Depth of central venous catheterization: an audit of practice in a cardiac surgical unit

Long-Term Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters: Achieving Efficiency Through Tip Position Optimization

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study assesses the influence of tunneled hemodialysis catheter tip location and lateralization on catheter-related complications, including dysfunction and catheter-related bloodstream infection.

METHODS

Using data from 162 patients who underwent catheter placement between January 2017 and December 2020, postoperative chest X-rays and clinical records were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed based on catheter removal duration and complication incidence.

RESULTS

Out of 177 catheter placements, 56 (32%) patients experienced complications during an average 530-day follow-up. Catheters placed in the superior vena cava (SVC) exhibited more severe complications with shorter dwell times compared with those in the pericavoatrial junction (pCAJ) or right atrium (RA). Moreover, complication rates were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the SVC (1.91 per 1000 catheter days) compared with the pCAJ (0.54) or RA (0.47). Lateralization (right or left internal jugular vein) did not significantly affect the complication rates (0.60 vs. 0.58; P = 0.90). However, in subgroup analysis, a significantly higher complication rate was observed for catheters with tips inserted from the left side into the SVC than for those inserted from the right side (6.6 vs. 1.5; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheters with tips in the SVC exhibited more severe complications than those in the pCAJ or RA, with left-side insertion of SVC-tipped catheters resulting in significantly higher complication rates compared with right-side insertion. These findings highlight the importance of optimal catheter tip positioning in long-term hemodialysis care to minimize complications and enhance patient outcomes.

"Optimal" Central Venous Catheter Tip Position Does Not Increase Catheter Duration: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background Central venous cannulation provides venous access in different settings. Multiple guidelines and checklists still recommend confirmation of central venous catheter (CVC) tip position using a chest radiograph. The rationale is to detect and prevent complications thus optimizing CVC placement. Our primary hypothesis is that confirmation of catheter tip position by chest radiograph is not associated with increased catheter duration. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 921 patients included. Demographic, procedure and catheter data was obtained from adult patients that placed a CVC in the operating room. The catheter tip was independently classified as "optimal" or "malpositioned" independently by two researchers. Results Data from 921 CVC placements was collected. Patients who had a post-procedure chest radiograph (n=682, 74.0%) differed from those who did not in terms of co-morbidities (p=0.030), indication for CVC (p=0.023), duration of placement (p<0.001), number of punctured veins (p=0.036) and use of ultrasound (p<0.001). There was substantial agreement between researchers when classifying CVC tip as "optimal" or "malpositioned" (κ=0.632, p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between duration or complications of "optimal" CVCs compared to unknown tip/"malpositioned" CVCs. This study showed a 99% rate of clinically redundant chest radiographs according to Pikwer's criteria for radiographic examination. Conclusion No difference was found regarding catheter duration or complications when comparing "optimal" and unknown/"malpositioned" tip. This study illustrates some consequences of post-procedure radiographs and reinforces that the risks/benefits should be weighed and that chest radiograph should not be done by routine.

Chest radiography for simplified evaluation of central venous catheter tip positioning for safe and accurate haemodynamic monitoring: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

The tip-to-carina (TC) distance on a simple chest X-ray (CXR) has proven value in the determination of correct central venous catheter (CVC) positioning. However, previous studies have mostly focused on preventing the atrial insertion of the CVC tip, and not on appropriate positioning for accurate haemodynamic monitoring. We aimed to assess whether the TC distance could detect the passage of the CVC tip into the superior vena cava (SVC) and the right atrium (RA), and to accordingly suggest cut-off reference values for these two aspects.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Single urban tertiary level academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

479 patients who underwent CXR and chest CT scan after the insertion of a CVC with a 24-hour interval during the study period.

INTERVENTION

The TC distance was measured on CXR, and the position of the CVC tip was assessed on the chest CT images. The TC distance was described as a negative or positive number if the CVC tip was above or below the carina, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses were conducted to ascertain the TC distance to detect SVC entrance and RA insertion of CVC tip.

RESULTS

The TC distance could significantly detect both SVC entrance and RA insertion (p<0.001 for both; area under curve 0.987 and 0.965, respectively), with a reference range of -6.69 to 15.61 mm.

CONCLUSION

The TC distance in CXR is a simple and precise method to confirm not only the safe placement of the CVC tip but also its optimal positioning for accurate haemodynamic monitoring.

Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Position Statement for Central Venous Catheterization and Management 2020

Background and Purpose

Short-term central venous catheterization (CVC) is one of the commonly used invasive interventions in ICU and other patient-care areas. Practice and management of CVC is not standardized, varies widely, and need appropriate guidance. Purpose of this document is to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based and up-to-date, one document source for practice and management of central venous catheterization. These recommendations are intended to be used by critical care physicians and allied professionals involved in care of patients with central venous lines.

Methods

This position statement for central venous catheterization is framed by expert committee members under the aegis of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM). Experts group exchanged and reviewed the relevant literature. During the final meeting of the experts held at the ISCCM Head Office, a consensus on all the topics was made and the recommendations for final document draft were prepared. The final document was reviewed and accepted by all expert committee members and after a process of peer-review this document is finally accepted as an official ISCCM position paper.

Modified grade system was utilized to classify the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. The draft document thus formulated was reviewed by all committee members; further comments and suggestions were incorporated after discussion, and a final document was prepared.

Results

This document makes recommendations about various aspects of resource preparation, infection control, prevention of mechanical complication and surveillance related to short-term central venous catheterization. This document also provides four appendices for ready reference and use at institutional level.

Conclusion

In this document, committee is able to make 54 different recommendations for various aspects of care, out of which 40 are strong and 14 weak recommendations. Among all of them, 42 recommendations are backed by any level of evidence, however due to paucity of data on 12 clinical questions, a consensus was reached by working committee and practice recommendations given on these topics are based on vast clinical experience of the members of this committee, which makes a useful practice point. Committee recognizes the fact that in event of new emerging evidences this document will require update, and that shall be provided in due time.

Abbreviations list

ABHR: Alcohol-based hand rub; AICD: Automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator; BSI: Blood stream infection; C/SS: CHG/silver sulfadiazine; Cath Lab: Catheterization laboratory (Cardiac Cath Lab); CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CFU: Colony forming unit; CHG: Chlorhexidine gluconate; CL: Central line; COMBUX: Comparison of Bedside Ultrasound with Chest X-ray (COMBUX study); CQI: Continuous quality improvement; CRBSI: Catheter-related blood stream infection; CUS: Chest ultrasonography; CVC: Central Venous Catheter; CXR: Chest X-ray; DTTP: Differential time to positivity; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis; ECG: Electrocardiography; ELVIS: Ethanol lock and risk of hemodialysis catheter infection in critically ill patients; ER: Emergency room; FDA: Food and Drug Administration; FV: Femoral vein; GWE: Guidewire exchange; HD catheter: Hemodialysis catheter; HTS: Hypertonic saline; ICP: Intracranial pressure; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; IDSA: Infectious Disease Society of America; IJV: Internal jugular vein; IPC: Indian penal code; IRR: Incidence rate ratio; ISCCM: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine; IV: Intravenous; LCBI: Laboratory confirmed blood stream infection; M/R: Minocycline/rifampicin; MBI-LCBI: Mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection; MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NHS: National Health Service (UK); NHSN: National Healthcare Safety Network (USA); OT: Operation Theater; PICC: Peripherally-inserted central catheter; PIV: Peripheral intravenous line; PL: Peripheral line; PVI: Povidone-iodine; RA: Right atrium; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; RR: Relative risk; SCV/SV: Subclavian vein; ScVO₂: Central venous oxygen saturation; Sn: Sensitivity; SOP: Standard operating procedure; SVC: Superior vena cava; TEE: Transesophageal echocardiography; UPP: Useful Practice Points; USG: Ultrasonography; WHO: World Health Organization

How to cite this article

Javeri Y, Jagathkar G, Dixit S, Chaudhary D, Zirpe KG, Mehta Y, et al. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Position Statement for Central Venous Catheterization and Management 2020. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 1):S6–S30.

Superior Vena Cava Port Catheter Tip Confirmation: Quantified Formula for Intravascular Catheter Length versus Anatomic Landmark Reference

BACKGROUND

Adequate tip location is crucial for intravenous port implantation because it can minimize catheter-related complications. Adequate tip location cannot be observed directly and needs to be confirmed by imaging tools. A quantified intravascular catheter length formula has been proposed and we attempt to compare its clinical effectiveness with anatomic landmark references.

METHODS

During the period from March 2012 to February 2013, 503 patients who received port implantation where implanted catheter length depended on carina level as confirmed by intraoperative fluoroscopy were assigned to Group A. From March 2013 to February 2014, 521 patients who received port implantation based on quantified intravascular catheter length formula were assigned to Group B. Clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Catheter tip location of Group A, as revealed by intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative chest film, was 1.18 ± 0.51 and 1.1 ± 1.3 cm below carina, respectively. Catheter tip location of Group B, as revealed by intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative chest film, was 1.25 ± 1.05 and 1.05 ± 1.32 cm below carina, respectively. Similar catheter tip location was identified in both groups. The functional period of implanted ports, complication rate (3.58% and 2.53%), and incidence (0.049 and 0.0506 episodes/1,000 catheter days) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantified intravascular catheter length formula can predict an adequate catheter length just as well as carina do and results in good catheter tip location. The formula could replace the clinical use of anatomic landmarks and serve as an easy tool for practitioners.

Pediatric central venous catheterization: The Role of the Aortic Valve in Defining the Superior Vena Cava-Right Atrium Junction

The aortic valve (AV) has been used as a surrogate marker for the superior vena cava-right atrium (SVC-RA) junction during the placement of central venous catheters. There is a paucity of evidence to determine whether this is a consistent finding in children. Eighty-seven computed tomography scans of the thorax acquired at local children's hospitals from April 2010 to September 2011 were retrospectively collected. The distance between the SVC-RA junction and the AV was measured by dual consensus. The cranio-caudal level of the junction and the AV were referenced to the costal cartilages (CCs) and anterior intercostal spaces (ICSs). The results confirmed that the SVC-RA junction has a variable relationship to the AV. The junction was on average 3.1 mm superior to the AV. This distance increased with age. In the <1-year-old age group, the junction was on average 1.3 mm superior to the AV (range: -6 to 11 mm). In the 1-2 years old age group: 3.5 mm (range: -8 to 15 mm). In the 3-6 years old: 3.8 mm (range: -9 to 13 mm). In the >7 years old age group: 4 mm (range: -11 to 16 mm). The surface anatomy of the SVC-RA junction was variable, ranging from the second ICS to sixth CC. The SVC-RA junction has a predictable relationship to the AV, and this can be used as an adjunct marker for accurate placement of central venous catheters except in the smallest neonates. Clin. Anat. 32:778-782, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Intra- and Extra-pericardial Lengths of the Superior Vena Cava in Vivo: Implication for the Positioning of Central Venous Catheters

To reduce the possibility of cardiac tamponade, a rare but lethal complication of central venous catheters, the tip of the central venous catheter should be located above the cephalic limit of the pericardial reflection, not only above the superior vena cava-right atrium junction. This study was performed to measure the superior vena cava lengths above and below the pericardial reflection in cardiac surgical patients. Cardiac surgical patients (n=61; 27 male), whose age [mean±SD (range)] was 47±15 (15–75) years, were studied. The intrapericardial and extrapericardial lengths, and the length of the medial duplicated part were measured separately. The whole vertical lengths of the superior vena cava on either side were calculated respectively by adding the intra-and extrapericardial and medial duplication lengths. The lateral extrapericardial was 29.1±6.5 (Mean±SD) (9–49) mm (range), and lateral extrapericardial length was 32.6±6.9 (20–53) mm. The medial extrapericardial length was 23.3±5.0 (11–39) mm, medical duplicated length was 7.2±3.3 (4–20) mm, and medial intrapericardial was 28.3±7.0 (20–52) mm. The averaged superior vena cava length of both sides was 60.3±9.0 (44.5–90) mm. Almost half of the superior vena cava was found to be within the pericardium and half out. This information may be helpful in deciding how far a central venous catheter should be withdrawn beyond the superior vena cava-right atrial junction during right atrial electrocardiographic guided insertion, and in the prediction of optimal central venous catheter insertion depth.

Cardiac tamponade: a rare complication of central venous catheter – a clinical case report

The extensive use of central venous catheters (CVC) in a hospital environment leads to increased iatrogenic complications, as more catheters are used enclosed and its maintenance is prolonged. Several complications are known to be related to central venous catheter, of which the uncommon cardiac tamponade (CT), hardly recognized and associated with high mortality.

We present a clinical case, with favorable outcome, of a patient who developed a CT 17 days after CVC placement, and try to reflect on the measures that can be taken to reduce its incidence, as well as the therapeutic approaches to practice in the presence of a suspected CT.

A comparative study of landmark-based topographic method versus the formula method for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian central venous catheters

Background and Aims:

Subclavian central venous catheterisation (CVC) is employed in critically ill patients requiring long-term central venous access. There is no gold standard for estimating their depth of insertion. In this study, we compared the landmark topographic method with the formula technique for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian CVCs.

Methods:

Two hundred and sixty patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit requiring subclavian CVC were randomly assigned to either topographic method or formula method (130 in each group). Catheter tip position in relation to the carina was measured on a post-procedure chest X-ray. The primary endpoint was the need for catheter repositioning. Mann–Whitney test and Chi-square test was performed for statistical analysis using SPSS for windows version 18.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Results:

Nearly, half the catheters positioned by both the methods were situated >1 cm below the carina and required repositioning.

Conclusion:

Both the techniques were not effective in estimating the approximate depth of insertion of right subclavian CVCs.

Central venous catheter tip migration due to tracheal extubation: a prospective randomized study

Considerable numbers of patients undergo central venous catheterization (CVC) under mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that the return of spontaneous breathing and tracheal extubation could be associated with distal CVC tip migration towards intracardiac positions due to decreasing intrathoracic pressures and subsequent readjustment of mediastinal organs. Patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were randomized for right or left internal jugular vein (IJV) CVC placement under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. CVC tips were positioned at the cavoatrial junction and measured at the time of placement, postoperatively under mechanical ventilation, and after tracheal extubation until 48 h after surgery. Measurement methods included intravascular electrocardiography (ECG) P-wave amplitude, transesophageal echocardiography, and chest radiography (CXR). Out of 70 patients, 60 were eligible for final statistical analysis (31 right and 29 left IJV CVC). According to ECG interpretation, CVC tip positions remained below the pericardiac reflection point in the distal superior vena cava over the course of the three measurement intervals. The ECG revealed significant proximal migration of CVC tips from the time of placement to the time of tracheal extubation (1.19 ± 0.55 vs. 0.62 ± 0.31 mV; P < 0.001). A CXR using CVC tip to carina distances revealed no significant tip migrations in the time between postoperative assessment and following tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 1.7 vs. 5.3 ± 1.5 cm; P = 0.196). In patients with CVCs positioned at the cavoatrial junction, tracheal extubation was not associated with significant postoperative CVC tip malposition, but tended to undergo proximal migration. This trend should be considered particularly in left-sided thoracocervical puncture approaches to avoid unfavorable CVC tip positions.

Depth of insertion of right internal jugular central venous catheter: Comparison of topographic and formula methods

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are inserted in many critically ill patients, but there is no gold standard in estimating their approximate depth of insertion. Many techniques have been described in literature. In this study, we compare the topographic method with the standard formula technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

260 patients, in whom central venous catheterization was warranted, were randomly assigned to either topographic method or formula method (130 in each group). The position of the CVC tip in relation to carina was measured on a postprocedure chest X-ray. The primary endpoint was the need for catheter repositioning.

RESULTS

The majority of the CVCs tips positioned by the formula method were situated below the carina, and 68% of these catheters required repositioning after obtaining postprocedure chest X-ray (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The topographic method is superior to formula approach in estimating the depth of insertion of right internal jugular CVCs.

[Cardiac tamponade: a rare complication of central venous catheter - a clinical case report]

The extensive use of central venous catheters (CVC) in a hospital environment leads to increased iatrogenic complications, as more catheters are used enclosed and its maintenance is prolonged. Several complications are known to be related to central venous catheter, of which the uncommon cardiac tamponade (CT), hardly recognized and associated with high mortality. We present a clinical case, with favorable outcome, of a patient who developed a CT 17 days after CVC placement, and try to reflect on the measures that can be taken to reduce its incidence, as well as the therapeutic approaches to practice in the presence of a suspected CT.

Dose Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Precisely Predict Catheter Tip Location via Superior Vena Cava Route?

Adequate catheter tip location is crucial for functional intravenous port and central venous catheter. Numerous complications were reported because of catheter migration that caused by inadequate tip location. Different guidelines recommend different ideal locations without consensus. Another debate is actual movement of intravascular portion of implanted catheter. From literature review, the catheter migrated peripherally an average of 20 mm on the erect chest radiographs. In this study, we want to verify the actual presentation of catheter movement within a vessel and try to find a quantitative catheter length model to recommend.From March 2012 to March 2013, 346 patients were included into this prospective cohort study. We collect clinical data from medical record and utilized picture archiving and communication system to measure all image parameters. Statistical analysis was utilized to identify the risk factors for catheter migration.The nonmigration group had 221 patients (63.9%); 67 (19.4%) patients were classified into the peripheral migration group; and 58 (16.8%) patients were classified into the central migration group. Patients with short height (P = 0.03), larger superior vena cava (SVC) diameters at the brachiocephalic vein confluence site (P = 0.02), and longer implanted catheter length (P = 0.0004) had greater risks for central migration. We utilized regression curve for further analysis and height (centimeters)/10 had moderate correlation distances from the entry vessel to the carina.Although intravascular movement of catheter was exist in implanted catheter, the intraoperative fluoroscopy could provide accurate catheter tip location in 63.9% patients. Additional length of catheter implantation seems unnecessary in 80.6% patients. Patients with short height, larger SVC diameters at the brachiocephalic vein confluence site had greater risk for catheter central movement. Height/10 may be consider as reference length of implantation for inexperience surgeon and precise implantation length could be adjust under guidance of fluoroscopy.

Use of vertebral body units to locate the cavoatrial junction for optimum central venous catheter tip positioning

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheter (CVC) placement plays an important role in clinical practice; however, optimal positioning of the CVC tip remains a controversial issue. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of vertebral body unit (VBUs), to locate the cavoatrial junction (CAJ), for optimal CVC tip placement based on chest radiography (CXR) using the carina as a landmark.

METHODS

524 patients who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and CXR were included. The position of the CAJ was identified using VBUs, and the efficacy of VBUs for locating the CAJ with the carina as a landmark was analysed using multiple regression analysis. A VBU was defined as the distance between two adjacent vertebral bodies, including the inter-vertebral disk space.

RESULTS

The mean (sd) distance from the carina to the superior CAJ was 54.3 (9.7) mm on CTA; the mean distance in VBUs at the level of the carina was 21.4 (1.7) mm on CTA and 22.6 (2.1) mm on CXR. The mean CAJ position was 2.5 VBUs below the carina on CTA and 2.4 VBUs below on CXR with 95% limits of agreement between -0.6 and +0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

The position of the CVC tip in relation to the carina can be described using the thoracic spine as an internal ruler, and the position of the CAJ in adults was reliably estimated to be 2.4 VBUs below the carina.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

KCT0001319.

Evaluation of the Correct Position of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Anatomical Landmark vs. Electrocardiographic Technique

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to verify as early as possible the correct positioning of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip in order to reduce complications due to possible malpositioning. The ECG-guided technique proved to be reliable, easy to carry out, straightforward, low-cost and allows us to recognize an incorrect or a suboptimal positioning throughout the procedure. The purpose of this study is to compare two methods used during the PICC insertion so as to prevent catheter malpositioning; the first study estimates the catheter length by the landmark method (based on cutaneous anatomical landmarks, CALs) with the addition of the postprocedural verification of tip location by chest X-Ray (CxR), whereas the second method of intraprocedural tip location is based on the observation of the morphological variations of the P wave (ECG-guided technique) with the addition of the postprocedural verification by CxR.

Methods

From 2010 to 2012, 90 PICCs were positioned, 48 using the anatomical landmarks and 42 using the ECG technique.

Results

Twenty-five percent of the catheters positioned with the anatomical landmark technique did not reach the correct position of the tip in SVC; of these, 6.25% were placed in an aberrant position and others in a suboptimal position. Of the 42 PICCs positioned with the ECG technique, only in three cases (equal to 7.14%), a suboptimal position of the tip was observed, whereas there was no case of aberrant positioning.

Conclusions

The ECG technique represents an accurate, low-cost and safe technique to verify the correct positioning of the tip. The use of the ECG allowed a more correct positioning in terms of catheter tip-carina distance and catheter tip-tracheobronchial angle, and in no patient was it necessary to place a catheter again.

Estimation of catheter insertion depth during ultrasound-guided subclavian venous catheterization

BACKGROUND

Several methods have been used to predict the optimal depth of central venous catheter (CVC) tip position when using the anatomical landmark technique. In the present study, we devised a simple formula to predict CVC depth using ultrasound images and chest X-ray (CXR) in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided subclavian venous catheterization.

METHODS

Central venous catheterization via the subclavian vein was performed under ultrasound guidance. We measured five parameters to determine the distance between the needle insertion point and the CVC tip: insertion point to vein puncture point (A), insertion point to a skin point indicating a vertical position above the vein puncture point (B), insertion point to the clavicular notch (C), clavicular notch to the carina (D), and catheter tip to carina (E). Catheter insertion depth was then determined as follows: calculated catheter insertion depth = A - B + C + D; actual catheter insertion depth = (A - B + C + D) + E.

RESULTS

The calculated CVC insertion depth (mean ± SD) was 15.4 ± 1.5 cm from the needle insertion point to the carina [95 % confidence interval (CI) 15.0-15.9 cm]. Actual depth was 15.4 ± 1.5 cm (95 % CI 15.0-15.9 cm). No significant difference was observed between the calculated CVC insertion depth and the actual distance from the needle insertion point to the carina (p = 0.940).

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate length of a CVC inserted through the subclavian vein can be estimated by a formula using ultrasound images and CXR.

Clinical guidelines on central venous catheterisation. Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Safe and reliable venous access is mandatory in modern health care, but central venous catheters (CVCs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, This paper describes current Swedish guidelines for clinical management of CVCs The guidelines supply updated recommendations that may be useful in other countries as well. Literature retrieval in the Cochrane and Pubmed databases, of papers written in English or Swedish and pertaining to CVC management, was done by members of a task force of the Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Consensus meetings were held throughout the review process to allow all parts of the guidelines to be embraced by all contributors. All of the content was carefully scored according to criteria by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We aimed at producing useful and reliable guidelines on bleeding diathesis, vascular approach, ultrasonic guidance, catheter tip positioning, prevention and management of associated trauma and infection, and specific training and follow-up. A structured patient history focused on bleeding should be taken prior to insertion of a CVCs. The right internal jugular vein should primarily be chosen for insertion of a wide-bore CVC. Catheter tip positioning in the right atrium or lower third of the superior caval vein should be verified for long-term use. Ultrasonic guidance should be used for catheterisation by the internal jugular or femoral veins and may also be used for insertion via the subclavian veins or the veins of the upper limb. The operator inserting a CVC should wear cap, mask, and sterile gown and gloves. For long-term intravenous access, tunnelled CVC or subcutaneous venous ports are preferred. Intravenous position of the catheter tip should be verified by clinical or radiological methods after insertion and before each use. Simulator-assisted training of CVC insertion should precede bedside training in patients. Units inserting and managing CVC should have quality assertion programmes for implementation and follow-up of routines, teaching, training and clinical outcome. Clinical guidelines on a wide range of relevant topics have been introduced, based on extensive literature retrieval, to facilitate effective and safe management of CVCs.

Defining Central venous Line Position in Children: Tips for the Tip

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to analyse literature related to the position of centrally inserted central venous catheters and to review topics related to assessment of tip position of those catheters in children. Applications of specific techniques to PICCs (Periferally Inserted Central Catheters) and umbilical venous catheter will also be reviewed.

Methods

Analysis of 68 original manuscripts, 42 specifically related to the paediatric population, 26 related to the adult population. The papers analysed were published between 1949 and 2014; all articles were in English except one in Italian and one in German.

Results

From the analysed literature, most of the guidelines recommend tip positioning at a level between the superior vena cava and the right atrium. Several methods have been described to evaluate tip position in the paediatric population, but none of those is considered completely reliable. The standard methods used to identify catheter tip position are radiography and fluoroscopy, but no specific landmark can be recommended in the paediatric population. The ultrasonographic approach has been investigated mainly for PICCs positioning in the neonatal population. The electrocardiographic method has been evaluated in the general paediatric population.

Conclusions

No specific recommendation can be given due to the low level of evidence. Ultrasound and ECG (electrocardiogram) techniques are a potential alternative to chest X-ray and further studies should be implemented to establish them. A wider application of these techniques may reduce neonatal and paediatric exposure to radiations and additionally reduce costs.

A retrospective clinical study: complications of totally implanted central venous access ports

Background

When managing patients who require repeated venous access, gaining a viable intravenous route has been problematic. To improve the situation, various studies on techniques for venous access have been conducted. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of complications following totally implanted central venous access port (TICVAP) insertion.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 163 patients, from December 2008 to March 2013. The occurrence of complications was studied in three separate periods of catheter use: the intraoperative period, postoperative period, and period during the treatment.

Results

A total of 165 cases of TICVAP insertions involving 156 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 35 complications (21%) overall. Among these, 31 cases of complications (19%) occurred during the treatment period and the other 4 cases were intraoperative and postoperative complications (2%). There were no statistically significant differences in age and gender of the patients between the two groups to be risk factors (p=0.147, p=0.08). Past history of chemotherapy, initial laboratory findings, and the locations of TICVAP insertion also showed no statistical significance as risk factors (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Because the majority of complications occurred after port placement and during treatment, meticulous care and management and appropriate education are necessary when using TICVAPs.

Safety of a totally implantable central venous port system with percutaneous subclavian vein access

BACKGROUND

The role of totally implantable central venous port (TICVP) system is increasing. Implantation performed by radiologist with ultrasound-guided access of vein and fluoroscope-guided positioning of catheter is widely accepted nowadays. In this article, we summarized our experience of TICVP system by surgeon and present the success and complication rate of this surgical method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2009 and December 2010, 245 ports were implanted in 242 patients by surgeon. These procedures were performed with one small skin incision and subcutaneous puncture of subclavian vein. Patient's profiles, indications of port system, early and delayed complications, and implanted period were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 82 men and 160 women with mean age of 55.74. Port system was implanted on right chest in 203, and left chest in 42 patients. There was no intraoperative complication. Early complications occurred in 11 patients (4.49%) including malposition of catheter tip in 6, malfunction of catheter in 3, and port site infection in 2. Late complication occurred in 12 patients (4.90%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical insertion of TICVP system with percutaneous subclavian venous access is safe procedures with lower complications. Careful insertion of system and skilled management would decrease complication incidence.

Impact of phase of respiration on central venous catheter tip position

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of the phase of respiration on CVC tip position using cross-sectional imaging.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the CT scans of 24 consecutive patients (eight men and 16 women, mean age 56.3 years, range 18-79) who underwent a CT scan protocol that includes both imaging of the thorax in inspiration and expiration. Only patients with a central venous catheter and absence of any substantial pulmonary pathology that might affect lung volumes were included. Measurements of the catheter tip location and central venous structures were obtained from inspiratory and expiratory phase images in each patient and compared using the paired <i>t</i> test.

RESULTS

The length of the SVC and superior mediastinum were significantly longer during inspiration compared to expiration (9 mm and 7 mm respectively, P<0.001 for both). The distance between the superior and inferior cavo-atrial junction did not change significantly with respiration. The catheter tip location moved on average 9 mm (range 0-25 mm) cephalad during inspiration compared to expiration (P=0.001) in relation to the superior cavoatrial junction. The amount of catheter tip movement correlated significantly with the degree of diaphragmatic excursion with respiration (R=0.58). During inspiration, the cavo-atrial junction was on average 11 mm inferior to the right cardiomediastinal angle observed on radiography, but was nearly identical during expiration (R=0.78, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The central catheter tip position varied significantly with respiratory motion, with a mean excursion of 9 mm. The right cardiomediastinal border demonstrated a strong correlation with the actual location of the superior cavo-atrial junction in expiration, but not in inspiration.

Optimal prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth on a routine chest x-ray

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac tamponade is a serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. The position of the carina has been shown to be near the pericardial reflection and can easily be identified as a landmark on routine chest x-ray (CXR). The purpose of this study was to show a simple way to predict optimal CVC depth, thereby facilitating safe positioning of the CVC tip.

METHODS

Subjects included 119 inpatients undergoing gastroenterologic surgery. Central venous catheterization was performed through the right internal jugular vein or the right subclavian vein. The insertion depth was measured. Postoperatively, the CVC tip position was confirmed by CXR and the distance between the CVC tip and the carina was measured. We compared the "original measurement" up to the carina from the insertion point with the "calculated measurement" derived by adding half the length of the right clavicle and the vertical length between the sternal head of the right clavicle and the carina on the CXR.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the original measurement and the calculated measurement when performed through the internal jugular vein and the subclavian vein.

CONCLUSION

The appropriate length of CVC inserted through the right internal jugular vein or right subclavian vein could be estimated by the calculated measurement of adding half the length of the right clavicle and the vertical length between the sternal head of the right clavicle and the carina.

Precision in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement: A Review of the Literature

Background: Long term venous catheters have been used to deliver specialized therapies since 1968. The ideal tip position of a central venous catheter provides reliable venous access with optimal therapeutic delivery, while minimizing short-and long-term complications. Ideal position limits have evolved and narrowed over time, making successful placement difficult and unreliable when depending exclusively on the landmark technique.

Objective: To review and analyze contemporary literature and calculate an overall accuracy rate for first attempt placement of a PICC catheter in the ideal tip position.

Methods: Key PICC placement terms were used to search the database PubMED-indexed for MEDLINE in June and October, 2009. The selection of studies required: a patient cohort without tip placement guidance technology; a documented landmark technique to place catheter tips; data documenting initial catheter placement and, that the lower third of the SVC and the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) were included in the placement criteria. With few exceptions, articles written between 1993 and 2009 met the stated selection criteria. A composite of outcomes associated with tip placement was analyzed, and an overall percent proficiency of accurate catheter tip placement calculated.

Results: Nine studies in eight articles met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. Rates of first placement success per study ranged from 39% to 75%, with the majority (7/9) being single center studies. The combined overall proficiency of these studies calculated as a weighted average was 45.87%.

Optimal positioning of right-sided internal jugular venous catheters: comparison of intra-atrial electrocardiography versus Peres' formula

Central venous catheters are routinely placed in patients undergoing major surgeries where expected volume and hemodynamic disturbances are likely consequences. The incorrect positioning may give false central venous pressure (CVP) readings leading to incorrect volume replacement and other serious complications. 50 American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade II-IV patients aged 18-60 years were selected for right-sided internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization using Seldinger's technique. In group A, central venous catheterization was done under electrocardiography (ECG) guidance. In group B, the catheter was inserted blindly using Peres' formula of “height (in cm)/10”. The position of the tip of central venous catheter was confirmed radiologically by postoperative chest X-ray. 92% of patients in group A had radiologically correct positioning of catheter tip i.e. above the carina, while in group B 48% patients had over-insertion of the catheter in to the right atrium. Intra-atrial ECG technique to judge correct tip positioning is simple and economical. It can determine the exact position intraoperatively and can justify a delayed postoperative chest X-ray to confirm CVC line tip placement.

Impact of quality management monitoring and intervention on central venous catheter dysfunction in the outpatient chemotherapy infusion setting

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of maintaining and analyzing a quality-management database while investigating a subjectively perceived increase in the incidence of tunneled catheter and port dysfunction in a cohort of oncology outpatients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 152 patients undergoing lytic therapy (2-4 mg alteplase) of a malfunctioning indwelling central venous catheter (CVC) from January through June 2004 at a single cancer center in the United States were included in a quality-management database. Patients were categorized by time to device failure and the initial method of catheter placement (surgery vs interventional radiology). Data were analyzed after 3 months, and areas of possible improvement were identified and acted upon. Three months of follow-up data were then collected and similarly analyzed.

RESULTS

In a 6-month period, 152 patients treated for catheter malfunction received a total of 276 doses of lytic therapy. A 3-month interim analysis revealed a disproportionately high rate (34%) of early catheter malfunction (ECM; <30 days from placement). Postplacement radiographs demonstrated suboptimal catheter positioning in 67% of these patients, all of whom had surgical catheter placement. There was a 50% absolute decrease in the number of patients presenting with catheter malfunction in the period from April through June (P < .001). Evaluation of postplacement radiographs in these patients demonstrated a 50% decrease in the incidence of suboptimal positioning (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal positioning was likely responsible for some, but not all, cases of ECM. Maintenance of a quality-management database is a relatively simple intervention that can have a clear and important impact on the quality and cost of patient care.

A Study of the Relationship of the Superior Vena Cava to the Bony Landmarks of the Sternum in the Supine Adult: Implications for Magnetic Guidance Systems

This study was a retrospective investigation of computed tomography (CT) images of an Australian adult hospital population. These images were used to evaluate the spatial relationships of the superior vena cava (SVC) to the midsagittal line, the sternal paracoronal plane, and commonly used landmarks of the sternum. Consistent relationships were found between the long axis of the SVC and both the midsagittal line and sternal paracoronal plane. When the sternal paracoronal plane was used as the plane of reference, the angle of Louis was found to approximate the SVC in 99.5% of cases, and the right 2nd intercostal space approximated the SVC in 94% of cases. Constraints on the use of landmarks are discussed with regard to magnetic guidance systems for catheter tracking.

CT Angiography of the Superior Vena Cava: Normative Values and Implications for Central Venous Catheter Position

PURPOSE

To determine normative data for radiographic landmarks of the superior vena cava (SVC) and the location of the junction of the SVC with the right atrium for use in the placement of central venous catheters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 112 pulmonary computed tomographic (CT) angiograms obtained in seven men and seven women from each decade of life between the ages of 20 and 99 years. For each patient, the length of the SVC was measured from its origin to the cavoatrial junction. The distances from the carina and right tracheobronchial angle to the cavoatrial junction and the origin of the SVC were also measured. Interobserver variation in choosing the location of the carina and tracheobronchial angle was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean length (+/-standard deviation) of the SVC was 70.7 mm +/- 14.1. The mean distance from the superior margin of the SVC to the carina was 30.4 mm +/- 11.2, from the carina to the cavoatrial junction 40.3 mm +/- 13.6, from the superior margin of the SVC to the right tracheobronchial angle 21.7 mm +/- 10.8, and from the right tracheobronchial angle to the cavoatrial junction 49.0 mm +/- 13.6. There was a statistically significant difference in interobserver variation in selecting the location of the right tracheobronchial angle as compared to choosing the carina.

CONCLUSION

Placement of the central venous catheter tip at or just below the level of the carina during inspiration ensures placement in the SVC. Placement of the central venous catheter tip approximately 4 cm below the carina will result in placement near the cavoatrial junction.

Radiological Interventions for Correction of Central Venous Port Catheter Migrations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiological-interventional central venous port catheter corrections in migrated/malpositioned catheter tips.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with migrated/malpositioned port catheter tips were included in this retrospective analysis. To visualize the catheter patency a contrast-enhanced port catheter series was performed, followed by transfemoral port catheter correction with various 5-F angiographic catheters (pigtail; Sos Omni), gooseneck snares, or combinations thereof.

RESULTS

One patient showed spontaneous reposition of the catheter tip. In 27 of 29 patients (93%), radiological-interventional port catheter correction was successful. In two patients port catheter malposition correction was not possible, because of the inability to catch either the catheter tip or the catheter in its course, possibly due to fibrin sheath formation with attachment of the catheter to the vessel wall. No disconnection or port catheter dysfunction was observed after correction.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in migrated catheter tips radiological-interventional port catheter correction is a minimally invasive alternative to port extraction and reimplantation. In patients with a fibrin sheath and/or thrombosis port catheter correction is often more challenging.

Radiological Interventions for Correction of Central Venous Port Catheter Migrations

The purpose of the study is to evaluate radiological-interventional central venous port catheter corrections in migrated/malpositioned catheter tips. Thirty patients with migrated/malpositioned port catheter tips were included in this retrospective analysis. To visualize the catheter patency, a contrast-enhanced port catheter series was performed, followed by transfemoral port catheter correction with various 5F angiographic catheters (pigtail, Sos Omni), goose-neck snare, or combinations thereof. One patient showed spontaneous reposition of the catheter tip. In 27 of 29 patients (93%), radiological-interventional port catheter correction was successful. In two patients, port catheter malposition correction was not possible because of the inability to catch either the catheter tip or the catheter in its course, possibly due to fibrin sheath formation with attachment of the catheter to the vessel wall. No disconnection or port catheter dysfunction was observed after correction. In migrated catheter tips, radiological-interventional port catheter correction is a minimally invasive alternative to port extraction and reimplantation. In patients with a fibrin sheath and/or thrombosis, port catheter correction is often more challenging.

A case of fatal cardiac tamponade during hemodialysis

A 27-year-old Hispanic man with a history of hypertension and end-stage renal disease for 4 years became unresponsive, apneic, and pulseless during hemodialysis. During his 4 year period on dialysis, vascular access had become increasingly difficult and ultimately a transhepatic catheter had been placed 9 months prior to this event. Resuscitation was unsuccessful. At autopsy, death was determined to be due to cardiac tamponade secondary to perforation of the right atrium by the transhepatic catheter. Cardiac tamponade is a rare cause of sudden death during hemodialysis with a long-standing catheter.

Correct depth of insertion of right internal jugular central venous catheters based on external landmarks: avoiding the right atrium

OBJECTIVE

Radiographically, a central venous catheter (CVC) tip should lie at the level of the right tracheobronchial angle. Precalculation of length of CVC insertion may avoid unnecessary catheter malposition. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a method of CVC positioning, based on external topographic landmarks.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital, single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients scheduled for surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were allocated for insertion of the catheter through the right internal jugular vein to either a fixed, predetermined, 15-cm length (n = 50) or to a depth calculated topographically (n = 50) by drawing a line from the level of the thyroid notch to the sternal manubrium. The catheter was repositioned if its tip was situated >5 cm above the carina or >1 cm below it. The distance from the catheter tip to the carina was measured. The main study endpoint was the need for catheter repositioning.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two percent of patients required repositioning in the topographic group compared with 78% in the 15-cm length group (p < 0.001). No patient in the topographic group and 10 patients (20%) in the 15-cm group had the catheter placed in the right atrium (p < 0.05). The mean distance from the CVC tip to the carina was 2.9 +/- 1.4 cm above the carina in the topographic group and 1.9 +/- 1.1 cm below the carina in the 15-cm length group (p < 0.001). No patient had a too proximally placed catheter. Insertion lengths in the topographic group ranged between 9 and 12.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended to use the topographic approach in deciding CVC depth with right internal jugular CVC placement.

Implication of the anatomy of the pericardial reflection on positioning of central venous catheters

OBJECTIVE

Central venous catheterization is associated with a significant incidence of complications (5%-20%). The incidence of perforation is approximately 0.25% to 0.4%. To prevent cardiac tamponade associated with a high risk of death, Food and Drug Administration guidelines state that the tip of a central venous catheter (CVC) should not be placed in, or allowed to migrate into, the heart. Therefore, in order to prevent cardiac tamponade, a catheter should be placed above the pericardial reflection. Thus, the intrapericardial length of the superior vena cava (SVC) was studied. Neither the pericardial reflection nor the exact entrance to the right atrium (RA) can be identified by chest x-ray. The goal of this study was to evaluate the variability of the intrapericardial section in relation to the SVC.

DESIGN

Observational study.

INTERVENTIONS

The absolute length of the SVC, the upper edge of the pericardial reflection on the SVC, and the lateral and the medial intrapericardial sections of the SVC were recorded and statistically analyzed.

SETTING

Medical school: dissecting room at the Department of Anatomy.

STUDY POPULATION

Eighteen formalin-preserved adult cadavers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The median lengths measured were as follows: total SVC, 61 mm; intrapericardial section of the medial SVC, 32.5 mm; and lateral SVC, 20.5 mm. The intrapericardial section was related to the total length of the SVC on both sides (Spearman rank order, p < 0.05). The median difference of the SVC covered with pericardium between the lateral and medial side was 11 mm (range, 5-21). In 15 of 18 cadavers, the pericardial reflection ran within the medial third of the SVC. The lower third of the SVC was regularly covered by the pericardium. The duplication of the pericardium crossed the SVC in the medial third at a diagonal to horizontal angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheters ending below the pericardial reflection, hence positioned in the caudal third of the SVC, are likely to run along the long axis of the vein and the risk for perforation is minimized. Therefore, the authors recommend placing all catheters below the pericardial reflection. According to the present data, CVCs placed approximately 30 mm above the RA border, thus complying with the Food and Drug Administration guidelines, still may have their tips positioned below the pericardial reflection. In this position, pericardial tamponade still may occur. Perforation above the pericardial reflection will result in a hemo- or hydrothorax/mediastinum. A bedside method to determine the position of the CVC with respect to the pericardial reflection (eg, electrocardiographic guidance) should be used.

The carina as a landmark for central venous catheter placement in small children

Central venous devices are frequently used in children to monitor haemodynamic status, to administer fluids, medication, parenteral nutrition and for blood sampling. Life-threatening complications that may occur on insertion if the central venous catheter (CVC) is misplaced, are cardiac tamponade or a hydro-/haemopericardium. There is still controversy over the optimum catheter tip position in paediatric patients, whether to place the CVC tip in the superior vena cava, outside the pericardial boundaries or in the right atrium. However, the exact location of the pericardium cannot be seen on a normal chest x-ray. The carina is a radiographic marker for CVC placement, suggested on the basis of studies with conserved and fresh adult cadavers. In order to confirm this landmark for children, the present study was performed with 31 fresh cadavers of small children (mean age 12.5+/-3.4 months) that had been selected for autopsy in the Institute of Legal Medicine. Results clearly demonstrate that the carina was 0.5+/-0.04 cm above the pericardial duplication as it transversed the SVC. In no infant cadaver was the carina inferior to the pericardium. Thus, the results are analogous to those in adults and confirm that the carina is a simple anatomical-radiological landmark, superior to the pericardial reflection, that can be used to identify the placement of CVC even in newborn and small children.

Central venous catheters: the role of radiology

The insertion and management of long-term venous catheters have long been the province of anaesthetists, intensive care physicians and surgeons. Radiologists are taking an increasing role in the insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) because of their familiarity with the imaging equipment and their ability to manipulate catheters and guide-wires. The radiological management of the complications of CVCs has also expanded as a result. This article reviews the role of radiology in central venous access, covering the detection and management of their complications.

Usefulness of the carina as a radiographic landmark for central venous catheter placement in paediatric patients † †Presented, in part, at the 2005 Annual Meeting of European Society of Anaesthesiologists, Vienna, Austria

BACKGROUND

Several reports have proposed radiographic landmarks for the proper positioning of central venous catheters (CVC). The carina is one of the proposed landmarks in adults. Here, we evaluate the possibility of using the carina as a radiographic landmark for the identification of proper positioning of the CVC tip in paediatric patients.

METHODS

We studied 57 right internal jugular vein catheterizations in infants and children undergoing surgery for the treatment of congenital heart disease. After placing the CVC tip at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium (SVC-RA junction) via intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography, and by taking postoperative anterior-posterior chest radiographs, we measured the longitudinal distance from the carina to the SVC-RA junction, using the Picture Archiving and Communicating System.

RESULTS

The average distance between the carina and the SVC-RA junction was 1.5 cm (95% CI 1.3-1.8 cm). No catheter tip was above the carina. Although there was no particular relationship between this distance and the patient's age, height, or weight, the distance between the carina and the SVC-RA junction tended to be more variable in younger and smaller children.

CONCLUSIONS

The carina can be used as a radiographic landmark for the proper CVC tip placement in paediatric patients. If the tip of the CVC is not distal to the carina the chances are minute that it is in the right atrium.

Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters without Fluoroscopy in Children: Initial Catheter Tip Position

PURPOSE

To determine how often placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) without imaging guidance results in an initially correct central venous catheter tip location.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the hospital's institutional review board, which waived the requirement for informed consent. In a children's hospital, 843 PICCs were placed in 698 patients (age range, 0 days to 26 years; mean, 6.9 years) during a 14-month study period. All PICCs were placed by a specialized team of PICC nurses and interventional radiology technologists in an angiography suite with the supervision of pediatric interventional radiologists. All catheters were threaded blindly to a previously estimated length by either a PICC nurse or a pediatric interventional radiologist, according to National Association of Vascular Access Networks guidelines, and the initial PICC tip location was then determined by means of spot fluoroscopy. PICC tips were regarded as central if they resided anywhere within the superior vena cava (SVC). All catheters were then manipulated with intermittent fluoroscopic guidance to achieve a final central position in the distal third of the SVC. A chi2 test was used to compare initial and final PICC tip locations according to patient age, catheter size, accessed vein, and need for radiologist assistance. A t test was used to compare procedure time with and without radiologist assistance.

RESULTS

Analysis included 843 consecutively placed pediatric PICCs, of which 723 (85.8%) had a noncentral initial PICC tip position and required additional manipulation. After catheter repositioning performed with intermittent fluoroscopic guidance, a final central PICC tip location was achieved in 760 PICCs (90.2%).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric PICC placement without fluoroscopic guidance required catheter manipulation of initial PICC tip position in 723 cases (85.8%). PICC placement with fluoroscopic guidance is highly successful, and the authors believe it is best performed in an angiography suite.

Relationship between Chest Port Catheter Tip Position and Port Malfunction after Interventional Radiologic Placement

PURPOSE

The relationship between catheter tip position of implanted subcutaneous chest ports and subsequent port malfunction was investigated. Tip movement from initial supine position to subsequent erect position was also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent imaging-guided internal jugular chest port placement between July 2001 and May 2003 were identified with use of a quality-assurance database. Sixty-two patients were included in the study (22 men and 40 women), with a mean age of 58 years (range, 27-81 years). Catheter tip location on the intraprocedural chest radiograph was determined with use of two methods. First, the distance from the right tracheobronchial angle (TBA) was recorded (TBA distance). Second, tip location was classified into six anatomic regions: 1, internal jugular veins; 2, brachiocephalic veins; 3, superior vena cava (SVC; n = 11); 4, SVC/right atrial junction (n = 22); 5, upper half of right atrium (n = 25); and 6, lower half of right atrium (n = 4). For the duration of follow-up, catheter tip location was documented, as were all episodes of catheter malfunction.

RESULTS

Patients with catheter tips initially placed in position 3 had a higher risk of port malfunction (four of 11; 36%) than patients with catheter tips located in position 5 (two of 25; 8%). This difference narrowly fell short of statistical significance (P =.057). When comparing intraprocedural chest radiographs to the first erect chest radiographs, significant upward tip movement was noted. The tips migrated cephalad an average of 20 mm (P =.003) and 1.0 position units (P =.001).

DISCUSSION

Catheter tips placed in the SVC tended to have a greater risk of port malfunction compared with those positioned in the right atrium. Chest ports migrated cephalad between the supine and erect positions.

Applied anatomy of the superior vena cava—the carina as a landmark to guide central venous catheter placement

BACKGROUND

Cardiac tamponade is a serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. Current guidelines strongly advise that the CVC tip should be located in the superior vena cava (SVC) and outside the pericardial sac. This may be difficult to verify as the exact location of the pericardium cannot be seen on a normal chest x-ray. The carina is an alternative radiographic marker for correct CVC placement, suggested on the basis of studies of embalmed cadavers.

METHODS

We set out to confirm this radiographic landmark in 39 fresh cadavers (age 58.4 (3.4) (mean and SE) yr) and to compare the results with those from ethanol-formalin-fixed cadavers.

RESULTS

We found that the carina was 0.8 (0.05) cm above the pericardial sac as it transverses the SVC. In no case was the carina inferior to the pericardial reflection and our study confirmed the previous findings. All the measured distances were significantly greater in fresh cadavers.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm that the carina is a reliable, simple anatomical landmark that can be identified in vivo for the correct placement of CVCs outside the boundaries of the pericardial sac.

Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy

There is continuing debate among physicians, nurses, and federal regulatory agencies regarding the correct position for the tip of a central venous catheter. The traditional approach has been to place the catheter tip within the superior vena cava. However, many interventionalists believe that the performance and durability of the catheter will be improved by positioning the catheter tip within the upper right atrium. Recently, this variability in clinical practice has become an increasingly divisive issue among physicians who insert these catheters and nurses who use them. This article is intended to elucidate the controversial issues and provide a brief review of the extensive literature on this important topic.