Preoperative assessment of salivary gland neoplasms with fine needle aspiration cytology and echography: a retrospective analysis of 357 cases

Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology in diagnosis and surgery of parotid gland lesions

INTRODUCTION

A cytology report is always a challenge for both head and neck surgeons and cytopathologists to diagnose and manage parotid gland (PG) diseases, because of the various similar features between the lesions.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was conducted to assess our practice using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) in different categories.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients with parotid gland lesions were diagnosed by clinical examination, ultrasound, and FNAC under ultrasound guidance at our hospital from 1 May 2019 to 30 April 2021. The FNAC results were divided into six categories according to the Milan system. We calculated the ROM for each category of the Milan system based on histopathological follow-up.

RESULTS

This study included 204 patients. There were 115 men (56 %) aged 46-60 years. Pathology results were 33 cases for malignant and 182 cases for benign. The rate of malignancy for each category according to the MSRSGC were 23.1 % (non-neoplastic), 20 % (atypical), 50 % (neoplastic), 1 % (benign), 10.3 % (salivary neoplasm of uncertain neoplastic potential), 84.6 % (suspicious for malignancy), and 100 % (malignant) categories. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of FNAC with application of Milan system were respectively 90.9 %, 98.2 %, 90.9 %, 98.9 % and 97 %.

CONCLUSION

When the Milan system was applied, FNAC had a high efficacy, suggesting that MSRSGC can improve the communication between the cytopathologist and the surgeon. This system can allow the surgeon to decide the extent of the surgery.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Parotid Tumors

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is widely used in clinical practice as a simple and minimally invasive test for parotid tumors that allows for preoperative estimation of benignancy and malignancy, histological type, and malignancy grade and can be performed on an outpatient basis. In recent years, cell blocks prepared with core needle biopsy (CNB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) have increased the reliability of immunostaining and molecular biological testing, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. In 2018, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology was introduced, but it does not include malignancy grade or histological type, so we proposed the Osaka Medical College classification as a more clinically based cell classification that includes both types of information, and we have reported on its usefulness. This review gives an overview of the history and use of FNA and describes CNB and LBC and the two classification systems.

The effectiveness of the Milan system for risk stratification of salivary gland lesions: The 10-year cytohistopathological correlation results of salivary gland FNA cytology at a tertiary center

BACKGROUND

The Milan system reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a tiered classification scheme that is based on risk stratification. The aim of the current study was to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) and risk of neoplasia (RON) in each of the diagnostic categories proposed by the MSRSGC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis and categorization according to the MSRSGC was made of salivary gland fine needle aspirations (FNA) performed from January 2007 to December 2017. The FNA cytology results were correlated with subsequent histological follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 578 FNAs were evaluated and histopathology was available for 198 cases (34.2%). The RON and ROM for individual diagnostic categories were: Non-diagnostic: 52.2% to 13%, non-neoplastic: 21.4% to 10.7%, atypia of undetermined significance: 74% to 22.2%, benign neoplasm: 100% to 1.1%, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential: 93.3% to 53.3%, suspicious for malignancy (SFM): 100% to 100%, and malignant: 100% to 100%. A diagnosis of 'SFM' or 'malignant' with FNA cytology carried a 100% risk for malignancy, while a diagnosis of "non-neoplastic," "benign neoplasm" reduced the probability of malignancy to 3.4%.

CONCLUSION

The MSRSGC is useful for the management of salivary gland lesions as it can successfully differentiate between benign and malignant cases. It will bring uniformity in salivary gland FNA cytology reporting across various institutions globally.

Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Two-Year Experience of the Implementation of the Milan for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology at a Private Medical Laboratory

This study aimed to present the 2-year experience of the implementation of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology at Alpha Prolipsis Medical Laboratories, a private medical laboratory located in Athens, Greece. A totaI of 102 Fine Needle Aspirations (FNAs) performed since 2018 were included in the study. Reports were issued according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. Aspirates were prepared with both conventional and liquid-based cytological methods and were evaluated by two or three Board-certified cytopathologists. Diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy were evaluated. All cases included in this study had histologic follow-up. The diagnostic accuracy of FNA for differentiating between benign and malignant disease according to MSRSGC classification was 93.3%, the specificity was 97.5% and the sensitivity was 82.2%. The positive and negative predictive values were 93.2 and 87.2%, respectively. Our results show that FNA is a valuable examination technique in the preoperative evaluation of salivary gland lesions. The integration of the 2018 Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology is effective, with an overall accuracy around 95%.

Moving toward a systematic approach for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: cytohistological correlation with the application of the Milan system for risk stratification at a tertiary care center

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of salivary glands is a well-established technique that plays a critical role in the preoperative diagnosis of lesions. Despite its clinical utility, it remains one of the most challenging areas in cytopathology. This is because there is no consensus on how to report salivary gland cytopathology, which has resulted in inconsistent terminology and confusion in communication among cytopathologists and clinicians. A risk stratification of FNA diagnostic categories has been recently proposed to be useful in reporting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of FNAC of salivary gland lesions reported from 2014 to 2017 was performed. The performance of the cytology reporting system was evaluated with histological diagnosis serving as the gold standard. The aspirates were then categorized according to the Milan system. Furthermore, the risk of malignancy was calculated for all diagnostic categories.

RESULTS

A total of 899 salivary gland aspirates were evaluated: 2.2% were nondiagnostic, 55.8% indicated nonneoplastic lesions, and 40.4% indicated neoplastic lesions. Histopathology was available for 172 cases. FNA had a sensitivity of 72.3% and a specificity of 92.6% with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.4% for differentiating malignant from benign tumors.

CONCLUSION

A tiered classification scheme as proposed by the Milan system may prove helpful in effectively guiding clinical management of patients with salivary gland lesions. Our experience with this system helps to pave the way for the adoption of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.

Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: An Experience with the Implication for Risk of Malignancy

Introduction:

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a well-established technique for evaluation of salivary gland lesions, but because of the heterogenicity and morphological overlap between spectrum of lesion, there are a few challenges in its wide use. Recently, “The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology” (MSRSGC) was introduced, providing guide for diagnosis and management according to the risk of malignancy (ROM) in different categories. The current study was conducted retrospectively to reclassify the salivary gland lesions from previous diagnosis and to evaluate the ROM in different categories.

Material and Methods:

Clinical data, FNAC specimen, histological, and clinical follow-up of cases were retrieved, cytological features were re-evaluated, and cases were reclassified as follows: Category 1: Non-diagnostic (ND); Category 2: Non-neoplastic (NN); Category 3: Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS); Category 4a: Neoplasm: benign (NB), Category 4b: Neoplasm: salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP); Category 5: suspicious of malignancy (SM); and Category 6: Malignant (M).

Result:

Total 293 cases were evaluated cytologically, and histological follow-up was available in 172 cases. The distribution of cases into different categories was as follows ND (6.1%), NN (38.2%), AUS (2.7%), NB (33.4%), SUMP (2.0%), SM (2.4%), and M (15%). Overall, ROM reported were 25%, 5%, 20%, 4.4%, 33.3%, 85.7%, and 97.5%, respectively for each category. Overall, sensitivity was 83.33%, specificity was 98.31%, positive predictive value was 95.74%, and negative predictive value was 92.80%.

Conclusion:

MSRSGC is a recently proposed six category scheme, which places salivary gland FNAC into well-defined categories that limit the possibilities of false negative and false positive cases.

Three-year cytohistological correlation of salivary gland FNA cytology at a tertiary center with the application of the Milan system for risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of salivary glands is a well-established technique that plays a critical role in the preoperative diagnosis of lesions. A risk stratification of FNA diagnostic categories has been recently proposed to be useful in reporting. The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland FNA and to apply the proposed Milan system for reporting salivary gland lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of FNA specimens of salivary gland lesions reported from 2014 to 2016 was performed. A correlation with the follow-up histopathology, wherever it was available, was performed. The aspirates were then categorized according to the Milan system as follows: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypical, benign neoplasm, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (NUMP), suspicious for malignancy, or positive for malignancy. Furthermore, the risk of malignancy and the risk of high-grade malignancy were calculated for all diagnostic categories.

RESULTS

A total of 631 salivary gland aspirates were evaluated: 2.2% were nondiagnostic, 55.8% indicated nonneoplastic lesions, and 40.4% indicated neoplastic lesions. Histopathology was available for 94 cases (14.9%). FNA had a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 98.3% with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.4% for differentiating malignant tumors from benign tumors. The overall risk of malignancy was 17.4% for the nonneoplastic category, 100% for the atypical category, 7.3% for the benign neoplasm category, 50% for the NUMP category, and 96% for the positive-for-malignancy category.

CONCLUSIONS

Salivary gland FNA continues to have high diagnostic accuracy and is thus helpful for guiding management. Neoplasms with classic cytomorphology are easily diagnosed; however, in difficult cases showing overlapping features, the use of the Milan system could be beneficial. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:767-75. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Diagnostic role of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the evaluation of salivary gland swelling: an institutional experience

Background

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a cytodiagnostic method based on morphologic findings of individual and small group of cells aspirated using a fine needle. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the spectrum of salivary gland lesions in our setting and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for salivary gland lesions.

Methods

The study involved 187 cases of parotid and submandibular swellings of patients who underwent FNAC at our institution. Thirty one (31) patients with a FNAC diagnosis of neoplastic lesion subsequently underwent excision biopsies. The results of FNAC and final histology were compared and accuracy of FNAC was determined.

Results

Mean age of patients was 42 (±21) years and male to female ratio was 1:1. Chronic sialadenitis was the most common non-neoplastic lesion (33.8%) followed by acute and chronic sialadenitis (29.7%) and chronic granulomatous inflammation (27.0%). Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common benign neoplasm and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was the most common malignant lesion (38.9%) followed by acinic cell (27.8%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (16.7%). Total 31 patients subsequently underwent surgical excision, out of which 21 were benign and 9 were malignant, 20 cases (64.5%) were of pleomorphic adenoma, 3 cases (9.6%) of acinic cell carcinoma, 2 cases (6.4%) each of warthin tumor, adenoid cystic carcinoma and non-hodgkin lymphoma and 1 case (3.2%) each of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma. The overall accuracy of FNAC in our study was found to be 83.8% with 77.7% sensitivity and 86.3%, specificity. The revised sensitivity and specificity after adjusting verification bias were 68.5% and 91% respectively. False negative diagnosis was rendered in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma whereas false positive diagnosis was given in cases of pleomorphic adenoma.

Conclusion

We found a good concordance between FNAC and histology, however pleomorphic adenoma may impart a diagnostic challenge when inadequately aspirated and therefore we advice either immunohistochemical studies (if cell block material is available) or repeat aspiration in difficult cases.