1
|
Punnett G, Eastwood C, Green L, Yorke J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of decision making interventions on increasing perceptions of shared decision making occurring in advanced cancer consultations. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 123:108235. [PMID: 38492428 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine how decision making interventions for use in advanced cancer treatment consultations function and whether they increase perceptions of shared decision making (SDM) behaviours within consultations. METHODS A systematic search of five literature databases was conducted. Evaluations of decision making interventions where participants faced active treatment decisions for stage 4 or otherwise incurable cancer were included. Intervention descriptions were coded using Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) to provide a narrative of how the interventions function. A narrative synthesis of interventions effect on perceptions of SDM behaviours compared to usual care was conducted. RESULTS Four studies presenting different interventions were included. Education, training, modelling and enablement intervention functions were identified. Oncologist SDM training alone and combined with a patient communication aid demonstrated the only significant effect (p < 0.05) on SDM behaviours in advanced cancer consultations. CONCLUSION Healthcare professional (HCP) SDM training which includes modelling and enablement functions may be effective in increasing clinician motivation, capability and opportunity to facilitate SDM in advanced cancer consultations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Implementing HCP SDM training into practice may encourage greater uptake of SDM which may lead to treatment decisions concordant with the goals of care of people with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Punnett
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester, UK.
| | - Charlotte Eastwood
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Laura Green
- University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester, UK
| | - Janelle Yorke
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edwards M, Holland‐Hart D, Mann M, Seddon K, Buckle P, Longo M, Byrne A, Nelson A. Understanding how shared decision-making approaches and patient aids influence patients with advanced cancer when deciding on palliative treatments and care: A realist review. Health Expect 2023; 26:2109-2126. [PMID: 37448166 PMCID: PMC10632651 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced incurable cancer face difficult decisions about palliative treatment options towards their end of life. However, they are often not provided with the appropriate information and support that is needed to make informed decisions. This review aimed to identify contexts and mechanisms associated with communication tools, patient decision-aids and shared decision-making (SDM) approaches that influence patient outcomes. METHODS We used a realist review method to search for published studies of patients (adults > 18) with advanced cancer who were expected to make a decision about palliative treatment and/or supportive care in consultation with healthcare practitioners. We appraised and synthesised literature describing the contexts of (when and how) decision aids and SDM approaches are used, and how these contexts interact with mechanisms (resources and reasoning) which impact patient outcomes. Stakeholders including academics, palliative healthcare professionals (HCPs) and people with lived experience of supporting people with advanced incurable cancer contributed to identifying explanatory accounts. These accounts were documented, analysed and consolidated to contribute to the development of a programme theory. RESULTS From the 33 included papers, we consolidated findings into 20 explanatory accounts to develop a programme theory that explains key contexts and mechanisms that influence patient and SDM. Contexts include underlying patients' and HCPs' attitudes and approaches. These need to be understood in relation to key mechanisms, including presenting information in multiple formats and providing adequate time and opportunities to prepare for and revisit decisions. Contexts influenced mechanisms which then influence the levels of patient decisional satisfaction, conflict and regret. CONCLUSIONS Our programme theory highlights mechanisms that are important in supporting shared treatment decisions for advanced noncurative cancer. The findings are informative for developing and evaluating interventions to improve understanding and involvement in SDM for patients with advanced incurable cancer. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION We included patient and public involvement (PPI) representatives in four stakeholder meetings. PPI helped to define the scope of the review, identify their unique experiences and perspectives, synthesise their perspectives with our review findings, make decisions about which theories we included in our programme theory and develop recommendations for policy and practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreCardiff UniversityCardiffWalesUK
| | - Daniella Holland‐Hart
- Division of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreCardiff UniversityCardiffWalesUK
| | - Mala Mann
- Division of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreCardiff UniversityCardiffWalesUK
| | - Kathy Seddon
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreWales Cancer Research CentreCardiffWalesUK
| | - Peter Buckle
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreWales Cancer Research CentreCardiffWalesUK
| | - Mirella Longo
- Division of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreCardiff UniversityCardiffWalesUK
| | - Anthony Byrne
- Division of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreCardiff UniversityCardiffWalesUK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Division of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research CentreCardiff UniversityCardiffWalesUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kengne Talla P, Inquimbert C, Dawson A, Zidarov D, Bergeron F, Chandad F. Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Teledentistry From the Perspective of Dental Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Review. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e44218. [PMID: 37494093 PMCID: PMC10413248 DOI: 10.2196/44218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing literature on the potential of digital technologies for improving access to, ensuring continuity and quality of health care, and to strengthen health systems. Some studies have reported the cost-effectiveness of teledentistry, its reliability for remote dental screening, diagnosis, consultation, and treatment planning. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that teledentistry implementation faces many challenges and is not yet adopted by dental health care providers (DHCPs). Developing strategies to improve teledentistry adoption requires an understanding of the factors that promote or hinder its successful implementation. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to identify and synthetize barriers and enablers to implementing teledentistry as perceived by DHCPs in their clinical practices, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capacity, Opportunity, and Motivation Behavior (COM-B) model. METHODS This protocol follows the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Protocols) checklist. Literature will be searched in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO. We will perform additional searches on Google, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, screen the references of the included studies to capture additional relevant studies, and contact the authors of studies if we need more details. We will consider studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. There will be no restrictions on the publication date and dental setting. We will include studies published in French, English, and Portuguese. Two independent reviewers will select the study, extract data, and assess methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool's checklist. Data analysis will include a descriptive and a thematic content analysis. We will synthetize and categorize the barriers and enablers using the TDF and COM-B model and present a narrative synthesis of our results using tables, figures, and quotes. RESULTS By March 2023, the literature search has retrieved 7355 publications. We will identify the range of barriers and enablers to implementing teledentistry through DHCPs' perspectives. Considering the critical need for theory-based implementation interventions to improve the use of evidence-informed practices, we will synthesize the factors influencing the adoption of teledentistry based on the TDF domains and the 3 essential conditions predicting behavior change in accordance with the COM-B model. As needed, we will include additional determinants if not included in the TDF. We will conduct some subgroups analyses if studies are sufficient. We expect to complete the review by July 2024. CONCLUSIONS This review will provide some insights on the determinants of teledentistry implementation as perceived by DHCPs in dental settings. These findings will cater to patients, families, DHCPs, researchers, academic and professional decision-makers, and policy makers. The results of the systematic review could be used to develop theory-led interventions in improving teledentistry implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021293376; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=293376. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/44218.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascaline Kengne Talla
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Camille Inquimbert
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Aimée Dawson
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Diana Zidarov
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Centre Intégré Universitaire de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Centre Sud-de-l'île-de Montréal, Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Frédéric Bergeron
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Fatiha Chandad
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bisht J, Rawat P, Sehar U, Reddy PH. Caregivers with Cancer Patients: Focus on Hispanics. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:626. [PMID: 36765585 PMCID: PMC9913516 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a public health concern and causes more than 8 million deaths annually. Cancer triggers include population growth, aging, and variations in the prevalence and distribution of the critical risk factors for cancer. Multiple hallmarks are involved in cancer, including cell proliferation, evading growth suppressors, activating invasion and metastasis, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, reprogramming energy metabolism, and evading immune destruction. Both cancer and dementia are age-related and potentially lethal, impacting survival. With increasing aging populations, cancer and dementia cause a burden on patients, family members, the health care system, and informal/formal caregivers. In the current article, we highlight cancer prevalence with a focus on different ethnic groups, ages, and genders. Our article covers risk factors and genetic causes associated with cancer and types of cancers and comorbidities. We extensively cover the impact of cancer in Hispanics in comparison to that in other ethnic groups. We also discuss the status of caregivers with cancer patients and urgent needs from the state and federal support for caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasbir Bisht
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
| | - Priyanka Rawat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
| | - Ujala Sehar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
| | - P. Hemachandra Reddy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, School Health Professions, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
- Department of Public Health, School of Population and Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
- Neurology, Departments of School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA
- Nutritional Sciences Department, College of Human Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cincidda C, Pizzoli SFM, Ongaro G, Oliveri S, Pravettoni G. Caregiving and Shared Decision Making in Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:803-823. [PMID: 36661710 PMCID: PMC9857468 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A cancer diagnosis can impact patients' and caregivers' lives, posing different challenging situations. In particular, breast cancer and prostate cancer are two types of cancer involving families and especially spouses in challenges linked with the diagnosis and treatment process. Caregivers are usually involved in the treatment decision-making (TDM) process concerning patients' clinical pathway, cancer treatment, and ongoing therapies. To date, no contributions provide an exhaustive overview of the role of caregivers in cancer care and their involvement in the TDM process related to the therapies. METHODS We performed a systematic review of caregiver and patients experiences and perceptions of caregiver involvement in cancer TDM. Articles were searched on Public/Publisher MEDLINE (PubMed), Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), and American Psychological Association APA PsycINFO. RESULTS 17 studies were included, 10 on prostate cancer and 7 on breast cancer. According to the reviewed studies, patients and caregivers experienced the cancer diagnosis with a sense of unity. Most patients preferred to have an active or collaborative role with caregivers in TDM, feeling it was important to consult or share the decision made with their caregivers. Caregivers preferred to collaborate with patients or let patients decide by themselves after considering their opinions. Caregiver involvement could have a positive influence on the patient's medical decisions, even if cancer diagnosis and treatments overwhelmed patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the importance of using a perspective that focuses on the relationship between a patient and caregivers when they receive a cancer diagnosis and have to make a treatment decision. Targeting caregiver-patient dyads, rather than individuals, is important since a supported relationship could have a protective effect on psychological distress, quality of life (QOL), and relationship satisfaction. Moreover, dyads may benefit from interventions that focus on the needs of both the patient and caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clizia Cincidda
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Ongaro
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tibell LH, Alvariza A, Kreicbergs U, Wallin V, Steineck G, Holm M. Web-based support for spouses of patients with life-threatening illness cared for in specialized home care - A feasibility study. Palliat Support Care 2022:1-9. [PMID: 36537025 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951522001602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Psychoeducational interventions for family caregivers have shown to be effective but not possible for all caregivers to attend; thus, web-based interventions may be a complement. This study aimed to evaluate feasibility of a web-based intervention, "narstaende.se," from the perspective of spouses of patients receiving specialized home care. METHODS A website was developed, containing videos with conversations between health-care professionals and family caregivers (actors), informative texts, links to further information, and a chat forum. The aim of the website is to provide support and promote preparedness for caregiving and death, and the content is theoretically and empirically grounded. The study had a descriptive cross-sectional design. Altogether, 26 spouses answered a questionnaire, before accessing the website, and 4 weeks after this, 12 spouses were interviewed. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used. RESULTS Spouses experienced the website as being easy to use, welcoming, and with relevant content. Participating spouses would recommend "narstaende.se" to others in similar situations, and the majority found the website introduced timely. Videos seemed easily accessible and were most used, contributing to a feeling of recognition and sharing the situation. The online format was perceived as flexible, but still not all spouses visited the website, stating the desire for support in real life. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS A web-based intervention can be feasible for spouses in specialized home care; however, the digital format is not suitable for everyone. Further research is needed to determine the website's potential to provide support and increase preparedness for family caregivers in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Häger Tibell
- The Department of Health Care Science/Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Cancer, BES: Breast-Endocrine Tumours and Sarcoma, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anette Alvariza
- The Department of Health Care Science/Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholms Sjukhem, Research and Development Unit/Palliative Care, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Kreicbergs
- The Department of Health Care Science/Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Viktoria Wallin
- The Department of Health Care Science/Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Steineck
- Department of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maja Holm
- The Department of Health Care Science/Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coumoundouros C, Mårtensson E, Ferraris G, Zuidberg JM, von Essen L, Sanderman R, Woodford J. Implementation of e-Mental Health Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Diseases: Mixed Methods Systematic Review With a Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Thematic Synthesis. JMIR Ment Health 2022; 9:e41891. [PMID: 36314782 PMCID: PMC9752475 DOI: 10.2196/41891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informal caregivers commonly experience mental health difficulties related to their caregiving role. e-Mental health interventions provide mental health support in a format that may be more accessible to informal caregivers. However, e-mental health interventions are seldom implemented in real-world practice. OBJECTIVE This mixed methods systematic review aimed to examine factors associated with the effectiveness and implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with chronic diseases. To achieve this aim, two approaches were adopted: combinations of implementation and intervention characteristics sufficient for intervention effectiveness were explored using qualitative comparative analysis, and barriers to and facilitators of implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers were explored using thematic synthesis. METHODS We identified relevant studies published from January 1, 2007, to July 6, 2022, by systematically searching 6 electronic databases and various secondary search strategies. Included studies reported on the effectiveness or implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, diabetes, heart disease, or stroke. Randomized controlled trials reporting on caregivers' mental health outcomes were included in a crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis. We assessed randomized controlled trials for bias using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and we assessed how pragmatic or explanatory their trial design was using the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 tool. Studies of any design reporting on implementation were included in a thematic synthesis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers to and facilitators of implementation. RESULTS Overall, 53 reports, representing 29 interventions, were included in the review. Most interventions (27/29, 93%) focused on informal cancer or dementia caregivers. In total, 14 reports were included in the qualitative comparative analysis, exploring conditions including the presence of peer or professional support and key persuasive design features. Low consistency and coverage prevented the determination of condition sets sufficient for intervention effectiveness. Overall, 44 reports were included in the thematic synthesis, and 152 barriers and facilitators were identified, with the majority related to the intervention and individual characteristic domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation barriers and facilitators in the inner setting (eg, organizational culture) and outer setting (eg, external policies and resources) domains were largely unexplored. CONCLUSIONS e-Mental health interventions for informal caregivers tend to be well-designed, with several barriers to and facilitators of implementation identified related to the intervention and individual user characteristics. Future work should focus on exploring the views of stakeholders involved in implementation to determine barriers to and facilitators of implementing e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers, focusing on inner and outer setting barriers and facilitators. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42020155727; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020155727. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Coumoundouros
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Erika Mårtensson
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Giulia Ferraris
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Louise von Essen
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Joanne Woodford
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cincidda C, Oliveri S, Sanchini V, Pravettoni G. The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol. Front Psychol 2022; 13:962634. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCaregivers may play a fundamental role in the clinical pathway of cancer patients. They provide emotional, informational, and functional support as well as practical assistance, and they might help mediate the interaction and communication with the oncologists when care options are discussed, or decisions are made. Little is known about the impact of dyadic dynamics on patient-doctor communication, patient's satisfaction, or adherence to the therapies. This study protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy of a psychological support intervention on patients-caregivers relationship and their alignment in the treatment decision-making (TDM) process and estimate related improvement in patient' compliance/adherence to treatments.MethodsA total of 102 patients-caregivers' dyads will be involved, among breast and prostate cancer patients. The study entails a pre- post- evaluation through psychological questionnaires, with a randomization of participants in two conditions, the experimental one in which subjects participate in a psychological support consultation, and the control one, where dyads do not receive any intervention. A follow up after 6 months from the enrollment is planned.DiscussionA positive impact of the psychological support intervention on patients' anxiety, depression, distress, and perceived social support is expected. Such improvements can directly affect patients' satisfaction and adherence to treatments. Data gathered from this study may inform health care providers, policy makers, and public health managers about the importance of caregiver's involvement in the cancer care pathway, and the best way to manage it. A further impact is to develop a specific intervention protocol to support caregivers' involvement in cancer care pathway, improve patient's wellbeing, the interaction with physicians and the compliance with the cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Mondhiry J, D'Ambruoso S, Pietras C, Strouse T, Benzeevi D, Arevian AC, Wells KB. Co-created Mobile Apps for Palliative Care Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e33849. [PMID: 35737441 PMCID: PMC9264134 DOI: 10.2196/33849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Open design formats for mobile apps help clinicians and stakeholders bring their needs to direct, co-creative solutions. Palliative care for patients with advanced cancers requires intensive monitoring and support and remains an area in high need for innovation. Objective This study aims to use community-partnered participatory research to co-design and pretest a mobile app that focuses on palliative care priorities of clinicians and patients with advanced cancer. Methods In-person and teleconference workshops were held with patient and family stakeholders, researchers, and clinicians in palliative care and oncology. Question prompts, written feedback, semistructured interviews, and facilitated group discussions identified the core palliative care needs. Using Chorus, a no-code app-building platform, a mobile app was co-designed with the stakeholders. A pretest with 11 patients was conducted, with semistructured interviews of clinician and patient users for feedback. Results Key themes identified from the focus groups included needs for patient advocacy and encouragement, access to vetted information, patient-clinician communication support, and symptom management. The initial prototype, My Wellness App, contained a weekly wellness journal to track patient-reported symptoms, goals, and medication use; information on self-management of symptoms; community resources; and patient and caregiver testimonial videos. Initial pretesting identified value in app-based communication for clinicians, patients, and caregivers, with suggestions for improving user interface, feedback and presentation of symptom reports, and gamification and staff coordinators to support patient app engagement. Conclusions The development of a mobile app using community-partnered participatory research is a low-technology and feasible intervention for palliative care. Iterative redesign and user interface expertise may improve implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jafar Al-Mondhiry
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sarah D'Ambruoso
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Christopher Pietras
- Palliative Care Program, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Thomas Strouse
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dikla Benzeevi
- UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Kenneth B Wells
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Su Z, Li X, McDonnell D, Fernandez AA, Flores BE, Wang J. Technology-Based Interventions for Cancer Caregivers: Concept Analysis. JMIR Cancer 2021; 7:e22140. [PMID: 34783664 PMCID: PMC8663574 DOI: 10.2196/22140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is a taxing chronic disease that demands substantial care, most of which is shouldered by informal caregivers. As a result, cancer caregivers often have to manage considerable challenges that could result in severe physical and psychological health consequences. Technology-based interventions have the potential to address many, if not all, of the obstacles caregivers encounter while caring for patients with cancer. However, although the application of technology-based interventions is on the rise, the term is seldom defined in research or practice. Considering that the lack of conceptual clarity of the term could compromise the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for cancer caregivers, timely research is needed to bridge this gap. Objective This study aims to clarify the meaning of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving and provide a definition that can be used by cancer caregivers, patients, clinicians, and researchers to facilitate evidence-based research and practice. Methods The 8-step concept analysis method by Walker and Avant was used to analyze the concept of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving. PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies that examined technology-based interventions for cancer caregivers. Results The defining attributes of technology-based interventions were recognized as being accessible, affordable, convenient, and user-friendly. On the basis of insights gained on the defining attributes, antecedents to, and consequences of technology-based interventions through the concept analysis process, technology-based interventions were defined as the use of technology to design, develop, and deliver health promotion contents and strategies aimed at inducing or improving positive physical or psychological health outcomes in cancer caregivers. Conclusions This study clarified the meaning of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving and provided a clear definition that can be used by caregivers, patients, clinicians, and researchers to facilitate evidence-based oncology practice. A clear conceptualization of technology-based interventions lays foundations for better intervention design and research outcomes, which in turn have the potential to help health care professionals address the needs and preferences of cancer caregivers more cost-effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Su
- Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Xiaoshan Li
- Program of Public Relations and Advertising, Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, Zhuhai, China
| | - Dean McDonnell
- Department of Humanities, Institute of Technology, Carlow, Ireland
| | - Andrea A Fernandez
- School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Bertha E Flores
- School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jing Wang
- Florida State University College of Nursing, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Engaging Patients with Late-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Shared Decision Making about Treatment. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11100998. [PMID: 34683140 PMCID: PMC8539978 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11100998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Few treatment decision support interventions (DSIs) are available to engage patients diagnosed with late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in treatment shared decision making (SDM). We designed a novel DSI that includes care plan cards and a companion patient preference clarification tool to assist in shared decision making. The cards answer common patient questions about treatment options (chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, clinical trial participation, and supportive care). The form elicits patient treatment preference. We then conducted interviews with clinicians and patients to obtain feedback on the DSI. We also trained oncology nurse educators to implement the prototype. Finally, we pilot tested the DSI among five patients with NSCLC at the beginning of an office visit scheduled to discuss treatment with an oncologist. Analyses of pilot study baseline and exit survey data showed that DSI use was associated with increased patient awareness of the alternatives' treatment options and benefits/risks. In contrast, patient concern about treatment costs and uncertainty in treatment decision making decreased. All patients expressed a treatment preference. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to assess DSI implementation feasibility and efficacy in clinical care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kozlov E, McDarby M, Duberstein P, Carpenter BD. The Feasibility and Acceptability of an Intergenerational, Web-Based Intervention to Enhance Later-Life Family Care Planning. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2021; 61:1153-1163. [PMID: 32946554 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Adult children collaborate with older parents on care needs, yet later-life families are often uncertain about how to approach these conversations. Using the McMaster Model of Family Functioning as a framework, we developed a web-based tool for later-life families to enhance communication, knowledge, and problem solving around parent preferences for care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Participants were older adult parents aged 65+ and at least one of their adult children. Families answered questions about the parent's care preferences via a web-based survey. Responses were aggregated in a tailored PDF that was distributed to each participant. Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine recruitment, retention, and satisfaction with the program. Repeated measures analyses of variance were calculated to determine preliminary efficacy of the intervention. RESULTS This study included 142 participants across 49 families (n = 49 older adult parents, n = 93 adult children). Of them, 75.4% completed all three phases of the study while 18.3% completed two phases and 6.3% completed only one phase. Seventy-four percent of participants reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention. At baseline, most families were modestly incongruent in their ratings of future care preferences. Participants reported increased conversations about care across the course of the study (F(1.71,179.32) = 42.18, p < .001). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS This study demonstrated that a web-based intervention to enhance intergenerational communication is feasible, acceptable, and has preliminary efficacy to improve intergenerational communication. Despite recruitment challenges, similarly designed web-based resources may improve accessibility and scalability of intergenerational communication-enhancing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa Kozlov
- Institute for Health, Health Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Meghan McDarby
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul Duberstein
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Brian D Carpenter
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moore C, Hassett D, Dunne S. Health literacy in cancer caregivers: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 15:825-836. [PMID: 33409857 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00975-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer caregivers play a vital role in the care and health decision-making of cancer survivors. Consequently, their health literacy levels may be particularly important, as low levels may impede adequate care provision. As such, the current review aimed to systematically examine the literature on health literacy amongst cancer caregivers. METHODS We systematically searched the following databases using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms: PsychINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Peer-reviewed empirical studies that explicitly measured and reported cancer caregiver health literacy levels were included. RESULTS The search yielded six articles consisting of 593 cancer caregivers exploring health literacy and eHealth literacy. There was substantial variation in health literacy measurement tools used across included studies, precluding the possibility of conducting a meta-analysis. The included articles reported significant associations (limited to single studies) between caregiver health/eHealth literacy and (i) cancer survivor demographics, (ii) caregivers' communication style, (iii) caregiver Internet access and (iv) caregiver coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight a need for future longitudinal research regarding cancer caregiver health literacy incorporating more standardized and population-specific measurement approaches. In particular, there is a pressing need to investigate factors associated with cancer caregiver health literacy to inform the development/delivery of future interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Future high-quality research which investigates the factors which contribute towards sub-optimal health literacy amongst cancer caregivers would aid in the development of appropriate and effective health literacy interventions in these groups. Such interventions would allow this important group to provide appropriate support to cancer survivors and enhance survivors' engagement in their health and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Moore
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Simon Dunne
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital technologies provide a platform for accelerating science and broadening impact in behavioral medicine. PURPOSE The objective of this invited keynote presentation or paper is to offer a blueprint for navigating the rapidly changing waters of digital health. METHODS A strategic literature review on digital health technologies in behavioral medicine was combined with a review of relevant policy initiatives to yield insights on: (a) knowledge building, (b) collaboration, and (c) public health stewardship. RESULTS Digital platforms offer unprecedented leverage for accelerating science, facilitating collaboration, and advancing public health. Early successes in behavioral medicine demonstrated how digital platforms could extend the reach of theory-based behavioral therapeutics through increases in efficiency and scale. As medical investments in health information technology increased, the field of behavioral informatics emerged as the collaborative glue binding behavioral theory into a new generation of patient-facing applications, clinical decision support tools, evidence-based communication programs, and population health management strategies. As a leader within the interstitial space between medicine, psychology, and engineering, the Society of Behavioral Medicine is in a distinct position to exert influence on the ways in which our science is utilized to eliminate health disparities; improve support for patients, caregivers, and communities; to promote general health and well-being; and to offer relief when confronted with psychological pain or addiction. CONCLUSION Riding the wave of digital transformation has less to do with mastering the complexities of the latest technologies and more to do with adhering closely to established principles for navigating a rapidly changing information environment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kasturi S, Wong JB, Mandl LA, McAlindon TE, LeClair A. "Unspoken Questions": A Qualitative Study of Rheumatologists' Perspectives on the Clinical Implementation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures. J Rheumatol 2020; 47:1822-1830. [PMID: 32611667 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify rheumatologists' views on perceived barriers and facilitators to the clinical implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with academically affiliated clinical rheumatologists. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Deidentified transcripts were independently coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS Fifteen attending rheumatologists, 8 women (53%) and 7 men (47%) with a mean of 17.3 years in practice (range 5-43) at 2 urban academic medical centers, participated in interviews. Rheumatologists identified several barriers to integrating PROM in clinical care, highlighting physician buy-in and culture change as significant challenges beyond logistical considerations. They further underscored the lack of effective interventions and resources for addressing the domains of most interest to patients. Physicians also recognized significant benefits of PROM in clinical care, including contributing to the clinical impression by providing the patient perspective, and promoting agenda setting by uncovering "unspoken questions." They additionally noted that PROM could support treatment planning, build patient-physician relationships, and facilitate patient engagement. Participants suggested that technology, physician education, and team-based care could facilitate the effective implementation of PROM. CONCLUSION Rheumatologists identified multiple mechanisms through which PROM could augment clinical care, but also noted several obstacles to implementation, questioning the added value of PROM and the limited availability of interventions to improve patient-centered outcomes. Programs seeking to successfully integrate PROM to enhance patient-centered care and meet quality benchmarks should prioritize physician buy-in and training, and provide resources to address the outcomes that are measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanthini Kasturi
- S. Kasturi, MD, MS, T.E. McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
| | - John B Wong
- J.B. Wong, MD, Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- L.A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Timothy E McAlindon
- S. Kasturi, MD, MS, T.E. McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy LeClair
- A.LeClair, PhD, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gustafson DH, Gustafson DH, Cody OJ, Chih MY, Johnston DC, Asthana S. Pilot Test of a Computer-Based System to Help Family Caregivers of Dementia Patients. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 70:541-552. [PMID: 31256126 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family members absorb much of the care of dementia patients. The burden of care substantially impacts caregivers' health, further straining our healthcare system. By 2050, the incidence of Alzheimer's disease will more than double, increasing the numbers of family caregivers proportionally. Interventions that reduce their burden are needed to preserve their health as well as the viability of the healthcare system. OBJECTIVE This paper reports on the development and feasibility testing of a computer-based system intended to improve the lives of caregivers. D-CHESS (Dementia-Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System) allows users to obtain information, communicate with other caregivers, get help with care decisions, and share information with experts. METHOD Thirty-one caregivers were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving D-CHESS for 6 months or to a control group receiving a caregiving book. Surveys at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months evaluated caregiver burden, family conflict, satisfaction with decisions, social support, loneliness, anxiety, depression, and coping competence. RESULTS Survey findings suggest D-CHESS participants may perform better on measures of social support, anxiety, loneliness, and coping competence; the groups were equivalent on caregiver burden, decision satisfaction, and depression, and the control group reported less family conflict than the intervention. D-CHESS use data suggested enhancements to system design and content to increase awareness and use of various features. CONCLUSION This study suggests that D-CHESS has potential to positively impact family caregivers and that the system merits further development and investigation with a full-scale clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Olivia J Cody
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ming-Yuan Chih
- College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Darcie C Johnston
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sanjay Asthana
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (SMPH), Madison, WI, USA.,Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, SMPH, Madison, WI, USA.,Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Crotty BH, Asan O, Holt J, Tyszka J, Erickson J, Stolley M, Pezzin LE, Nattinger AB. Qualitative Assessment of Unmet Information Management Needs of Informal Cancer Caregivers: Four Themes to Inform Oncology Practice. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 4:521-528. [PMID: 32530708 DOI: 10.1200/cci.19.00159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Family and friends often provide informal care for patients with cancer, coordinating care and supporting patients at home. Stress, depression, and burnout are increasingly recognized among these informal caregivers. Although past research has described a range of needs, including the need for information, details about unmet informational needs for caregivers have not been fully described. We sought to assess unmet information management needs for informal caregivers in the digital era. METHODS This was a qualitative research study with semistructured interviews and focus groups of nonprofessional caregivers for patients with cancer, facilitated using a discussion guide. Eligible caregivers supported patients in the community who were in treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) or completed treatment within 3 years. Participants were recruited using informational flyers at an academic cancer center and in the local community of metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Sessions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively to identify themes. RESULTS Thirteen caregivers participated, the majority between 41 and 60 years of age: seven of 13, 53.8%, were predominantly women; 10 of 13 (76.9%) were educated, 10 of 13 (76.9%) had graduated from college; and of modest means, six of 13 (46.2%) had household incomes < $35,000. Four themes emerged: (1) the information overload paradox, where caregivers felt overloaded by information yet had unmet informational needs; (2) navigating volatility as a caregiver, with changing or unknown expectations; (3) caregivers as information brokers, which placed new burdens on caregivers to seek, share, and protect information; and (4) care for the caregiver, including unmet information needs related to self-care. CONCLUSION This study identified several informational challenges affecting caregivers. Caregivers have dynamic and evolving informational needs, and strategies that support caregivers through just-in-time information availability or dedicated caregiver check-ins may provide relief within the stress of caregiving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Onur Asan
- Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
| | - Jeana Holt
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Slevin P, Kessie T, Cullen J, Butler MW, Donnelly SC, Caulfield B. Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM 2020; 113:163-172. [PMID: 31545374 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health technology (DHT) promises to support patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to optimize the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is a lack of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of DHT for the management of COPD. One reason for this is the lack of user-involvement in the development of DHT interventions in COPD meaning their needs and preferences are rarely accounted for in the design phase. Although HCP adoption issues have been identified in relation to DHT, little is known about the challenges perceived by HCPs providing care to COPD patients. Therefore, this study aims to qualitatively explore the barriers and facilitators HCPs perceive for the use of DHT in the management of COPD. METHODS Participants (n = 32) were recruited using snowball sampling from two university hospitals and several general practitioner clinics. A semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant. NVivo 12 software was used to complete thematic analysis on the data. RESULTS Themes identified include: data quality; evidence-based care; resource constraints; and digital literacy presented as barriers; and facilitators include the following themes: digital health training and education; improving HCP digital literacy; and Personalized prescribing. Patient-centered approaches, such as pulmonary rehabilitation and shared decision-making were suggested as implementation strategies to ease the adoption of digital health for the management of COPD. CONCLUSION These findings contribute new insights about the needs and preferences of HCPs working in COPD regarding DHT. The findings can be used to help mitigate user-experience issues by informing the design of person-centered implementation and adoption strategies for future digital health interventions in COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Slevin
- From the The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - T Kessie
- From the The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Cullen
- Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M W Butler
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S C Donnelly
- Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B Caulfield
- From the The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karampela M, Ouhbi S, Isomursu M. Connected Health User Willingness to Share Personal Health Data: Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14537. [PMID: 31774410 PMCID: PMC6906622 DOI: 10.2196/14537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Connected health has created opportunities for leveraging health data to deliver preventive and personalized health care services. The increasing number of personal devices and advances in measurement technologies contribute to an exponential growth in digital health data. The practices for sharing data across the health ecosystem are evolving as there are more opportunities for using such data to deliver responsive health services. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore user attitudes toward sharing personal health data (PHD). The study was executed within the first year after the implementation of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) legal framework. METHODS The authors analyzed the results of an online questionnaire survey to explore the willingness of 8004 people using connected health services across four European countries to share their PHD and the conditions under which they would be willing to do so. RESULTS Our findings indicate that the majority of users are willing to share their personal PHD for scientific research (1811/8004, 22.63%). Age, education level, and occupation of the participants, in addition to the level of digitalization in their country were found to be associated with data sharing attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Positive attitudes toward data sharing for scientific research can be perceived as an indication of trust established between users and academia. Nevertheless, the interpretation of data sharing attitudes is a complex process, related to and influenced by various factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sofia Ouhbi
- United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Litzelman K, Reblin M, McDowell HE, DuBenske LL. Trajectories of social resource use among informal lung cancer caregivers. Cancer 2019; 126:425-431. [PMID: 31626343 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social support is a key component in maintaining cancer caregiver well-being, and many resources exist to facilitate caregivers' use of social support (eg, cancer support groups). This study sought to determine how informal cancer caregivers use social resources over the course of caregiving. METHODS The data are from the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System study of informal caregivers (n = 202) of patients with recently diagnosed lung cancer. Caregivers self-reported their sociodemographic and caregiving characteristics and social resource use over 6 months. Generalized additive models were used to assess social resource use over time, and generalized estimating equation logistic regression models were used to assess the correlates of social resource use. RESULTS Nearly two-thirds of caregivers reported any social resource use. The most prevalent social resources were faith-based groups (38%) and social clubs (30%). Only 1 in 4 caregivers participated in a formal resource such as counseling (11%) or a cancer support group (6%). Social resource use was lowest immediately after the diagnosis and increased over time. Formal resource use exhibited a nonlinear association with time such that formal resource use peaked approximately 9 to 10 months after the cancer diagnosis. Caregivers were more likely to report social resource use if the patient also reported social engagement. CONCLUSIONS This study has found that many cancer caregivers do not use social resources, although social resource use increases over time after the cancer diagnosis. Because of the association between social engagement and well-being, this information may inform future research and interventions to improve outcomes for cancer caregivers and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Litzelman
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Lori L DuBenske
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gonzalez BD. Promise of Mobile Health Technology to Reduce Disparities in Patients With Cancer and Survivors. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-9. [PMID: 30652578 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite recent advances in cancer control, numerous disparities exist in the areas of patient access to care, self-management, and quality of life. However, mobile health technology shows promise as a tool to reduce disparities among patients with cancer and cancer survivors by overcoming such barriers as limited access to providers, difficulty communicating with providers, and inadequate communication between patients and providers regarding symptoms. This narrative review draws on the literature in cancer and noncancer populations to identify factors that create or maintain disparities and to describe opportunities for mobile health technology to reduce disparities.
Collapse
|
22
|
Spronk I, Meijers MC, Heins MJ, Francke AL, Elwyn G, van Lindert A, van Dulmen S, van Vliet LM. Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13079. [PMID: 31066142 PMCID: PMC9286651 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Shared decision making is not always commonplace in advanced colorectal or lung cancer care. Decision aids (DAs) might be helpful. This review aimed (a) to provide an overview of DAs for patients with advanced colorectal or lung cancer and assess their availability; and (b) to assess their effectiveness if possible. Methods A systematic literature search (PubMed/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL) and Internet and expert searches were carried out to identify relevant DAs. Data from the DAs included were extracted and the quality of studies, evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and effectiveness (International Patient Decision Aid Standards) of DAs were determined. Results Ten of the 12 DAs included (four colorectal cancer, four lung cancer and four generic) are still available. Most (9/12) were applicable throughout the disease pathway and usable for all decisions, or to the decision for supportive care with/without anti‐cancer therapy. Seven studies tested effectiveness. Effects on patient outcomes varied, but were generally weakly positive (e.g., DAs improved patient satisfaction) with low evidence. Study quality was fair to good. Conclusion There is a lack of readily available DAs that have been demonstrated to be effective in advanced colorectal or lung cancer. Rigorous testing of the effects of currently available and future DAs, to improve patient outcomes, is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Spronk
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje C Meijers
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marianne J Heins
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth, Massachusetts
| | | | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim SW, Madan J, Dritsaki M, Bryce C, Forjaz V, Fraser J, Griffiths F, Hamilton K, Huxley C, Sturt J. Benefits and Costs of Digital Consulting in Clinics Serving Young People With Long-Term Conditions: Mixed-Methods Approach. JMIR Med Inform 2018; 6:e48. [PMID: 30377145 PMCID: PMC6234335 DOI: 10.2196/medinform.9577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the introduction of digital health technologies in National Health Service (NHS), health professionals are starting to use email, text, and other digital methods to consult with their patients in a timely manner. There is lack of evidence regarding the economic impact of digital consulting in the United Kingdom (UK) NHS. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate the direct costs associated with digital consulting as an adjunct to routine care at 18 clinics serving young people aged 16-24 years with long-term conditions. METHODS This study uses both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 173 clinical team members on the impacts of digital consulting. A structured questionnaire was developed and used for 115 health professionals across 12 health conditions at 18 sites in the United Kingdom to collect data on time and other resources used for digital consulting. A follow-up semistructured interview was conducted with a single senior clinician at each site to clarify the mechanisms through which digital consulting use might lead to outcomes relevant to economic evaluation. We used the two-part model to see the association between the time spent on digital consulting and the job role of staff, type of clinic, and the average length of the working hours using digital consulting. RESULTS When estimated using the two-part model, consultants spent less time on digital consulting compared with nurses (95.48 minutes; P<.001), physiotherapists (55.3 minutes; P<.001), and psychologists (31.67 minutes; P<.001). Part-time staff spent less time using digital consulting than full-time staff despite insignificant result (P=.15). Time spent on digital consulting differed across sites, and no clear pattern in using digital consulting was found. Health professionals qualitatively identified the following 4 potential economic impacts for the NHS: decreasing adverse events, improving patient well-being, decreasing wait lists, and staff workload. We did not find evidence to suggest that the clinical condition was associated with digital consulting use. CONCLUSIONS Nurses and physiotherapists were the greatest users of digital consulting. Teams appear to use an efficient triage system with the most expensive members digitally consulting less than lower-paid team members. Staff report showed concerns regarding time spent digitally consulting, which implies that direct costs increase. There remain considerable gaps in evidence related to cost-effectiveness of digital consulting, but this study has highlighted important cost-related outcomes for assessment in future cost-effectiveness trials of digital consulting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Wook Kim
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Madan
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Melina Dritsaki
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Bryce
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Vera Forjaz
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joe Fraser
- Joe's Diabetes Ltd, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Griffiths
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Hamilton
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Huxley
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
He Y, Gewirtz AH, Lee S, August G. Do Parent Preferences for Child Conduct Problem Interventions Impact Parenting Outcomes? A Pilot Study in Community Children's Mental Health Settings. JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY 2018; 44:716-729. [PMID: 29425398 PMCID: PMC6085174 DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
A pilot, doubly randomized preference trial was conducted to investigate the impact of providing parents preferences on parenting outcomes. Families with children having conduct problems were randomly assigned to a choice group in which they received their preferred treatment among the four intervention options or a no-choice group in which they were randomized assigned to one of the four options. Results of mixed-effects models showed that parents in the choice group who selected Parent Management Training-Oregon Model (PMTO) had better parenting outcomes over time compared to parents in the choice group who selected child therapy. It highlights the importance of incorporating parent preferences in the delivery of evidence-based treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaliu He
- The Family Institute at Northwestern University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ayatollahi H, Hasannezhad M, Fard HS, Haghighi MK. Type 1 diabetes self-management: developing a web-based telemedicine application. HEALTH INF MANAG J 2018; 45:16-26. [PMID: 28691565 DOI: 10.1177/1833358316639456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management skills are essential for patients with diabetes mellitus to minimise the risks of complications from their condition. The aim of this research was to develop a web-based application for self-management of type 1 diabetes, suitable for use by patients, their carers and physicians. METHOD The study was comprised of two phases, the first being analysis of the kind of information and capabilities required by potential users of the system. Based on the results derived from the first phase of the study, the system prototype was designed and then evaluated using the 'think aloud' method and a standard questionnaire. The application was designed for use by patients, their carers and physicians. Patients could enter the level of blood glucose, insulin and activities on a daily basis, and physicians were able to supervise a patient's health status from a distance. RESULTS Users were generally satisfied with the final version of the system. People with a wide range of literacy skills were able to use the system effectively. CONCLUSION Patients or their carers could use the web-based application as a log book by entering the level of blood glucose and insulin doses on a regular basis, and as an educational resource to improve self-management skills. Physicians could use the system at any time convenient to them to support patients by giving medical advice. Further research is needed to report the effectiveness of the system in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haleh Ayatollahi
- 1 Department of Health Information Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mostafa Hasannezhad
- 1 Department of Health Information Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hedieh Saneei Fard
- 2 Paediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehran Kamkar Haghighi
- 1 Department of Health Information Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Karampela M, Ouhbi S, Isomursu M. Personal health data: A systematic mapping study. Int J Med Inform 2018; 118:86-98. [PMID: 30153927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personal health data (PHD) research has been intensified over the last years, attracting the attention of scientists from different fields, such as software engineers, computer scientists and medical professionals. The increasing interest of researchers can be attributed to the exponential growth of the available PHD due to the widespread adoption of ubiquitous technology in everyday life, as well as to the potential of the ongoing digital transformation in healthcare. This increasing interest requires that academia has an overview of the published scientific literature to plan future endeavors. OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study is to identify and address research gaps in literature regarding PHD. METHOD This paper conducts a systematic mapping study to summarize the existing PHD approaches in literature and to organize the selected studies according to six classification criteria: publication source, publication year, research types, empirical types, contribution types and research topic. RESULTS In total 79 papers have been included after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and have been classified accordingly. There is an increasing amount of attention that has been paid to PHD since 2014. The majority of papers is published in journals. The two main research types found were solution proposals and evaluation research. The majority of the selected papers were empirically evaluated. The main contribution types were methods and frameworks. Data privacy is the most frequently addressed topic in PHD literature, followed by data sharing. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this systematic mapping study have implications for both researchers who are planning new studies in PHD and for practitioners who are working in connected health and would like to have an overview on the existent studies on PHD research area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Karampela
- IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Rued Langgaards Vej 7, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
| | - Sofia Ouhbi
- TICLab, FIL, International University of Rabat, Technopolis Rabat-Shore Rocade Rabat-Salé, Rabat, Morocco.
| | - Minna Isomursu
- IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Rued Langgaards Vej 7, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Duggleby W, Ghosh S, Struthers-Montford K, Nekolaichuk C, Cumming C, Thomas R, Tonkin K, Swindle J. Feasibility Study of an Online Intervention to Support Male Spouses of Women With Breast Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2018; 44:765-775. [PMID: 29052658 DOI: 10.1188/17.onf.765-775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of a web-based psychosocial supportive intervention entitled Male Transition Toolkit (MaTT).
. DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial, mixed methods, concurrent feasibility design.
. SETTING Edmonton, a large metropolitan city in western Canada.
. SAMPLE 40 dyads (women with breast cancer and their spouse).
. METHODS Male spouse participants in the treatment group accessed MaTT for four weeks. Data on hope, quality of life, general self-efficacy, and caregiver guilt were collected at baseline and days 14, 28, and 56. Quality-of-life data were collected from the women with breast cancer at each time period. Qualitative data were collected from the usual care group in an open-ended interview and from the treatment group in an evaluation survey on days 14 and 28.
. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Feasibility, as measured by the MaTT questionnaire.
. FINDINGS Evaluation survey scores indicated that MaTT was feasible, acceptable, and easy to use. Male spouse quality-of-life scores were not significantly different between groups. As guilt scores decreased, male spouses' quality of life increased.
. CONCLUSIONS The findings provided useful information to strengthen MaTT and improve study design. Additional research is needed to determine its efficacy in improving male spouses' quality of life.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MaTT is a feasible intervention. Future research should evaluate MaTT with larger samples as well as determine the amount of time participants used MaTT.
Collapse
|
28
|
Conflicting Online Health Information and Rational Decision Making: Implication for Cancer Survivors. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2018; 36:184-191. [PMID: 28383314 DOI: 10.1097/hcm.0000000000000159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Although people in the social media age can access health information easier, they have difficulty judging conflicting rational information or summarizing the large amounts of health information available. Conflicting health information occurs when contrary assertions or information about a certain health issue comes from different information sources. This study examined the background knowledge and the current phenomenon of why conflicting health information occurs in real-world conditions. We also reviewed causes and solutions by reviewing the literature. In particular, we recommend a method that solves problems that patients have including cancer survivors who cannot themselves be active in seeking health information. Thus, we categorized the specific types of conflicting health information and analyzed the sociodemographic factors and information carrier factors that have an impact on the health information-seeking behavior of individuals.
Collapse
|
29
|
Tuomisto S, Koivula M, Åstedt-Kurki P, Helminen M. Family involvement in rehabilitation: Coronary artery disease-patients' perspectives. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:3020-3031. [PMID: 29679418 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To describe coronary artery disease patients' perceptions of family involvement in rehabilitation and the connection between background factors and family involvement. BACKGROUND Coronary artery disease patients' hospital stays can be very concise. Family members can support rehabilitation, but many challenges can emerge. There is a need to nurture patients and family members in an individual way and to recognise their concerns. More accurate patient education should be available for patients and their family members. DESIGN This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study. METHODS Data were collected from patients with coronary artery disease at least 6 weeks after discharge from hospital (n = 169) with a postal questionnaire. The Family Involvement in Rehabilitation (FIRE) scale measures family members' promotion of patients' rehabilitation and issues encumbering rehabilitation in family. The data have been analysed with statistical methods. Both parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate group differences. RESULTS Patients with coronary artery disease perceived that family promotes their rehabilitation significantly. Respondents also perceived challenges at home. Family relations before hospitalisation were related to all subareas of family promoting rehabilitation and one subarea of issues encumbering rehabilitation in family. Patients with symptoms at rest also had more encumbrance on their rehabilitation. Patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery perceived more challenges than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients in many subareas of issues encumbering rehabilitation in family. CONCLUSIONS Family relations prior to illness and the rigour of heart symptoms are significantly relevant to challenges that can occur between patient and their family members. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Healthcare staff need to pay attention to coronary artery disease patients' individual situation, and patient education should be more family-centred. In the future, it would be noteworthy to collect more data from family members of patients with coronary artery disease and to find out their perceptions of family involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Tuomisto
- Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Meeri Koivula
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Päivi Åstedt-Kurki
- Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mika Helminen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.,Science Center, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Masuku KP, Mophosho M, Tshabalala M. 'I felt pain. Deep pain…': Experiences of primary caregivers of stroke survivors with aphasia in a South African township. Afr J Disabil 2018. [PMID: 29535917 PMCID: PMC5843930 DOI: 10.4102/ajod.v7i0.368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aphasia is an acquired impairment in language and in the cognitive processes that underlie language. Aphasia affects the quality of life of the person with aphasia (PWA) and his or her families in various ways in diverse contexts and cultures. It is therefore important that speech language therapists understand how different contextual and cultural factors may mediate experiences. Purpose The aim of the study was to describe the caregiving experience of female caregivers of PWA residing in Tembisa, a township situated in the east of Johannesburg. Method Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary caregivers of PWA. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 14 primary caregivers of PWA who were daughters, daughters-in-law or wives of the PWA. The interviews were conducted in participants’ first language and analysed by the researcher, who is proficient in isiZulu. Data were analysed according to the principles of thematic analysis. Results Findings indicated that caregivers are unfamiliar with aphasia and the support available to them. Participants experienced frustration and found communication to be challenging owing to their lack of communication strategies. The participants’ experiences reflected their context-specific experiences, such as feminisation of caregiving, barriers to healthcare, the influence of low health literacy and contextual perspectives on stroke and aphasia. Conclusions Contextual factors of caregivers in Tembisa have an influence on the experiences between caregivers and PWA, the feelings of individuals and families and health-seeking behaviours of individuals and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khetsiwe P Masuku
- Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
| | - Munyane Mophosho
- Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
| | - Muziwakhe Tshabalala
- Department of Physiotherapy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yuen EYN, Knight T, Ricciardelli LA, Burney S. Health literacy of caregivers of adult care recipients: A systematic scoping review. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2018; 26:e191-e206. [PMID: 27426731 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Caregivers play a vital role in providing support to adults with a chronic condition, or cognitive or physical impairment. Low health literacy in caregivers has the potential to impact adequate care provision, and consequently, care recipient health outcomes. The aim of the study was to systematically review literature related to health literacy of caregivers of adult care recipients, and examine its relationship with care recipient, and caregiver, health outcomes. Electronic databases were searched for relevant English-language publications that assessed health literacy in caregivers. Included studies were abstracted into evidence tables and assessed using an eight-item quality scale. The search identified 2717 new titles and abstracts, with 67 shortlisted for full review. Twelve papers from 2003 to 2015 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of limited health literacy in caregivers ranged from 0% to 52.5% depending on the measure and cut-off criteria used. Associations were found between low caregiver health literacy and (i) poorer care recipient self-management behaviours; (ii) increased care recipient use of health services; and (iii) increased caregiver burden. The quality of the studies ranged from fair to excellent. Low health literacy in caregivers differed depending on the measures and scoring criteria used. Evidence to support the relationship between caregiver health literacy and care recipient, and caregiver health outcomes was limited to single studies. Recommendations for further research include: the development of caregiver health literacy measures across different populations; examination of associations between caregiver health literacy and care recipient outcomes; and the development of interventions designed to improve caregiver health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Y N Yuen
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
- College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tess Knight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Susan Burney
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Szalmuk Family Psycho-oncology Unit, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Quanbeck A, Gustafson DH, Marsch LA, Chih MY, Kornfield R, McTavish F, Johnson R, Brown RT, Mares ML, Shah DV. Implementing a Mobile Health System to Integrate the Treatment of Addiction Into Primary Care: A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e37. [PMID: 29382624 PMCID: PMC5811649 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the near ubiquity of mobile phones, little research has been conducted on the implementation of mobile health (mHealth) apps to treat patients in primary care. Although primary care clinicians routinely treat chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes, they rarely treat addiction, a common chronic condition. Instead, addiction is most often treated in the US health care system, if it is treated at all, in a separate behavioral health system. mHealth could help integrate addiction treatment in primary care. OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to report the effects of implementing an mHealth system for addiction in primary care on both patients and clinicians. METHODS In this implementation research trial, an evidence-based mHealth system named Seva was introduced sequentially over 36 months to a maximum of 100 patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) in each of three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs; primary care clinics that serve patients regardless of their ability to pay). This paper reports on patient and clinician outcomes organized according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. RESULTS The outcomes according to the RE-AIM framework are as follows: Reach-Seva reached 8.31% (268/3226) of appropriate patients. Reach was limited by our ability to pay for phones and data plans for a maximum of 100 patients per clinic. Effectiveness-Patients who were given Seva had significant improvements in their risky drinking days (44% reduction, (0.7-1.25)/1.25, P=.04), illicit drug-use days (34% reduction, (2.14-3.22)/3.22, P=.01), quality of life, human immunodeficiency virus screening rates, and number of hospitalizations. Through Seva, patients also provided peer support to one another in ways that are novel in primary care settings. Adoption-Patients sustained high levels of Seva use-between 53% and 60% of the patients at the 3 sites accessed Seva during the last week of the 12-month implementation period. Among clinicians, use of the technology was less robust than use by patients, with only a handful of clinicians using Seva in each clinic and behavioral health providers making most referrals to Seva in 2 of the 3 clinics. Implementation-At 2 sites, implementation plans were realized successfully; they were delayed in the third. Maintenance-Use of Seva dropped when grant funding stopped paying for the mobile phones and data plans. Two of the 3 clinics wanted to maintain the use of Seva, but they struggled to find funding to support this. CONCLUSIONS Implementing an mHealth system can improve care among primary care patients with SUDs, and patients using the system can support one another in their recovery. Among clinicians, however, implementation requires figuring out how information from the mHealth system will be used and making mHealth data available in the electronic health (eHealth) record. In addition, paying for an mHealth system remains a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Quanbeck
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Lisa A Marsch
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Ming-Yuan Chih
- College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Rachel Kornfield
- School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Fiona McTavish
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Roberta Johnson
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Randall T Brown
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Marie-Louise Mares
- College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Dhavan V Shah
- School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hawley ST, Li Y, An LC, Resnicow K, Janz NK, Sabel MS, Ward KC, Fagerlin A, Morrow M, Jagsi R, Hofer TP, Katz SJ. Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:659-666. [PMID: 29364772 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.74.8442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to determine the effect of iCanDecide, an interactive and tailored breast cancer treatment decision tool, on the rate of high-quality patient decisions-both informed and values concordant-regarding locoregional breast cancer treatment and on patient appraisal of decision making. Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial of newly diagnosed patients with early-stage breast cancer making locoregional treatment decisions. From 22 surgical practices, 537 patients were recruited and randomly assigned online to the iCanDecide interactive and tailored Web site (intervention) or the iCanDecide static Web site (control). Participants completed a baseline survey and were mailed a follow-up survey 4 to 5 weeks after enrollment to assess the primary outcome of a high-quality decision, which consisted of two components, high knowledge and values-concordant treatment, and secondary outcomes (decision preparation, deliberation, and subjective decision quality). Results Patients in the intervention arm had higher odds of making a high-quality decision than did those in the control arm (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.92; P = .0004), which was driven primarily by differences in the rates of high knowledge between groups. The majority of patients in both arms made values-concordant treatment decisions (78.6% in the intervention arm and 81.4% in the control arm). More patients in the intervention arm had high decision preparation (estimate, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.34; P = .027), but there were no significant differences in the other decision appraisal outcomes. The effect of the intervention was similar for women who were leaning strongly toward a treatment option at enrollment compared with those who were not. Conclusion The tailored and interactive iCanDecide Web site, which focused on knowledge building and values clarification, positively affected high-quality decisions largely by improving knowledge compared with static online information. To be effective, future patient-facing decision tools should be integrated into the clinical workflow to improve decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah T Hawley
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yun Li
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lawrence C An
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Resnicow
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy K Janz
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael S Sabel
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kevin C Ward
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Monica Morrow
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Timothy P Hofer
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven J Katz
- Sarah T. Hawley, Lawrence C. An, Michael S. Sabel, Reshma Jagsi, Timothy P. Hofer, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan Medical School; Sarah T. Hawley, Yun Li, Kenneth Resnicow, Nancy K. Janz, and Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan School of Public Health; Sarah T. Hawley, VA Health Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; Kevin C. Ward, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Angela Fagerlin, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kurahashi AM, Stinson JN, van Wyk M, Luca S, Jamieson T, Weinstein P, Cafazzo JA, Lokuge B, Cohen E, Rapoport A, Husain A. The Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness of Loop: Evaluation and Content Analysis of a Web-Based Clinical Collaboration System. JMIR Hum Factors 2018; 5:e2. [PMID: 29317386 PMCID: PMC5780614 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.7882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with complex health care needs require the expertise of many health care providers. Communication, collaboration, and patient-centered care positively impact care quality and patient outcomes. Few technologies exist that facilitate collaboration between providers across settings of care and also engage the patient. We developed a Web-based clinical collaboration system, Loop, to address this gap. The likelihood of a technological system's uptake is associated with its perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. We engaged stakeholders in the conceptualization and development of Loop in an effort to maximize its intuitiveness and utility. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to report end users' perceptions about the ease of use and usefulness of Loop captured during usability tests of Loop. METHODS Participants represented three user types (patients, caregivers, and health care providers) recruited from three populations (adults with cancer, adolescents and young adults with cancer, and children with medical complexity). We conducted usability testing over three iterative cycles of testing and development in both laboratory-based and off-site environments. We performed a content analysis of usability testing transcripts to summarize and describe participant perceptions about the ease of use and usefulness of Loop. RESULTS Participants enjoyed testing Loop and were able to use the core functions-composing, posting, and reading messages-with little difficulty. They had difficulty interpreting certain visual cues and design elements or the purpose of some features. This difficulty negatively impacted perceived ease of use but was primarily limited to auxiliary features. Participants predicted that Loop could improve the efficiency and effectiveness of communication between care team members; however, this perceived usefulness could be compromised by disruptions to personal workflow such as additional time or task requirements. CONCLUSIONS Loop was perceived to have value as a collaboration system; however, usability testing findings indicate that some design and functional elements need to be addressed to improve ease of use. Additionally, participant concerns highlight the need to consider how a system can be implemented so as to minimize impact on workflow and optimize usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Kurahashi
- The Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer N Stinson
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Margaret van Wyk
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Trevor Jamieson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Weinstein
- Healthcare Human Factors, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph A Cafazzo
- Healthcare Human Factors, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bhadra Lokuge
- The Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adam Rapoport
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Emily's House Children's Hospice, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amna Husain
- The Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gustafson DH, DuBenske LL, Atwood AK, Chih MY, Johnson RA, McTavish F, Quanbeck A, Brown RL, Cleary JF, Shah D. Reducing Symptom Distress in Patients With Advanced Cancer Using an e-Alert System for Caregivers: Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Clinical Trials. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e354. [PMID: 29138131 PMCID: PMC5705856 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Symptom distress in patients toward the end of life can change rapidly. Family caregivers have the potential to help patients manage those symptoms, as well as their own stress, if they are equipped with the proper resources. Electronic health (eHealth) systems may be able to provide those resources. Very sick patients may not be able to use such systems themselves to report their symptoms but family caregivers could. Objective The aim of this paper was to assess the effects on cancer patient symptom distress of an eHealth system that alerts clinicians to significant changes in the patient’s symptoms, as reported by a family caregiver. Methods A pooled analysis from two randomized clinical trials (NCT00214162 and NCT00365963) compared outcomes at 12 months for two unblinded groups: a control group (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System [CHESS]-Only) that gave caregivers access to CHESS, an online support system, and an experimental group (CHESS+CR [Clinician Report]), which also had CHESS but with a CR that automatically alerted clinicians if symptoms exceeded a predetermined threshold of severity. Participants were dyads (n=235) of patients with advanced lung, breast, or prostate cancer and their respective family caregivers from 5 oncology clinics in the United States of America. The proportion of improved patient threshold symptoms was compared between groups using area-under-the-curve analysis and binomial proportion tests. The proportion of threshold symptoms out of all reported symptoms was also examined. Results When severe caregiver-reported symptoms were shared with clinicians, the symptoms were more likely to be subsequently reported as improved than when the symptoms were not shared with clinicians (P<.001). Fewer symptom reports were completed in the group of caregivers whose reports went to clinicians than in the CHESS-Only group (P<.001), perhaps because caregivers, knowing their reports might be sent to a doctor, feared they might be bothering the clinician. Conclusions This study suggests that an eHealth system designed for caregivers that alerts clinicians to worrisome changes in patient health status may lead to reduced patient distress. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00214162; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00214162 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6nmgdGfuD) and Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00365963; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00365963 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6nmh0U8VP)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gustafson
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Lori L DuBenske
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Amy K Atwood
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Ming-Yuan Chih
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Roberta A Johnson
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Fiona McTavish
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Andrew Quanbeck
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Roger L Brown
- Nursing Research Department, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - James F Cleary
- Medical Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Dhavan Shah
- Mass Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
The wonders of high-tech cancer care are best complemented by the humanity of high-touch care. Simple kindnesses can help to diffuse negative emotions that are associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment—and may even help to improve patients’ outcomes. On the basis of our experience in cancer care and research, we propose six types of kindness in cancer care: deep listening , whereby clinicians take the time to truly understand the needs and concerns of patients and their families; empathy for the patient with cancer, expressed by both individual clinicians and the care culture, that seeks to prevent avoidable suffering; generous acts of discretionary effort that go beyond what patients and families expect from a care team; timely care that is delivered by using a variety of tools and systems that reduce stress and anxiety; gentle honesty, whereby the truth is conveyed directly in well-chosen, guiding words; and support for family caregivers, whose physical and mental well-being are vital components of the care their loved ones receive. These mutually reinforcing manifestations of kindness—exhibited by self-aware clinicians who understand that how care is delivered matters—constitute a powerful and practical way to temper the emotional turmoil of cancer for patients, their families, and clinicians themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard L. Berry
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tracey S. Danaher
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert A. Chapman
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rana L.A. Awdish
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Janssen A, Brunner M, Keep M, Hines M, Nagarajan SV, Kielly-Carroll C, Dennis S, McKeough Z, Shaw T. Interdisciplinary eHealth Practice in Cancer Care: A Review of the Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2017; 14:ijerph14111289. [PMID: 29068377 PMCID: PMC5707928 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This review aimed to identify research that described how eHealth facilitates interdisciplinary cancer care and to understand the ways in which eHealth innovations are being used in this setting. An integrative review of eHealth interventions used for interdisciplinary care for people with cancer was conducted by systematically searching research databases in March 2015, and repeated in September 2016. Searches resulted in 8531 citations, of which 140 were retrieved and scanned in full, with twenty-six studies included in the review. Analysis of data extracted from the included articles revealed five broad themes: (i) data collection and accessibility; (ii) virtual multidisciplinary teams; (iii) communication between individuals involved in the delivery of health services; (iv) communication pathways between patients and cancer care teams; and (v) health professional-led change. Use of eHealth interventions in cancer care was widespread, particularly to support interdisciplinary care. However, research has focused on development and implementation of interventions, rather than on long-term impact. Further research is warranted to explore design, evaluation, and long-term sustainability of eHealth systems and interventions in interdisciplinary cancer care. Technology evolves quickly and researchers need to provide health professionals with timely guidance on how best to respond to new technologies in the health sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Janssen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - Melissa Brunner
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
- Faculty of Education and Arts, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
| | - Melanie Keep
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - Monique Hines
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | | | | | - Sarah Dennis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
| | - Zoe McKeough
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - Tim Shaw
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jackson DN, Chou WYS, Coa KI, Oh A, Hesse B. Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3. Transl Behav Med 2017; 6:566-576. [PMID: 27628436 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-016-0437-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the association between Internet/social media use and health information technology (HIT) engagement. This study examines patterns of social media use and HIT engagement in the U.S.A. using data from the 2013 Health Information National Trends Survey (N = 3,164). Specifically, predictors of two HIT activities (i.e., communicating with a healthcare provider using the Internet or email and tracking personal health information electronically) are examined. Persons who were females, higher education, non-Hispanic others, having a regular healthcare provider, and ages 35-44 were more likely to participate in HIT activities. After controlling for sociodemographics and health correlates, social media use was significantly associated with HIT engagement. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to systematically examine the use and relationships across multiple types of health-related online media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devlon N Jackson
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
- Maryland Center for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
| | - Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Kisha I Coa
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - April Oh
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Bradford Hesse
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shen J, Naeim A. Telehealth in older adults with cancer in the United States: The emerging use of wearable sensors. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 8:437-442. [PMID: 28888556 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
As the aging and cancer populations in the world continue to increase, the need for complements to traditional geriatric assessments and the logical incorporation of fast and reliable telehealth tools have become interlinked. In the United States, studies examining the use of telehealth for chronic disease management have shown promising results in small groups. The implementation of health technology on a broader scale requires older adults to both accept and adapt such innovation into routine medical care. Though the commercial and recreational use of new technology has increased in older individuals, the transition into creating a smart and connected home that can interface with both patients and healthcare professionals is in its early phases. Current limitations include an inherent digital divide, as well as concerns regarding privacy, data volume, rapid change, cost and reimbursement. The emergence of low-cost, high-fidelity wearable sensors with a spectrum of clinical utility may be the key to increased use and adaptation by older adults. An opportunity to utilize wearable sensors for objective and real-time assessment of older patients with cancer for baseline functional status and treatment toxicity may be on the horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Shen
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
| | - Arash Naeim
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wasilewski MB, Stinson JN, Cameron JI. Web-based health interventions for family caregivers of elderly individuals: A Scoping Review. Int J Med Inform 2017; 103:109-138. [PMID: 28550996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the growing proportion of elders globally, aging-related illnesses are primary causes of morbidity causing reliance on family members for support in the community. Family caregivers experience poorer physical and mental health than their non-caregiving counterparts. Web-based interventions can provide accessible support to family caregivers to offset declines in their health and well-being. Existing reviews focused on web-based interventions for caregivers have been limited to single illness populations and have mostly focused on the efficacy of the interventions. We therefore have limited insight into how web-based interventions for family caregiver have been developed, implemented and evaluated across aging-related illness. OBJECTIVES To describe: a) theoretical underpinnings of the literature; b) development, content and delivery of web-based interventions; c) caregiver usage of web-based interventions; d) caregiver experience with web-based interventions and e) impact of web-based interventions on caregivers' health outcomes. METHODS We followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews which entails setting research questions, selecting relevant studies, charting the data and synthesizing the results in a report. RESULTS Fifty-three publications representing 32 unique web-based interventions were included. Over half of the interventions were targeted at dementia caregivers, with the rest targeting caregivers to the stroke, cancer, diabetes and general frailty populations. Studies used theory across the intervention trajectory. Interventions aimed to improve a range of health outcomes for caregivers through static and interactive delivery methods Caregivers were satisfied with the usability and accessibility of the websites but usage was generally low and declined over time. Depression and caregiver burden were the most common outcomes evaluated. The interventions ranged in their impact on health and social outcomes but reductions in perception of caregiver burden were consistently observed. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers value interactive interventions that are tailored to their unique needs and the illness context. However, usage of the interventions was sporadic and declined over time, indicating that future interventions should address stage-specific needs across the caregiving trajectory. A systematic review has the potential to be conducted given the consistency in caregiver burden and depression as outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jill I Cameron
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mohammadzadeh Z, Davoodi S, Ghazisaeidi M. Online Social Networks - Opportunities for Empowering Cancer Patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 17:933-6. [PMID: 27039815 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.3.933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Online social network technologies have become important to health and apply in most health care areas. Particularly in cancer care, because it is a disease which involves many social aspects, online social networks can be very useful. Use of online social networks provides a suitable platform for cancer patients and families to present and share information about their medical conditions, address their educational needs, support decision making, and help to coping with their disease and improve their own outcomes. Like any other new technologies, online social networks, along with many benefits, have some negative effects such as violation of privacy and publication of incorrect information. However, if these effects are managed properly, they can empower patients to manage cancer through changing behavioral patterns and enhancing the quality of cancer patients lives This paper explains some application of online social networks in the cancer patient care process. It also covers advantages and disadvantages of related technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Mohammadzadeh
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran E-mail :
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Berry LL, Dalwadi SM, Jacobson JO. Supporting the Supporters: What Family Caregivers Need to Care for a Loved One With Cancer. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:35-41. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.017913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer who live at home often require help with activities of daily living, basic medical care (eg, injections), social needs, and patient advocacy. Most of that support comes from intimate caregivers, typically members of the patient’s family. These family caregivers themselves require support so that they can be effective and maintain their own well-being while caring for the patient with cancer. Research shows that support for caregivers contributes to achieving these goals. We propose a four-part framework for supporting family caregivers: (1) assess caregivers’ needs using formal measures, just as the cancer patient’s own needs are assessed, (2) educate caregivers for their caregiving roles, most notably, with training in the low-level medical support that cancer patients require at home, (3) empower caregivers to become full-fledged members of the patient’s cancer team, all working toward common goals, and (4) assist caregivers proactively in their duties, so that they retain a sense of control and self-efficacy rather than having to react to imminent medical crises without sufficient resources at their disposal. Funding support for family caregivers requires refocusing on the overall well-being of the patient-caregiver dyad rather than just on the patient. It will necessitate a paradigm shift in reimbursement that recognizes the need for holistic cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard L. Berry
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shraddha Mahesh Dalwadi
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph O. Jacobson
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cukor D, Cohen LM, Cope EL, Ghahramani N, Hedayati SS, Hynes DM, Shah VO, Tentori F, Unruh M, Bobelu J, Cohen S, Dember LM, Faber T, Fischer MJ, Gallardo R, Germain MJ, Ghahate D, Grote N, Hartwell L, Heagerty P, Kimmel PL, Kutner N, Lawson S, Marr L, Nelson RG, Porter AC, Sandy P, Struminger BB, Subramanian L, Weisbord S, Young B, Mehrotra R. Patient and Other Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Funded Studies of Patients with Kidney Diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11:1703-1712. [PMID: 27197911 PMCID: PMC5012486 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.09780915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Including target populations in the design and implementation of research trials has been one response to the growing health disparities endemic to our health care system, as well as an aid to study generalizability. One type of community-based participatory research is "Patient Centered-Research", in which patient perspectives on the germane research questions and methodologies are incorporated into the study. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) has mandated that meaningful patient and stakeholder engagement be incorporated into all applications. As of March 2015, PCORI funded seven clinically-focused studies of patients with kidney disease. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the experiences of these studies to gain an understanding of how meaningful patient and stakeholder engagement can occur in clinical research of kidney diseases, and what the key barriers are to its implementation. Our collective experience suggests that successful implementation of a patient- and stakeholder-engaged research paradigm involves: (1) defining the roles and process for the incorporation of input; (2) identifying the particular patients and other stakeholders; (3) engaging patients and other stakeholders so they appreciate the value of their own participation and have personal investment in the research process; and (4) overcoming barriers and challenges that arise and threaten the productivity of the collaboration. It is our hope that the experiences of these studies will further interest and capacity for incorporating patient and stakeholder perspectives in research of kidney diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cukor
- Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Badr H, Lipnick D, Diefenbach MA, Posner M, Kotz T, Miles B, Genden E. Development and usability testing of a web-based self-management intervention for oral cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 25:806-21. [PMID: 26507369 PMCID: PMC4848171 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Oral cancer (OC) survivors experience debilitating side effects that affect their quality of life (QOL) and that of their caregivers. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a dyadic, web-based intervention to improve survivor self-management and survivor/caregiver QOL. A qualitative needs assessment (semi-structured interviews) with 13 OC survivors and 12 caregivers was conducted to discern information and support needs as well as preferences regarding website features and tools. Results using Grounded Theory analysis showed that OC survivors and caregivers: (1) want and need practical advice about managing side effects; (2) want to reach out to other survivors/caregivers for information and support; and (3) have both overlapping and unique needs and preferences regarding website features. Usability testing (N = 6 survivors; 5 caregivers) uncovered problems with the intuitiveness, navigation and design of the website that were subsequently addressed. Users rated the website favourably on the dimensions of attractiveness, controllability, efficiency, intuitiveness and learnability, and gave it a total usability score of 80/100. Overall, this study demonstrates that OC survivors and caregivers are interested in using an online programme to improve QOL, and that providing tailored website content and features based on the person's role as survivor or caregiver is important in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Badr
- Department of Oncological Sciences
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Daniella Lipnick
- Department of Oncological Sciences
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Diefenbach
- Departments of Medicine and Urology
- North Shore – Long Island Jewish Health Systems, New York, USA
| | - Marshall Posner
- Department of Otolaryngology
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Tamar Kotz
- Department of Otolaryngology
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Brett Miles
- Department of Otolaryngology
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Eric Genden
- Department of Otolaryngology
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
A tailored Web-based psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 2016; 37:321-30. [PMID: 24945270 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most programs addressing psychosocial concerns of cancer survivors are in-person programs that are expensive to deliver, have limited availability, and seldom deal with caregivers' concerns. OBJECTIVE This study examined the feasibility of translating an efficacious nurse-delivered program (FOCUS Program) for patients and their caregivers to a tailored, dyadic Web-based format. Specific aims were to (1) test the preliminary effects of the Web-based intervention on patient and caregiver outcomes, (2) examine participants' program satisfaction, and (3) determine the feasibility of using a Web-based delivery format. METHODS A phase 2 feasibility study was conducted with cancer patients (lung, breast, colorectal, prostate) and their family caregivers (N = 38 dyads). The Web-based intervention provided information and support tailored to the unique characteristics of each patient, caregiver, and their dyadic relationship. Primary outcomes were emotional distress and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were benefits of illness/caregiving, communication, support, and self-efficacy. Analyses included descriptive statistics and repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS Dyads had a significant decrease in emotional distress, increase in quality of life, and perceived more benefits of illness/caregiving. Caregivers also had significant improvement in self-efficacy. There were no changes in communication. Participants were satisfied with program usability, but recommended additional content. CONCLUSIONS It was possible to translate a clinician-delivered program to a Web-based format that was easy to use and had positive effects on dyadic outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The Web-based program is a promising way to provide psychosocial care to more patients and caregivers using fewer personnel. It needs further testing in a larger randomized clinical trial.
Collapse
|
46
|
Itzhaki M, Hildesheimer G, Barnoy S, Katz M. Family involvement in medical decision-making: Perceptions of nursing and psychology students. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2016; 40:181-187. [PMID: 27125170 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2015] [Revised: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family members often rely on health care professionals to guide and support them through the decision-making process. Although family involvement in medical decisions should be included in the preservice curriculum for the health care professions, perceptions of students in caring professions on family involvement in medical decision-making have not yet been examined. OBJECTIVE To examine the perceptions of nursing and psychology students on family involvement in medical decision-making for seriously ill patients. DESIGN A descriptive cross-sectional design was used. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS First year undergraduate nursing and psychology students studying for their Bachelor of Arts degree were recruited. METHODS Perceptions were assessed with a questionnaire constructed based on the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT), which examines decision-maker preferences. The questionnaire consisted of two parts referring to the respondent once as the patient and then as the family caregiver. RESULTS Questionnaires were completed by 116 nursing students and 156 psychology students. Most were of the opinion that family involvement in decision-making is appropriate, especially when the patient is incapable of making decisions. Nursing students were more inclined than psychology students to think that financial, emotional, and value-based considerations should be part of the family's involvement in decision-making. Both groups of students perceived the emotional consideration as most acceptable, whereas the financial consideration was considered the least acceptable. CONCLUSIONS Nursing and psychology students perceive family involvement in medical decision-making as appropriate. In order to train students to support families in the process of decision-making, further research should examine Shared Decision-Making (SDM) programs, which involve patient and clinician collaboration in health care decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Itzhaki
- Nursing Department, School of Health Professions, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Galya Hildesheimer
- School of Law and Health Systems Administration Program, Peres Academic Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Sivia Barnoy
- Nursing Department, School of Health Professions, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michael Katz
- Department of Counseling and Human Development, Faculty of Education, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, Litzelman K, Chou WYS, Shelburne N, Timura C, O'Mara A, Huss K. Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer 2016; 122:1987-95. [PMID: 26991807 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 335] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Informal/family caregivers are a fundamental source of care for cancer patients in the United States, yet the population of caregivers and their tasks, psychosocial needs, and health outcomes are not well understood. Changes in the nature of cancer care and its delivery, along with the growing population of survivors and their caregivers, warrant increased attention to the roles and demands of caregiving. This article reviews current evidence presented at a 2-day meeting examining the state of the science of informal cancer caregiving that was convened by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research. The meeting sought to define who is an informal cancer caregiver, summarize the state of the science in informal cancer caregiving, and describe both the kinds of interventions developed to address caregiving challenges and the various outcomes used to evaluate their impact. This article offers recommendations for moving science forward in 4 areas: 1) improving the estimation of the prevalence and burden of informal cancer caregiving; 2) advancing the development of interventions designed to improve outcomes for cancer patients, caregivers, and patient-caregiver dyads; 3) generating and testing strategies for integrating caregivers into formal health care settings; and 4) promoting the use of technology to support informal cancer caregivers. Cancer 2016;122:1987-95. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Kent
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Julia H Rowland
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Kristin Litzelman
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nonniekaye Shelburne
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Catherine Timura
- Division of Science Policy and Public Liaison, National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ann O'Mara
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Karen Huss
- Division of Extramural Science Programs, Office of Extramural Programs, National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kaltenbaugh DJ, Klem ML, Hu L, Turi E, Haines AJ, Hagerty Lingler J. Using Web-based interventions to support caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015; 42:156-64. [PMID: 25806882 DOI: 10.1188/15.onf.156-164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To explore the literature to examine the physical, social, psychological, financial, usability, and feasibility outcomes of Web-based interventions on caregivers of people with cancer and to identify potential trends in this body of evidence. DATA SOURCES PubMed, CINAHL®, PsycINFO®, and Inspec. DATA SYNTHESIS Six articles met inclusion criteria. Across studies, most caregivers were middle-aged female spouses with some college attendance who felt "somewhat comfortable" using the Internet. Caregiver interventions used single- and multicomponent services and reduced negative mood. CONCLUSIONS Web-based caregiver interventions can be beneficial in offering information and support and may positively influence the social and psychological outcomes in this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Many studies described caregiver Internet usage and interventional perceptions and needs, but few have examined the impact of web-based interventions on caregivers. More research is needed to produce high-quality evidence in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Lou Klem
- Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lu Hu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Alice J Haines
- Department of Acute/Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lapid MI, Atherton PJ, Clark MM, Kung S, Sloan JA, Rummans TA. Cancer Caregiver: Perceived Benefits of Technology. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21:893-902. [PMID: 26075800 PMCID: PMC4649772 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden associated with caregiving has been well documented. Caregivers have multiple responsibilities, and technology may be accessible as a potential burden-alleviating resource. MATERIALS AND METHODS We surveyed cancer caregivers regarding current technology use and willingness to use technology for easing burden or distress. Because age has been associated with technology use, responses were compared between geriatric (≥65 years old) and nongeriatric (18-64 years old) caregivers. RESULTS We had 112 respondents. Based on nonmissing responses, 66% (n=71) were women, 95% (n=106) were white, and 84% (n=91) had post-high school education. Almost all caregivers reported having Internet (105 [94%]) and e-mail (102 [91%]) access. Nongeriatric caregivers indicated more willingness to access Internet-based tools that help caregivers (54 [93%] versus 41 [76%]; p=0.04) and were more frequent users of social media (37 [64%] versus 16 [30%]; p=0.01), smartphones (33 [57%] versus 16 [30%]; p=0.01), and other mobile wireless devices (42 [72%] versus 19 [35%]; p<0.001) than geriatric caregivers. They also more frequently expected technologies to improve their own quality of life (p=0.009), increase their feelings of being effective as a caregiver (p=0.02), and save time (p=0.003). Regardless of age, a majority of caregivers (67 [62%]) endorsed the potential benefit of caregiving technologies in preventing burnout. CONCLUSIONS Most caregivers have high access to and use of technology. Geriatric and nongeriatric caregivers were receptive to technology-based tools to help with their caregiving roles. Although nongeriatric caregivers expected to derive more benefit from such tools, both groups believed that caregiving technologies could reduce burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria I. Lapid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Pamela J. Atherton
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Matthew M. Clark
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Simon Kung
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeff A. Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Teresa A. Rummans
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jiang S, Li P. [Progress in Palliative Care Benefit of Elderly Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2015; 18:462-8. [PMID: 26182873 PMCID: PMC6000248 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.07.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
在中国,肺癌的发病率和病死率均居恶性肿瘤的第一位。有近一半的肺癌发生在年龄大于70岁的老年患者。肺癌中约85%是非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC),且大多数肺癌患者发现时已属中晚期。老年晚期NSCLC患者具有伴随疾病多、器官功能衰退等特点。制定恰当的治疗策略是我们面临的挑战。姑息治疗作为特殊的医疗关怀,是老年晚期NSCLC的重要治疗方式之一。低剂量局部姑息放疗可以有效改善老年NSCLC患者的呼吸道症状,且副作用可以耐受;对于表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR)突变的老年晚期NSCLC,吉非替尼在疾病控制率、症状缓解等方面均可使老年患者从治疗中获益。同时,老年晚期NSCLC患者对厄洛替尼也显示出良好的耐受性;氩氦刀在治疗老年NSCLC患者的应用有增加趋势且患者对氩氦刀技术的耐受性和反应性都较好。中医药在改善临床症状、减少放化疗的毒副作用和提高生活质量方面有较好的疗效;社会心理支持疗法在一定程度上可缓解NSCLC患者的困扰,但其系统性有待完善。姑息治疗的评估和介入时机,是患者能否从中获益的重要因素。文章介绍了老年NSCLC姑息治疗获益研究的进展,为老年NSCLC的姑息治疗提供依据。
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shantong Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Integration Medicine and
Geriatric Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Pingping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Integration Medicine and
Geriatric Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|