Changing trends in angioedema

Recurrent angioedema: Experience at a tertiary care urban medical center

OBJECTIVE

To determine the demographics, presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with recurrent angioedema. To compare the findings to patients with ACE inhibitor related angioedema.

METHODS

Retrospective case series with chart review of patients who presented to a tertiary-care hospital between January 2010 and December 2017 with two or more episodes of angioedema. Excluded were patients with anaphylactic reaction, medication induced angioedema, or angioedema secondary to an infectious etiology. A group of 88 patients who presented during the same time period with ACE inhibitor related angioedema was used as a control. Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-tailed Fisher exact test and a multivariate logistical regression model to determine significant associations.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were identified; 61 met the selection criteria and had 217 total episodes of angioedema episodes presenting to the emergency department. Fifty percent were Caucasian or Hispanic. The average number of episodes was 3.5 (range: 2-23). The lips and tongue were the most commonly affected sites (37% and 39%). The larynx and floor of mouth were least likely to be involved (7% and 6%). Only 1 patient was found to have C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency. Twenty-eight percent of patients had asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergies, or atopic dermatitis. Only 11% of episodes required airway intervention. No patients required airway intervention after admission.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent angioedema was primarily idiopathic, was less severe than ACE inhibitor angioedema, and was associated with an atopic history. There was less frequent worsening of symptoms after admission, and recurrences occurred more frequently are at the same anatomic subsite.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

H1R mediates local anesthetic-induced vascular permeability in angioedema

Angioedema may occur during local anesthetic (LA) injection in the perioperative period. Histaminergic angioedema is the most common form of angioedema. It has been reported that LA is a potential exogenous ligand for histamine receptor 1 (H₁R). Whether H₁R participates in LA-induced angioedema is still controversial. By using a constructed H₁R high-expressed cell model, siRNA transfection, pharmacologic means, and genetically modified animal models, here we showed that H₁R mediated LA-induced hyperpermeability. LA with uncycled N-methyl scaffold in the side chain (procaine, tetracaine and lidocaine) had a better strength of drug-H₁R affinity than that for LA with cycled N atom (bupivacaine and ropivacaine) by the molecular docking assay and equilibrium dissociation constant (K_D values) obtained from the cell membrane chromatography (CMC) relative standard method. Procaine, tetracaine, and lidocaine triggered big calcium mobilization in H₁R-HEK293 cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) but much weaker in NC-HEK293 cells or H₁R knockdown HUVECs. Besides, the results of transendothelial resistance measurement, paracellular flux assay and immunofluorescence showed that procaine induced H₁R-dependent hyperpermeability, which involved in PLCγ/IP3R/PKC, ERK1/2, Akt signaling pathways, downstream vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cad) destabilization. Furthermore, H₁R gene knockout prevented paw swelling and vascular leakage caused by procaine, tetracaine, and lidocaine in vivo. This study supported a key role of H₁R in LA-induced angioedema, and suggested that in the design of LA structure, the ring formation of the N-methyl scaffold on the side chain can properly avoid the angioedema.

Angioedema - Our Experience Focused On Socio-Demographic, Etiological and Clinical Characteristics of the Condition and Its Management

BACKGROUND:

Angioedema (AE) is acute oedema of the skin and mucous surfaces, involving the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. AE could be a life-threatening medical condition. Regardless of its growing clinical importance, many aspects of its aetiology and pathogenesis remain poorly understood. Its incidence, demographic characteristics, diagnosis and therapy, need further investigation.

AIM:

This study reports our experience with angioedema concerning its social and demographic characteristics, aetiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Study design: Eighty-eight patients with AE were enrolled. The study is a retrospective analysis of patients treated in our Clinics.

METHODS:

All participants were asked on a voluntary basis to fill out a specially designed questionnaire on the day of their discharge. Other important data sources included: patients’ history and notes during the hospital stay, information from previous admissions, etc. Parametric and non-parametric statistical methods were used for data processing. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., IBM SPSS Statistica) version 20.0

RESULTS:

Based on our results, AE affects more frequently patients over 50 years of age, regardless of their sex. Urban residents prevail, among them - more commonly working women. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), hormones and antibiotics were among the most common triggers – in 8%, 4.5% and 11.4% of the cases respectively. In 9.09% of the patients, food-induced AE was seen, the most common foods reported, were – nuts, eggs and egg products. The common sites of involvement were periorbital area and lips. In only 9.1% of the patients, oedema progressed to spread to the upper respiratory tract. Cardiac conditions were the most frequent underlying disorders – 33%, of the patients, auto-immune thyroiditis was the second most common-14.8%, followed by musculo- skeletal disorders (10.2%) and diabetes (4.5%) Family history of allergy was seen in 8.4% of the patients, the most frequent allergic disorder, reported, was asthma. In patients with HAE, family history was present in 2.9% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

All patients received therapy with steroids and antihistamines, resulting in resolution of symptoms and no invasive procedures were necessary. Based on our results, the diagnosis of AE is often difficult and delayed and requires specialist evaluation. If recognised on time and adequately treated, the outcomes are favourable.

Cofactors and comorbidities in patients with aspirin/NSAID hypersensitivity

Hypersensitivity reactions to aspirin and other NSAIDs occur in individuals genetically predisposed and exhibit different clinical manifestations, especially respiratory, cutaneous, and generalised. Five different phenotypes define distinct clinical pictures: aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, aspirin/NSAID cutaneous disease, NSAID-induced urticaria, angio-oedema and anaphylaxis, single NSAID reactions, and delayed reactions. They are observed more frequently in middle-aged women, and in atopic individuals. While ASA/NSAID hypersensitivity shares comorbidities with asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, chronic urticaria and angio-oedema, ASA and other NSAIDs can also be cofactors for other clinically relevant conditions, especially food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis, angio-oedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and oral mite anaphylaxis. Awareness on these relationships is required for the correct diagnosis, classification, and treatment of affected patients.

Prescriptions for self-injectable epinephrine in emergency department angioedema management

BACKGROUND

Angioedema is often treated in the emergency department (ED). Few studies have evaluated self-injectable epinephrine (SIE) prescribing patterns for angioedema.

OBJECTIVES

To describe presentation and management of ED patients with angioedema and determine factors associated with epinephrine administration, hospital admission and SIE prescription.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED patients with angioedema between January 2005 and December 2006.

RESULTS

Of 63 patients, 39 (61.9%) were female. Median age was 49 years. Precipitating factors were identified in 36 (57.1%) patients. History of other allergic conditions was seen in 37 (58.7%) patients. Seventeen (27.0%) patients received epinephrine, 55 (87.3%) received antihistamines, and 51 (81.0%) received steroids. Epinephrine was administered more commonly in patients with edema of the tongue (risk ratio [RR], 5.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-14.33, P = .0003), tightness/fullness of throat (RR, 3.31, 95% CI 1.62-6.76, P = .006), and dyspnea/wheeze (RR, 3.04, 95% CI 1.41-6.59, P = .005). Hospitalization was more common in patients with dyspnea/wheeze (P = .028) and allergic history (P = .006). Thirteen patients (22.0%) were discharged with SIE. An SIE prescription was associated with younger patients (median age, 26 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15-50] vs a median age 57.5 years [IQR 43-68], P = .004) and patients with throat tightness/fullness (RR, 4.2, 95% CI 1.8-9.8, P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Patients with respiratory symptoms and allergic history were likely to be admitted. Epinephrine use was more frequent in patients with signs and symptoms of oropharyngeal edema. Younger patients and those with tightness/fullness of throat were likely to be prescribed SIE. Further studies are needed to determine who would benefit from epinephrine use and SIE prescription.

Angioedema: a review of 367 episodes presenting to three tertiary care hospitals

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients treated for angioedema, and determined the factors associated with the clinical course.

METHODS

We performed a chart review of 367 episodes presenting from 1997 through 2008.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) age was 51.8 +/- 20.1 years; 65.7% of the episodes occurred in female patients; 62.4% of the episodes were in African American patients. The patients were on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for 49.1% of the episodes, and an inciting factor (diet change, minor trauma, or exposure to fumes) was present for 21.5%. We found that 75.7% of the episodes were type 1 angioedema, 5.7% were type 2, 1.4% were type 3, and 17.2% involved multiple sites; 58% of the episodes required admission. For 3.3% of the episodes, the patients were intubated, and in 0.3% of the episodes, the patients required a tracheostomy. Logistic regression identified non-African American race, allergies, alcohol use, use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs, multiple sites, and age as associated with the need for admission. Bivariate analysis identified age, multiple affected sites, stridor, hoarseness, dysphagia, and drooling as associated with intubation or tracheostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel findings of this study are lower rates of airway intervention than reported previously and the fact that multiple affected sites were associated with admission and intubation or tracheostomy, particularly when the edema involved the larynx or hypopharynx.

Angioedema: clinical and etiological aspects

Angioedema is an abrupt swelling of the skin, mucous membrane, or both including respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. This study aimed to report an experience of angioedema in a university hospital with respect to etiologies, clinical features, treatment, and outcome. One hundred and five patients were enrolled. About half had angioedema without urticaria. The common sites of involvement were periorbital area and lips. Forty five patients (49%) had systemic symptoms. The most common cause of angioedema was allergic angioedema. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced angioedema and idiopathic angioedema were detected in 20% and 18%, respectively. Among patients with allergic angioedema, 41.7% were caused by food, 39.6% by drugs. Thirty seven patients (39%) had recurrent attacks of angioedema. Mean standard deviation (SD) number of attacks in patients with recurrent angioedema was 3.9 (2.7) (ranging from 2 to 10 times). Patients who had older age and multiple sites of skin involvement had tendency to have systemic symptoms.

Angio-œdèmes iatrogènes: rôle des inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion et des antagonistes des récepteurs à l'angiotensine II (sartans)

Nephrologists should be aware the fact that the angioedema is a common side effect not only under angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors treatment but also under sartans therapy. The frequency of angioedema under ACE inhibitors is estimated at 1 to 7 per thousand. The physiopathology of ACE angioedema implicates the lack of degradation of kinines due to the inhibition of multiple enzymes activity including ACE. Angioedema under sartans seems less frequent than this observed under ACE inhibitors. Its mechanism remains poorly defined, but implicates the increase of kinine production via the stimulation of angiotensin receptor type II, and/or the lack of degradation of kinines via multiple enzymes other than ACE. The frequency of the apparition of angioedema under sartans in patients who had have angioedema under ACE inhibitors is inconsistent and varied from 7.7% to 50%. Reports indicated that angioedema under ACE or sartans could have a spontaneous regression. However, the relapse of angioedema under these drugs should lead to the diagnosis of iatrogenic etiology, and to the drugs withdrawal. ACE inhibitors/Sartans-associated angioedema episodes need to be reported to the French Adverse Event Reporting System database to evaluate their frequency and to avoid severe consequences.

Angioedema of the airway: an unusual case

We report a case of angioedema caused by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and topical lignocaine spray, administered during nasendoscopy.

Angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is a rare but well known entity. Allergy to topical lignocaine has been acknowledged as a rare phenomenon when used for dental surgery and for skin anaesthesia, but it has not previously been reported after topical administration prior to nasendoscopy. In the reported case, our patient was unfortunate enough to be allergic to both lisinopril and lignocaine. The result was life-threatening airway obstruction, and the continued use of lignocaine spray sustained the laryngeal oedema. We advise that patients are asked about any and every allergy – specifically, any previous problems with dental procedures – before administration of local anaesthetic spray to the upper aerodigestive tract.

Investigation of angioedema associated with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to cause angioedema.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the time to onset of angioedema and the subsequent episodes of angioedema in patients initially experiencing ACE-I- or ARB-induced angioedema.

METHODS

A manual medical record review was conducted on 64 patients with a diagnosis of urticaria, angioedema, or anaphylaxis as a result of taking an ACE-I or ARB. Data recorded included demographic characteristics; time to onset of symptoms; concomitant medication use; laboratory test results; recurrent episodes of angioedema, urticaria, or anaphylaxis; and morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients with angioedema was 60.2 years (age range, 32-92 years). Women (60%) and African Americans (69%) were affected more commonly. The primary location for angioedema was the lips and tongue. Sixty-one of 64 patients developed at least one episode of angioedema as the result of taking an ACE-I, and 3 patients had angioedema associated with an ARB. The mean time to onset of angioedema after initiation of therapy in 51 patients was 1.8 years, with 13 patients (25%) presenting within the first month and 6 patients (12%) developing angioedema in the first week. No patients required a tracheostomy or died. Also, none of the 6 patients, whose angioedema was attributed to an ACE-I who then received an ARB, developed recurrent angioedema in more than 8.1 patient-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioedema attributable to an ACE-I or ARB resolves on discontinued use of the medication. It most commonly affects women and African Americans and did so in the first month of treatment in 25% of patients. Physicians should be aware but not deterred necessarily from recommending an ARB in patients with ACE-I-induced angioedema because of the benefits of control of hypertension or reducing albuminuria in selected patients.

Brief review: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angioedema: anesthetic implications

PURPOSE

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are a group of drugs used to treat hypertension and heart failure, with additional benefits, such as cardiovascular and renal protection, in patients with diabetes. However, angioedema as a complication of ACEI therapy is under-recognized. As there are important implications for anesthesiologists and emergency medicine physicians, a review was undertaken to document the scope of the problem of ACEI-induced angioedema..

METHODS

A review of the published literature (identified by searching Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL) was undertaken, addressing the clinical uses of ACEIs and the incidence, risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of angioedema associated with the use of these drugs.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The incidence of ACEI related angioedema has increased from 0.1-0.2% to 1% over the last decade. Patients who are receiving ACEIs are predisposed to developing angioedema which may be triggered by trauma, airway instrumentation, infection, and irritant fumes, particularly in those who are at increased risk. Cases of acute facial and airway oedema, due to ACEI drug administration, may be misdiagnosed as an anaphylactic reaction, and the association with ACEIs may be ignored. Some cases of intraoperative and postoperative airway edema may be precipitated by airway instrumentation in patients receiving ACEI drugs. The severity of airway compromise ranges from mild facial edema to severe laryngeal or subglottic edema which may prove life-threatening.

CONCLUSION

In view of the widespread clinical indications and ever-increasing use of ACEI drugs, the potentially life-threatening adverse reaction of ACEI-associated angioedema, and its treatment, must be recognized by anesthesiologists and all clinicians involved in airway management.

Perioral Angioedema Associated With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Angioedema is a non-pruritic swelling usually limited to the skin and mucous membranes of the face and perioral soft tissues. It can be life threatening but usually is not, and can be managed with conservative medical treatment unless the airway is endangered. Recent reports suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors can predispose and/or precipitate angioedema, with a predilection toward patients of African American ancestry.

METHODS

This case report involved a 65-year-old African American female who was being treated surgically for localized chronic periodontitis. The procedure was performed without incident, and the patient was alert and stable when released. The next day, the patient called and reported that her lips were swollen. She stated that this had happened a number of times over the past several years, sometimes related to eating shellfish and other times without any known precipitating factor. All previous episodes of perioral swelling occurred after ACE inhibitor therapy had been initiated.

RESULTS

The patient was in no distress, with no other site involvement. She was prescribed oral hydroxyzine and her appearance returned to normal after 5 days. Although the patient had experienced previous episodes of angioedema, none had been in response to any dental procedure. She was referred to the Allergy and Immunology Clinic for skin testing, the results of which were negative to shellfish with good controls. Other potentiating etiologies were also ruled out by the allergist.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioedema is a recognized possible side effect of ACE inhibitor therapy. The exact mechanism by which ACE inhibitors induce angioedema is not known, although the risk of occurrence is much greater in African Americans. Practitioners should be alert to this potentially fatal condition in patients who take ACE inhibitors or the newer angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).

Sirolimus-induced angioedema

Sirolimus (SRL) is a macrolide immunosuppressant that has gained widespread use in organ transplantation. Its full spectrum of side-effects is yet to be defined. We describe herein three cases of SRL-induced angioedema (AE) in African-American (AA) primary renal allograft recipients who received SRL in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. In two cases, AE manifested after SRL was restarted after a period of discontinuation. The third case presented upon initial exposure to the drug. None of the patients was receiving any drug that has been previously associated with AE. Complete resolution occurred only after SRL was withdrawn. AE has not recurred in any of the patients during a follow-up period of up to 21 months. We conclude that AE is a previously unrecognized adverse event associated with SRL use. Close monitoring for this side-effect, especially in AA patients, is warranted.

Angioneurotic edema of the upper airways and antihypertensive therapy

Angioneurotic edema is a non-pitting edema which is usually limited to the skin and the mucous membranes of the face and upper aerodigestive tract. The risk of acute upper airway obstruction makes angioneurotic edema a concern for emergency room physicians, internists and otolaryngologists because prompt recognition of the condition and immediate institution of therapy is essential for proper airway management. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have recently been associated with angioneurotic edema, the probable link being the reduction in angiotensin II and the potentiation of bradykinin, resulting in vasodilatation, increased vascular permeability and angioedema. We report four cases of acquired angioneurotic edema, which were probably related to ACE inhibitor use. These cases are discussed, including a review of the literature, methods of diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment of angioedema. Care should be taken when antihypertensive ACE inhibitor treatments are started and patients should be warned of the potential risk of angioneurotic edema.