Proposal and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Modification of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Diagnostic Criteria for Sepsis

BACKGROUND

 Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) criteria were launched nearly 20 years ago. Following the revised conceptual definition of sepsis and subsequent omission of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score from the latest sepsis diagnostic criteria, we omitted the SIRS score and proposed a modified version of JAAM DIC criteria, the JAAM-2 DIC criteria.

OBJECTIVES

 To validate and compare performance between new JAAM-2 DIC criteria and conventional JAAM DIC criteria for sepsis.

METHODS

 We used three datasets containing adult sepsis patients from a multicenter nationwide Japanese cohort study (J-septic DIC, FORECAST, and SPICE-ICU registries). JAAM-2 DIC criteria omitted the SIRS score and set the cutoff value at ≥3 points. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed between the two DIC criteria to evaluate prognostic value. Associations between in-hospital mortality and anticoagulant therapy according to DIC status were analyzed using propensity score weighting to compare significance of the criteria in determining introduction of anticoagulants against sepsis.

RESULTS

 Final study cohorts of the datasets included 2,154, 1,065, and 608 sepsis patients, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that curves for both JAAM and JAAM-2 DIC criteria as predictors of in-hospital mortality were almost consistent. Survival curves for the anticoagulant and control groups in the propensity score-weighted prediction model diagnosed using the two criteria were also almost entirely consistent.

CONCLUSION

 JAAM-2 DIC criteria were equivalent to JAAM DIC criteria regarding prognostic and diagnostic values for initiating anticoagulation. The newly proposed JAAM-2 DIC criteria could be potentially alternative criteria for sepsis management.

Efficacy of unfractionated heparin in patients with moderate sepsis-induced coagulopathy: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in sepsis. However, observational studies suggest that anticoagulants as a whole may benefit severely ill sepsis patients with coagulopathy, but the optimal targets of unfractionated heparin remain unclear. This study investigated which sepsis patients could most benefit from unfractionated heparin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we identified adult sepsis patients requiring urgent hospitalization from 2006 to 2019 using a large-scale Japanese medical database. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving unfractionated heparin within 72 h of admission and those who did not. We compared in-hospital mortality, major bleeding complications, and thromboembolic events between these groups using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for patient and treatment variables. Additionally, we assessed the association between heparin administration and in-hospital mortality across various subgroups.

RESULTS

Among 30,342 sepsis patients, 2520 received early heparin administration, and 27,822 did not. Multivariate logistic regression revealed a significant association between heparin and reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 0.735, 95 % CI: 0.596-0.903) but no significant association with major bleeding and thromboembolic risk (adjusted OR: 1.137, 1.243; 95 % CI: 0.926-1.391, 0.853-1.788, respectively). Subgroup analyses suggested significant survival benefits associated with heparin only in the sepsis patients with moderate coagulopathy and sepsis-induced coagulopathy scores of 3 or 4 (adjusted OR: 0.452, 0.625; 95 % CI: 0.265-0.751, 0.410-0.940, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Early heparin administration upon admission is associated with lower in-hospital mortality, especially in moderate sepsis-induced coagulopathy, and no significant increase in complications.

Prognostic Impact of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Score in Sepsis: A Systematic Review

The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are widely used for DIC diagnosis. However, the prognostic value of the score may vary between different patient populations and settings. This systematic review investigated the association between the ISTH DIC score and mortality in sepsis patients. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase. Inclusion criteria were studies including adult and pediatric patients hospitalized with sepsis, using any sepsis definition, and investigating the association between mortality and the ISTH DIC score. The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. In total, 42 studies were included. A positive association between the ISTH DIC score and mortality was consistently reported, with odds ratios of death in DIC versus non-DIC patients ranging from 1.125 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.838-1.511) to 21.008 (95% CI: 1.408-313.405) in adults and from 1.378 (95% CI: 1.004-1.893) to 2.99 (95% CI: 0.54-16.6) in pediatric populations. However, the DIC score only had a low-moderate positive predictive value for mortality, as area under receiver-operator characteristics ranged from 0.602 (95% CI: 0.575-0.630) to 0.815 (95% CI: 0.676-0.954) in adults. Of note, only few studies adjusted for potential confounders such as age, gender, and comorbidity. The ISTH DIC score is consistently associated with sepsis-related mortality but is not a strong positive predictor for mortality. Nevertheless, the score may still have a prognostic value and its use in sepsis is encouraged.

The prognostic utility of protein C as a biomarker for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Sepsis, the dysregulated host response to infection, triggers abnormal pro-coagulant and pro-inflammatory host responses. Limitations in early disease intervention highlight the need for effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Protein C’s role as an anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory molecule makes it an appealing target for sepsis biomarker studies. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of protein C (PC) as a biomarker for adult sepsis.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library from database inception to September 12, 2021. We included prospective observational studies of (1) adult patients (> 17) with sepsis or suspicion of sepsis that; (2) measured PC levels with 24 h of study admission with; and (3) the goal of examining PC as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker. Two authors screened articles and conducted risk of bias (RoB) assessment, using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) and the Quality Assessment in Diagnostic Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tools. If sufficient data were available, meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between patient populations.

Results

Twelve studies were included, and 8 were synthesized for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis demonstrated moderate certainty of evidence that PC levels were less reduced in sepsis survivors compared to non-survivors (6 studies, 741 patients, SMD = 0.52, 95% CI 0.24–0.81, p = 0.0003, I² = 55%), and low certainty of evidence that PC levels were less reduced in septic patients without disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) compared to those with DIC (3 studies, 644 patients, SMD = 0.97, 95% CI 0.62–1.32, p < 0.00001, I² = 67%). PC could not be evaluated as a diagnostic tool due to heterogeneous control populations between studies.

Conclusion and relevance

Our review demonstrates that PC levels were significantly higher in sepsis survivors compared to non-survivors and patients with sepsis but not disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Our evaluation is limited by high RoB in included studies and poor reporting of the sensitivity and specificity of PC as a sepsis biomarker. Future studies are needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PC to identify its clinical significance as a biomarker for early sepsis recognition.

Trial Registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021229786. The study protocol was published in BMJ Open.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-03889-2.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation: epidemiology, biomarkers, and management

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a systemic activation of the coagulation system, which results in microvascular thrombosis and, simultaneously, potentially life-threatening haemorrhage attributed to consumption of platelets and coagulation factors. Underlying conditions, e.g. infection, cancer, or obstetrical complications are responsible for the initiation and propagation of the DIC process. This review provides insights into the epidemiology of DIC and the current understanding of its pathophysiology. It details the use of diagnostic biomarkers, current diagnostic recommendations from international medical societies, and it provides an overview of emerging diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Last, it provides guidance on management. It is concluded that timely and accurate diagnosis of DIC and its underlying condition is essential for the prognosis. Treatment should primarily focus on the underlying cause of DIC and supportive treatment should be individualised according to the underlying aetiology, patient's symptoms and laboratory records.

A multicenter, prospective evaluation of the Chinese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scoring System for disseminated intravascular coagulation

INTRODUCTION

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a severe complication of critical conditions. There are several scoring systems used for the diagnosis of DIC, including the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) Overt-DIC criteria, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) criteria and the Chinese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis scoring system for DIC (CDSS). The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy and predictive value of the CDSS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1318 patients, aged 18-70 years old and suspected of DIC were enrolled from 18 hospitals across China. Participants were divided into two groups for analysis (group 1, non-hematological diseases; group 2, hematological diseases). 242 patients were excluded because of incomplete data collection and failure to follow-up.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The rates of concordance of diagnosis of DIC between the CDSS and two other scoring systems were close to 80%. The area under ROC curves of CDSS had a slight advantage when using the ISTH, JMHW criteria or prognosis as gold standard, respectively. The CDSS DIC was an independent predictor of mortality, and its odds-ratio was superior or comparable to that of the ISTH and JMHW criteria in the two groups. The CDSS DIC score also had a significant correlation with the APACHE II and SOFA score (p < 0.05). In summary, as a quantification standard of the Chinese experts' consensus, the CDSS is conducive to the standardized diagnosis of DIC because of its favorable diagnostic and prognostic utility.

New Biomarkers for Prediction of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Patients With Sepsis

Complication of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a determinant of the prognosis for patients with sepsis. The purpose of this study was to find DIC-related peptides in blood for prediction and early diagnosis of DIC in patients with sepsis. The participants were 20 patients with sepsis (age: 68.9 ± 11.4 years) and they were divided into 2 groups with (n = 8) and without (n = 12) a complication of DIC. Peptides in the serum of the patients were inclusively analyzed by a new method for peptidome analysis using a target plate, BLOTCHIP. By differential analysis of peptides in the blood from patients in the groups with and without DIC, we selected 13 mass spectrometry (MS) peaks as candidate marker peptides for prediction of DIC. By subsequent MS/MS structural analysis, 8 peptides were successfully identified as marker peptides for DIC in patients with sepsis. The peptides were fragments of serum amyloid A-2 protein, α2-HS-glycoprotein, fibrinogen α chain, fibrinogen β chain, serum albumin, collagen α1 (I) chain, collagen α1 (III) chain, and coagulation factor XIII A chain. In receiver–operating characteristic analysis for the relationships between the marker peptides and DIC, the area under the curve for each of these peptides was 0.594 to 0.760. We identified 8 blood marker peptides for prediction of DIC complication in patients with sepsis. Further studies by direct measurements of the serum peptide levels in larger numbers of patients with sepsis-induced DIC are needed to confirm the findings of this study.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: An Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired clinicobiological syndrome characterized by widespread activation of coagulation leading to fibrin deposition in the vasculature, organ dysfunction, consumption of clotting factors and platelets, and life-threatening hemorrhage. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is provoked by several underlying disorders (sepsis, cancer, trauma, and pregnancy complicated with eclampsia or other calamities). Treatment of the underlying disease and elimination of the trigger mechanism are the cornerstone therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic strategies specific for DIC aim to control activation of blood coagulation and bleeding risk. The clinical trials using DIC as entry criterion are limited. Large randomized, phase III clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of antithrombin (AT), activated protein C (APC), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and thrombomodulin (TM) in patients with sepsis, but the diagnosis of DIC was not part of the inclusion criteria. Treatment with APC reduced 28-day mortality of patients with severe sepsis, including patients retrospectively assigned to a subgroup with sepsis-associated DIC. Treatment with APC did not have any positive effects in other patient groups. The APC treatment increased the bleeding risk in patients with sepsis, which led to the withdrawal of this drug from the market. Treatment with AT failed to reduce 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis, but a retrospective subgroup analysis suggested possible efficacy in patients with DIC. Clinical studies with recombinant TFPI or TM have been carried out showing promising results. The efficacy and safety of other anticoagulants (ie, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin) or transfusion of platelet concentrates or clotting factor concentrates have not been objectively assessed.

Evaluation of the new Chinese Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scoring System in critically ill patients: A multicenter prospective study

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common life-threatening complication in critically ill patients. The diagnostic scoring systems of DIC enable a more prompt and accurate diagnosis of DIC, such as the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW). This study prospectively evaluated the newly proposed Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS), which was conducted at 18 centers in China during a one-year period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that, for diagnosis of DIC and for prediction of the 28-day all-cause mortality, the CDSS had larger areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) than the ISTH and the JAAM in different groups. The CDSS also had larger AUC than the JMHW for the ISTH DIC in non-infectious diseases. All of the AUCs of the CDSS were greater than 0.8, accompanied with both high sensitivity and high specificity. Furthermore, the CDSS score was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.882; p < 0.001), and could reflect the illness severity (p < 0.001 for Spearman’s rank correlations with the scores of severity). In conclusion, the CDSS is worthy of promotion with a better diagnostic and prognostic value for DIC.

Human Recombinant Antithrombin (ATryn®) Administration Improves Survival and Prevents Intravascular Coagulation After Intraportal Islet Transplantation in a Piglet Model

Human islet transplantation is a viable treatment option for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, pancreatic islet inflammation after transplantation induced by innate immune responses is likely to hinder graft function. This is mediated by incompatibility between islets and the blood interface, known as instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR). Herein we hypothesized that portal venous administration of islet cells with human recombinant antithrombin (ATryn®), a serine protease inhibitor (serpin), which plays a central role in the physiological regulation of coagulation and exerts indirect anti-inflammatory activities, may offset coagulation abnormalities such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and IBMIR. The current prospective, randomized experiment was conducted using an established preclinical pig model. Three groups were constituted for digested pancreatic tissue transplantation (0.15 ml/kg): control, NaCl 0.9% (n = 7); gold standard, heparin (25 UI/kg) (n = 7); and human recombinant ATryn® (500 UI/kg) (n = 7). Blood samples were collected over time (T0 to 24 h), and biochemical, coagulation, and inflammatory parameters were evaluated. In both the control and heparin groups, one animal died after a portal thrombosis, while no deaths occurred in the ATryn®-treated group. As expected, islet transplantation was associated with an increase in plasma IL-6 or TNF-α levels in all three groups. However, DIC was only observed in the control group, an effect that was suppressed after ATryn® administration. ATryn® administration increased antithrombin activity by 800%, which remained at 200% for the remaining period of the study, without any hemorrhagic complications. These studies suggest that coadministration of ATryn® and pancreatic islets via intraportal transplantation may be a valuable therapeutic approach for DIC without risk for islets and subjects.