The effect of electromagnetic shielding on phantom limb pain: A placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial

Beyond traditional therapies: a network meta-analysis on the treatment efficacy for chronic phantom limb pain

BACKGROUND

Phantom limb pain (PLP) frequently affects individuals with limb amputations. When PLP evolves into its chronic phase, known as chronic PLP, traditional therapies often fall short in providing sufficient relief. The optimal intervention for chronic PLP remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this network meta-analysis (NMA) were to examine the efficacy of different treatments on pain intensity for patients with chronic PLP.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and CINAHL EBSCO, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated interventions such as neuromodulation, neural block, pharmacological methods, and alternative treatments. An NMA was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome was pain score improvement, and the secondary outcomes were adverse events.

FINDINGS

The NMA, incorporating 12 RCTs, indicated that neuromodulation, specifically repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, provided the most substantial pain improvement when compared with placebo/sham groups (mean difference=-2.9 points, 95% CI=-4.62 to -1.18; quality of evidence (QoE): moderate). Pharmacological intervention using morphine was associated with a significant increase in adverse event rate (OR=6.04, 95% CI=2.26 to 16.12; QoE: low).

CONCLUSIONS

The NMA suggests that neuromodulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be associated with significantly larger pain improvement for chronic PLP. However, the paucity of studies, varying patient characteristics across each trial, and absence of long-term results underscore the necessity for more comprehensive, large-scale RCTs.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023455949.

Amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: The 2020 Dutch evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline

BACKGROUND

Lower-limb amputations are rare but debilitating events in the lives of affected persons. Treatment of persons with amputation inherently involves many different health care professions at different stages leading to and after an amputation. There are prevailing clinical questions within the work field related to different facets of care including peri/postoperative aspects, prosthetic components, rehabilitation treatment, and health care processes.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an up-to-date multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for health care professionals involved in the treatment of persons with lower-limb amputation in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Identification of key questions in a focus group, systematic review of the evidence (up to March 2019, using Embase and MEDLINE databases), and weighing considerations, culminating in clinical recommendations.

RESULTS

Twelve key questions were formulated. Recommendations of two key questions were upheld in line with the previous 2012 guideline. Ten systematic literature searches were performed, leading to the inclusion of 59 studies.

CONCLUSION

A summary of evidence-based conclusions, considerations, and recommendations of the 2020 guideline is presented.

Management of lower limb amputations

The most common reason for lower limb amputations in the UK is peripheral arterial disease. A thoughtful approach to surgery, with consideration of optimal amputation level and residual limb shape, can improve prosthetic use and functional outcomes. Prosthesis socket design and fit, as well as use of appropriate components, must be considered in accordance with the patient's activity level and potential. Major developments in prosthetics over the past 20 years, particularly in the area of joint design, including microprocessor knees, have increased options to improve ambulation. This is particularly significant among those with more proximal amputations, for whom energy expenditure on walking is even greater. Management of post-amputation pain syndromes including phantom limb pain can prove challenging, although there are novel options for pain control. Long-term care of both the residual and contralateral limbs is paramount to reduce risk of further amputation surgery, and optimize longer term function and quality of life.