Headache in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma before and after transsphenoidal surgery - a prospective study

PURPOSE

To study the long-term effect of transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) on headache in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) and identify factors predicting headache relief following TSS.

METHODS

We evaluated headache in 101 consecutive patients with NFPA who underwent TSS from September 2015 to December 2021, preoperatively and 12-months post-surgery, by using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Health-related quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).

RESULTS

Of 101 patients, 27 (27%) experienced disabling preoperative headache. Among these, the median total MIDAS score improved from 60 (interquartile range (IQR): 19-140) to 10 (IQR: 0-49) (P = 0.004). Additionally, headache frequency over a 90-day period decreased from 45 (IQR: 25-83) to 6 (IQR: 3-36) days (P = 0.002), and headache intensity decreased from 5 (IQR: 4-7) to 4 (IQR: 2-7) (P = 0.016) at 12-months post-surgery. At 12 months post-surgery, 18 (67%) of 27 patients with preoperatively disabling headache showed clinically relevant improvement of their headache, 4 (15%) showed deterioration, and 5 (19%) remained unchanged. In patients with clinically relevant improvement of their headache, the EQ-VAS score improved from 50 (IQR: 30 - 7) to 80 (IQR: 65-86) (P < 0.001). Of the 74 patients with no preoperative headache, 11 (15%) developed postoperative headache. We identified no clinical factors predicting postoperative headache relief.

CONCLUSION

The study supports that clinically significant and long-lasting improvements of disabling headache and QoL can be achieved with TSS in a substantial number of patients with NFPA.

Prolactin in headache and migraine: A systematic review of clinical studies

OBJECTIVE

To systemically review clinical studies investigating the role of prolactin and its receptors in headache and migraine.

BACKGROUND

Migraine prevalence is more common in women compared to men. As prolactin is a crucial regulator of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis, prolactin and its receptors might contribute to signaling mechanisms underlying migraine.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we searched PubMed and EMBASE with the terms: prolactin, hyperprolactinemia, macroprolactinemia, hypoprolactinemia, migraine, headache, head pain and trigeminal pain pathway for clinical studies investigating prolactin signaling in headache and migraine. Two reviewers independently screened 841 articles for population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design. Studies were restricted to the English language and were excluded if they had a nonexperimental methodology.

RESULTS

Nineteen clinical studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The main findings were that serum prolactin levels were found to be higher in individuals with migraine compared to healthy controls, and prolactinomas (prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas) were correlated with higher incidence of headache in otherwise healthy individuals and migraine attacks in individuals with migraine.

CONCLUSION

Considerable evidence suggests a key role of prolactin and its receptors in migraine pathophysiology. Further randomized and placebo-controlled clinical studies targeting prolactin signaling are needed to further clarify influences of prolactin in migraine attack initiation.

Headache Before and After Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Study

Objective Headache is a common symptom among patients with pituitary tumors, as it is in the general population. The aim of the study was to investigate headache as a symptom in patients with pituitary tumors before and 6 months after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS).

Design This is a prospective observational cohort study.

Setting This study was conducted at university tertiary referral hospital.

Participants A total of 110 adult patients underwent endoscopic TSS for pituitary tumors.

Main Outcome Measures The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire was used before and 6 months after surgery for the assessment of headache. Clinical variables with potential influence on headache were analyzed.

Results Sixty-eight (62%) patients experienced headaches at least once during the 3 months before surgery. Thirty (27%) patients reported disabling headache before surgery, with younger age being an independent associated factor (p < 0.001). In patients with disabling headache before surgery, the median (interquartile range) MIDAS score improved from 78 (27–168) to 16 (2–145; p = 0.049), headache frequency decreased from 45 (20–81) to 14 (4–35) days (p = 0.009), and headache intensity decreased from 6 (5–8) to 5 (4–7) (p = 0.011) after surgery. In total, 16 of the 30 (53%) patients reported a clinically relevant improvement and five (17%) a clinically relevant worsening. Four (5%) patients developed new disabling headache. No predictor for postoperative improvement of headache was identified.

Conclusion In this prospective study, the results show that disabling headache improves following endoscopic TSS in a subset of patients with pituitary tumors. However, no predictive factors for improvement could be identified.

Symptomatic migraine: A systematic review to establish a clinically important diagnostic entity

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a clinical presentation indistinguishable from migraine can occur due to an underlying condition or pathology, that is, "symptomatic migraine."

BACKGROUND

It is currently not clear whether migraine truly can be caused by an underlying condition or pathology. Characterization of the etiology and clinical features of possible symptomatic migraine is of significant clinical importance and further may help elucidate the pathophysiology of migraine.

METHODS

We devised operational diagnostic criteria for "symptomatic migraine" and "possible symptomatic migraine" requiring strong evidence for a causal relation between underlying cause and migraine symptoms adhering strictly to diagnostic criteria. PubMed was searched for case reports of symptomatic migraine from inception to March 2020. Only articles published in English or German were included. No restrictions were placed on study design. Relevant references in the articles were also included. Papers were systematically reviewed by two independent reviewers for detailed clinical features of migraine as well as the proposed underlying conditions and the effects of treatment of these conditions.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 1726 items. After screening, 109 papers comprising 504 cases were reviewed in detail. Eleven patients with migraine with aura (MWA) fulfilled our working criteria for symptomatic migraine, and 39 patients fulfilled our criteria for possible symptomatic migraine. The most common etiologies of symptomatic migraine were arteriovenous malformations, carotid stenosis, dissection or aneurysm, brain infarctions, meningioma, and various intra-axial tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic MWA, indistinguishable from idiopathic MWA, may occur due to cortical lesions or microembolization. We found no clear evidence supporting the existence of symptomatic migraine without aura although we did identify possible cases. Our findings are limited by the available literature, and we suggest that prospective studies are needed.

Characteristics of pain in patients with pituitary adenomas: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

This study determines the prevalence and particularities of headache and pain with neuropathic characteristics (NC) in a large French group of patients with pituitary adenoma (PA).

METHODS

Analysis of validated self-administered questionnaires, radiological characteristics and treatment strategies of PA was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 221 sent questionnaires, 146 could be used for statistical analysis, 50% of which were completed by women. Among responders, 58.9% had pain: 30.1% migraine, 15.7% pain with NC and 13.1% other types of pain. Migraine was more common in patients with PA than in the general population (30.1% vs. 21.3%, p = .010) and attacks received appropriate treatment for less than 20% of these patients. Furthermore, the prevalence of chronic migraine was much higher than in the general population (6.8% vs. 2.2%, p = .003). Neuropathic pain was also more frequent in PA patients than in the general population (15.8% vs. 6.9%, p < .001). Neuropathic pain was most often located in the extremities and was frequently described as an 'electric shock', 'numbness', or 'pins-and-needles'. Multivariate analyses linked migraine to younger age, anxiety, pain with NC, and a visible tumour on MRI, regardless of its invasiveness or secretory nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine headaches and neuropathic pain are more frequent and disabling in PA patients than in the general population. Both types of pain are comorbid in PA patients and are poorly treated. Migraine is associated with the presence of a tumour. Thus, biological mechanisms of this relationship need to be characterized to design optimal treatments for these individuals.

SIGNIFICANCE

Migraine headaches and neuropathic pain are more common in PA patients than in the general population and are generally poorly treated. A systematic screening for migraine should be done by physicians in daily practice to provide adequate therapeutics.

Update on headache and brain tumors

Headache is one of the leading symptoms often associated with brain tumours. Secondary headaches attributed to intracranial neoplasias have been included in subchapter 7.4 of the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). According to ICHD-3, the headache may be attributed to a brain tumour if it has developed in close temporal relation with the development of the neoplasia, has significantly worsened in parallel with the worsening of the tumour, and/or has significantly improved following the successful treatment of the neoplasia. Brain tumour headache was traditionally thought to display some specific clinical characteristics, including worsening in the morning and/or when lying down, being aggravated by Valsalva-like manoeuvres and accompanied by nausea and/or vomiting; however, the studies performed after the advent of modern neurodiagnostic techniques have pointed out that the "classic" brain tumour headache is uncommon, particularly at the time of clinical presentation. Therefore, it becomes critical to seek some specific factors associated with the presence of an intracranial mass (the so-called "red flags") that can guide the physician to establish an accurate diagnosis.

Impact of transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas on overall health-related quality of life: a longitudinal cohort study

Background: Previous studies show a moderate improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas, but no consistent predictors of HRQoL outcome have been identified. We aimed to evaluate overall HRQoL changes following such surgery, and assess potential patient or tumour characteristics that predict HRQoL outcome.Materials and methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas were prospectively enrolled. They completed the EQ-5D 3L, a generic HRQoL questionnaire, preoperatively, and at one (n = 57) and six months (n = 56) postoperatively. HRQoL was assessed as both postoperative change in median EQ-5D 3L score, and as change greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in EQ-5D 3L score. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess potential predictors of clinically significant HRQoL changes (>MCID) at six months postoperatively.Results: There was a slight, but statistically significant, improvement in median EQ-5D 3L scores at six months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. Sixteen patients (29%) reported a clinically significant improvement in HRQoL at six months postoperatively, and larger preoperative tumour volume was a statistically significant predictor of such improvement. Eight patients (14%) reported a clinically significant deterioration in HRQoL at six months, but none of the assessed variables predicted such deterioration.Conclusions: Patient-reported overall HRQoL improved slightly after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas at group level. Patients with larger tumours might have more HRQoL benefits from surgery, but the mechanisms behind the predictive nature of tumour volume remain unknown.

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas: indications for pituitary surgery and post-surgical management

PURPOSE

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are associated with impaired well-being, increased comorbidities, and reduced long-term survival. Data on optimal management of NFPAs around surgical treatment are scarce, and postoperative treatment and follow-up strategies have not been evaluated in prospective trials. Here, we review the preoperative, perioperative, and early postoperative management of patients with NFPAs.

METHODS

We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English with the following items "Pituitary neoplasms AND Surgery" and "Surgery AND Hypopituitarism". Studies containing detailed analyses of the management of NFPAs in adult patients, including pituitary surgery, endocrine care, imaging, ophthalmologic assessment and long-term outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

Treatment options for NFPAs include active surveillance, surgical resection, and radiotherapy. Pituitary surgery is currently recommended as first-line treatment in patients with visual impairment due to adenomas compressing the optic nerves or chiasma. Radiotherapy is reserved for large tumor remnants or tumor recurrence following one or more surgical attempts. There is no consensus of optimal pre-, peri-, and postoperative management such as timing, frequency, and duration of endocrine, radiologic, and ophthalmologic assessments as well as management of smaller tumor remnants or tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, there is a great variation in the treatment and follow-up of patients with NFPAs. We have, based on available data, suggested an optimal management strategy for patients with NFPAs in relation to pituitary surgery. Prospective trials oriented at drawing up strategies for the management of NFPAs are needed.

A prospective study of headache and neuropeptides in patients with pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical criteria for headache associated with pituitary adenoma (HaPA) in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) 3rd edition version criteria and further determine whether elevations of plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 1-38 (PACAP1-38) concentration contribute to HaPA.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical features of consecutive patients with pituitary adenoma were recorded. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 concentrations in pituitary adenoma patients within 72 h pre- and post-operation were measured. Primary outcome for HaPA patients were 50% reduction of moderate-to-severe headache days at 3 months after discharge.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients with pituitary adenoma were recruited, 33 (52.4%) of whom had headache. The patients who had HaPA presented with migraine-like (32.9%), tension-type-like (12.1%), and stabbing headache (9.1%). Non-functional adenoma was present in the majority of cases (82.5%). Surgical resection improved headache in 83.3% of cases at 3 month follow-up. Pre- and post-operative calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 levels were significantly higher in patients with headache than in those without headache (p < 0.05). Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 levels at 72 h post-operation were lower at 72 h after operation in patients who had greater improvement in headache compared with those who had little improvement, while plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 levels were similar between these two groups preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most pituitary adenoma patients have non-functional adenoma, and half of this group have HaPA, indicating that the ICHD-3 criteria for HaPA with the emphasis on secretion status need further modifications. Lower plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 concentrations at 72 h after operation may predict a better outcome in patients with HaPA.

Clinical Presentation and Management of Headache in Pituitary Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of headache in the setting of pituitary adenoma. The purpose of this article is to educate providers on the association, possible pathophysiology, and the clinical presentation of headache in pituitary tumor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent prospective evaluations indicate that risk factors for development of headache in the setting of pituitary adenoma include highly proliferative tumors, cavernous sinus invasion, and personal or family history of headache. Migraine-like headaches are the predominant presentation. Unilateral headaches are often ipsilateral to the side of cavernous sinus invasion. In summary, this paper describes how the size and type of pituitary tumors play an important role in causation of headaches. Pituitary adenoma-associated headache can also mimic primary headache disorders making recognition of a secondary process difficult. Therefore, this paper highlights the association of between trigeminal autonomic cephalgias and pituitary adenomas and urges practitioners to maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating patients with these uncommon headache presentations. However, on balance, given the prevalence of both primary headache disorders and pituitary adenomas, determining causality can be challenging. A thoughtful and multidisciplinary approach is often the best management strategy, and treatment may require the expertise of multiple specialties including neurology, neurosurgery, and endocrinology.

Preoperative Stratification of Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery Patients Based on Surgical Urgency

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no prioritization scale available to distinguish those patients with pituitary tumors who require urgent surgical intervention from those who are candidates for elective treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a classification system that can help primary care physicians, endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, ancillary support staff, and hospital administrators identify high-priority surgical candidates.

METHODS

An expert international panel of clinicians consisting of endocrinologists and neurosurgeons who are involved in the diagnosis and management of sellar disease was convened. The panel retrospectively reviewed individual experiences, including a cohort of patients operated upon for pituitary related disease at the Brigham and Women's Hospital from January 2008 to November 2015. A risk stratification schema was developed to streamline patient care pathways.

RESULTS

We identified 4 groups of surgical candidates with varying levels of risk, and then assigned treatment timelines and different differential diagnoses to each. The 4 groups were as follows: group A: urgent-immediate; group B: prompt-initiate treatment within 1 to 2 weeks; group C: soon-initiate treatment within 3 months; group D: elective-as soon as indicated. Among 472 patients treated at Brigham and Women's Hospital for pituitary adenomas, each was assigned to 1 of the 4 predetermined subgroups: group A, 6.8%; group B, 30.1%; group C, 31.1%; group D, 32.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a risk stratification schema that may serve as a platform to streamline care to the patients at highest risk. The expert opinions presented provide a basis for future studies regarding the risk prioritization of patients.

Presence of headache and headache types in patients with tumors of the sellar region-can surgery solve the problem? Results of a prospective single center study

PURPOSE

Headache is a common presenting feature of patients with pituitary adenomas and other tumors of the sellar region. However, at present, it still is unclear whether the headache is actually caused by the tumor. To explore whether there is a relation, we examined in detail the headache types, their relationship to the underlying pathology, and if the headache responded to neurosurgery in a prospective study design.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with tumors of the sellar region scheduled for neurosurgery in a single center were analyzed for presence and quality of headache before surgery and at least 3 months after surgery. Patients received headache and depression self-rating inventories, presented on a handheld computer (PainDetect^®). Clinical variables thought to impact on headache were analyzed in conjunction with the inventories.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (53%) patients reported headache in the 3 months prior to neurosurgery, 49 (44%) had headache at the time of filling in the questionnaires. The four patients with pituitary apoplexy described thunderclap headache. In the other patients diverse headache types were encountered, most frequently migraine. Untreated gonadotroph deficiency was significantly associated with absence of headache, while none of the other clinical and morphological variables related to headache. Presence of headache and disability due to headache were not significantly reduced after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Apart from pituitary apoplexy we detected no specific headache type in our patient group and no significant improvement of headache after neurosurgery. Headache alone constitutes neither a valid diagnostic marker for the presence of tumors of the sellar region nor a sufficient indication for tumor removal.

Headache in Patients With Pituitary Lesions: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Headache is a presenting feature in 37% to 70% of patients with pituitary tumor. Other pituitary lesions may also present with headache, and together these lesions account for about 20% of all primary brain lesions. Although pituitary lesions have been associated with headache, the exact nature of the relationship remains undefined. It is not always clear whether the presenting headache is an unrelated primary headache, a lesion-induced aggravation of a preexisting primary headache, or a separate secondary headache related to the lesion.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize headache in patients referred to a multidisciplinary neuroendocrine clinic with suspected pituitary lesions and to assess changes in headache in those who underwent surgery.

METHODS

We used a self-administered survey of headache characteristics completed by patients upon presentation and after any pituitary surgical procedure.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three participants completed the preoperative questionnaire (response rate of 99%). The overall prevalence of headache was 63%. Compared to patients without headache, the group with headache was more likely to be female (P = .001), younger (P = .001), and to have had a prior headache diagnosis (P < .001). Seventy-two percent of patients reported headache localized to the anterior region of the head. Fifty-one patients with headache underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Headache was not associated with increased odds of having surgery (odds ratio, 0.90). At 3 months, 81% of surgically treated patients with headache who completed the postoperative questionnaire (21/26) reported improvement or resolution of headaches. No patient who completed the postoperative questionnaire (44/84) reported new or worsened headache.

CONCLUSION

Frequent, disabling headaches are common in patients with pituitary lesions referred for neuroendocrine consultation, especially in younger females with a preexisting headache disorder. Surgery in this group was associated with headache improvement or resolution in the majority and was not found to cause or worsen headaches. Suggestions for revision of the International Classification of Headache Disorders diagnostic criteria pertaining to pituitary disorders are supported by these findings.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for headache associated with non-functioning pituitary adenomas

Background Headaches associated with pituitary adenoma have been reported to be related to the structural characteristics and endocrine factors of the tumour itself. Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of, and the risk factors for, non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA)-associated headaches in Chinese patients with normal endocrine activity. Methods Ninety-seven patients with a NFPA with normal endocrine laboratory results were prospectively enrolled in this study. The relevant clinical demographic data were collected and examined with the appropriate statistical methods. Results The pre-operative prevalence of tumour-associated headaches was 48.5%; 87.2% of these patients had migraine-like headaches. A family history of primary headache (odds ratio (OR) 3.67; p = 0.032) and a higher tumour Knosp grade (OR 1.83; p = 0.001) were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of NFPA-associated headaches. The patient's age, sex, visual disturbances, optic chiasm compression, tumour size and tumour volume were not significantly associated with NFPA-associated headaches ( p > 0.05). In addition, headache severity was significantly correlated with the Knosp grade ( r = 0.339; p = 0.001). The sides of the headaches and of cavernous sinus invasion were significantly concordant (48.9% agreement; κ = 0.257; p = 0.007). Conclusions Migraine-like headaches are a common clinical manifestation in patients with NFPAs. A family history of primary headaches and cavernous sinus invasion are risk factors for NFPA-associated headaches.

Pituitary Adenoma and Non-acute Headache: Is There an Association, and Does Treatment Help?

OBJECTIVE

Headache is a controversial indication for treatment of pituitary adenoma. We studied the possible relationship between pituitary adenomas and headache as well as the symptomatic effects of treatment.

METHODS

Current and prior headache complaints were assessed in structured telephone interviews in 201 patients with pituitary adenoma. Clinical variables and headache history were retrieved from medical records. Headache prevalence among patients was compared with a regional population-based cohort.

RESULTS

The presence of headache was higher in patients before the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma compared with the general population (P < 0.001). At follow-up, overall prevalence was lower (P < 0.001), but chronic headache was more prevalent (P = 0.001) than in the general population. With the exception of family history, no associations between headache and clinical or radiologic variables were identified. At follow-up evaluation, 77% of patients with headache reported improvement, 5% reported worsening, and 11% reported new headaches. Patients with nonfunctional adenoma who underwent surgical treatment reported improvement more often (85%) than patients who did not undergo surgery (58%) (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort with both treated and untreated patients with pituitary adenoma, headache prevalence was low compared with the general population. We found no link between clinical or radiologic variables and headache. Although a higher proportion of patients who underwent surgical treatment reported symptomatic relief, most patients who did not undergo treatment also improved. We believe that the unpredictable dynamics of headache over time and the lack of predictive and modifiable tumor-related variables associated with headache or treatment of headache weaken headache as a sole indication for pituitary adenoma treatment.

Tobacco, Nicotine, and Headache

BACKGROUND

Migraineurs variably attribute the cause of their headache to tobacco exposure, whereas tobacco is often stated to cause headache-related disability worldwide. Given tobacco's physiological and emotional addictiveness and migraine's substantial economic impact, improved functionality can be difficult for those with migraine exposed to tobacco products. Environmental tobacco exposure in indoor spaces and workplaces is associated with exacerbation of headache. Avoidance of headache triggers is included in most comprehensive migraine treatment programs, yet tobacco awareness, avoidance, or coping is rarely emphasized as part of that regimen.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to examine the various types of tobacco products to which headache sufferers are exposed and the known basic mechanisms by which tobacco (nicotine) exposure promotes headache pain, and to review the extensive literature on tobacco related to headache with a detailed descriptive narrative providing the basis for conclusions regarding association of noncluster headache-related tobacco exposure. Tobacco-related recommendations are offered.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched without yearly restriction through the date of submission (May 2015), using the MeSH terms "tobacco," "tobacco products," "smoking," "tobacco use," "headache," and "headache disorders." The selection of articles was not limited to English studies or to humans. Articles were excluded when "headache" and "tobacco" were not both mentioned with data provided. Case series were included. Bibliographies of all articles were screened for additional relevant articles.

RESULTS

Although migraineurs worldwide report tobacco smoke among triggers, it is rarely among the highest in frequency, and biases abound with predominantly noncontrolled retrospective data. Prospective population-based diary data are extremely limited, and no controlled trials exist to confirm a cause and effect for headache of any type. Although some studies are nonsupportive and even conflicting, headache, pain, and tobacco exposure currently remain associated.

CONCLUSION

Conflicting data support the validity of patient-reported environmental tobacco exposure as a headache trigger. Prospective controlled studies are needed, but unlikely to be performed, to determine the extent that tobacco influences the headache process, in addition to other under-recognized factors. Meanwhile, because of numerous other negative health effects, decreased tobacco exposure should be recommended to headache patients of all ages in hopes of decreasing disability and improving functionality.

It IS a tumor -- current review of headache and brain tumor

"Do I have a tumor?" This is a question in every person's mind when first confronted with a new-onset headache, a question that causes considerable anxiety among patients, leading them to seek medical evaluation. This publication reviews the current literature with respect to the epidemiology, pathophysiology presentation, and treatment of headaches in association with intracranial neoplasm.

Prolactinoma-associated headache and dopamine agonist treatment

AIM

The aim of this article is to investigate the phenotype and etiology of prolactinoma-associated headache as well as present and discuss the plausible pain-relieving effect of dopamine agonist treatment.

METHODS

In this case-based audit we included 11 patients with prolactinomas and one patient with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia presenting with headache that subsequently improved or resolved after dopamine agonist treatment.

RESULTS

A significant ipsilateral location of tumor mass and reported headache symptoms was observed (p = 0.018). After dopamine agonist treatment seven out of 12 patients became pain free within 2.5 months; after one year of treatment 11 out of 12 reported headache improvement or resolution. Average tumor volume reduction after treatment was 47 ± 22% during 9.5 ± 8.4 months of follow-up. There was no significant association between headache relief and tumor shrinkage (p = 0.43) or normalization of serum prolactin (p = 1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

1) The significant association between lateralization of tumor and headache suggests a mechanical origin of the headache, 2) headache responded to dopamine agonist treatment in most patients, and 3) our observations encourage future prospective controlled trials to investigate the role of hyperprolactinemia in the pathogenesis of headache as well as the therapeutic effects of dopamine agonists.

Headache and pituitary disease: a systematic review

Headache is very common in pituitary disease and is reported to be present in more than a third of all patients with pituitary adenomas. Tumour size, cavernous sinus invasion, traction or displacement of intracranial pain-sensitive structures such as blood vessels, cranial nerves and dura mater, and hormonal hypersecretion are implicated causes. The present review attempts to systematically review the literature for any combination of headache and pituitary or hormone overproduction or deficiency. Most data available are retrospective and/or not based on the International Headache Society (IHS) classification. Whereas in pituitary apoplexy a mechanical component explains the almost universal association of the condition with headaches, this correlation is less clear in other forms of pituitary disease and a positive impact of surgery on headaches is not guaranteed. Similarly, invasion into the cavernous sinus or local inflammatory changes have been linked to headaches without convincing evidence. Some studies suggest that oversecretion of GH and prolactin may be important for the development of headaches, and treatment, particularly with somatostatin analogues, has been shown to improve symptoms in these patients. Otherwise, treatment rests on general treatment options for headaches based on an accurate clinical history and a precise classification which includes assessment of the patient's psychosocial risk factors.