European versus U.S. data on the course of schizophrenia

The Concept of Schizophrenia: From Unity to Diversity

After over 100 years of research without clarifying the aetiology of schizophrenia, a look at the current state of knowledge in epidemiology, genetics, precursors, psychopathology, and outcome seems worthwhile. The disease concept, created by Kraepelin and modified by Bleuler, has a varied history. Today, schizophrenia is considered a polygenic disorder with onset in early adulthood, characterized by irregular psychotic episodes and functional impairment, but incident cases occur at all ages with marked differences in symptoms and social outcome. Men’s and women’s lifetime risk is nearly the same. At young age, women fall ill a few years later and less severely than men, men more rarely and less severely later in life. The underlying protective effect of oestrogen is antagonized by genetic load. The illness course is heterogeneous and depressive mood the most frequent symptom. Depression and schizophrenia are functionally associated, and affective and nonaffective psychoses do not split neatly. Most social consequences occur at the prodromal stage. Neither schizophrenia as such nor its main symptom dimensions regularly show pronounced deterioration over time. Schizophrenia is neither a residual state of a neurodevelopmental disorder nor a progressing neurodegenerative process. It reflects multifactorial CNS instability, which leads to cognitive deficits and symptom exacerbations.

Clinical characteristics of patients who have recovered from schizophrenia: the role of empathy and positive-self schema

AIM

This article compares the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with schizophrenia who recovered with those who achieved remission.

METHODS

Participants were classified based on predetermined criteria for recovery and remission. Data on demographic characteristics, information on duration of untreated psychosis, and assessments of current and historical symptom profiles and socio-occupational functioning emerged from careful chart review and direct interviews. Cross-sectional assessments of clinical variables were derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Personal and Social Performance Scale, the Social Functioning Questionnaire, the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (ScoRS), the Basic Empathy Scale, and the Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS).

RESULTS

We found no significant differences between recovered and remitted groups with respect to demographic variables or duration of untreated psychosis. Cognitive and total empathy scores, positive-self schema score on the BCSS, and global score on the ScoRS were significantly higher in the recovered than the remitted group. Furthermore, patients with good levels of empathy and positive-self schema and intact neurocognitive functioning were more likely to achieve recovery.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that empathy, positive-self schema and neurocognitive functioning may serve as important clinical characteristics distinguishing those patients who have recovered from those who have achieved only remission.

Improving reliability of the assessment of the life course of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Life course studies of schizophrenia that have used a 3-phase model (onset, course, and outcome) have had their use restricted owing to differences in definition and methodology. The purpose of this investigation was to describe life course data in mathematical terms and to compare the results with the findings from other life course studies.

METHOD

The study population was comprised of 128 of 137 people who were first admitted for schizophrenia to 1 of the 2 mental hospitals in Alberta in 1963 and followed until 1997 or death. Patient evaluations were based on retrospective and contemporaneous information collected from the patients and hospital files, treatment records, and family members. Mathematically derived ratings were formulated for course, outcome, and onset (pre-admission years). The distribution of the resulting 8 life course types was compared with profiles drawn from other such studies reported in the literature.

RESULTS

The use of mathematical descriptions of onset, course, and outcome produced profiles that did not closely match the results of other investigations, largely owing to inconsistency across studies. Further, the present approach to outcome measurement produced results that were less favourable than those found in other studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on the life course of schizophrenia could be made more comparable by specifying mathematically expressed operational definitions of onset, course, and outcome. Nonetheless, the use of the term outcome can be questioned as it implies an assessment at a specific time rather than providing a summary statement of the quality of a life.

Developing a model of recovery in mental health

Background

The recovery process is characterized by the interaction of a set of individual, environmental and organizational conditions common to different people suffering with a mental health problem. The fact that most of the studies have been working with schizophrenic patients we cannot extend what has been learned about the process of recovery to other types of mental problem. In the meantime, the prevalence of anxiety, affective and borderline personality disorders continues to increase, imposing a significant socioeconomic burden on the Canadian healthcare system and on the patients, their family and significant other [1]. The aim of this study is to put forward a theoretical model of the recovery process for people with mental health problem schizophrenic, affective, anxiety and borderline personality disorders, family members and a significant care provider.

Method and design

To operationalize the study, a qualitative, inductive design was chosen. Qualitative research open the way to learning – the inside – about different perspectives and issues people face in their process of recovery. The study proposal is involving a multisite study that will be conducted in three different cities of the Province of Québec in Canada: Montréal, Québec and Trois-Rivières. The plan is to select 108 participants, divided into four comparison groups representing four types of mental health problem. Each comparison group (n = 27) will be made up of 9 units. Each unit will comprise one person with a mental health problem (schizophrenia, affective anxiety, and borderline personality disorders. Data will be collected through semi-structured open-ended interview. The in-depth qualitative analysis inspired from the grounded theory approach will permit the illustration of the recovery process.

Discussion

The transformation of our Health Care System and the importance being put on the people well-being and autonomy development of the person who are suffering with mental problem This study protocol follows-up on earlier theory-building process that begun with the work of Noiseux [2]. The contribution of the present study is to increase the comprehension of the concept of recovery and to enhance the body of knowledge in that domain. Very few studies have examined recovery and the one that did used a descriptive approach which did not take into account the perspective of the family members and the caregivers of the recovery process.

Recovery as perceived by people with schizophrenia, family members and health professionals: A grounded theory

BACKGROUND

Advances in knowledge in the biomedical and psychosocial sciences have expanded our understanding of schizophrenia and of how it evolves in people living with it. These individuals are no longer viewed as being 'ill' and requiring long-term hospitalisation. We have come instead to have a much more positive view of them and of the role they can play in coming to terms both with their health condition and with society. In the majority of cases, schizophrenia sufferers have the potential to recover.

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to propose a theoretical explanation of recovery based on the concept of human responses put forward by the American Nurses' Association.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected from 41 participants (16 people living with schizophrenia, 5 family members, 20 health professionals). Selection criteria required the people living with schizophrenia to be in stable health, see themselves as being in the process of recovery, and be able to speak about it. Family members were expected to have displayed a strong bond with their relative living with schizophrenia, and the health professionals to have had at least 3 years experience dealing with schizophrenia patients.

METHOD

The Grounded Theory approach was selected because it allows for diversified data sources to be used in the empirical study of a phenomenon. It is an appropriate approach for the conceptualization of complex phenomena and the development of middle-range theory. To ensure a variety of subjects were involved, semi-structured interviews were conducted in three different settings: a specialised psychiatric hospital, a self-help group, and a community setting.

FINDINGS

Seven categories emerged from the analysis and conceptualization: perceiving schizophrenia as a 'descent into hell'; igniting a spark of hope; developing insight; activating the instinct to fight back; discovering keys to well-being; maintaining a constant equilibrium between internal and external forces; and, finally, seeing light at the end of the tunnel. Comparison of these categories led to their being consolidated into a core category in which recovery is defined as a 'process involving intrinsic, non-linear progress that is primarily generated by the role as actor that the individual adopts to rebuild his or her sense of self and to manage the imbalance between internal and external forces with the objective of charting a path through the social world and regaining a sense of well-being on all biopsychosocial levels.'

CONCLUSION

This study of recovery from schizophrenia is conceptualised from the nursing perspective: the concept of 'Human Responses' [American Nurses Association (ANA), 1980. Nursing: A Social Policy Statement. ANA, Kansas City, MO; American Association of Neuroscience Nurses (AANN's), 2001. AANN's Neuroscience Nursing: Human Responses to Neurologic Dysfunction, second ed. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia]. It was possible to go beyond a descriptive analysis and bring out the dynamics of the process through a detailed, in-depth presentation of the recovery process. The theoretical explanation we have postulated is based on the inner resources of individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and their potential to make a recovery.

Definitions of the term 'recovered' in schizophrenia and other disorders

BACKGROUND

The use of the term 'recovered' in outcome studies of schizophrenia has for a long time been problematic because of the many different definitions in use. In the present study different definitions of recovered in schizophrenia are reviewed and compared with similar definitions in other fields of medicine.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

A literature search was done for criteria-based definitions of recovered as used in follow-up studies of patients with schizophrenia during the last 50 years and the current use of the term in other fields of medicine.

RESULTS

In medicine, only the field of psychiatry defines the term recovered to be synonymous with no or minimal signs of illness. Other fields only apply the term when studying the outcome of a specific function. In psychiatry, only the field of schizophrenia includes both symptoms and functioning in the definition. All but 1 of the 18 definitions found in use in the field of schizophrenia required minimal or no symptoms, while all differed in defining functional recovery. Recovered was seldom defined as following from a state of remission, and studies varied in requiring a stable phase.

CONCLUSION

When using the term in the field of schizophrenia, a distinction should be made between symptomatic and functional recovery in order to place it in line with other fields of medicine. To avoid confusing the process of recovery from the state of being recovered, the term recovered should be reserved for use in outcome studies, following from a time in remission. We suggest 2 years.

Stability and prediction of schizophrenia from adolescence to adulthood

Stability of schizophrenia diagnosis from adolescence to adulthood, antecedents of schizophrenia, and differences in developmental and behavioural histories between subjects with early onset schizophrenia (EOS) and with adult onset schizophrenia (AOS) were investigated in 145 adult subjects diagnosed with mental disorders in adolescence and re-diagnosed on the basis of medical records according to DSM-IV.A very high diagnostic stability schizophrenia was demonstrated at the 28-year follow-up. Several factors, including neurological adversities, delayed language development, low IQ, and congenital functional disability, differentiated significantly between schizophrenic subjects and non-schizophrenic subjects. Histories of concussion, physical abuse, parental divorce, and unstable familial context differentiated significantly between EOS and AOS subjects. Our findings support earlier evidence of schizophrenia being a chronic disorder with high diagnostic stability, and confirm the importance of neurological adversities, delayed language development, and low IQ as factors predictive of schizophrenia. Exploration of four case histories of AOS subjects delineates "pre-schizophrenic warning cluster" where combination of neurological adversities, temperamental problems, antisocial behaviour, preference for solitary play, and unstable family system constitute main factors.

A prospective longitudinal 10-year study of schizophrenia's three major factors and depression

This study investigated the nature, independence, and stability of schizophrenia's syndrome factors and depression at 2, 4.5, 7.5 and 10 years post-index hospitalization. At the four follow-ups, 71 patients (48 with schizophrenia and 23 with schizoaffective disorder) were assessed for symptoms hypothesized to constitute the reality distortion, disorganized, and negative factors of schizophrenia. At the last three follow-ups, the patients were also assessed for symptoms of depression. Factor analyses of schizophrenia symptoms revealed more than three syndrome factors at each follow-up. Longitudinally, reality distortion was a stable and relatively independent factor. The negative syndrome was independent but was bifurcated into two dimensions, interpreted as social/emotional withdrawal and diminished movement/expressiveness. Although signs of disorganization were not unified or independent early in schizophrenia's course, speech/thought disorder, disorganized affect, and poverty of speech content coalesced to form a disorganization factor by the 7.5-year follow-up. When depressive symptoms were added to the analyses, depression constituted an independent and stable dimension of schizophrenia over time. Each schizophrenia factor demonstrated a unique longitudinal course. Courses included stable symptom consistency (reality distortion), evolving symptom convergence (disorganization), and recurrent bifurcation and symptom instability (the negative syndrome).

A 16-year follow-up study of schizophrenia and related disorders in Sofia, Bulgaria

A total of 60 patients with functional non-affective psychoses were assessed 16 years after their inclusion in the WHO co-ordinated study on reduction and assessment of psychiatric disability. All patients at inclusion had a recent onset of a psychotic disorder. About one-third of the patients had a good outcome. The rest showed moderate to severe psychiatric symptoms and social disability. Comparison with other similar studies suggested that our results show a low mortality rate, high levels of clinical symptoms, high levels of social disability and a low percentage of institutionalized patients. These findings are discussed in the context of the high level of family involvement in patients' care, which could reflect a cultural factor.

Ten-year course of schizophrenia--the Madras longitudinal study

Ninety first-episode patients fulfilling ICD-9 criteria for schizophrenia were followed up prospectively for 10 years. Complete assessments were possible on 76. The pattern of illness was good in 67% of the cases, and the commonest patterns was one with recurrent episodes. Predictors of poor course and longer time spent in psychosis were identified. All positive and negative symptoms showed a steep decline at the end of 10 years. The results are discussed in the context of longitudinal research on the course of schizophrenia in developing countries.

Outcome in untreated schizophrenia: a search for symptoms and traits with prognostic meaning in patients admitted to a mental hospital in the preneuroleptic era

A cohort of schizophrenic patients consecutively admitted to a mental hospital for the first time in 1925 was investigated in search of symptoms and traits with prognostic meaning. Since Leonhard's diagnostic system was applied, cases with mixed symptoms and a favourable outcome were excluded as being neither schizophrenic nor manic-depressive. Owing to the admission policy then prevailing, cases with clinically less striking and socially less deleterious features were underrepresented. The sample (n = 70), so demarcated, was still considered fairly appropriate for the purpose of a differential study of outcome in nuclear schizophrenia with a life-long follow-up. The best outcome group consisted of 33% of the sample; 24% formed an intermediate group, and 43% profoundly deteriorated with continuous psychotic symptoms and a total loss of social function. Marriage before index admission was the only characteristic related to a favourable outcome. Nuclear schizophrenic symptoms, thought disturbance, blunted affect and all catatonic symptoms listed in DSM-III were related to an unfavourable outcome. When prognostic subgroups were compared pairwise, no favourable trait was detectable, and there were no decisive differences between the group with the best outcome and the intermediate group. When these 2 groups were compared with the group with worst outcome, however, significant differences arose with respect to unfavourable characteristics. Predictions using a discriminant analytic procedure yielded the same results. The hypothesis that affective and atypical signs would also have prognostic meaning in nuclear schizophrenia was disproved.