Intravenous branched chain amino acid trial in marrow transplant recipients

WITHDRAWN: Nutrition support for bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2002. Bone marrow transplantation involves administration of toxic chemotherapy and infusion of marrow cells. After treatment, patients can develop poor appetite, mucositis and gastrointestinal failure, leading to malnutrition. To prevent this, parenteral nutrition (PN) support is often first choice but is associated with increased risk of infection. Enteral nutrition (EN) is an alternative, as is addition of substrates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy of EN or PN support for patients receiving bone marrow transplant.

SEARCH METHODS

Search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL in November 2000 and subsequently June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared one form of nutrition support with another, or control, for bone marrow transplant patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty nine studies were identified. Data were collected on participants' characteristics; adverse effects; neutropaenia; % change in body weight; graft versus host disease; and survival.

MAIN RESULTS

In two studies (82 participants) glutamine mouthwash reduced number of days patients were neutropenic (6.82 days, 95%CI (1.67 to 11.98) P = 0.009) compared with placebo. Three studies reported (103 participants) that patients receiving PN with glutamine had reduced hospital stay, 6.62 d (95%CI 3.47 to 9.77, P = 0.00004) compared with patients receiving standard PN. However, in the update a further study was added (147 participants) which altered the pooled results: duration in hospital may be increased for those who receive PN with additional glutamine - 0.22 days (95%CI (1.29 to 1.72). Two other studies reported that (73 participants) patients receiving PN plus glutamine had reduced incidence of positive blood cultures (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.65, P = 0.006) compared to those receiving standard PN. However, a study from the update (113 participants in total) showed the odds of having a positive blood culture have increased but are still less likely if the patient receives PN with glutamine compared to standard PN (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.04). When patients were given PN versus IV hydration, (25 participants) patients receiving PN had a higher incidence of line infections (OR 21.23, 95%CI 4.15 to 108.73, P = 0.0002) compared to those receiving standard IV fluids. The update identified one study which recognised that (55 participants) those who received IV were likely to spend less time in hospital, 3.30 days (95%CI -0.38 to 6.98, P = 0.08), although this result was not significant. As reported in the original review there remains no evaluable data to properly compare PN with EN.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update an additional study that compared PN and Glutamine versus standard PN showed that the certain benefits of parenteral nutrition with added glutamine compared to standard PN for reducing hospital stay are no longer definite. When PN with glutamine is compared with standard PN, patients may not leave hospital earlier, but do have reduced incidence of positive blood cultures, than those receiving standard PN. Where possible use of intravenous fluids and oral diet should be considered as a preference to parenteral nutrition, however, in the event of a patient suffering severe gastrointestinal failure even with a trial of enteral feeding, PN with the addition of glutamine could be considered.

Nutrition support for bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2002. Bone marrow transplantation involves administration of toxic chemotherapy and infusion of marrow cells. After treatment, patients can develop poor appetite, mucositis and gastrointestinal failure, leading to malnutrition. To prevent this, parenteral nutrition (PN) support is often first choice but is associated with increased risk of infection. Enteral nutrition (EN) is an alternative, as is addition of substrates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy of EN or PN support for patients receiving bone marrow transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL in November 2000 and subsequently June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared one form of nutrition support with another, or control, for bone marrow transplant patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty nine studies were identified. Data were collected on participants' characteristics; adverse effects; neutropaenia; % change in body weight; graft versus host disease; and survival.

MAIN RESULTS

In two studies (82 participants) glutamine mouthwash reduced number of days patients were neutropenic (6.82 days, 95%CI (1.67 to 11.98) P = 0.009) compared with placebo. Three studies reported (103 participants) that patients receiving PN with glutamine had reduced hospital stay, 6.62 d (95%CI 3.47 to 9.77, P = 0.00004) compared with patients receiving standard PN. However, in the update a further study was added (147 participants) which altered the pooled results: duration in hospital may be increased for those who receive PN with additional glutamine - 0.22 days (95%CI (1.29 to 1.72). Two other studies reported that (73 participants) patients receiving PN plus glutamine had reduced incidence of positive blood cultures (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.65, P = 0.006) compared to those receiving standard PN. However, a study from the update (113 participants in total) showed the odds of having a positive blood culture have increased but are still less likely if the patient receives PN with glutamine compared to standard PN (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.04). When patients were given PN versus IV hydration, (25 participants) patients receiving PN had a higher incidence of line infections (OR 21.23, 95%CI 4.15 to 108.73, P = 0.0002) compared to those receiving standard IV fluids. The update identified one study which recognised that (55 participants) those who received IV were likely to spend less time in hospital, 3.30 days (95%CI -0.38 to 6.98, P = 0.08), although this result was not significant. As reported in the original review there remains no evaluable data to properly compare PN with EN.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update an additional study that compared PN and Glutamine versus standard PN showed that the certain benefits of parenteral nutrition with added glutamine compared to standard PN for reducing hospital stay are no longer definite. When PN with glutamine is compared with standard PN, patients may not leave hospital earlier, but do have reduced incidence of positive blood cultures, than those receiving standard PN. Where possible use of intravenous fluids and oral diet should be considered as a preference to parenteral nutrition, however, in the event of a patient suffering severe gastrointestinal failure even with a trial of enteral feeding, PN with the addition of glutamine could be considered.

Nutrition support for bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2002. Bone marrow transplantation involves administration of toxic chemotherapy and infusion of marrow cells. After treatment, patients can develop poor appetite, mucositis and gastrointestinal failure, leading to malnutrition. To prevent this, parenteral nutrition (PN) support is often first choice but is associated with increased risk of infection. Enteral nutrition (EN) is an alternative, as is addition of substrates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy of EN or PN support for patients receiving bone marrow transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL in November 2000 and subsequently June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared one form of nutrition support with another, or control, for bone marrow transplant patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty nine studies were identified. Data were collected on participants' characteristics; adverse effects; neutropaenia; % change in body weight; graft versus host disease; and survival.

MAIN RESULTS

In two studies (82 participants) glutamine mouthwash reduced number of days patients were neutropenic (6.82 days, 95%CI (1.67 to 11.98) P = 0.009) compared with placebo. Three studies reported (103 participants) that patients receiving PN with glutamine had reduced hospital stay, 6.62 d (95%CI 3.47 to 9.77, P = 0.00004) compared with patients receiving standard PN. However, in the update a further study was added (147 participants) which altered the pooled results: duration in hospital may be increased for those who receive PN with additional glutamine - 0.22 days (95%CI (1.29 to 1.72). Two other studies reported that (73 participants) patients receiving PN plus glutamine had reduced incidence of positive blood cultures (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.65, P = 0.006) compared to those receiving standard PN. However, a study from the update (113 participants in total) showed the odds of having a positive blood culture have increased but are still less likely if the patient receives PN with glutamine compared to standard PN (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.04). When patients were given PN versus IV hydration, (25 participants) patients receiving PN had a higher incidence of line infections (OR 21.23, 95%CI 4.15 to 108.73, P = 0.0002) compared to those receiving standard IV fluids. The update identified one study which recognised that (55 participants) those who received IV were likely to spend less time in hospital, 3.30 days (95%CI -0.38 to 6.98, P = 0.08), although this result was not significant. As reported in the original review there remains no evaluable data to properly compare PN with EN.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update an additional study that compared PN and Glutamine versus standard PN showed that the certain benefits of parenteral nutrition with added glutamine compared to standard PN for reducing hospital stay are no longer definite. When PN with glutamine is compared with standard PN, patients may not leave hospital earlier, but do have reduced incidence of positive blood cultures, than those receiving standard PN. Where possible use of intravenous fluids and oral diet should be considered as a preference to parenteral nutrition, however, in the event of a patient suffering severe gastrointestinal failure even with a trial of enteral feeding, PN with the addition of glutamine could be considered.

Assessment of nutritional status in organ transplant: is transthyretin a reliable indicator?

Transthyretin has been proposed as a nutritional index to screen for malnutrition and monitor the metabolic response to dietary intervention. In the presence of inflammation, circulating transthyretin levels drop regardless of optimal caloric intake. In this case, due to its rapid turnover, the pattern of transthyretin, monitored by means of repeated measures, could indicate the metabolic status (catabolism vs. anabolism). The aim of this review is to investigate the possible role of transthyretin as a nutritional parameter in organ transplantation. The literature on nutritional assessment in transplantation was reviewed and all the data regarding circulating transthyretin levels were analyzed. It appears that, on the one hand, the transthyretin level reflects closely dietary manipulations; on the other hand, it is affected by the inflammatory status. Consequently, interpretation could be difficult during the acute phase immediately after the transplant. Moreover, the role of transthyretin in monitoring the hepatic synthetic function in liver transplant is discussed. In conclusion, transthyretin is a reliable indicator of nutritional status in transplant candidates and potentially useful in the post-transplant phase if the inflammatory status is taken into account.

Nutritional and metabolic support in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a sophisticated procedure consisting of the administration of high-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by intravenous infusion of hemopoietic stem cells to reestablish marrow function when bone marrow is damaged or defective. BMT is used in the treatment of solid tumors, hematologic diseases, and autoimmune disorders. Artificial nutrition, total parenteral nutrition in particular, is provided to patients undergoing BMT to minimize the nutritional consequences of both the conditioning regimens (eg, mucositis of the gastrointestinal tract) and complications resulting from the procedure (eg, graft versus host disease and venoocclusive disease of the liver). Although artificial nutrition is now recognized as the standard of care for BMT patients, defined guidelines for the use of artificial nutrition in this clinical setting are lacking. During the past 2 decades, artificial nutrition in BMT patients has moved from simple supportive care to adjunctive therapy because of the possible benefits, not strictly nutritional, of specialized nutritional intervention. Although data exist documenting the beneficial role of special nutrients, such as lipids and glutamine, in the management of BMT recipients, the results obtained to date are controversial. The reasons for this controversy may reside in the heterogeneity of the patients studied and of the study designs. This review focuses on the need to correctly identify the different patterns of BMT to achieve reproducible and reliable data, which may in turn be used to devise precise guidelines for the use of specialized artificial nutrition in BMT patients.

Nutrient support in hematopoietic cell transplantation

High-dose cytoreduction and hematopoietic stem cell infusion form the basis for treatment of hematologic cancers, defects or failure of hematopoiesis, and some solid tumors. As an antitumor therapy, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is superior to autologous HCT by induction of a graft-vs-tumor effect. However, recipients of allografts suffer higher transplant-related mortality owing to graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Nutrition support research must recognize that HCT is a heterogeneous modality whose short and long-term outcomes are affected by transplant type, preparative regimens, diagnosis, disease stage, age, and nutritional status. The field of HCT will diversify further as lower dose cytoreduction and mixed chimerism grafts allow expansion of the technique to older patients and to other diseases.

Impact of a randomized, controlled trial of liberal vs conservative hospital discharge criteria on energy, protein, and fluid intake in patients who received marrow transplants

OBJECT

To determine if adult patients who received marrow transplants had faster resumption of oral energy and nutrient intake and shorter duration of intravenous (i.v.) fluid requirement if discharged from the hospital earlier than is customary.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial of patients remaining hospitalized because of inadequate oral intake. Consenting patients were assigned randomly to remain hospitalized (hospital group) or be discharged to an ambulatory setting (ambulatory group).

SUBJECTS

Seventy-eight patients of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center who were consuming less than 33% of estimated energy requirement and requiring up to 3,000 mL of fluids per day intravenously.

INTERVENTION

Participants received nutrition counseling by a registered dietitian to promote resumption of oral intake. Daily oral intake records were analyzed to determine energy and nutrient content.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Days after study enrollment to consume 33% of energy and protein requirements and total number of days of i.v. fluid support were analyzed by group until discharge from the center, approximately 100 days after transplantation.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Demographic data were defined by group means. Differences between treatment procedures were determined by Cox regression analysis. No variables were confounding.

RESULTS

The hospital group took fewer days than the ambulatory group to resume oral energy intake (4.5 vs 8.0, P = .004) and to discontinue i.v. fluids (30.5 vs 48.5, P = .019). There was no difference between groups in days of parenteral nutrition support (P = .817) or days to resume oral protein intake (P = .470).

APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Oral and gastrointestinal complications delay resumption of oral energy and protein intakes after transplantation. Earlier hospital discharge can achieve cost savings but may delay resumption of oral energy intake. Because of continued high-risk nutrition status and potential for rapid change in medical status, nutrition assessment and counseling are necessary in both the hospital and ambulatory setting to promote resumption of oral intake and discontinuation of i.v. fluids.

Branched-chain amino acids

The branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), isoleucine, leucine and valine, are unique in that they are principally metabolized extrahepatically in the skeletal muscle. This observation led to the investigation of these nutrients in a number of clinical scenarios. By far the most intensively studied applications for BCAA have been in patients with liver failure and/or patients in catabolic disease states. However, the resulting studies have not demonstrated a clear clinical benefit for BCAA nutritional supplements. In patients with liver failure, the BCAA did improve nitrogen retention and protein synthesis, but their effect on patient outcome was less clear. Similarly, in critically ill septic patients, BCAA did not improve either survival or morbidity. The BCAA are important nutrients, and it seems that any specific benefits associated with their use will be based upon a greater understanding of the underlying cellular biology. Potential areas of further research may include the combination of BCAA supplements with other anabolic factors (e.g. growth hormone) in managing patients with catabolic disease states.

Parenteral nutrition for marrow transplant recipients: evaluation of an increased nitrogen dose

The use of total parenteral nutrition in bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients is well recognized. These patients as a result of treatment with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive agents undergo catabolic stress. The metabolic effect of an increased nitrogen dose during total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was studied in 28 BMT patients. Patients were given TPN formulas providing a nitrogen intake of either 267 +/- 44 mg of N/kg/d or 330 +/- 60 mg of N/kg/d. Total calories, nonprotein and protein, were held constant at 40 kcal/kg/d for all patients. Data was collected for three periods posttransplant beginning at 3 days posttransplant through day 16. Both study TPN formulas improved patient weight and TIBC values over baseline. Nitrogen balance (NB) values were not significantly different at any study period. However, an overall group effect favored the H-N formula (p less than 0.01). BMT patients undergo catabolic stress which was reflected by average values of 24-hour urine urea nitrogen increasing from 8.1 +/- 4 g/d at baseline to 19.8 +/- 7.2 g/d at period 3 (p less than 0.01). The H-N formula did not differentially increase blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine levels. Metabolic cart measures also showed no increase in metabolic rate, oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, or percent contribution of protein to total metabolic expenditure. Providing a caloric intake of 40 kcal/kg/d was excessive, where 30 to 35 kcal/kg/d would meet metabolic demands. Pertinent clinical outcomes including length of stay, relapse rate, and survival were monitored, but no conclusions could be drawn in this study. The H-N formula was more effective in reducing loss of lean body mass without causing detrimental metabolic effects in BMT patients.

Failure of BCAA supplementation to promote nitrogen retention in injured patients

The purpose of this study was to determine if supplementing total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with lipids or the branched chain amino acids (BCAA) leucine, isoleucine, and valine influences nitrogen balance in the injured patient. Four TPN study solutions were used, with each patient receiving two of the solutions for 4 days each. Group A received solutions consisting of 19% and 44% BCAA, with nonnitrogen calories supplied by 100% carbohydrate. Group B received a 7:3 carbohydrate-to-lipid ratio of nonnitrogen calories as a fuel source. Neither BCAA supplementation nor varying fuel substrates promoted a difference in nitrogen retention. The added cost of BCAA supplementation, along with the lack of an effect upon nitrogen accretion, indicates that greater benefits must be demonstrated before widespread use of BCAA supplementation can be recommended in the injured patient.

Do parenteral nutrition solutions with high concentrations of branched-chain amino acids offer significant benefits to stressed patients?

The critically ill, stressed patient has been characterized as having altered cellular metabolism. Altered protein metabolism is manifested as negative nitrogen balance, reduced whole-body protein synthesis, and increased proteolysis. An increased oxidation of the branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) leucine, isoleucine, and valine has also been observed. Exogenous administration of BCAA as part of a total parenteral nutrition (TPN) regimen has been proposed to compensate for the altered protein metabolism in the stressed patient by sparing endogenous sources of BCAA, thereby reducing skeletal muscle catabolism and increasing protein synthesis. Numerous clinical studies have been performed investigating this theory. The results are controversial. Differences in study outcomes appear to be related to study design, especially patient selection. Our review of those studies which were randomized, prospective, and controlled indicates that an improvement in nitrogen retention and visceral protein status can be achieved in stress-stratified patients who receive a TPN regimen containing a BCAA-enriched formula. The significance of these outcomes on morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality has not been evaluated.

Branched-chain amino acid support of stressed patients

Branched-chain amino acid-enriched formulas have been evaluated in a number of clinical trials. The efficacy of these solutions in the management of stressed patients is controversial. This review discusses the proposed benefits of the branched-chain amino acid-fortified solutions and summarizes prospective clinical trials regarding their use in stressed patients. A cost comparison is also included.