Single-dose pharmacokinetics of sotalol in a pediatric population with supraventricular and/or ventricular tachyarrhythmia

Pharmacological Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Fetal and Neonatal Periods: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES)

Disorders of the cardiac rhythm may occur in both the fetus and neonate. Because of the immature myocardium, the hemodynamic consequences of either bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias may be far more significant than in mature physiological states. Treatment options are limited in the fetus and neonate because of limited vascular access, patient size, and the significant risk/benefit ratio of any intervention. In addition, exposure of the fetus or neonate to either persistent arrhythmias or antiarrhythmic medications may have yet-to-be-determined long-term developmental consequences. This scientific statement discusses the mechanism of arrhythmias, pharmacological treatment options, and distinct aspects of pharmacokinetics for the fetus and neonate. From the available current data, subjects of apparent consistency/consensus are presented, as well as future directions for research in terms of aspects of care for which evidence has not been established.

Informing a Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Infant Drug Exposure From Human Milk: Application of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Lactation Model for Sotalol

Characterization of infant drug exposure through human milk is important and underexplored. Because infant plasma concentrations are not frequently collected in clinical lactation studies, modeling and simulation approaches can integrate physiology, available milk concentrations, and pediatric data to inform exposure in breastfeeding infants. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was built for sotalol, a renally eliminated drug, to simulate infant drug exposure from human milk. Intravenous and oral adult models were built, optimized, and scaled to an oral pediatric model for a breastfeeding-relevant age group (<2 years). Model simulations captured the data that were put aside for verification. The resulting pediatric model was applied to predict the impacts of sex, infant body size, breastfeeding frequency, age, and maternal dose (240 and 433 mg) on drug exposure during breastfeeding. Simulations suggest a minimal effect of sex or frequency on total sotalol exposure. Infants in the 90th percentile in height and weight have predicted exposures ≈20% higher than infants of the same age in the 10th percentile due to increased milk intake. The simulated infant exposures increase throughout the first 2 weeks of life and are maintained at the highest concentrations in weeks 2-4, with a consistent decrease observed as infants age. Simulations suggest that breastfeeding infants will have plasma concentrations in the lower range observed in infants administered sotalol. With further validation on additional drugs, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approaches could use lactation data to a greater extent and provide comprehensive information to support decisions regarding medication use during breastfeeding.

Sotalol in neonates for arrhythmias: Dosing, safety, and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Various agents may be utilized to manage supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in neonates and infants. Recently, sotalol has piqued interest given its reported success in managing neonates and infants with SVTs, especially with the intravenous formulation. While the manufacturer recommends using an age-related nomogram in neonates and young infants to guide doses, clinical reports describe various dosing based on weight (mg/kg) or on body surface area (BSA) in mg/m2 . Given the reported variation in clinical practice with regard to dosing in neonates, there is a gap in the literature and translation into clinical practice regarding applicability of the nomogram into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA in neonates for SVT.

METHODS

This is a single center retrospective study evaluating effective sotalol dosing from January 2011 and June 2021 (inclusive). Neonates who received intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) sotalol for SVT were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA. Secondary outcomes include comparison of doses to the manufacturer nomogram, description of dose titrations, reported adverse outcomes, and change in therapy. Two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible patients were included in this study. The median (range) age and weight were 16.5 (1-28) days and 3.2 (1.8-4.9) kg, respectively. The median initial dose was 7.3 (1.9-10.8) mg/kg or 114.3 (30.9-166.7) mg/m2 /day. Fourteen (45.2%) of patients required a dose increase for SVT control. The median dose required for rhythm control was 8.5 (2-14.8) mg/kg/day or 120.7 (30.9-225) mg/m2 /day. Of note, the median recommended dose per manufacturer nomogram for our patients would have been 51.3 (16.2-73.8) mg/m2 /day, which is significantly lower than both the initial dose (p < .001) and final doses (p < .001) utilized in our study. A total of 7 (22.9%) patients were uncontrolled on sotalol monotherapy using our dosing regimen. Two patients (6.5%) had reports of hypotension and one patient (3.3%) had a report of bradycardia requiring discontinuation of therapy. The average change in baseline QTC following sotalol initiation was 6.8%. Twenty-seven (87.1%), 3 (9.7%), 1 (3.3%) experienced prolongation, no change, or a decrease in QTc, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a sotalol strategy significantly higher than the manufacture dose recommendations are required for rhythm control in neonates with SVT. There were few adverse events reported with this dosing. Further prospective studies would be advantageous to confirm these findings.

Early experience with intravenous sotalol in children with and without congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmias are common in the pediatric population. In patients unable to take oral medications or in need of acute therapy, options of intravenous (IV) antiarrhythmic medications are limited. Recently IV sotalol has become readily available, but experience in children is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience with the use of IV sotalol in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric patients receiving IV sotalol was performed. Patient demographic characteristics, presence of congenital heart disease, arrhythmia type, efficacy of IV sotalol use, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (26 (55%) male and 24 (51%) with congenital heart disease) received IV sotalol at a median age of 2.05 years (interquartile range 0.07-10.03 years) and a median weight of 12.8 kg (interquartile range 3.8-34.2 kg), and 13 (28%) received IV sotalol in the acute postoperative setting. Supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 40 patients (85%) and ventricular tachycardia in 7 (15%). Among 24 patients receiving IV sotalol for an active arrhythmia, acute termination was achieved in 21 (88%). Twenty-three patients received IV sotalol as maintenance therapy for recurrent arrhythmias owing to inability to take oral antiarrhythmic medications; 19 (83%) were controlled with sotalol monotherapy. No patient required discontinuation of IV sotalol secondary to adverse effects, proarrhythmia, or QT prolongation.

CONCLUSION

IV sotalol is an effective antiarrhythmic option for pediatric patients and may be an excellent agent for acute termination of active arrhythmias. It was well tolerated, with no patient requiring discontinuation secondary to adverse effects.

Management of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants

Supraventricular tachycardia is the most common tachyarrhythmia encountered in infants. In older children and adults, definitive treatment of the supraventricular tachycardia substrate with catheter ablation is a common approach to management. However, in infants, the risks of catheter ablation are significantly higher, and the patients often outgrow the potential to experience episodes. Therefore, antiarrhythmic medications are often utilized to minimize the likelihood of experiencing episodes. This article reviews the common arrhythmia mechanisms encountered in infants and the medications used to treat these patients.

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society 2014 Consensus Statement: Pharmacotherapies in Cardiac Critical Care Antiarrhythmics

OBJECTIVE

Arrhythmias are a common occurrence in critically ill pediatric patients. Pharmacotherapy is a usual modality for treatment and prevention of arrhythmias in this patient population. This review will highlight particular arrhythmias in the pediatric critical care population and discuss salient points of pharmacotherapy of these arrhythmias. The mechanisms of action for the various agents, potential adverse events, place in therapy, and evidence for their use will be summarized.

DATA SOURCES

The literature was searched for articles related to the topic. Expertise of the authors and a consensus of the editors were additional sources of data in the article.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The author team synthesized the current pharmacology and recommendations and present them in this review. Tables were generated to summarize the state of the art evidence-based practice.

CONCLUSION

Specialized knowledge as to the safe and effective use of the antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy in the intensive care setting can lead to safe and effective rhythm management in patients with complex heart disease.

Paediatric cardiovascular clinical trials: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov and the Food and Drug Administration Pediatric Drug Labeling Database

Recent regulatory initiatives in the United States of America and Europe have transformed the paediatric clinical trials landscape by significantly increasing capital investment and paediatric trial volume. The purpose of this manuscript was to review the impact of these initiatives on the paediatric cardiovascular trials landscape when compared with other paediatric sub-specialties. We also evaluate factors that may have contributed to the success or failure of recent major paediatric cardiovascular trials so as to inform the optimal design and conduct of future trials in the field.

Drug labeling and exposure in neonates

IMPORTANCE

Federal legislation has led to a notable increase in pediatric studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), resulting in new pediatric information in product labeling. However, approximately 50% of drug labels still have insufficient information on safety, efficacy, or dosing in children. Neonatal information in labeling is even scarcer because neonates comprise a vulnerable subpopulation for which end-point development is lagging and studies are more challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify progress made in neonatal studies and neonatal information in product labeling as a result of recent legislation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We identified a cohort of drug studies between 1997 and 2010 that included neonates as a result of pediatric legislation using information available on the FDA website. We determined what studies were published in the medical literature, the legislation responsible for the studies, and the resulting neonatal labeling changes. We then examined the use of these drugs in a cohort of neonates admitted to 290 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) (the Pediatrix Data Warehouse) in the United States from 2005 to 2010.

EXPOSURE

Infants exposed to a drug studied in neonates as identified by the FDA website.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Number of drug studies with neonates and rate of exposure per 1000 admissions among infants admitted to an NICU.

RESULTS

In a review of the FDA databases, we identified 28 drugs studied in neonates and 24 related labeling changes. Forty-one studies encompassed the 28 drugs, and 31 (76%) of these were published. Eleven (46%) of the 24 neonatal labeling changes established safety and effectiveness. In a review of a cohort of 446,335 hospitalized infants, we identified 399 drugs used and 1,525,739 drug exposures in the first 28 postnatal days. Thirteen (46%) of the 28 drugs studied in neonates were not used in NICUs; 8 (29%) were used in fewer than 60 neonates. Of the drugs studied, ranitidine was used most often (15,627 neonates, 35 exposures per 1000 admissions).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Few drug labeling changes made under pediatric legislation include neonates. Most drugs studied are either not used or rarely used in US NICUs. Strategies to increase the study of safe and effective drugs for neonates are needed.

High-dose sotalol is safe and effective in neonates and infants with refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose sotalol in neonates and infants with refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). SVT in neonates and infants can be refractory to primary therapies; therefore, secondary agents, e.g., sotalol, are often required to obtain control of SVT. Age-factor nomogram dosing of sotalol is widely used; however, our institution uses greater doses based on body surface area (approximately 150-200 mg/m(2)/d). A retrospective review of 78 inpatients receiving sotalol, after failing another antiarrthymic medication, at our institution from 2001 to 2008 was performed. Corrected QT intervals (QTc), 24-h Holter-monitoring results, and outpatient records were reviewed to assess safety and efficacy for patients ≤ 2 years of age. Median patient age at the time of initiation of therapy was 24 days (range 3-728). Forty-eight patients (62%) were neonates, and 36 (46%) had congenital heart disease. The median sotalol dosage was 152 mg/m(2)/day (range 65-244). The SVT of 70 patients (90%) was controlled with sotalol. No patients experienced significant QTc prolongation or proarrhythmia. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.3 ± 0.24 years. High-dose sotalol allows for safe and rapid control of refractory tachyarrhythmias in this young age group.

Atrial tachycardias in young adults and adolescents with congenital heart disease: conversion using single dose oral sotalol

Atrial tachyarrhythmias are a chronic long-term hazard in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). These arrhythmias contribute to ventricular dysfunction, heart failure can contribute to sudden death. We performed a prospective study of oral sotalol for the conversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias in adults and adolescents with congenital heart disease and stable hemodynamics.

METHODS

Patients were admitted and given oral sotalol in an inpatient, monitored setting. The initial dose was targeted at 2 mg/kg. Antiarrhythmic drugs other than digoxin were stopped.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled. The average patient age was 20 years (12-39). Four had atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) and 15 had atrial reentry tachycardia (IART). Nine had Fontan physiology. Permanent pacing therapies had failed to restore sinus or paced rhythm consistently in 6 patients. Overall 16 of 19 atrial tachyarrhythmias (84%) converted with single dose oral sotalol. AET converted to sinus or paced rhythm in 3/4 patients and IART in 13/15 patients. The average times to conversion were 98 and 145 min, respectively. Two patients required pacemakers due to sinus bradycardia. One patient had a lethal thromboembolic event 2 days after conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral sotalol offers an effective alternative to direct current cardioversion in adults and adolescents with CHD and hemodynamically stable atrial tachyarrhythmias. Conversion with sotalol at ~2 mg/kg generally occurred within 2 h. Vigilance for thromboembolism must be maintained as well as caution for those with bradycardia without pacemakers in this patient population. There are theoretical and practical advantages of sotalol over cardioversion.

Guidelines on paediatric dosing on the basis of developmental physiology and pharmacokinetic considerations

The approach to paediatric drug dosing needs to be based on the physiological characteristics of the child and the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug. This review summarises the current knowledge on developmental changes in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and combines this knowledge with in vivo and in vitro pharmacokinetic data that are currently available. In addition, dosage adjustments based on practical problems, such as child-friendly formulations and feeding regimens, disease state, genetic make-up and environmental influences are presented. Modification of a dosage based on absorption, depends on the route of absorption, the physico chemical properties of the drug and the age of the child. For oral drug absorption, a distinction should be made between the very young and children over a few weeks old. In the latter case, it is likely that practical considerations, like appropriate formulations, have much greater relevance to oral drug absorption. The volume of distribution (V(d)) may be altered in children. Hydrophilic drugs with a high V(d) in adults should be normalised to bodyweight in young children (age <2 years), whereas hydrophilic drugs with a low V(d) in adults should be normalised to body surface area (BSA) in these children. For drugs that are metabolised by the liver, the effect of the V(d) becomes apparent in children <2 months of age. In general, only the first dose should be based on the V(d); subsequent doses should be determined by the clearance. Pharmacokinetic studies on renal and liver function clarify that a distinction should be made between maturation and growth of the organs. After the maturation process has finished, the main influences on the clearance of drugs are growth and changes in blood flow of the liver and kidney. Drugs that are primarily metabolised by the liver should be administered with extreme care until the age of 2 months. Modification of dosing should be based on response and on therapeutic drug monitoring. At the age of 2-6 months, a general guideline based on bodyweight may be used. After 6 months of age, BSA is a good marker as a basis for drug dosing. However, even at this age, drugs that are primarily metabolised by cytochrome P450 2D6 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase should be normalised to bodyweight. In the first 2 years of life, the renal excretion rate should be determined by markers of renal function, such as serum creatinine and p-aminohippuric acid clearance. A dosage guideline for drugs that are significantly excreted by the kidney should be based on the determination of renal function in first 2 years of life. After maturation, the dose should be normalised to BSA. These guidelines are intended to be used in clinical practice and to form a basis for more research. The integration of these guidelines, and combining them with pharmacodynamic effects, should be considered and could form a basis for further study.

Development of a safe and effective pediatric dosing regimen for sotalol based on population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with supraventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop age-specific dosage guidelines for sotalol in children with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) based on a population pharmacokinetic covariate analysis, clinical trial simulations, and pharmacodynamics.

BACKGROUND

A rapid onset of an effective and safe antiarrhythmic sotalol therapy, especially for infants and neonates, is frequently delayed because of age-dependent interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with SVT (mean age 3.51 years [range 0.03 to 17 years]) were analyzed after oral sotalol doses of 1.0 to 9.9 mg/kg/day using population pharmacokinetic analysis and clinical trial simulation (n = 76), pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling for QT interval prolongation (n = 32), and for the concentration-antiarrhythmic-response relationship (n = 15).

RESULTS

Inter-individual differences in oral clearance and volume of distribution could largely be attributed to size and weight differences, with an additional age effect on clearance in children younger than one year. Neonates showed a higher sensitivity toward QTc interval prolongation compared with older patients. In a subgroup of 15 patients, one-half of the patients converted into sinus rhythm at sotalol trough levels of 0.4 mug/ml and more than 95% at 1.0 mug/ml. Dosing recommendations derived for different age groups based on these findings were starting dose and target dose of 2 and 4 mg/kg/day for neonates, 3 and 6 mg/kg/day for infants and children <6 years, and 2 and 4 mg/kg/day for children >6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an example for rational drug dosage in children that copes with interpatient variability and can be easily switched to an individually guided therapy based on effective sotalol trough levels.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sotalol in pediatric patients with supraventricular or ventricular tachyarrhythmia

AIMS

To derive useful pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) information for guiding the clinical use of sotalol in pediatric patients with supraventricular (SVT) or ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT).

METHODS

Two studies were conducted in-patients with SVT or VT in the age range between birth and 12 years old. Both studies used an extemporaneously compounded formulation prepared from sotalol HCl tablets. In the PK study, following a single dose of 30 mg/m2 sotalol, extensive blood samples (n = 10) were taken. The PK-PD study used a dose escalation design with doses of 10, 30, and 70 mg/m2, each administered three times at 8-hr intervals without a washout. Six ECG recordings for determination of QT and RR were obtained prior to the initial dose of sotalol. Four blood samples were collected six ECG's were determined during the third interval at each dose level. Plasma concentrations of sotalol (C) were assayed by LC/MS/MS. The data analysis used NONMEM to obtain the population PK and PD parameter estimates. The individual PK and PD parameters were estimated with empirical Bayes methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 611 C from 58 patients, 477 QTc and 499 RR measurements from 23 and 22 patients, respectively, were available for analysis. The PK of sotalol was best described by a linear two-compartment model. Oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of central compartment (Vc/F) were linearly correlated with body surface area (BSA), body weight or age. CL/F was also linearly correlated with creatinine clearance. The best predictor for both CL/F and Vc/F was BSA. The remaining intersubject coefficients of variation (CV's) in CL/F, and Vc/F were 21.6% and 20.3%, respectively. The relationship of QTc to C was adequately described by a linear model. The intersubject CV's in slope (SL) and intercept (E0) were 56.2 and 4.7%, respectively. The relationship of RR to C was also adequately described by a linear model in which the baseline RR and SL were related to age or BSA. The intersubject CV's for SL and E0 were 86.7 and 14.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BSA is the best predictor for the PK of sotalol. Both QTc and RR effects are linearly related to C. No covariates are found for the QTc-C relation, while the RR-C relation shows age or BSA dependency.