1
|
Jongebloed-Westra M, Exterkate SH, van Netten JJ, Kappert KDR, Koffijberg H, Bode C, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, Ten Klooster PM. The effectiveness of motivational interviewing on adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes in people with diabetes at low-to-high risk of foot ulceration: A multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 204:110903. [PMID: 37704109 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by MI-trained podiatrists in improving adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes in comparison to usual care in people with diabetes at low-to-high risk of ulceration. METHODS People with diabetes with loss of protective sensation and/or peripheral artery disease, and with orthopedic shoes prescription were allocated to receive one MI-consultation by a podiatrist randomized to MI training (n = 53) or usual care only (n = 68). Adherence was measured as the percentage of steps taken while wearing orthopedic shoes, determined using an insole temperature microsensor and wrist-worn activity tracker during one week at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS The proportion of participants ≥80 % adherent to wearing their orthopedic shoes was higher in the control group than in the MI-intervention group at 3 months (30.9 % versus 15.1 %; p = 0.044), and not significantly different at 6 months (22.1 % versus 13.2 %; p = 0.210). Average adherence was also higher in the control group than the intervention group at both 3 months (60.9 % versus 50.9 %; p = 0.029) and 6 months (59.9 % versus 49.5 %; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS One podiatrist-led MI-consultation in its current form did not result in higher adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes in people with diabetes 3 and 6 months after inclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register NL7710 (available on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jongebloed-Westra
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, Tech Med Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - S H Exterkate
- Voetencentrum Wender, Sabina Klinkhamerweg 10, 7555 SK Hengelo, The Netherlands; Voetmax Orthopedie, Sabina Klinkhamerweg 10, 7555 SK Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - J J van Netten
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K D R Kappert
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, PO Box 7600, 7600 SZ Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - H Koffijberg
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Tech Med Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - C Bode
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, Tech Med Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, Tech Med Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - P M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, Tech Med Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kunkel D, Mamode L, Burnett M, Pickering R, Bader D, Donovan-Hall M, Cole M, Ashburn A, Bowen C. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in community dwelling people with stroke: a cross-sectional observational study. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:2630-2637. [PMID: 35968548 PMCID: PMC9612931 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2102679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore footwear characteristics and foot problems in community dwelling people with stroke as most research to date focused on the general elderly population. METHODS Thirty people with mild to moderate stroke (nine men, mean age 68, mean time since onset 67 months) attended a single session to assess footwear and foot problems using established podiatry foot (wear) and ankle assessments. RESULTS Most participants wore slippers indoors (n = 17, 57%) and walking shoes outdoors (n = 11, 37%). Over half wore unsupportive ill-fitting shoes indoors and 47% of outdoor shoes fitted badly. All participants had foot problems (mean 6.5 (3.1), 95% CI: 5.4-7.7), including impaired single limb heel raise (93%), reduced range of movement (77%), sensation (47%), and muscle strength (43%). Many had foot-pain, hallux valgus (both 50%), or swollen feet (40%). Foot problems were associated with reduced balance confidence, activity, and community participation (all p < 0.05). A greater proportion of fallers (13/16) than non-fallers (4/14) reported foot problems (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Many community-dwelling people with stroke wore poorly fitting shoes; all had foot problems. Foot problems were linked to reduced mobility. Finding more effective pathways to support people with stroke to select supportive, well-fitting indoor and outdoor footwear is indicated.Implications for rehabilitationPeople with stroke often wear unsupportive ill-fitting shoes and experience foot problems.Assessment of foot problems and footwear advice should be considered during stroke rehabilitation particularly when interventions target fall prevention or improvements in balance and mobility.Information on appropriate footwear and signposting that new shoe purchases should include measuring feet to ensure a good fit is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Kunkel
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Louis Mamode
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Malcolm Burnett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ruth Pickering
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Dan Bader
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mark Cole
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ann Ashburn
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Catherine Bowen
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jarl G, Rusaw DF, Terrill AJ, Barnett CT, Woodruff MA, Lazzarini PA. Personalized Offloading Treatments for Healing Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcers. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:99-106. [PMID: 35658555 PMCID: PMC9846383 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221101632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-removable knee-high devices are the gold-standard offloading treatments to heal plantar diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). These devices are underused in practice for a variety of reasons. Recommending these devices for all patients, regardless of their circumstances and preferences influencing their ability to tolerate the devices, does not seem a fruitful approach. PURPOSE The aim of this article is to explore the potential implications of a more personalized approach to offloading DFUs and suggest avenues for future research and development. METHODS Non-removable knee-high devices effectively heal plantar DFUs by reducing plantar pressure and shear at the DFU, reducing weight-bearing activity and enforcing high adherence. We propose that future offloading devices should be developed that aim to optimize these mechanisms according to each individual's needs. We suggest three different approaches may be developed to achieve such personalized offloading treatment. First, we suggest modular devices, where different mechanical features (rocker-bottom sole, knee-high cast walls/struts, etc.) can be added or removed from the device to accommodate different patients' needs and the evolving needs of the patient throughout the treatment period. Second, advanced manufacturing techniques and novel materials could be used to personalize the design of their devices, thereby improving common hindrances to their use, such as devices being heavy, bulky, and hot. Third, sensors could be used to provide real-time feedback to patients and clinicians on plantar pressures, shear, weight-bearing activity, and adherence. CONCLUSIONS By the use of these approaches, we could provide patients with personalized devices to optimize plantar tissue stress, thereby improving clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Jarl
- Department of Prosthetics and
Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro,
Sweden
- University Health Care Research
Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro,
Sweden
- Gustav Jarl, PhD, University Health
Care Research Center, Örebro University Hospital, S-huset, vån 1,
Örebro, SE-701 85, Sweden.
| | - David F. Rusaw
- School of Health and Welfare,
Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Alexander J. Terrill
- School of Mechanical, Medical and
Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD,
Australia
- Centre for Biomedical
Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD,
Australia
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross
University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Maria A. Woodruff
- School of Mechanical, Medical and
Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD,
Australia
- Centre for Biomedical
Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD,
Australia
| | - Peter A. Lazzarini
- School of Public Health and
Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Allied Health Research
Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keukenkamp R, van Netten JJ, Busch-Westbroek TE, Nollet F, Bus SA. Users' needs and expectations and the design of a new custom-made indoor footwear solution for people with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44:8493-8500. [PMID: 34846977 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2003878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess users' needs and expectations regarding custom-made indoor footwear, and to design such footwear with similar biomechanical efficacy and better usability compared to regular custom-made footwear in people with diabetes at risk for foot ulceration. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multidisciplinary systematic design approach. Needs and expectations regarding indoor footwear were evaluated via a questionnaire in 50 high foot ulcer risk people with diabetes using custom-made footwear. We systematically designed indoor footwear, and manufactured this for nine participants. Primary requirement was similar plantar pressure compared to participants' regular custom-made footwear. RESULTS Eighty-two percent of participants expressed a need for custom-made indoor footwear and 66% expected such footwear to increase their adherence. The custom-made indoor footwear had the same bottom construction as participants' regular custom-made footwear, but with softer and more light-weight upper materials. Peak pressures were similar or lower, while qualitative evaluation showed better usability and lower costs for indoor footwear. CONCLUSIONS People with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration expressed a clear need for custom-made indoor footwear, and expected such footwear to increase their adherence. Our indoor footwear design provides adequate pressure relief, with better usability, and can be produced at lower costs compared to regular custom-made footwear.Implications for rehabilitationPeople with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration express a need for special indoor footwear.We developed indoor footwear with similar offloading capacity as regular custom-made footwear.The indoor footwear is lighter in weight, easier to don/doff and lower in costs.At-risk people with diabetes expect this footwear to increase their footwear adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske Keukenkamp
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap J van Netten
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E Busch-Westbroek
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Nollet
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sicco A Bus
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peek-Kuijt NM, Aantjes MJ, Verwey M, Van Bodegom-Vos L, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Maljaars JP. Treatment goals in IBD: A perspective from patients and their partners. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100034. [PMID: 37213759 PMCID: PMC10194327 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective To identify and compare treatment goals between IBD patients and partners, and how these change upon receiving information. Methods During a patient information day a self-made survey was distributed before and after a lecture about a physicians' view on treatments goals. Patients and partners were asked for their preferred treatment goals at 6 weeks and at 6 months and could choose between short-term goals (symptom free, improved functioning, better QOL, normal colonoscopy) and long-term goals (prevention of surgery, complications, flares and no steroids). Results Being "symptom-free" (55.9%) was the preferred goal. Patients with higher disease activity chose more short-term goals (p=0.03) at 6 weeks. Age, gender and education did not affect treatment goals. Partners chose more short-term goals (p=0.03) at 6 weeks. Post-lecture, answers shifter to normal colonoscopy (4.2% versus 18.0%, p=0.001), and a better QOL (21.2% vs 33.3%, p=0.039) as goal at 6-months. Conclusions Patients' 6-week treatment goals focused on being symptom-free and having a high QOL, especially those patients with high disease activity. Partners chose more short-term goals than patients at 6 weeks. Innovation General health information can be applied and translated into treatment goals. This may assist in remote shared goal setting and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Andrea E. van der Meulen-de Jong
- Corresponding author at: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jongebloed-Westra M, Bode C, Bente BE, de Jonge JM, ten Klooster PM, Koffijberg H, Exterkate SH, van Netten JJ, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. Attitudes and experiences towards the application of motivational interviewing by podiatrists working with people with diabetes at high-risk of developing foot ulcers: a mixed-methods study. J Foot Ankle Res 2022; 15:62. [PMID: 35986419 PMCID: PMC9388362 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-022-00567-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Podiatrists are key professionals in promoting adequate foot self-care for people with diabetes at high-risk of developing foot ulcers. However, merely informing patients about the advantages of foot self-care is insufficient to realise behavioural change. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a promising person-centred communication style that could help to create a working alliance between healthcare providers and patient to improve foot self-care. This study aims to observe and analyse the application of MI in consultations carried out by MI-trained and non-MI-trained podiatrists with their patients, and explore podiatrists’ attitudes and experiences towards MI.
Methods
Eighteen podiatrists (median age: 28.5 years, 10 female and 8 male) followed a three-day basic training in MI and 4 podiatrists (median age: 38.5 years, 4 female) were not trained in MI. To observe and rate the MI-fidelity in daily clinical practice, audio recordings from the MI-trained and non-MI-trained podiatrists were scored with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity code. Individual, semi-structed, in-depth interviews were conducted with the MI-trained podiatrists to explore their attitudes towards and experiences with MI. These data sources were triangulated to describe the effect of training podiatrists in MI for their clinical practice.
Results
The MI-trained podiatrists scored significantly higher than the non-MI-trained podiatrists on two of four global MI-related communication skills (empathy, p = 0.008 and change talk, p = 0.008), on one of five core MI-adherent behaviours (affirmation, p = 0.041) and on one of the other behaviour counts (simple reflections, p = 0.008). The podiatrists mainly reported their attitudes and experiences regarding partnership and cultivating change talk, during the interviews. In addition, they also mentioned facilitators and barriers to using MI and indicated whether they experienced MI as having added value.
Conclusions
The MI-trained podiatrists used the principles of MI at a solid beginner proficiency level in their clinical practice in comparison to the non-MI-trained podiatrists, who did not reach this level. This achievement is in accordance with the basic MI-training they received. This multi-method study reveals that podiatrists can be effectively trained in applying MI in daily clinical practice.
Trial registration
Netherlands Trial Register NL7710. Registered: 6 May 2019.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jongebloed-Westra M, Bode C, van Netten JJ, Ten Klooster PM, Exterkate SH, Koffijberg H, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. Using motivational interviewing combined with digital shoe-fitting to improve adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes in people with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:750. [PMID: 34711263 PMCID: PMC8551942 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05680-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Diabetic foot ulcers have a high impact on mobility and daily functioning and lead to high treatment costs, for example, by hospitalization and amputation. To prevent (re)ulcerations, custom-made orthopedic shoes are considered essential. However, adherence to wearing the orthopedic shoes is low, and improving adherence was not successful in the past. We propose a novel care approach that combines motivational interviewing (MI) with a digital shoe-fitting procedure to improve adherence to orthopedic shoes. The aim of this trial is to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of this novel care approach compared to usual care (no MI and casting-based shoe-fitting) in promoting footwear adherence and ulcer prevention. Methods The trial will include people with diabetes, with IWGDF Risk categories 1–3, who have been prescribed orthopedic shoes. Participants will be randomized at the level of the podiatrist to the novel care approach or usual care. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who adhere to the use of their orthopedic shoes, that is, who take at least 80% of their total daily steps with orthopedic shoes. A temperature microsensor will be built into the participants’ orthopedic shoes to measure wearing time continuously over 12 months. In addition, daily activity will be measured periodically using log data with an activity monitor. Data from the temperature microsensor and activity monitor will be combined to calculate adherence. (Re-)experienced complications after receiving orthopedic shoes will be registered. Questionnaires and interviews will measure the experiences of participants regarding orthopedic shoes, experiences of podiatrists regarding motivational interviewing, care consumption, and quality of life. Differences in costs and quality of life will be determined in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Discussion This trial will generate novel insights into the socio-economic and well-being impact and the clinical effectiveness of the novel care approach on adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NL7710. Registered on 6 May 2019
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jongebloed-Westra
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE,, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - C Bode
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE,, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - J J van Netten
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ,, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Diabetic Foot Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, PO Box 7600, 7600 SZ,, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - P M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE,, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - S H Exterkate
- Voetencentrum Wender, Sabina Klinkhamerweg 10, 7555 SK,, Hengelo, The Netherlands.,Voetmax Orthopedie, Sabina Klinkhamerweg 10, 7555 SK,, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - H Koffijberg
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE,, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth Research and Wellbeing, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE,, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Netten JJ, Jarl G, Postema K, Williams AE. A toolkit for prosthetists and orthotists to facilitate progress in professional communication over the next 50 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44:408-415. [PMID: 33045902 PMCID: PMC7689560 DOI: 10.1177/0309364620962325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this celebratory issue of Prosthetics and Orthotics International, we review professional communication skills in the field of prosthetics and orthotics. OBJECTIVE We aim to reflect on communication skills in the past 50 years, to discuss developments in the coming 50 years, and to create a toolkit and research agenda to facilitate progress in professional communication in the next 50 years. RESULTS Despite being a key area in prosthetics and orthotics training programmes, we found no studies on professional communication with an experimental design published in Prosthetics and Orthotics International. As an alternative, we provide clinical reflections on the changes in professional communication in the past 50 years, and we discuss questionnaire-based and qualitative studies that provide evidence for the importance of communication in pedorthic footwear provision. In the coming 50 years, professional communication in the field of prosthetics and orthotics may be impacted by aging populations, global mobility, information technology, technological advances and emphasis on prevention. We discuss each of these topics. To facilitate progress in professional communication, we have created a toolkit with resources for prosthetics and orthotics professionals, prosthetics and orthotics students and other interested professionals. CONCLUSIONS We hope this toolkit will inspire others to use, extend and implement it in their daily practice. As a research agenda, we strongly recommend undertaking research on interventions to improve professional communication and to study its effect on clinically meaningful outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaap J Van Netten
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Jaap J Van Netten, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gustav Jarl
- Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden,University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Klaas Postema
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anita E Williams
- Directorate of Allied and Public Health, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Desmond D, Gallagher P. Reflections and future directions for psychological science in Prosthetics and Orthotics International. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44:402-407. [PMID: 33164660 DOI: 10.1177/0309364620967780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
In the inaugural edition of Prosthetics and Orthotics International in 1977, Dr Sidney Fishman identified the Psychological Sciences as one of six indispensable areas of skill and knowledge in professional prosthetic-orthotic practice. Since then, there have been substantial changes and developments in the complexity and capabilities of assistive technologies, greater emphasis on understanding the relationships between people and enabling technologies, growing recognition of the importance of the contexts and environments that support their use, and changes in both health care services and the professional development of prosthetists and orthotists. The aim of this narrative review is to reflect on the role of Prosthetics and Orthotics International in shaping the evolving understanding of psychology in prosthetics and orthotics. There remains considerable potential and opportunity for the development and application of psychology in addressing the challenges of disability globally. However, a broad interpretation and application of the principles of rehabilitation psychology are needed if we are to meaningfully incorporate psychological science into the knowledge that informs prosthetic and orthotic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Desmond
- Department of Psychology and Assisting Living and Learning Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Pamela Gallagher
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hall N, Parker D, Williams A. An exploratory qualitative study of health professional perspectives on clinical outcomes in UK orthotic practice. J Foot Ankle Res 2020; 13:49. [PMID: 32727515 PMCID: PMC7392713 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00416-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite potential savings to the National Health Service, the collection of data on outcomes of NHS orthotic services is patchy. Indeed, several reports into orthotic services in the UK have reported a lack of data relating to outcomes of care and highlighted the need to routinely measure outcomes to demonstrate efficacy of services. Whilst a previous study provided an overview of the use of outcome measures in orthotic practice and identified some barriers to their use, further questions emerged. Hence, this qualitative study aimed to explore orthotists’ opinions and personal experiences on the influences on outcomes, how appropriate and relevant outcomes can be measured and also how barriers to the use of outcome measures can be overcome. Methods Following a review of the literature, an initial advisory group informed semi-structured questions. These were used to create dialogue in a focus group of 12 orthotists. Data from the focus group was transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis, creating themes and subthemes for discussion. Results The setting of realistic and agreed goals through managing expectations, compromise and patient education/information were seen as factors that could inform and improve outcomes. Barriers to the collection of outcome measures were associated with inadequate technology to manage the data, lack of time to complete them, lack of training in them and difficulties selecting appropriate outcome measures for patients with complex problems managed by different health professionals. The participants discussed ways of addressing these barriers, such as the use of ‘snapshots’ and delegation of data collection. Conclusions This study has revealed that measuring outcomes is considered to be an important activity. In order to achieve good outcomes, it is important to address patient expectations, discuss and establish joint goals for care at the outset and inform and include patients in the decision-making process. The identified barriers to measuring outcomes can be overcome with the solutions revealed by these participants. Hence, this study has contributed to current knowledge which has relevance for clinical practice and may provide the theoretical basis for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Hall
- Orthotics Department, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Daniel Parker
- School of Health and Society University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Anita Williams
- School of Health and Society University of Salford, Salford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
“You don’t like to tell them their job but it’s your foot at the end of the day”: theorising and negotiating ‘resistance’ in clinical encounters. SOCIAL THEORY & HEALTH 2020. [DOI: 10.1057/s41285-020-00134-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
12
|
Tehan PE, Taylor WJ, Carroll M, Dalbeth N, Rome K. Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0226906. [PMID: 31881047 PMCID: PMC6934318 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for women with RA. This study aimed to determine consensus from health professionals about the important features of retail footwear for women with RA. Methods An international Delphi exercise using online survey software was conducted with 39 participants from health care backgrounds. Three iterative rounds were conducted. In the first round, participants listed features of retail footwear that would be important for women with RA. Responses of the first round, combined with results of a scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing footwear in arthritis and a qualitative analysis of female patients’ perspectives of retail footwear in RA were used to create items for the second round. Items were scored by a 9-point rating scale with consensus defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. The third round consisted of items which did not reach consensus or scored >1 on the RAND/UCLA disagreement index from round two. Results Fifty-eight items (n = 58) were generated for rating and at the end of three iterative rounds, there was agreement that thirty-eight items were important, that two were not important, and there was no agreement for a further eighteen items. Item themes reaching consensus included footwear characteristics and acceptability and psychosocial aspects of footwear. Footwear characteristics related to heel height, shape, cushioning, toe box size, adjustable fastening, removable insoles, mid-foot support and soft accommodative uppers. Acceptability and psychosocial aspects included affordability, comfort, aesthetic, style, colour and impact on femininity. Conclusion This consensus exercise has identified the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peta Ellen Tehan
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
- * E-mail:
| | - William J. Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Matthew Carroll
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Keith Rome
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McCaughan D, Booth A, Jackson C, Lalor S, Ramdharry G, O'Connor RJ, Phillips M, Bowers R, McDaid C. Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: qualitative interview study of patient perspectives. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029313. [PMID: 31628124 PMCID: PMC6803152 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adults with knee instability related to neuromuscular disorders or central nervous conditions often experience mobility problems and rely on orthoses to improve function and mobility. Patient views of device effectiveness and acceptability are underexplored. Our study aimed to elicit device users' perspectives regarding fitting, acceptability, effectiveness and use of orthoses, and identify important treatment outcomes. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive study using in-depth semistructured interviews. Interview transcriptions were coded and thematically analysed, using 'Framework'. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A purposive sample of 24 adult users of orthotic devices. Nineteen patients were recruited across three National Health Service sites, and five people through charities/patient support groups in England. Half of the participants had been diagnosed with poliomyelitis, and the remainder with multiple sclerosis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, spinal injury or spina bifida, and stroke. The median age of participants was 64.5 years (range 36-80 years). RESULTS Patients' medical condition impacted significantly on daily life. Participants relied on orthotic devices to enable engagement in daily activities. Patient goals for mobility were linked to individual circumstances. Desired treatment outcomes included reduction in pain, trips and falls, with improved balance and stability. Effectiveness, reliability, comfort and durability were the most valued features of orthoses and associated with reported use. Obtaining suitable footwear alongside orthotic devices was a significant concern. Time pressures during device fitting were viewed negatively. CONCLUSIONS Orthotic devices for knee instability play a crucial role in promoting, maintaining and enhancing physical and psychological health and well-being, enabling patients to work, engage in family life and enjoy social activities. Future research should consider how best to measure the impact of orthotic devices on patient quality of life and daily functioning outside the clinic setting, as well as device use and any adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This qualitative study was retrospectively registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN65240228.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison Booth
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Simon Lalor
- Orthotics, Queen Mary's Hospital, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Orthotics/Prosthetics, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gita Ramdharry
- Faculty of Allied Health, Midwifery and Social Care, Kingston University/St George's University of London, London, UK
- Queen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Rory J O'Connor
- Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Roy Bowers
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Background Non-removable offloading devices are recommended for the treatment of uncomplicated plantar diabetic foot ulcers because adherence to using removable devices is low. However, patients may not always understand how crucial the non-removability is to ulcer healing, leaving them with the impression that it is the device per se that heals the ulcer. Thus, after ulcer healing when patients return to using removable offloading devices, typically therapeutic footwear, they often return to a low level of adherence resulting in high reulceration rates. To change this pattern of behavior based on a misconception, we need to start with how we as clinicians are conceptualizing treatment with offloading devices. Non-removable offloading devices as commitment devices Commitment devices are voluntary restrictions people put on their future selves to resist short-term temptations and achieve long-term goals. In this paper, it is suggested that a change from viewing non-removable offloading devices as means to force compliance, to viewing them as commitment devices could facilitate a change to a clinical thinking that emphasizes the importance of high adherence without compromising respect for patient autonomy. Conclusion Viewing non-removable offloading devices as commitment devices seems to be a promising approach to emphasize the importance of adherence while respecting patient autonomy. Hopefully, patients’ higher appreciation of the role of adherence can lead to higher adherence to using therapeutic footwear after healing and consequently to reduced reulceration rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Jarl
- 1Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 70182 Örebro, Sweden.,2University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 70182 Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tan S, Horobin H, Tunprasert T. The lived experience of people with diabetes using off-the-shelf prescription footwear in Singapore: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2019; 12:19. [PMID: 30949242 PMCID: PMC6429698 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-019-0329-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diabetic foot ulceration (DFUs) is increasingly prevalent in Singapore. Appropriate management is important since DFU brings with it an associated risk for lower limb amputations, high morbidity rates and costs. Footwear prescription has been a part of clinical guidelines to manage DFUs. However, adherence to prescription footwear is typically poor amongst patients. Reasons for this have been explored in Northern American and Western European studies, but not in Singapore’s context. As cultural and climate differences limit transferability of findings from existing studies to individuals in Singapore, this study aims to explore the lived experiences of participants with diabetes using prescription footwear in Singapore. Methods This was a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to understand some people’s personal experience of using off the shelf prescription footwear. A total of 8 people with diabetes who received prescription footwear as part of their diabetic foot management were recruited. All participants provided written consent and took part in a semi-structured interview lasting up to an hour. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using an IPA approach. Findings and discussion The analysis identified the super-ordinate themes of 1) security and 2) acceptance with sub-themes of 1.1) risk and 1.2) protection and 2.1) personal and social acceptance and 2.2) social and cultural acceptance respectively that inter-related to influence how participants’ made footwear decisions. This process of evaluation was portrayed to be a fluctuant one, making it difficult to predict yet necessary to understand. A modified seesaw model of adherence is suggested to explain this decision-making process. Conclusions The complex manner by which participants grappled with security and acceptance is often overlooked when footwear is prescribed, highlighting a need for a more collaborative clinician-patient partnership for these issues to surface in clinical practice. Furthermore, prescription footwear should be seen more holistically. Empowering patients with choice to select from a range of therapeutic yet normalised footwear could increase the level of security and acceptance they experience with its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena Tan
- 1Podiatry Department, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606 Singapore
| | - Hazel Horobin
- 2University of Brighton, School of Health Professions, 49 Darley Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7UR UK
| | - Thanaporn Tunprasert
- 3University of Brighton, School of Health Professions, 49 Darley Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7UR UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barwick AL, Hurn SE, van Netten JJ, Reed LF, Lazzarini PA. Factors associated with wearing inadequate outdoor footwear in populations at risk of foot ulceration: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211140. [PMID: 30789920 PMCID: PMC6383933 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have investigated if people at risk of foot ulceration actually wear the footwear recommended by best practice guidelines to prevent foot ulceration. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of, and factors associated with, wearing inadequate outdoor footwear in those with diabetes or peripheral neuropathy in an inpatient population. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a multi-site cross-sectional study investigating foot conditions in a large representative inpatient population admitted into hospital for any medical reason on one day. A range of explanatory variables were collected from all participants including sociodemographic, medical and foot condition factors. The outcome variable for this study was the self-reported outdoor footwear type worn most by participants outside the house in the year prior to hospitalisation. The self-reported footwear type was then categorised into adequate and inadequate according to footwear features recommended in guidelines for populations at risk of foot ulceration. Logistic regression identified factors independently associated with inadequate footwear in all inpatient participants, and diabetes and neuropathy subgroups. RESULTS Overall, 47% of a total of 726 inpatients wore inadequate outdoor footwear; 49% of the 171 in the diabetes subgroup and 43% of 159 in the neuropathy subgroup. Wearing inadequate outdoor footwear was independently associated (Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)) with being female in the diabetes (2.7 (1.4-5.2)) and neuropathy subgroups (3.7 (1.8-7.9)) and being female (5.1 (3.7-7.1)), having critical peripheral arterial disease (2.5 (1.1-5.9)) and an amputation (0.3 (0.1-0.7)) in all inpatients (all, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Almost half of all inpatients at risk of foot ulceration reported wearing outdoor footwear most of the time that did not meet recommendations for prevention. We found women were much more likely to wear inadequate footwear. More work needs to be done to increase the uptake of footwear recommendations in these populations to prevent foot ulceration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex L. Barwick
- School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sheree E. Hurn
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jaap J. van Netten
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Rehabilitation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lloyd F. Reed
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Footmotion Podiatry Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter A. Lazzarini
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The effectiveness of therapeutic shoes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2018; 38:749-762. [PMID: 29556705 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4014-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The study summarizes the evidence on the effectiveness of therapeutic shoes on foot function, foot pain, physical functioning, health-related quality of life, adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Studies investigating the effect of (ready- or custom-made) therapeutic shoes were included. For between-group designs, studies comparing therapeutic shoes versus non-therapeutic shoes were included. A literature search was conducted in The Cochrane Central Registry for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE and PEDro up to January 19, 2017. Quantitative data analysis was conducted; when this was not possible qualitative data analysis was performed. Eleven studies were identified. For custom-made shoes, no studies reporting between-group differences were available. Qualitative data-syntheses of the within-group differences resulted in weak evidence for the reduction of foot pain and improvement of physical functioning. For ready-made shoes, one study reported between-group differences, resulting in inconclusive evidence for improvement of foot function. Quantitative data-analyses of within-group differences resulted in a medium to large effect for the reduction of foot pain (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.28-0.92; P ≤ 0.001; 184 participants) and a small to medium effect for the improvement of physical functioning (SMD 0.30, 95% CI 0.04-0.56; P = 0.02; 150 participants). Qualitative data-synthesis of within-group differences resulted in weak evidence for improvement of foot function. Within-group results indicate that therapeutic shoes are likely to be effective in patients with RA. Definitive high-quality RCTs are necessary to investigate the between-group effectiveness of therapeutic shoes in patients with RA.
Collapse
|
18
|
Nicholls E, Robinson V, Farndon L, Vernon W. 'A good fit?' Bringing the sociology of footwear to the clinical encounter in podiatry services: a narrative review. J Foot Ankle Res 2018; 11:9. [PMID: 29560031 PMCID: PMC5859502 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-018-0253-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This narrative review explores the ways in which drawing on theories and methods used in sociological work on footwear and identity can contribute to healthcare research with podiatrists and their patients, highlighting recent research in this field, implications for practice and potential areas for future development. Traditionally, research within Podiatry Services has tended to adopt a quantitative, positivist focus, developing separately from a growing body of sociological work exploring the importance of shoes in constructing identity and self-image. Bringing qualitative research drawing on sociological theory and methods to the clinical encounter has real potential to increase our understanding of patient values, motivations and – crucially – any barriers to adopting ‘healthier’ footwear that they may encounter. Such work can help practitioners to understand why patients may resist making changes to their footwear practices, and help us to devise new ways for practitioners to explore and ultimately break down individual barriers to change (including their own preconceptions as practitioners). This, in turn, may lead to long-term, sustainable changes to footwear practices and improvements in foot health for those with complex health conditions and the wider population. Conclusion A recognition of the complex links between shoes and identity is opening up space for discussion of patient resistance to footwear changes, and paving the way for future research in this field beyond the temporary ‘moment’ of the clinical encounter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Farndon
- 3Podiatry Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Wesley Vernon
- 3Podiatry Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Netten JJ, Lazzarini PA, Armstrong DG, Bus SA, Fitridge R, Harding K, Kinnear E, Malone M, Menz HB, Perrin BM, Postema K, Prentice J, Schott KH, Wraight PR. Diabetic Foot Australia guideline on footwear for people with diabetes. J Foot Ankle Res 2018; 11:2. [PMID: 29371890 PMCID: PMC5769299 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-017-0244-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this paper was to create an updated Australian guideline on footwear for people with diabetes. Methods We reviewed new footwear publications, (inter)national guidelines, and consensus expert opinion alongside the 2013 Australian footwear guideline to formulate updated recommendations. Result We recommend health professionals managing people with diabetes should: (1) Advise people with diabetes to wear footwear that fits, protects and accommodates the shape of their feet. (2) Advise people with diabetes to always wear socks within their footwear, in order to reduce shear and friction. (3) Educate people with diabetes, their relatives and caregivers on the importance of wearing appropriate footwear to prevent foot ulceration. (4) Instruct people with diabetes at intermediate- or high-risk of foot ulceration to obtain footwear from an appropriately trained professional to ensure it fits, protects and accommodates the shape of their feet. (5) Motivate people with diabetes at intermediate- or high-risk of foot ulceration to wear their footwear at all times, both indoors and outdoors. (6) Motivate people with diabetes at intermediate- or high-risk of foot ulceration (or their relatives and caregivers) to check their footwear, each time before wearing, to ensure that there are no foreign objects in, or penetrating, the footwear; and check their feet, each time their footwear is removed, to ensure there are no signs of abnormal pressure, trauma or ulceration. (7) For people with a foot deformity or pre-ulcerative lesion, consider prescribing medical grade footwear, which may include custom-made in-shoe orthoses or insoles. (8) For people with a healed plantar foot ulcer, prescribe medical grade footwear with custom-made in-shoe orthoses or insoles with a demonstrated plantar pressure relieving effect at high-risk areas. (9) Review prescribed footwear every three months to ensure it still fits adequately, protects, and supports the foot. (10) For people with a plantar diabetic foot ulcer, footwear is not specifically recommended for treatment; prescribe appropriate offloading devices to heal these ulcers. Conclusions This guideline contains 10 key recommendations to guide health professionals in selecting the most appropriate footwear to meet the specific foot risk needs of an individual with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaap J van Netten
- 1School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Peter A Lazzarini
- 1School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - David G Armstrong
- 5Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ USA
| | - Sicco A Bus
- Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Fitridge
- Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,7Vascular Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Keith Harding
- 8University Dean of Clinical Innovation, Professor of Wound Healing Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ewan Kinnear
- Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Matthew Malone
- Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,9High Risk Foot Service, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Hylton B Menz
- 10Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC Australia
| | - Byron M Perrin
- Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,11La Trobe Rural Health School, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC Australia
| | - Klaas Postema
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny Prentice
- Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,Wound Consultant, Trojan Health, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Karl-Heinz Schott
- 14School of Health and Human Sciences (Pedorthics) Southern Cross University Gold Coast Campus, Bilinga, QLD Australia
| | - Paul R Wraight
- Diabetic Foot Australia, Brisbane, QLD Australia.,15Diabetic Foot Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Treatment Adherence Intervention Studies in Dermatology and Guidance on How to Support Adherence. Am J Clin Dermatol 2017; 18:253-271. [PMID: 28188596 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-017-0253-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Adequate adherence to prescribed treatment regimens can help to break the cycle of treatment failure, disease progression and subsequent treatment escalation. Unfortunately, adherence in the treatment of skin disorders such as acne, atopic dermatitis/eczema and psoriasis is often inadequate. A review of the literature identified a number of studies that tested an intervention to improve adherence in dermatology, including the following: electronic messages and/or reminders; more frequent or 'extra' clinic visits; audio-visual and internet-based interventions; and patient support programmes and/or self-management, educational training programmes. While there is no one solution or action for improving adherence, some interventions were more successful than others. We provide practical guidance on how to support adherence based on aspects of the successful interventions identified and on our collective opinion and clinical practice experience. Holding patients accountable, providing a caring and supportive environment, raising awareness of poor adherence and helping patients build a solid medication-taking habit can help to improve adherence so that patients can experience maximal treatment benefits and desired clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|