2
|
Gennaro N, Reijers S, Bruining A, Messiou C, Haas R, Colombo P, Bodalal Z, Beets-Tan R, van Houdt W, van der Graaf WTA. Imaging response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas: Where do we stand? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 160:103309. [PMID: 33757836 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Gennaro
- Humanitas Research and Cancer Center, Dept. of Radiology, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sophie Reijers
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christina Messiou
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Dept. Of Radiology Sarcoma Unit, Sutton, United Kingdom; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Rick Haas
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | | | - Zuhir Bodalal
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle University Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Winan van Houdt
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baidya Kayal E, Kandasamy D, Yadav R, Bakhshi S, Sharma R, Mehndiratta A. Automatic segmentation and RECIST score evaluation in osteosarcoma using diffusion MRI: A computer aided system process. Eur J Radiol 2020; 133:109359. [PMID: 33129104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accuracy and consistency in RECIST (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) measurements are crucial for treatment planning. Manual RECIST measurement is tedious, prone-to-error and operator-subjective. Objective was to develop a fully automated system for tumor segmentation and RECIST score estimation with reasonable accuracy, consistency and speed. METHODS Diffusion weight images (DWI) of forty patients (N = 40; Male:Female = 30:10; Age = 17.7 ± 5.9years) with Osteosarcoma was acquired using 1.5 T MRI scanner before (baseline) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (follow-up). 3D tumor volume was segmented applying Simple-linear-iterative-clustering Superpixels (SLIC-S) and Fuzzy-c-means-clustering (FCM) separately. Connected-component-analysis was performed to identify image-slice with maximum tumor-burden (Max-burden-sliceno) and measure tumor-sizes (Tumor-diameter(cm) & Tumor-volume(cc)). Relative-percentage-changes in tumor-sizes across time-points were scored using RECIST1.1 and Volumetric-response criterion. Segmentation accuracy was estimated by Dice-coefficient (DC), Jaccard-Index (JI), Precision (P) and Recall (R). Evaluated Apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ADC), Tumor-diameter, Max-burden-sliceno and Tumor-volume in segmented tumor-mask and ground-truth tumor-mask were compared using paired-t-test (p < 0.05), Pearson-correlation-coefficient(PCC) and Bland-Altman plots. Misclassification-error-rate (MER) was evaluated for automated RECIST1.1 and Volumetric-response scoring methods. RESULTS Automated SLIC-S and FCM produced satisfactory tumor segmentation (DC:∼70-83%;JI:∼55-72%;P:∼64-85%;R:∼73-83%) and showed excellent correlation with ground-truth measurements in estimating ADC (p > 0.05; PCC=0.84-0.89), Tumor-diameters (p > 0.05; PCC=0.90-0.95; bias=0.3-2.41), Max-burden-sliceno (p > 0.05; PCC=0.87-0.96) and Tumor-volumes (p > 0.05; PCC=0.89-0.94; bias=15.19-131.81) at baseline and follow-up. MER for SLIC-S and FCM were comparable for RECIST1.1 (15-18 %) and Volumetric-response (18-20 %) scores and assessment times were 2-3s and 4-6s per patient respectively. CONCLUSIONS Proposed method produced promising segmentation and RECIST score measurements in current bone tumor dataset and might be useful as decision-support-tool for response evaluation in other tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esha Baidya Kayal
- Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Richa Yadav
- Department of Radio Diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute-Rotary Cancer Hospital (IRCH), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Raju Sharma
- Department of Radio Diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amit Mehndiratta
- Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India; Department of Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahlawat S, Fritz J, Morris CD, Fayad LM. Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors: Review of conventional features and focus on nonmorphologic imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:11-27. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Carol D. Morris
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Laura M. Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Department of OncologyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vallières M, Serban M, Benzyane I, Ahmed Z, Xing S, El Naqa I, Levesque IR, Seuntjens J, Freeman CR. Investigating the role of functional imaging in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 6:53-60. [PMID: 33458389 PMCID: PMC7807871 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose In this work, we validate a texture-based model computed from positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). We explore functional imaging at different treatment time points and evaluate the feasibility of radiotherapy dose painting as a potential treatment strategy for patients with higher metastatic risk. Materials and methods We acquired fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-PET, diffusion weighting (DW)-MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI data for 18 patients with extremity STS before, during, and after pre-operative radiotherapy. We tested the lung metastases prediction model using pre-treatment images. We evaluated the feasibility of dose painting using volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) via treatment re-planning with a prescription of 50 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV50Gy) and boost doses of 60 Gy to the FDG hypermetabolic gross tumour volume (GTV60Gy) and 65 Gy to the low-perfusion DCE-MRI hypoxic GTV contained within the GTV60Gy (GTV65Gy). Results The texture-based model for lung metastases prediction reached an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.71, 0.75, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. Dose painting resulted in adequate coverage and homogeneity in the re-planned treatments: D95% to the PTV50Gy, GTV60Gy and GTV65Gy were 50.0 Gy, 60.3 Gy and 65.4 Gy, respectively. Conclusions Textural biomarkers extracted from FDG-PET and MRI could be useful to identify STS patients that might benefit from dose escalation. The feasibility of treatment planning with double boost levels to intratumoural GTV functional sub-volumes was established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Vallières
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Corresponding author.
| | - Monica Serban
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Ibtissam Benzyane
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Zaki Ahmed
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Shu Xing
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, University of Michigan, 519 W. Williman St. Argus Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943, USA
| | - Ives R. Levesque
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Carolyn R. Freeman
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre – Glen Site, 1001 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|