Non-infectious uveitis burden on quality of life and work impairment assessed through different psychometric questionnaires

Self-Perceived Difficulty in Job Performance by Working Patients with Uveitis: Global Assessment and by Subscales of Work Demands

PURPOSE

To evaluate a worker's self-perceived difficulty in job performance as a whole and by subscales of job demands in a sample of working patients with uveitis and to analyze the relationship with sociodemographic, occupational, and clinical variables.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, cross-association study was conducted. Participants completed the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ) to assess self-perceived difficulty in job performance. Clinical data were collected from the patients' medical records or instruments used to evaluate clinical parameters in practice. Two clinical groups were established for this study. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess associations between variables.

RESULTS

Sixty participants were included in the study. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, active uveitis was significantly associated with a worse WRFQ total score (coefficient, -25.1; 95% CI, -36.6 to -13.6; p < 0.001). Acute course uveitis was significantly associated with a better total score than recurrent and chronic uveitis (coefficient, 17.7; 95% CI, 3.7 to 31.7; p = 0.014). In bivariate analysis, patients with active uveitis also scored worse on all subscales and on the total score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with active uveitis presented with greater self-perceived difficulty in the performance of their work as a whole and in all subscales of work demands. Patients with acute uveitis presented with less difficulty than those with recurrent and chronic uveitis. Early and correct treatment of uveitis in specialized units may reduce its impact on patients' work impairment.

Measurable Outcomes of an Ophthalmology and Rheumatology Coordinated Care Clinic

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the impact of an Ophthalmology/Rheumatology multidisciplinary clinic for patients with anterior uveitis by comparing outcomes between those who received traditional care (TC) versus coordinated care (CC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children with anterior uveitis from a pediatric tertiary care center between 2013 and 2022. Standard descriptive statistics were used; survival analyses explored differences in cohort disease activity and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment. Steroid treatment by cohort was compared using generalized estimating equation model with Poisson distribution and log link. Complications were compared using logistic regression. Number of visits in each cohort were assessed using Poisson generalized estimating equation model adjusted for complications.

RESULTS

We studied 215 patients with anterior uveitis; 66% were female, 53% had juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and 23% were idiopathic, with a median age at diagnosis of 8 years old (interquartile range 5-12). CC was associated with a 60% higher hazard of reaching disease control (hazard ratio 1.6; P < 0.01) when controlling for time since diagnosis and anterior chamber cell counts at the beginning of disease activity. CC was associated with starting biologic DMARDs earlier than TC (P < 0.01). Compared with the group who received TC, the group who received CC had a 96% lower rate of glucocorticoid reception per appointment within the first year (P < 0.01). The visit rate was 64% lower for the group who received CC when controlling for total complications per patient.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received multidisciplinary care had better outcomes than patients who received TC. Limitations include different cohort start times and absence of defined criteria for CC referral.

Work Productivity and Activities of Daily Living in Working Patients with Uveitis

PURPOSE

To assess self-reported impairment of work productivity and activities of daily living and the indirect costs of absenteeism in a sample of working patients with uveitis and to examine their association with sociodemographic, occupational, and clinical variables.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, cross-association study. Participants completed the self-administered Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire uveitis 2.0 to assess absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and impairment in activities of daily living. Clinical data were collected from the patients' medical records or instruments used to evaluate clinical parameters in practice. Indirect costs of absenteeism were assessed by the "lost wages method." Two clinical groups were established for this study. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the associations between variables.

RESULTS

The final sample comprised 60 participants. Factors significantly associated with increased overall work impairment in the multivariate linear regression analysis were active uveitis (coefficient, 31.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.1 to 46.9; p < 0.001) and presence of ocular comorbidities (coefficient for absence, -16.4; 95% CI, -31.1 to -1.8; p = 0.03). Factors significantly associated with increased impairment in activities of daily living were active uveitis (coefficient, 32.1; 95% CI, 18.2 to 46.0; p < 0.001), presence of ocular comorbidities (coefficient for absence, -23.5; 95% CI, -36.1 to -11.0; p < 0.001), and absence of nonocular comorbidities (coefficient 16.1; 95% CI, 3.9 to 28.3; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Active uveitis and ocular comorbidities are significantly associated with increased overall work impairment and impairment in activities of daily living in working patients with uveitis.

Ocular Damage Index, Ocular Pain and Subjective Visual Rating in Patients with Behçet's Uveitis: A Study of Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life

PURPOSE

The aim of our study is to assess subjective disease burden parameters (SVR and OP) as well as objective ones (BCVA and ODI) as predictors of HRQoL in Egyptian patients with BD uveitis.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with BD uveitis were recruited in this cross-sectional study from the Rheumatology Department, Cairo University Hospital. HRQoL was assessed using RAND-36 item health survey 1.0, subjective visual rating (SVR) was measured on a 6-point Likert scale. Ocular pain (OP) was rated on a numeric rating scale. The Ocular Damage Index (ODI) was calculated using the ocular domain of the BD damage index. Linear regression was performed to determine predictors of HRQoL metrics.

RESULTS

SVR predicted Vitality (β = 0.15, p = 0.004), Emotional Well-being (EW) (β = 0.13, p = 0.005), General Health (β = 0.18, p = 0.012) and Mental Component Summary (β = 0.22, p = 0.002). OP predicted Social Function (β = -3.18 p < 0.001), General Health (β = -1.55, p = 0.004), Physical Component Summary (β = -2.00, p = 0.007) and Mental Component Summary (β = -1.53, p = 0.005). BCVA predicted Physical Function (β = 31.1, p = 0.02) and Emotional Well-being (β = 7.94, p = 0.01). ODI failed to predict any HRQoL metrics. ODI was independent predictor of legal blindness adjusted for uveitis duration and severity. Legally blind patients had worse HRQoL metrics than patients with better vision.

CONCLUSION

In BD uveitis patients, subjective disease burden parameters were more informative about HRQoL metrics than objective ones. Longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the utility of ODI as an outcome measure in BD uveitis.

PRECIS

In Behcet's uveitis patients, health-related quality of life was related to visual outcome, ocular pain, and subjective visual rating. Ocular damage was an independent predictor of legal blindness, adjusted for uveitis duration and severity.

Psychosocial Well-Being and Quality of Life in Uveitis: A Review

PURPOSE

As a potentially sight-threatening disease with ocular, systemic, and treatment-related complications, uveitis diminishes quality of life (QOL) and affects psychosocial well-being. This review summarizes the existing tools for evaluating psychosocial well-being and/or QOL in patients with uveitis, explores the biological and non-biological factors affecting psychosocial well-being and/or QOL, and proposes future directions for incorporating these tools into clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to June 8, 2022 was conducted, screening for articles focused on psychosocial well-being and/or QOL in patients with uveitis. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In uveitis research, the most frequently studied patient-reported outcome measures were vision-related QOL (e.g. Visual Function Questionnaire [VFQ-25]) and health-related QOL (e.g. Short Form Survey [SF-36]), followed by mental health indicators including depression and anxiety. Instruments have also been developed specific to the pediatric population (e.g. Effects of Youngsters' Eyesight on Quality of Life [EYE-Q]). Generally, studies report worse psychosocial outcomes and QOL in patients with uveitis compared to the general population. Contributory factors include both clinical (e.g. visual impairment, ocular comorbidities) and patient-related (e.g. older age, female sex) factors.

CONCLUSION

Given the heterogeneity of instruments used, it is worth considering standardization across large uveitis studies and trials. Beyond research, given the biopsychosocial effects on patients with uveitis, there are benefits to incorporating QOL and psychosocial assessments into clinical practice. Simplification of questionnaires into abridged forms, focusing on the most clinically relevant aspects of patient care, may be considered.

Factors influencing treatment and time spent with physicians in patients with uveitis compared to other ophthalmology subspecialties in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

BACKGROUND

Cases of uveitis can necessitate long-term treatment resulting in recurrent follow-up appointments. Analysing the demographic distribution and patient factors influencing treatment and time spent with physicians in this population compared to other subspecialties of ophthalmology using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) has not previously been studied.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the NAMCS database, a large, nationally representative survey of office-based specialists, entered between 2012-2016 and 2018. Demographics, time with physician, and payor types were compared between patients with a uveitis-related diagnosis codes versus all other ophthalmic subspecialty diagnoses.

RESULTS

Overall, 12,870 ophthalmic patients were included of which 300 had uveitis-related diagnosis codes. Uveitis patients were more likely to be non-Caucasian (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.022), visiting the physician's office due to flare of or treatment for a chronic medical problem (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.022). Adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, uveitis patients spent a significantly longer time (mean 27.5 min) compared to comprehensive ophthalmology patients (mean 25.5 min) with their physician (p = 0.0041). Among the uveitis patient population, African American patients (p = 0.0053), Hispanic or Latino (p = 0.034), and Medicaid (p = 0.035) patients had increased office visit times.

CONCLUSIONS

Those with uveitis spent more time with the physician than comprehensive patients. Race, ethnicity, payor type, and the major reason for the visit all significantly impacted uveitis office visit times. In order to manage their schedules, providers should be aware of the additional support and time needed by these patients during office visits.

Online support group for patients with inflammatory eye disease: Characterisation of members and assessment of benefits

BACKGROUND

Support groups in ophthalmology may be of utmost importance for patients and caregivers. We aimed to characterise members of an online support group for patients and parents of children with inflammatory eye disease and assess the members' expectations and perceived benefits.

METHODS

A survey based on a voluntary, anonymous web questionnaire was distributed to the members of the 'Lirot' association online support group. The questionnaire included demographic, ocular and systemic information, functional and psychosocial data, support group use patterns, expectations and perceived benefits. Analysis was done for patients and parents.

RESULTS

Out of 67 respondents, 43 (64%) were patients, and 24 (36%) were parents. Fifty-eight (88%) were women. The mean age of respondents was 42.9 ± 1.34 years. Anterior uveitis was the most common, and most patients had good visual acuity (<0.3 logMAR). Parents reported higher anxiety levels (p = 0.044) and a more significant effect of their child's disease on their general function (p = 0.005). Most members sought several experts' opinions, psychological treatments and alternative medicine. All members used the WhatsApp group, while only approximately half used Facebook (p < 0.001). Members' expectations were fulfilled for social support, a sense of shared experience and being able to help others, but not for receiving information (p < 0.001). All members reported being willing to recommend the group to others.

CONCLUSIONS

Support group participation benefited group members. We suggest that ophthalmologists encourage their inflammatory eye disease patients to use online support groups, which may significantly improve their well-being.