Latest Trends in Hemodiafiltration

This review provides a detailed analysis of hemodiafiltration (HDF), its progress from an emerging technique to a potential conventional treatment for chronic hemodialysis patients, and its current status. The article covers the advances, methods, and clinical benefits of HDF, specifically focusing on its impact on cardiovascular health, survival rates, and overall well-being. The review also addresses questions about the safety of HDF and provides evidence to dispel concerns related to the elimination of beneficial substances and infection risks. Additionally, the article explores the potential implications of expanded hemodialysis (HDx) as an alternative to HDF, its classification, safety profile, and an ongoing trial assessing its non-inferiority to HDF. Supported by evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies, the review emphasizes the superiority of HDF as a hemodialysis modality and advocates for its positioning as the gold standard in treatment. However, it acknowledges the need for extensive research to define the role of HDx in comprehensive treatment approaches in individuals undergoing dialysis. The synthesis of current knowledge underscores the importance of ongoing exploration and research to refine hemodialysis practices for optimal patient outcomes.

Comparison of measured vs kinetic-model predicted phosphate removal during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND

To what extent hemodiafiltration (HDF) improves management of hyperphosphatemia over hemodialysis (HD) is a subject of ongoing investigation.

METHODS

We modified a previously described phosphate kinetic model to include incorporation of EUDIAL recommended equations for hemodiafiltration (HDF) clearance. We used the model to predict the recovery of phosphate from spent dialysate/hemofiltrate and compared this with averaged data from five published studies. Mean study average predialysis serum phosphate was 1.81 ± 0.20 mmol/L. Session length was close to 240 min per treatment. All HDF was done postdilution, at an average rate of 65 ± 24 mL/min.

RESULTS

Measured mean phosphate removal was 1039 ± 136 mg (33.5 ± 4.41 mmol, slightly lower than the model-predicted mean value of 1092 ± 127 mg (35.3 ± 4.09 mmol). The measured ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.15 ± 0.22, ranging from 1.01 to 1.44. Using mean study input parameters for patient size and treatment characteristics, the predicted ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.095 ± 0.029, ranging from 1.05 to 1.13.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of EUDIAL-recommended convective clearance equations to a phosphate kinetic model predicts a 10% or greater benefit in terms of phosphate removal for HDF compared with HD at typical dialysis and hemodiafiltration treatment settings. These predictions are similar to the HDF advantage reported in the literature in studies where phosphate removal has been measured in spent dialysate.

Dialysis and Extracorporeal Therapies for Enhanced Elimination of Toxic Ingestions and Poisoning

Poisoning and toxic ingestions cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Extracorporeal therapies such as dialysis, haemoperfusion and plasma exchange are selectively applied to patients with severe intoxications unresponsive to standard interventions and can be lifesaving. Extracorporeal therapies are a complex but fundamental aspect of the practice of nephrology. Without high-quality evidence to guide implementation, an understanding of toxicokinetics and the physiochemical principles of the enhanced elimination techniques is especially important. This review provides a comphrensive, user-friendly outline of the application of extracorporeal therapy in the poisoned patient.

Mixed versus predilution hemodiafiltration effects on convection volume and small and middle molecule clearance in hemodialysis patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

The use of newly developed mixed-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) can supplement the weaknesses of pre- and postdilution HDF. However, it is unclear whether mixed-HDF performs well compared to predilution HDF.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, open-labeled, randomized controlled trial from two hemodialysis centers in Korea. Between January 2017 and September 2019, 60 patients who underwent chronic hemodialysis were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either predilution HDF (n = 30) or mixed-HDF (n = 30) for 6 months. We compared convection volume, changes in small- and medium-sized molecule clearance, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level, and dialysis-related parameters between the two dialysis modalities.

Results

A mean effective convection volume of 41.0 ± 10.3 L/session in the predilution HDF group and 51.5 ± 9.0 L/session in the mixed-HDF group was obtained by averaging values of three time-points. The difference in effective convection volume between the groups was 10.5 ± 1.3 L/session. This met the preset noninferiority criteria, suggesting that mixed-HDF was noninferior to predilution HDF. Moreover, the β2-microglobulin reduction rate was greater in the mixed-HDF group than in the predilution HDF group, while mixed-HDF provided greater transmembrane pressure. There were no significant between-group differences in Kt/V urea levels, changes in predialysis hs-CRP levels, proportions of overhydration, or blood pressure values. Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension episodes and other adverse events occurred similarly in the two groups.

Conclusion

Use of mixed-HDF was comparable to predilution HDF in terms of delivered convection volume and clinical parameters. Moreover, mixed-HDF provided better β2-microglobulin clearance than predilution HDF.

Renal Replacement Modality Affects Uremic Toxins and Oxidative Stress

Nowadays, the high prevalence of kidney diseases and their related complications, including endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, represents one of the leading causes of death in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Renal failure leads to accumulation of uremic toxins, which are the main cause of oxidative stress development. The renal replacement therapy appears to be the best way to lower uremic toxin levels in patients with end-stage renal disease and reduce oxidative stress. At this moment, despite the increasing number of recognized toxins and their mechanisms of action, it is impossible to determine which of them are the most important and which cause the greatest complications. There are many different types of renal replacement therapy, but the best treatment has not been identified yet. Patients treated with diffusion methods have satisfactory clearance of small molecules, but the clearance of medium molecules appears to be insufficient, but treatment with convection methods cleans medium molecules better than small molecules. Hence, there is an urgent need of new more validated, appropriate, and reliable information not only on toxins and their role in metabolic disorders, including oxidative stress, but also on the best artificial renal replacement therapy to reduce complications and prolong the life of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Optimized convective transport with automated pressure control in on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration

Purpose

In a stable patient population we evaluated on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) on the incremental improvement in blood purification versus high-flux HD, using the same dialyzer and blood flow rate. For HDF we used a new way of controlling HDF treatments based on the concept of constant pressure control where the trans-membrane pressure is automatically set by the machine using a feedback loop on the achieved filtration (HDF UC).

Methods

We enrolled 20 patients on on-line HDF treatment and during a 4-week study period recorded key treatment parameters in HDF UC. For one mid-week study treatment performed in HD and one midweek HDF UC treatment we sampled blood and spent dialysate to evaluate the removal of small- and middle-sized solutes.

Results

We achieved 18±3 liters of ultrafiltration in four-hour HDF UC treatments, corresponding to 27±3% of the treated blood volume. That percentage varied by patient hematocrit level. The ultrafiltration amounted to 49±4% of the estimated plasma water volume treated. We noted few machine alarms. For β2m and factor D the effective reduction in plasma level by HDF (76±6% and 43±9%, respectively) was significantly greater than in HD, and a similar relation was seen in mass recovered in spent dialysate. Small solute removal was similar in HDF and HD. Albumin loss was low.

Conclusion

The additional convective transport provided by on-line HDF significantly improved the removal of middle molecules when all other treatment settings were equal. Using the automated pressure control mode in HDF, the convective volume depended on the blood volume processed and the patient hematocrit level.

Consequences of increasing convection onto patient care and protein removal in hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Recent randomised controlled trials suggest that on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) improves survival, provided that it reaches high convective volumes. However, there is scant information on the feasibility and the consequences of modifying convection volumes in clinics.

METHODS

Twelve stable dialysis patients were treated with high-flux 1.8 m2 polysulphone dialyzers and 4 levels of convection flows (QUF) based on GKD-UF monitoring of the system, for 1 week each. The consequences on dialysis delivery (transmembrane pressure (TMP), number of alarms, % of achieved prescribed convection) and efficacy (mass removal of low and high molecular weight compounds) were analysed.

RESULTS

TMP increased exponentially with QUF (p<0.001 for N >56,000 monitoring values). Beyond 21 L/session, this resulted into frequent TMP alarms requiring nursing staff interventions (mean ± SEM: 10.3 ± 2.2 alarms per session, p<0.001 compared to lower convection volumes). Optimal convection volumes as assessed by GKD-UF-max were 20.6 ± 0.4 L/session, whilst 4 supplementary litres were obtained in the maximum situation (24.5 ± 0.6 L/session) but the proportion of sessions achieving the prescribed convection volume decreased from 94% to only 33% (p<0.001). Convection increased high molecular weight compound removal and shifted the membrane cut-off towards the higher molecular weight range.

CONCLUSIONS

Reaching high convection volumes as recommended by the recent RCTs (> 20L) is feasible by setting an HDF system at its optimal conditions based upon the GKD-UF monitoring. Prescribing higher convection volumes resulted in instability of the system, provoked alarms, was bothersome for the nursing staff and the patients, rarely achieved the prescribed convection volumes and increased removal of high molecular weight compounds, notably albumin.

Hemodialysis for the treatment of pulmonary hemorrhage from dabigatran overdose

Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor indicated for thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Since its approval in the United States in 2010, dabigatran-associated hemorrhages have garnered much attention because bleeding rates were higher than initially expected. Additionally, reversing anticoagulation remains challenging. Traditional modes of reversing warfarin-associated coagulopathies are ineffective in reversing anticoagulation from dabigatran. Although hemodialysis is proposed as a method to accelerate dabigatran elimination, evidence supporting its clinical utility remains unproved. We report the case of an 80-year-old man who presented with worsening hemoptysis in the setting of unintentional ingestion of excess dabigatran. Despite transfusion of 2 units of fresh frozen plasma, he continued to bleed, although his international normalized ratio improved from 8.8 to 7.2. He underwent hemodialysis, and serum dabigatran concentration decreased from 1,100 to 18 ng/mL over 4 hours, with an initial extraction ratio of 0.97 and blood clearance of 291 mL/min. Although his serum dabigatran concentration rebounded to 100 ng/mL 20 minutes after the cessation of dialysis, his bleeding stopped and he improved clinically. Hemorrhage in the setting of dabigatran anticoagulation remains a therapeutic predicament. Hemodialysis may play an adjunct role in accelerating the elimination of dabigatran in bleeding patients.

Comparison of the effects of predilution and postdilution hemodiafiltration on neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets

Numerous studies have been carried out to investigate the solute removal efficiency of hemodiafiltration (HDF). However, the effect of the dilution mode on blood cell damage during HDF has not yet been examined in detail. Here, we compared predilution and postdilution HDF with respect to their effects on blood cells. Five patients were allocated to one session each of predilution HDF and postdilution HDF. Concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), and the phagocytotic and sterilizing functions of neutrophils before and after the HDF sessions were evaluated. Lymphocyte blastoid transformation induced by mitogens was also evaluated by measurement of the [(3)H]-thymidine uptake. The IL-6 and ICAM-1 concentrations decreased after predilution HDF, and increased after postdilution HDF. Lymphocyte blastoid transformation was more pronounced after predilution HDF than after postdilution HDF. There was no significant difference in PDMP between the dilution modes. We conclude that predilution HDF could be more favorable for dialysis patients than postdilution HDF from the point of view of the effects on the blood cells, especially neutrophils and lymphocytes.

Dialysate saving by automated control of flow rates: comparison between individualized online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis

Cost reduction and quality improvement seem to be conflicting issues. However, online hemodiafiltration (oHDF) with new automatic functions offers a cost-efficient therapy compared to hemodialysis (HD). Seven dialysis centers conducted a randomized clinical trial with cross-over design: high-flux HD vs. postdilutional oHDF with functions coupling both dialysate and substitution flow rates to blood flow rates. During the 6 weeks of the study, all treatment parameters remained unchanged for HD and oHDF, apart from dialysate and substitution flow rate. Treatment data were recorded during each treatment, and predialytic and postdialytic concentrations of urea were recorded at the end of each study phase. The analysis involved 956 treatments of 54 patients. The mean dialysate consumption was 123.2 ± 6.4 l for HD and 113.4 ± 14.9 l for oHDF (p < 0.0001), the mean dialysis dose was 1.42 ± 0.23 for HD and 1.47 ± 0.26 for oHDF (p < 0.0001); oHDF resulted in a lower dialysate consumption (8.0% less) and a slightly increased dialysis dose (Kt/V 3.5% higher) compared to HD. oHDF with the investigated automatic functions offers substantial savings in dialysate consumption without decreasing dialysis dose.

Changing emphasis in modern hemodialysis therapies: cost-effectiveness of delivering higher doses of dialysis

This paper describes the clinical experience of a therapy concept involving advanced functions of a new dialysis machine system (5008 Therapy System, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg Germany) that is able to provide adequate Kt/V for patients, while consuming lower amounts of dialysate, water and energy during the treatment. The novel 'AutoFlow' function of this therapy system adjusts automatically the dialysate flow rate according to the effective blood flow rate of the individual patient without compromising the dose of dialysis the patient receives. The new therapy system of Fresenius Medical Care enables a more widespread application of advanced convective treatment modalities in a more affordable manner.

Quantitative analysis of convective dose in hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration: "Predilution" vs. "postdilution" reinfusion

In hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF), removal of medium and high-molecular-weight solutes is greatly enhanced by convective mechanisms as compared with simple diffusion; increasing convective flows may allow greater removal rates of these solutes. Use of "predilution" (pre-H[D]F) may allow higher ultrafiltration rates than the "postdilution" mode (post-H[D]F); yet, the dilution of plasma water may have unpredictable effects on "endogenous" water convection. We have applied a mathematical analysis to evaluate and compare endogenous water convective flow rates in pre-H(D)F vs. post-H(D)F. Endogenous plasma water recovered in ultrafiltrate was calculated according to patient (hematocrit, total protein level) and session parameters (blood flow, ultrafiltration rate, programmed weight loss), in absolute terms and as a fraction of endogenous plasma water delivery to the filter. Maximally efficient post-H(D)F was modelled according to a preset postfilter hematocrit or filtration fraction. Nomograms were constructed expressing endogenous water convective fluxes in relation to parameters of interest (ultrafiltration rate, blood flow, hematocrit) with both post-H(D)F and pre-H(D)F, and "efficiency" of pre-H(D)F vs. post-H(D)F (as the ratio of endogenous water convective flow rate with the 2 techniques) as a function of the ultrafiltration/reinfusion rate. In post-H(D)F, the model predicts maximal ultrafiltration rates within the limits of a preset hemoconcentration at the filter outlet; additionally, the model allows to calculate ultrafiltration/reinfusion quantities to be set in pre-H(D)F to equal and overcome maximal convective efficiency of post-H(D)F. This "equivalence" ultrafiltration rate may greatly vary according to patient's hematocrit and blood flow, so that the ultrafiltrate-reinfusate volume available in the system dictates, in any patient, which mode of reinfusion may attain higher "endogenous" convective flow rates. Pre-H(D)F may allow higher fractional and absolute "endogenous" convective flow rates as compared with post-H(D)F, provided that adequate amounts of reinfusate are available. For lower reinfusate volumes than "equivalence" values, post-H(D)F remains a better option.

Extracorporeal strategies for the removal of middle molecules

Uremic toxins with a molecular weight of less than 500 Da are classified as small nitrogenous waste products. They are highly water soluble, relatively homogeneous, and have no protein binding. Other uremic retention toxins differ significantly from the small nitrogenous metabolite class in molecular weight, heterogeneity, protein binding, and hydrophobicity. The European Uremic Toxin Work Group subdivided molecules into two categories: protein-bound solutes and middle molecules. Middle molecules were defined as toxins in the molecular weight range of 500-60,000 Da, which exceeds the molecular weight of 2000 Da defined in the original middle molecule hypothesis. Under this new proposed definition, most of these middle molecules are low molecular weight peptides and proteins (LMWPs). This concise review focuses on LMWPs. The metabolism of LMWPs is described, including molecular weight, physical conformation, and charge. Factors influencing dialytic removal of LMWPs such as membrane characteristics, protein-membrane interactions, and solute removal mechanisms, as well as strategies to enhance clearance of these compounds are discussed.

Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss

The aim of the present study was transmembrane pressure (TMP) modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration (HDF) to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. The optimal flow/pressure conditions in on-line mixed HDF assisted with a feedback control of TMP were defined in this prospective randomized study in order to obtain maximal efficiency in solute removal while minimizing potential side effects. Two different TMP profiles in mixed HDF were compared in 12 unselected patients who underwent two study periods of 2 weeks each in cross-over randomized sequence: (A) constant TMP at around 300 mmHg and (B) profiled TMP, in which TMP was slowly increased from a low initial value to the maximal value. In both procedures, the mean volume exchange was 10.6+/-1.4 l/h. Mean filtration fraction was 53%. Instantaneous beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) clearance was higher at the start of the session with profiled TMP (207+/-35 vs 194+/-28 ml/min, P<0.005), whereas no differences were found at the end (135+/-19 vs 132+/-19 ml/min). Profiled TMP resulted in a higher mean beta2-m clearance of the session (97.0+/-15.4 vs 87.8+/-18.3 ml/min, P<0.01), in lower albumin loss in the first 30 min (0.62+/-0.14 vs 0.98+/-0.18 g, P<0.0001), and, in the whole session (3.98+/-1.19 vs 5.24+/-0.77 g, P<0.001), in higher dialyzer ultrafiltration coefficients and lower resistance indexes. This study showed that the TMP feedback modulation in mixed HDF was highly effective in maintaining very high ultrafiltration rates and filtration fractions, and minimized potential side effects as a result of the improved preservation of membrane permeability and more favorable dialyzer pressure regimen.

Convective and adsorptive removal of beta2-microglobulin during predilutional and postdilutional hemofiltration

BACKGROUND

Beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2-m) removal in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is maximal with convective techniques, such as hemofiltration (HF) or hemodiafiltration (HDF). Although the infusion mode of the replacement solution (predilution or postdilution) is expected to influence the efficiency of HF, experimental data in this respect are scanty. We therefore investigated the impact of the fluid reinfusion mode on the efficiency of HF in 11 ESRD patients who underwent both treatments.

METHODS

The dialyzer (AK 200 ULTRA) was equipped with a 3-layer polyamide membrane (Poliflux 21 S, surface 2.1 m(2)) and blood flow was kept between 300 and 400 mL/min. beta2-m concentrations were measured in plasma water and ultrafiltrate at appropriate times during a 240-minute treatment. The following dialytic parameters were calculated: total amount of beta2-m removed (A(tot)), beta2-m removed by convection (A(con)) and by adsorption (A(ads)), percent reduction in beta2-m plasma water concentration (% Cpw(in)), total plasma water clearance (CLpw(tot)), convective plasma water clearance (CLpw(con)), adsorptive plasma water clearance (CLpw(ads)), and sieving coefficient (SC).

RESULTS

CLpw(tot), CLpw(ads), and% Cpw(in) were similar in pre- and postdilutional conditions, whereas CLpw(con) and SC were higher and CLpw(ads) was lower in postdilution than in predilution HF. Since a significant inverse correlation was found between A(ads) and SC, predilution probably determines greater protein fouling than postdilution.

CONCLUSION

The 2 techniques appear to be equivalent in terms of total beta2-m removal, although this final result is obtained by different contributions of convective and adsorptive elimination.

On-line haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis: stable haematocrit with less erythropoietin and improvement of other relevant blood parameters

BACKGROUND

Controlled randomised studies to prove improved cardiovascular stability and improved anaemia management during on-line haemodiafiltration (oHDF) are scarce.

METHODS

70 patients were treated with both haemodialysis (HD) and oHDF in a cross-over design during 2 x 24 weeks at a dialysis dose of eKt/V> or =1.2. Patients randomised into group A started on HD and switched over to oHDF, whereas patients in group B began with oHDF and were treated with HD afterwards. Intradialytic morbid events (IME), such as symptomatic hypotension or muscle cramps, were noted in case of appearance. Blood parameters reflecting anaemic status, phosphate status, lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and accumulation of advanced glycation end products were recorded either monthly or at the end of each study phase.

RESULTS

The mean incidence of IME was 0.15 IME per treatment, and there was no statistical difference between oHDF and HD. A higher haematocrit (oHDF 31.5% vs. HD 30.5%, p < 0.01) at a lower erythropoietin dose (oHDF 4,913 vs. HD 5,492 IU/week, p = 0.02) was found during oHDF, when the sequence of HD and oHDF had not been taken into account. For the study groups, the results were less distinct: in group A, a higher haematocrit (HD 30.4% vs. oHDF 32.0%, p < 0.01) at a comparable erythropoietin dose (HD 5,421 vs. oHDF 5,187 IU/week, ns) was observed during oHDF, whereas in group B an identical haematocrit (oHDF 30.8% vs. HD 30.7%, ns) was achieved at a reduced erythropoietin dose (oHDF 4,622 vs. HD 5,568 IU/week, p < 0.01). During oHDF, lower levels of free and protein-bound pentosidine and of serum phosphate were found.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to other studies, no benefit regarding cardiovascular stability for oHDF was found, but oHDF could well offer a potential benefit regarding anaemia correction, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid profiles, and calcium-phosphate product.

Uremic toxins: a new focus on an old subject

The uremic syndrome is characterized by an accumulation of uremic toxins due to inadequate kidney function. The European Uremic Toxin (EUTox) Work Group has listed 90 compounds considered to be uremic toxins. Sixty-eight have a molecular weight less than 500 Da, 12 exceed 12,000 Da, and 10 have a molecular weight between 500 and 12,000 Da. Twenty-five solutes (28%) are protein bound. The kinetics of urea removal is not representative of other molecules such as protein-bound solutes or the middle molecules, making Kt/V misleading. Clearances of urea, even in well-dialyzed patients, amount to only one-sixth of physiological clearance. In contrast to native kidney function, the removal of uremic toxins in dialysis is achieved by a one-step membrane-based process and is intermittent. The resulting sawtooth plasma concentrations of uremic toxins contrast with the continuous function of native kidneys, which provides constant solute clearances and mass removal rates. Our increasing knowledge of uremic toxins will help guide future treatment strategies to remove them.

Selection of Dilutional Method for On-Line HDF, Pre- or Post-Dilution

Post- and pre-dilution methods equally have advantages and disadvantages, therefore we should choose the more favorable one for clinical use. However, it still remains controversial which technique is better in on-line HDF. In post-dilution, the clearances of small molecular uremic toxins increase as well as low molecular proteins, however the risk of albumin leakage caused by high transmembranous pressure (TMP) also increases. We can avoid the risk of albumin leakage because there are several maneuvers which aid in avoiding an increase of TMP, such as glucose infusion and gradual control of Q(f). On the other hand, the pre-dilution method is rather safe in the risk of albumin leakage but has an obvious clearance loss of small molecular substances caused by a decreased dialysate flow rate. The influence of microbial contamination and acetate are rather severe in pre-dilution on-line HDF. These lines of evidence suggest that post-dilution on-line HDF is the best choice for treating chronic HD patients.

Mid-dilution on-line haemodiafiltration in a standard dialyser configuration

BACKGROUND

Mid-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) results in an improved middle molecule removal compared with standard HDF. The OLpur MD 190 haemodiafilter represents a new dialyser design exclusively for mid-dilution on-line HDF. Compared with standard haemodialysers, structural changes in the headers allow the infusion of high replacement fluid volumes after a first post-dilution and before a second pre-dilution stage.

METHODS

We compared in vitro the new device [blood flow (QB) 400 ml/min, substitution flow (QS) 100 and 200 ml/min, dialysate flow (QD) 800 ml/min] with a conventional high-flux dialyser of the same surface area in haemodialysis (HD) (QD 500 ml/min) and post-dilution HDF (at QS 60, QD = 500 ml/min and at QS 100, QD = 800 ml/min) modes. Subsequently, we performed an initial clinical application of the new device in six mid-dilution HDF treatments of five end-stage renal disease patients (QB 400 ml/min, QS 200 ml/min, QD 800 ml/min, treatment duration 205+/-23 min).

RESULTS

In vitro urea and beta2-microglobulin clearances in mid-dilution HDF were, respectively, 309.2+/-5.5 and 144.4+/-15.2 ml/min (QS 100) and 321.6+/-4.1 and 204.9+/-4.1 ml/min (QS 200), compared with 278.6+/- 17.2 and 94.0+/-7.6 ml/min in HD, and 310.8+/-10.2 and 123.0+/-6.5 ml/min (QS 60) and 323.6+/-11.2 and 158.0+/-10.3 ml/min (QS 100) in post-dilution HDF. The in vivo trials showed the clinical utility of the device and confirmed the in vitro data: urea and beta2-microglobulin clearances were, respectively, 324.6+/- 10.9 and 207.9+/-29.3 ml/min, while reduction ratios were 75.0+/-5.5 and 83.6+/-4.7%.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results need confirmation in a prospective cross-over study. However, the Nephros MD 190 haemodiafilter promises to be a true technological step ahead in terms of improved beta2-microglobulin removal.

On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middle-molecule removal

BACKGROUND

Increased middle-molecular uremic toxin removal seems to favorably influence survival in dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to verify if, in on-line mixed hemodiafiltration, solute removal by convection may be enhanced by forcing the ultrafiltration rate (QUF) and optimizing the infusion technique in order to achieve the highest possible filtration fraction (FF).

METHODS

Removal of beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m), urea, creatinine, and phosphate were compared in 20 patients randomly submitted to one dialysis session (A), one postdilution hemodiafiltration session (B), and three sessions of mixed hemodiafiltration (C, D, and E) at different infusion rates (QS). In mixed hemodiafiltration, a newly developed feedback system automatically maintained the transmembrane pressure (TMP) within its highest range of safety (250 to 300 mm Hg) at constant QUF, while ensuring the maximum FF by splitting infusion between pre- and postdilution.

RESULTS

A mean QS of 134 +/- 20 mL/min (mean FF = 0.65) was attained in post-HDF, and up to 307 +/- 41 mL/min (mean FF = 0.69) in mixed hemodiafiltration. The mean dialysate clearances (KDQ) for all tested solutes and urea eKt/V were significantly higher in all hemodiafiltration sessions than in dialysis. Only in the case of urea did the infusion mode have no significant effect. KDQ for beta2-m was maximal in session D and significantly higher than in session B (90.2 +/- 11 mL/min vs. 77.5 +/- 11 mL/min; P = 0.02). KDQ for beta2-m significantly correlated with QS and the plasma water flow rate (QPW). The highest KDQ for beta2-m was found at values of QS approximately QPW. Beyond this value KDQ decreased.

CONCLUSION

The mixed infusion mode in hemodiafiltration, controlled by the TMP-ultrafiltration feedback, seems to improve the efficiency of hemodiafiltration by fully exploiting the convective mechanism of solute removal. The feedback automatically adjusted the infusion rate and site to the maximum FF taking into account flow conditions, internal pressures, and hydraulic permeability of the dialyzer and their complex interactions.

Middle molecules and small-molecular-weight proteins in ESRD: properties and strategies for their removal

Molecular weight has traditionally been the parameter most commonly used to classify uremic toxins, with a value of approximately 500 Da frequently used as a demarcation point below which the molecular weights of small nitrogenous waste products fall. This toxin group, the most extensively studied from a clinical perspective, is characterized by a high degree of water solubility and the absence of protein binding. However, uremia is mediated by the retention of a plethora of other compounds having characteristics that differ significantly from those of the previously mentioned group. As opposed to the relative homogeneity of the nitrogenous metabolite class, other uremic toxins collectively are a very heterogeneous group, not only with respect to molecular weight but also other characteristics, such as protein binding and hydrophobicity. A recently proposed classification scheme by the European Uraemic Toxin Work Group subdivides the remainder of molecules into 2 categories: protein-bound solutes and middle molecules. For the latter group, the Work Group proposes a molecular weight range (500-60,000 Da) that incorporates many toxins identified since the original middle molecule hypothesis, for which the upper molecular weight limit was approximately 2,000 Da. In fact, low-molecular-weight peptides and proteins (LMWPs) comprise nearly the entire middle molecule category in the new scheme. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the middle molecule class of uremic toxins, with the focus on LMWPs. A brief review of LMWP metabolism under conditions of normal (and in a few cases, abnormal) renal function will be presented. The physical characteristics of several LMWPs will also be presented, including molecular weight, conformation, and charge. Specific LMWPs to be covered will include beta 2-microglobulin, complement proteins (C3a and Factor D), leptin, and proinflammatory cytokines. The article will also include a discussion of the treatment-related factors influencing dialytic removal of middle molecules. Once these factors, which include membrane characteristics, protein-membrane interactions, and solute removal mechanisms, are discussed, an overview of the different therapeutic strategies used to enhance clearance of these compounds is provided.

Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Removal of medium and large solutes is poor with low-flux (LF-HD) and limited with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). In clinical practice, there are few in vivo solute markers. Osteocalcin is a protein with a molecular mass of 5,800 daltons, and myoglobin is a large molecule with a molecular mass of 17,200 daltons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of OL-HDF on in vivo removal of a wide spectrum of solutes (urea, creatinine, osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin) in comparison to LF-HD and HF-HD.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (15 men, 8 women) were studied. Every patient underwent three dialysis sessions with routine HD parameters. We compared 1.8-m2 polysulfone LF-HD and 1.8-m2 polysulfone HF-HD versus OL-HDF. Predialysis and postdialysis solute concentrations were measured. The percentage of reduction ratio for each solute was calculated.

RESULTS

Mean values for predialysis osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin were 16.3 +/- 21 ng/mL, 27.4 +/- 5 mg/L, and 239 +/- 162 ng/mL in LF-HD, respectively. Urea and creatinine reduction ratios were similar in LF-HD and HF-HD and only 1.2% higher in OL-HDF. Osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin reduction ratios for LF-HD were negligible. Mean osteocalcin reduction rates were 54.2% +/- 12% for HF-HD versus 63.5% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (reinfusion volume, 26.8 +/- 5 L/session; P < 0.01). Mean beta2-microglobulin reduction rates were 60.1% +/- 9% for HF-HD versus 75.4% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (P < 0.01). Mean myoglobin reduction rates were 24.5% +/- 6% and 62.7% +/- 9% for HF-HD and OL-HDF, respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LF-HD does not seem to remove solutes with a molecular weight greater than 5,800 daltons. OL-HDF provides marked enhancement of convection volume and enables a significant increase in osteocalcin and beta2-microglobulin removal. Myoglobin extraction is nil with LF-HD, very low with HF-HD, and only adequate with OL-HDF.

On-line hemodiafiltration in critical care

On-line products of substitution fluid permits virtually unlimited fluid volume exchange during continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) to critical care. In on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF), endotoxin free dialysate obtained using pyrogen cut filters is infused into the blood circuit, and HDF is automatically performed using the closed-loop balancing system of the dialysis machine. On-line CHDF is the application of this on-line HDF to continuous renal replacement therapy in the critical care field. We performed on-line CHDF on 376 acute renal failure patients during a 5 year period, and the mean survival rate was 62.5%. We concluded that the on-line CHDF system is safe and effective at maintaining acute renal failure patients.

Dialysis membranes today

In recent years, hemodialytic therapies have evolved from the simple, diffusion-dependent removal of small molecular weight substances from blood to advanced therapy modalities involving the convective removal of larger uremic sloutes. The clinical benefits of removal of substances such as beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) have been reported by several authors: elimination of large-molecular weight "uremic toxins" is now widely accepted as being beneficial to the overall quality of life of patients. This trend would not have been possible without parallel technical developments, especially that of new membranes having more open pore structures resulting in higher sieving coefficients and increased hydraulic permeability. Not all polymer types are suitable for the manufacture of high-flux membranes required for convective therapies in which large fluid volumes are exchanged. Amongst the more important criteria are: the selected polymer must be able to undergo steam sterilisation, have high endotoxin retention capabilities, be versatile for the fabrication of a range of hydraulic permeabilities and, of course, have high blood compatibility. The aim of this paper is, firstly, to review the major membrane development phases over the last quarter of a century. Secondly, the suitability of current membrane materials to meet the aforementioned requirements will be examined. Thirdly, in view of the recent, rapid proliferation of polysulfone-based membranes, dialysis membranes of the polysulfone 'family' are placed under scrutiny; membranes of this class represent a significant portion of the product portfolio of dialyser manufacturers today, yet, few end-users are able to distinguish between the salient features of the respective products because of a combination of confusing membrane nomenclature, classification, tradenames and product claims.

Effects of the infusion mode on bicarbonate balance in on-line hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND

Electrolyte and acid-base balance may be differently affected by the infusion mode in on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF). We studied the effects of the different infusion modes on bicarbonate transport across the dialyzer membrane, and thus on the final bicarbonate balance of the HDF sessions.

METHODS

Instantaneous HCO3- transfer across the dialyzer membrane, blood bicarbonate profile and the total balance of the sessions were studied in six dialysis patients under the same operating conditions over 36 HDF sessions, in order to compare the effects of predilution HDF (pre-HDF), postdilution HDF (post-HDF), and mixed HDF on the final bicarbonate balance.

RESULTS

The final HCO3- balance was more positive in post-HDF vs pre-HDF (142 +/- 36 vs 99 +/- 41 mmol/session, p<0.05), with a final blood HCO3- concentration of 26.6 +/- 1.0 vs 25.4 +/- 1.1 mmol/L, (p<0.05). Mixed HDF yielded intermediate results (balance: 119 +/- 42 mmol/session, final HCO3- 26.2 (1.2 mmol/L). These differences were seen to result from the increased HCO3- concentration of blood entering the filter in predilution, due to the infused HCO3-, enhancing convective loss and reducing the driving force for diffusive HCO3- gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Bicarbonate concentration in dialysate-reinfusate is critical in order to obtain an adequate end of session HCO3- balance in on-line HDF. The predilution method produced the lowest cumulative net HCO3- gain between the three studied infusion modes. Our data suggest that, under the same operating conditions and excluding the effect of ultrafiltration, dialysate HCO3- should be increased by about 2 mmol/L in pre-HDF, and 1 mmol/L in mixed HDF, to yield the same final balance as in post-HDF.

Online hemodiafiltration versus acetate-free biofiltration: a prospective crossover study

Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) are 2 innovative renal replacement therapies. Convincing evidence has shown that both techniques are superior to conventional hemodialysis in many aspects. The aim of the present investigation was to compare online HDF and AFB in 12 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients in a prospective, randomized crossover trial. Twelve stable dialysis patients, age 49.7 +/- 11.3 years and on dialysis for 83.5 +/- 76.7 months, were treated prospectively and randomly by either AFB, predilution HDF (pre-HDF), or postdilution HDF (post-HDF) for a total of 36 weeks using exclusively F60S high-flux dialyzers. Routine blood biochemical tests, bone metabolism parameters, and clearance for both small and larger molecular weight substances were measured at defined intervals. During the trial period inter- and intradialysis symptoms, e.g., hypotensive episodes and intradialysis arterial blood gas analyses, were recorded. Both online HDF and AFB were well accepted by the overwhelming majority of patients and also by the dialysis staff. Pretreatment sodium, total and ionized calcium, chloride, bicarbonate, and urea did not differ within or between the 3 treatment groups. Potassium increased slightly in HDF patients while phosphate and beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) decreased in all groups. After dialysis, AFB patients exhibited a significantly higher bicarbonate concentration and lower potassium level when identical potassium concentrations in dialysate were used. Patients receiving AFB manifested less intradialysis partial pressure of oxygen drop and partial pressure of carbon dioxide rise than those on HDF treatments. HDF treatments could afford higher single-pool and double-pool Kt/V, higher effective urea and beta2M clearance, and lower total interdialysis symptom scores than the AFB treatment method. While bone metabolism parameters did not differ between the 3 dialysis modalities, some parameters such as deoxypyridinoline in HDF and osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline in AFB deteriorated at the end of the crossover study. Aluminum concentration decreased progressively to about one-third of prestudy values at the end of the study with all 3 treatments. AFB was associated with a lower predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP), a smaller drop in MAP during treatment, and similar hypotension episodes compared with the 2 HDF treatments. Albumin concentration showed a trend to decrease during the first 2 months of the trial period followed by a slight increase thereafter but still significantly lower than initial value at the end of crossover. Both online HDF and AFB share most of the features of optimal renal replacement therapy. Online HDF is superior to AFB in such aspects as increased delivered dialysis dose both for small and larger molecular weight toxins and less interdialysis symptoms. On the other hand, AFB is associated with a smaller effect on arterial blood gas values and improved intradialysis hemodynamic tolerance. Some dialysis-related symptoms and complications in the case of our AFB practice could be attributable, at least in part, to low dialysate calcium level.

Low-Molecular Weight Proteins in End-Stage Renal Disease: Potential Toxicity and Dialytic Removal Mechanisms

ABSTRACT. Low-molecular-weight proteins (LMWP) are now recognized as a distinct class of uremic toxins, and numerous compounds in this category have been identified. Dr. Henderson has spent much of his career investigating ways to enhance the removal of intermediate- and large-sized uremic retention molecules. As LMWP clearly fall under this category, it is fitting to provide a review of several aspects of this molecular class. Normal renal metabolism of LMWP is discussed along with the changes that occur during chronic renal insufficiency. The effect of end-stage renal disease on plasma LMWP concentrations is assessed. As examples of the potential uremic toxicity of this molecular class, leptin, adrenomedullin, and the compounds associated with increased susceptibility to infection are highlighted. Finally, an overview of LMWP removal mechanisms for both hemodialysis and the convective therapies is provided.

Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes

BACKGROUND

On postdilution hemodiafiltration (post-HDF), convective removal of medium-high molecular weight solutes is, at the highest ultrafiltration rates, limited by high blood viscosity and protein concentration. Prefilter reinfusion (pre-HDF) may overcome this problem, but plasma dilution may affect the overall efficiency of the technique. In this study, an experimental system of online HDF with combined prefilter and postfilter infusion (mixed HDF) was evaluated and compared with the traditional predilution and postdilution modes.

METHODS

Removal of urea (U), creatinine (Cr), phosphate (Phos), and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)m), ultrafiltration coefficients of the dialyzer (K(UF)), and rheologic conditions of the blood circuit were evaluated during the three infusion modes (a total of 36 runs lasting 180 min), performed with a polysulfone hemofilter 1.8 m(2), blood flow (Q(b)) 400 mL/min, dialysate flow (Q(d)) 700 mL/min, and infusion rate 120 mL/min (pre-HDF and post-HDF), or 60 + 60 mL/min (mixed HDF).

RESULTS

The mean effective U and Cr clearances and urea index of dialysis dose (eKt/V) were significantly higher on post-HDF than on pre-HDF (K(WB) (U) 210 vs. 193 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 152 vs. 142 mL/min, eKt/V 1.41 vs. 1.30), while mixed HDF did not show significant differences versus post-HDF (K(WB) (U) 201 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 149 mL/min). K(DQ) for Phos and beta(2)m were higher on post-HDF in only absolute values. Similar differences were found for instantaneous dialyzer clearances (K(I)) at 60, 120, and 180 minutes of the sessions, with a common trend to decrease with time. K(UF) and the apparent beta(2)m sieving coefficient showed their lowest values toward the end of post-HDF sessions. Increasing filtration fractions (FFs) were associated with increasing transmembrane pressure (TMP) and solute clearances up to FF values of 0.45. These were values achieved in only post-HDF, at which point the curve of the relationship between TMP and FF assumed its steepest exponential trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed HDF, by better preserving the characteristics of water and solute transport of the membrane, ensured safer operating conditions than post-HDF, while achieving similar removal of small- and large-size solutes. Optimizing the ratio of prefilter/postfilter infusion and the total infusion according to the relationships found in our study between solute clearances, FF, and TMP, convective flux and transport may avoid excessive hemoconcentration and dangerous pressure gradients.

On-line hemodiafiltration: technique and therapy

On-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) provides the largest amount of blood purification over a wide molecular weight spectrum achievable with present renal replacement therapies. When used with state of the art dialysis membranes and treatment systems, the biocompatibility of on-line HDF is as high as can presently be defined. From an economic perspective, the added cost of the ultrafilters used to prepare the substitution solution is balanced by the therapeutic benefits of HDF. For optimal HDF, the ultrafiltration rate must be maximized with respect to the blood flow rate. In on-line HDF systems, the excess volume ultrafiltered, approximately 20 to 30 liters per treatment, is automatically replaced, preferably in postdilution mode, by a substitution solution that is continuously generated by stepwise ultrafiltration of dialysate. When properly prepared, this fluid fulfills the quality demands of commercially available infusion solutions; that is, it can be referred to as sterile and pyrogen-free. The most important factors in preparing substitution solution are the quality of the water, of the concentrates, of the ultrafilters, and the microbiological status of the entire flow path. The clinical safety of substitution solution prepared on-line has been documented by long-term users of on-line systems. Results from clinical studies with on-line HDF confirm the overall increased clearance of solutes in relation to high-flux dialysis using the same membrane.

Principles and practice of hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration

There is growing interest in the convective dialysis therapies, hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). Both require dialysis membranes which are highly permeable to solutes as well as fluid, and in both cases large volumes of ultrafiltration are the condition for convective transport. In HDF the convection is combined with diffusion, and as a consequence, maximum clearance over the entire molecular weight spectrum is achieved. Optimal forms of HDF provide urea clearance 10-15% higher than the corresponding diffusive mode. The larger the solute, the greater is the impact of convection, and beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) levels may be up to 70% reduced. Traditional postdilution HF provides high clearance of medium sized and large molecules. Satisfactory clearance of small solutes requires blood flows in excess of 500 ml/min. With access to practically unlimited volumes of substitution solution through on-line ultrafiltration, predilution HF can now be used. This increases the clearance of small solutes to an acceptable range. For HDF as well as HF, large patient populations consistently treated for longer periods of time are needed to make valid outcome comparisons with other therapies.