Precision medicine in lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a prominent manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), characterized by diverse clinical and histopathological features, imposing a substantial burden on patients. Although the exact cause of SLE remain undetermined, several genetic, epigenetics, hormonal, and other factors are implicated in LN pathogenesis. The management of LN rely on invasive renal biopsies, while the standard therapy of the proliferative form of LN remains empirical and relies on indiscriminate immunosuppressants (IS). These treatments exhibit unsatisfactory remission rates, trigger recurrent renal flares, and entail grave adverse effects (ADEs). The advent of precision medicine into LN entails a concentrated effort to pinpoint essential biomarkers, reshaping the landscape of LN management. The primary objective of this review is to synthesize and summarize existing research findings by elucidating the most prevalent immunological, genetic, and epigenetic alterations and deliberate on management strategies that can pave the way for precision medicine in tackling LN. Novel clinical biomarker such as serum anti-complement component 1q (anti-C1q), with urinary markers including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1) and tumour necrosis-like weak inducers of apoptosis (TWEAK) are strongly correlated with LN. These biomarkers have good sensitivity and specificity and perform better than conventional biomarkers in assessing LN activity. Similarly, more renal-specific genetic and epigenetic alteration have been correlated with LN susceptibility and severity. This includes variants of hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). In the future, integrating clinical, genetic, epigenetic, and targeted therapies holds promise for guiding precision medicine and improving LN outcomes.

Methylprednisolone Pulses and Prolonged Remission in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Propensity Score Analysis of the Longitudinal Lupus-Cruces-Bordeaux Inception Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of methylprednisolone pulses (MP), given during the first year after the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in achieving prolonged remission according to the degree of lupus activity at presentation.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of routine clinical care data from the Lupus-Cruces-Bordeaux cohort. The end point was prolonged remission (ie, during five consecutive yearly visits). The effect of MP on remission during the first year was analyzed in the whole cohort and according to the baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score: <6, 6 to 12, and >12, reflecting mild, moderate, and severe activity, respectively. For adjustment, logistic regression with propensity score (PS) and other therapeutic covariates was performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three patients were included. Prolonged remission was achieved by 132 patients (57%). MP were associated with prolonged remission (PS-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-623, P = 0.042). A strong clinical effect was seen among patients with moderate (adjusted OR 5.28, 95% CI 1.27-21.97, P = 0.022) and moderate-severe SLE activity (adjusted OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.11-14.82, P = 0.033). The administration of MP resulted in reduced average dosages of prednisone during the first year among patient with moderate (mean 6.6 vs 10.2 mg/day, P = 0.017) and severe activity (mean 14 vs 28 mg/day, P = 0.015). The odds of prolonged remission were increased by longer-term use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and decreased by higher initial doses of prednisone.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of MP to induce prolonged remission in patients with SLE, particularly in those with moderate and severe activity. The extended use of HCQ also contributes to achieve prolonged remission.

Intermittent pulses of methylprednisolone with low-dose prednisone attenuate lupus symptoms in B6.MRL-Faslpr/J mice with fewer glucocorticoid side effects

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant medications and remain the cornerstone of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy. However, ongoing exposure to GCs has the potential to elicit multiple adverse effects. Considering the irreplaceability of GCs in SLE therapy, it is important to explore the optimal regimen of GCs. Here, we compared the long-term efficacy and safety of pulsed and oral GC therapy in a lupus-prone mouse model. Mice were grouped using a randomized block design. We monitored survival rates, proteinuria, serum autoantibodies, and complement 3 (C3) levels up to 28 weeks of age, and assessed renal damage, bone quality, lipid deposition in the liver and marrow, glucose metabolic parameters, and levels of hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Finally, we explored the mechanisms underlying the superior efficacy of the pulse regimen over oral prednisone regimen. We found that both GC regimens alleviated the poor survival rate, proteinuria, and glomerulonephritis, while also reducing serum autoantibodies and increasing the level of C3. The pulsed GC regimen showed less resistance to insulin, less suppression of the HPA axis, less bone loss, and less bone marrow fat deposition than the oral GC regimen. Additionally, GC-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) was significantly overexpressed in the GC pulse group. These results suggest that the GC pulse regimen ameliorated symptoms in lupus-prone mice, with fewer side effects, which may be related to GILZ overexpression. Our findings offer a potentially promising GC treatment option for SLE.

Baricitinib and Pulse Steroids Combination Treatment in Hyperinflammatory COVID-19: A Rheumatological Approach in the Intensive Care Unit

Hyperinflammatory Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and rapidly-progressive interstitial lung diseases (RP-ILD) secondary to inflammatory myopathies (IIM) present important similarities. These data support the use of anti-rheumatic drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combining baricitinib and pulse steroids with the Standard of Care (SoC) for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with COVID-19-pneumonia. Patients treated with SoC (dexamethasone plus remdesivir) were compared to patients treated with baricitinib plus 6-methylprednisolone pulses (Rheuma-group). We enrolled 246 patients: 104/246 in the SoC and 142/246 in the Rheuma-group. All patients presented laboratory findings suggestive of hyperinflammatory response. Sixty-four patients (26.1%) died during ICU hospitalization. The mortality rate in the Rheuma-group was significantly lower than in the SoC-group (15.5 vs. 40.4%, p < 0.001). Compared to the SoC-group, patients in the Rheuma-group presented significantly lower inflammatory biomarker levels after one week of treatment. Higher ferritin levels after one week of treatment were strongly associated with mortality (p < 0.001). In this large real-life COVID-19 cohort, baricitinib and pulse steroids led to a significant reduction in mortality, paralleled by a prompt reduction in inflammatory biomarkers. Our experience supports the similarities between hyperinflammatory COVID-19 and the IIM-associated RP-ILD.

A path to Glucocorticoid Stewardship: a critical review of clinical recommendations for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have revolutionized the management of SLE, providing patients with rapid symptomatic relief and preventing flares when maintained at low dosages. However, there are increasing concerns over GC-associated adverse effects and organ damage, which decrease patients' quality of life (QOL) and increase healthcare costs. This highlights the need to balance effective GC use and minimize toxicity in patients with SLE. Herein, we provide an overview of the theoretical considerations and clinical evidence, in addition to the variations and similarities across nine national and eight international recommendations regarding the use of GCs across SLE manifestations and how these compare with real-world usage. In line with this, we propose possible actions toward the goal of GC Stewardship to improve the QOL for patients with lupus while managing the disease burden.

Prednisone combined with Dihydroartemisinin attenuates systemic lupus erythematosus by regulating M1/M2 balance through the MAPK signaling pathway

OBJECTIVE

Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plays a very important role in various diseases. However, the precise involvement of DHA in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), relation to the equilibrium between M1 and M2 cells, remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the role of DHA in SLE and its effect on the M1/M2 cells balance.

METHODS

SLE mice model was established by pristane induction. Flow cytometry was employed to measure the abundance of M1 and M2 cells within the peripheral blood of individuals diagnosed with SLE. The concentrations of various cytokines, namely TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10, within the serum of SLE patients or SLE mice were assessed via ELISA. Immunofluorescence staining was utilized to detect the deposition of IgG and complement C3 in renal tissues of the mice. We conducted immunohistochemistry analysis to assess the expression levels of Collagen-I, a collagen protein, and α-SMA, a fibrosis marker protein, in the renal tissues of mice. Hematoxylin-eosin staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and Periodic acid Schiff staining were used to examine histological alterations. In this study, we employed qPCR and western blot techniques to assess the expression levels of key molecular markers, namely CD80 and CD86 for M1 cells, as well as CD206 and Arg-1 for M2 cells, within kidney tissue. Additionally, we investigated the involvement of the MAPK signaling pathway. The Venny 2.1 online software tool was employed to identify shared drug-disease targets, and subsequently, the Cytoscape 3.9.2 software was utilized to construct the "disease-target-ingredient" network diagram. Protein-protein interactions of the target proteins were analyzed using the String database, and the network proteins underwent enrichment analysis for Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways.

RESULTS

The results showed that an increase in M1 cells and a decrease in M2 cells within the peripheral blood of individuals diagnosed with SLE. Further analysis revealed that prednisone (PDN) combined with DHA can alleviate kidney damage and regulate the balance of M1 and M2 cells in both glomerular mesangial cells (GMC) and kidney. The MAPK signaling pathway was found to be involved in SLE kidney damage and M1/M2 balance in the kidney. Furthermore, PDN and/or DHA were found to inhibit the MAPK signaling pathway in GMC and kidney.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that PDN combined with DHA attenuates SLE by regulating M1/M2 balance through MAPK signaling pathway. These findings propose that the combination of PDN and DHA could serve as a promising therapeutic strategy for SLE, as it has the potential to mitigate kidney damage and reinstate the equilibrium of M1 and M2 cells.

Balancing risks and benefits in the use of hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and glucocorticoids (GCs) constitute the oldest and more used drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite this long experience, both are still subject to a number of uncertainties, mainly regarding the dose.

AREAS COVERED

We review the main mechanisms of action, the clinical and toxic effects of HCQ and GCs and analyze the recommendations for the use of both in guidelines published since 2018. We offer a set of recommendations based on the pharmacology, mechanisms of action and clinical evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

HCQ is the backbone therapy for SLE, and a judicious use must be accomplished, using doses that allow a good control of lupus without compromising the safety of treatments very much prolonged over the time. Stable doses of 200 mg/day seem to accomplish both conditions. GCs should be used more judiciously, with methyl-prednisolone pulses as the main therapy for inducing rapid remission and doses ≤5-2.5 mg/day be never exceeded in long-term maintenance treatments.

The Link Between Dysregulated Immunometabolism and Vascular Damage: Implications for the Development of Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Rheumatic Diseases

A bimodal pattern of mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exists. Early-stage deaths are predominantly caused by infection, whereas later-stage deaths are mainly caused by atherosclerotic disease. Further, although SLE-related mortality has reduced considerably in recent years, cardiovascular (CV) events remain one of the leading causes of death in people with SLE. Accelerated atherosclerosis in SLE is attributed to both an increase in traditional CV risk factors and the inflammatory effects of SLE itself. Many of these changes occur within the microenvironment of the vascular-immune interface, the site of atherosclerotic plaque development. Here, an intimate interaction between endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and immune cells dictates physiological vs pathological responses to a chronic type 1 interferon environment. Low-density neutrophils (LDNs) have also been implicated in eliciting vasculature-damaging effects at such lesion sites. These changes are thought to be governed by dysfunctional metabolism of immune cells in this niche due at least in part to the chronic induction of type 1 interferons. Understanding these novel pathophysiological mechanisms and metabolic pathways may unveil potential innovative pharmacological targets and therapeutic opportunities for atherosclerosis, as well as shed light on the development of premature atherosclerosis in patients with SLE who develop CV events.

Which extra-renal flare is 'difficult to treat' in systemic lupus erythematosus? A one-year longitudinal study comparing traditional and machine learning approaches

OBJECTIVES

To describe phenotypes and outcomes of extra-renal flares in SLE, to identify clusters of extra-renal flares based on baseline features, and to develop a machine learning (ML) tool capable of predicting 'difficult to treat' (D2T) flares.

METHODS

Extra-renal flares that occurred in our cohort over the last five years with at least one year of follow-up were included. Baseline clinical variables were described and flares assigned to clusters. Attainment of remission and low disease activity state (LLDAS) at 12 months were compared. Flares were then considered 'D2T' in case of non-attainment of LLDAS at 6 and 12 months. Baseline features were used to train a ML model able to predict future D2T-flares, at admission. Traditional approaches were then compared with informatic techniques.

RESULTS

Among 420 SLE patients of the cohort, 114 flares occurred between 2015 and 2021; 79 extra-renal flares, predominantly mucocutaneous (24.1%) and musculoskeletal (45.6%), were considered. After 12 months, 79.4% and 49.4% were in LLDAS and in remission, respectively, while 17 flares were classified as D2T (21.5%); D2T flares received a higher cumulative and daily dose of glucocorticoids. Among the clusters, cluster 'D' (mild-moderate flares with mucocutaneous manifestations in patients with history of skin involvement) was associated with the lowest rate of remission. Among clinical data, not being on LLDAS at 3 months was the unique independent predictor of D2T flares.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clusterization well separates extra-renal flares according to their baseline features and may propose a new identification standard. D2T flares, especially refractory skin manifestations, are frequent in SLE and represent an unmet need in the management of the disease as they are associated with higher glucocorticoid (GC) dosage and risk of damage accrual. Our ML model could help in the early identification of D2T flares, flagging them to elevate the attention threshold at admission.

Is it safe to withdraw low-dose glucocorticoids in SLE patients in remission?

Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain a cornerstone of the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Numerous studies have emphasized the risk of damage accrual in SLE patient treated with GC, but currently, it is not possible to dissociate favorable and undesirable effects of GCs because their underlying mechanisms are entangled at the molecular level. Here, we review whether available data suggest that it is possible, feasible and desirable to taper and discontinue GC treatment in SLE. The main potential concern with GC withdrawal is the risk of SLE flare, which is strongly associated with increased organ damage, mortality, healthcare costs, decreased quality of life and work productivity. While most studies have assumed the cut off point for low doses (e.g. 7.5/mg/d) as the limit for safety, it is still controversial whether lower doses may influence damage accrual long-term. Also, a recent randomized trial has shown that a daily dose of 5 mg of prednisone in SLE patients in short-term remission can prevent up to 50-75% of flares, with an acceptable safety profile. However, this treatment is not mandatory for all patients. Yet, several observational studies highlight that discontinuation of GC is associated with lower damage accrual. Currently, we do not have a reliable method to identify patients who may require long-term low-dose GC. Therefore, further research is needed to identify a subgroup at high risk of relapse who would benefit from continuing prednisone. In the meantime, when considering the discontinuation of very low-dose prednisone, the decision must be individualized, as HCQ and conventional immunosuppressive agents are not without risk of side effects.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and glucocorticoids: A never-ending story?

Glucocorticoids (GCs) continue to be essential agents for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus, since there are no other drugs able to active remission of active disease so rapidly. However, their potential for causing irreversible damage greatly limit their use. Fortunately, some strategies may help take advantage of their huge anti-inflammatory power while limiting GC-induced side effects. This article reviews the pharmacological basis of GC action and their translation into the clinical ground. We also offer the practical approach for the use of GC in induction and maintenance therapy as well as the strategies for GC withdrawal of the respective practice of the authors. The three main basic principles are a) using methyl-prednisolone pulses to induce remission not only in severe disease; b) limiting initial doses of prednisone to ≤30 mg/d, with rapid tapering to ≤5 mg/d, which should be the dose for maintenance therapy; and c) individualizing the decision and the strategy to withdraw GCs. Long-term therapy with HCQ and the early introduction of immunosuppressive treatment would help achieve these objectives.

Evolution of diagnosis and treatment for lupus nephritis in Spain

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus that can lead to end-stage renal disease. Many clinical and prognostic data on which our therapeutic decisions are based come from international cohorts, which have important ethnic and prognostic differences. To identify clinical and prognostic data from patients with LN in Spain, we undertook a bibliographic search of NL-related papers by Spanish authors and published in national and international journals between 2005 and 2022. According to the selected references, renal biopsy is not only essential for LN diagnosis but its repetition can be useful for the follow-up. Regarding LN treatment, standard strategy consists of an induction phase and a maintenance phase. However, as new drugs have been released, a new paradigm of treatment in a single, continuing and personalized phase has been proposed.

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: characteristics and the prospect of glucocorticoid pulse therapy

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is an autoimmune disease that results in significant damage and often needs more aggressive treatment. Compared to adult-onset SLE, cSLE has a stronger genetic background and more prevalent elevated type I Interferon expression. The management of cSLE is more challenging because the disease itself and treatment can affect physical, psychological and emotional growth and development. High dose oral glucocorticoid (GC) has become the rule for treating moderate to severe cSLE activity. However, GC-related side effects and potential toxicities are problems that cannot be ignored. Recent studies have suggested that GC pulse therapy can achieve disease remission rapidly and reduce GC-related side effects with a reduction in oral prednisone doses. This article reviews characteristics, including pathogenesis and manifestations of cSLE, and summarized the existing evidence on GC therapy, especially on GC pulse therapy in cSLE, followed by our proposal for GC therapy according to the clinical effects and pathogenesis.

Intravenous cyclophosphamide improves functional outcomes in interstitial lung disease related to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, toxicity and glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effects of intravenous cyclophosphamide (iv CYC) with other immunosuppressive regimes as the induction treatment for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy-Related Interstitial Lung Disease (IIM-ILD).

METHODS

Observational comparative study of patients with IIM-ILD from the EPIMAR and Cruces cohorts. The main efficacy outcome was a 6 to 12-month improvement >10% in the forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 patients were included: 22 (47%) in the CYC group and 25 (53%) in the non-CYC group (32% azathioprine, 28% GC alone, 20% mycophenolate, 16% calcineurin-inhibitors and methotrexate and 4% rituximab). 81% patients were female with a mean age of 50.4 years. FVC improvement was achieved by 64% patients in the CYC group vs. 32% in the non-CYC group (p = 0.03). In the logistic regression model, CYC was identified as the only independent predictor of FVC improvement (OR=3.97, 95% CI 1.07-14.75). Patients in the CYC group received more methyl-prednisolone pulses (MP) (59% vs. 28% in the non-CYC group, p = 0.03), less initial GCs doses >30 mg/d (19% vs. 77%, p = 0.001) and lower 6-month average doses of prednisone (11 mg/d vs. 31.1 mg/d, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

iv CYC showed better functional outcomes than other immunosuppressants in IIM-ILD. The additional use of MP is likely to potentiate the effects of CYC and allows lowering prednisone doses. Therefore, CYC in combination with MP could be considered as the first line induction therapy in IIM-ILD, without limiting its use to rapidly progressive, life-threatening or refractory disease.

Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index scores by domain in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with avacopan versus standard prednisone taper: post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial

BACKGROUND

The ADVOCATE trial, in which the complement C5a receptor inhibitor avacopan was compared with a standard prednisone taper in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, used the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) to measure glucocorticoid toxicity change. We set out to do a post-hoc analysis of the ADVOCATE data to evaluate changes in individual GTI domains and their ability to differentiate treatment groups.

METHODS

The ADVOCATE trial was a phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial comparing oral avacopan (30 mg) twice daily for 52 weeks plus a prednisone-matching placebo for 20 weeks with oral prednisone tapered over 20 weeks plus an avacopan-matching placebo for 52 weeks in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. GTI data were collected within each of the included domains (BMI, blood pressure, glucose tolerance, lipid metabolism, glucocorticoid myopathy, skin toxicity, neuropsychiatric effects, and infections) at baseline, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks. In this post-hoc analysis, we calculated the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and aggregate improvement score (AIS) for each GTI domain, assessed to what extend each domain contributed to the GTI score, and which domains differentiated between the avacopan and prednisone groups. Differences in domain scores between the two groups were compared using Mantel-Haenszel χ2 tests.

FINDINGS

Among the 330 patients included in the intention-to-treat population of the ADVOCATE trial, 321 (97%) had complete data at week 13 (160 in the avacopan group, and 161 in the prednisone group), and 307 (93%) had complete data at week 26 (154 in the avacopan group, and 153 in the prednisone group) and were assessed in this post-hoc study. In ADVOCATE, mean age in both groups was 61 years (61·2 years [SD 14·6] in the avacopan group; 60·5 years [14·5] in the prednisone group); 98 (59%) of 166 patients in the avacopan group were men and 68 (41%) were women; 88 (54%) of 164 patients in the prednisone group were men and 76 (46%) were women. 278 (84%) of 330 patients were White. The mean glucocorticoid use over 26 weeks was lower in the avacopan group than the prednisone group (1073 mg [SD 1669] vs 3192 mg [1174]). Significantly less glucocorticoid toxicity was observed in the avacopan group than the prednisone group by week 13 in four domains of the GTI (BMI, glucose tolerance, lipid metabolism, and skin toxicity), based on both the CWS and AIS. CWS values in the BMI, lipid metabolism, and skin toxicity domains were significantly lower in the avacopan group than the prednisone group at 26 weeks. No domain favoured the prednisone group for glucocorticoid toxicity reduction. 280 (91%) of 307 patients had glucocorticoid toxicity at 26 weeks. Blood pressure (35% in the avacopan group vs 25% in the prednisone group), infection (22% vs 24%), and lipid metabolism (20% vs 15%) contributed the most weight toward CWS values at 26 weeks. 128 (42%) of 307 patients had combinations of improvement and worsening in different domains at 26 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Replacing a standard prednisone taper with avacopan in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis reduced glucocorticoid toxicity in multiple GTI domains. For individual patients, glucocorticoid toxicity was often nuanced, improving in some domains while worsening in others. These findings emphasise the value of a composite measure of glucocorticoid toxicity that quantifies cumulative worsening and aggregate change directly.

FUNDING

ChemoCentryx.

Glucocorticoid tapering and associated outcome in patients with newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: the real-world GULP prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

A subanalysis of the multicentre Early Lupus inception cohort was performed to investigate the real-world Glucocorticoids (GCs) Use in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Patients (GULP).

METHODS

Patients starting prednisone (PDN) ≥5 mg/day and concomitant hydroxychloroquine or immunosuppressant within 12 months of SLE classification were enrolled. Core set variables were recorded at baseline and every 6 months, including changes in PDN dose, European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index. Regression models analysed predictors of tapering PDN<5 mg/day at any time and outcomes associated with different patterns of GCs tapering.

RESULTS

The GULP study included 127 patients with SLE; 73 (57.5%) tapered and maintained PDN <5 mg/day, and 17 (13.4%) discontinued PDN within a 2-year follow-up. Renal involvement (HR: 0.41; p=0.009) and lower C3 serum levels (HR: 1.04; p=0.025) predicted a lack of PDN tapering below 5 mg/day. High ECLAM scores were associated with a greater probability of increasing PDN dose (OR: 1.6; p=0.004), independently of daily intake. Disease relapse rate did not statistically differ (p=0.706) between patients tapering PDN <5 mg/day (42/99, 42.4%) and those tapering PDN without dropping below 5 mg/day (13/28, 46.4%). Every month on PDN <5 mg/day associated with lower damage accrual (IRR: 0.96; p=0.007), whereas never tapering PDN <5 mg/day associated with a higher risk of developing GC-related damage (OR 5.9; p=0.014).

CONCLUSION

Tapering PDN <5 mg/day was achieved and maintained in half of newly diagnosed patients with SLE and may represent a good balance between the need to prevent damage accrual and the risk of disease relapse.

Impact of severe infections in SLE: an observational study from the Spanish national registry

OBJECTIVE

Infections are a common complication of SLE. Our objective was to evaluate their causes and impact on the survival of patients with SLE.

METHODS

Analysis of the admissions and death causes in patients diagnosed with SLE from the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database and the infection-related deaths of the Spanish population from the National Statistical Institute, between 2016 and 2018.Only infections recorded as the main diagnosis were analysed (severe or clinically relevant infection).

RESULTS

Among 18 430 admissions in patients with SLE, disease activity was the cause of admission in 19% of all patients and infection in 15%. However, infection was the main cause of death (25%) while SLE activity was responsible for only 6% of deaths (p<0.001). Severe infection exceeded SLE as a cause of death for patients dying at ages between 40-59 (23% vs 4%, p<0.001), 60-79 (26% vs 6%, p<0.001) and older than 80 years (25% vs 6%, p<0.001). Infection was the cause of death in 8% of the Spanish population, a significantly lower rate when compared with patients with SLE (p<0.001). Compared with the general population, infections were the highest relative cause of death in patients with SLE, particularly at younger ages: 40% vs 3% for those below 20 years old (p<0.01), 33% vs 4% between 20 and 39 (p<0.001), 23% vs 5% between 40 and 59 (p<0.001), 26% vs 5% between 60 and 79 (p<0.001) and 25% vs 9% for those older than 80 years (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our nationwide study confirms that infections are the leading cause of death in SLE in Spain, with the highest proportion occurring in young patients with lupus compared with the general population of the same age range.

Clinical Efficacy of Gandakang Tablets plus Methylprednisolone in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

From February 2015 to February 2019, 60 eligible patients with SLE were recruited and assigned via the random number table method at a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive either methylprednisolone (control group) or Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone (observation group). The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy, and the secondary endpoints included Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, immunoglobulin (Ig), inflammatory factor levels, and adverse events.

Results

Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone were associated with a significantly higher treatment efficacy versus methylprednisolone alone (P < 0.05). Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone resulted in significantly lower SLEDAI scores and lower levels of IgG, IgM, IgA, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-4 (IL-4), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) versus single medication of methylprednisolone (P < 0.05). The two groups showed a similar incidence of adverse events (P > 0.05). Patients given Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone had higher mental health, emotional role, physical role, social functioning, and bodily pain scores versus those receiving the monotherapy of methylprednisolone (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone is effective in the treatment of SLE by enhancing the patients' immunity, mitigating the inflammatory response, eliminating negative emotions, and improving their quality of life.

Prednisone and long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: Which is the threshold dose? A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to study the daily dose of glucocorticoids in the first month associated with damage after 5 years of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis; and to assess the daily dose of prednisone during the first year, over which damage after 5 years could be predicted.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cohort study of SLE patients from the diagnosis and up to 5 years of follow-up was performed. Cumulative prednisone doses in the first month (T1m), at 1 year (T12m), and at 5 years (T5y) were calculated. Damage was estimated using the SLICC index and activity by the SLEDAI-2K. Damage at T5y was categorized as "present" or "absent". To determine the cutoff point of prednisone dose for the first month and for the first year of treatment, related to damage at 5 years, a ROC curve was done. A logistic regression was performed to control damage at 5 years by the activity levels, anti-DNA titers, and the corticosteroid burden between 1 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included with a mean age of 42.4 (12.6) years; 46 (95.8%) were female. The cumulative dose in T1m associated with greater sensitivity and specificity in the ROC curve (1.54; AUC 0.793; 95% CI: 0.66-0.92) to predict glucocorticoid-related damage at 5 years of follow-up was 980mg, which leads to a daily dose for the first month of 32.6 mg/day. The daily dose during the first year associated with damage at 5 years, allowed to calculate an optimal cutoff point of 7.38 mg/day, with a sensitivity of 92.9% (AUC 0.695, 95% CI: 0.52-0.86) to predict damage at 5 years. In the logistic regression, this estimate was maintained, controlling for SLEDAI-2K and for positivity or not of anti-DNA antibodies and for the cumulative dose of prednisone between T5y and T12m.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study allows to estimate a threshold dose of 32.6 mg/day during the first month and 7.38 mg/day during the first year, over which the risk of permanent damage is high at 5 years, regardless of the activity levels and the glucocorticoid doses considered between the first and the fifth year of follow-up.

Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Immunosupressors in Lupus Nephritis

Approximately 70% of the patients with systemic lupus erythematosus will have clinical evidence of kidney damage during their evolution. Patients with impaired renal function at onset and those with recurrent flares have a poor prognosis. Understanding the mechanism of action of immunosuppressants is essential for proper prescription. Steroids inhibit the DNA sequence that promotes the release of inflammatory cytokines. Phosphoramide mustard, metabolite of cyclophosphamide, cross-link with the DNA, causing the aggregation of an alkyl group, causing cell death. Mycophenolate inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, prevents de novo synthesis of guanine, inducing cell arrest in S phase. Azathioprine blocks the synthesis of purines and induces apoptosis. Calcineurin inhibitors prevent the dephosphorylation of NFAT and reduce the production of interleukin 2. Antimalarials alter the enzymatic release of lysosomes by increasing intravesicular pH. The mechanism of action of rituximab is related to complement-dependent cytotoxicity and the elimination of anti-CD20-labeled B cells. Progress in the knowledge and management of low doses of steroids may change the current paradigm and reduce the frequency of related adverse events. Mycophenolate seems to be a better choice than cyclophosphamide for induction, it is also preferred over azathioprine as a maintenance immunosuppressive agent, although azathioprine is preferred in women with a desire for conception, those pregnant, or with low resources. For treatment-resistant cases, tacrolimus, rituximab or belimumab may be effective. Ongoing clinical trials with new drugs offer promising results.

The lupus nephritis management renaissance

Over the past year, and for the first time ever, the US Food and Drug Administration approved 2 drugs specifically for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). As the lupus community works toward understanding how to best use these new therapies, it is also an ideal time to begin to rethink the overall management strategy of LN. In addition to new drugs, this must include how to use kidney biopsies for management and not just diagnosis, how molecular technologies can be applied to interrogate biopsies and how such data can impact management, and how to incorporate LN biomarkers into management paradigms. Herein, we will review new developments in these areas of LN and put them into perspective for disease management now and in the future.

Eurolupus cyclophosphamide plus repeated pulses of methyl-prednisolone for the induction therapy of class III, IV and V lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To study whether adding repeated 125 mg methyl-prednisolone pulses (MP) to Eurolupus fortnightly intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) improves remission of lupus nephritis (LN) compared with recommended schedules.

METHODS

Observational comparative study of patients with biopsy-confirmed class III, IV or V LN: 30 in the mycophenolate (MMF) group, 25 in the CYC group and 38 in the CYC-MP group. The main efficacy outcome was complete response at 12 months.

RESULTS

Patients in the CYC-MP group received lower doses of prednisone within 6 months (mean 8.5 mg/d, vs. 15 mg/d in the MMF group vs. 24 mg/d in the CYC group, respectively). The complete response rates at 12 months were: CYC-MP 86%; CYC 56%; MMF 47% (p = 0.002) at Pr/Cr <0.5; CYC-MP 86%; CYC 65%; MMF 63% (p = 0.07) at Pr/Cr ≤0.7. The cumulative 12-month response rates for the CYC-MP, CYC and MMF groups were, respectively, 0.90, 0.58 and 0.63 (p = 0.004). In the adjusted Cox model, patients receiving CYC-MP were more likely to achieve complete response at Pr/Cr <0.5 than those in the MMF (HR vs. CYC-MP 0.33, 95%CI 0.16-0.65) and the CYC groups (HR vs. CYC-MP 0.47, 95%CI 0.21-1.04). Glucocorticoid-related toxicity was seen in 2.6% of the CYC-MP group, 24% of the CYC group and 20% of the MMF group (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

The addition MP of 125 mg to each fortnightly dose of 500 mg of CYC improves response rates and reduces the need for oral glucocorticoids in patients with class III, IV and V LN.

Treating systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century: new drugs and new perspectives on old drugs

Besides treating acute flares, the management of SLE should aim at preventing organ damage accrual and drug-associated harms, improving health-related quality of life and prolonging survival. At present, therapy is based on combinations of antimalarials (mainly HCQ), considered the backbone of SLE treatment, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, these regimens are not universally effective and a substantial degree of damage can be caused by exposure to glucocorticoids. In this review we provide a critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety of available treatments as well as a brief discussion of potentially novel compounds in patients with SLE. We emphasize the use of methylprednisolone pulses for moderate–severe flares, followed by low–moderate doses of oral prednisone with quick tapering to maintenance doses of ≤5 mg/day, as well as the prompt institution of immunosuppressive drugs in the setting of severe disease but also as steroid-sparing agents. Indications for the use of biologic agents, namely belimumab and rituximab, in refractory or organ-threatening disease are also presented. We conclude by proposing evidence- and experience-based treatment strategies tailored to the clinical scenario and prevailing organ involvement that can aid clinicians in managing this complex disease.

Second week methyl-prednisolone pulses improve prognosis in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: An observational comparative study using routine care data

Objective

To analyze the effects of a short course of methyl-prednisolone pulses (MP) during the second week of disease (week-2) in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.

Methods

Comparative observational study using data collected from routine care at Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We compared patients who received week-2-MP (125–250 mg/d x3) with those who did not, with the end-points time to death and time to death or endotracheal intubation.

Results

We included 242 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated inflammatory markers at admission. Sixty-one patients (25%) received week-2-MP. Twenty-two patients (9%) died and 31 (12.8%) suffered death or intubation. The adjusted HRs for death and death or intubation for patients in the week-2-MP group were 0.35 (95%CI 0.11 to 1.06, p = 0.064) and 0.33 (95%CI 0.13 to 0.84, p = 0.020), respectively. These differences were specifically seen in the subcohort of patients with a SpO2/FiO2 at day 7 lower than 353 (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.12, p = 0.073 and HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.94, p = 0.038, respectively) but not in patients with higher SpO2/FiO2. Patients receiving out-of-week-2-MP, non-pulse glucocorticoids or no glucocorticoids had an increased adjusted risk for both outcomes compared with week-2-MP group: HR 5.04 (95% CI 0.91–27.86), HR 10.09 (95% CI 2.14–47.50), HR 4.14 (95% CI 0.81–21.23), respectively, for death; HR 7.38 (95% CI 1.86–29.29), HR 13.71 (95% CI 3.76–50.07), HR 3.58 (95% CI 0.89–14.32), respectively, for death or intubation. These differences were significant only in the subgroup with low SpO2/FiO2.

Conclusions

Week-2-MP are effective in improving the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with features of inflammatory activity and respiratory deterioration entering the second week of disease. The recognition of this high-risk population should prompt early use of MP at this point.

Glucocorticoids in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ten Questions and Some Issues

Since the discovery of glucocorticoids (GCs), their important anti-inflammatory effect, rapid mechanism of action, low cost, and accessibility have made them one of the mainstays of treatment for Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although their use has allowed controlling the disease and reducing acute mortality in severe conditions, the implementation of a scheme based on high doses for long periods has inevitably been accompanied by an increase in adverse effects and infections, including long-term damage. The objective of this review is to answer some important questions that may arise from its use in daily clinical practice, and to propose a paradigm based on the use of methylprednisolone pulses followed by medium-low doses and a rapid decrease of prednisone.