Induction treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis with leflunomide combined with prednisone: a prospective multi-centre observational study

Disease-Modifying Therapies in Lupus Nephritis: A Narrative Review Evaluating Currently Used Pharmacologic Agents

As more lupus nephritis (LN) medications become available, identifying treatments that are disease-modifying is critical in making treatment decisions. Based on our 2022 published working definition of LN disease modification as 'minimizing disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing progression to end-stage kidney disease' (ESKD), the objective of this review was to classify current LN treatments according to the proposed kidney disease modification criteria, excluding toxicities. Based upon a selection of LN clinical trial (n = 27) and observational study (n = 20) publications, as well as the authors' clinical experiences, we evaluated the disease modification potential for 16 LN treatments (inclusive of antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, calcineurin inhibitors and biologics) according to the proposed kidney disease activity and organ damage criteria at year 1, years 2-5, and > 5-year time points. Fulfilling criteria at year 1 and years 2-5 was considered evidence for disease modification potential. Satisfying criteria at > 5 years (slowing or preventing progression in SLICC/ACR Damage Index [SDI] and ESKD, and/or doubling of serum creatinine) was used to confirm disease modification. Each treatment was designated as one of the following at each time point: (a) criterion met; (b) inconclusive; (c) no available supportive data. This review excluded an assessment of potential toxicities. All LN treatments met at least one of the potential kidney disease-modification criteria at any time point, but limited relevant data in the literature meant disease modification > 5 years could only be confirmed for cyclophosphamide. Belimumab met more criteria across the three time points than any other biologic treatment but lacked > 5-year data to confirm disease modification. Further research is needed to support the classification of LN treatments as disease modifiers, particularly for > 5 years. We discuss considerations for future studies, challenges to the classification, and possible updates to published criteria.

Mizoribine or Cyclophosphamide for Lupus Nephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Lupus nephritis is typically treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide, which is associated with serious adverse effects. Oral mizoribine may be an alternative for induction therapy of lupus nephritis. However, large-scale, long-term, randomized clinical studies of mizoribine are lacking.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of oral mizoribine vs intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for Chinese patients with lupus nephritis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial recruited patients with class III, III+V, IV, IV+V, or V lupus nephritis aged 18 to 70 years from 40 centers in China. Inclusion criteria included 24-hour urinary protein level of 1.0 g or higher and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index of 8 or higher. The first patient was enrolled on November 29, 2014, and the study finished March 14, 2019. The follow-up period was 52 weeks. Data were analyzed from September 4, 2019, to January 21, 2020.

Interventions

Oral mizoribine (50 mg, 3 times a day) or cyclophosphamide (6 intravenous doses at 0.5-1.0 g/m2 body surface area, with a maximum dose of 1.0 g/d) for 52 weeks plus oral glucocorticoid.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Total remission rate (complete remission rate plus partial remission rate) after 52 weeks (prespecified).

Results

A total of 250 patients were randomized, and 243 patients (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [10.7] years, 213 women [87.7%]) were treated (123 patients [50.6%] in the mizoribine group and 120 patients [49.4%] in the cyclophosphamide group). The total remission rate at 52 weeks was 66.1% (76 of 115 patients) in the mizoribine group and 76.8% (86 of 112 patients) in the cyclophosphamide group, and the relative risk ratio (mizoribine vs cyclophosphamide) was 0.861 (95% CI, 0.729-1.016). The lower limit of this 2-sided 95% CI was greater than the noninferiority margin of 0.726, indicating that mizoribine was noninferior to cyclophosphamide. Changes in other immune parameters and kidney function were generally similar between the groups. The incidence of any treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.5% (99 of 123 patients) in the mizoribine group and 78.7% (96 of 122 patients) in the cyclophosphamide group, and the most frequent adverse event in both groups was upper respiratory tract infection (41 patients [33.3%] and 37 patients [30.3%], respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial shows that compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide, oral mizoribine was noninferior and well tolerated when used with glucocorticoid for induction therapy of active lupus nephritis. Mizoribine can be used as an alternative to intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for lupus nephritis.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02256150.

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

RESULTS

All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

An open-label randomized controlled trial of leflunomide in patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant infection

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide for the treatment of acute, symptomatic COVID-19.

Methods

A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial was performed during an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in December 2022. Symptomatic patients within 5 days of COVID-19 onset were randomly allocated to receive 5 days of either symptomatic treatment with leflunomide or symptomatic treatment alone. The primary endpoint was time to sustained clinical recovery.

Results

Fifty-seven participants were randomized into two groups: 27 received leflunomide plus symptomatic treatment and 30 were assigned to symptomatic treatment alone. Participants treated with leflunomide had a shorter fever duration [3.0 interquartile range (IQR, 2.0-4.0) days and 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-6.0) days, respectively (p = 0.027)] and reduced viral shedding [7 (IQR, 6-9.5) days and 9.0 (IQR, 7.5-12.0) days, respectively (p = 0.044)] compared with individuals treated with symptomatic treatment alone. However, there were no significant differences in time to sustained clinical recovery between the two groups [hazard ratio, 1.329 (95% confidence interval, 0.878-2.529); p = 0.207].

Conclusion

In acute adult COVID-19 patients presenting within 5 days of symptom onset, leflunomide combined with symptomatic treatment reduced fever duration and viral shedding time.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/about.html, ChiCTR2100051684.

Predictors of improvement in disease activity in first hospitalized patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter retrospective study of a Chinese cohort

Objectives

To analyze the relative factors of improvement in disease activity (IDA) after first hospitalized treatment based on the systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI).

Methods

A total of 1069 adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who were hospitalized for the first time in 26 hospitals in Jiangsu Province from 1999 to 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. SLEDAI decrease ≥ 4 during hospitalization was identified as IDA. Relative factors of IDA were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

A total of 783 (73.2%) adult SLE patients showed IDA after the first hospitalization, while the remaining patients (n = 286) were in the non-IDA group. The IDA group had higher SLEDAI at admission; fewer patients had SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) ≥ 1, comorbidities at admission, especially Sjögren’s syndrome, abnormal serum creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate. More patients had mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal involvements, leukopenia, increased C-reactive protein, anti-dsDNA antibody positive, and hypocomplementemia at admission and were treated with methotrexate and leflunomide during hospitalization. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, SDI ≥ 1 (P = 0.005) and combined with Sjögren’s syndrome (P < 0.001) at admission had negative association with IDA. Musculoskeletal involvement (P < 0.001), anti-dsDNA antibody positive (P = 0.012), hypocomplementemia (P = 0.001), and use of leflunomide (P = 0.030) were significantly related with IDA.

Conclusion

Organ damage or comorbidities at admission were adverse to SLE improvement. Anti-dsDNA antibody positive, hypocomplementemia, musculoskeletal involvements, and leflunomide treatment had positive association with IDA of SLE.

Key Points • Organ damage or comorbidities at admission were negatively correlated with SLE improvement. • Anti-dsDNA antibody positivity, hypocomplementemia, musculoskeletal involvements, and leflunomide treatment were positively associated with SLE improvement.

A Histology-Guided Approach to the Management of Patients with Lupus Nephritis: Are We There Yet?

Renal involvement is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It occurs in up to two-thirds of patients, often early during the disease course, and is the most important predictor of the morbidity and mortality of SLE patients. Despite tremendous improvements in the approach of the lupus nephritis (LN) therapy, including the recent approval of two new disease-modifying therapies, up to 50% of patients do not obtain a renal response and up to 25% will eventually progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within 10 years of diagnosis. Given the lack of correlation between clinical features and histological lesions, there is an increasing need for a histology-guided approach to the management of patients with LN. Apart from the initial diagnosis of type and severity of renal injury in SLE, the concept of a repeat kidney biopsy (either in a for-cause or a per-protocol scenario) has begun to gain increasing popularity in the nephrology community. Herein, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the most important areas of utility of the kidney biopsy in patients with LN.

New Insights Into Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Therapies: 2010-2020

ABSTRACT

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that may affect every organ. The multiple pathogenic mechanisms and heterogeneous phenotypes of SLE present unique challenges in the management of this complex disease. This article discusses new SLE therapies from the last 10 years. We will address new information in the realms of lifestyle interventions, antimalarials, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, biological therapies, and other modalities as they pertain to SLE.

Leflunomide therapy for IgA vasculitis with nephritis in children

BACKGROUND

Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), also called IgA vasculitis, is a systemic vasculitis characterized by deposits of immunoglobulin A in blood vessels. Renal impairment of these patients is the main determinant of prognosis. The optimal treatment of HSP nephritis (HSPN) in children remains controversial, but many clinicians administer an immunosuppressive agent with a corticosteroid. A previous study reported that leflunomide (LEF) with a corticosteroid was effective for adult patients with HSPN and nephrotic proteinuria. However, data on this treatment in pediatric patients is limited.

METHODS

We described our experience at a single center on the use of LEF in 5 pediatric patients who had IgA vasculitis with proteinuria that was nearly 50 mg/kg (nephrotic range) and remained high despite administration of intravenous steroid, and biopsy-proven nephritis. All patients had class II to IIIb lesions based on the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC).

RESULTS

We successfully treated all 5 children who had IgA vasculitis with nephritis using LEF with a corticosteroid. Four patients achieved a complete remission of proteinuria, and 1 patient had significantly reduced proteinuria. The children received LEF for 6 months to 12 months, and none of them had severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case series to report successful treatment of pediatric HSPN with LEF in combination with a corticosteroid.

Leflunomide plus low-dose prednisone in patients with progressive IgA nephropathy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, and controlled trial

Background

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common cause of glomerulonephritis worldwide, and the optimal approach to its treatment remains a significant challenge.

Methods

We did a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, multicenter, controlled trial, comprised of 3-month run-in, 12-month treatment, and 12-month follow-up phases. After 3-month run-in phase, patients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN at risk of progression were randomly allocated to LEF plus low-dose prednisone (LEF + prednisone group) or conventionally accepted-dose prednisone [prednisone(alone) group] Our primary outcome was 24-h urine protein excretion (UPE) and secondary outcomes were serum albumin (sALB), serum creatinine (Scr), and eGFR. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received the trial medications.

Results

One hundred and eight patients [59 in LEF + prednisone group, 49 in prednisone (alone) group]were enrolled and finished their treatment and follow-up periods. There is no significant difference in the baseline level between the two groups. Compared with baseline, both groups showed a significant decrease in 24-h UPE (p < 0.01) and increase in sALB (p < 0.01), with stable Scr and eGFR throughout the 12-month treatment period. What’s more, these effects were sustained through the 12-month follow-up period. However, there was no difference in 24-h UPE, sALB, Scr, and eGFR between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 12 months, a difference in overall response rate, relapsing rate, and incidence of adverse events between the two groups was not significant.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of LEF plus low-dose prednisone and conventionally accepted-dose prednisone in the treatment of progressive IgAN are comparable.

Efficacy and Safety of Leflunomide for Refractory COVID-19: A Pilot Study

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may persist in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite receiving standard care.

Methods: In this pilot study of hospitalized adult patients (≥18 years of age), with radiologically confirmed pneumonia who were SARS-CoV-2 positive for more than 28 days despite standard care, were assigned to receive standard of care (SOC, grp I) or leflunomide + SOC (grp 2). After 2 weeks, grp 1 and grp 2 patients who continued to be SARS-CoV-2-positive received leflunomide for 14 days while continuing SOC. The primary outcomes were the rate of and time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance and the 14-day and 30-day hospital discharge rate.

Results: 12 patients were enrolled in grp 1 and 15 patients were in grp 2. The 14 days SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance rate was 80.0% (12/15) for grp 2 patients receiving leflunomide vs. 16.7% for grp 1 patients (2/12) (p = 0.002). By day 14, the median time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance was 6.0 days (range 1–12, IQR 1–12) for grp 2 patients. In grp 1, two patients converted to viral negative on days 1 and 6 (p = 0.002). The 14-day discharge rate was 73.3% (11/15) for the grp 2 vs. 8.3% (1/12) for grp 1 (p = 0.001). The 30 days discharge rate was 100% (15/15) for the grp 2 vs. 66.7% (8/12) for grp 1. No severe adverse events or deaths were reported.

Conclusion: Leflunomide may improve the SARS-CoV-2 clearance rate and discharge rate in patients with refractory COVID-19. The tolerability of the 14–28 days course of treatment with leflunomide is acceptable. These preliminary observations need to be verified by a large sample size and randomized controlled trial.

Effectiveness and safety of leflunomide compared with cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in Takayasu's arteritis: an observational study

Aims

The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of leflunomide (LEF) compared with those of cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction against active Takayasu's arteritis (TA) in Chinese patients.

Methods

This was an observational study based on a prospective cohort that included TA patients diagnosed in large third-level first-class general hospitals in East China from January 2009 to September 2018. LEF- or CYC-induced active patients were enrolled for comparative effectiveness analysis. One-to-more paired cohorts of LEF versus CYC were derived by propensity-score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was complete remission (CR) at 9-month follow up, and secondary endpoints included partial remission (PR) and effectiveness rate (ER). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify statistical significance.

Results

A total of 131 enrolled patients with at least 3-months treatment included 53 receiving a regimen of glucocorticoid (GC) and LEF and 78 receiving GC and CYC. Compared with the CYC group, the LEF group showed higher CR rate {LEF versus CYC: 84.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.5-94.8%] versus 59.0% (47.8-70.1%); relative risk (RR) = 0.3 (0.1-0.6), p = 0.002} and lower daily GC dose [10.0 (5.0-12.5) versus 12.5 (10.0-15.0) mg, p = 0.043] at the end of the 9-month induction. In the matched analysis, the LEF group (n = 23) still indicated a higher CR rate than the CYC group (n = 54) after PSM [RR = 0.1 (0.0-0.6), p = 0.003]. Four LEF-treated patients had mild side effects, and one died unrelated to LEF.

Conclusion

LEF could be an alternative induction therapy against TA, showing good effectiveness and tolerance compared with CYC.

The Selective Oral Immunomodulator Vidofludimus in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Safety Results from the COMPONENT Study

INTRODUCTION

The dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitors leflunomide and teriflunomide are immunomodulatory agents approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and multiple sclerosis, respectively, and are actively being investigated as therapeutic agents for other immune-related diseases; however, both structurally related compounds have a number of potentially serious adverse effects. Vidofludimus, a new selective second-generation DHODH inhibitor, is chemically distinct from leflunomide/teriflunomide and appears to exhibit a distinct safety profile.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the COMPONENT study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of vidofludimus in the treatment of patients with active RA on a background therapy of methotrexate. This report focuses solely on the safety results of the COMPONENT trial.

METHODS

Patients received once-daily oral vidofludimus (N = 122) or placebo (N = 119) along with their standard of care methotrexate treatment for 13 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were assessed. Safety parameters were monitored throughout treatment and at follow-up. Plasma concentrations of vidofludimus were measured.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy endpoint, American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR₂₀) responder rate at 13 weeks, demonstrated numerical superiority in the treatment group compared with placebo; however, it did not reach statistical significance. Nonetheless, the COMPONENT study yielded important safety and pharmacokinetic data that could provide important information regarding the use of vidofludimus in other clinical trials, not only for RA but also for other autoimmune diseases. A safety profile for vidofludimus similar to placebo was obtained in this RA patient population. This includes similar rates of the adverse events of diarrhea, alopecia, neutropenia, and elevated liver enzymes, all of which are known drug-related adverse events reported for leflunomide and teriflunomide. A potential pharmacokinetic interaction between vidofludimus and methotrexate was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Vidofludimus demonstrated a positive safety profile, making it a promising candidate for the treatment of a variety of immune-related diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01010581.

Integrated, multicohort analysis reveals unified signature of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease that follows an unpredictable disease course and affects multiple organs and tissues. We performed an integrated, multicohort analysis of 7,471 transcriptomic profiles from 40 independent studies to identify robust gene expression changes associated with SLE. We identified a 93-gene signature (SLE MetaSignature) that is differentially expressed in the blood of patients with SLE compared with healthy volunteers; distinguishes SLE from other autoimmune, inflammatory, and infectious diseases; and persists across diverse tissues and cell types. The SLE MetaSignature correlated significantly with disease activity and other clinical measures of inflammation. We prospectively validated the SLE MetaSignature in an independent cohort of pediatric patients with SLE using a microfluidic quantitative PCR (qPCR) array. We found that 14 of the 93 genes in the SLE MetaSignature were independent of IFN-induced and neutrophil-related transcriptional profiles that have previously been associated with SLE. Pathway analysis revealed dysregulation associated with nucleic acid biosynthesis and immunometabolism in SLE. We further refined a neutropoiesis signature and identified underappreciated transcripts related to immune cells and oxidative stress. In our multicohort, transcriptomic analysis has uncovered underappreciated genes and pathways associated with SLE pathogenesis, with the potential to advance clinical diagnosis, biomarker development, and targeted therapeutics for SLE.

Drug repurposing to improve treatment of rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases

The past century has been characterized by intensive efforts, within both academia and the pharmaceutical industry, to introduce new treatments to individuals with rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases (RAIDs), often by 'borrowing' treatments already employed in one RAID or previously used in an entirely different disease, a concept known as drug repurposing. However, despite sharing some clinical manifestations and immune dysregulation, disease pathogenesis and phenotype vary greatly among RAIDs, and limited understanding of their aetiology has made repurposing drugs for RAIDs challenging. Nevertheless, the past century has been characterized by different 'waves' of repurposing. Early drug repurposing occurred in academia and was based on serendipitous observations or perceived disease similarity, often driven by the availability and popularity of drug classes. Since the 1990s, most biologic therapies have been developed for one or several RAIDs and then tested among the others, with varying levels of success. The past two decades have seen data-driven repurposing characterized by signature-based approaches that rely on molecular biology and genomics. Additionally, many data-driven strategies employ computational modelling and machine learning to integrate multiple sources of data. Together, these repurposing periods have led to advances in the treatment for many RAIDs.

Autoimmune diseases in China

Autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systematic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome, are a group of diseases characterized by the activation of immune cells and excessive production of autoantibodies. Although the pathogenesis of these diseases is still not completely understood, studies have shown that multiple factors including genetics, environment and immune responses play important roles in the development and progression of the diseases. In China, there are great achievements in the mechanisms of autoimmune diseases during the last decades. These studies provide new insight to understand the diseases and also shed light on the development of novel therapy.

Combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) in lupus nephritis: a multicenter, randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVES

The standard strategy for treating lupus nephritis comprises glucocorticoids together with either intravenous cyclophosphamide or oral mycophenolate mofetil, but the low remission rate is still a challenge in practice. This study was aimed to seek higher remission rate of lupus nephritis using a combined strategy.

METHOD

A 24-week trial was conducted in 17 rheumatology or nephrology centers in China. A total of 191 lupus nephritis patients were randomized to follow a combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) with intravenous cyclophosphamide, an oral immunosuppressive agent, namely mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine or leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine (n = 95), or receive intravenous cyclophosphamide alone (n = 96) for 24 weeks. Glucocorticoid was given to both groups. The primary end point was a complete remission with a most stringent standard as proteinuria < 150 mg per 24 h, normal urinary sediment, serum albumin, and renal function at 24 weeks. The secondary end point was treatment failure at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At week 24, both the rate of complete remission (39.5%) and total response (87.2%) was higher in the combined group, compared with CYC group (20.8% and 68.8%, p < 0.05). The cumulative probability of complete remission was also higher in the combined group (p = 0.013). In addition, the combined treatment was superior to routine CYC with less treatment failure (12.8% vs.31.2%, p < 0.001). No difference was found between the incidences of severe adverse events in the two arms: 3.2% (3/95 combined group) vs.4.2% (4/96 CYC group).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a combined immunosuppressive agent is superior to routine CYC only therapy in lupus nephritis.

Current status of lupus nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic disease of unknown aetiology with variable course and prognosis. Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the important disease manifestations of SLE with considerable influence on patient outcomes. Immunosuppression therapy has made it possible to control the disease with improved life expectancy and quality of life. In the last few decades, various studies across the globe have clarified the role, dose and duration of immunosuppression currently in use and also provided evidence for new agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors and rituximab. However, there is still a need to develop new and specific therapy with less adverse effects. In this review, the current evidence of the treatment of LN and its evolution, and new classification criteria for SLE have been discussed. Also, rationale for low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction agent followed by azathioprine as maintenance agent has been provided with emphasis on individualized and holistic approach.

Risk of adverse events from different drugs for SLE: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

The comparative safety of immunosuppressive drugs, biologicals and glucocorticoids (GC) for patients with SLE remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the specific side effects of the available SLE drugs in this population of patients.

Methods

Electronic databases were systematically searched through September 2017 for randomised trials in patients with SLE. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and withdrawal related to adverse events (AEs). We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to obtain estimates for primary and secondary outcomes and presented these estimates as ORs with 95% CIs.

Results

Forty-four studies comprising 9898 participants were included in the network meta-analysis. No drug regimen was considered to be safer for reducing all-cause mortality. However, compared with cyclophosphamide, azathioprine (OR 3.04, 95% CI (1.44 to 6.42)) and cyclosporine (OR 3.28, 95% CI (1.04 to 10.35)) were significantly less safety in AE-related withdrawals, and GC was ranked lowest and led to higher withdrawal rates. Tacrolimus (TAC) was ranked high and showed a benefit in many outcomes. Biologicals and chloroquine also showed good safety in all of the available outcomes, while the beneficial effects of other immunosuppressive drugs were not substantial in different types of serious adverse events.

Conclusions

TAC is the safest strategy for patients with SLE. Biologicals and chloroquine are also fairly safe for patients with SLE. The use of other immunosuppressive drugs and GC needs to be balanced against the potential harms of different types of AEs, and the practical safety of drug combinations still requires further trials to evaluate.

The value of repeat biopsy in lupus nephritis flares

Whether a repeat renal biopsy is helpful during lupus nephritis (LN) flares remains debatable. In order to analyze the clinical utility of repeat renal biopsy in this complex situation, we retrospectively reviewed our series of 54 LN patients who had one or more repeat biopsies performed only on clinical indications. Additionally, we reviewed 686 well-documented similar cases previously reported (PubMed 1990-2015).The analysis of all patients reviewed showed that histological transformations are common during a LN flare, ranging from 40% to 76% of cases. However, the prevalence of transformations and the clinical value of repeat biopsy vary when they are analyzed according to proliferative or nonproliferative lesions.The great majority of patients with class II (78% in our series and 77.5% in the literature review) progressed to a higher grade of nephritis (classes III, IV, or V), resulting in worse renal prognosis. The frequency of pathological conversion in class V is lower (33% and 43%, respectively) but equally clinically relevant, since almost all cases switched to a proliferative class. Therefore, repeat biopsy is highly advisable in patients with nonproliferative LN at baseline biopsy, because these patients have a reasonable likelihood of switch to a proliferative LN that may require more aggressive immunosuppression.In contrast, the majority of patients (82% and 73%) with proliferative classes in the reference biopsy (III, IV or mixed III/IV + V), remained into proliferative classes on repeat biopsy. Although rebiopsy in this group does not seem as necessary, it is still advisable since it will allow us to identify the 18% to 20% of patients that switch to a nonproliferative class. In addition, consistent with the reported clinical experience, repeat biopsy might also be helpful to identify selected cases with clear progression of proliferative lesions despite the initial treatment, for whom it is advisable to intensify inmunosuppression. Thus, our experience and the literature data support that repeat biopsy also brings more advantges than threats in this group.The results of the repeat biopsy led to a change in the immunosuppresive treatment in more than half of the patients on average, intensifying it in the majority of the cases, but also reducing it in 5% to 30%.

T-cell-directed therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Drug development for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has largely focused on B-cell therapies. A greater understanding of the immunopathogenesis of SLE coupled with advanced bioengineering has allowed for clinical trials centered on other targets for SLE therapy. The authors discuss the benefits and shortcomings of focusing on T-cell-directed therapies in SLE and lupus nephritis clinical trials.

Complement Alternative Pathway׳s Activation in Patients With Lupus Nephritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to detect the spectrum of complement activation pathways in circulation and to assess their correlations with clinical and pathologic features in a large lupus nephritis cohort from China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma levels of C1q, mannose-binding lectin, C4d, Bb, C3, C3a, C5a and soluble C5b-9 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 222 patients with active biopsy-proven lupus nephritis, 34 patients with lupus nephritis at remission, 82 patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus without renal involvement and 39 normal controls. The correlations between levels of complement components and clinicopathological features of these patients were further analyzed.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of C1q and C3 significantly decreased, and the levels of Bb, C3a, C5a and soluble C5b-9 were significantly elevated in patients with active lupus nephritis compared with those in remission, active systemic lupus erythematosus without renal involvement group and normal controls. In the lupus nephritis group, soluble C5b-9 levels were inversely correlated with C1q and C4d levels (r = -0.412, P < 0.001 and r = -0.221, P = 0.002, respectively), but more strongly correlated with the level of Bb (r = 0.546, P < 0.001). C3b, Bb and C5b-9 could colocalize on glomeruli in lupus nephritis. Plasma Bb level was significantly correlated with some renal disease activity indices and was a risk factor for renal outcomes (hazard ratio = 1.745; 95% CI: 1.106-2.754; P = 0.017) in the lupus nephritis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that the activation of the complement alternative pathway might play a more important role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, and factor Bb might be a useful marker for evaluating renal disease activity and outcomes.

Comparative effectiveness of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of high-quality meta-analyses and network meta-analyses of immunosuppressive drugs for lupus nephritis. Our objective was to assess the comparative benefits and harms of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids in lupus nephritis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of trials of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids in patients with lupus nephritis. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95 % credible intervals (CrI).

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria; data were analyzed for renal remission/response (37 trials; 2697 patients), renal relapse/flare (13 studies; 1108 patients), amenorrhea/ovarian failure (eight trials; 839 patients) and cytopenia (16 trials; 2257 patients). Cyclophosphamide [CYC] low dose (LD) and CYC high-dose (HD) were less likely than mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] and azathioprine [AZA], CYC LD, CYC HD and plasmapharesis less likely than cyclosporine [CSA] to achieve renal remission/response. Tacrolimus [TAC] was more likely than CYC LD to achieve renal remission/response. MMF and CYC were associated with a lower odds of renal relapse/flare compared to PRED and MMF was associated with a lower rate of renal relapse/flare than AZA. CYC was more likely than MMF and PRED to be associated with amenorrhea/ovarian failure. Compared to MMF, CYC, AZA, CYC LD, and CYC HD were associated with a higher risk of cytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and NMA, we found important differences between immunosuppressives used for the treatment of lupus nephritis. Patients and physicians can use this information for detailed informed consent in a patient-centered approach. Study limitations of between-study clinical heterogeneity and small sample size with type II error must be considered when interpreting these findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO

CRD42016032965.

Risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoids for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive medications and glucocorticoids in lupus nephritis.

METHODS

A trained librarian performed two searches: (1) PubMed for all lupus nephritis trials from the end dates for the systematic review for the 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) lupus nephritis treatment guidelines and the 2012 Cochrane Systematic Review on treatments for lupus nephritis, to September 2013; and (2) PubMed and SCOPUS for all lupus trials (excluding lupus nephritis) from inception to February 2014, to obtain additional trials for harms data in any lupus patient. The search was updated to May 2016. Duplicate title/abstract review and duplicate data abstractions by two abstractors independently was performed for all eligible studies, including those studies abstracted for the 2012 ACR lupus nephritis treatment guidelines and the 2012 Cochrane Systematic Review on lupus nephritis treatments. We performed a systematic review and a Bayesian NMA, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of immunosuppressive drugs or glucocorticoids in patients with lupus nephritis assessing serious infection risk. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods were used to model 95 % credible intervals (CrI). Sensitivity analyses examined the robustness of estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 32 RCTs with 2611 patients provided data. There were 26 two-arm, five three-arm, and one four-arm trials. We found that tacrolimus was associated with significantly lower risk of serious infections compared to glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and azathioprine (AZA) with odds ratios (95 % CrI) of 0.33 (0.12-0.88), 0.37 (0.15-0.87), 0.340 (0.18-0.81), and 0.32 (0.12-0.81), respectively. Conversely, CYC low dose (LD), CYC high dose (HD), and HD glucocorticoids were associated with higher odds of serious infections compared to tacrolimus, ranging from 4.84 to 12.83. We also found that MMF followed by AZA (MMF-AZA) was associated with significantly lower risk of serious infections as compared to CYC LD, CYC HD, CYC-AZA, or HD glucocorticoids with odds ratios (95 % CrI) of 0.09 (0.01-0.76), 0.07 (0.01-0.54), 0.14 (0.02-0.71), and 0.03 (0.00-0.56), respectively. Estimates were similar to pair-wise meta-analyses. Sensitivity analyses that varied estimate (odds ratio vs. Peto's odds ratio), method (random vs. fixed effects model), data (sepsis vs. serious infection data; exclusion of observational studies), treatment grouping (CYC and CYC HD as a combined treatment group vs. separate), made little/no difference to these estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus and MMF-AZA combination were associated with lower risk of serious infections compared to other immunosuppressive drugs or glucocorticoids for lupus nephritis. In conjunction with comparative efficacy data, these data can help patients make informed decisions about treatment options for lupus nephritis.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42016032965.

Treatments for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare benefits and harms of lupus nephritis (LN) induction and maintenance treatments.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and Bayesian network metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids (CS) in LN. OR and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 65 RCT that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Significantly lower risk of endstage renal disease (ESRD; 17 studies) was seen with cyclophosphamide (CYC; OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.25-0.92) or CYC + azathioprine (AZA; OR 0.18, 95% CrI 0.05-0.57) compared with standard-dose CS, and with high-dose (HD) CYC (OR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.03-0.61) or CYC + AZA (OR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.03-0.34) compared with HD CS. HD CS was associated with higher risk of ESRD compared with CYC (OR 3.59, 95% CrI 1.30-9.86), AZA (OR 2.93, 95% CrI 1.08-8.10), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; OR 7.05, 95% CrI 1.66-31.91). Compared with CS, a significantly higher proportion of patients had renal response (14 studies) when treated with CYC (OR 1.98, 95% CrI 1.13-3.52), MMF (OR 2.42, 95% CrI 1.27-4.74), or tacrolimus (TAC; OR 4.20, 95% CrI 1.29-13.68). No differences were noted for the risk of malignancy (15 studies). The risk of herpes zoster (17 studies) was as follows: OR (95% CrI) MMF versus CS 4.38 (1.02-23.87), CYC versus CS 6.64 (1.97-25.71), TAC versus CS 9.11 (1.13-70.99), and CYC + AZA versus CS 8.46 (1.99-43.61).

CONCLUSION

Renal benefits and the risk of herpes zoster were higher for immunosuppressive drugs versus CS. Data on relative and absolute differences are now available, which can be incorporated into patient-physician discussions related to systemic lupus erythematosus medication use.

Lessons Learned From the Clinical Trials of Novel Biologics and Small Molecules in Lupus Nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a ripe area for drug development. There are great unmet needs, especially for those with lupus nephritis, in which good responses occur only in the minority of treated patients. An expanded understanding of immunopathogenesis of SLE coupled with the availability of sophisticated bioengineering technologies has resulted in the ability to supply the lupus community with the reagents needed to perform clinical trials. However, drug development in SLE has proven to be particularly challenging. Only one drug, belimumab, has been approved for patients with SLE through the traditional route of randomized controlled trials. The basis for our failures is unknown, but most assuredly relates to trial design issues, confounding by background medicines, and the multiplicity of active biologic pathways in this disease. Off-label use of failed trial drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab paradoxically has become routine in many parts of the world. Despite the obstacles, there currently is unprecedented clinical trial activity in lupus nephritis, which most likely will lead to at least one drug approval in years to come.

The Efficacy and Safety of Leflunomide for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis in Chinese Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide as a new immunosuppressive medicine in lupus nephritis (LN) through a meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with cyclophosphamide in adult patients with LN was performed. Data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed before December 2014 was collected from several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and CBM). No language restrictions were applied. Efficacy outcomes included overall remission, SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, 24-hour proteinuria and serum creatinine. Safety data were analyzed. The effects of treatment on these outcomes were summarized as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences were pooled using a fixed or random effects model.

Results

Eleven RCTs with Jadad score of 3 or greater were identified and included a total of 254 patients. Cyclophosphamide was served as the control drug in all trials. The SLEDAI score, urine protein level and serum creatinine decreased significantly following leflunomide treatment (P<0.05). Leflunomide was superior to cyclophosphamide in achieving complete and total remission, but no difference in SLEDAI score was found between these two treatments (P>0.05). Additionally, patients receiving leflunomide treatment showed favorable renal function profiles, especially regarding the 24-hour proteinuria (mean difference: -0.58, 95%CI: -0.78~-0.37, P<0.01) and serum creatinine (mean difference: -0.20, 95%CI: -0.39~-0.01, P<0.05). In the safety comparison, leflunomide was safer than cyclophosphamide regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including liver damage (RR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.33~0.87, P<0.05), alopecia (RR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.17~0.85, P<0.05), leukopenia (RR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.08~0.77, P<0.05) and infection (RR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.32~0.92, P<0.05), without increased risk of gastrointestinal reaction, rash or herpes zoster infection.

Conclusions

Leflunomide is a promising therapy for LN treatment, primarily because of the comparable efficacy and favorable safety profile determined by this meta-analysis of RCTs. Larger RCTs with longer duration of observation are necessary to provide strong evidence of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in LN patients.

Renal Interstitial Arteriosclerotic Lesions in Lupus Nephritis Patients: A Cohort Study from China

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate renal arteriosclerotic lesions in patients with lupus nephritis and investigate their associations with clinical and pathological characteristics, especially cardio-vascular features.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Participants

Seventy-nine patients with renal biopsy-proven lupus nephritis, diagnosed between January 2000 and June 2008 from Peking University First Hospital.

Results

In clinico-pathological data, patients with arteriosclerosis had higher ratio of hypertension and more severe renal injury indices compared with patients with no renal vascular lesions. More importantly, patients with renal arteriosclerosis had worse cardiac structure and function under transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Patients with renal arteriosclerosis tend to have higher ratios of combined endpoints compared with those of no renal vascular lesions, although the difference didn’t reach statistical meanings (P = 0.104).

Conclusion

Renal arteriosclerotic lesion was common and associated with vascular immune complex deposits in lupus nephritis. It might have a certain degree of association with poor outcomes and cardiovascular events, which needs further explorations.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: review of synthetic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Synthetic drugs are prescribed for nearly all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a multisystem autoimmune disease, to ameliorate symptoms and positively influence outcome. While only 2 biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of SLE, synthetic drugs are still the mainstay of therapy in SLE. The highly variable and unpredictable course of SLE poses a challenge for physicians as to what drug(s) should be prescribed for which patient.

AREAS COVERED

Previous and recent studies have evaluated several synthetic drugs in the treatment of SLE. This article reviews currently available evidence for the efficacy and safety of synthetic drugs in SLE and discusses future treatment perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Hydroxychloroquine should be considered an anchor drug in SLE because of the multiple beneficial effects of this agent. When patients present with persistent disease activity despite hydroxychloroquine therapy or need higher dosages and/or prolonged use of glucocorticoids (GCs), additional immunosuppressants should be promptly prescribed. Based on available evidence, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the drugs of first choice. Determination of a 'safe' GC dose for chronic daily use is of major importance and should be subject of further studies in large patient populations.

Lupus Nephritis in Asia: Clinical Features and Management

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and severe organ involvement manifesting itself in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There is a considerable difference in prevalence, severity, treatment response and outcomes between Asian LN patients and LN patients from other racial backgrounds.

SUMMARY

Asian SLE patients have a higher prevalence of LN than Caucasian SLE patients and often present with a more severe disease. Increasing data from genetic studies, accompanied by progress in high-throughput genotyping, have advanced our knowledge about genetic predispositions that might partly contribute to the clinical variations observed. Corticosteroids combined with either cyclophosphamide (CYC) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the current standard-of-care induction regimen for severe LN irrespective of race or ethnicity. However, the preference for MPA or CYC, and possibly the optimum dose for MPA, is influenced by the patient's origin. Also, there is an insufficient evidence base for reduced-dose intravenous CYC in Asian patients. Health economics and access to prompt diagnosis and treatment are still challenging issues in some Asian regions. The former represents a significant obstacle limiting the access of patients to MPA despite the proven efficacy of the drug as an induction agent and its superiority over azathioprine (AZA) in preventing disease flares when used for long-term maintenance immunosuppression. Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus deserve further investigation in view of their additional effect on podocytes by reducing proteinuria and the promising data from Asian patients. Despite considerable advances in the clinical management of LN over the past few decades with resultant improvements in patients' outcomes, there are still knowledge gaps and unmet clinical needs. Asia has made substantial contributions to the evidence base that guides clinical management and continues to offer invaluable opportunities for research pursuits.

KEY MESSAGES

Treatment responses and clinical outcomes in Asian patients with LN compare favorably with patients from other parts of the world. The prevention and treatment of infective complications remain significant challenges in managing LN in Asia.

FACTS FROM EAST AND WEST

(1) The prevalence of SLE is lower among Caucasians than other ethnicities. A higher prevalence is observed among Asians and African Americans, while the highest prevalence is found in Caribbean people. The prevalence of LN in Asian SLE patients is much higher than in Caucasians as well. However, the 10-year renal outcome and renal survival rate appear to be better in Asians. (2) Polymorphisms of genes involved in the immune response, such as Fcγ receptor, integrin alpha M, TNF superfamily 4, myotubularin-related protein 3 and many others, might be partly responsible for the differences in prevalence between the different ethnic groups. European ancestry was shown to be associated with a decrease in the risk of LN even after adjustment for genes most associated with renal disease. (3) Access to health care is a key determinant of disease progression, treatment outcome and the management of complications such as infections, particularly in South Asia, and might also explain disparities between clinical outcomes. (4) The efficacy of low-dose CYC combined with corticosteroids for induction treatment of LN was proved in European Caucasian patients. This treatment is also used in Asia, although no formal evaluation of efficacy and safety in comparison with other treatment regimens exists in this population. The efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is similar to that of CYC, and similar between Asians and Caucasians. MMF may be more effective than CYC in inducing response in high-risk populations such as African American or Hispanic patients. MMF might cause less infection-related events in Asians, but its high cost prevents broader usage at present. (5) For maintenance therapy, corticosteroid combined with AZA or MMF is used worldwide, with a broadly similar efficacy of both treatments, although there are data suggesting that in high-risk populations (e.g. African Americans) MMF may be more effective in preventing renal flares. AZA is often preferred in Asia due to economic constraints and because of its safety in pregnancy. (6) Alternative therapies under investigation include rituximab, which might be more efficient in Caucasians, as well as belimumab. Recent Japanese and Chinese studies have indicated a potential benefit of tacrolimus as a substitute for or in addition to CYC or MMF (dual or triple immunosuppression). Mizoribine is used in Japan exclusively.

Multitarget therapy for induction treatment of lupus nephritis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) remains challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a multitarget therapy consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide and steroid as induction therapy for LN.

DESIGN

24-week randomized, open-label, multicenter study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00876616).

SETTING

26 renal centers in China.

PATIENTS

Adults (aged 18 to 65 years) with biopsy-proven LN.

INTERVENTION

Tacrolimus, 4 mg/d, and mycophenolate mofetil, 1.0 g/d, versus intravenous cyclophosphamide with a starting dose of 0.75 (adjusted to 0.5 to 1.0) g/m2 of body surface area every 4 weeks for 6 months. Both groups received 3 days of pulse methylprednisolone followed by a tapering course of oral prednisone therapy.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end point was complete remission at 24 weeks. Secondary end points included overall response (complete and partial remission), time to overall response, and adverse events.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks of therapy, more patients in the multitarget group (45.9%) than in the intravenous cyclophosphamide group (25.6%) showed complete remission (difference, 20.3 percentage points [95% CI, 10.0 to 30.6 percentage points]; P < 0.001). The overall response incidence was higher in the multitarget group than in the intravenous cyclophosphamide group (83.5% vs. 63.0%; difference, 20.4 percentage points [CI, 10.3 to 30.6 percentage points]; P < 0.001), and the median time to overall response was shorter in the multitarget group (difference, -4.1 weeks [CI, -7.9 to -2.1 weeks]). Incidence of adverse events did not differ between the multitarget and intravenous cyclophosphamide groups (50.3% [91 of 181] vs. 52.5% [95 of 181]).

LIMITATION

The study was limited to 24 weeks of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Multitarget therapy provides superior efficacy compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for LN.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Basic Research Program of China, National Key Technology R&D Program.

Leflunomide plus oral prednisone in treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a retrospective clinical study of efficacy and safety

AIM

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains a controversial issue. While clinical trials have shown that some immunosuppressants combined with glucocorticoid have a good efficacy on IMN patients. However, there is little data on leflunomide (LEF) in treatment of IMN.

METHODS

Records of every patient with biopsy-proven IMN in Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2005 to December 2011 (n=194) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with nephrotic IMN were treated with LEF plus oral prednisone (n=32) for at least 12 months, whereas 31 patients who did not receive any immunosuppressants were used as controls.

RESULTS

Remission rates in the LEF group were 31.3%, 59.4%, 68.8% and 71.9% at 6, 9, 12 and 15 months, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in controls. In the LEF group, proteinuria decreased from 6.79 g/24 h at baseline to 5.63 g/24 h (P<0.01), 3.85 g/24 h (P<0.01) and 2.51 g/24 h (P<0.01) after treatment for 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. Relapse occurred in five (21.7%) patients within a median of 14 months (range, 8-27) after cessation of LEF. No patients developed renal insufficiency during the therapeutic period. Multivariate analysis suggested that age negatively correlated with achievement of remission (odds ratio, 0.87; P<0.05). No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

LEF plus oral prednisone may be an alternative treatment option in Chinese patients with nephrotic IMN.

Podocyte involvement in lupus nephritis based on the 2003 ISN/RPS system: a large cohort study from a single centre

OBJECTIVE

The podocyte lesion in LN is still an intriguing controversy. We assess the associations between podocyte lesions and clinico-pathological features in a large cohort of LN patients.

METHODS

The clinico-pathological data of 202 patients with renal biopsy-proven LN were retrospectively studied. The degree of podocyte lesions was assessed morphologically and its correlations with clinico-pathological parameters were further analysed.

RESULTS

The podocyte foot processes of most LN patients significantly effaced, reflected by the median foot process width (FPW) of 1397.39 nm, and 13 patients met the histological criteria of lupus podocytopathy. The FPW was correlated with proteinuria (r = 0.509, P < 0.001) and the cut-off value of FPW, >1240 nm, could differentiate nephrotic proteinuria from non-nephrotic proteinuria with sensitivity 81.5% and specificity 62.7%. The FPW varied significantly with different types of LN, and the patients with combined LN presented with the most severe lesions. The complete remission rate was significantly higher and the long-term renal outcome was better in the group with calcineurin inhibitors than that with other regimens in patients with FPW >1240 nm.

CONCLUSION

Podocyte damage was common in LN. Pure lupus podocytopathy might act as an extreme form of lupus podocyte lesion, and more patients might present with severe podocyte effacement concealed in different types of LN, which needs further investigation.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: a therapeutic challenge for the XXI century

Despite significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), there are only a few drugs approved by the regulatory agencies across the world for the treatment of these patients; in fact, many of the compounds subjected to clinical trials have failed in achieving their primary endpoints. Current therapeutic options include antimalarials which should be used in all SLE patients unless they are strongly contraindicated, glucocorticoids which should be used at the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible time, and immunosuppressive drugs which should be used judiciously, mainly in patients with severe organ involvements or receiving high doses of steroids to control their disease. Despite improvement on the survival of SLE patients, damage accrual has not varied over the last few decades, reflecting a gap between these therapeutic options and the expectations of these patients and their treating physicians. Biologic compounds can be used in some refractory cases. However, their cost is of great concern for both the patients and the health system. Cost is of special importance in low-income countries, because low-income SLE patients tend to experience a more severe disease having an overall worse prognosis which is compounded by their limited access to the health system. Although a treatment to target based on defined molecular pathways for specific disease subsets is appealing, this is not yet a reality. This review addressed current therapeutic options for SLE patients and the state of the art of investigational drugs targeting pathogenic pathways identified in these patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of Chinese patients with scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis: a large cohort study from a single center

Objective. To assess clinicopathological characteristics of lupus nephritis patients with scanty immune deposits. Methods. The data of patients with scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis were retrospectively analyzed. Plasma ANCA and complement components were detected. Results. Among 316 cases with renal biopsy-proven lupus nephritis, 40 cases were diagnosed as scanty immune deposits. There were significantly higher value of serum creatinine (P = 0.002) and lower hemoglobin level (P = 0.009) and higher score of cellular crescents (P = 0.015) in scanty immune deposits group compared with immune complex deposits group. The frequency of positive plasma ANCA was significantly higher in scanty immune deposits group than that in immune complex deposits group (52.5% versus 10.1%, P < 0.001). As for comparisons of plasma complement components, there were significantly higher levels of C1q (P = 0.005) and Bb (P = 0.02) and lower level of factor H (P = 0.003) in scanty immune deposits group. The ratio of treatment failure was significantly higher in scanty immune deposits group than that in immune deposits group (42.5% versus 19.20%, P = 0.001). The renal outcomes were similar between the two groups. Conclusions. Patients with scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis had more severe kidney damage. ANCA and activation of complement alternative pathway might be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Overview of lupus nephritis management guidelines and perspective from Asia

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and important manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Evidence suggests higher rates of lupus renal involvement in Asian populations, and maybe more severe nephritis, compared with other racial or ethnic groups. The management of LN has evolved considerably over the past three decades, based on observations from clinical studies that investigated different immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, calcineurin inhibitors and novel biologic therapies. This is accompanied by improvements in both the short-term treatment response rate and long-term renal function preservation. Treatment guidelines for LN have recently been issued by rheumatology and nephrology communities in U.S.A. and Europe. In view of the racial difference in disease manifestation and response to therapy, and the substantial disease burden in Asia, a panel of 15 nephrologists and rheumatologists from different Asian regions with extensive experience in lupus nephritis - the Steering Group for the Asian Lupus Nephritis Network (ALNN) - met and discussed the management of lupus nephritis in Asian patients. The group has also reviewed and deliberated on the recently published recommendations from other parts of the world. This manuscript summarizes the discussions by the group and presents consensus views on the clinical management and treatment of adult Asian patients with LN, taking into account both the available evidence and expert opinion in areas where evidence remains to be sought.

EULAR evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations on the management of medium to high-dose glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases

To develop recommendations for the management of medium to high-dose (ie, >7.5 mg but ≤100 mg prednisone equivalent daily) systemic glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in rheumatic diseases. A multidisciplinary EULAR task force was formed, including rheumatic patients. After discussing the results of a general initial search on risks of GC therapy, each participant contributed 10 propositions on key clinical topics concerning the safe use of medium to high-dose GCs. The final recommendations were selected via a Delphi consensus approach. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was used to identify evidence concerning each of the propositions. The strength of recommendation was given according to research evidence, clinical expertise and patient preference. The 10 propositions regarded patient education and informing general practitioners, preventive measures for osteoporosis, optimal GC starting dosages, risk-benefit ratio of GC treatment, GC sparing therapy, screening for comorbidity, and monitoring for adverse effects. In general, evidence supporting the recommendations proved to be surprisingly weak. One of the recommendations was rejected, because of conflicting literature data. Nine final recommendations for the management of medium to high-dose systemic GC therapy in rheumatic diseases were selected and evaluated with their strengths of recommendations. Robust evidence was often lacking; a research agenda was created.

Overview of lupus nephritis management guidelines and perspective from Asia

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and important manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Evidence suggests higher rates of lupus renal involvement in Asian populations, and maybe more severe nephritis, compared with other racial or ethnic groups. The management of LN has evolved considerably over the past three decades, based on observations from clinical studies that investigated different immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, calcineurin inhibitors and novel biologic therapies. This is accompanied by improvements in both the short-term treatment response rate and long-term renal function preservation. Treatment guidelines for LN have recently been issued by rheumatology and nephrology communities in U.S.A. and Europe. In view of the racial difference in disease manifestation and response to therapy, and the substantial disease burden in Asia, a panel of 15 nephrologists and rheumatologists from different Asian regions with extensive experience in lupus nephritis - the Steering Group for the Asian Lupus Nephritis Network (ALNN) - met and discussed the management of lupus nephritis in Asian patients. The group has also reviewed and deliberated on the recently published recommendations from other parts of the world. This manuscript summarizes the discussions by the group and presents consensus views on the clinical management and treatment of adult Asian patients with LN, taking into account both the available evidence and expert opinion in areas where evidence remains to be sought.

Refractory Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Objective: To review the literature available regarding treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) refractory to cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and glucocorticoids. Data Sources: PubMed-MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were searched through June 2013 using the terms lupus nephritis, refractory, induction, systemic lupus erythematosus, diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis, rituximab, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, leflunomide, mizoribine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and belimumab. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Included studies were limited to human studies that evaluated clinical efficacy and English language articles. Articles assessing treatment with first-line agents such as glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, and azathioprine were excluded from this review. Data Synthesis: There are an increasing number of medications being used in refractory LN, making the selection of an appropriate agent more difficult. Thirty studies evaluating the treatment of LN with alternative agents were identified. Although rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors have demonstrated the ability to induce remission in approximately 60% of patients with LN, large randomized trials have not confirmed these results. Leflunomide, mizoribine, and intravenous immunoglobulin have revealed potential benefits in some patient populations; however, there is not enough data to support the regular use of these agents for refractory LN. Conclusions: Rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors have the most evidence to support their use and should be the preferred agents in the treatment of refractory LN at this time. Further studies may elucidate the efficacy of other agents for refractory LN.