Therapeutic drug monitoring of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the management of chronic inflammatory diseases

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).

OBJECTIVE

To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

METHODS

Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.

CONCLUSION

This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Adalimumab Based on Prior Information Using Real World Data

Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Due to its considerably variable pharmacokinetics and the risk of developing antibodies against adalimumab, it is highly recommended to use a model-informed precision dosing approach. The aim of this study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of adalimumab for patients with IBD based on a literature model (reference model) to be used in the clinical setting. A retrospective observational study with 54 IBD patients was used to develop two different PopPK models based on the reference model. One of the developed models estimated the pharmacokinetic population parameters (estimated model), and the other model incorporated informative priors (prior model). The models were evaluated with bias and imprecision. Clinical impact was also assessed, evaluating the differences in dose interventions. The developed models included the albumin as a continuous covariate on apparent clearance. The prior model was superior to the estimated model in terms of bias, imprecision and clinical impact on the target population. In conclusion, the prior model adequately characterized adalimumab PK in the studied population and was better than the reference model in terms of predictive performance and clinical impact.

Comparison of the Early Warning Effects of Novel Inflammatory Markers SIRI, NLR, and LMR in the Inhibition of Carotid Atherosclerosis by Testosterone in Middle-Aged and Elderly Han Chinese Men in the Real World: A Small Sample Clinical Observational Study

The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the relationship among serum testosterone, systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged and elderly men of Han nationality in the real world. With reference to the inclusion criteria, 89 middle-aged and elderly Han male patients were finally selected. Local weighted regression (LOESS) and multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the independent correlation between serum testosterone, new inflammatory markers, and atherosclerosis. The diagnostic value of related indexes was evaluated by the receiver working curve characteristic curve (ROC), and the best critical value of testosterone and related inflammatory indexes was discussed. In the LOESS model, bioavailable testosterone (BT), free testosterone (FT), total testosterone (TT) and SIRI, NLR, LMR, and atherosclerosis were significantly correlated. After adjusting for confounding factors, BT, FT, TT, and LMR were negatively correlated with atherosclerosis (odds ratio [OR] < 1, p < .05), and SIRI and NLR were positively associated with atherosclerosis (OR > 1, p < .05). According to the ROC curve results, the area under the curve (AUG) of BT is 0.870, and the optimal threshold point is 4.875. The AUG of SIRI is 0.864, and the best threshold point is 0.769. Low testosterone and high inflammatory levels are closely related to atherosclerosis. Testosterone (TT, FT, and BT) and new inflammatory markers, SIRI, NLR, and LMR, are associated with carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged and elderly men.

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Infliximab and adalimumab are monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) used to manage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) has been proven to prevent immunogenicity, to achieve better long-term clinical results and to save costs in IBD treatment. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on cost-effectiveness analyses of studies that apply TDM of anti-TNF in IBD and to provide a critical analysis of the best scientific knowledge available in the literature. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Cost-effectiveness of the TDM strategies was presented as total costs, cost savings, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Thirteen studies that examined the health economics of TDM of anti-TNF in IBD from 2013 to 2021 were included. Eight of them (61.5%) achieved a score between 17 and 23 on the CHEERS checklist. The comparison between the TDM strategy and an empirical strategy was cost saving. The ICER between reactive TDM and an empirical strategy was dominated (favorable) by reactive TDM, whereas the ICER value for proactive TDM compared to an empirical strategy ranged from EUR 56,845 to 3,901,554. This systematic review demonstrated that a TDM strategy is cost-effective or cost-saving in IBD.

Approaches for the detection and analysis of anti-drug antibodies to biopharmaceuticals: A review

Antibody-based therapeutic agents and other biopharmaceuticals are now used in the treatment of many diseases. However, when these biopharmaceuticals are administrated to patients, an immune reaction may occur that can reduce the drug's efficacy and lead to adverse side effects. The immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals can be evaluated by detecting and measuring antibodies that have been produced against these drugs, or anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Methods for ADA detection and analysis can be important during the selection of a therapeutic approach based on such drugs and is crucial when developing and testing new biopharmaceuticals. This review examines approaches that have been used for ADA detection, measurement, and characterization. Many of these approaches are based on immunoassays and antigen binding tests, including homogeneous mobility shift assays. Other techniques that have been used for the analysis of ADAs are capillary electrophoresis, reporter gene assays, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The general principles of each approach will be discussed, along with their recent applications with regards to ADA analysis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Anti-tumour necrosis factor α antibodies and circulating lymphocyte phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Circulating lymphocyte subtypes are not fully explored parameters for monitoring chronic T cell activation during inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), one of the main mediators of IBD related inflammation induces expression of CD70 on T cells. CD70 limits T cell expansion and controls CD27 receptor on activated B lymphocytes. Aim of this study was to assess the number and the frequency of CD70+ T cells and CD27+ B cells in IBD patients during inactive phase of the disease under or without anti-TNFα treatment.

DESIGN

We studied 91 patients with inactive IBD, 31 untreated, 29 treated with infliximab (IFX), and 31 treated with adalimumab (ADA). Lymphocyte phenotypes were assessed by flow cytometry using anti-CD45, CD19, CD27, CD3, and CD70 monoclonal antibodies. IFX and ADA actual capacity of TNFα neutralization in serum was estimated by the recoveryELISA technique.

RESULTS

Whereas CD3+ T cells were increased in treated compared to untreated patients, the percentage of the CD70+ T cells was significantly lower in treated patients indicating a 'cooling' effect of the biological therapy. This effect differs between samples according to the therapeutic range of the circulating drug. Although the CD19+ B-cell percentage tended to be lower in treated patients, CD19+27+ memory B cells did not show significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of peripheral blood CD70+ T cells was significantly reduced by treatment with anti-TNFα antibodies. Monitoring of this parameter of T cells can give better insight to the disease progression and therapy application in IBD patients.

Biomarkers of disease activity and other factors as predictors of adalimumab pharmacokinetics in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is commonly treated with adalimumab. The main objective of the study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of adalimumab in IBD patients evaluating the potential biomarkers of disease activity and other factors and its implications in adalimumab dosing. A prospective observational study was performed in adult patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis treated with adalimumab and following a proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of serum concentrations. Adalimumab serum concentrations (ASC) were quantified mainly prior the administration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on 303 ASC data of 104 IBD patients using non-linear mixed effect modelling approach. Sixty-five ASC from 20 additional patients were randomly selected as an external validation group. A one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination best describe the ASC time course. Body mass index (BMI), faecal calprotectin (FCP), unexplained decline in ASC and the specific administration pen device exhibited significant influence on apparent clearance (p-value < 0.001). FCP was the inflammatory activity biomarker showing the most relevant impact on adalimumab exposure, higher than C-reactive protein and albumin, and may be useful for adalimumab dosing adjustment. The population-based pharmacokinetic model developed adequately characterized adalimumab exposure in IBD patients. The unexplained decline in ASC, FCP, BMI and the specific administration pen device were identified as meaningful variables significantly influencing adalimumab pharmacokinetics.

Assessment of Placental Disposition of Infliximab and Etanercept in Women With Autoimmune Diseases and in the Ex Vivo Perfused Placenta

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are increasingly applied during pregnancy without clear knowledge of the impact on placenta and fetus. We assessed placental transfer and exposure to infliximab (n = 3) and etanercept (n = 3) in women with autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, we perfused healthy term placentas for 6 hours with 100 µg/mL infliximab (n = 4) or etanercept (n = 5). In pregnant women, infliximab transferred into cord blood but also entered the placenta (cord‐to‐maternal ratio of 1.6 ± 0.4, placenta‐to‐maternal ratio of 0.3 ± 0.1, n = 3). For etanercept, a cord‐to‐maternal ratio of 0.04 and placenta‐to‐maternal ratio of 0.03 was observed in one patient only. In ex vivo placenta perfusions, the extent of placental transfer did not differ between the drugs. Final concentrations in the fetal compartment for infliximab and etanercept were 0.3 ± 0.3 and 0.2 ± 0.2 µg/mL, respectively. However, in placental tissue, infliximab levels exceeded those of etanercept (19 ± 6 vs. 1 ± 3 µg/g, P < 0.001). In conclusion, tissue exposure to infliximab is higher than that of etanercept both in vivo as well as in ex vivo perfused placentas. However, initial placental transfer, as observed ex vivo, does not differ between infliximab and etanercept when administered in equal amounts. The difference in placental tissue exposure to infliximab and etanercept may be of clinical relevance and warrants further investigation. More specifically, we suggest that future studies should look into the occurrence of placental TNF inhibition and possible consequences thereof.

A 3-year prospective study of a multidisciplinary early proactive therapeutic drug monitoring programme of infliximab treatments in inflammatory bowel disease

AIMS

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of trough serum infliximab concentrations has been mainly used in case of loss of response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a multidisciplinary early proactive TDM (mep-TDM) programme for dose adjustment.

METHODS

A 3-year prospective study was conducted based on a sample of 81 patients who started treatment and were subsequently subjected to mep-TDM with the first control at week 14. Data of a historical control group of 72 patients treated with infliximab and managed with empirical dosing were included. Effectiveness variables were treatment failure, IBD-related surgery and IBD-related hospitalization. Safety variables were serious infusion reactions (SIRs) and adverse reactions. Cox regression was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

In the mep-TDM study group, compared to the control group, there was a significant reduction in the risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.92; P = .037), IBD-related surgery (HR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.65; P = .012) and hospitalization (HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.87; P = .022). SIRs were lower in the mep-TDM group (2.5% vs 10.4%; P < .050); the incidence of adverse reactions was similar (3.7% vs 3.9%; p > .999).

CONCLUSION

This study found that compared to empirical dosing, mep-TDM is associated with improved efficacy and safety of infliximab therapy, reduced IBD-related hospitalization and surgery and incidence of SIRs, and increasing long-term durability of treatment effects.

Do Androgens Modulate the Pathophysiological Pathways of Inflammation? Appraising the Contemporary Evidence

The role of testosterone in the pathophysiology of inflammation is of critical clinical importance; however, no universal mechanism(s) has been advanced to explain the complex and interwoven pathways of androgens in the attenuation of the inflammatory processes. PubMed and EMBASE searches were performed, including the following key words: "testosterone", "androgens", "inflammatory cytokines", "inflammatory biomarkers" with focus on clinical studies as well as basic scientific studies in human and animal models. Significant benefits of testosterone therapy in ameliorating or attenuating the symptoms of several chronic inflammatory diseases were reported. Because anti⁻tumor necrosis factor therapy is the mainstay for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease; including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and because testosterone therapy in hypogonadal men with chronic inflammatory conditions reduce tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), IL-1β, and IL-6, we suggest that testosterone therapy attenuates the inflammatory process and reduces the burden of disease by mechanisms inhibiting inflammatory cytokine expression and function. Mechanistically, androgens regulate the expression and function of inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and CRP (C-reactive protein). Here, we suggest that testosterone regulates multiple and overlapping cellular and molecular pathways involving a host of immune cells and biochemical factors that converge to contribute to attenuation of the inflammatory process.