic autoimmune insulitis to develop evidence-based treatment approaches to prevent type 1 diabetes.

Unraveling the Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes with Proteomics: Present And Future Directions

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the result of selective destruction of the insulin-producing beta-cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans. T1D is due to a complex interplay between the beta-cell, the immune system, and the environment in genetically susceptible individuals. The initiating mechanism(s) behind the development of T1D are largely unknown, and no genes or proteins are specific for most T1D cases. Different pro-apoptotic cytokines, IL-1 beta in particular, are present in the islets during beta-cell destruction and are able to modulate beta-cell function and induce beta-cell death. In beta-cells exposed to IL-1 beta, a race between destructive and protective events are initiated and in susceptible individuals the deleterious events prevail. Proteins are involved in most cellular processes, and it is thus expected that their cumulative expression profile reflects the specific activity of cells. Proteomics may be useful in describing the protein expression profile and thus the diabetic phenotype. Relatively few studies using proteomics technologies to investigate the T1D pathogenesis have been published to date despite the defined target organ, the beta-cell. Proteomics has been applied in studies of differentiating beta-cells, cytokine exposed islets, dietary manipulated islets, and in transplanted islets. Although that the studies have revealed a complex and detailed picture of the protein expression profiles many functional implications remain to be answered. In conclusion, a rather detailed picture of protein expression in beta-cell lines, islets, and transplanted islets both in vitro and in vivo have been described. The data indicate that the beta-cell is an active participant in its own destruction during diabetes development. No single protein alone seems to be responsible for the development of diabetes. Rather the cumulative pattern of changes seems to be what favors a transition from dynamic stability in the unperturbed beta-cell to dynamic instability and eventually to beta-cell destruction.

A comprehensive guide to antibody and T-cell responses in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an organ-specific autoimmune disease in which the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreatic islets are selectively eliminated. T cells specific for beta-cell antigens are the mediators of this precise cellular destruction. However, antibodies to beta-cell proteins are also generated and may be used for predicting disease in at-risk populations. Over the past two decades, numerous beta-cell proteins and lipids have been implicated as autoantigens in patients or in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice, a well-studied animal model of T1D. Here, we present a review of these antigens, accompanied by their T-cell epitopes, where known, and a discussion of our current understanding of why particular self-proteins become disease-inciting antigens. Although two dozen beta-cell antigens have been identified to date, few of these have been confirmed to be recognized by pathogenic T cells early in the disease process. Further identification and characterization of initiating beta-cell antigens targeted by pathogenic T cells should be a priority for future studies.

Autoimmune diabetes: ongoing development of immunological intervention strategies targeted directly against autoreactive T cells

It is well known that autoimmunity associated with the onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) involves the generation of autoreactive T and B cells. The findings that diabetics mount humoral and cellular immune responses against islet cell antigens (ICAs) have led to the testing of ICAs and their analogs as candidates for therapeutic agents for better treatment of IDDM at its prediabetic and diabetic stages. Apart from this type of approach, various immunological intervention strategies aimed at direct targeting of the autoreactive T cells have also been investigated. The present review covers the ongoing aspects of these developments focusing on the preclinical findings made in NOD (nonobese diabetic) mice which have been commonly used as a disease model for human autoimmune diabetes. Other types of approaches involving the mobilization of regulatory T cells to indirectly control or modulate the pathological activity of autoreactive T cells will not be discussed within this scope.

The role of T-cells in the pathogenesis of Type 1 diabetes: from cause to cure

Type 1 diabetes mellitus results from a T-cell mediated autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells in genetically predisposed individuals. The knowledge of the immunopathogenesis has increased enormously in the last two decades. The contribution of T-cells in the pathogenesis is beyond doubt. Therapies directed against T-cells have been shown to halt the disease process and prevent recurrent beta-cell destruction after islet transplantation. Less is known about the nature and function of these T-cells, the cause of the loss of tolerance to islet autoantigens, why the immune system apparently fails to suppress autoreactivity, and whether (or which) autoantigen(s) are critically involved in the initiation or progression of the disease. The contribution of dendritic cells in directing the immune response is clear, while the contribution of B-cells and autoantibodies is subject to reconsideration. Autoreactive T-cells have proven to be valuable tools to study pathogenic or diabetes-related processes. Measuring T-cell autoreactivity has also provided critical information to determine the fate of islet allografts transplanted to Type 1 diabetic patients. Cellular autoimmunity is a difficult study subject, but it has been a worthwhile quest to unravel the role of T-cells in the pathogenesis of Type 1 diabetes. The challenge for the future is to determine which factors contribute to the loss of tolerance to beta-cell antigens, and to define what measures T-cells can provide to suppress autoreactivity, since it is becoming increasingly evident that T-cells provide a two-edged sword: some T-cells could be pathogenic, but others can regulate the disease process and thus form new targets for immunointervention.

Evaluation of the new ADA and WHO criteria for classification of diabetes mellitus in young adult people (15-34 yrs) in the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS)

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to evaluate how an aetiology-based classification, as recommended in the ADA and WHO guidelines for classification of diabetes mellitus, matches clinical judgement in the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS), a study covering incident cases of diabetic patients aged 15 to 34 years.

METHODS

During a 1-year period (1998), blood samples were taken at diagnosis and 4 months (median) thereafter. Patients were classified according to clinical judgement by the reporting physicians and assessments of islet antibodies (ICA, GADA, and IA-2A) and plasma C-peptide.

RESULTS

In 1998, 422 patients were registered in DISS. Among the 313 patients participating in the follow-up, most with clinical Type 1 diabetes (185/218, 85%, 95% CI 79-89%) were islet antibody positive (ab+) at diagnosis. In addition, 14 out of 58 (24%, 14-37%) with clinical Type 2 diabetes and 21 out of 37 (57%, 40-73%) with unclassifiable diabetes were antibody positive at diagnosis. Further to this, 4 out of 33 (12%, 3-28%) were antibody negative with clinical Type 1 diabetes and 4 out of 44 (9%, 3-22%) with Type 2 had converted to antibody positive at follow-up. Among those who were constantly antibody negative, 10 out of 29 (34%, 18-54%) with clinical Type 1 and 1 out of 16 (6%, 0-30%) with unclassifiable diabetes had fasting plasma C-peptide concentrations below the normal range (<0.25 nmol/l) at follow-up.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

Most young adults with clinical Type 1 diabetes (199/218, 91%) had objective Type 1 (ab+ at diagnosis/follow-up and/or low fasting plasma C-peptide concentrations at follow-up), as did one third (18/58, 31%) with clinical Type 2 diabetes and more than half (22/37, 59%) with unclassifiable diabetes. About 10% of those who were antibody negative converted to antibody positive. Our study underlines that a classification considering aetiology is superior to clinical judgement.

A 12-year prospective study of the relationship between islet antibodies and beta-cell function at and after the diagnosis in patients with adult-onset diabetes

To clarify the relationships between islet antibodies (islet cell antibody [ICA], GAD antibody [GADA], and IA-2 antibody [IA-2A]) versus the progression of beta-cell dysfunction, we have followed a group of diabetic patients from their diagnosis at 21-73 years of age. Patients with ICA had high levels of GADA and/or IA-2A at diagnosis and a more severe beta-cell dysfunction 5 years after diagnosis than those with only GADA in low concentrations. The aim of the current 12-year follow-up study was to examine the further progression of beta-cell dysfunction in relation to islet antibodies at and after diagnosis. Among 107 patients, complete beta-cell failure 12 years after diagnosis was restricted to those with islet antibodies at diagnosis (16 of 21 [77%] with multiple antibodies and 4 of 5 [80%] with only GADA). In contrast, among antibody-negative patients, fasting P-C-peptide levels were unchanged. Most GADA-positive patients (22 of 27 [81%]) remained GADA positive after 12 years. Associated with decreasing fasting P-C-peptide levels (0.85 nmol/l [0.84] at diagnosis vs. 0.51 nmol/l [0.21] 12 years after diagnosis, P < 0.05), ICA developed after diagnosis in 6 of 105 originally antibody negative mostly overweight patients. In conclusion, multiple islet antibodies or GADA alone at diagnosis of diabetes predict future complete beta-cell failure. After diagnosis, GADA persisted in most patients, whereas ICA development in patients who were antibody negative at diagnosis indicated decreasing beta-cell function.

Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Multiple laboratory tests are used in the diagnosis and management of patients with diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these assays varies substantially.

Approach: An expert committee drafted evidence-based recommendations for the use of laboratory analysis in patients with diabetes. An external panel of experts reviewed a draft of the guidelines, which were modified in response to the reviewers’ suggestions. A revised draft was posted on the Internet and was presented at the AACC Annual Meeting in July, 2000. The recommendations were modified again in response to oral and written comments. The guidelines were reviewed by the Professional Practice Committee of the American Diabetes Association.

Content: Measurement of plasma glucose remains the sole diagnostic criterion for diabetes. Monitoring of glycemic control is performed by the patients, who measure their own plasma or blood glucose with meters, and by laboratory analysis of glycated hemoglobin. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, autoantibodies, microalbumin, proinsulin, C-peptide, and other analytes are addressed.

Summary: The guidelines provide specific recommendations based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes are of minimal clinical value at the present time, and measurement of them is not recommended.

Type 1 diabetes islet autoantibody markers

The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes versus other forms of diabetes such as type 2 diabetes is paramount to guiding proper therapy. Several islet autoantibodies have been identified that serve to diagnose immune-mediated, type 1a diabetes in clinically ambiguous cases. These autoantibodies also serve to predict type 1 diabetes in nondiabetic individuals. The most useful islet autoantibodies include islet cell cytoplasmic autoantibodies, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies, and insulinoma-associated-2 autoantibodies. Once type 1 diabetes can be safely and reliably prevented, large-scale islet autoantibody screening programs of the general pediatric population may be warranted. It is controversial whether islet autoantibodies influence the course of type 1 diabetes following diagnosis.

Autoantibodies to a 38-kDa glycosylated islet cell membrane-associated antigen in (pre)type 1 diabetes: association with IA-2 and islet cell autoantibodies

OBJECTIVE

To study the association of autoantibodies against a 38-kDa glycated islet cell membrane-associated (GLIMA) protein with (pre)type 1 diabetes, patient characteristics, and other immune and genetic markers of the disease and to evaluate the possible added value of GLIMA antibody determinations for disease prediction and classification.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients (n = 100), prediabetic siblings (n = 23), and nondiabetic control subjects (n = 100) were consecutively recruited by the Belgian Diabetes Registry. GLIMA antibodies were determined by immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled islet cell proteins; islet cell antibodies (ICAs) were determined by indirect immunofluorescence; and insulin autoantibodies (IAAs), insulinoma-associated protein-2 antibodies (IA-2As), and GAD antibodies (GADAs) were determined by radioligand assays.

RESULTS

GLIMA antibodies were detected in 38% of type 1 diabetic patients and 35% of prediabetic siblings (during follow-up) vs. 0% in control subjects (P < 0.001). Their prevalence was lower than that of other antibodies and was significantly associated with high levels of IA-2A and ICA (P < 0.0001). In (pre)diabetes, GLIMA antibodies could only be demonstrated in sera positive for > or = 1 other autoantibody.

CONCLUSIONS

GLIMA antibodies are strongly associated with type 1 diabetes and antibody markers of rapid progression to clinical onset but have a lower diagnostic sensitivity for the disease than IAA, ICA, IA-2A, or GADA. In its present form, the GLIMA antibody assay does not provide much additional information for prediction or classification of diabetes, compared with that obtained from the measurement of IA-2As alone or in combination with IAAs, ICAs, and GADAs.

Acute onset of type I diabetes mellitus after severe echovirus 9 infection: putative pathogenic pathways

Enterovirus infections have been implicated in the development of type I diabetes mellitus. They may cause beta cell destruction either by cytolytic infection in the pancreas or indirectly by contributing to autoimmune reactivity. We sought evidence for these 2 mechanisms in a case of acute-onset diabetes mellitus that occurred during severe echovirus 9 infection. The virus was isolated and administered to cultured human beta cells. No viral proliferation was observed, and no beta cell death was induced, while parallel exposure to Coxsackie B virus serotype 3 resulted in viral proliferation and massive beta cell death. Although the viral protein 2C exhibited a sequence similar to that of the beta cell autoantigen glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD(65)), no cross-reactive T cell responses were detected. The patient did not develop antibodies to GAD(65) either. Absence of evidence for direct cytolytic action or an indirect effect through molecular mimicry with GAD(65) in the present case raises the possibility of another indirect pathway through which enteroviruses can cause diabetes mellitus.

The diabetes autoantigen ICA69 and its Caenorhabditis elegans homologue, ric-19, are conserved regulators of neuroendocrine secretion

ICA69 is a diabetes autoantigen with no homologue of known function. Given that most diabetes autoantigens are associated with neuroendocrine secretory vesicles, we sought to determine if this is also the case for ICA69 and whether this protein participates in the process of neuroendocrine secretion. Western blot analysis of ICA69 tissue distribution in the mouse revealed a correlation between expression levels and secretory activity, with the highest expression levels in brain, pancreas, and stomach mucosa. Subcellular fractionation of mouse brain revealed that although most of the ICA69 pool is cytosolic and soluble, a subpopulation is membrane-bound and coenriched with synaptic vesicles. We used immunostaining in the HIT insulin-secreting beta-cell line to show that ICA69 localizes in a punctate manner distinct from the insulin granules, suggesting an association with the synaptic-like microvesicles found in these cells. To pursue functional studies on ICA69, we chose to use the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, for which a homologue of ICA69 exists. We show that the promoter of the C. elegans ICA69 homologue is specifically expressed in all neurons and specialized secretory cells. A deletion mutant was isolated and found to exhibit resistance to the drug aldicarb (an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase), suggesting defective neurotransmitter secretion in the mutant. On the basis of the aldicarb resistance phenotype, we named the gene ric-19 (resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase-19). The resistance to aldicarb was rescued by introducing a ric-19 transgene into the ric-19 mutant background. This is the first study aimed at dissecting ICA69 function, and our results are consistent with the interpretation that ICA69/RIC-19 is an evolutionarily conserved cytosolic protein participating in the process of neuroendocrine secretion via association with certain secretory vesicles.

GAD65 and insulin B chain peptide (9-23) are not primary autoantigens in the type 1 diabetes syndrome of the BB rat

To investigate whether GAD65 whole molecule, GAD65 p35 or insulin B chain peptide (amino acids 9-23) play an essential role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes in the BioBreeding (BB) rat, we gave serial injections of GAD65, p35 or insulin B chain (9-23) to six groups of BB/Worcester rats. The individual antigens were administered either intrathymically on day 2 and intraperitoneally in MF 59-0 adjuvant 5 times during the first 5 weeks, or by intranasal instillation once neonatally and 5 days/week for the following 6 weeks. Control groups were injected with vehicle only. Age of onset of diabetes and degree of insulitis were not different between controls and antigen-treated rats. Rats that received GAD65 intrathymically and intraperitoneally developed high GAD65-antibody titers without altering diabetes development. In GAD65-treated animals, serum antibodies recognized epitopes at 3 sites on GAD65 in diabetic animals but only at 1 site in non-diabetic animals. GAD65-injected animals also showed a significant reduction of IFN-gamma mRNA expression in the thymus. This study provides evidence against the hypothesis that GAD65 and insulin B chain peptide (9-23) are primary diabetogenic autoantigens in BB rats because immunizations with these antigens and GAD65-induced immune deviation did not alter the development of diabetes.

Autoantibodies to multiple islet autoantigens in patients with abrupt onset type 1 diabetes and diabetes diagnosed with urinary glucose screening

It has been reported that there is a heterogeneity in the clinical course of Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. To elucidate the associations of expression of autoantibodies to multiple islet antigens with age of onset and mode of diagnosis of diabetes in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes, autoantibodies against the protein tyrosine phosphatase-like molecules ICA512 (IA-2) and phogrin (IA-2beta) (ICA512/phogrin-A), GAD (GADA), insulin (IAA), and islet cell cytoplasm (ICA) were determined in sera from 73 Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes obtained within 14 days of diagnosis. Patients were divided into groups based on the age of onset (</=10 years, n=24 and >10 years, n=49) or the mode of onset (abrupt onset, n=59 and urinary screening identified, n=14). Of 73 new-onset patients with type 1 diabetes, 43 (59%) and 32 (44%) had ICA512A and phogrin-A levels exceeding the 99th percentile of 184 normal control subjects, respectively. Forty-five patients (62%) were positive for either ICA512A or phogrin-A. The frequencies for other autoantibodies were 71% for GADA, 48% for IAA, and 62% for ICA. The frequency of ICA512/phogrin-A was significantly higher in patients with an age of onset less than 10 years (83%) than in patients aged >10 years (51%, P<0.01). The positivity of ICA512/phogrin-A was less in patients whose diabetes was diagnosed by the urine glucose screening test (21%, P<0.001) than in abrupt onset patients (71%). Combined analysis (>/=1 antibody) of GADA, IAA, and ICA512/phogrin-A detected 88% of abrupt onset and 93% of screening-positive patients vs. 70% and 29%, respectively, for ICA (P<0.0005). These results indicate that the expression of ICA512/phogrin-A and cytoplasmic ICA is less in patients identified by urinary glucose testing but indicate that with combined autoantibody testing 90% of patients can be identified independent of the mode of diagnosis.

Treatment of an autoimmune disease with "classical" T cell veto: a proposal

Immune responses protect against infectious diseases and cancers. In normal circumstances, the immune system is tolerant to self. However, under certain conditions this tolerance is broken. The immune system attacks otherwise normal tissue. An autoimmune disease ensues. Strategies are now being sought that remove the pathogenic T cells without affecting other immune functions. "Classical" veto has been described as an immune suppressive mechanism able to remove T cells in a highly specific and effective manner. The present article briefly reviews the current knowledge on the development of autoreactive T cells and their regulation in the periphery. It describes "classical" veto, its mechanisms, and its novel applications. Finally, it argues that "classical" veto can be adapted to treat an autoimmune disease, such as type I diabetes mellitus.

Only multiple autoantibodies to islet cells (ICA), insulin, GAD65, IA-2 and IA-2beta predict immune-mediated (Type 1) diabetes in relatives

We report here our prospective study of 15,224 non-diabetic, first-degree relatives of probands with immune-mediated (type 1) diabetes (IMD), of which 135 were found to eventually develop diabetes. We determined islet cell, insulin, GAD65, insulinoma-associated antigen-2 and 2beta autoantibodies (ICA, IAA, GAD65A, IA-2A and IA-2betaA), on the first available serum samples. The latter three autoantibodies were however assayed on subsets of the relatives with and without ICA, IAA and/or GAD65A, plus most of the relatives who developed diabetes. Of the relatives who progressed to diabetes, 94% had at least one of these autoantibodies on the first screening, while ICA proved to be the most sensitive single marker (sensitivity 74%). Risk of diabetes was however negligible when ICA was found in the absence of the others (5-year risk=5.3%), but increased dramatically whenever two or more autoantibodies were present (5-year risk=28.2% and 66.2%, respectively). The most predictive combination of markers was ICA plus IA-2A and/or IA-2beta A. Loss of first phase insulin release to IVGTT also occurred only in those ICA-positive relatives who had one or more of the other autoantibodies. The data suggests that significant beta-cell damage is seen only when the underlying autoimmunity has spread to multiple antigenic islet cell determinants. Combinations of the autoantibodies occurred most often in relatives with the highest risk HLA-DR/DQ phenotypes. These data document that only relatives positive for at least two or more of these five autoantibodies are at significant risk of diabetes themselves. Intervention trials for the prevention of type 1 diabetes could be designed based on testing for these autoantibodies alone, without the need for HLA typing and IVGTT testing.

GAD65-Reactive T cells in a non-diabetic stiff-man syndrome patient

GAD65 (glutamic acid decarboxylase) is an important autoantigen in both type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and the neurological autoimmune disease stiff-man syndrome (SMS), and is expressed in pancreatic islets as well as the nervous system. Still, only 30% of SMS patients also have type 1 diabetes. To study regulation of T cell responsiveness to GAD65, we investigated a non-diabetic SMS patient with HLA-DR3/7 (predisposing to type 1 diabetes) and high levels of type 1 diabetes-associated autoantibodies against GAD65 and islet cells, and compared the results with those of her diabetic son and two other SMS patients. T cell responses to GAD65 were repeatedly absent in primary stimulation, whereas IA-2, islet antigen and tetanus toxoid induced significant T cell proliferation. However, after in vitro restimulation, GAD65 reactive T cell lines and clones were obtained that were HLA-DR3 restricted, and cross-reactive with a homogenate of purified human pancreatic islets. These T cells produced the immunoregulatory cytokine IL-10 in combination with IFN-gamma and IL-4 (Th0). The dominant T cell epitope was mapped to the central region of GAD65. Although no primary response to whole GAD65 was detectable, the naturally processed GAD65 peptide epitope was recognized vigorously in the primary stimulation assay. The lack of detectable primary T cell responses to GAD65, together with the GAD65-specific cytokine production of restimulated T cells, suggest that GAD65-specific cellular autoimmunity in this patient is suppressed and may be related to the absence of diabetes despite humoral autoreactivity and genetic predisposition.

T-cell response to proinsulin and insulin in type 1 and pretype 1 diabetes

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) results from the selective destruction of pancreatic beta cells by a T cell-mediated autoimmune process. Insulin and proinsulin are the only known beta cell-specific autoantigens. Using short-term cultures of freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, we evaluated T-cell responses to proinsulin and to insulin in IDDM patients and individuals at risk for IDDM. A proliferative T-cell response to proinsulin was observed in only 2 of 26 recent-onset IDDM subjects and 2 of 12 long-standing IDDM subjects and was associated with a proliferative response to insulin. In contrast, 5 of 13 islet cell autoantibody-positive first-degree relatives of IDDM patients showed a proliferative response to proinsulin alone, 3 of 13 to insulin alone, and 1 of 13 to both insulin and proinsulin. Overall, 9 of 13 ICA-positive first-degree relatives responded to either proinsulin or insulin. We observed an inverse relationship between antiinsulin antibodies and T-cell responses to insulin in ICA-positive first-degree relatives but not in long-standing IDDM patients. Our data indicate that proinsulin is a major antigen in IDDM and, further, illustrate the difference between the autoimmune response to insulin and the immune response to exogenous insulin.

Proteomics: quantitative and physical mapping of cellular proteins

Genome sequencing provides a wealth of information on predicted gene products (mostly proteins), but the majority of these have no known function. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry have, coupled with searches in protein and EST databases, transformed the protein-identification process. The proteome is the expressed protein complement of a genome and proteomics is functional genomics at the protein level. Proteomics can be divided into expression proteomics, the study of global changes in protein expression, and cell-map proteomics, the systematic study of protein-protein interactions through the isolation of protein complexes.

Autoreactivity versus autoaggression: a different perspective on human autoantigens

Antigen-specific B and T cell responses against myelin basic protein, as well as responses against beta-islet-cells or joint tissue, are commonly found both in patients with autoimmune disease and in normal control subjects with disease-associated HLA-DR/DQ alleles. Thus, autoreactive immune responses are not disease-specific; however, the presence of certain autoantibodies may have prognostic value and may aid in disease management.

Encephalitogenicity of myelin-associated oligodendrocytic basic protein and 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase for BALB/c and SJL mice

In search of new encephalitogenic myelin antigens, the 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (CNP) and 19 000 MW isoform of myelin-associated oligodendrocytic basic protein (MOBP) were obtained as recombinant proteins by the baculovirus expression system in Spodoptera frugiperda cells and purified to homogeneity by immobilized metal chelate affinity chromatography (IMAC). The purified MOBP was soluble in water and showed retarded migration on sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis similar to myelin basic protein (MBP). MOBP induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in nine of 15 susceptible SJL OlaHsd mice, causing death in two animals, whereas three of 14 BALB/c mice showed mild symptoms of EAE, manifested as transient weakness of hind limbs. In both mouse strains, periventricular infiltrates of mononuclear cells were observed. In addition, both 46 000 MW and 48 000 MW CNP isoforms were shown to be non-encephalitogenic for both mouse strains.

Autoimmune diabetes: the role of T cells, MHC molecules and autoantigens

Type 1 diabetes (IDDM) is a T cell mediated autoimmune disease which in part is determined genetically by its association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles. The major role of MHC molecules is the regulation of immune responses through the presentation of peptide epitopes of processed protein antigens to the immune system. Recently it has been demonstrated that MHC molecules associated with autoimmune diseases preferentially present peptides of other endogenous MHC proteins, that often mimic autoantigen-derived peptides. Hence, these MHC-derived peptides might represent potential targets for autoreactive T cells. It has consistently been shown that humoral autoimmunity to insulin predominantly occurs in early childhood. The cellular immune response to insulin is relatively low in the peripheral blood of patients with IDDM. Studies in NOD mice however have shown, that lymphocytes isolated from pancreatic islet infiltrates display a high reactivity to insulin and in particular to an insulin peptide B 9-23. Furthermore we have evidence that cellular autoimmunity to insulin is higher in young pre-diabetic individuals, whereas cellular reactivity to other autoantigens is equally distributed in younger and older subjects. This implicates that insulin, in human childhood IDDM and animal autoimmune diabetes, acts as an important early antigen which may target the autoimmune response to pancreatic beta cells. Moreover, we observed that in the vast majority of newly diagnosed diabetic patients or individuals at risk for IDDM, T cell reactivity to various autoantigens occurs simultaneously. In contrast, cellular reactivity to a single autoantigen is found with equal frequency in (pre)-type 1 diabetic individuals as well as in control subjects. Therefore the autoimmune response in the inductive phase of IDDM may be targeted to pancreatic islets by the cellular and humoral reactivity to one beta-cell specific autoantigen, but spreading to a set of different antigens may be a prerequisite for progression to destructive insulitis and clinical disease. Due to mimic epitopes shared by autoantigen(s), autologous MHC molecules and environmental antigens autoimmunity may spread, intramolecularly and intermolecularly and amplify upon repeated reexposure to mimic epitopes of environmental triggers.

The GM2-1 ganglioside islet autoantigen in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is expressed in secretory granules and is not beta-cell specific

The pancreatic islet monosialo-ganglioside (GM2-1), an autoantigen in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) recently shown to be the target of autoantibodies associated with diabetes development in relatives of IDDM patients, is islet specific within the pancreas, and its expression is metabolically regulatable. In the present study we sought to establish 1) whether GM2-1 is beta-cell specific, and 2) its intracellular localization. To this end, we analyzed the pattern of ganglioside expression in highly purified beta- and non-beta-cells isolated from rat islets. In addition, ganglioside levels were determined in subcellular fractions of a rat beta-cell line (INS). No qualitative or quantitative difference was found in the pattern of ganglioside expression between beta and non-beta rat islet cells, with GM3, GM2-1, and GD3 gangliosides expressed in both cell populations. Within INS cells, GM2-1 ganglioside was expressed in the fraction containing secretory granules and, to a lesser extent, in plasma membranes; GM3 was expressed in secretory granules, whereas GD3 was found only in plasma membranes. These data indicate that the GM2-1 autoantigen is not beta-cell specific within the islets, in accordance with the observation that this molecule is a target of islet cell autoantibodies that bind to the whole pancreatic islet. Interestingly, this autoantigen is present in secretory granules similarly to other autoantigens in IDDM (insulin, carboxypeptidase H, 38-kDa protein, etc.), suggesting that the autoimmunity to the components of this organelle may be central to the pathogenesis of the disease.

Protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein IA2-antibodies plus glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 antibodies (GADA) indicates autoimmunity as frequently as islet cell antibodies assay in children with recently diagnosed diabetes mellitus

Islet cell antibodies (ICA), the classical autoimmunity marker for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), are detected in ∼85% of children with recently diagnosed diabetes. Because the ICA assay is semiquantitative and difficult to standardize, alternative assays are needed. When glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD 65) was discovered as a major islet antigen, the measurement of antibodies to GAD 65 (GADA) was considered a good alternative to ICA. Recently, however, we showed that 1 in 3 ICA-positive diabetic patients do not have GADA. Now, antibodies against the protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein IA2 (IA2-ab) have been detected in IDDM. To find out whether measurements of IA2-ab combined with those of GADA could detect autoimmunity to the same extent as ICA, we have measured all three kinds of antibodies (using radioligand binding assays for IA2-ab and GADA) in 100 recently diagnosed diabetic and 100 control children: ICA were found in 87, IA2-ab in 69, and GADA in 66 of the 100 diabetic patients, whereas in the 100 control children ICA were found in 2, IA2-ab in 1, and GADA in 3. Among the 87 ICA-positive patients, 45 (52%) had both IA2-ab and GADA, 21 (24%) had only IA2-ab, and 16 (18%) had only GADA, whereas 5 (6%) lacked both IA2-ab and GADA. Among the 13 ICA-negative patients, 1 (8%) had both IA2-ab and GADA, 2 (15%) had only IA2-ab, and 4 (31%) had only GADA. Thus, 6 of the 100 patients had neither ICA, IA2-ab, nor GADA. Combining the IA2-ab and GADA assays gave positive results for autoimmunity in 89 of the 100 patients, compared with 87 by the ICA assay. The combination of the IA2-ab and GADA assays appears to be an effective alternative to the ICA assay.

Antibody screening in a population of children

The first large-scale (secondary) intervention trials have been initiated in first-degree family members of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Within a few years, data from these studies may suggest that intervention is possible, thereby opening similar approaches in the general population. However, before large-scale intervention studies can be initiated, several problems need to be solved. One of these problems is the lack of knowledge on the natural course of beta-cell autoimmunity. This review analyses this and other issues related to population-based prediction for IDDM. At present, no long-term follow-up studies are available in large-sized populations, but data show that prediction in the general population is both technically feasible and likely to have sufficient power to be useful in prevention trials. More data need to be generated, not only to determine which markers are most likely to give good prediction but also to obtain knowledge on the natural course, psychosocial impact and cost-effectiveness of screening.

Islet cell antigens in the prediction and prevention of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is associated with both antibody and T-cell autoimmunity to pancreatic islet cell components. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the identification of the molecular components of the pancreatic islets to which these immune responses are directed. These advances have led to the development of a number of immune markers for use in screening for individuals at risk for disease, and there is promise of antigen-specific immune intervention therapies to prevent diabetes in those identified as at risk. In this article, we review our current knowledge of autoantigens associated with IDDM and the implications this has on the prediction and prevention of the disease.

An islet-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase is a likely precursor to the 37-kDa autoantigen in type 1 diabetes: human and macaque sequences, tissue distribution, unique and shared epitopes, and predictive autoantibodies

BACKGROUND

We sought to identify novel islet-cell autoantigens to better understand the pathogenesis, prediction, and immunotherapy of type 1 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Macaque and human islet cDNA libraries expressed in mammalian cells were screened with human diabetes sera. A positive clone was sequenced directly and after 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Northern blotting and in situ hybridization revealed the tissue distribution of the corresponding protein. Antigen, expressed by in vitro translation, and tryptic peptides were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. For the immunoprecipitations, 183 diabetic, 60 prediabetic, and 91 control sera were used. Truncated antigens were used in immunoprecipitations for epitope mapping. Recombinant antigen expressed in transfected fibroblasts was used in competition assays.

RESULTS

Sequencing yielded an 111-kDa, 1,013 amino acid, transmembrane protein (M1851) containing consensus protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) sequence. M1851 was 77% identical in the intracellular domain, but only 31% identical extracellularly, to the islet-cell autoantigen ICA512. mRNA localized to brain, prostate, pancreatic islets, and adrenal medulla. After limited trypsinization, the in vitro translated antigen was 37 kDa. M1851 was recognized by 47% of prediabetes sera, 31% of new diabetes sera, but only 1% of healthy controls. Only 1/73 sera binding M1851 failed to bind ICA512, whereas 42/114 binding ICA512 did not bind M1851. M1851 reactivity was not fully displaced by ICA512 in 24/49 sera. Removing the C-terminal 27, 80, or 160 amino acids of M1851 decreased reactivity by 70%, 90%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This new islet-cell PTPase is likely to be the precursor to the 37-kDa tryptic fragment antigen. It is structurally related to ICA512 but has distinct diabetes autoantibody epitopes located at the C terminus.