Corticosteroid Use in Otolaryngology: Current Considerations During the COVID-19 Era

Decannulation ahead: a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic framework for tracheotomized neurological patients

BACKGROUND

Decannulation in tracheotomized neurological patients is often complicated by severe dysphagia, which compromises airway safety and delays weaning. Additional challenges, including reduced cough strength, excessive bronchial secretions, and altered airway anatomy exacerbate weaning issues, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes diagnostic procedures and therapeutic options crucial for the rehabilitation of tracheotomized patients.

MAIN BODY

Key diagnostic strategies for assessing decannulation readiness focus on airway protection, airway patency, bronchial secretion management, and cough function. These are collectively introduced as the A2BC criteria in this review. Advanced tools such as flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, endoscopic assessment of airway anatomy, measurement of cough strength, and intrathoracic pressure are essential components of a systematic evaluation. Therapeutic interventions encompass restoring physiological airflow, behavioral swallowing treatment, secretion management, and pharyngeal electrical stimulation. The proposed decannulation algorithm integrates two pathways: the "fast-track" pathway, which facilitates rapid decannulation based on relevant predictors of decannulation-success, and the "standard-track" pathway, which progressively increases cuff deflation intervals to build tolerance over time.

CONCLUSION

Successful decannulation in neurological patients demands a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach that combines advanced diagnostics, targeted therapies, and structured management pathways. The proposed algorithm integrates fast-track and standard-track pathways, balancing rapid diagnostics with gradual weaning strategies. This framework promotes flexibility, enabling clinicians to tailor interventions to individual patient needs while maintaining safety and optimizing outcomes.

Comparison of Batroxobin Versus the Combination of Batroxobin and Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection in the Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Introduction: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) manifests as an abrupt decline in hearing by at least 30 dB within a 3 day period. Intratympanic dexamethasone injection (ITDI) has gained recognition as a potential treatment for SSNHL. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of combining batroxobin with ITDI (Bat and ITDI) in treating SSNHL patients and its influence on peripheral blood inflammatory indicators. Methods: SSNHL patients were retrospectively categorized into the control group (treated with Bat) and the observation group (treated with Bat and ITDI). The study involved analyzing clinical baseline data, evaluating clinical efficacy, and comparing the total effective rates among SSNHL patients with different audiometric curve types in the observation group. Routine blood tests were performed on peripheral blood samples to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and to determine C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Adverse reactions and complications were closely monitored. Results: Following treatment, both groups displayed improvements in hearing, with the observation group exhibiting a significantly higher total effective rate (75.90%) than the control group (59.78%). For patients with 3 distinct types of sudden hearing loss (high-frequency, flat-frequency, total deafness), Bat and ITDI treatment demonstrated increased total effective rate for patients with different sudden hearing loss types (high-frequency, flat-frequency, and total deafness). Both groups experienced reduced peripheral blood CRP levels and the NLR/PLR values, with the observation group demonstrating lower values. Additionally, across the 4 audio metric subtypes, the levels of peripheral blood CRP, NLR, and PLR decreased in SSNHL patients, and the observation group had a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared to the control group. Conclusions: Bat and ITDI emerge as notably more effective for SSNHL patients, displaying potential for reducing peripheral blood inflammatory indicator levels and mitigating the incidence of adverse reactions or complications, thereby enhancing safety.

Sudden Hearing Loss Waves: The Effect of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination on the Inner Ear

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) has emerged as a potential complication of COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Various mechanisms by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus can cause hearing loss have been reported, including direct viral invasion, neuroinflammation, blood flow disturbances, and immune-mediated response. However, the temporal relationship between COVID-19 infection and SSNHL remains unclear, with mixed findings and conflicting results reported in different studies. Similarly, while anecdotal reports have linked COVID-19 vaccination to SSNHL, evidence remains scarce. Establishing a correlation between COVID-19 vaccines and SSNHL implies a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis involving interactions between the immune system and the body's stress response. Nevertheless, it is important to consider the overwhelming evidence of the vaccines' safety and efficacy in limiting the spread of the disease and remains the primordial tool in reducing death.

Characteristics of sudden hearing loss after different COVID-19 vaccinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 vaccines are essential to prevent complications and reduce the burden of SARS-CoV-2. However, these vaccines showed side effects such as fatigue, pain, fever, and rarely hearing loss. In this review, we aim to summarize studies investigating hearing loss following COVID-19 vaccination and try to find the possible association and risk factors for this hazardous complication.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, google scholar, Cochrane) from inception until 9 October 2022. We finally included 16 studies after the first and second scans. We used SPSS to analyze the extracted data.

RESULTS

A total of 630 patients were identified, with a mean age of 57.3. Of the patients, 328 out of 609 vaccinated patients took the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine, while 242 (40%) took the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. The mean time from vaccination to hearing impairment was 6.2, ranging from a few hours to one month after the last dose. The results found a significant difference between vaccine types in terms of incidence and prognosis of the condition, while they showed that the number of doses prior to the onset had no significance.

CONCLUSION

SNHL has been reported in a small number of people who have received the COVID-19 vaccine, but it is unclear at this time whether the vaccine is directly causing this condition. However, the COVID-19 vaccine has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in preventing illness, and the benefits of vaccination are significant compared to any potential risks.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The protocol of this study was registered on Prospero CRD42022367180.

Systemic Steroids for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Disorders: An Evidence-Based Primer for Clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To offer pragmatic, evidence-informed guidance on the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for common otolaryngologic disorders.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation clinical practice guidelines.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search of published literature through November 2021 was conducted on the efficacy of SCS, alone or in combination with other treatments, for managing disorders in otolaryngology and the subdisciplines. Clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials, when available, were preferentially retrieved. Interventions and outcomes of SCS use were compiled to generate summary tables and narrative synthesis of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on the effectiveness of SCS varies widely across otolaryngology disorders. High-level evidence supports SCS use for Bell's palsy, sinonasal polyposis, and lower airway disease. Conversely, evidence is weak or absent for upper respiratory tract infection, eustachian tube dysfunction, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, or nonallergic rhinitis. Evidence is indeterminate for acute laryngitis, acute pharyngitis, acute sinusitis, angioedema, chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps, Ménière's disease, postviral olfactory loss, postoperative nerve paresis/paralysis, facial pain, and sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians should bring an evidence-informed lens to SCS prescribing to best counsel patients regarding the risks, anticipated benefits, and limited data on long-term effects. Alternate routes of corticosteroid administration-such as sprays, drops, inhalers, and intralesional injections-may be preferable for many disorders, particularly those that are self-limited or require a prolonged duration of therapy. Prudent use of SCS reduces the risk of medication-related adverse effects. Clinicians who are conversant with high-level evidence can achieve optimal outcomes and stewardship when prescribing SCS.

Non-Dexamethasone Corticosteroid Therapy's Effect on COVID-19 Prognosis in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Anti-inflammatory corticosteroids are used in cancer treatment and COVID-19 infections. Data on the impact of non-dexamethasone corticosteroids on COVID-19 infection severity in cancer patients are minimal. This study investigates if corticosteroid treatment affects the disease severity in adult cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 116 COVID-19-infected cancer patients on hydrocortisone (H) or prednisone (P) were compared to 343 untreated patients. The study included patients who received corticosteroids before (B), after (A), or both before and after (B and A) COVID-19 infections. Ventilation support, hospitalization and mortality were investigated.

RESULTS

Our data showed that a significantly greater number of patients taking H or P required ventilation support and hospitalization and that mortality rates were higher than the control group. Patients who received H or P after COVID-19 infection had a significantly worse prognosis than the other sub-groups and the control group.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroids impacted cancer patients' COVID-19 prognosis. Despite the limited sample size, H- and P-treated patients' corticosteroids performed worse than the control, especially if treatments were received after COVID-19 infection. Hence, when a cancer patient already on H or P treatment is diagnosed with COVID-19, we recommend switching to a steroid treatment as suggested by international guidelines.

Cricotracheostomy for patients with severe COVID-19: A case control study

Background

Tracheostomy is an important procedure for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Older age and obesity have been reported to be associated with the risk of severe COVID-19 and prolonged intubation, and anticoagulants are often administered in patients with severe COVID-19; these factors are also related to a higher risk of tracheostomy. Cricotracheostomy, a modified procedure for opening the airway through intentional partial cricoid cartilage resection, was recently reported to be useful in cases with low-lying larynx, obesity, stiff neck, and bleeding tendency. Here, we investigated the usefulness and safety of cricotracheostomy for severe COVID-19 patients.

Materials and methods

Fifteen patients with severe COVID-19 who underwent cricotracheostomy between January 2021 and April 2022 with a follow-up period of ≥ 14 days were included in this study. Forty patients with respiratory failure not related to COVID-19 who underwent traditional tracheostomy between January 2015 and April 2022 comprised the control group. Data were collected from medical records and comprised age, sex, body mass index, interval from intubation to tracheostomy, use of anticoagulants, complications of tracheostomy, and decannulation.

Results

Age, sex, and days from intubation to tracheostomy were not significantly different between the COVID-19/cricotracheostomy and control/traditional tracheostomy groups. Body mass index was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group than that in the control group (P = 0.02). The rate of use of anticoagulants was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). Peri-operative bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, and stomal infection rates were not different between the groups, while stomal granulation was significantly less in the COVID-19 group (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

These results suggest that cricotracheostomy is a safe procedure in patients with severe COVID-19.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss after Third Dose Booster of COVID-19 Vaccine Administration

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic due to its rapid spread worldwide, and its vaccination campaign is considered one of the most historic public hygiene measures in modern medicine. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a common emergency that affects patient’s quality of life and requires rapid treatment with steroids. The etiology could be viral or vascular even though in most cases it remains unknown (idiopathic SSHL). During the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, several rare but serious adverse events have been reported including thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, myocarditis, and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. ENT adverse events after vaccination were reported too, including cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), vestibular neuronitis and audio vestibular disorders (such as tinnitus, dizziness, and vertigo). For the first time here, we reported two cases of SSHL after third administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Even if there is not clear evidence of an association between SSHL and vaccination, adverse effects should be kept in mind since viral infection could be the etiology of SSHL.

Acute Unilateral Peripheral Vestibulopathy After COVID-19 Vaccination: Initial Experience in a Tertiary Neurotology Center

Objective

The aim of the present study was to identify patients who developed acute unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy (AUPVP) after COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods

For this single-center, retrospective study, we screened the medical records of our tertiary interdisciplinary neurotology center for patients who had presented with AUPVP within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccination (study period: 1 June−31 December 2021). The initial diagnosis of AUPVP was based on a comprehensive bedside neurotological examination. Laboratory vestibular testing (video head impulse test, cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, dynamic visual acuity, subjective visual vertical, video-oculography, caloric testing) was performed 1–5 months later.

Results

Twenty-six patients were diagnosed with AUPVP within the study period. Of those, n = 8 (31%) had developed acute vestibular symptoms within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccination (mean interval: 11.9 days, SD: 4.8, range: 6–20) and were thus included in the study. The mean age of the patients (two females, six males) was 46 years (SD: 11.7). Seven patients had received the Moderna mRNA vaccine and one the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine. All patients displayed a horizontal(-torsional) spontaneous nystagmus toward the unaffected ear and a pathological clinical head impulse test toward the affected ear on initial clinical examination. Receptor-specific laboratory vestibular testing performed 1–5 months later revealed recovery of vestibular function in two patients, and heterogeneous lesion patterns of vestibular endorgans in the remaining six patients.

Discussion and Conclusions

The present study should raise clinicians' awareness for AUPVP after COVID-19 vaccination. The relatively high fraction of such cases among our AUPVP patients may be due to a certain selection bias at a tertiary neurotology center. Patients presenting with acute vestibular symptoms should be questioned about their vaccination status and the date of the last vaccination dose. Furthermore, cases of AUPVP occurring shortly after a COVID-19 vaccination should be reported to the health authorities to help determining a possible causal relationship.

Four cases of audio-vestibular disorders related to immunisation with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines

OBJECTIVE

To gain medical insight into the clinical course and safety of otolaryngologic disorders following immunisation with severe acute respiratory coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA-based vaccines.

DESIGN

Case description.

STUDY SAMPLE

We report four cases of transient audio-vestibular symptoms, which occurred shortly after inoculation of two BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech^®) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna®) vaccines.

RESULTS

Hearing loss was unilateral in all cases and recovered at least partially: it was associated with persistent gait instability in two cases, after 1 and 7 months. Trigger mechanisms underpinning audio-vestibular impairment remain uncertain. Immune tolerance mechanisms with off-target innate activation of T-lymphocytes may be involved in vestibulocochlear nerve disorders, as for other cranial nerves involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of audio-vestibular manifestations following mRNA-based vaccines needs ENT monitoring to support their causality in such rare vaccine-related adverse events. Audio-vestibular disorders appeared of transitory nature, including hearing loss, and should not deter further efforts in large-scale vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2.