Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: What is the supporting evidence so far?

While acknowledging that newer therapies have improved survival rates in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), patients with high-risk disease features are at an increased risk of treatment failure. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was traditionally offered as front-line consolidation in high-risk CLL; however, with the emergence of targeted therapies like Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors, the role of allo-HCT has been relegated to later stages of the disease. Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL who have failed both BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors represent a therapeutic challenge owing to a poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies targeting CD19 have improved response rates and overall survival in various types of R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. For CLL, no approved CAR T-cell therapies are yet available. Emerging data appear to show a therapeutic benefit of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R CLL, even after failing an allo-HCT.

Driving Out Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With CAR T Cells

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent leukemia in the Western hemisphere. The recent availability of novel targeted therapies, namely Bruton's tyrosine kinase, phosphoinositide-3 kinase, and BCL-2 inhibitors, have revolutionized the treatment algorithm for CLL but have not yet resulted in cure. Advances in the field of immuno-oncology and T cell engineering brought chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy from the laboratory to the clinic for treatment of B cell lymphoid malignancies and has improved the disease response and survival outcomes of various types of relapsed and/or refractory B cell lymphomas. While acknowledging that there are no approved CAR T cell therapies for CLL at this time, in this comprehensive review we explore novel targets for CAR T cell therapy in CLL and highlight the promising results of CAR T cell trials reported to date. Furthermore, we shed light on future areas of development, including multitarget CAR T cell products for this disease.

Reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter's transformation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may potentially cure patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter's transformation (CLL-RT) or CLL without RT, but the impact of novel agents on HSCT is unclear. CLL-RT patients have a grave prognosis, and their outcomes after HSCT are uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all 58 CLL patients, including 23 CLL-RT patients, who underwent reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) between September 2006 and April 2017. With a median follow-up of 68 months (range, 24-147 months), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28%-56%), and overall survival (OS) was 58% (95% CI, 48%-74%). The 1-year graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 38% (95% CI, 25%-50%). Patients with CLL-RT and CLL patients without RT had comparable outcomes. In both cohorts, treatment-sensitive response and ≤3 previous lines of therapy produced superior PFS and OS. Outcomes were agnostic to adverse cytogenetic and molecular features. Novel agents did not have a negative impact on HSCT outcomes. Total body irradiation (TBI)-containing RIC yielded inferior PFS, OS, and GRFS. CLL-RT patients older than age 55 years who had an HSCT Comorbidity Index score of ≥2 demonstrated inferior OS. This study, which is the largest series of RIC-HSCT for patients with CLL-RT, provides evidence supporting RIC-HSCT in early remission courses for patients with CLL-RT and poor-risk CLL patients. TBI-containing RIC should be considered with caution.

Treatment of Del17p and/or aberrant TP53 chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel therapies

More effective therapies are emerging, with better toxicity profiles, and are being incorporated into modern treatment algorithms of chronic lymphocytic leukemia at various stages of the disease, including for patients harboring Del17p and/or aberrant TP53. Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, has demonstrated impressive response rates in the relapsed/refractory setting, including in the setting of Del17p and/or TP53 mutations. Venetoclax, an inhibitor of BCL-2 known to play an important role in regulating cell death, has been approved recently for treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with Del17p who have received at least one prior therapy. Unfortunately, a cure remains unattainable unless eligible patients are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. However, hematopoietic cell allografting is limited by the availability of suitable donors and significant morbidity and mortality. Recent clinical practice recommendations by the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation have relegated the role of transplantation to later stages of the disease. In patients with evidence of Richter syndrome, frontline consolidation allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the most desirable approach owing to the limited activity of ibrutinib or other novel therapies. Further therapeutic advances would require enrolling these patients in large clinical trials that evaluate novel therapies alone or in combination with traditional chemotherapies or even in the setting of posttransplant consolidation/maintenance.

Sequencing of chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapies

It is an unprecedented time for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with the recent approval of several targeted agents for use in frontline, relapsed, refractory, and high-risk disease. Traditionally, frontline management of CLL has been a combination of chemotherapy (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, or chlorambucil) with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab). The current landscape is rapidly evolving with the advent of therapies that demonstrate selective inhibition of important pathways necessary for CLL proliferation and survival. Despite considerable progress, much is still unknown and optimal treatment selection and sequence is still debatable. None of the new agents have been compared against each other and the impact of adding an additional agent to monotherapy is not yet fully elucidated. In routine clinical practice, the choice of therapy is based on nonrandomized comparisons, presence of comorbidities, and toxicity considerations. These recently approved drugs (ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax) are reporting excellent outcomes, including patients with high-risk disease such as 17p deletion (17p-) or TP53 mutations (TP53mut). Ibrutinib and venetoclax have been approved for use in 17p- patients (frontline and relapsed, respectively). Ibrutinib is currently moving into the frontline space given recent regulatory approvals. This review will summarize and interpret the limited therapeutic sequencing data available, highlighting the need for additional studies to optimize combination strategies and treatments after failure or discontinuation of these novel agents.

Clinical Practice Recommendations for Use of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia on Behalf of the Guidelines Committee of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

We sought to establish clinical practice recommendations to redefine the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in an era of highly active targeted therapies. We performed a systematic review to identify prospective randomized controlled trials comparing allo-HCT against novel therapies for treatment of CLL at various disease stages. In the absence of such data, we invited physicians with expertise in allo-HCT and/or CLL to participate in developing these recommendations. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. For standard-risk CLL we recommend allo-HCT in the absence of response or if there is evidence of disease progression after B cell receptor (BCR) inhibitors. For high-risk CLL an allo-HCT is recommended after failing 2 lines of therapy and showing an objective response to BCR inhibitors or to a clinical trial. It is also recommended for patients who fail to show an objective response or progress after BCR inhibitors and receive BCL-2 inhibitors, regardless of whether an objective response is achieved. For Richter transformation, we recommend allo-HCT upon demonstration of an objective response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. A reduced-intensity conditioning regimen is recommended whenever indicated. These recommendations highlight the rapidly changing treatment landscape of CLL. Newer therapies have disrupted prior paradigms, and allo-HCT is now relegated to later stages of relapsed or refractory CLL.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Richter Syndrome

Treatment combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy as well as novel targeted therapies have shown limited efficacy in Richter syndrome. Overall response rates after chemoimmunotherapy range from 43% to 67%, but remissions are generally short-lived. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (all-HCT) is considered a potentially curative treatment modality, yielding 3-year overall survival rates exceeding 50% and a plateau in survival curves. In Richter syndrome, efficacy of allo-HCT depends on demonstrating an objective response (complete remission or partial response) before allografting, with resulting 3-year survival rates of 41% to 75%. On the other hand, the efficacy of autologous HCT is limited, especially when considering that patients autografted for Richter syndrome might relapse with CLL in 35% of cases. Notwithstanding the scarcity of published data, we recommend that patients with Richter syndrome should be referred to transplant centers as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed to evaluate their candidacy for allo-HCT. Establishing a clonal relationship to CLL is important considering the more aggressive disease course in clonally related Richter syndrome. Moreover, achievement of a complete remission or partial response to salvage therapy must be a prerequisite before moving forward with allografting for Richter syndrome. Patients who fail to demonstrate an objective response to salvage therapy should be considered for enrollment in clinical trials.

An update on current and prospective immunotherapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia. Combined agent chemotherapy is the current standard front-line treatment for physically fit patients with CLL. Use of chemotherapy can be complicated by significant toxicity, especially in patients with advanced age or comorbid conditions. Moreover, patients may relapse and become refractory to further chemotherapy. Immunotherapy targets the aberrant immunological processes in CLL without the toxicity of chemotherapy. Immunotherapeutic strategies can also be combined with chemotherapy to improve response rates in this incurable disease. In this review, we evaluate current and future immune-based options in the treatment of CLL.

Progress in novel cellular therapy options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the M D Anderson perspective

Over the past several years there has been considerable progress in the number and breadth of therapeutic options for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In particular, cumulative experience with stem cell transplant and immunotherapy has made these modalities more available to a broader range of patients. Advances in genetic engineering and ex vivo expansion techniques have sculpted cellular therapy products to optimize the combination of specificity and toxicity. This brief review discusses recent cutting-edge experience with chimeric antigen receptor T cells as well as developing cellular therapy products at the authors' institution.

Predictors of outcome in reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: summarizing the evidence and highlighting the limitations

Several studies have reported the prognostic significance of various clinical, genetic, biologic and molecular markers on postallogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes such as nonrelapse mortality, relapse and survival. Notwithstanding limitations, existence of refractory/progressive disease at allografting yields worse nonrelapse mortality, more relapse and inferior overall survival. Advanced age results in higher nonrelapse mortality and increased relapse risk. Presence of poor-risk cytogenetics increases post-transplant relapse risk, but its impact on overall survival appears controversial. Developing prognostic models using large multicenter data could help better understand the effect of these and other variables on post-transplant outcomes. Newly discovered mutations as well as response (or not) to new potent therapies, such as ibrutinib or others, would likely be incorporated in such models.

Vaccine therapy for cytomegalovirus in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Passive immunization against CMV is desirable to minimize or perhaps eliminate complications related to CMV disease. In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the major challenge facing a successful anti-CMV vaccine is inducing immunity in an immunocompromised host. To date, only one CMV vaccine, ASP0113, has been evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II study. ASP0113 is a bivalent product containing two plasmids that encode CMV glycoprotein B and tegument phosphoprotein 65, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in rate of initiation of anti-CMV therapy, rates of CMV viremia were lower in the ASP0113 group when measured by a central laboratory. Also, time-to-first episode of viremia was longer in subjects receiving ASP0113. These findings paved the way for an ongoing placebo-controlled Phase III study aiming at enrolling 500 subjects. Results of this Phase III trial, especially if it meets clinically meaningful endpoints, will ultimately determine the role of anti-CMV vaccine strategies in allo-HCT.

Paradigm shifts in the management of poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia

With the growing complexity of treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and variables that influence the underlying biology of this disease, providing allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) to appropriate candidates poses a challenge for transplant physicians. Novel small molecule inhibitors hold unprecedented promise for poor-risk subgroups, which will likely alter decision-making and referral patterns for transplant. In this review, we analyze what is known and may still remain true about indications for transplant based on outcomes reported in the literature recently and over the last decade.

Role of allogeneic transplantation in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel therapies: a review

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of adult leukemia and is characterized by a highly variable clinical course. In the past decade, several prognostic risk factors have been identified facilitating the classification of CLL into various risk groups. Patients with poor risk disease, such as poor cytogenetics or relapsing after purine-based analogues, had limited therapeutic options, with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-SCT) the only known therapy with curative potential. More recently, the introduction of novel agents inhibiting the B-cell receptor pathway, and the early success with chimeric antigen receptor T cells offers an effective and relatively safe option for this poor prognostic group which holds promise in the future. Alternatively, the use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens in the allo-SCT setting has led to a significant decrease in nonrelapse mortality to 16-23%, making it an attractive therapeutic option. No recent guidelines have been developed since these novel therapies became available regarding the optimal time to allo-SCT in this patient population. The advent of these novel and highly active therapeutic agents, therefore, warrants a reappraisal of the role and timing of allo-SCT in patients with CLL. In this article, we summarize the literature regarding the novel therapeutic agents available today as well as focus on the efficacy and safety of allo-SCT.

Comparing i.v. BU dose intensity between two regimens (FB2 vs FB4) for allogeneic HCT for AML in CR1: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT

This retrospective analysis compared two regimens of fludarabine combined with i.v. BU 6.4 mg/kg (FB2) or BU 12.8 mg/kg (FB4) for allografting of AML in first CR. A total of 437 patients (median age: 50 years) were administered FB2 (n = 225, 51%) or FB4 (n = 212, 49%). Median follow-up time was 28 months. Use of FB2 resulted in a longer time to neutrophil engraftment (17 vs 15 days, P < 0.0001) but no difference in incidence of grade II-IV acute (P = 0.54) or chronic GVHD (P = 0.51). In patients < 50 years of age, FB2 was associated with a higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (33 ± 6% vs 20 ± 4%, P = 0.04), but there was no difference in 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) (P = 0.45), OS (P = 0.53) or non-relapse mortality (P = 0.17). In recipients ⩾ 50 years of age, FB2 resulted in better 2-year LFS (63 ± 4% vs 42 ± 7%, P = 0.02) and OS (68 ± 4% vs 45 ± 7%, P = 0.006); a lower 2-year non-relapse mortality, albeit not statistically significant (15 ± 3% vs 29 ± 6%, P = 0.06), was observed with FB2. FB2 is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients ⩾ 50 years of age and does not compromise survival when used in patients <50 years undergoing allogeneic transplantation for AML in first CR.

Genomic aberrations deletion 11q and deletion 17p independently predict for worse progression-free and overall survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia remains incurable despite availability of potent chemoimmunotherapy regimens. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only modality that offers the possibility of cure. To identify predictors of progression-free and overall survival, we evaluated outcomes of 43 consecutive patients who received an allograft for advanced CLL. The majority received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (n=37). Donors were HLA matched-related (n=18), matched-unrelated (n=15), mismatched-unrelated (n=7), or umbilical cord blood (n=3). The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 31.4 months and 46.4 months respectively. Twenty (46.5%) patients were alive and in complete remission at a median follow-up of 31.4 months. NRM was higher than previously published series for CLL, likely due to a high burden of comorbidity (22 patients with HCT-CI ≥ 2) and a high proportion receiving HLA mismatched-unrelated donor or umbilical cord blood cells. Presence of del (11q), del(17p), or progressive disease at HCT are independent predictors of worse PFS and OS. New strategies are needed to improve survival outcomes in CLL associated with poor risk cytogenetics.

Immunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of BTK inhibitors

Understanding the pathogenesis of CLL has uncovered a plethora of novel targets for human application of monoclonal antibodies, engineered T cells, or inhibitors of signal transduction pathways. The B-cell receptor signaling pathway is being actively explored as a therapeutic target in CLL. Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase is showing impressive responses in heavily pre-treated high-risk CLL, whether alone or in combination with MoAbs or chemotherapy. Other key components of the BCR pathway, namely PI3K-δ, are also being targeted with novel therapies with promising results as well. Future trials would likely evaluate ibrutinib in the front-line setting. Moreover, improvements in allogeneic HCT mostly by continuing to reduce associated toxicity as well as incorporating cellular therapies such as autologous CLL tumor vaccines, among others, will continue to expand. This is also the case for the next generation of chimeric antigen receptor therapy for CLL once genetically modified T cells are available at broad scale and with improved efficacy. As our ability to further refine and integrate these therapies continues to improve, and we gain further knowledge from gene sequencing, we anticipate that treatment algorithms will continue to be revised to a more personalized approach to treat this disease with improved efficacy and devoid of unnecessary toxicity.

Managing Hodgkin lymphoma relapsing after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: a not-so-good cancer after all!

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapsing after an autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) poses a therapeutic challenge. In this setting, salvage chemotherapy (for example, gemcitabine-based, ifosfamide-containing and others) or immunotherapy (for example, brentuximab vedotin) is essential as a bridging-cytoreduction strategy to an allogeneic HCT. Myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in relapsed HL is associated with high rates of non-relapse mortality. In carefully selected patients with chemosensitive disease, allografting following lower-intensity conditioning regimens can provide durable disease control rates of about 25-35%. Promising early results with haploidentical and umbilical cord transplantation are noteworthy and are expanding this procedure to patients for whom HLA-matched related or unrelated donors are not available. Unfortunately, a significant number of HL patients relapsing after an autologous HCT are not candidates for allografting because of the presence of resistant disease, donor unavailability or comorbidities. Brentuximab vedotin is approved for HL relapsing after a prior autograft. Rituximab and bendamustine are also active in this setting, albeit with short durations of remission. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (for example, panobinostat, mocetinostat), mTOR inhibitors (for example, everolimus) and immunomodulatory agents (lenalidomide) have shown activity in phase II trials, but currently are not approved for this indication. Second autologous HCT are rarely performed but this approach should not be considered standard practice at this time. The need for effective agents for post autograft failures of HL largely remains unmet. Continuous efforts to ensure early referral of such patients for allogeneic HCT or investigational therapies are the key to improving outcomes of this not-so-good lymphoma.

Chronic leukemia

The chronic leukemias include chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). CML is a clonal myeloproliferative hematopoietic stem-cell disorder, and CLL is a monoclonal B-cell disorder. CML is Philadelphia chromosome positive. There are 3 phases of CML: the chronic phase, the accelerated phase, and the blast phase. The primary treatment of CML consists of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. CLL can present as indolent or fulminant disease. Early disease is managed with observation. Fulminant disease is currently treated with alkylating agents, purine analogues, and monoclonal antibodies, but new biotarged therapies are being developed.

Low tumor burden is associated with early B-cell reconstitution and is a predictor of favorable outcome after non-myeloablative stem cell transplant for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract Reconstitution, engraftment kinetics and tumor cell clearance were analyzed after reduced intensity conditioning hematopoietic cell transplant (RIC-HCT) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients were transplanted from unrelated (n = 40) or related (n = 10) donors after fludarabine and 2 Gy total body irradiation followed by cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The vast majority of patients (96%) engrafted with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 × 10(9)/L at day + 22. CLL cells decreased (median 2%, range 0-69%) within 28 days, but disappeared by day + 180 after HCT. Donor T-cell chimerism increased to > 95% at day 56 and donor B-cell chimerism to 94% at day + 360. Overall survival was 51 ± 8%, incidence of progression 37 ± 7% and non-relapse related mortality (NRM) 30 ± 7% at 4 years. The most common causes of NRM were graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (14%) and sepsis (6%). Disease status at HCT was significantly associated with early B-cell reconstitution (p = 0.04) and with increased risk of relapse/progression in univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.022). Tumor cells were undetectable by day + 180, although B-cell reconstitution did not occur until 1.5 years after RIC-HCT. The best predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were complete response (CR) or first partial response (PR1) and the absence of bulky disease at transplant, respectively.

Phase II study of CD4+-guided pentostatin lymphodepletion and pharmacokinetically targeted busulfan as conditioning for hematopoietic cell allografting

One limitation of reduced-intensity preparative regimens is potential for graft failure. We have developed a regimen that targets CD4(+) lymphodepletion to ensure early and durable engraftment. The primary endpoint was achievement of ≥50% CD3(+) donor chimerism by day +28. Forty-two patients (median age, 53 years; range, 29 to 73 years) received pentostatin 4 mg/m(2) i.v. on days -28, -21, and -14 when the CD4(+) cell count was >100 cells/μL and on days -4 and -3 regardless of CD4(+) level. Rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was administered to patients with CD20(+) malignancies on days -21, -14, -7, +1, and +8. Busulfan 200 mg/m(2) i.v. was administered on days -4 and -2 at a dose to target a cumulative AUC dose of 16,000 (±10%) μmol·min/L. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus plus methotrexate in 86% of patients. Donors were matched-related (47%), matched unrelated (43%), or mismatched unrelated (10%). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (45%) and follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14%) were the most common diagnoses. Disease status at initiation of the preparative regimen was complete remission in 22%, partial response in 55%, and stable/progression in 24%. The median percent CD4(+) cell count decrease from baseline (day -28) was 52% to day -21, 66% to day -14, 62% to day -7, and 91% to day 0. At day +28, all 42 patients (100%) had ≥50% CD3(+) donor chimerism. No patient experienced graft failure. Overall response rate was 82% (complete remisson, 67%). The day +100 cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 59% (grade III-IV acute GVHD, 19%), and the 2 year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 69% (moderate/severe, 58%). Nonrelapse mortality was 2% at day +100 and 17% at 2 years. Two-year PFS was 55%, and OS was 68%. This regimen ensures durable engraftment, is effective against persistent disease, and results in relatively low mortality from causes other than relapse.

[Conventional therapeutic strategies for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia]

The choice of salvage therapy for patients presenting relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has to take into account some factors influencing tumor resistance and comorbidities. Since 2010, new drugs targeting the tumor cells' signaling have been proposed for CLL patients. Waiting the results of various clinical trials evaluating these treatments, there is a need to describe the state-of-the-art concerning approved treatments such as chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies.

Therapeutic advancement of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Despite the combinations of chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies have further improved response rates, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains an incurable disease with an extremely variable course. This article reviews the ongoing clinical advances in the treatment of CLL in both previously untreated and relapsed disease and focuses on the benefit of different therapeutic strategies, the most effective therapy combinations and the potential activity of novel agents. Novel agents and combination therapies have been investigated by several studies in both the upfront and relapsed setting, particularly for patients with 17p deletion, TP53 mutation and fludarabine-refractory CLL. While these agents and combination therapies have improved initial response rates, ongoing studies are continued to determine and improve the efficacy and safety. Despite advancements in the treatment of CLL have led to high response rates, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative option and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT must be strongly considered whenever feasible. As such, ongoing studies of these agents and other novel approaches in clinical development are needed to expand and improve treatment options for CLL patients.