Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin versus josamycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with bacterial pneumonia

Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections in children worldwide. Most of our understanding of hospital-acquired pneumonia in children is derived from adult studies. To our knowledge, no systematic review with meta-analysis has assessed the benefits and harms of different antibiotic regimens in neonates and children with hospital-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two trial registers to February 2021, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing one antibiotic regimen with any other antibiotic regimen for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events; our secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, pneumonia-related mortality, non-serious adverse events, and treatment failure. Our primary time point of interest was at maximum follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four randomised clinical trials (84 participants). We assessed all trials as having high risk of bias. We did not conduct any meta-analyses, as the included trials did not compare similar antibiotic regimens. Each of the four trials assessed a different comparison, as follows: cefepime versus ceftazidime; linezolid versus vancomycin; meropenem versus cefotaxime; and ceftobiprole versus cephalosporin. Only one trial reported our primary outcomes of all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Three trials reported our secondary outcome of treatment failure. Two trials primarily included community-acquired pneumonia and hospitalised children with bacterial infections, hence the children with hospital-acquired pneumonia constituted subgroups of the total sample sizes. Where outcomes were reported, the certainty of the evidence was very low for each of the comparisons. We are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. None of the included trials assessed health-related quality of life, pneumonia-related mortality, or non-serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The relative beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens remain unclear due to the very low certainty of the available evidence. The current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. Randomised clinical trials assessing different antibiotic regimens for hospital-acquired pneumonia in children and neonates are warranted.

Burden of pneumococcal disease among adults in Southern Europe (Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Greece): a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim was to summarize pneumococcal disease burden data among adults in Southern Europe and the potential impact of vaccines on epidemiology. Of 4779 identified studies, 272 were selected. Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence was 15.08 (95% CI 11.01-20.65) in Spain versus 2.56 (95% CI 1.54-4.24) per 100,000 population in Italy. Pneumococcal pneumonia incidence was 19.59 (95% CI 10.74-35.74) in Spain versus 2.19 (95% CI 1.36-3.54) per 100,000 population in Italy. Analysis of IPD incidence in Spain comparing pre-and post- PCV7 and PCV13 periods unveiled a declining trend in vaccine-type IPD incidence (larger and statistically significant for the elderly), suggesting indirect effects of childhood vaccination programme. Data from Portugal, Greece and, to a lesser extent, Italy were sparse, thus improved surveillance is needed. Pneumococcal vaccination uptake, particularly among the elderly and adults with chronic and immunosuppressing conditions, should be improved, including shift to a higher-valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when available.

Review and comparison of advanced-generation macrolides clarithromycin and dirithromycin

We reviewed English-language clinical studies, abstracts, and review articles identified from MEDLINE searches from January 1966-August 1998, and bibliographies of identified articles to compare advanced-generation macrolides dirithromycin and clarithromycin and their use for respiratory tract infections. Both agents have superior adverse effect profiles compared with erythromycin, the original macrolide. Both have broad antibacterial coverage, but clarithromycin usually has a lower MIC90 to susceptible organisms than dirithromycin; for most isolates this difference is not clinically significant. Clarithromycin has better in vitro coverage of Haemophilus influenzae, but this activity varies with formation of its bioactive metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. Neither agent is ideal for H. influenzae eradication. The agents differ markedly in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolism, and cost, and thus with respect to drug interaction profiles and dosages. Dirithromycin's drug interaction profile is markedly better than clarithromycin's. Clarithromycin is dosed twice/day; dirithromycin's pharmacokinetics allow once/day dosing. Dirithromycin is less expensive with regard to both cost/day and cost/treatment regimen. Clarithromycin has been studied and approved for administration to children. In adults with respiratory tract infections who are receiving drugs that would interact with clarithromycin, and in those with renal dysfunction with or without coexisting hepatic dysfunction, dirithromycin appears to be superior in terms of safety and equivalent to clarithromycin in terms of efficacy.

Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients

Clarithromycin is a broad spectrum macrolide antibacterial agent active in vitro and effective in vivo against the major pathogens responsible for respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients. It is highly active in vitro against pathogens causing atypical pneumonia (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella spp.) and has similar activity to other macrolides against Staphylococcus aureus. Streptococcus pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae is susceptible or intermediately susceptible to clarithromycin alone, but activity is enhanced when the parent drug and metabolite are combined in vitro. Absorption of clarithromycin is unaffected by food. More than half of an oral dose is systemically available as the parent drug and the active 14-hydroxy metabolite. Pharmacokinetics are nonlinear, with plasma concentrations increasing in more than proportion to the dosage. First-pass metabolism results in the rapid appearance of the active metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin in plasma. Clarithromycin and its active metabolite are found in greater concentrations in the tissues and fluids of the respiratory tract than in plasma. Dosage adjustments are required for patients with severe renal failure, but not for elderly patients or those with hepatic impairment. Drug interactions related to the cytochrome P450 system may occur with clarithromycin use. In addition to the standard immediate-release formulation for administration twice daily, a modified-release formulation of clarithromycin is now available for use once daily. In dosages of 500 to 1000 mg/day for 5 to 14 days, clarithromycin was as effective in the treatment of community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections in hospital and community settings as beta-lactam agents (with or without a beta-lactamase inhibitor), cephalosporins and most other macrolides. Clarithromycin was similar in efficacy to azithromycin in comparative studies and is as effective as and better tolerated than erythromycin. Adverse events are primarily gastrointestinal in nature, but result in fewer withdrawals from therapy than are seen with erythromycin. Clarithromycin provides similar clinical and bacteriological efficacy to that seen with beta-lactam agents, cephalosporins and other macrolides. It offers a cost-saving alternative to intravenous erythromycin use in US hospitals and is available in both once-daily and twice-daily formulations. The spectrum of activity of clarithromycin against common and emerging respiratory tract pathogens may make it suitable for use in the community as empirical therapy of respiratory tract infections in both children and adults.

Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin compared to cefixime as outpatient treatment of lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin is a new acid-stable, 14-membered macrolide active against many of the organisms responsible for lower respiratory tract infections. It has been administered to over 5,000 patients worldwide and has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and bacterial pneumonia when given twice daily (250 to 500 mg). Cefixime is an amino-thiazolyl cephalosporin with an extended spectrum of antibacterial activity inhibiting beta-lactamase-producing respiratory pathogens. It has a long half-life, allowing once-daily administration.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind multicenter study compared clarithromycin and cefixime as treatment for patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (n = 213). Patients had bacterial pneumonia (clarithromycin, 19 percent; cefixime, 21 percent) or acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis or asthmatic bronchitis (clarithromycin, 81 percent; cefixime, 79 percent). Patients received 500 mg of clarithromycin twice daily (n = 103) or 400 mg of cefixime once daily (n = 110) for 7 to 14 days.

RESULTS

Clinical cure or improvement occurred in 86 percent of the clarithromycin-treated patients and 88 percent of the cefixime-treated patients. When only patients with identified infections with Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, or Streptococcus pneumoniae were considered, clinical success rates were 97 percent for clarithromycin and 96 percent for cefixime; the rate of bacteriologic eradication was 91 percent for clarithromycin and 90 percent for cefixime. Adverse events occurred in 29 percent of the clarithromycin-treated patients and 23 percent of the cefixime-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that clarithromycin and cefixime are effective treatments for pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbations of bronchitis of mild to moderate severity caused by the most common infecting organisms.

Clarithromycin clinical pharmacokinetics

Clarithromycin is a semisynthetic macrolide antibiotic, structurally related to erythromycin. It has a more favourable pharmacokinetic profile than erythromycin, thus allowing twice-daily administration and possibly increasing compliance among outpatients. Clarithromycin is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and its systemic bioavailability (about 55%) is reduced because of first-pass metabolism. It undergoes rapid biodegradation to produce the microbiologically active 14-hydroxy-(R)-metabolite. The maximum serum concentrations of clarithromycin and its 14-hydroxy metabolite, following single oral doses, are dose proportional and appear within 3 hours. With multiple doses, steady-state concentrations are attained after 5 doses and the maximal serum concentrations of clarithromycin and of the 14-hydroxy derivative appear within 2 hours after the last dose. Clarithromycin is well distributed throughout the body and achieves higher concentrations in tissues than in the blood. Also, the 14-hydroxy metabolite exhibits high tissue concentrations, with values about one-third of the parent compound concentrations. The presence of food appears to have no clinically significant effect on clarithromycin pharmacokinetics. The main metabolic pathways are oxidative N-demethylation and hydroxylation, which are saturable and result in nonlinear pharmacokinetics. The primary metabolite (14-hydroxy derivative) is mainly excreted in the urine with the parent compound. A reduction in urinary clearance in the elderly and in patients with renal impairment is associated with an increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve, peak plasma concentrations and elimination half-life. Mild hepatic impairment does not significantly modify clarithromycin pharmacokinetics. In conclusion, clarithromycin, because of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, appears to be a useful alternative to other macrolides in the treatment of community acquired infections.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin, a new macrolide antimicrobial

The pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and its active 14(R)-hydroxy metabolite were evaluated after single and multiple oral doses of 250 and 500 mg of clarithromycin. Multiple-dose regimens used 12-hour dosing intervals for 7 doses. Plasma and urine concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Appearance of clarithromycin and its metabolite in plasma were rapid, as reflected by mean times to maximum plasma concentration ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 and 1.8 to 2.9 hours, respectively. The rises in clarithromycin peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) were disproportionate to increase in dose, suggesting nonlinearity in parent compound pharmacokinetics. Clarithromycin terminal disposition half-life (t1/2) also exhibited dose dependency, ranging from harmonic means of 2.7 to 4.8 hours. In contrast, based on Cmax AUC, and predicted/observed accumulation ratios, nonlinearity in metabolite pharmacokinetics was not observed. Plasma accumulation of metabolite occurred to a much lesser degree than that of the parent compound despite a substantially longer t1/2 for the metabolite (metabolite accumulation ratios based on AUC dose 7/AUC dose 1:250-mg regimen = 1.03 +/- 0.33, 500-mg regimen = 0.81 +/- 0.29, parent accumulation ratios: 250-mg regimen = 1.64 +/- 0.47, 500-mg regimen = 1.65 +/- 0.69). This would suggest that formation of this metabolite is capacity-limited and that this may in part account for the nonlinearity observed in clarithromycin pharmacokinetics. Urinary excretion constituted a relatively important route of elimination of clarithromycin, with renal clearance accounting for 17 to 31% of apparent total body clearance.

Clarithromycin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections: two multicenter clinical studies. Clarithromycin Study Group

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin is a new macrolide analog of erythromycin with activity against a number of dermatologic pathogens.

METHODS

The efficacy and safety of clarithromycin, 250 mg bid, were compared with those of reference drugs, cefadroxil and erythromycin, in two multicenter studies: (1) a randomized, double-blind 45-center study, in which clarithromycin or cefadroxil 500 mg bid was given for 5-14 days; and (2) a single-blind 31-center study, in which clarithromycin or erythromycin, 250 mg qid, was given for < or = 14 days.

RESULTS

In the first study, efficacy and safety were evaluated in 299 and 538 patients, respectively. In the second study, the numbers were 141 and 261 patients, respectively. Overall, clarithromycin was as effective and safe as cefadroxil and erythromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin provides an alternative therapy to cefadroxil and erythromycin for skin and skin structure infections, especially in beta-lactam allergic patients.

Effect of moderate or severe hepatic impairment on clarithromycin pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of clarithromycin (C) and its 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin (HC) metabolite were determined after a multiple-dose oral clarithromycin regimen (250 mg twice daily for five doses) in six healthy subjects and seven patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Pugh grades B and C). Plasma and urine C and HC concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Hepatic impairment resulted in increased harmonic mean C terminal disposition half-life and mean +/- SD C renal clearance (CLR) compared with normal volunteers (5.0 vs. 3.3 hr and 170 +/- 69 vs. 111 +/- 17 mL/min, respectively). Hepatic impairment also resulted in decreased metabolite peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve and decreased metabolite/parent concentration ratios compared with normal volunteers. These data suggest that 14-hydroxylation of C was reduced by moderate to severe hepatic impairment. No adverse events were noted in either study group and there were no study-related clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters. The decrease in C metabolic clearance appears to be partially offset by an increase in C CLR, resulting in comparable steady-state concentrations of parent drug. In those indications in which the metabolite may be a necessary element of the antimicrobial activity of C, it would seem prudent to be cautious in using C in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment due to reduced production of HC. Otherwise, no dosage adjustment for C appears necessary for subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment provided that renal function is not impaired.

Clarithromycin pharmacokinetics in healthy young and elderly volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and its active 14(R)-hydroxy metabolite were assessed in 12 healthy young and 12 healthy elderly volunteers after oral administration of a multiple dose regimen of oral clarithromycin (500 mg every 12 hours for 5 doses). Plasma and urine clarithromycin and 14(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. The elderly subjects exhibited significantly elevated clarithromycin peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with young subjects. In addition, the elderly group exhibited a significantly reduced apparent total body clearance (300 +/- 97 versus 476 +/- 112 mL/min, respectively) and renal clearance (CLR) (84 +/- 31 versus 168 +/- 35 mL/min, respectively). Similar results were noted for the 14(R)-hydroxy metabolite, with significantly elevated Cmax, Cmin, and AUC and reduced CLR in the elderly compared with the young group. Because the differences in parent and metabolite pharmacokinetic parameters were small and the increase in circulating drug concentrations was well tolerated (no increase in incidence or severity of adverse events), adjustments in clarithromycin dosing regimens may not be necessary solely on the basis of age.

Clarithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Clarithromycin is an acid-stable orally administered macrolide antimicrobial drug, structurally related to erythromycin. It has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, similar to that of erythromycin and inhibits a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, atypical pathogens and some anaerobes. Significantly, clarithromycin demonstrates greater in vitro activity than erythromycin against certain pathogens including Bacteroides melaninogenicus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycobacterium chelonae subspecies--chelonae and--abscessus, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium marinum, Mycobacterium avium complex, Legionella spp. and, when combined with its 14-hydroxy metabolite, against Haemophilus influenzae. However, bacterial strains resistant to erythromycin are also generally resistant to clarithromycin. The antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin appears to be enhanced by the formation in vivo of the microbiologically active 14-hydroxy metabolite. In combination, additive or synergistic activity against a variety of pathogens including Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Legionella species (principally Legionella pneumophila) and various staphylococci and streptococci has been demonstrated. Clarithromycin has a superior pharmacokinetic profile to that of erythromycin, allowing the benefits of twice daily administration with the potential for increased compliance among outpatients where a more frequent regimen for erythromycin might otherwise be indicated. The clinical efficacy of clarithromycin has been confirmed in the treatment of infections of the lower and upper respiratory tracts (including those associated with atypical pathogens), skin/soft tissues, and in paediatrics. Clarithromycin was as effective as erythromycin and other appropriate drugs including beta-lactams (penicillins and cephalosporins) in some of the above infections. A most promising indication for clarithromycin appears to be in the treatment of immunocompromised patients infected with M. avium complex, M. chelonae sp. and Toxoplasma sp. Small initial trials in this setting reveal clarithromycin alone or in combination with other antimicrobials to be effective in the eradication or amelioration of these infections. Noncomparative studies have provided preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of clarithromycin in the treatment of infections of the urogenital tract, oromaxillofacial and ophthalmic areas. However, the promising in vitro and preliminary in vivo activity of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium leprae and Helicobacter pylori warrant further clinical trials to assess its efficacy in patients with these infections. Despite the improved pharmacokinetic profile and in vitro antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin over erythromycin, comparative studies of patients with community-acquired infections reveal the 2 drugs to be of equivalent efficacy. However, clarithromycin demonstrates greater tolerability, principally by inducing fewer gastrointestinal disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparative safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and ampicillin in the treatment of out-patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

In an open, randomized trial, adult non-hospitalized patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were treated with 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily (n = 53) or 500 mg ampicillin four times daily (n = 50). Causative pathogens included S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis, H. influenzae, H. parainfluenzae and S. aureus. For clinically evaluable patients, successful outcome (cure or improvement) was noted for 53/53 (100%) clarithromycin-treated patients and 46/47 (98%) ampicillin-treated patients. Clinically significant improvement in signs and symptoms was comparable between treatment groups. There was 100% bacteriological eradication in both treatment groups. Eight patients (15%) in the clarithromycin group and 10 patients (20%) in the ampicillin group reported adverse events, the majority of which were mild or moderate in severity; six events in each treatment group were digestive-system disorders. The new macrolide, clarithromycin, appears to be effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

Drug-food interaction potential of clarithromycin, a new macrolide antimicrobial

To evaluate the effect of food on bioavailability, clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (active metabolite) pharmacokinetics were assessed in 26 healthy adult volunteers after ingestion of a single oral 500-mg dose of clarithromycin in a fasting state (2 hours before breakfast after an overnight fast) and a nonfasting state (0.5 hours after the start of breakfast). Clarithromycin and 14-hydroxy metabolite plasma concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic technique. Food intake immediately before dosing increased the extent of absorption from the 500-mg tablet formulation by approximately 25%. The mean increase in metabolite area under the plasma concentration-time curve was approximately 9%. These results suggest that clarithromycin can be taken without regard to timing in relation to meals.

Clarithromycin, a unique macrolide. A pharmacokinetic, microbiological, and clinical overview

The in vitro and in vivo spectrum of antibacterial activity of clarithromycin is summarized and related to its human pharmacokinetics. In vitro studies by several investigators have documented clarithromycin's activity against bacterial agents of respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and sexually transmitted diseases. Clinical cure rates of 52%-83% (pneumonia), 79%-96% (bronchitis), 82%-96% (pharyngitis), 58% (sinusitis), and 78% (skin/skin-structure infections) have been reported in patients receiving clarithromycin in comparative trials. Respective bacteriologic eradication rates in clarithromycin recipients have been reported as 57%-89%, 79%-96%, 88%-100%, 89%, and 90%. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that clarithromycin, when combined with its major human metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, is also effective against Haemophilus influenzae. A New Drug Application claiming efficacy in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, pharyngitis, and skin and skin-structure infections caused by susceptible pathogens has been filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This review summarizes relevant pharmacokinetic, microbiological, and clinical data for clarithromycin.