De Gramont Schedule is a Very Low Toxic and Effective Regimen in Low Performance Status Patients Affected by Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Preliminary Report

Five-year outcomes of a phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy (OGSG1002)

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy is standard of care for stage II and III gastric cancer (GC), but there is still a need to improve the efficacy of treatment for stage III disease. We conducted phase II study of eight cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) followed by S-1 monotherapy for up to 1 year after D2 gastrectomy for stage III GC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with stage III GC were enrolled. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m²/day) for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m²) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. Treatment safety, tolerability, and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The completion rate for eight cycles of DS therapy was 77.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.0-87.1%]. Subsequent S-1 monotherapy for 1 year was feasible in 71.0% (95% CI 58.1-81.8%) of patients. The incidence of neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia, and fatigue of grade 3 or higher was 10% or higher. There were no treatment-related deaths. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 72.4% (95% CI 62.1-84.5%) and 60.0% (95% CI 48.8-73.9%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by disease stage showed 5-year OS and DFS rates of 74.5% (95% CI 60.7-91.5%) and 59.3% (95% CI 43.8-80.2%) for stage IIIA and 70.0% (95% CI 55.4-88.5%) and 60.0% (95% CI 44.8-80.4%) for stage IIIB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant eight cycles of DS therapy might be safe and manageable and has promising OS and DFS for stage III GC.

An application study of low-dose computed tomography perfusion imaging for evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study used low-dose computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging technology to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and to determine whether any of the perfusion parameters could predict tumor response to chemotherapy.

METHODS

Forty patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (T3-4NxM0) received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and low-dose spiral CT perfusion imaging prior to and after the first and third series of chemotherapy. We calculated tissue blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV) using commercial software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect any significant variation of the tested parameters between different times of scanning. Spearman's test was used to evaluate the correlation among perfusion parameters, tumor size and pathological efficacy grade, and clinical response after chemotherapy, respectively. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff value for changes in perfusion parameters and tumor size.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in BF and BV values between those before and after chemotherapy (p < 0.01). The BF, BV and size reduction rate after three series of chemotherapy were significantly correlated with pathological efficacy grade. BF and BV values after the first and third series of chemotherapy were also significantly correlated with clinical response (p < 0.01, respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the BV reduction rate were higher than those of size reduction rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose CT perfusion imaging is a valuable tool that permits microcirculation evaluation and therefore can evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Whole Abdominal Irradiation for Gastric Carcinoma

Aims and Background

To analyze the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by whole abdominal irradiation in the treatment of resectable gastric cancer with positive lymph nodes.

Methods and Study Design

Between 1996 and 1999, 10 patients with node-positive gastric cancer underwent complete gross resection and were treated by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2/day as a 96-hr continuous infusion on day 1, and cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 2, every 21 days. Six courses were planned. Radiotherapy was administered 3 weeks after completion of the chemotherapy protocol as a single-fraction dose of 600 cGy in a two-field (anterior and posterior) configuration.

Results

Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths. However, 9 of the 10 patients died of recurrent disease, with a median survival of 20 months (range, 7–84).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy with whole abdominal irradiation for gastric cancer is safe and tolerable but has no apparent effect on patient outcome. Studies in larger series are needed to evaluate the role of the approach in this disease.

Adjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

D2 gastrectomy is now the globally accepted surgical standard for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, since 2000, different evidence has emerged regarding the efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiation, perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. This review summarizes the background, current status, and future perspectives of adjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. The Intergroup 0116 study was the first to show the significant overall survival benefits of adjuvant (chemoradiation) therapy for gastric cancer. The second study was the MAGIC trial, which showed the efficacy of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Although the findings from the Intergroup 0116 study and the MAGIC trial were positive, recent studies, such as the ARTIST and EORTC 40954 studies, found no survival benefit for patients who had undergone D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Regarding the adjuvant chemotherapy strategy, two pivotal phase III trials: the ACTS-GC and the CLASSIC, demonstrated the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following D2 gastrectomy. However, more intensive chemotherapy is necessary to improve the survival rate. Several studies have analyzed the effectiveness of molecular-targeted therapy against metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Further studies should focus on the survival benefit of more-intensive adjuvant therapy with D2 resection, or with concurrent molecular-targeted therapy.

A long non-coding RNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are frequently aberrantly expressed in cancers, however, few related lncRNA signatures have been established for prediction of cancer prognosis. We aimed at developing alncRNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Using a lncRNA-mining approach, we performed lncRNA expression profiling in large GC cohorts from Gene Expression Ominus (GEO), including GSE62254 data set (N = 300) and GSE15459 data set (N = 192). We established a set of 24-lncRNAs that were significantly associated with the disease free survival (DFS) in the test series.

RESULTS

Based on this 24-lncRNA signature, the test series patients could be classified into high-risk or low-risk subgroup with significantly different DFS (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI = 1.13-1.25, P < 0.0001). The prognostic value of this 24-lncRNA signature was confirmed in the internal validation series and another external validation series, respectively. Further analysis revealed that the prognostic value of this signature was independent of lymph node ratio (LNR) and postoperative chemotherapy. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that high risk score group was associated with several cancer recurrence and metastasis associated pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of the prognostic lncRNAs indicates the potential roles of lncRNAs in GC biogenesis. Our results may provide an efficient classification tool for clinical prognosis evaluation of GC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review up-to-date clinical data published in the literature in regard to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer after radical surgical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and CBMDisc were searched to identify data published regarding this issue from 1966 to 2013. All the calculations and statistical tests were done using RevMan5.2 software.

RESULTS

A total of 29 trials with 8580 patients met all inclusion criteria. Among them, 27 studies reported survival rates at the end of follow-ups, 64.2% alive among 3981 patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm and 57.3% alive among 4027 patients in the observation arm. Statistical results showed that the observation arm had a shorter disease-free survival (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15), and the treatment arm had a lower recurrence rate (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.84). Leucopenia, anemia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia and infection occurred more frequently in the treatment arm. Adjuvant chemotherapy decreased the occurrence of peritoneum relapse [RR = 0.77, 95% CI (0.66-0.90)], lymphoid nodes relapse [RR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.45-0.75)] and local relapse [RR = 0.57, 95% CI (0.41-0.80)].

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the survival rate and disease-free survival rate and reduce the relapse rate after curative resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot induce thrombocytopenia and mucositis or affect liver function. The tumor in situ recurrence and peritoneum, lymph nodes relapse decrease after chemotherapy, and patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of the numbers of positive lymph node, depth of local invasion, Asian or non-Asian, the length of follow-up, and numbers of cycles.

Three-year outcomes of a phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported the superior feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel in patients with stage III gastric cancer during a prospective phase II study. We report 3-year follow-up data on patients enrolled in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-three patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled into this study. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day) for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks (one cycle). Treatment was initiated within 45 days after surgery and repeated for four cycles, followed by S-1 monotherapy (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) until 1 year after surgery. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The OS rate at 3 years was 78.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 67.9-90.6 %] and the DFS rate at 3 years was 66.2 % (95 % CI, 54.4-80.7 %). Subgroup analyses according to disease stage showed a 3-year OS and DFS rate of 85.7 % (95 % CI, 74.9-98.1 %) and 70.8 % (95 % CI, 57.1-87.8 %) for stage IIIA, and 62.5 % (95 % CI, 42.8-91.4 %) and 56.2 % (95 % CI, 36.5-86.7 %) for stage IIIB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of 3-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 plus docetaxel yielded promising OS and DFS in stage IIIA gastric cancer patients who had undergone D2 gastrectomy. We believe that this regimen is a candidate for future phase III trials studying the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III gastric cancer.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

To improve outcome of resectable gastric cancer, several treatment strategies have been evaluated. These include adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy. The US Intergroup 0116 trial reported the benefit of postoperative chemoradiotherapy using 5-FU/leucovorin in a U.S. population. In this study, only 10 % of patients received D2 resection. For Korean patients after D2 resection, the ARTIST trial failed to show any benefit from adding radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of 3-year disease-free survival. The MAGIC trial compared perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone and reported a prolonged 5-year overall survival in the perioperative chemotherapy arm. In resectable gastric cancer, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone has been clearly demonstrated. After D2 dissection, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy improved the overall survival (ACTS-GC trial) and capecitabine/oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy improved 3-year disease-free survival (CLASSIC trial). To date, for resectable gastric cancer, the use of chemotherapy in addition to surgery is beneficial for the reduction of recurrence and to improve overall survival. The optimal sequence of chemotherapy and surgery, as well as optimal chemotherapeutic agents, should be further studied. In D2-resected gastric cancer, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy does not appear to provide any additional benefit.].

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with S-1

Background

The effectiveness of specific regimens of adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer has not been verified by large clinical trials. Recently, several large trials attempted to verify the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy. The Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of TS-1 for Gastric Cancer in Japan, a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant S-1 therapy for resected gastric cancer, demonstrated significant improvement in overall and relapse-free survival, compared to surgery alone. To evaluate value for money of S-1 therapy, cost-effective analysis was carried out.

Methods

The analysis was carried out from a payer’s perspective. As an economic measure, cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was estimated. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, up to 5-year observation. Beyond this period, it was simulated by the modified Boag model. Utility score is derived from interviews with sampled patients using a time trade-off method. Costs were estimated from trial data during observation, while in the period beyond observation they were estimated using simulation results. To explore uncertainty of the results, qualitative and stochastic sensitivity analyses were done.

Results

Adjuvant S-1 therapy gained 1.24 QALYs per patient and increased costs by $3,722 per patient for over lifetime (3% discount rate for both effect and costs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (95% confidence intervals) for over lifetime was estimated to be $3,016 ($1,441, $8,840) per QALY. The sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of these results.

Conclusion

Adjuvant S-1 therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer is likely cost-effective. This therapy can be accepted for wide use in Japan.

Chinese patients with gastric cancer need targeted adjuvant chemotherapy schemes

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers in China. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is a routine auxiliary treatment for GC recommended by the guidelines issued in 2011 by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China, but the relevant credible consequences in China have been insufficient because of China's late start and ethical concerns.

METHODS

A series of databases, including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Chinese database of the National Knowledge Infrastructure and the VIP database, were searched by 2 reviewers independently for studies investigating AC for GC through March 2012. The retrieved literature was screened according to the eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 35 randomized control trials (RCTs) were subjected to the final analysis, including 4,043 patients in treatment group and 3,884 in the control group, as well as 4 clinical-control trials (CCTs), which accessed the final analysis with 238 and 252 patients, respectively. AC reduced the risk of death as a protective treatment with statistical significance (HR=0.91, 95%CI: [0.85, 0.97], P=0.002), and it seemed more effective for Asian than non-Asian patients. The effects of AC were not influenced by the starting time (P>0.05). D2 lymphadenectomy-based chemotherapy was effective (HR=0.89, 95%CI: [0.80, 0.99], P=0.04). Oral S-1 40 mg/m2 after D2 lymphadenectomy might be a better choice for Asians with advanced GC and might result in a greater reduction of adverse events than in non-Asian patients. GRADE quality assessment determined that the strength of the evidence from foreign studies from Europe, the United States and Asian countries other than China was high, while it was moderate for Chinese studies.

CONCLUSION

AC was effective or even curative in Chinese patients in general, although it is still necessary to optimize a targeted AC scheme for Chinese patients with GC.

ERCC1 predicts outcome in patients with gastric cancer treated with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is gaining an increasing role in resectable gastric cancer. Customizing chemotherapy on the basis of chemosensitivity may improve outcome, and putative predictive molecular markers have been mostly evaluated in Asian patients. We profiled key DNA and damage signaling factors and correlated them with outcome, in a European cohort.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed tumor samples obtained from surgical specimens of patients treated with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for gastric cancer were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to analyze excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression, and p53 mutations were detected with direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Among the 68 patient recruited, the median age was 69 (range 30-74), and UICC stage was III in 44 patients (65 %). With a median follow-up of 40.5 months, disease-free and overall survival were 18.0 (95 % CI 13.4-22.76) and 56 months (95 % CI 44.87-67.13), respectively. ERCC1 score was 0 in 14 out 67 (21 %) cases, 1 in 19 (28 %), 2 in 20 (30 %) and 3 in 14 cases (21 %). Longer overall survival (p = 0.04) was found in patients categorized as ERCC1 negative by IHC according to median score. TS score was 0 in 16 out 67 (24 %) cases, 1 in 27 (40 %), 2 in 16 (24 %) and 3 in 8 cases (12 %). Mutations of p53 were found in 21 out 66 (32 %) cases. Neither TS nor p53 were found to correlate with outcome.

CONCLUSION

Excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 by IHC might predict patients more likely to benefit from adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in curatively resected gastric cancer. In patients exhibiting ERCC1 positive tumors, alternative regimens should be evaluated.

Selecting the best treatment for an individual patient

Several factors concur in determining outcome for locally advanced gastric cancer patients. Shockingly, geographic origin of the patient seems to play a major role. In Eastern countries, the high level of surgery that can be expected grants a high percentage of success in a strategy that employs surgery as immediate treatment followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly based on oral fluoropyrimidines (S-1 or Capecitabine), with satisfactory results. In Western countries, the expertise of the surgeon maintains its role as predictor of high likelihood of cure. Indeed, patients treated with standard D2 lymph node dissection have a significantly better survival than those who do not obtain the same kind of treatment. For patients who underwent a suboptimal resection (less than a D1) the classical indication is for a combined adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In patients who obtain a good surgical outcome, the benefit of the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy is still debatable: the gain in survival seems to be small (around 8 % at 5 years) and with noticeable toxicities (usually with dismal compliance for patients treated). On this basis, neoadjuvant treatment is a promising option even if there is a general lack of conclusive data regarding which is the best regimen to use. Even with the limitation of a small number of studies (with difficulties in enrollment), neoadjuvant chemotherapy is usually feasible, allows for a greater chance of receiving chemotherapy at all, and opens the possibility of a downstaging and downsizing of the tumor, allowing an easier surgery. Regarding this strategy preliminary results have also been presented about the addition of monoclonal antibodies. For example, in the TOGA trial, a significant benefit in terms of overall survival, response rate, and progression free survival was observed also for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and not just for the metastatic ones. In the AVAGAST trial also, the addition of Bevacizumab failed to determine a significant improvement in the primary outcome, overall survival, for patients treated with the combination, but in the subgroup analysis, patients with locally advanced gastric cancer had a significantly better overall survival and response rate. This data was the basis for the newest neoadjuvant trial, of Cunningham et al., the MAGIC2 trial, with the peri-operative use of ECX+Bevacizumab. Finally, an increasing interest in the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in other types of solid tumors (including those of the gastrointestinal tract such as colon cancer) has led to evaluate this treatment modality in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal involvement. It should be noted that it is still to be considered an experimental approach, even though it would be intriguing to evaluate if a particular subset of patients, those who are more likely to develop peritoneal metastasis, may benefit from this technique in the adjuvant setting. It should be considered that other than histologic subtype (diffuse vs intestinal) there seems to be a series of polymorphisms of genes usually involved in cell interaction and migration that can explain a different metastatic pattern in resected patients. Further research on these determinants of metastatic spread could be used to select those patients who may benefit from HIPEC and those who may benefit from standard adjuvant or that gain no benefit at all.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan: a standing position by comparing with adjuvant chemotherapy

Adjuvant chemotherapy aims to eradicate micrometastatic tumor cells before and after curative surgery. Many Phase III trials have been conducted to study the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; however, most trials have failed to show any survival benefit because of their low statistical power and/or poor patient compliance. Since 2000, two pivotal Phase III trials, the ACTS-GC and the CLASSIC, have demonstrated the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following D2 gastrectomy. Although treatment with S-1 for 1 year or combination therapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for 6 months is effective, more intensive chemotherapy is necessary to further improve the survival rates. In Europe, two Phase III trials, the MAGIC and the FNCLCC/FFCD, have produced results that strongly suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial. The advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy include a high rate of R0 resection, tumor regression, high compliance and the avoidance of unnecessary surgery. The disadvantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is over-diagnosis. In Japan, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group has conducted several clinical trials using neoadjuvant chemotherapy to target extensive nodal disease and/or scirrhous carcinomas. The optimal courses and regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy should, therefore, be clarified in the future.

Bimonthly regimen of high-dose leucovorin, infusional 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cisplatin (modified ECF) as adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The administration of the de Gramont regimen in combination with cisplatin and epirubicin (modified ECF) has previously been reported as a treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but here we report this regimen combination in an adjuvant setting for the first time.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with curatively resected gastric cancer were treated. Each 2-week cycle consisted of epirubicin (50 mg/m(2)), cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) IV bolus (400 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU IV (2,400 mg/m(2)) over 46 h plus leucovorin IV (400 mg/m(2)) over 2 h. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was also administered to the patients when indicated. We retrospectively reviewed the patients who were treated with modified ECF.

RESULTS

The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 40.7 months and the 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 78.5, 55.7 and 44.6%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematological and gastrointestinal.

CONCLUSION

A modified ECF regimen may be an effective and convenient treatment with tolerable toxicities for the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer. It may provide an alternative regimen to the standard ECF when a continuous ambulatory infusion pump is not feasible or not preferred by the patient.

Treatment of resectable gastric cancer

Stomach cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, despite its declining overall incidence. Although there are differences in incidence, etiology and pathological factors, most studies do not separately analyze cardia and noncardia gastric cancer. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for advanced, resectable gastric cancer, but locoregional relapse rate is high with a consequently poor prognosis. To improve survival, several preoperative and postoperative treatment strategies have been investigated. Whereas perioperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiation (CRT) are considered standard therapy in the Western world, in Asia postoperative monochemotherapy with S-1 is often used. Several other therapeutic options, although generally not accepted as standard treatment, are postoperative combination chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy and CRT. Postoperative combination chemotherapy does show a statistically significant but clinically equivocal survival advantage in several meta-analyses. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is mainly performed in Asia and is associated with a higher postoperative complication rate. Based on the currently available data, the use of postoperative radiotherapy alone and the use of intraoperative radiotherapy should not be advised in the treatment of resectable gastric cancer. Western randomized trials on gastric cancer are often hampered by slow or incomplete accrual. Reduction of toxicity for preoperative and especially postoperative treatment is essential for the ongoing improvement of gastric cancer care.

Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial

PURPOSE

The ARTIST (Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy in Stomach Cancer) trial was the first study to our knowledge to investigate the role of postoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection. This trial was designed to compare postoperative treatment with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus XP plus radiotherapy with capecitabine (XP/XRT/XP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The XP arm received six cycles of XP (capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks) chemotherapy. The XP/XRT/XP arm received two cycles of XP followed by 45-Gy XRT (capecitabine 1,650 mg/m2 per day for 5 weeks) and two cycles of XP.

RESULTS

Of 458 patients, 228 were randomly assigned to the XP arm and 230 to the XP/XRT/XP arm. Treatment was completed as planned by 75.4% of patients (172 of 228) in the XP arm and 81.7% (188 of 230) in the XP/XRT/XP arm. Overall, the addition of XRT to XP chemotherapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0862). However, in the subgroup of patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis at the time of surgery (n = 396), patients randomly assigned to the XP/XRT/XP arm experienced superior DFS when compared with those who received XP alone (P = .0365), and the statistical significance was retained at multivariate analysis (estimated hazard ratio, 0.6865; 95% CI, 0.4735 to 0.9952; P = .0471). CONCLUSION The addition of XRT to XP chemotherapy did not significantly reduce recurrence after curative resection and D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. A subsequent trial (ARTIST-II) in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer is planned.

Five-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Versus Surgery Alone in Stage II or III Gastric Cancer

Purpose

The first planned interim analysis (median follow-up, 3 years) of the Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer confirmed that the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1 significantly improved overall survival, the primary end point. The results were therefore opened at the recommendation of an independent data and safety monitoring committee. We report 5-year follow-up data on patients enrolled onto the ACTS-GC study.

Patients and Methods

Patients with histologically confirmed stage II or III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 after surgery or surgery only. S-1 (80 to 120 mg per day) was given for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. This 6-week cycle was repeated for 1 year. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were relapse-free survival and safety.

Results

The overall survival rate at 5 years was 71.7% in the S-1 group and 61.1% in the surgery-only group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.669; 95% CI, 0.540 to 0.828). The relapse-free survival rate at 5 years was 65.4% in the S-1 group and 53.1% in the surgery-only group (HR, 0.653; 95% CI, 0.537 to 0.793). Subgroup analyses according to principal demographic factors such as sex, age, disease stage, and histologic type showed no interaction between treatment and any characteristic.

Conclusion

On the basis of 5-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 was confirmed to improve overall survival and relapse-free survival in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer who had undergone D2 gastrectomy.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy or by surgery and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS)

Background

Radical surgery is the cornerstone in the treatment of resectable gastric cancer. The Intergroup 0116 and MAGIC trials have shown benefit of postoperative chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy, respectively. Since these trials cannot be compared directly, both regimens are evaluated prospectively in the CRITICS trial. This study aims to obtain an improved overall survival for patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery by incorporating radiotherapy concurrently with chemotherapy postoperatively.

Methods/design

In this phase III multicentre study, patients with resectable gastric cancer are treated with three cycles of preoperative ECC (epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine), followed by surgery with adequate lymph node dissection, and then either another three cycles of ECC or concurrent chemoradiation (45 Gy, cisplatin and capecitabine). Surgical, pathological, and radiotherapeutic quality control is performed. The primary endpoint is overall survival, secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), prediction of response, and recurrence risk assessed by genomic and expression profiling. Accrual for the CRITICS trial is from the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark, and more countries are invited to participate.

Conclusion

Results of this study will demonstrate whether the combination of preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy will improve the clinical outcome of the current European standard of perioperative chemotherapy, and will therefore play a key role in the future management of patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov NCT00407186

Postoperative intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine added to chemoradiation in patients curatively resected (R0) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Chemoradiation after surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer improves overall and relapse-free survival compared with observation. However, locoregional recurrences remain high. Accordingly, we instituted this pilot/feasibility study, including intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (IP FUDR) as part of the treatment.

METHODS

Gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma stage Ib-IV (M0) patients who underwent R(0) resection were eligible and had IP catheters inserted at time of surgery. IP FUDR (3 g/dose/day) was given during study days 1-3 and 15-17 before combined 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and external beam radiation (45 Gy). Endpoints included toxicity, completion rate, locoregional recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (22 men) were enrolled from 2002-2006 at two institutions; their median age was 59.5 years. After R(0) resection, a median 22 (range, 8-102) lymph nodes were examined, and 22 patients had positive nodes. AJCC stages were IB (n = 8), II (n = 10), IIIA (n = 5), IIIB (n = 1), and IV (n = 4). Full-dose IP FUDR and chemoradiation treatment was completed in 20 and 25 patients, respectively. At nearly 4-year median follow-up, 11 patients were disease-free, 5 were alive with disease, 7 were dead of disease, and 1 was dead from other cause; 4 have been lost to follow-up. Recurrences were local in one, intra-abdominal in six, distant in two, multiple sites in two, and unknown in one. The median relapse-free survival is 65.3 months, and the median overall survival has not yet been reached.

CONCLUSIONS

IP FUDR before chemoradiation after R(0) gastric cancer resection is well tolerated without compromising completion of postoperative adjuvant treatment. Larger randomized trials studying IP FUDR as part of gastric cancer multidisciplinary treatment are needed to prove efficacy in reducing regional recurrence and improving survival.

Adjuvant chemoradiation for resected gastric cancer: a 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

The Intergroup 0116 study demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiation improved overall survival (OS) in resected gastric cancer. However, there are few reports focusing on late toxicity and factors governing prognosis. This study aimed to determine these two important aspects for employing this regimen.

METHODS

Patients with resected gastric cancer stage IB to IV (M0) disease, treated between July 1998 and December 2007, were analyzed. The majority of the patients were treated using 5 cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin chemotherapy with 45 Gy/25 fractions radiotherapy concurrent with cycles 2 and 3, as per the Intergroup 0116 study.

RESULTS

We treated 120 patients (107 standard protocol, 13 with concurrent 5FU alone), and 14% had a close or positive margin. Median age was 59 years (35-79 years). Acute toxicity ≥ grade 3 was seen in 66% of all patients (hematological 61%, stomatitis 3%, diarrhea 6%, vomiting 2%). Median follow-up was 33 months (range 6-125 months). Five-year OS and relapse-free survival were 51 and 54%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, surgical margin status, stage of the disease, and radiotherapy with computed tomography (CT) planning were important prognostic factors. Anemia and gastritis were the two most frequently occurring late complications, though they were usually mild and asymptomatic. Clinically significant renal impairment was uncommon. Other rare complications included intestinal obstruction, malabsorption, hypertension, and secondary malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative chemoradiation is safe and late toxicity is usually mild in extent. Results were comparable to the Intergroup 0116 study. R0 resection is of utmost importance and radiotherapy should best be delivered by conformal techniques.

Multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of gastric cancer has been rapidly evolving with the emergence of new cytotoxic drugs and targeted biologic agents. The purpose of this review is to provide an update in the treatment of localized and metastatic gastric cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the overall incidence of gastric cancer has been declining in the United States, the disease continues to be a devastating problem worldwide. Complete surgical resection offers the chance of cure for localized gastric cancer. However, local and distant recurrences are common. Adjuvant chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin significantly improves disease-free survival and overall survival as demonstrated by the US Intergroup INT-116 study. Most recently, the UK Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric trial showed survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation have also been explored in several small randomized studies with encouraging results. However, this approach needs to be further confirmed in a large randomized phase III study. Finally, novel molecular targeting agents have been incorporated into the multimodality treatment and shown promising response rate and progression-free survival.

SUMMARY

Gastric cancer remains one of the most clinically challenging cancers among all gastrointestinal malignancies. Mutimodality approach clearly offers survival benefit over surgery alone. In the United States, preoperative chemoradiation or postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation is widely practiced in major centers.

Novel perspectives for the treatment of gastric cancer: from a global approach to a personalized strategy

Although recent advances have been made, surgery still remains the mainstay of any curative treatment for gastric cancer patients, with radical gastrectomy representing the procedure of choice. However, patients with locally advanced disease show high rates of locoregional or distant recurrence even after potentially curative resections. According to global results presented in the setting of locally advanced resectable gastric carcinoma, perioperative chemotherapy may be considered a valuable option. On the other hand, clinical trials for advanced gastric cancer seem to suggest that a limit in efficacy has been reached for standard chemotherapy. Interesting data are expected from the development of targeted agents that, similarly to other cancer sites, showed appealing results in gastric cancer as well. Along with new effective therapeutic opportunities, better clinical and molecularly driven patient selection will represent the cornerstone of the global care for these patients.

Recommendations on current approach to gastric cancer

The management of gastric cancer has been updated by the Grupo Español de Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos (TTD). A multidisciplinary approach is essential in these patients including a precise diagnosis and staging and correct nutritional evaluation. For resectable disease, surgical resection remains the treatment mainstay and both perioperatory chemotherapy and postoperatory chemo-radiotherapy are considered standard complementary treatments. In advanced disease chemotherapy should always be considered. There are different reference schemes (TCF, XC, ECF, EXC) and the therapeutic option has to be individualised. Recently a phase III trial has shown a significant improvement in overall survival when trastuzumab is added to cisplatin-capecitabine or cisplatin-5-fluorouracil in patients with HER2+ advanced gastric cancer. Currently, there are several ongoing clinical trials evaluating the role of other new drugs against cellular targets. It would be desirable to incorporate biomarker studies in these trials in order to identify the best treatment for each patient.

Expression of thymidylate synthase determines the response of gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy to 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

We investigated whether the intensity of thymidylate synthase (TS) staining in tissue samples obtained from gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing gastrectomy could predict response to 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Clinicopathological features of 124 patients with histologically proven GC who underwent radical gastrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue samples obtained from these patients were immunohistochemically stained for assessing TS expression. We arbitrarily classified the TS staining results as low (<20% cytoplasmic immunostaining) and high (> or =20% cytoplasmic immunostaining) TS expression.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological features of the low TS expression group patients were typically similar to those of the high TS expression group patients. However, multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that low TS expression was independently associated with females and responders to 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up duration for the 124 GC patients who had undergone curative resection was 41.3 months. The GC patients who showed poor tumor differentiation and high TS expression had short disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSIONS

Low TS expression is significantly associated with female GC patients and responders to 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. It predicts longer DFS and OS in selected GC patients treated with 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection. The results suggest that prospective assessment of TS staining intensity in tissue samples obtained from GC patients undergoing gastrectomy would be useful to predict the patients who would be benefited from 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in nonresectable advanced gastric cancer: a short communication

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel (TAX), cisplatin (CDDP), and fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (CF) as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimens in the treatment of nonresectable advanced gastric cancer. Twelve patients with nonresectable advanced gastric cancer were treated with NACT regimens consisted of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, plus leucovorin before operation. Nine of the 12 patients were downstaged and 8 were radically operated after the end of the NACT. The overall response rate was 75% with 8.3% complete response and 66.7% partial response, and the ascites disappeared in 63.6%. The most common toxicities were bone marrow suppression, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and heptoses. The toxicities were recoverable after symptomatic treatment. The results confirmed that the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil plus leucovorin (CF) is a very effective and well-tolerated regimen as NACT for the patients with nonresectable advanced gastric cancer.

Does chemoradiotherapy improve outcomes for surgically resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagus?

BACKGROUND

To use a population-based registry to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy or radiation on survival for patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach.

METHODS

A linked data set between the Florida Cancer Data System and the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration from 1998 to 2003 was queried.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,378 patients underwent surgical extirpation with curative intent, 636 patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and 2,742 patients had gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Outcomes were adjusted for patient comorbidities and hospital teaching status. Overall, no benefit was observed for adjuvant therapies for EAC patients. A small improvement in survival was observed with adjuvant therapies for GAC. For localized EAC or GAC there was no additional survival benefit associated with adjuvant therapies. For patients with regional EAC, chemotherapy (20.0 vs. 13.0 months, P < .001) and radiation (18.6 vs. 13.5 months, P = .007) were associated with a statistically significant survival benefit. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of improved survival for regional EAC include chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] .535, P < .001) and radiotherapy (HR .656, P = .01). For GAC, patients with regional disease showed an improved median survival with chemotherapy (21.1 vs. 11.2 months, P < .001) and radiotherapy (22.6 vs. 12.3 months, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of improved survival for regional GAC include chemotherapy (HR .629, P < .001) and radiation (HR .603, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with regional adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach, but not those with localized disease, derive a statistically significant survival benefit from the addition of chemotherapy and radiation to surgical resection.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on stage IV (T4N1-3M0 and T1-3N3M0) gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The optimal chemotherapeutic strategy for gastric cancer patients has not been determined, especially with respect to stage and the curability of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of adjuvant chemotherapy on stage IV (T4N1-3M0 and T1-3N3M0) gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy between a chemotherapy (CTX) group and non-chemotherapy (non-CTX) group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 1,760 patients who underwent gastric surgery by 1 surgeon in a single institution, 162 stage IV gastric cancer patients with curative gastrectomy were analyzed retrospectively, excluding patients with TanyNanyM1. One hundred twenty-five patients who received different chemotherapeutic regimens were compared to 37 patients who did not receive chemotherapy for reasons of old age or according to their expressed desire.

RESULTS

The clinicopathologic factors which showed a clinically significant difference between the two groups were age and histology, which were not associated with patient survival. The CTX group was younger, and had a larger proportion of undifferentiated gastric cancers than the non-CTX group. The mode of treatment failure revealed no significant difference between the CTX and non-CTX groups. The 1, 3, and 5-year disease-free survival and the 1, 3, and 5-year disease-specific survival of the CTX group were 63.9%, 38.4%, and 32.0%, and 85.4%, 52.3%, and 39.6%, respectively, which were more favorable than the non-CTX group (p=0.015 and p=0.001, respectively). Postoperative adjuvant CTX was an independent risk factor for disease-specific survival of stage IV (T4N1-3M0 and T1-3N3M0) gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy by multivariate analysis (odds ratio=2.153; 95% confidence interval=1.349-3.435; p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant CTX may be associated with survival benefit for younger patients with stage IV (T4N1-3M0 and T1-3N3M0) gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology after curative gastrectomy. A randomized controlled trial to reveal the effect of stage-specific adjuvant chemotherapy should be conducted.

Four consecutive multicenter phase II trials of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients with completely resected high-risk gastric cancer: the experience of the German AIO/ARO/CAO group

PURPOSE

Feasibility and efficacy of four different adjuvant radiochemotherapy regimens in patients with completely resected gastric cancer were evaluated in consecutive cooperative phase II trials using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based combination chemotherapies (CTX) and 5-FU-enhanced radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2005, 157 patients with completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma were included. The study design was based on two cycles of CTX and irradiation with 45 Gy plus concomitant 5-FU 225 mg/m(2) per 24 h between these two cycles. CTX cycles consisted of 5-FU, folinic acid (FA), cisplatin plus paclitaxel (FLPP); 5-FU, FA and cisplatin (FLP); 5-FU, FA and irinotecan (FLI); or 5-FU, cisplatin plus docetaxel (FPD).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for all four trials was 18 months (range, 1-64) without significant difference between the four regimens: FLPP 30 months (2-46+), FLP 18 months (1-64+), FLI 15 months (1-26), FPD 10 months (5-19+). Treatment associated toxicity was tolerable and did not differ significantly between the four CTX regimens. Across all patients grade (3/4), toxicities during the first cycle/chemoradiation/second cycle consisted of leukocytopenia 4%/2%/30%, anorexia 5%/10%/6%, diarrhea 6%/1%/3%, nausea 2%/7%/2%. Early death occurred in one patient due to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Median progression free survival was 23 months for FLPP, 18 months for FLP, 14 months for FLI, 9 months for FPD (not significant). One-year-overall survival rates were 95% for FLPP, 82% for FLP, 94% for FLI, 86% for FPD.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer can be safely given continuous infusion of 5-FU at 225 mg/m(2) per day. In addition, a variety of 5-FU-based multiagent chemotherapy regimen with defined activity in gastric cancer appears both safe and effective when given prior and after radiochemotherapy in this setting.

Current strategies in systemic treatment of gastric cancer and cancer of the gastroesophageal junction

Gastric cancer is a major health issue and a leading cause of death worldwide. The results of standard therapy remain unsatisfactory mainly because of diagnosis at the late stage of disease. Innovative strategies such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cancer have improved the outcome even in operable cases. Whether an adjuvant radiochemotherapy is of benefit after curative resection including systematic lymphadenectomy remains yet unclear. Some progress has been made in the palliative setting by introducing new substances. This review examines recent advances in the systemic treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival rates after curative resection of gastric cancer, MEDLINE (1969-2006), EMBASE (1974-2006), bibliographies, and review articles were searched for relevant articles. The meta-analysis was finally based on 15 trials that included 3212 patients. RR for death in the treated group was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.96) (P = 0.0010). Little or no significant benefits were suggested in subgroup analyses between different population and regimens either. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer confers slightly significant benefits compared to the surgery only group. The prognoses after surgery may differ among various population groups or because of different regimens.

Innovative genomic-based model for personalized treatment of gastric cancer: integrating current standards and new technologies

In the era of network biology, understanding the complexity of the signaling pathways network in cancer origin, progression and metastasis will dramatically alter and improve treatment strategies. Prognosis of gastric cancer remains poor. Clinical decisions on treatment are based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, but are suboptimal. This perspective review, integrating several concepts, including cancer stem cells, provides a novel treatment model for tailoring the best treatment in individual patients with gastric cancer. Biologic metastatic steps (invasion, angiogenesis, intra/extravasation, colonization and microenvironment at distant organs) are orchestrated by mutated genes. Identifying and profiling these key genes and their interactions with environmental factors such as Helicobacter pylori, driver mutations and interacting signaling pathways using high-throughput technologies (including omics, resequencing, genome-wide associations studies and RNAi) in unbiased studies can lead to the development of both novel biomarkers and targeted agents. A comprehensive bench-to-bedside treatment-guided algorithm is provided for optimum preoperative or postoperative combination of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The protocol can be applied with adequate modification for most solid tumors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastric cancer can respond to S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. We tested S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients in Japan with stage II or III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymph-node dissection were randomly assigned to undergo surgery followed by adjuvant therapy with S-1 or to undergo surgery only. In the S-1 group, administration of S-1 was started within 6 weeks after surgery and continued for 1 year. The treatment regimen consisted of 6-week cycles in which, in principle, 80 mg of oral S-1 per square meter of body-surface area per day was given for 4 weeks and no chemotherapy was given for the following 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

We randomly assigned 529 patients to the S-1 group and 530 patients to the surgery-only group between October 2001 and December 2004. The trial was stopped on the recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee, because the first interim analysis, performed 1 year after enrollment was completed, showed that the S-1 group had a higher rate of overall survival than the surgery-only group (P=0.002). Analysis of follow-up data showed that the 3-year overall survival rate was 80.1% in the S-1 group and 70.1% in the surgery-only group. The hazard ratio for death in the S-1 group, as compared with the surgery-only group, was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.87; P=0.003). Adverse events of grade 3 or grade 4 (defined according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute) that were relatively common in the S-1 group were anorexia (6.0%), nausea (3.7%), and diarrhea (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 is an effective adjuvant treatment for East Asian patients who have undergone a D2 dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00152217 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

UFT (tegafur and uracil) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for solid tumors (carcinoma of the lung, stomach, colon/rectum, and breast): clinical evidence, mechanism of action, and future direction

UFT (tegafur and uracil) is an oral anticancer drug that has been developed in Japan. Owing to its mild toxicity profile, UFT can be suitable in an adjuvant setting following a complete tumor resection, whereas its direct antitumor effect achieved may be insufficient for advanced unresectable disease. Therefore, a variety of adjuvant chemotherapy trials with UFT have been conducted, and results of well-designed randomized controlled trials have recently shown a survival benefit of postoperative UFT treatment in resected lung, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. In the present article, postoperative adjuvant trials with UFT-containing chemotherapy are reviewed, and the mechanism of action and future directions are also discussed.

Neoadjuvant treatment in upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas: new paradigms from old concepts?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite a decline in the incidence of upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas in North America and western Europe during the past century, treatment remains a challenging problem for oncologists. The poor outcome associated with surgical resection with curative intent has generated intensive investigation of combined modality treatment approaches including systemic chemotherapy to prevent recurrences and improve overall mortality. This article reviews data on neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment modalities for upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Postoperative chemoradiation is favored in the USA for good performance status patients with resected, high-risk gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (more stage IA). More recently, the UK Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) and Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer-Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive trials results, showing survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy in operable gastric and lower esophageal cancers, have had an impact on the treatment practice in Europe.

SUMMARY

Novel strategies, involving induction with chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation, addition of targeted therapies to perioperative chemotherapy or use of new cytotoxic regimens are under evaluation to improve current standards and try to tailor therapeutic strategies.

Advances in the treatment of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma

Despite a decline in its incidence in the Western world, gastric cancer (GC) remains the fourth most frequent cancer diagnosis worldwide and is, after lung cancer, the second leading cause of death from a malignant disease globally. Based on the published literature, treatment guidelines and reports from international meetings, we here review the current treatment options for GC and discuss insights and perspectives from the latest clinical studies. The management of GC in the early stages of the disease is based on an optimal surgical resection of the primary tumor and the regional lymph nodes. However, less than one third of patients have a resectable disease at diagnosis and among those operated, more than half are not cured by surgery alone, due to a high rate of relapse. Thus, for the majority of patients, systemic cytotoxic therapy, and sometimes radiotherapy, is a treatment option both as an adjunct to surgery and in the palliative setting. Adjuvant chemotherapy offers only a marginal benefit and has not become a standard of care in the West. In North America, adjuvant chemoradiation is broadly used, shown to significantly improve overall survival, albeit with the cost of high toxicity. Furthermore, a recently reported study from the United Kingdom demonstrated a significant disease-free and survival benefit by the use of perioperative combination chemotherapy. Several chemotherapeutic agents have been tested as a palliative therapy in advanced GC including 5- fluorouracil (5-FU), oral pyrimidines, platinum derivatives, anthracyclines, taxanes and camptothecans. It is now accepted that chemotherapy is better than best supportive care only and that 5-FU based combinations are more effective than monotherapy. However, the response rates have generally been moderate and there is no consensus on the optimal combination of cytotoxic agents and the potential role of more recently developed "targeted therapies".

A PILOT STUDY OF PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH OPERABLE GASTRIC CANCER: AUSTRALASIAN GASTROINTESTINAL TRIALS GROUP STUDY 9601

BACKGROUND

With poor cure rates in gastric cancer using surgery alone, the safety, efficacy and feasibility of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy was investigated.

METHODS

Patients with advanced but operable gastric or cardio-oesophageal adenocarcinoma were staged using endoscopy, computed tomography scan and laparoscopy. If considered potentially resectable, they received chemotherapy (epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) for 9 weeks before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 59 participants entered, two were found to have metastatic disease and were excluded from the analysis. Of the participants, 10 were women and 47 men; their median age was 58 years (range 27-83 years) and median performance status 0 (range 0-1). Two of the 57 participants commencing chemotherapy did not undergo surgery (one sudden death, one new liver metastases). Grade 3 and 4 preoperative and postoperative toxicity rates were, respectively, neutropenia 22 and 18%, emesis 12 and 14% and other non-haematological toxicity <10 and <10%. Of the 55 who underwent surgery, 40 had apparently curative resections (clear or positive microscopic margins), 2 died after surgery (anastomotic leak, sepsis) and 16 had postoperative complications. Of these, 27 participants commenced postoperative chemotherapy and 21 completed it. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 19.6 and 22 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Epirubicin, cisplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy was well-tolerated in the preoperative setting and did not appear to increase complication rates of surgery for advanced and operable stomach cancer. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of this strategy in the Australasian clinical setting and are in keeping with the results of a recently reported randomized trial, which demonstrated a significant survival advantage using this chemotherapy regimen.

Molecular markers for gastric adenocarcinoma: an update

Gastric cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide. Treatment of localized gastric cancer relies primarily on surgical intervention, although growing evidence suggests that the addition of chemoradiation may improve disease-free intervals and overall survival. In this regard, the current high rates of recurrence and subsequent poor survival have prompted an ever-increasing use of multimodal strategies, even for early-stage disease. However, these therapies are often limited by debilitating toxicities and varying degrees of response efficacy. As a result, pharmacogenomics, the study of specific genetic and molecular signatures that may be predictive of treatment outcomes, has gained considerable interest. For example, studies have demonstrated that the expression of enzymes involved in the metabolism or conjugation of commonly used chemotherapy agents, such as fluoropyrimidines and cisplatin, can serve as surrogate markers predictive of chemotherapy response. Polymorphisms in the genes encoding these enzymes have also been identified and may further account for altered expression patterns, resulting in varied clinical responses. Future work is necessary to further refine the list of molecular genetic markers and to identify novel markers for prognostic and predictive purposes. Technologies such as microarray analysis may be useful in identifying new molecular genetic markers, and further work may determine whether these markers can be employed to help stratify patients into different multimodal treatment regimens.

Retrospective analysis of 45 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy using an S-1/CDDP combination

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for highly advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has not been established yet. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represents a promising approach, which may improve the prognosis of AGC. In this study, we analyzed the feasibility and efficacy of NAC with S-1 (TS-1)/cisplatin CDDP in order to design appropriate clinical trials for AGC.

METHODS

Results for a series of 45 consecutive patients with AGC treated with S-1/CDDP induction chemotherapy since January 2002 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was resected in 36 of the 45 patients (resectability, 80.0%). Progression of the disease during chemotherapy was observed in 1 patient only (2.2%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, and serious adverse effects (grade 3-4) were noted in only 2.2% of the patients. The overall median survival time was 1.82 years. Especially noteworthy is that, in patients with highly advanced disease (pretreatment [c]-stage IV; n = 27), resectability was 66.7% and curative (R0) resection was possible in 10 patients. The median survival times for c-stage IV patients who had total, curative, and noncurative resections were 20.8, 22.3 and 12.6 months, respectively. R0 resection was possible for all c-stage III patients (n = 17), with a 2-year overall survival of 90.9%. The downstaging rate was 55.6% (20/36), resulting in a significantly improved prognosis for the downstaged patients (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy using S-1/CDDP for AGC appears to be a safe and promising treatment. We have therefore started two independent multiinstitutional clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment.

Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance testing: to be "standard" or to be individualized, that is the question

Radical surgery with extended lymph-node dissection is the treatment of first choice and the only curative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. While recent combination chemotherapy with S-1 (a combination of tegafur with two biomodulators, gimeracil and oteracil) has achieved high response rates, controversy still remains regarding the significance of adjuvant cancer chemotherapy after surgery. We have been applying chemosensitivity testing in evaluating the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Our multiple studies have indicated that this chemosensitivity testing would be useful to improve the results of adjuvant chemotherapy, by increasing survivals in the sensitive group. The chemosensitivity testing is approved as "advanced clinical medicine" by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labor at 11 institutes at present. While complete lymph-node dissection and chemosensitivity test-guided adjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to result in a survival benefit for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer, the clinical utility of the testing should be established by means of prospective, randomized clinical trials. Two pivotal clinical trials have been initiated to clarify the utility of chemosensitivity testing in the selection of the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers

Capecitabine is a novel, orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate that has been approved for adjuvant treatment in patients with Stage III colon cancer, first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, and metastatic breast cancer, both as a single agent (for patients who are resistant to paclitaxel and anthracyclines) and in combination with docetaxel (after failure on anthracycline-based therapy). Capecitabine is being investigated in Phase I and II trials for the treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers, primarily in the first-line metastatic setting but also in the adjuvant setting. The MEDLINE data base was searched for English-language clinical trials that were published from 1996 through October 2005 along with relevant abstracts that were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and at meetings of the European Cancer Conference and the European Society of Medical Oncology. The most frequently investigated combinations were capecitabine with docetaxel, paclitaxel, cisplatin, or oxaliplatin, and capecitabine also has been combined with irinotecan. These therapies have yielded efficacy data that compare favorably with data from Phase III trials of parenteral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line metastatic setting, and they mostly are well tolerated. Capecitabine, when combined in doses <1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, consistently resulted in a lower frequency of Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects. Capecitabine, as a representative of oral fluoropymidine, is a promising agent in gastroesophageal cancers. Although some Phase III trials are completed, additional Phase III trials of capecitabine-based combinations that compare its efficacy and safety with parenteral 5-FU-based combinations, in both first-line metastatic and adjuvant settings, would be important.

Selecting a specific pre- or postoperative adjuvant therapy for individual patients with operable gastric cancer

Although the very high locoregional recurrence rates reported with limited D0/D1 surgery can be reduced with extended D2 gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer, overall relapse and survival rates remain poor and can only be improved with adequate perioperative adjuvant treatment. However, despite intensive research, no regimen has been established as standard. Meta-analyses have demonstrated a marginal survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy. Two recent large randomized trials for operable gastric cancer, the MAGIC trial and the INT-0116 trial, provide evidence that some patients may benefit from perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation, respectively. However, while both trials suggest an overall survival benefit with adjuvant treatment, they don't provide the harm-benefit ratio for specific subsets of patients wih different extent of surgery (D1 or D2) and tumor stage (early [T1,2]/advanced [T3,4]). This lack of evidence complicates current therapeutic adjuvant decisions. Estimating the risk of local and distant recurrence (high, moderate or low) after D1 or D2 surgery in various tumor stages and the expected harm-benefit ratio, the authors provide useful information for decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy with or withour radiotherapy in individual patients. Research on newer cytotoxic and targeted agents may improve treatment efficacy. Simultaneously, advances with microarray-based gene-expression profiling signatures may improve individualized treatment decisions. However, the validation and translation of these genomic classifiers as biomarkers into a completed 'bench-to-bedside' cycle for tailoring treatment to individuals is a major challenge and limits inflated expectations.

Preoperative and adjuvant therapies for upper gastrointestinal cancers

Survival of esophageal, gastrointestinal junction and gastric cancers is poor given that they frequently present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The incidence of gastrointestinal junction adenocarcinoma is increasing whereas that of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is decreasing. The accuracy of staging has improved with newer diagnostic techniques, including positron emission tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopy, and this should be integrated in prospective Phase III clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for some esophageal and all gastric carcinomas. For esophageal cancer (except for one trial by Walsh and colleagues), four randomized Phase III trials comparing preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone have not shown a survival benefit. Neither have the trials, where preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, is compared with definitive chemoradiation. Nevertheless, it is commonly practiced in the USA and has become a preferred combined modality approach. Postoperative chemoradiation is favored in the USA for good performance status patients with resected, high-risk gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (more than Stage IA). The UK-MAGIC trial results, showing survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy in operable gastric and lower esophageal cancers, probably has an impact on the treatment practice of these cancers in Europe and Asia. Promising results from trials involving preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery in gastric cancer (pathologic complete response of 20-30%) need to be further evaluated in a Phase III setting and compared with postoperative chemoradiation. Active ongoing research will help us clarify the role of preoperative and adjuvant therapies in esophageal and gastric cancers. The role of molecular profiling is evolving and will help us differentiate the responders from the nonresponders.

Perspectives in the treatment of gastric cancer

The overall 5-year survival of patients with gastric cancer is only 23% in the US compared with 60% in Japan. For Western patients, detecting the disease earlier and applying treatment quality control could substantially improve clinical outcome. For the treatment of gastric cancer, complete tumor resection, whenever feasible, is the standard treatment. Resection of the primary tumor (partial or total gastrectomy) is based on standardized criteria of the tumor, such as location, stage, histology, and surgical margins. The extent of regional lymphadenectomy required, however, has been a matter of considerable debate. Emerging evidence from the latest randomized controlled trials show that extended (D2) lymphadenectomy is safe and able to cure 20% of patients with N2-disease compared with 0% treated with limited D1 dissection, provided that the optimal surgical technique is used. Estimates suggest that this N2-specific subgroup advantage reflects a potential absolute overall survival benefit of 3-6%. Postoperative decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy are based on pathologic staging, the extent of surgery performed (D0/D1 vs D2/D3) and the risk-benefit ratio. Recurrence-risk and mortality-risk reduction is achievable with a carefully planned relapse-prevention guided therapeutic strategy. Patient-related factors (tumor features and expected recurrence-risk magnitude) and treatment-related factors (surgical experience, adjuvant treatment risk-benefit ratio) should be considered on an individual basis. In future, genomic-based approaches will help to provide a more personalized therapeutic approach and improve patient outcome.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C).

RESULTS

The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.