Diabetes Transition Care From an Inpatient to Outpatient Setting in a Veteran Population: Quality Improvement Pilot Study

The Impact of a Diabetes Transitions of Care Clinic on Hospital Utilization and Patient Care

BACKGROUND

There is currently limited guidance from the American Diabetes Association regarding transitions of care for patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

This study's aim was to determine the impact of a diabetes-specific transitions of care clinic (TOCC) on hospital utilization and patient outcomes in recently discharged patients with diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients seen by TOCC as compared with similar patients discharged from the study institution the year prior. The primary outcome was a composite of the number of unique patients with readmissions/emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included a subcomponent analysis of readmissions/ED visits, index hospital length of stay (LOS), and to describe clinical interventions made in clinic. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Office of Responsible Research Practice at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

RESULTS

There were 165 patients in the TOCC group and 157 in the control group based on the matching criteria. There was a statistically significant decrease in the primary outcome in the TOCC group versus the control group (18% vs 36%, P < 0.001). In evaluation of its subcomponents, there was a statically significant decrease in patients with readmissions (11% vs 26%, P < 0.001) but not ED visits (10% vs 17%, P = 0.096). The LOS for the TOCC group was shorter at 4 days versus 5 days in the control group (P = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The implementation of a diabetes-specific TOCC can decrease both readmissions and ED visits and may impact hospital LOS. In addition, a TOCC can be used to identify gaps in preventive care. The results from this study may help support the creation of similar TOCC at other institutions.

Implementing health system improvement: resources and strategies for interprofessional teams

Health system improvement (HSI) is focused on systematic changes to organisational processes and practices to improve the efficient delivery of safe care and quality outcomes. Guidelines that specify how interprofessional teams conduct HSI and knowledge translation are needed. We address this urgent requirement providing health professional teams with resources and strategies to investigate, analyse and implement system-level improvements. HSI encompasses similar, yet different, inter-related activities across a continuum. The continuum spans three categories of activities, such as quality improvement, health management research and translational health management research. A HSI decision making guide and checklist, comprising six-steps, is presented that can be used to select and plan projects. This resource comprises six interconnected steps including, defining the activity, project outcome, aim, use of evidence, appropriate methodology and implementation plan. Each step has been developed focusing on an objective, actions and resources. HSI activities provide a foundation for interprofessional collaboration, allowing multiple professions to create, share and disseminate knowledge for improved healthcare. When planned and executed well, HSI projects assist clinical and corporate staff to make evidence-informed decisions and directions for the benefit of the service, organisation and sector.

Interventions incorporating a multi-disciplinary team approach and a dedicated care team can help reduce preventable hospital readmissions of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A scoping review of current literature

AIMS

This review aimed to identify interventions that hospitals can implement to reduce preventable hospital readmissions of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A scoping review framework was utilised to inform the overall process. The electronic databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, the University of New England (UNE) library search engine and Google Scholar were utilised to search for relevant literature.

RESULTS

The results from this review demonstrate that interventions started at index admission for people diagnosed with T2DM can result in reductions in hospital readmissions. Common strategies which attributed to the success of interventions in reducing hospital readmissions of people with T2DM included a multidisciplinary team approach, a dedicated care team, certified diabetes educator appointments, basic survival skills education and influencing hospital protocol development and implementation.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review is an attempt at exploring and synthesising current research on interventions that hospitals can implement to reduce preventable hospital readmissions of people with T2DM.

Predicting and Preventing Acute Care Re-Utilization by Patients with Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute care re-utilization, i.e., hospital readmission and post-discharge Emergency Department (ED) use, is a significant driver of healthcare costs and a marker for healthcare quality. Diabetes is a major contributor to acute care re-utilization and associated costs. The goals of this paper are to (1) review the epidemiology of readmissions among patients with diabetes, (2) describe models that predict readmission risk, and (3) address various strategies for reducing the risk of acute care re-utilization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hospital readmissions and ED visits by diabetes patients are common and costly. Major risk factors for readmission include sociodemographics, comorbidities, insulin use, hospital length of stay (LOS), and history of readmissions, most of which are non-modifiable. Several models for predicting the risk of readmission among diabetes patients have been developed, two of which have reasonable accuracy in external validation. In retrospective studies and mostly small randomized controlled trials (RCTs), interventions such as inpatient diabetes education, inpatient diabetes management services, transition of care support, and outpatient follow-up are generally associated with a reduction in the risk of acute care re-utilization. Data on readmission risk and readmission risk reduction interventions are limited or lacking among patients with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19. The evidence supporting post-discharge follow-up by telephone is equivocal and also limited. Acute care re-utilization of patients with diabetes presents an important opportunity to improve healthcare quality and reduce costs. Currently available predictive models are useful for identifying higher risk patients but could be improved. Machine learning models, which are becoming more common, have the potential to generate more accurate acute care re-utilization risk predictions. Tools embedded in electronic health record systems are needed to translate readmission risk prediction models into clinical practice. Several risk reduction interventions hold promise but require testing in multi-site RCTs to prove their generalizability, scalability, and effectiveness.

Suggested Canadian Standards for Perioperative/Periprocedure Glycemic Management in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this quality initiative was to develop consensus standards for glycemic management of patients with diabetes who undergo surgical procedures in Canada.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was used to gather broad stakeholder input and arrive at a consensus for perioperative/periprocedure diabetes management.

RESULTS

Glycemic management standards were developed for the following categories: Organization of Care; Preoperative Assessment; Immediate Preoperative and Intraoperative; Postanesthesia Care Unit or Recovery Room; Postoperative Period; and Transition to Outpatient Care.

CONCLUSIONS

It is anticipated these standards will serve as a basis to develop clinical tools to support the recommendations.

Impact of inpatient diabetes transitions of care consult on glycemic control

OBJECTIVE(S)

An evaluation of a diabetes consult service for hospitalized patients was completed to determine effect on glycemic control.

METHODS

This medical record review was conducted to determine impact of a short-term program on patients with diabetes. The electronic medical record was used to identify patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and hospitalized from September 2016 to September 2017. A case-control design was utilized to compare patients with an inpatient order for the diabetes transitions of care service to those receiving usual care. The consultation service consisted of inpatient diabetes education and follow-up post discharge. The HbA1c reduction of adult inpatients those who completed a consult (n = 67) and those who received usual care (n = 67) were compared. Statistical analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

For the primary outcome of HbA1c reduction at 3 months, absolute difference from baseline to 3 months in the intervention was -2.9 % compared to 0.9 % in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the service reduced HbA1c at 3 months and 6 months post-discharge, reduced 30-day all-cause readmissions, and increased percentage of patients with HbA1c <9.0 % at 6 months post-discharge.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

A consult-based diabetes transitions of care service decreased HbA1c versus usual care.

Compared benefits of educational programs dedicated to diabetic patients with or without community pharmacist involvement

Background:

International guidelines on diabetes control strongly encourage the setting-up of therapeutic educational programs (TEP). However, more than half of the patients fail to control their diabetes a few months post-TEP because of a lack of regular follow-up by medical professionals. The DIAB-CH is a TEP associated with the follow-up of diabetic patients by the community pharmacist.

Aim:

To compare the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) in diabetic patients of Control (neither TEP-H nor community pharmacist intervention), TEP-H (TEP in hospital only) and DIAB-CH (TEP-H plus community pharmacist follow-up) groups.

Methods:

A comparative cohort study design was applied. Patients included in the TEP-H from July 2017 to December 2017 were enrolled in the DIAB-CH group. The TEP-H session was conducted by a multidisciplinary team composed of two diabetologists, two dieticians and seven nurses. The HbA1c level and the BMI (when over 30 kg/m2at M0) of patients in Control (n= 20), TEP-H (n= 20) and DIAB-CH (n= 20) groups were collected at M0, M0 + 6 and M0 + 12 months. First, HbA1c and BMI were compared between M0, M6 and M12 in the three groups with the Friedman test, followed by the Benjamini-Hochberg post-test. Secondly, the HbA1c and BMI of the three groups were compared at M0, M6 and M12 using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Findings:

While no difference in HbA1c was measured between M0, M6 and M12 in the Control group, Hb1Ac was significantly reduced in both TEP-H and DIAB-CH groups between M0 and M6 (P= 0.0072 andP= 0.0034, respectively), and between M0 and M12 only in the DIAB-CH group (P= 0.0027). In addition, a significant decrease in the difference between the measured HbA1c and the target assigned by diabetologists was observed between M0 and M6 in both TEP-H and DIAB-CH groups (P= 0.0072 andP= 0.0044, respectively) but only for the patients of the DIAB-CH group between M0 and M12 (P= 0.0044). No significant difference (P> 0.05) in BMI between the groups was observed.

Conclusion:

The long-lasting benefit on glycemic control of multidisciplinary group sessions associated with community pharmacist-led educational interventions on self-care for diabetic patients was demonstrated in the present study. There is thus evidence pointing to the effectiveness of a community/hospital care collaboration of professionals on diabetes control in primary care.

Practical Recommendations for Transitioning Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from Hospital to Home

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide practical evidence-based recommendations for transitioning hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to home.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hospitalized patients who have newly diagnosed or poorly controlled T2DM require initiation or intensification of their outpatient diabetes regimen. Potential barriers to medication access and continuity of care should be identified early in the hospitalization. Throughout hospitalization, patients should receive diabetes education focused on basic survival skills and tailored to learning needs. Patients should leave the hospital with personalized discharge instructions that include a list of all medications and follow-up appointments with both the outpatient diabetes provider and a diabetes educator whenever possible. An approach to transitioning patients with T2DM from hospital to home that focuses on optimizing the patient's discharge diabetes regimen, anticipating patients' needs during the immediate post-discharge period, providing survival skills education, and ensuring continuation of diabetes care and education following hospital discharge has the potential to improve glycemic control and reduce emergency department visits and hospital readmissions.