The value of losartan suppression test in the confirmatory diagnosis of primary aldosteronism in patients over 50 years old

Comparison of saline infusion test and captopril challenge test in the diagnosis of Chinese with primary aldosteronism in different age groups

Background

To explore the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal cutoff value between the saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) [including the value and suppression of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC)] for primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosing.

Methods

A total of 318 patients with hypertension were consecutively enrolled, including 126 patients with PA and 192 patients with essential hypertension (EH), in this observational study. The characteristics of patients and laboratory examinations were collected and compared. The comparison between SIT and CCT was carried by drawing the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) to explore the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal cutoff value.

Results

The average age was 51.59 ± 10.43 in the PA group and 45.72 ± 12.44 in the EH group (p<0.05). The optimal cutoff value was 10.7 ng/dL for post-CCT PAC, 6.8 ng/dL for post-SIT PAC, and 26.9% for suppression of post-CCT PAC. The diagnostic value of post-CCT PAC was the highest with 0.831 for the AUC and 0.552 for the Youden index. The optimal cutoff value for patients who were <50 years old was 11.5 ng/dL for post-CCT PAC and 8.4 ng/dL for post-SIT PAC. The suppression of post-CCT PAC turned to 18.2% for those of age 50 or older.

Conclusion

Compared with SIT, CCT had a higher diagnostic value when post-CCT PAC was used as the diagnostic criterion in Chinese people, while the selection of diagnostic thresholds depended on patient age.

Prospective evaluation of a telmisartan suppression test as a diagnostic tool for primary hyperaldosteronism in cats

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, telmisartan suppressed aldosterone secretion in healthy cats but not in cats with primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA).

HYPOTHESES

Telmisartan suppresses aldosterone secretion in middle-aged healthy cat and cats with diseases that may result in secondary hyperaldosteronism, but not in those with PHA.

ANIMALS

Thirty-eight cats: 5 with PHA; 16 with chronic kidney disease (CKD), subclassified as hypertensive (CKD-H) or non-hypertensive (CKD-NH); 9 with hyperthyroidism (HTH); 2 with idiopathic systemic arterial hypertension (ISH); and 6 healthy middle-aged cats.

METHODS

Prospective, cross-sectional study. Serum aldosterone concentration, potassium concentration, and systolic blood pressure were measured before and 1 and 1.5 hours after PO administration of 2 mg/kg of telmisartan. The aldosterone variation rate (AVR) was calculated for each cat.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the minimum AVR was observed among groups (median [quartile 1 (Q1); quartile 3 (Q3)]: 25 [0; 30]; 5 [-27; -75]; 10 [-6; -95]; 53 [19; 86]; 29 [5; 78]) for PHA, CKD, HTH, ISH, and healthy cats, respectively (P = .05). Basal serum aldosterone concentration (pmol/L) was significantly higher in PHA cats (median [Q1; Q3]: 2914 [2789; 4600]) than in CKD-H cats (median [Q1; Q3]: 239 [189; 577], corrected P value = .003) and CKD-NH cats (median [Q1; Q3]: 353 [136; 1371], corrected P value = .004).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The oral telmisartan suppression test using a single dose of 2 mg/kg telmisartan did not discriminate cats with PHA from healthy middle-aged cats or cats with diseases that may result in secondary hyperaldosteronism.

Evaluation of oral telmisartan administration as a suppression test for diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism in cats

BACKGROUND

Development of a telmisartan-based suppression test may facilitate the diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA) in cats, which remains difficult today.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a telmisartan suppression test (TST) that is safe, and able to suppress aldosterone secretion in healthy cats but not in cats with PHA.

ANIMALS

Ten healthy cats and 6 cats with PHA.

METHODS

Prospective study using a placebo-controlled crossover design to investigate a TST in healthy cats, and evaluation of TST in cats with PHA. Plasma aldosterone concentration, potassium concentration, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured before (T0), and 1 hour (T1) and 1.5 hours after (T1.5) PO administration of 1 mg/kg of telmisartan, 2 mg/kg of telmisartan or placebo.

RESULTS

Median age in healthy cats was 3 years old (range, 1-7). In healthy cats, a telmisartan dose of 2 mg/kg significantly decreased aldosterone concentration at T1 and T1.5 compared with T0. Placebo had no significant effect on aldosterone concentration. In cats diagnosed with PHA, a 2-mg/kg dose of telmisartan did not induce any significant change in aldosterone concentration at T1 or T1.5 compared with T0. No adverse effects of telmisartan (e.g., hyperkalemia, systemic hypotension) were observed in any cats.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The oral TST shows promise as a diagnostic test for the diagnosis of PHA in cats.

Performance of Confirmatory Tests for Diagnosing Primary Aldosteronism: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

Confirmatory tests are recommended for diagnosing primary aldosteronism, but the supporting evidence is unclear.

Methods:

We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies evaluating any guideline-recommended confirmatory test (ie, saline infusion test, salt loading test, fludrocortisone suppression test, and captopril challenge test), compared with a reference standard were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models.

Results:

Fifty-five studies were included, comprising 26 studies (3654 participants) for the recumbent saline infusion test, 4 studies (633 participants) for the seated saline infusion test, 2 studies (99 participants) for the salt loading test, 7 studies (386 participants) for the fludrocortisone suppression test, and 25 studies (2585 participants) for the captopril challenge test. Risk of bias was high, affecting more than half of studies, and across all domains. Studies with case-control sampling overestimated accuracy by 7-fold (relative diagnostic odds ratio, 7.26 [95% CI, 2.46–21.43]) and partial verification or use of inconsistent reference standards overestimated accuracy by 5-fold (5.12 [95% CI, 1.48–17.77]). There were large variations in how confirmatory tests were conducted, interpreted, and verified. Under most scenarios, confirmatory testing resulted in an excess of missed cases. The certainty of evidence underlying each test (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) was very low.

Conclusions:

Recommendations for confirmatory testing in patients with abnormal screening tests and high probability features of primary aldosteronism are based on very low-quality evidence and their routine use should be reconsidered.

The Value of Different Single or Combined Indexes of the Captopril Challenge Test in the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

The result interpretation of the captopril challenge test (CCT) for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is not standardized. Superiorities of different indexes in the CCT have not been fully investigated. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the value and influence factors of different CCT-associated indexes in the diagnosis of PA.

METHODS

We enrolled 312, 85, 179 and 97 patients in the groups of PA, essential hypertension (EH), unilateral PA (UPA) and bilateral PA (BPA), respectively. For each single index investigated, we computed diagnostic estimates including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We performed pre-specified subgroup analyses to explore influence factors. We assessed the diagnostic value of combined indexes in binary logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Post-CCT aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) (AUC = 0.8771) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) (AUC = 0.8769) showed high value in distinguishing PA from EH, and their combination (AUC = 0.937) was even superior to either alone. The diagnostic efficacy was moderately high for post-CCT aldosterone to angiotensin II ratio (AA2R) (AUC = 0.834) or plasma renin activity (PRA) (AUC = 0.795) but low for the suppression percentage of PAC (AUC = 0.679). Post-CCT PAC had a significantly higher AUC in the UPA than BPA subgroup (AUC = 0.914 vs 0.827, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

We can take post-CCT ARR and PAC altogether into account to distinguish PA from EH, while caution should be taken to interpret CCT results with the suppression percentage of PAC. Post-CCT PAC may perform better to identify the unilateral than bilateral form of PA.

Diagnostic Role of Captopril Challenge Test in Korean Subjects with High Aldosterone-to-Renin Ratios

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) begins with aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) measurement followed by confirmative tests. However, the ARR has high false positive rates which led to unnecessary confirmatory tests. Captopril challenge test (CCT) has been used as one of confirmatory tests, but the accuracy of it in the diagnosis of PA is still controversial. We aimed to examine the clinical efficacy of CCT as a post-screening test in PA.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we enrolled subjects with suspected PA who had hypertension and ARR >20 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/hr). Sixty-four patients who underwent both the saline infusion test and the CCT were included.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) post-CCT was greater than that of ARR post-CCT and ARR pre-CCT in PA (area under the curve=0.956, 0.797, and 0.748, respectively; P=0.001). A cut-off value of 13 ng/dL showed the highest diagnostic odds ratio considering PAC post-CCT at 60 and 90 minutes. A PAC post-CCT of 19 ng/dL had a specificity of 100%, which can be used as a cut-off value for the confirmative test. Determining the diagnostic performance of PAC post-CCT at 90 minutes was sufficient for PA diagnosis. Subjects with PAC post-CCT at 90 minutes <13 ng/dL are less likely to have PA, and those with PAC post-CCT at 90 minutes ≥13 but <19 ng/dL should undergo secondary confirmatory tests.

CONCLUSION

The CCT test may be a reliable post-screening test to avoid the hospitalization in the setting of falsely elevated ARR screening tests.