Use of Automated Bone Age for Critical Growth Assessment

Early characteristics of bone deficits in children with Fontan palliation

BACKGROUND

This is a cross-sectional study aiming to understand the early characteristics and background of bone health impairment in clinically well children with Fontan circulation.

METHODS

We enrolled 10 clinically well children with Fontan palliation (operated >5 years before study entrance, Tanner stage ≤3, age 12.1 ± 1.77 years, 7 males) and 11 healthy controls (age 12.0 ± 1.45 years, 9 males) at two children's hospitals. All patients underwent peripheral quantitative CT. For the Fontan group, we obtained clinical characteristics, NYHA class, cardiac index by MRI, dual x-ray absorptiometry, and biochemical studies. Linear regression was used to compare radius and tibia peripheral quantitative CT measures between Fontan patients and controls.

RESULTS

All Fontan patients were clinically well (NYHA class 1 or 2, cardiac index 4.85 ± 1.51 L/min/m2) and without significant comorbidities. Adjusted trabecular bone mineral density, cortical thickness, and bone strength index at the radius were significantly decreased in Fontan patients compared to controls with mean differences -30.13 mg/cm3 (p = 0.041), -0.31 mm (p = 0.043), and -6.65 mg2/mm4 (p = 0.036), respectively. No differences were found for tibial measures. In Fontan patients, the mean height-adjusted lumbar bone mineral density and total body less head z scores were -0.46 ± 1.1 and -0.63 ± 1.1, respectively, which are below the average, but within normal range for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinically well Fontan cohort, we found significant bone deficits by peripheral quantitative CT in the radius but not the tibia, suggesting non-weight-bearing bones may be more vulnerable to the unique haemodynamics of the Fontan circulation.

A simple method for bone age assessment: the capitohamate planimetry

Objectives

To determine if the capitohamate (CH) planimetry could be a reliable indicator of bone age, and to compare it with Greulich-Pyle (GP) method.

Methods

This retrospective study included 391 children (age, 1–180 months). Two reviewers manually measured the areas of the capitate and hamate on plain radiographs. CH planimetry was defined as the measurement of the sum of areas of the capitate and hamate. Two reviewers independently applied the CH planimetry and GP methods in 109 children whose heights were at the 50th percentile of the growth chart.

Results

There was a strong positive correlation between chronological age and CH planimetry measurement (right, r = 0.9702; left, r = 0.9709). There was no significant difference in accuracy between CH planimetry (84.39–84.46 %) and the GP method (85.15–87.66 %) (p ≥ 0.0867). The interobserver reproducibility of CH planimetry (precision, 4.42 %; 95 % limits of agreement [LOA], −10.5 to 13.4 months) was greater than that of the GP method (precision, 8.45 %; LOA, −29.5 to 21.1 months).

Conclusions

CH planimetry may be a reliable method for bone age assessment.

Key Points

• Bone age assessment is important in the work-up of paediatric endocrine disorders.

• Radiography of the left hand is widely used to estimate bone age.

• Capitatohamate planimetry is a reliable and reproducible method for assessing bone age.

Automatic Determination of the Greulich-Pyle Bone Age as an Alternative Approach for Chinese Children with Discordant Bone Age

BACKGROUND

Automated bone age (BA) rating using BoneXpert is being adopted worldwide. This study investigated whether manual matching of hand radiographs could be replaced by BoneXpert for BA ratings of Chinese children with delayed or advanced BA.

METHODS

482 left-hand radiographs from 482 children (aged 2-16 years) with discordant BA were evaluated by BoneXpert and manually by 4 radiology residents using the Greulich and Pyle atlas. Radiographs whose BoneXpert BA deviated by >1 year from manual assessment were rerated by 2 attending radiologists in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

Among all 482 radiographs, 46 (9.5%) radiographs were rerated and no radiographs were rejected. Differences between BoneXpert and manual rating of 28 (5.8%) cases were >1 year. The manual BAs of the 28 radiographs were all >10 years and greater than the BoneXpert BAs. The root mean square deviation between the residents and BoneXpert was 0.56 for these children (95% CI 0.53-0.61).

CONCLUSION

BoneXpert agreed with manual BA rating in 94.2% of the images. Therefore, BoneXpert could be used as an alternative for the radiology residents to make an initial BA estimation. Modification of BoneXpert should provide greater accuracy for the estimation of BA in children aged >10 years with discordant BA.