1
|
Hrušková N, Berchová Bímová K, Davies Smith A, Škodová T, Bičíková M, Kolátorová L, Štětkářová I, Brožek Ľ, Javůrková A, Angelová G, Řasová K. People with newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis benefit from a complex preventative intervention-a single group prospective study with follow up. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1373401. [PMID: 38660088 PMCID: PMC11039797 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1373401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis frequently report fatigue, pain, depression and anxiety. Preventative programmes may be beneficial, but there is limited evidence of their effectiveness, especially long-term follow-up. Methods The programme consisted of 6-month face to face intervention (an introductory workshop, psychology-led group sessions and individual physical therapy) followed by 6-month self-guided therapy. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes measures were self-report questionnaires for fatigue, satisfaction with life and disease acceptance. Secondary outcomes were spirometry, spiroergometric parameters and neuroactive steroid levels. Results From 22 participants enrolled, 17 completed the first 6 months and 13 the follow-up. Fatigue measured on the Fatigue scale for motor and cognitive functions decreased significantly at 6 months (p = 0.035) and at follow-up (p = 0.007). The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (p = 0.035) and Satisfaction With Life Scale (p = 0.007) significantly increased at follow-up. Spirometry, spiroergometric parameters, steroid hormones and neuroactive steroids levels did not change significantly. Conclusion This programme reduces fatigue and improves satisfaction with life in this patient group with improvements sustained at 12 months. People who participated more frequently showed greater benefit. Clinical rehabilitation impact The paper describes the effects of a complex preventative intervention for people with newly diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis. The study found that this programme reduces fatigue and improves satisfaction with life with long-term benefit (at 12-month follow up). The individuals who participated less frequently experienced fewer benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natália Hrušková
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Kateřina Berchová Bímová
- Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czechia
| | - Angela Davies Smith
- MS Research, Treatment and Education, The Vassall Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tereza Škodová
- Department of Steroids and Proteofactors, Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czechia
| | - Marie Bičíková
- Department of Steroids and Proteofactors, Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czechia
| | - Lucie Kolátorová
- Department of Steroids and Proteofactors, Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czechia
| | - Ivana Štětkářová
- Department of Neurology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| | - Ľuba Brožek
- Mediterra s.r.o., Malvazinky Rehabilitation Clinic, Prague, Czechia
| | - Alena Javůrková
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Gabriela Angelová
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Kamila Řasová
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thompson CM, Pulido MD, Babu S, Zenzola N, Chiu C. Communication between persons with multiple sclerosis and their health care providers: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3341-3368. [PMID: 35927111 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study undertakes a scoping review of research about communication between persons with MS and their health care providers. DESIGN PubMed, PsycInfo, Communication Source, Socindex, Sociological Abstracts, Cinahl, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses were used to identify studies since each database's inception. Research team members engaged in study selection, coding for communication issues, and data extraction for descriptive information. RESULTS Of the 419 empirical articles identified, 175 were included. Codes represented all elements of ecological and pathway models, emphasizing emerging technologies for facilitating communication, uncertainty and anxiety for persons with MS, and communication issues surrounding diagnosis, information seeking, and decision making. CONCLUSION This review synthesizes and organizes influences on communication, communication processes, and health outcomes of communication for persons with MS and their providers. Findings extend the ecological model with illness context and the pathway model with communication breakdowns and provider outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health care providers should consider the complexity of communication when interacting with persons with MS, including the larger context in which it occurs, communication processes and their purposes, and short-term and long-term consequences of interactions. Ecological and pathway models can be frameworks for developing educational materials, as they succinctly capture key communication issues and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charee M Thompson
- Department of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.
| | - Manuel D Pulido
- Department of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA
| | - Sara Babu
- Department of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA
| | - Nicole Zenzola
- Department of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA
| | - Chungyi Chiu
- Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leavitt VM, Kever AM, Weinstein SM, Shinohara RT, Schmidt H, Aoun SM, Solari A, Solomon AJ. Diagnosis concealment is prevalent in MS, and associated with diagnosis experience. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 68:104373. [PMID: 36544320 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Receiving a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be stressful; later, patients may conceal their diagnosis. Here, we aimed to (1) assess prevalence of disclosure and concealment behaviors, and (2) explore whether diagnosis experience is associated with later concealment and if MS provider engagement on this topic modifies concealment. METHODS In a survey-based study, MS patients completed DISCO-MS assessing disclosure and concealment and responded to questions about diagnosis experience and practitioner attention to disclosure. Frequency analysis and Pearson's correlations were used in exploratory analyses. RESULTS 428 adults with MS participated. 49% (N = 201) conceal their diagnosis. Higher education [t(405) = 3.66, p < 0.001], younger age (r = -0.15, p = 0.002), and shorter disease duration (r = -0.18, p = 0.010) were associated with higher concealment. 39% (N = 159) anticipate negative consequences of disclosure. Individuals reporting positive diagnosis experience (26%, N = 102) were less likely to conceal later in disease course compared to those with negative experience (34%, N = 136) [t(233) = 2.483, p = 0.014]. Patients whose MS providers discussed disclosure (23%, N = 73) anticipated less negative consequences of disclosure [t(323) = 2.475, p = 0.014]. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis concealment is common in MS. Favorable diagnosis experience and provider attention to the topic of disclosure throughout the MS disease course may influence diagnosis concealment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V M Leavitt
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, Box 16, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - A M Kever
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, Box 16, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - S M Weinstein
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - R T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - H Schmidt
- Accelerated Cure Project, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - S M Aoun
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, University of Western Australia, La Trobe University, Australia
| | - A Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - A J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben-Zacharia AB, Blessing O, Eckardt PA. Psychometrics of the Multiple Sclerosis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Knowledge Patient Questionnaire: A Pilot Study. J Neurosci Nurs 2022; 54:171-176. [PMID: 35687725 DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: In the last few decades, the revised diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the development of numerous new MS therapies have created the possibility of early diagnosis and opportune MS management. However, these changes, and the mounting emphasis on patient choice and shared decision making, have not been accompanied by improvements in information provided to patients with MS (PwMS). Information provision for PwMS increases disease-related knowledge that may assist them in decision making and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to validate the Multiple Sclerosis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Knowledge Questionnaire (MSMRIKQ) to improve patients' shared decision-making capabilities. METHODS: In this methodological study, the instrument development process was completed in 4 stages using principles of measurement theory: (1) establishing a pool of items after patient and clinician panels' review, (2) evaluating the validity of the scale-both face and content validity, (3) pilot testing the scale, and (4) post-pilot testing statistical analysis of items and scale reliability and validity. RESULTS: The 20-item instrument was finalized based on a panel of MS experts' and patients' comments. The final version of the MSMRIKQ was pilot tested with a sample of 46 PwMS. Face validity was established on all MSMRIKQ items. Individual item-level and scale-level content validity indices for universal agreement estimates were acceptable at item-level content validity index = 1 and scale-level content validity index = 1 for the 20 items. The Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability estimate for the entire scale was 0.58; the Kuder-Richardson 20 estimates for the subscales of MS and magnetic resonance imaging knowledge were 0.35 and 0.51, respectively. The split-half reliability with Spearman-Brown correction for the total scale was 0.60. The Poisson regression model was significant for predicting MS knowledge within this population. CONCLUSION: The MSMRIKQ is a basic knowledge instrument for clinical and research use.
Collapse
|
5
|
Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Sánchez-Franco CM, Pérez-Haro MJ, Bello-Otero L, Aguado-Valcarcel M, González-Suárez I. Development of a scale for the evaluation of the quality of the shared decision process in multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268125. [PMID: 35560185 PMCID: PMC9106213 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last years, therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) have become challenging due to expanded options with different treatment profiles attending to efficacy, safety, and route and frequency of administration. Moreover, patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) increasingly wish to be involved in their therapeutic decision process. Therefore, a new, patient-centric shared decision model (SDM), is gaining relevance. However, validated scales oriented to assess the quality of the process itself are lacking. The AGA-25 scale is a fit-for-purpose 25-item scale based on two validated scales in MS (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)). The aim of this work is to develop and validate the AGAS-25 in Spanish. Two hundred and three PwMS (aged 17 to 67; 155 [76.4%] females) undergoing stable disease modifying treatment in the last 6 months were consecutively recruited. The Principal Component Analysis suggested a four-factor structure for the 25-item version of the questionnaire: 1) satisfaction with the SDM process 2) adverse events with the DMT, 3) convenience of the chosen-DMT and 4) information reliability. The internal consistency of the measurement was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88). Our results support the use of the AGAS-25 scale to assist SDM in Spanish-speaking PwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - María José Pérez-Haro
- Biostatech, Advice, Training and Innovation in Biostatistics, S.L. Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Laura Bello-Otero
- Neurologist, Neurology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
| | | | - Inés González-Suárez
- Neurologist, Neurology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen CH, Kang YN, Chiu PY, Huang YJ, Elwyn G, Wu MH, Kang JH, Hou WH, Kuo KN. Effectiveness of shared decision-making intervention in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: A randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2498-2504. [PMID: 33741234 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention among patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs) in terms of decision self-efficacy, control preferences, SDM process, decision satisfaction, and conflict. METHODS A total of 130 outpatients with LDDs recruited from orthopedic or rehabilitation clinics were randomly assigned to the SDM intervention (n = 67) or comparison (n = 63) groups. Patients in the intervention group received decision aids (DAs) with decision coaching and those in controlled group received standard educational materials from a health educator. The primary outcome was decision self-efficacy, and secondary outcomes were control preference, SDM process, conflict, and satisfaction. RESULTS The SDM intervention significantly improved decision self-efficacy (mean difference [MD] = 7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-12.5, partial η2 = 0.05) and reduced conflict (MD = -7.0, 95% CI: -12.2 to -1.9, partial η2 = 0.06), especially in patients without family involvement, compared with the health education group. However, no significant between-group differences were observed in other outcomes. CONCLUSION SDM intervention improved SDM self-efficacy and reduced conflict in patients with LDDs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians can integrate DAs and decision coaching in SDM conversations. SDM intervention seems to engage patients in decision-making, especially those without family involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Hsien Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-No Kang
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Yao Chiu
- Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jing Huang
- Research Center of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cochrane Institute for Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Meng-Huang Wu
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiunn-Horng Kang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsuan Hou
- Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ken N Kuo
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Claflin SB, Klekociuk S, Campbell JA, Bessing B, Palmer AJ, van der Mei I, Taylor BV. Association between MS-related knowledge, health literacy, self-efficacy, resilience, and quality of life in a large cohort of MS community members: A cross-sectional study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 54:103158. [PMID: 34329817 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite their potential importance, little is known about the associations between multiple sclerosis (MS) knowledge and other outcomes among MS community members. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationships between MS-related knowledge, health literacy, self-efficacy, resilience, quality of life (QoL), and MS symptom severity in a cohort of MS community members. METHODS In this cross-sectional study (N = 1993), we assessed a cohort of Understanding MS online course enrolees using means and standard deviations. We evaluated the impact of participant characteristics on outcomes using chi square, t-tests, and linear regression models, and assessed associations between outcomes using Pearson correlation. RESULTS We found that the total cohort had moderate to high scores on all outcomes. People living with MS had an above average mean MS knowledge score, but below average QoL, resilience, and health literacy scores. The association of MS status with outcome scores was supported by linear regression models. MS knowledge was not correlated with any other outcome for either people living with MS or without MS. CONCLUSIONS MS knowledge was not associated with the other study outcomes, suggesting that educational interventions that solely aim to increase knowledge may be ineffective in improving health-related outcomes within the MS community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzi B Claflin
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
| | - Shannon Klekociuk
- Wicking Dementia Education and Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Julie A Campbell
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Barnabas Bessing
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Andrew J Palmer
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Ingrid van der Mei
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Bruce V Taylor
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bessing B, Honan CA, van der Mei I, Taylor BV, Claflin SB. Development and psychometric properties of the Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge Assessment Scale: Rasch analysis of a novel tool for evaluating MS knowledge. Mult Scler 2021; 27:767-777. [PMID: 33739199 DOI: 10.1177/1352458520929626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS)-related knowledge is an important evaluation metric for health education interventions. However, few MS knowledge assessment tools are currently available for use. OBJECTIVES This study aims to develop a reliable and valid Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge Assessment Scale (MSKAS) for use in the MS community and the general public. METHODS The MSKAS was developed using a Delphi study methodology and was administered to participants in the first open enrolment of the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis (UMS) online course. Rasch analysis was used to examine its psychometric properties and develop the final scale. RESULTS Experts from across the MS community participated in the development of the MSKAS, resulting in an initial scale of 42 items. Five hundred and forty-three UMS participants completed the MSKAS; 89% were female and 30% were people with MS. The final unidimensional 22-item scale has a person separation index of 2.16, a person reliability index of 0.82, an item separation index of 11.19, and a Cronbach's alpha (kr-20) test reliability of 0.87. CONCLUSION The MSKAS is a unidimensional scale with good construct validity and internal consistency. The MSKAS has the potential to be useful for the assessment of MS knowledge in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barnabas Bessing
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Cynthia A Honan
- Division of Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | - Ingrid van der Mei
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Bruce V Taylor
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Suzi B Claflin
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Donisi V, Gajofatto A, Mazzi MA, Gobbin F, Busch IM, Ghellere A, Klonova A, Rudi D, Vitali F, Schena F, Del Piccolo L, Rimondini M. A Bio-Psycho-Social Co-created Intervention for Young Adults With Multiple Sclerosis (ESPRIMO): Rationale and Study Protocol for a Feasibility Study. Front Psychol 2021; 12:598726. [PMID: 33708157 PMCID: PMC7940381 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.598726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS), the most common neurological disease that causes disability in youth, does not only affect physical functions but is also associated with cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression, and anxiety and can significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Since MS is generally diagnosed at a young age-a period of great significance for personal, relational, and professional development-adaptation can become highly challenging. Therefore, enhancing the competence of young people to adaptively cope with these potential challenges is of utmost importance in order to promote their potentialities and talents. It has been shown that psychological interventions targeting MS patients can enhance resilience and HRQoL and that regular physical activity (PA) and social engagement can improve psychological well-being. However, literature on the development of global interventions based on the bio-psycho-social model of the disease is missing. Even less attention has been paid to interventions dedicated to young adults with MS (YawMS) and to the involvement of patients in the development of such programs. AIMS In collaboration with MS patients, this study aims to develop a bio-psycho-social intervention (ESPRIMO) for YawMS, aiming to improve their HRQoL and to explore its feasibility, acceptability, and effects. METHODS To tailor the intervention to the specific needs of YawMS, "patient engagement principles" will be adopted in the co-creation phase, performing a web survey and focus groups with patients and healthcare professionals. In the intervention phase, a pilot sample of 60 young adults with MS will be enrolled. The co-created intervention, composed of group sessions over a 12-week period, will cover psycho-social strategies and include physical activities. Adopting a longitudinal, pre-post evaluation design, self-report questionnaires measuring HRQoL and other bio-psycho-social features (e.g., resilience, well-being, mindfulness traits, self-efficacy, perceived social support, psychological symptoms, illness perception, committed action, fatigue, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, motivation, perception of autonomy support for PA, barriers and intentions to PA) will be administered, the quantity and quality of PA will be measured, and a questionnaire developed by the authors will be used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ESPRIMO intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Donisi
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Gajofatto
- Section of Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Mazzi
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Gobbin
- Section of Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Isolde Martina Busch
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ghellere
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alina Klonova
- Section of Movement Sciences, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Latvian Academy of Sport Education, Riga, Latvia
| | - Doriana Rudi
- Section of Movement Sciences, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Vitali
- Section of Movement Sciences, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Schena
- Section of Movement Sciences, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lidia Del Piccolo
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michela Rimondini
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rahn AC, Solari A, Beckerman H, Nicholas R, Wilkie D, Heesen C, Giordano A. "I Will Respect the Autonomy of My Patient": A Scoping Review of Shared Decision Making in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care 2021; 22:285-293. [PMID: 33424485 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2020-027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Patient autonomy is a bioethical principle that was strengthened in the revised Declaration of Geneva. Shared decision making (SDM) is particularly relevant in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) because many preference-sensitive decisions have to be made during the disease course. We aimed to summarize the available evidence on SDM in the MS field and to inform future research and practice. Methods We performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE (past 5 years). Studies were included if they reported primary/secondary research and focused on SDM related to people with MS. Data were grouped into topics, with results presented in narrative form. Results From 865 references, we included 55 studies conducted mostly in Europe. Half of the studies were observational, followed by qualitative (20%), mixed-methods (17%), randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 5%), quasi-experimental (5%), and reviews (4%). Most studies addressed people with relapsing-remitting MS (85%); the remaining addressed health care professionals, patients' significant others, or a combination. We identified five main topics: decisions on disease-modifying drugs, decisions on chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency treatment, information provision and patient education, health literacy, and risk knowledge. Conclusions The high proportion of included studies on SDM in MS in Europe suggests an earlier adoption of these concepts in this area. Decisions on disease-modifying drugs was the prevalent topic. Only 5% of studies were RCTs, indicating that more research is needed to study the effectiveness of SDM interventions. Studies addressing people with primary and secondary progressive MS are also needed.
Collapse
|
11
|
Oreja-Guevara C, Potra S, Bauer B, Centonze D, Giambastiani MP, Giovannoni G, Kesselring J, Langdon D, Morrow SA, Nouvet-Gire J, Pontaga M, Rieckmann P, Schippling S, Alexandri N, Shanahan J, Thompson H, Van Galen P, Vermersch P, Yeandle D. Joint Healthcare Professional and Patient Development of Communication Tools to Improve the Standard of MS Care. Adv Ther 2019; 36:3238-3252. [PMID: 31487006 PMCID: PMC6822792 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01071-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Effective communication between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) is important to enhance outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, in practice, patients often report a disconnect in communication. Communication tools to aid patient–HCP communication have a long history of use in many chronic conditions. For example, symptom diaries have been shown to enhance outcomes in cancer, headache and sleep disorder management. MS in the 21st Century, a Steering Group of HCP specialists and patients with MS (PwMS), has created two communication tools designed for use by both patients and their HCPs. Methods The Steering Group first identified prominent issues in patient–HCP communication through group discussions and survey data. Following this, a series of workshops led to the development of two communication tools as potential solutions to these identified issues in communication. Results The two most prominent issues identified were HCP time constraints during appointments and the misalignment of patient and HCP priorities—the communication tools developed through the workshops were created to address these. The “myMS priorities” tool [see supplementary materials] is designed to maximize the use of consultation time while the “myMS commitments” tool [see supplementary materials] aims to improve patient–HCP shared decision-making. Conclusions The MS in the 21st Century Steering Group adopted a broad, iterative and collaborative approach in the development of these tools to help ensure they would be as useful as possible to both HCPs and PwMS. These tools have been developed through shared patient–HCP expertise and are based on existing tools in other therapy areas as well as a review of the existing literature and data from MS in the 21st Century Steering Group surveys. The next steps will focus on the validation of these tools through testing them in real-world environments and clinical trials. Funding Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01071-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Stanca Potra
- Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Birgit Bauer
- Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Gavin Giovannoni
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | | | - Dawn Langdon
- Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Maija Pontaga
- Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Riga, Latvia
| | | | | | - Nektaria Alexandri
- Global Medical Affairs, Neurology and Immunology, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jane Shanahan
- Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Ascot, UK
| | | | - Pieter Van Galen
- Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - David Yeandle
- Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Col N, Alvarez E, Springmann V, Ionete C, Berrios Morales I, Solomon A, Kutz C, Griffin C, Tierman B, Livingston T, Patel M, van Leeuwen D, Ngo L, Pbert L. A Novel Tool to Improve Shared Decision Making and Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis: Development and Preliminary Testing. MDM Policy Pract 2019; 4:2381468319879134. [PMID: 31667351 PMCID: PMC6798166 DOI: 10.1177/2381468319879134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Most people with multiple sclerosis (MS) want to be
involved in medical decision making about disease-modifying therapies (DMTs),
but new approaches are needed to overcome barriers to participation.
Objectives. We sought to develop a shared decision-making
(SDM) tool for MS DMTs, evaluate patient and provider responses to the tool, and
address challenges encountered during development to guide a future trial.
Methods. We created a patient-centered design process
informed by image theory to develop the MS-SUPPORT SDM tool. Development
included semistructured interviews and alpha and beta testing with MS patients
and providers. Beta testing assessed dissemination and clinical integration
strategies, decision-making processes, communication, and adherence. Patients
evaluated the tool before and after a clinic visit. Results.
MS-SUPPORT combines self-assessment with tailored feedback to help patients
identify their treatment goals and preferences, correct misperceptions, frame
decisions, and promote adherence. MS-SUPPORT generates a personal summary of
their responses that patients can share with their provider to facilitate
communication. Alpha testing (14 patients) identified areas needing improvement,
resulting in reorganization and shortening of the tool. MS-SUPPORT was highly
rated in beta testing (15 patients, 4 providers) on patient-provider
communication, patient preparation, adherence, and other endpoints.
Dissemination through both patient and provider networks appeared feasible. All
patient testers wanted to share the summary report with their provider, but only
60% did. Limitations. Small sample size, no comparison group.
Conclusions. The development process resulted in a
patient-centered SDM tool for MS that may facilitate patient involvement in
decision making, help providers understand their patients’ preferences, and
improve adherence, though further testing is needed. Beta testing in real-world
conditions was critical to prepare the tool for future testing and inform the
design of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nananda Col
- Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, Maine
| | | | | | - Carolina Ionete
- University of Massachusetts Memorial Health Care, Worchester, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Christen Kutz
- Colorado Springs Neurological Associates, Colorado Springs, Colorado
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Long Ngo
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lori Pbert
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamm CP, Barin L, Gobbi C, Pot C, Calabrese P, Salmen A, Achtnichts L, Kesselring J, Puhan MA, von Wyl V. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with the first diagnostic consultation in multiple sclerosis: a Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR) study. J Neurol 2019; 267:153-161. [PMID: 31595377 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09563-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction is predictive of adherence, malpractice litigation and doctor-switching. OBJECTIVE To investigate which factors of the first diagnostic consultation (FDC) influence patient satisfaction and which topics persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) thought were missing. METHODS Using retrospective patient-reported data of the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry from PwMS with relapsing disease onset, we fitted ordered logistic regression models on satisfaction with FDC, with socio-demographic and FDC features as explanatory factors. RESULTS 386 PwMS diagnosed after 1995 were included. Good satisfaction with the FDC was associated with a conversation more than 20 min [multivariable odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 3.9 (2.42; 6.27)], covering many topics [1.35 (1.19; 1.54) per additional topic], the presence of a significant others [1.74 (1.03; 2.94) ], and shared decision making [3.39 (1.74; 6.59)]. Not receiving a specific diagnosis was main driver for low satisfaction [0.29 (0.15; 0.55)]. Main missing topics concerned long-term consequences (reported by 6.7%), psychological aspects (6.2%) and how to obtain support and further information (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS A conversation of more than 20 min covering many MS relevant topics, a clear communication of the diagnosis, the presence of a close relative or significant other, as well as shared decision making enhanced patient satisfaction with the FDC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980640.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Philipp Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. .,Neurocentre, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland.
| | - L Barin
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (FBK-IRVAPP), via Santa Croce 77, 38122, Trento, Italy
| | - C Gobbi
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - C Pot
- Service of Neurology and Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital, and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Calabrese
- Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology, Division of Molecular and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Salmen
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - L Achtnichts
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - J Kesselring
- Rehabilitation Centre, Kliniken Valens, Valens, Switzerland
| | - M A Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - V von Wyl
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bansback N, Chiu JA, Carruthers R, Metcalfe R, Lapointe E, Schabas A, Lenzen M, Lynd LD, Traboulsee A. Development and usability testing of a patient decision aid for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. BMC Neurol 2019; 19:173. [PMID: 31325961 PMCID: PMC6642472 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1382-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often struggle with treatment decisions, in part due to the increasing number of approved disease modifying therapies, each with different characteristics, and also since physicians can struggle to identify which of these characteristics matter most to each individual patient. Decision uncertainty can contribute to late treatment initiation and treatment non-adherence-causes of 'undertreatment' in MS. An interactive online patient decision aid that informs patients of their options, considers their individual preferences and goals, and facilitates conversations with their physicians, could improve how patients with relapsing forms of MS make evidence-based treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE To develop and evaluate a prototype patient decision aid (PtDA) for first-line disease modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS Informed by previous studies and International Patient Decision Aid Standards guidelines, a prototype PtDA was developed for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis considering first line treatment. Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis were recruited from the University of British Columbia's Multiple Sclerosis Clinic to participate in either an online survey or a focus group. Online survey participants completed the PtDA, followed by measures of acceptability, usability, and preparedness for decision-making, and provided general feedback. Focus group participants assessed usability of the revised PtDA. The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data led to improvements of the PtDA prototype. RESULTS The prototype PtDA received high ratings for acceptability and usability, and after its use, participants reported high-levels of preparedness for decision-making. Analysis of all qualitative data identified three key themes: the need for credible information; the usefulness of the PtDA; and the importance of normalizing and sharing experiences. Nine content areas were identified for revision. Overall, participants found the PtDA to be a valuable tool for facilitating treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS This mixed methods study has led to the development of a PtDA that can support patients with RRMS as they make treatment decisions. Future studies will assess the feasibility of implementation and the impact of the PtDA on both the timely treatment initiation and longer-term adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6 Canada
| | - Judy A. Chiu
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6 Canada
| | - Robert Carruthers
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Rebecca Metcalfe
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6 Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Lapointe
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Alice Schabas
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | | | - Larry D. Lynd
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Anthony Traboulsee
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Solari A. Web-based medical and health information in multiple sclerosis: for patients and physicians. Neurodegener Dis Manag 2018; 6:19-21. [PMID: 27874493 DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2016-0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Köpke S, Solari A, Rahn A, Khan F, Heesen C, Giordano A. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD008757. [PMID: 30317542 PMCID: PMC6517040 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008757.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are confronted with a number of important uncertainties concerning many aspects of the disease. These include diagnosis, prognosis, disease course, disease-modifying therapies, symptomatic therapies, and non-pharmacological interventions, among others. While people with MS demand adequate information to be able to actively participate in medical decision making and to self manage their disease, it has been shown that patients' disease-related knowledge is poor, therefore guidelines recommend clear and concise high-quality information at all stages of the disease. Several studies have outlined communication and information deficits in the care of people with MS. However, only a few information and decision support programmes have been published. OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this updated review was to evaluate the effectiveness of information provision interventions for people with MS that aim to promote informed choice and improve patient-relevant outcomes, Further objectives were to evaluate the components and the developmental processes of the complex interventions used, to highlight the quantity and the certainty of the research evidence available, and to set an agenda for future research. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register, which contains trials from CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2017, Issue 11), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, PEDro, and clinical trials registries (29 November 2017) as well as other sources. We also searched reference lists of identified articles and contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomised controlled trials, and quasi-randomised trials comparing information provision for people with MS or suspected MS (intervention groups) with usual care or other types of information provision (control groups) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance and methodological quality and extracted data. Critical appraisal of studies addressed the risk of selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, and detection bias. We contacted authors of relevant studies for additional information. MAIN RESULTS We identified one new RCT (73 participants), which when added to the 10 previously included RCTs resulted in a total of 11 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria and were analysed (1387 participants overall; mean age, range: 31 to 51; percentage women, range: 63% to 100%; percentage relapsing-remitting MS course, range: 45% to 100%). The interventions addressed a variety of topics using different approaches for information provision in different settings. Topics included disease-modifying therapy, relapse management, self care strategies, fatigue management, family planning, and general health promotion. The active intervention components included decision aids, decision coaching, educational programmes, self care programmes, and personal interviews with physicians. All studies used one or more components, but the number and extent differed markedly between studies. The studies had a variable risk of bias. We did not perform meta-analyses due to marked clinical heterogeneity. All five studies assessing MS-related knowledge (505 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) detected significant differences between groups as a result of the interventions, indicating that information provision may successfully increase participants' knowledge. There were mixed results on decision making (five studies, 793 participants; low-certainty evidence) and quality of life (six studies, 671 participants; low-certainty evidence). No adverse events were detected in the seven studies reporting this outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Information provision for people with MS seems to increase disease-related knowledge, with less clear results on decision making and quality of life. The included studies in this review reported no negative side effects of providing disease-related information to people with MS. Interpretation of study results remains challenging due to the marked heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Köpke
- University of LübeckNursing Research Group, Institute of Social Medicine and EpidemiologyRatzeburger Allee 160LübeckGermanyD‐23538
| | - Alessandra Solari
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. ‐ Neurological Institute Carlo BestaNeuroepidemiology UnitVia Celoria 11MilanItaly20133
| | - Anne Rahn
- University Medical CenterInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple SclerosisMartinistr 52HamburgGermany20246
| | - Fary Khan
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park CampusDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicinePoplar RoadParkvilleMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Christoph Heesen
- University Medical CenterInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple SclerosisMartinistr 52HamburgGermany20246
| | - Andrea Giordano
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. ‐ Neurological Institute Carlo BestaNeuroepidemiology UnitVia Celoria 11MilanItaly20133
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Feys P, Giovannoni G, Dijsselbloem N, Centonze D, Eelen P, Lykke Andersen S. The importance of a multi-disciplinary perspective and patient activation programmes in MS management. Mult Scler 2018; 22:34-46. [PMID: 27465614 DOI: 10.1177/1352458516650741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive disease associated with a large variety of symptoms and changing patients' needs during the disease course. In order to provide appropriate care in every disease stage and let patients live their lives to the full, a multi-disciplinary approach and patient activation is needed. OBJECTIVE To summarise the multi-disciplinary perspective of MS, with focus on the organisation of a multi-disciplinary care team and possibilities to support patient activation. METHODS This review reflects the content of the presentations, audience polling results and discussions on the multi-disciplinary perspective of MS during the second Pan-European MS Multi-stakeholder Colloquium. RESULTS In many countries, the neurologist with or without the support of an MS nurse is responsible for the long-term care of MS patients. When needed, they should refer to other (non-)medical specialists. However, the patient should be empowered as well to manage his/her disease and to implement a physically active lifestyle in order to improve treatment outcomes and quality of life. CONCLUSION To create equal access to care for MS patients across Europe, evidence-based standards of care, symptom self-monitoring tools and educational programmes for patients and healthcare professionals including non-medical treatment strategies should be developed at the European level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Feys
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Gavin Giovannoni
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | | | - Diego Centonze
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy/IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Piet Eelen
- National Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Melsbroek, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Perspectives from the Patient and the Healthcare Professional in Multiple Sclerosis: Social Media and Patient Education. Neurol Ther 2017; 7:23-36. [PMID: 29243028 PMCID: PMC5990508 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-017-0087-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is life-altering. Because the course of MS is heterogeneous, patients may face uncertainty in terms of long-term physical and cognitive challenges, potential loss of employment, and the risk of social isolation. Patients often turn to the Internet and social media for information about MS and its management, and to seek out fellow patients and support groups. Here, we examine the use of social media and the Internet among patients with MS, considering its impact on patient education. We consider the access that these conduits provide not only to other patients with MS but also to a wealth of disease-related information online. These themes are further illustrated with first-hand experiences of the patient author and her physician. We also explore the impact of the Internet and social media on the education and support of patients with MS from the healthcare professional’s (HCP’s) perspective, including opportunities for HCPs to promote disease education among their patients, and the advantages that arise from patients being better informed about their disease. The rise of the Internet and social media has changed the patient experience, helping patients to support each other, to educate themselves proactively about their condition, and to participate more actively in decisions relating to disease management than perhaps was the case historically. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Mattarozzi K, Sfrisi F, Caniglia F, De Palma A, Martoni M. What patients' complaints and praise tell the health practitioner: implications for health care quality. A qualitative research study. Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29:83-89. [PMID: 27920247 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective In order to identify which health care aspects play a role in patient satisfaction and quality of health care, the present study analyses a large number of instances of complaint and praise. Design and setting One thousand two hundred and thirty-five instances of complaint and one thousand five hundred thirty-six of praise submitted from patients or other souces (i.e. a patient's family member or a legal representative) to a northern-Italian hospital were analysed. Main outcome measures We adopted Reader and colleagues' (2014) patients' complaint taxonomy, in conjunction with a detailed content analysis of relationship and communication of information aspects. Results The most frequent causes of complaint concerned care system management (68.1%), particularly the time taken to access treatment, and relationship aspects (52.8%). The importance of relationship aspects was confirmed by the expression of gratitude through praise (89%). The most critical factor of the relationship domain was effective communication of information to the patient (39.3%). Frequently patients complained of: (i) having received information that was inconsistent with the truth, (ii) having had difficulty in obtaining information, and (iii) untimely communication of information. Clinical aspects did not seem to be the main factors that triggered a complaint (36,8%), and, when indicated, they were almost always associated with relationship issues. Conclusions This study indicates that not only complaints, but also instances of praise, are a potentially important source of information regarding health care aspects that play a role in patient satisfaction and quality of care. Our findings underline the relevance of relationship aspects in determining patients' satisfaction with the care received. In particular, health practitioners should focus their attention on how information is understood, translated and applied by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katia Mattarozzi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, V.le Berti Pichat, 5, 40127Bologna, Italy
| | - Fiamma Sfrisi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, V.le Berti Pichat, 5, 40127Bologna, Italy
| | - Filippo Caniglia
- "Ufficio Relazioni con il Pubblico e con le Associazioni di Volontariato", Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Via Albertoni 15, 40138Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra De Palma
- "Medicina Legale e Gestione Integrata del Rischio", Local Health Trust, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138Bologna, Italy
| | - Monica Martoni
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, V.le Berti Pichat, 5, 40127Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Heesen C, Pöttgen J, Rahn AC, Liethmann K, Kasper J, Vahter L, Drulovic J, Van Nunen A, Wilkie D, Beckmann Y, Paul F, Köpke S, Giordano A, Solari A. What should a person with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis know? - Focus group and survey data of a risk knowledge questionnaire (RIKNO 2.0). Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 18:186-195. [PMID: 29141808 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk knowledge is relevant to make informed decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS). The risk knowledge questionnaire for relapsing-remitting MS (RIKNO 1.0) was developed and piloted in Germany. OBJECTIVE To produce a revised RIKNO 2.0 questionnaire using mixed methodology in a European setting. METHODS The questionnaire was translated in seven languages. MS patient and health professional (HP) expert feedback was obtained from Germany, Italy, Estonia, Serbia, and the UK. A German web-based survey of RIKNO 2.0 compared the tool with the MS Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ), each one used with two versions (with/without a "don't know" DN option). RESULTS While RIKNO 2.0 was considered difficult, it was rated as highly educational. One item was reframed, and two new items were added. The web-based German survey (n = 708 completers) showed that the DN version did not increase participation rate and did not produce significantly higher scores. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) without SN response was 0.73. RIKNO 2.0 scores showed normality distribution irrespective of the answering format. Item difficulty was high ranging from 0.07 to 0.79. Less than 50% of questions were answered correctly (mean 8.9) compared to 80.4% in the MSKQ (mean 20.1). Higher numeracy competency and education were significantly, albeit weakly, associated to higher scores for both RIKNO 2.0 and MSKQ. CONCLUSION Including "don't know" options in knowledge questionnaires does not increase percentage of correct replies. RIKNO 2.0 is a complex questionnaire to be used in an educational context and studies on patient information. The tool is now available in seven languages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Heesen
- Institut für Neuroimmunologie und Multiple Sklerose, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - J Pöttgen
- Institut für Neuroimmunologie und Multiple Sklerose, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - A C Rahn
- Institut für Neuroimmunologie und Multiple Sklerose, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Papendamm 21, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - K Liethmann
- Institut für Neuroimmunologie und Multiple Sklerose, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Papendamm 21, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - J Kasper
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Arctic University of Norway, 9073 Tromsø, Norway.
| | - L Vahter
- Department of Neurology, West-Tallinn Central Hospital, Paldiski mnt. 68, 10617 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - J Drulovic
- Institute of Neurology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Dr. Subotića Starijeg 6, 11000 Beograd, Serbia.
| | - A Van Nunen
- National MS-Centrum, Melsbroek, Vereeckenstraat 44, 1820 Melsbroek, Belgium.
| | - D Wilkie
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Neurology, Imperial College, Room 10L18 (Lab Block, Charing Cross Campus, Hammersmith, London W6 8RF, UK.
| | - Y Beckmann
- Department of Neurology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Konak Mahallesi, İnönü Cad. 269. Sok. No:102, 35150 Karabağlar, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - F Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - S Köpke
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lübeck, Germany.
| | - A Giordano
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - A Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Giovannetti AM, Giordano A, Pietrolongo E, Confalonieri P, De Luca G, Tortorella C, Trojano M, Messmer Uccelli M, Torri Clerici V, Gitto L, Köpke S, Borreani C, Heesen C, Solari A. Managing the transition (ManTra): a resource for persons with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and their health professionals: protocol for a mixed-methods study in Italy. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017254. [PMID: 28838904 PMCID: PMC5724224 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION 15 years after clinical onset, about 50% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis convert to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Notwithstanding the importance of this transition, knowledge of the experiences and needs of patients and carers is fragmentary, and targeted interventions are not available. Managing the Transition to SPMS (ManTra) is a mixed methodology project to develop and test a user-led resource for newly diagnosed patients with SPMS. Here, we describe the developmental phase, consisting of a literature review and a new research study involving key stakeholders, in which we construct the resource. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Round 1: The literature review and study will be conducted in parallel. The latter will identify patient needs using a qualitative approach consisting of: personal semistructured interviews with >15 recently diagnosed patients with SPMS; three focus group meetings (one with significant others of patients, one with neurologists and one with other health professionals caring for patients with SPMS). An online survey (>200 recently diagnosed Italian patients with SPMS) will follow to verify needs in a larger independent sample. An expert panel will outline a set of candidate resources/interventions that aim to satisfy the needs thus identified. Round 2: Consensus on the final resource will be obtained in a 1-day meeting of recently diagnosed patients with SPMS, significant others, health professionals and other stakeholders, using the nominal group technique. The expert panel will refine the resource, identify the outcome measures to assess its efficacy and ascertain the most suitable comparator (ManTra Phase 2, not part of this protocol). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of each of the involved centres: Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milan ; G D'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara and the Aldo Moro University of Bari. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and a lay summary sent to participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambra Mara Giovannetti
- Unit of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milano, Italy
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Giordano
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Erika Pietrolongo
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Paolo Confalonieri
- Unit of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Giovanna De Luca
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Carla Tortorella
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Torri Clerici
- Unit of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Lara Gitto
- CEIS Economic Evaluation and HTA, Università degli Studi di Roma ‘Tor Vergata’, Roma, Italy
| | - Sascha Köpke
- Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Claudia Borreani
- Unit of Clinical Psychology, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale per la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Christoph Heesen
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandra Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Solheim AM, Mygland Å, Ljøstad U. Quality of multiple sclerosis out-patient health care services with focus on patient reported experiences. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10:250. [PMID: 28683760 PMCID: PMC5501112 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2568-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate multiple sclerosis (MS) patients’ satisfaction with out-patient follow-up in a general neurological hospital department. Patients with definite MS living in Vest-Agder county, Norway were invited to answer a questionnaire comprising one question regarding overall satisfaction, and 24 questions regarding demographics, disease characteristics, and experiences with different aspects of the health care services. Results Out of 330 invited patients, 159 responded (48%). Mean overall satisfaction with health care was 3.5 (SD = 1.03) on a 1–5 Likert scale (1 = not at all, 5 = to a very large extent). The best sub scores were given on confidence in the physician’s competence (mean = 4.01), the physician speaks in an understandable way (mean = 4.07), expectation of good treatment (mean = 3.72), and perception of being submitted to wrong treatment (mean = 1.5). The worst scores were given on satisfaction with frequency of outpatient appointments (mean = 2.89) and delay of outpatient appointments (mean = 3.07). Four factors were associated with high overall satisfaction; receiving the disease modifying drug natalizumab (B = 0.549, p = 0.004), satisfaction with frequency of outpatient appointments (B = 0.242, p < 0.001), experience that the physician facilitates talking about what the patient finds important (B = 0.218, p = 0.001), and confidence with the physician’s competence (B = 0.453, p < 0.001). Conclusion The patients were rather satisfied with the content of follow-up, and less satisfied with the structure. Regular and predictable contact with a trustworthy physician that facilitates that the patient is able to talk about what is important was associated with higher overall satisfaction. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2568-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marit Solheim
- Department of Neurology, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Service Box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
| | - Åse Mygland
- Department of Neurology, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Service Box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Unn Ljøstad
- Department of Neurology, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Service Box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bisson EJ, Fakolade A, Pétrin J, Lamarre J, Finlayson M. Exercise interventions in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation need better reporting on comorbidities: a systematic scoping review. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31:1305-1312. [PMID: 28933610 DOI: 10.1177/0269215517698734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the extent to which exercise intervention studies in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation are addressing comorbidities and if researchers consider comorbidities as possible moderators or mediators of exercise outcomes. METHODS Five databases were searched from inception to January 8, 2016, for exercise-related terms in combination with multiple sclerosis. Studies were screened and limited to randomized control trials, full text, and English language. We assessed whether comorbidities were excluded or included, how they were reported and described, and if they were examined as possible moderators or mediators of exercise outcomes. RESULTS We reviewed 99 articles that included various exercise interventions, where the most common were general multi-faceted exercise training ( n=34), cardiovascular training ( n=18), progressive-resistance training ( n=12), and balance and gait training ( n=12). In total, 77 of 99 studies reported one or more comorbidities as an exclusion criterion. The most commonly excluded comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, cognitive impairments or psychiatric disorders, and unspecified conditions or contraindications. Only nine studies reported details on excluded participants with comorbidities. Across studies that reported comorbidities of included participants ( n=8), none examined comorbidities as possible moderators or mediators of exercise outcomes. CONCLUSION Although a variety of exercise interventions have positive outcomes, there is limited evidence that these interventions are generalizable to people with multiple sclerosis who have comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne J Bisson
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Afolasade Fakolade
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Pétrin
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Lamarre
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Marcia Finlayson
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nies YH, Islahudin F, Chong WW, Abdullah N, Ismail F, Ahmad Bustamam RS, Wong YF, Saladina JJ, Mohamed Shah N. Treatment decision-making among breast cancer patients in Malaysia. Patient Prefer Adherence 2017; 11:1767-1777. [PMID: 29081652 PMCID: PMC5652923 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s143611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated breast cancer patients' involvement level in the treatment decision-making process and the concordance between patients' and physician's perspectives in decision-making. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted involving physicians and newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from three public/teaching hospitals in Malaysia. The Control Preference Scale (CPS) was administered to patients and physicians, and the Krantz Health Opinion Survey (KHOS) was completed by the patients alone. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the association between sociodemographic characteristics, the patients' involvement in treatment decision-making, and patients' preference for behavioral involvement and information related to their disease. RESULTS The majority of patients preferred to share decision-making with their physicians (47.5%), while the second largest group preferred being passive (42.6%) and a small number preferred being active (9.8%). However, the physicians perceived that the majority of patients preferred active decision-making (56.9%), followed by those who desired shared decision-making (32.8%), and those who preferred passive decision-making (10.3%). The overall concordance was 26.5% (54 of 204 patient-physician dyads). The median of preference for information score and behavioral involvement score was 4 (interquartile range [IQR] =3-5) and 2 (IQR =2-3), respectively. In univariate analysis, the ethnicity and educational qualification of patients were significantly associated with the patients' preferred role in the process of treatment decision-making and the patients' preference for information seeking (p>0.05). However, only educational qualification (p=0.004) was significantly associated with patients' preference for information seeking in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Physicians failed to understand patients' perspectives and preferences in treatment decision-making. The concordance between physicians' perception and patients' perception was quite low as the physicians perceived that more than half of the patients were active in treatment decision-making. In actuality, more than half of patients perceived that they shared decision-making with their physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Fuad Ismail
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
| | | | - Yoke Fui Wong
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | | | - Noraida Mohamed Shah
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Correspondence: Noraida Mohamed Shah, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tel +60 3 9289 8038, Fax +60 3 2698 3271, Email
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
A systematic review of anxiety amongst people with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016; 10:145-168. [PMID: 27919483 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease, which poses significant psychological challenges. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify factors that are associated with anxiety in people with MS (PwMS). It aimed to examine the strength of evidence for factors associated with anxiety symptoms and identify limitations of existing studies. METHOD AND RESULTS One hundred and thirty one studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. A narrative synthesis was then conducted. Anxiety was found to be associated with a variety of demographic, physical, psychological, cognitive and social factors. A consistent finding was that anxiety was strongly associated with both high level of disability and low quality of life. A strong association between anxiety and depression was also found. CONCLUSION Implications for these results are discussed and a preliminary model of understanding anxiety in the context of MS is outlined. Given the overlap between anxiety and depression, a transdiagnostic treatment approach is suggested. In light of the shortcomings of extant studies, suggestions for future research are offered.
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
In a healthcare environment that is trying to achieve better clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, shared decision-making is a well-established concept that is gaining more interest. Multiple sclerosis is a preference-sensitive condition and provides the opportunity to implement decision aids at various decision points in the disease process. Literature about patient education and outcomes of shared decision aids in multiple sclerosis has been growing over the last decade. In this topical review, we present an overview of the current literature on shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis. While limitations to the generalizability and applicability of decision aids exist, there is evidence that decision aids and shared decision-making can be valuable tools in the clinical care of multiple sclerosis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Colligan
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Abby Metzler
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ezgi Tiryaki
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Daniali SS, Shahnazi H, Kazemi S, Marzbani E. THE EFFECT OF EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION ON KNOWLEDGE AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. Mater Sociomed 2016; 28:283-287. [PMID: 27698603 PMCID: PMC5034965 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.283-287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common autoimmune diseases affecting the central nervous system. The prevalence of it is increasing in our country too. The pain from disorders can affect quality of life. Several studies have pointed to the improvement of patients through educational intervention. This study attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention based on raising the awareness and self-efficacy for pain control among patients with multiple sclerosis during 2015 under the coverage of Isfahan MS Society (IMSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a quasi-experimental study involving pre-test, post-test and randomized control group conducted on 100 patients with MS referred to the Isfahan MS Society (IMSS). The educational intervention group learned the pain management self-care lesson during 4 weekly sessions. The data were collected through a self-structured questionnaire with adequate validity and reliability, containing demographic data, awareness and self-efficacy of pain control. The data were assessed through descriptive and analytical tests assisted by SPSS 17. The significant level was considered as P<0.05. RESULTS Concerning the questionnaire, 96% of the items were responded. Most participants were women. The frequency distribution of demographic variables was not significantly different between the two pre-test groups. After the intervention, the mean score of knowledge and efficacy among patients in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Educational interventions can improve awareness and self-efficacy for pain control among patients with MS. Therefore, such interventions can be designed to reduce physical and psychological complications following multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyde Shahrbanoo Daniali
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health Isfahan, University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran
| | | | - Samira Kazemi
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health Isfahan, University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arafah AM, Bouchard V, Mayo NE. Enrolling and keeping participants in multiple sclerosis self-management interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2016; 31:809-823. [PMID: 27401492 DOI: 10.1177/0269215516658338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to provide an estimate of expected enrolment and attrition rates based on published studies of existing self-management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis, and to identify contributing factors and impact on outcomes. REVIEW METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, OT Seeker, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. Controlled trials with or without randomization using either a between-group or within-person design were included if they met specified criteria. A random-effect meta-regression analysis was conducted to estimate the overall enrolment and attrition proportions, effect of person- and study-related factors, and impact on outcomes. RESULTS A total of 48 studies, comprising 4446 persons were identified. The estimated enrolment rate was 50.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49.6 to 51.1) and the estimated attrition rates in the intervention and control groups were 16.8% (95% CI: 16.2 to 17.3) and 14.4% (95% CI: 13.8 to 14.9), respectively. The main reported reason for refusing to participate was lack of interest (70.6%), while the reported reasons for dropping out were mainly owing to medical issues (26.1%) and disliking the intervention (17.9%). Trial, programme, and patient-related variables were found to influence the enrolment and/or attrition rates. Studies that had a 10% higher attrition rate had an effect size that was larger by 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.24). CONCLUSION Greater understanding of the factors associated with enrolment and attrition rates would help in planning and developing a more appealing self-management intervention that patients can easily accept and incorporate into their everyday lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa M Arafah
- 1 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,2 College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
| | - Vanessa Bouchard
- 1 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nancy E Mayo
- 1 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,3 McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.,4 Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Colombo C, Filippini G, Synnot A, Hill S, Guglielmino R, Traversa S, Confalonieri P, Mosconi P, Tramacere I. Development and assessment of a website presenting evidence-based information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project. BMC Neurol 2016; 16:30. [PMID: 26934873 PMCID: PMC4776365 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0552-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are increasingly using the Internet in the daily management of their condition. They search for high-quality information in plain language, from independent sources, based on reliable and up-to-date evidence. The Integrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences and Preferences (IN-DEEP) project in Italy and Australia aimed to provide people with MS and family members with an online source of evidence-based information, starting from their information needs. This paper reports on the Italian project’s website. Methods Contents, layout and wording were developed with people with MS and pilot-tested. The website was evaluated using an online 29-item questionnaire for ease of language, contents, navigation, and usefulness of information aimed at people with MS, family members and the general population. Results The website (http://indeep.istituto-besta.it/) is structured in multiple levels of information. The first topic was interferons-β for people with relapsing-remitting MS. In all, 433 people responded to the survey (276 people with MS, 68 family members and 89 others). The mean age was 45 years, almost 90 % had a high school diploma, about 80 % had relapsing-remitting MS, and the median disease duration was seven years. About 90 % judged the website clear, understandable, useful, and easy to navigate. Ninety percent of people with MS and family members would recommend it to others. Sixty-two percent reported they felt confident in making decisions on interferons-β after reading the website. Conclusions The model was judged clear and useful. It could be adapted to other topics and diseases. Clinicians may find it useful in their relationship with patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0552-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Colombo
- Department of Public Health, Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, IRCCS Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, via la Masa 19, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Scientific Direction, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy. .,Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Review Group, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Anneliese Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Plenty Road & Kingsbury Drive, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia. .,National Trauma Research Institute, Monash University/The Alfred, Level 4, 89 Commercial Road Melbourne, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Plenty Road & Kingsbury Drive, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
| | - Roberta Guglielmino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Silvia Traversa
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Paolo Confalonieri
- Department of Neuroimmunology, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, Via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paola Mosconi
- Department of Public Health, Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, IRCCS Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, via la Masa 19, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Irene Tramacere
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Review Group, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, Via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Muñoz San José A, Oreja-Guevara C, Cebolla Lorenzo S, Carrillo Notario L, Rodríguez Vega B, Bayón Pérez C. Intervenciones psicoterapéuticas y psicosociales para el manejo del estrés en esclerosis múltiple: aportación de intervenciones basadas en mindfulness. Neurologia 2016; 31:113-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2015.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Revised: 07/03/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
31
|
Muñoz San José A, Oreja-Guevara C, Cebolla Lorenzo S, Carrillo Notario L, Rodríguez Vega B, Bayón Pérez C. Psychotherapeutic and psychosocial interventions for managing stress in multiple sclerosis: The contribution of mindfulness-based interventions. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2015.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
32
|
The Communication of Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis: The Patients' Perspective. Mult Scler Int 2015; 2015:353828. [PMID: 26788369 PMCID: PMC4693007 DOI: 10.1155/2015/353828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the leading cause of nontraumatic neurological disability in young adults in Europe and in the United States. The uncertainty regarding its evolution makes the diagnosis disclosure a difficult process. Objective. The aim of the study was to provide patients' global perspective towards MS diagnosis communication. Methods. 150 consecutive patients, recently diagnosed with CIS or MS, were asked to complete a 17-item questionnaire assessing factors influencing their satisfaction with the information provided. Results. Eighty-six patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for MS and 64 for CIS. Diagnosis disclosure took place in a private setting and required in most cases (87.3%) less than 30 minutes. Most patients reported being moderately or highly satisfied with the information provided (75%). The degree of satisfaction seems significantly related to patients' younger age, a longer time dedicated to disclose the diagnosis, a CIS diagnosis, and, above all, tailored information and an adequate emotional support. Conclusion. Most patients reported a good degree of satisfaction about the communication of MS or CIS diagnosis. A fruitful relationship between patient and neurologist is essential to obtain a better acceptance of the disease, patients' compliance with chronic treatments and to improve patients' quality of life.
Collapse
|
33
|
Heesen C, Kasper J, Fischer K, Köpke S, Rahn A, Backhus I, Poettgen J, Vahter L, Drulovic J, Van Nunen A, Beckmann Y, Liethmann K, Giordano A, Fulcher G, Solari A. Risk Knowledge in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RIKNO 1.0)--Development of an Outcome Instrument for Educational Interventions. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0138364. [PMID: 26430887 PMCID: PMC4591974 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate risk knowledge of patients is a prerequisite for shared decision making but few attempts have been made to develop assessment tools. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of young adults with an increasing number of partially effective immunotherapies and therefore a paradigmatic disease to study patient involvement. OBJECTIVE/METHODS Based on an item bank of MS risk knowledge items and patient feedback including perceived relevance we developed a risk knowledge questionnaire for relapsing remitting (RR) MS (RIKNO 1.0) which was a primary outcome measure in a patient education trial (192 early RRMS patients). RESULTS Fourteen of the RIKNO 1.0 multiple-choice items were selected based on patient perceived relevance and item difficulty indices, and five on expert opinion. Mean item difficulty was 0.58, ranging from 0.14 to 0.79. Mean RIKNO 1.0 score increased after the educational intervention from 10.6 to 12.4 (p = 0.0003). Selected items were particularly difficult (e.g. those on absolute risk reductions of having a second relapse) and were answered correctly in only 30% of the patients, even after the intervention. CONCLUSION Despite its high difficulty, RIKNO 1.0 is a responsive instrument to assess risk knowledge in RRMS patients participating in educational interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Heesen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Dep. of Neurology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - J. Kasper
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - K. Fischer
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S. Köpke
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - A. Rahn
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Unit of Health Sciences and Education, MIN Faculty, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - I. Backhus
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J. Poettgen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L. Vahter
- Department of Neurology, West-Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - J. Drulovic
- Institute of Neurology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Y. Beckmann
- Department of Neurology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - K. Liethmann
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS Research (INIMS), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A. Giordano
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | | - A. Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lugaresi A, Rottoli MR, Patti F. Fostering adherence to injectable disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 2014; 14:1029-42. [PMID: 25109614 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2014.945523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis requires long-term management, often with disease-modifying therapies. Poor medication adherence, especially to injectables, can increase relapse and hospitalisation rates and consume healthcare resources. We discuss adherence definitions and terminology and its prevalence in multiple sclerosis (MS). Typical causes of poor adherence in patients with MS include: insufficient efficacy or tolerability, concurrent disorders, and consequences of MS (e.g., forgetfulness, depression, fatigue and poor motor skills). Ways to improve adherence rates are reviewed, focusing on interdisciplinary healthcare teams, good communication between healthcare workers and patients (and their families), ongoing support and digital tools to promote adherence. We consider open communication and continuing education to be key, and that MS nurses have a pivotal role in ensuring patients' adherence to MS medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Lugaresi
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University "G. d'Annunzio", Ospedale Clinicizzato "SS Annunziata", VII livello, Corpo A, Via dei Vestini snc, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Colombo C, Mosconi P, Confalonieri P, Baroni I, Traversa S, Hill SJ, Synnot AJ, Oprandi N, Filippini G. Web search behavior and information needs of people with multiple sclerosis: focus group study and analysis of online postings. Interact J Med Res 2014; 3:e12. [PMID: 25093374 PMCID: PMC4150054 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.3034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2013] [Revised: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and their family members increasingly seek health information on the Internet. There has been little exploration of how MS patients integrate health information with their needs, preferences, and values for decision making. The INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, and Preferences (IN-DEEP) project is a collaboration between Italian and Australian researchers and MS patients, aimed to make high-quality evidence accessible and meaningful to MS patients and families, developing a Web-based resource of evidence-based information starting from their information needs. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to analyze MS patients and their family members' experience about the Web-based health information, to evaluate how they asses this information, and how they integrate health information with personal values. METHODS We organized 6 focus groups, 3 with MS patients and 3 with family members, in the Northern, Central, and Southern parts of Italy (April-June 2011). They included 40 MS patients aged between 18 and 60, diagnosed as having MS at least 3 months earlier, and 20 family members aged 18 and over, being relatives of a person with at least a 3-months MS diagnosis. The focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim (Atlas software, V 6.0). Data were analyzed from a conceptual point of view through a coding system. An online forum was hosted by the Italian MS society on its Web platform to widen the collection of information. Nine questions were posted covering searching behavior, use of Web-based information, truthfulness of Web information. At the end, posts were downloaded and transcribed. RESULTS Information needs covered a comprehensive communication of diagnosis, prognosis, and adverse events of treatments, MS causes or risk factors, new drugs, practical, and lifestyle-related information. The Internet is considered useful by MS patients, however, at the beginning or in a later stage of the disease a refusal to actively search for information could occur. Participants used to search on the Web before or after their neurologist's visit or when a new therapy was proposed. Social networks are widely used to read others' stories and retrieve information about daily management. A critical issue was the difficulty of recognizing reliable information on the Web. Many sources were used but the neurologist was mostly the final source of treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS MS patients used the Internet as a tool to integrate information about the illness. Information needs covered a wide spectrum, the searched topics changed with progression of the disease. Criteria for evaluating Internet accuracy and credibility of information were often lacking or generic. This may limit the empowerment of patients in health care choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Colombo
- IRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milano, Italy, Department of Public Health, Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Köpke S, Solari A, Khan F, Heesen C, Giordano A. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD008757. [PMID: 24752330 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008757.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are confronted with a number of important uncertainties concerning many aspects of the disease. Among others, these include diagnosis, prognosis, disease course, disease-modifying therapies, symptomatic therapies and non-pharmacological interventions. It has been shown that people with MS demand adequate information to be able to actively participate in medical decision making and to self-manage their disease. On the other hand, it has been found that patients' disease-related knowledge is poor. Therefore, guidelines have recommended clear and concise high-quality information at all stages of the disease. Several studies have outlined communication and information deficits in the care of people with MS and, accordingly, a number of information and decision support programmes have been published. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of information provision interventions for people with MS that aim to promote informed choice and improve patient-relevant outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register which contains trials from CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 6), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, PEDro and clinical trials registries (12 June 2013) as well as other sources. In addition, we searched PsycINFO, trial registries, and reference lists of identified articles. We also contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials, cluster randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials comparing information provision for people with MS or suspected MS (intervention groups) with usual care or other types of information provision (control groups) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance and methodological quality, and extracted data. Critical appraisal of studies addressed the risk of selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias and detection bias. We contacted authors of relevant studies for additional information. MAIN RESULTS Ten randomised controlled trials involving a total of 1314 participants met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. The interventions addressed a variety of topics using different approaches for information provision in different settings. Topics included disease-modifying therapy, relapse management, self-care strategies, fatigue management, family planning and general health promotion. The interventions contained decision aids, educational programmes, self-care interventions and personal interviews with physicians. All interventions were complex interventions using more than one active component, but the number and extent of the intervention components differed markedly between studies. The studies had a variable risk of bias. We did not perform meta-analyses due to marked clinical heterogeneity. All four studies assessing MS-related knowledge (524 participants; moderate-quality evidence) detected significant differences between groups as a result of the interventions indicating that information provision may successfully increase participants' knowledge. There were mixed results from four studies reporting effects on decision making (836 participants; low-quality evidence) and from five studies assessing quality of life (605 participants; low-quality evidence). There were no adverse events in the six studies reporting on adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Information provision for people with MS seems to increase disease-related knowledge, with less clear results on decision making and quality of life. There seem to be no negative side effects from informing patients about their disease. Interpretation of study results remains challenging due to the marked heterogeneity of the interventions and outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Köpke
- Nursing Research Unit, Institute of Social Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, Germany, D-23538
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
As a consequence of the current shortened diagnostic workup, people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are rapidly confronted with a disease of uncertain prognosis that requires complex treatment decisions. This paper reviews studies that have assessed the experiences of PwMS in the peri-diagnostic period and have evaluated the efficacy of interventions providing information at this critical moment. The studies found that the emotional burden on PwMS at diagnosis was high, and emphasised the need for careful monitoring and management of mood symptoms (chiefly anxiety). Information provision did not affect anxiety symptoms but improved patients’ knowledge of their condition, the achievement of ‘informed choice’, and satisfaction with the diagnosis communication. It is vital to develop and implement information and decision aids for PwMS, but this is resource intensive, and international collaboration may be a way forward. The use of patient self-assessed outcome measures that appraise the quality of diagnosis communication is also important to allow health services to understand and meet the needs and preferences of PwMS.
Collapse
|
38
|
Interferon-beta-1a treatment has a positive effect on quality of life of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: Results from a longitudinal study. J Neurol Sci 2014; 337:180-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2013] [Revised: 11/27/2013] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
39
|
Rintell D, Melito R. "Her illness is a project we can work on together": developing a collaborative family-centered intervention model for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care 2014; 15:130-6. [PMID: 24453775 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This article presents a model for intervening with families that are addressing a new diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) in one member. The model is collaborative, integrative, and family-centered. It involves both working with the family collaboratively and providing strategies to promote greater collaboration within the family. The model integrates elements of crisis intervention theory, psycho-education, and family-centered approaches. The model was developed with families addressing MS, and was piloted with three families. The intervention was found to improve family members' ability to collaborate with each other. Such increased collaboration may enhance the family's ability to manage long-term illness more effectively, help the family address the impact of the illness on all family members, and generally improve the family's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rintell
- Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA, USA (DR); and private practice, Newton, MA, USA (RM)
| | - Richard Melito
- Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA, USA (DR); and private practice, Newton, MA, USA (RM)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Solari A, Grzeda M, Giordano A, Mattarozzi K, D'Alessandro R, Simone A, Tesio L. Use of Rasch analysis to refine a patient-reported questionnaire on satisfaction with communication of the multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Mult Scler 2014; 20:1224-33. [PMID: 24436456 DOI: 10.1177/1352458513518261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2013] [Accepted: 12/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Comunicazione medico-paziente nella Sclerosi Multipla - Revised (COSM-R) is a patient self-assessed questionnaire probing the moment of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis disclosure (section 1, five items) and following period (section 2, 15 items). OBJECTIVES This study examined COSM-R dimensionality and measurement properties through Rasch analysis (partial-credit model) and proposed a revised questionnaire. METHODS Cross-sectional COSM-R data were obtained from 1068 people with MS (PwMS, 1065 questionnaires) participating in four studies (102 centres). Mean age was 40 years (range 17-73); 70% were women; 53% were from Northern, 25% from Central, and 21% from Southern Italy. RESULTS Unidimensionality was not confirmed for COSM-R section 1, but was for section 2 after removal of three items. The revised instrument (COSM-S, Shortened) consisted of the original five-item checklist (section 1), modified by removing the table grouping of three items, and 12 of the original 15 section 2 items, which could now be summed and transformed into an interval scale. Scores were higher for items assessing emotional satisfaction than for those assessing informational satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The proposed COSM-S is a composite measure of satisfaction with MS diagnosis communication with improved metric properties over the original COSM-R, and whose section 2 satisfies Rasch model expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Italy
| | - M Grzeda
- Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Italy
| | - A Giordano
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Italy
| | - K Mattarozzi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - R D'Alessandro
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italy
| | - A Simone
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Italy
| | - L Tesio
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Italy Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Giordano A, Lugaresi A, Confalonieri P, Granella F, Radice D, Trojano M, Martinelli V, Solari A, Giordano A, Martinelli V, Lugaresi A, Pucci E, Granella F, Trojano M, Solari A, Martinelli V, Pucci E, Messmer Uccelli M, Lugaresi A, Giordano A, Granella F, Solari A, Giordano A, Ferrari G, Martini F, Solari A, Radice D, D’Annunzio G, Lugaresi A, Farina D, Travaglini D, Pietrolongo E, Onofrj M, Torri Clerici V, Bonanno S, Brambilla L, Confalonieri P, Martinelli V, Radaelli M, Messina J, Comi G, Tortorella C, Luciannatelli E, Trojano M, Senesi C, Tsantes E, Granella F, Conti MZ, Rottoli MR, Bellantonio P, Fischetti M, Fantozzi R, Pala A, Traccis S, Di Battista G, Bianchi M, Benedetti MD, Gaetani L, Di Filippo M, Carolei A, Totaro R, Lanzillo R, Brescia Morra V, Coppola R, Cottone S, Chiavazza C, Cavalla P, Leonardi C, Aguglia U, Ziuliani C, Valla P, Sasanelli F, Valentino P, Quattrone A, Martino PG, Russo M, Vita G, Immovilli P. Implementation of the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice: a late-phase controlled trial. Mult Scler 2014; 20:1234-43. [DOI: 10.1177/1352458513519180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 12/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: The SIMS-Trial showed that the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid (IA) for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) effectively improved patient knowledge and satisfaction with care. Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to assess the effectiveness of the IA in clinical practice and to compare the whole IA with the take-home booklet/website component alone. Methods: After updating the IA and replacing the CD with a website, a prospective, open-label non-randomised controlled trial compared the whole IA (group A, five SIMS-Trial centres) to take-home (group B, 16 centres). One month after the intervention, participants completed the MS Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ), care satisfaction questionnaire (COSM-R) (primary study outcomes), Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale, and ad hoc questionnaire appraising the IA. Results: We enrolled 159 newly diagnosed PwMS (May 2012–March 2013). Drop-outs were four of 77 (5%, group A) and 11/82 (13%, group B). Primary endpoint (highest tertile both for MSKQ and COSM-R section 2 scores) was achieved by 38/77 (49%) group A and 33/82 (40%) group B ( p = 0.25). Attainment of secondary outcomes was also similar between groups. Conclusions: This study shows that the entire IA is not superior to the booklet/website alone, and that both are comparable in efficacy to the intervention arm of the SIMS-Trial. Trial registration number: ISRCTN78940214.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Giordano
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Italy
| | - A Lugaresi
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University G. d’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - P Confalonieri
- Department of Neuroimmunology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Italy
| | - F Granella
- Department of Neurosciences, Neurology Unit, University of Parma, Italy
| | - D Radice
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Italy
| | - M Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Italy
| | - V Martinelli
- Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Italy
| | - A Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Palace J. Partnership and consent in MS treatment choice. J Neurol Sci 2013; 335:5-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2012] [Revised: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
43
|
Lugaresi A, di Ioia M, Travaglini D, Pietrolongo E, Pucci E, Onofrj M. Risk-benefit considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013; 9:893-914. [PMID: 23836975 PMCID: PMC3699254 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s45144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and mainly affects young adults. Its natural history has changed in recent years with the advent of disease-modifying drugs, which have been available since the early 1990s. The increasing number of first-line and second-line treatment options, together with the variable course of the disease and patient lifestyles and expectations, makes the therapeutic decision a real challenge. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of the main present and some future drugs for relapsing-remitting MS, including risk-benefit considerations, to enable readers to draw their own conclusions regarding the risk-benefit assessment of personalized treatment strategies, taking into account not only treatment-related but also disease-related risks. We performed a Medline literature search to identify studies on the treatment of MS with risk stratification and risk-benefit considerations. We focused our attention on studies of disease-modifying, immunomodulating, and immunosuppressive drugs, including monoclonal antibodies. Here we offer personal considerations, stemming from long-term experience in the treatment of MS and thorough discussions with other neurologists closely involved in the care of patients with the disease. MS specialists need to know not only the specific risks and benefits of single drugs, but also about drug interactions, either in simultaneous or serial combination therapy, and patient comorbidities, preferences, and fears. This has to be put into perspective, considering also the risks of untreated disease in patients with different clinical and radiological characteristics. There is no single best treatment strategy, but therapy has to be tailored to the patient. This is a time-consuming task, rich in complexity, and influenced by the attitude towards risk on the parts of both the patient and the clinical team. The broader the MS drug market becomes, the harder it will be for the clinician to help the patient decide which therapeutic strategy to opt for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Lugaresi
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria di Ioia
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Daniela Travaglini
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Erika Pietrolongo
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Eugenio Pucci
- Operative Unit Neurologia ASUR Marche Area Vasta 3, Macerata, Italy
| | - Marco Onofrj
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Heesen C, Köpke S, Solari A, Geiger F, Kasper J. Patient autonomy in multiple sclerosis--possible goals and assessment strategies. J Neurol Sci 2013; 331:2-9. [PMID: 23711752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2012] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Patient autonomy has been increasingly acknowledged as prerequisite for successful medical decision making in Western countries. In medical decisions with a need to involve a health professional, patient autonomy becomes apparent in the extent of patients' participation in the communication as described in the concept of shared decision making. Patient autonomy can be derived from different perspectives or goals and the focus of evaluation approaches may vary accordingly. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a paradigmatic disease to study patient autonomy mainly because MS patients are highly disease competent and due to ambiguous evidence on many aspects of disease-related medical decision making. This review gives an overview on measurement issues in studying decision making in MS, categorized according to prerequisites, process measures and outcomes of patient autonomy. As relevant prerequisites role preferences, risk attribution, risk tolerance, and risk knowledge are discussed. Regarding processes, we distinguish intra-psychic and interpersonal aspects. Intra-psychic processes are elucidated using the theory of planned behavior, which guided development of a 30-item scale to capture decisions about immunotherapy. Moreover, a theory of uncertainty management has been created resulting in the development of a corresponding measurement concept. Interpersonal processes evolving between physician and patient can be thoroughly analyzed from different perspectives by use of the newly developed comprehensive MAPPIN'SDM inventory. Concerning outcomes, besides health related outcomes, we discuss match of preferred roles during the decision encounters (preference match), decisional conflict as well as an application of the multidimensional measure of informed choice to decisions of MS patients. These approaches provide an overview on patient-inherent and interpersonal factors and processes modulating medical decision making and health behavior in MS and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Heesen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Clinical MS Research, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Heesen C, Köpke S, Kasper J, Poettgen J, Tallner A, Mohr DC, Gold SM. Behavioral interventions in multiple sclerosis: a biopsychosocial perspective. Expert Rev Neurother 2013; 12:1089-100. [PMID: 23039388 DOI: 10.1586/ern.12.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Managing uncertainty is a major challenge associated with the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition to physical symptoms, neuropsychiatric symptoms are highly prevalent in this disease. Depression in particular is more common in MS than in other chronic diseases. While substantial achievements have been made in the therapy of MS and an increasing number of immunomodulatory treatments are now available, the long-term benefits of these are still a matter of debate. Importantly, while the approved therapies show good efficacy on inflammatory lesions and relapse rate, and may slow certain aspects of disease progression, improvements in function have rarely been reported. On the other hand, behavioral interventions have recently been shown to significantly improve fatigue and depression as well as motor function. In addition, recent evidence suggests that group education or face-to-face behavioral interventions may decrease inflammatory disease activity (such as relapse rate or lesion formation measured by MRI). Therefore, behavioral interventions not only ameliorate symptoms but may have the potential to modify the disease process itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Heesen
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute for Neuroimmunology and Clinical MS Research and Department of Neurology, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rieckmann P, Boyko A, Centonze D, Coles A, Elovaara I, Havrdová E, Hommes O, Lelorier J, Morrow SA, Oreja-Guevara C, Rijke N, Schippling S. Future MS care: a consensus statement of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group. J Neurol 2012; 260:462-9. [PMID: 22936203 PMCID: PMC3566385 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6656-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Revised: 08/10/2012] [Accepted: 08/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The "MS in the 21st Century" initiative was established with the purpose of (1) defining how multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment and standards of care should look in the 21st century; (2) developing a minimum standard of care across the world; and (3) motivating the broad MS community to align standards of care and challenge the current treatment paradigm. The aim was to develop a consensus statement to reach and influence the broader MS community. An expert steering group from Europe and Canada-consisting of neurologists, patient advocates, a pharmacoepidemiologist/pharmacoeconomist, and representatives from national MS centers-participated in a series of workshop-driven meetings between February 2011 and 2012. After three phases of discussions, the steering group identified that the overall vision for future care of MS should be full access to personalized treatment, with reimbursement, to achieve freedom from disease. They constructed seven overall principles that support this vision: personalized care, patient engagement, commitment to research, regulatory body education and reimbursement issues, new endpoints in clinical trials, more therapy options, and MS centers of excellence. This consensus statement outlines the key aspects of the seven principles that need to be addressed. The "MS in the 21st Century Steering Group" hopes that this consensus statement acts as a call to action for healthcare providers and decision-makers to address simultaneously the overarching principles that will guide patient management in order to improve outcomes for people with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Rieckmann
- Department of Neurology, Sozialstiftung Bamberg Hospital, Bamberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Normann B, Sørgaard KW, Salvesen R, Moe S. Contextualized perceptions of movement as a source of expanded insight: People with multiple sclerosis' experience with physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract 2012; 29:19-30. [DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2012.698717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
48
|
Hill S, Filippini G, Synnot A, Summers M, Beecher D, Colombo C, Mosconi P, Battaglia MA, Shapland S, Osborne RH, Hawkins M. Presenting evidence-based health information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12:20. [PMID: 22424304 PMCID: PMC3315402 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2012] [Accepted: 03/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increasingly, evidence-based health information, in particular evidence from systematic reviews, is being made available to lay audiences, in addition to health professionals. Research efforts have focused on different formats for the lay presentation of health information. However, there is a paucity of data on how patients integrate evidence-based health information with other factors such as their preferences for information and experiences with information-seeking. The aim of this project is to explore how people with multiple sclerosis (MS) integrate health information with their needs, experiences, preferences and values and how these factors can be incorporated into an online resource of evidence-based health information provision for people with MS and their families. Methods This project is an Australian-Italian collaboration between researchers, MS societies and people with MS. Using a four-stage mixed methods design, a model will be developed for presenting evidence-based health information on the Internet for people with MS and their families. This evidence-based health information will draw upon systematic reviews of MS interventions from The Cochrane Library. Each stage of the project will build on the last. After conducting focus groups with people with MS and their family members (Stage 1), we will develop a model for summarising and presenting Cochrane MS reviews that is integrated with supporting information to aid understanding and decision making. This will be reviewed and finalised with people with MS, family members, health professionals and MS Society staff (Stage 2), before being uploaded to the Internet and evaluated (Stages 3 and 4). Discussion This project aims to produce accessible and meaningful evidence-based health information about MS for use in the varied decision making and management situations people encounter in everyday life. It is expected that the findings will be relevant to broader efforts to provide evidence-based health information for patients and the general public. The international collaboration also permits exploration of cultural differences that could inform international practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Lugaresi A, Ziemssen T, Oreja-Guevara C, Thomas D, Verdun E. Improving patient-physician dialog: commentary on the results of the MS Choices survey. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012; 6:143-52. [PMID: 22379365 PMCID: PMC3287418 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s27932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Achieving good long- and short-term adherence to treatment for chronic diseases is important if patients are to gain the full benefits of treatment. Several barriers to adherence in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been identified and the healthcare team should work with patients to help them to overcome these obstacles. The MS Choices survey explored patient and physician perspectives on key aspects of MS diagnosis, treatment adherence, and disease management with the aim of improving understanding of the factors that influence patient behavior regarding treatment adherence. The survey found some important differences between patient and physician responses and here these findings are discussed in the context of personal clinical experience. Further, the possible implications of these findings for routine practice have been considered, and strategies that should be employed by MS physicians and nurses to help patients to adhere to their prescribed treatment are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Lugaresi
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
- Correspondence: Alessandra Lugaresi, Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, c/o Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Ospedale, Clinicizzato “SS Annunziata”, Via dei Vestini 5, 66100 Chieti, Italy, Tel +39 0871 358 532, Email
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological University Clinic, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Department of Neurology, Health Research Institute (IdiPAZ), University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elisabetta Verdun
- Global Medical Affairs Neurology, Merck Serono S.A. – Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|