Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients With Stage I Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of a Subset of the Japanese Radiological Society Multi-Institutional SBRT Study Group Database

Lung Cancer Therapy: The Role of Personalized Medicine

Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer worldwide, exhibiting the highest incidence rate among all cancer types. Poor outcomes often characterize this cancer as it is commonly diagnosed in advanced stages due to its unspecific symptoms. After diagnosis, the therapeutic choice is a crucial stage that profoundly affects patients' survival. Treatment choices for lung cancer must be made carefully, acknowledging the histological type and genetic characteristics of the tumor. Non-small cell lung cancer, the most common and complex type, has a high mutational burden, making next-generation sequencing (NGS) essential for identifying specific mutations and guiding treatment. With several approved targeted therapies already available, this approach highlights the critical role of personalized medicine in lung cancer care. Despite the current therapeutic pipeline, research trying to develop new tailored drugs considering individual patient characteristics has evolved over the years. This article aims to outline the current therapeutic approach for each type of lung cancer and present the latest insights into emerging therapies, highlighting the role of personalized medicine in enhancing treatment outcomes and improving patients' quality of life.

Robotic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Results of an Interim Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Surgery is the primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer. Patients with medically inoperable lung carcinomas and patients who refuse to undergo surgery are treated with definite radiotherapy. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a compelling non-invasive therapeutic modality for this group of patients that confers promising results.

METHODS

We report an interim analysis of an ongoing trial. Eighty-one patients with medically inoperable early-stage (T1,2N0) lung cancer underwent SABR in our institution. SABR was delivered via the CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system. The endpoints of the analysis were treatment efficacy and tolerance.

RESULTS

There were no acute or late toxicities from the skin or the connective tissue of the thorax. A grade 2/3 lung injury of non-clinical significance was noted in 6% of patients, which was directly related to a higher biologically effective dose (BEDα/β = 3) and larger irradiation lung volumes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. A local control (LC) was achieved in 100% of the patients at the first follow-up, and the projected 24-month local progression-free survival (LPFS) rate was 95%. The projected 24-month disease-specific overall survival (OS) was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

High LC and OS rates can be achieved with SABR for early-stage lung cancer, with minimal toxicity. This study continues to recruit patients.

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

Progress in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor that is prone to spread extensively. Compared to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC treatment progresses slowly. Although SCLC is highly sensitive to chemotherapy during the initial treatment, most patients still experience resistance and recurrence after receiving chemotherapy. A meta-analysis demonstrated that thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) improves overall survival in SCLC. The results of the CALGB and CONVERT trials provide evidence for the efficacy of once-daily high-dose TRT. TRT at 60 Gy administered twice daily significantly improved survival without increasing toxicity. The long-standing debate over the optimal timing of radiotherapy has not been fully resolved. SBRT has excellent local control rates and is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with stage I or II SCLC. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is used to reduce treatment-related neurotoxicity to the extent that there has been a recent discussion on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring can replace PCI. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improves the survival rate of patients with NSCLC; however, its clinical effectiveness has not been systematically explored in patients with SCLC. Therefore, we summarize the evolving therapeutic strategies, (TRT for limited stage-SCLC and consolidative TRT for extensive stage-SCLC) and improved radiotherapy techniques (role of SBRT in stage I or II node-negative SCLC, progress of PCI, and stereotactic radiosurgery), and discuss the possibilities and prospects of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for SCLC.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Very Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (VLS-SCLC)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumour with metastatic propensity. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging therapeutic option for SCLC, despite limited supporting evidence. By evaluating the use of SBRT in very limited stage (VLS) SCLC at our institution, we aimed to contribute to the existing knowledge in this area while establishing a basis for further research. We performed a retrospective review of all cases of VLS-SCLC treated with SBRT between 2013 and 2020. Baseline demographics, diagnostic, and treatment information were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). We identified 46 patients with pathologically confirmed VLS-SCLC; 25 were treated with SBRT, and the remainder received either surgery, conventional radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or palliative-intent therapy. After a median follow-up of 23.7 months, 44% of the patients had died; the median OS was of 24.4 months for the SBRT cohort and 67.0 months for the curative intent non-SBRT cohort. The difference in disease recurrence and survival between cohorts was underpowered and not statistically significant. Higher baseline ECOG and comorbidity was noted in the SBRT cohort.

New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer

The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are recommended for patients with inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with both offering promising results. However, it is largely unknown which of these two treatment modalities provides superior benefits for patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes and safety between SBRT and RFA in patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

Eligible studies published between 2001 and 2020 were obtained through a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Original English-language studies on the treatment of early-stage NSCLC with SBRT or RFA were included. Local control (LC) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and adverse events were obtained by pooled analyses.

Results

Eighty-seven SBRT studies (12,811 patients) and 18 RFA studies (1,535 patients) met the eligibility criteria. For SBRT, the LC rates (with 95% confidence intervals) at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98% (97-98%), 95% (95-96%), 92% (91-93%), and 92% (91-93%), respectively, which were significantly higher than those for RFA [75% (69-82%), 31% (22-39%), 67% (58-76%), and 41% (30-52%), respectively] (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in short-term OS between SBRT and RFA [1-year OS rate: 87% (86-88%) versus 89% (88-91%), P=0.07; 2-year OS rate: 71% (69-72%) versus 69% (64-74%), P=0.42]. Regarding long-term OS, the 3- and 5-year OS rates for SBRT were 58% (56-59%) and 39% (37-40%), respectively, which were significantly (P<0.01) superior to those for RFA [48% (45-51%) and 21% (19-23%), respectively]. The most common complication of SBRT was radiation pneumonitis (grade ≥2), making up 9.1% of patients treated with SBRT, while pneumothorax was the most common complication of RFA, making up 27.2% of patients treated with RFA.

Discussion

Compared with RFA, SBRT has superior LC and long-term OS rates but similar short-term OS rates. Prospective randomized trials with large sample sizes comparing the efficacy of SBRT and RFA are warranted.

Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is used to treat inoperable early-stage, node-negative small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on SABR for T1-2N0M0 SCLC to summarize outcomes including local control (LC), overall survival (OS), recurrence rates, and toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE (inception to April 2021) was conducted. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extracted study-level data. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 3.6.2) at a significance threshold of 0.05.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified in the systematic review and seven (399 patients) were selected for meta-analysis. Inoperability was noted as the indication for SABR in 94% (75-100%) of patients. Median follow-up and tumor size were 19.5 months (11.9-32) and 24 mm (19-29), respectively. Chemotherapy and PCI use rates were 44.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-61.9%) and 13.8% (95% CI, 0.4-41.2%), respectively. Local control was 97.3% (95% CI, 92.3-99.8%) at 1 year and 95.7% (95% CI, 74.2-100.0%) at 2 years. Overall survival was 86.3% (95% CI, 74.4-94.9%) at 1 year and 63.7% (95% CI, 45.7-79.9%) at 2 years. Nodal and distant recurrence rates were 17.8% (95% CI, 7.5-31.2%) and 26.9% (95% CI, 7.4-53.0%), respectively. The rates of grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 toxicity (CTCAE) were 12.6% (95% CI, 6.7-19.9%), 6.7% (95% CI, 3.3-11.2%), and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.0-5.3%), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 events were observed across the studies.

CONCLUSION

SABR for inoperable early-stage, node-negative SCLC is locally effective with limited toxicity. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate the role of SABR for patients at higher risk of toxicity with surgery or combined chemoradiation.

12 × 6 Gy stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors. Is there a difference in response between lung metastases and primary bronchial carcinoma?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term tumor control after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with 12 × 6 Gy of patients with primary bronchial carcinoma (BC) or with pulmonary metastases (MET) of various solid tumors. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors were compared.

METHODS

Between May 2012 and January 2020, 168 patients with 206 pulmonary lesions (170 MET and 36 primary BC) were treated with 12 × 6 Gy (BED₁₀ 116 Gy). The irradiated pulmonary MET were from the following cancers: 47 (27.6%) head and neck, 37 (21.8%) rectum or colon, 30 (17.6%) bronchial, 13 (7.6%) malignant melanoma, 9 (5.3%) esophageal, 9 (5.3%) sarcoma, and 25 (14.8%) other.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 16.26 months (range: 0.46-89.34) for BC and 19.18 months (0.89-91.11) for MET. Survival rates at 3 years were: OS 43% for BC and 35% for MET; LPFS BC 96% and MET 85%; PFS BC 35% and MET 29%. The most frequently observed grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were pneumonitis (5.9% BC, 4.8% MET), pulmonary fibrosis (2.9% BC, 4% MET), and pulmonary embolism (2.9% BC, 0.8% MET). The favorable prognostic effects on overall survival of patients with MET were female gender (log-rank: p < 0.001), no systemic progression (log-rank; p = 0.048, multivariate COX regression p = 0.039), and malignant melanoma histology (log-rank; p = 0.015, multivariate COX regression p = 0.020). For patients with BC, it was tumor location within the lower lobe (vs. upper lobe, log-rank p = 0.027). LPFS of patients with metastatic disease was beneficially influenced by female gender (log-rank: p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The treatment concept of 12 × 6 Gy is associated with 96% local progression-free survival for BC and 85% for pulmonary metastases after 3 years. There was no difference in response after SRT of primary lung carcinoma or pulmonary metastases.

Efficacy of continuous i.v. infusion of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to observe the efficacy of continuous i.v. infusion of Recombinant Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Inhibitor (rhVEGI) in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer (ALC).

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with ALC treated at our hospital between November 2018 and May 2020 were divided into two groups of 43 patients each according to a random number table. The control group (CG) was treated with routine chemotherapy, and the experimental group (EG) was treated with continuous i.v. Infusion of rhVEGI plus chemotherapy. The two groups were compared in terms of clinical efficacy, toxic side effects, immune function (T-lymphocyte subsets CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD4⁺/CD8⁺), changes in neovascular parameters (serum bFGF, VEGF, MMP-9), quality of life, and survival rate within 6 months between two groups.

RESULTS

The response rate (81.40%) was higher in the EG (60.47%) than in the CG (P<0.05). After treatment, CD4⁺ and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ increased in both groups, while CD8⁺, serum bFGF, VEGF, and MMP-9 levels decreased, and the improvement in the EG was better than that in the CG (P<0.05). Three months after treatment, all quality of life scores increased in both groups, and were higher in the EG than in the CG (P<0.05). The mortality rate (32.56%) was lower in the EG (32.56%) than in the CG (67.44%) (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous i.v. infusion of rhVEGI combined with chemotherapy can effectively enhance clinical treatment efficacy, inhibit tumor cell growth, improve immune function, reduce mortality, and improve quality of life without increasing adverse effects in patients with ALC.

Radiofrequency ablation vs. stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in nonsurgical patients

Background: Approximately 20% resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are treated non-surgically due to various reasons. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with stage IA NSCLC who were ineligible for surgery using the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results (SEER) Database.

Methods: Using the SEER registry, we identified a total of 6,195 IA NSCLC patients who received SBRT or RFA between 2004 and 2015 because of ineligibility for surgical resection due to various reasons. Complete clinical information was available in all these patients. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between RFA and SBRT groups by using propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), and overlap weighting analysis. Additionally, an exploratory analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of RFA treatment based on the subsets of clinically relevant patients.

Results: Of the 6,195 nonsurgical IA NSCLC patients, 191 patients (3.1%) received RFA and the other 6,004 patients (96.9%) received SBRT. The one-, three- and five-year OS in the unmatched RFA and SBRT groups were 83.3%, 48.5%and 29.1% vs. 83.8%, 48.3% and 27.4%, respectively, there was similar results in the PSM, IPTW, overlap weighing analysis. Nonsurgical IA NSCLC patients receiving RFA seemed to have better five-year survival than those receiving SBRT, though the difference was not statistically significant (OS, HR; 0.986; 95% CI, 0.827-1.175, P=0.8738; CSS, HR; 0.965; 95% CI, 0.765-1.219, P=0.7663). We found that the odds of receiving RFA decreased with larger tumor size (>2, <3 cm, OR; 0.303; 95% CI, 0.191-0.479; >3 cm, OR; 0.153; 95% CI, 0.093-0.251) compared with tumor size <1 cm. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving RFA seemed to have better OS than those receiving SBRT, though the difference was not statistically significant. This specific trend was even more obvious in patients with tumors <1cm in diameter (P=0.1577).

Conclusion: In comparison with SBRT, RFA did not seem to adversely affect CSS and OS of IA NSCLC patients who were not suitable for surgical treatment. In addition, RFA seemed to offer better survival to IA NSCLC patients, especially those with tumors <1 cm.

Safety and utility of performing CT-guided biopsies of pulmonary lesions that arise after radiotherapy

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and usefulness of performing computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies of pulmonary lesions that arise after radiotherapy. Seventeen patients (14 males and 3 females; median age: 69 years, range: 48-84 years) underwent CT-guided biopsies of pulmonary lesions that occurred in lung regions that had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Three patients underwent CT-guided biopsies twice, and thus, the total number of procedures was 20. We reviewed the subjects' medical records and images, and evaluated the rate for obtaining pathological diagnosis with the biopsy sample, subsequent clinical course, and complications associated with the procedure. In 19 of 20 procedures (95%), the CT-guided biopsy resulted in a pathological diagnosis being obtained. In 14 procedures, the pathological results were consistent with the patients' clinical courses. In the remaining 5 procedures, the lesions were pathologically diagnosed as benign, but they increased in size thereafter; so the lesions were considered to be clinically malignant. The results were considered to represent sampling errors. There were 3 minor complications (slight pneumothorax which did not require drainage) (3/20, 15%), and there were no major complications. In conclusion, performing CT-guided biopsies of pulmonary lesions that arise after radiotherapy appears to be feasible, safe and useful.

The current role of surgery and SBRT in early stage of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Early stage small cell lung cancer (T1-2N0M0SCLC) represents 7% of all SCLC. The standard treatment in patients with intrathoracic SCLC disease is the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Nowadays, the recommended management of this highly selected group is surgical resection due to favorable survival outcomes. For medically inoperable patients or those who refuse surgery, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1-2N0SCLC, transferring the favorable experience obtained on inoperable NSCLC (Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer). In the era of multimodality treatment, adjuvant systemic therapy plays an important role even in the management of early SCLC, increasing the disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The benefit of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI), that currently has a Category I recommendation for localized stage SLCL, remains controversial in this selected subgroup of patients due to the lower risk of brain metastasis.

AIM

This review summarizes the most relevant data on the local management of T1-2N0M0SCLC (surgery and radiotherapy), and evaluates the relevance of adjuvant treatment.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Provides a critical evaluation of best current clinical management options for T1-2N0M0 SCLC.

4D CT analysis of organs at risk (OARs) in stereotactic radiotherapy

Internal organs at risk volumes (IRV) represent the propagation of organs at risk (OARs) in 4DCT. Sixty consecutive patients that underwent 4DCT for thoracic stereotactic radiotherapy were analyzed and IRVs for heart, trachea, esophagus, bronchial tree, great vessels, and spinal cord were calculated. IRVs were then tested for the respect of dose constraints. IRVs were significantly bigger than standard OARs (p-value <0.001 for all the IRVs). IRVs that did not respect the dose constraints were, respectively, 7/60 (11.7%) for Heart IRV, 6/60 (10%) for Esophagus IRV, 11/60 (18.3%) for Trachea IRV, 16/60 (26.6%) for Bronchial Tree and 0/60 (0%) for great vessel and spinal cord IRV. In the subset of central targets, the percentage of plans that can be unacceptable taking into consideration OARs motion reaches 42%. The correlation of IRVs with clinical parameters and toxicity deserves future investigations in prospective trials.

Current and future strategies in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 13% of all lung tumors. The standard treatment in patients with limited-stage (LS) disease is thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with chemotherapy. In extensive-stage (ES) SCLC, the importance of consolidation TRT in patients with a good treatment response has become increasingly recognized. In both LS and ES disease, prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended in patients who respond to treatment. New therapeutic approaches such as immunotherapy are being increasingly incorporated into the treatment of SCLC, although more slowly than in non-small cell lung cancer. Diverse radiation dose and fractionation schemes, administered in varying combinations with these new drugs, are being investigated. In the present article, we review and update the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of SCLC. We also discuss the main clinical trials currently underway to identify future trends.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Radiotherapy is a critical component of multimodality treatment of SCLC. This article can help physicians to improve medical knowledge and find better ways to treat their SCLC patients.

CSC Radioresistance: A Therapeutic Challenge to Improve Radiotherapy Effectiveness in Cancer

Radiotherapy (RT) is a modality of oncologic treatment that can be used to treat approximately 50% of all cancer patients either alone or in combination with other treatment modalities such as surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and therapeutic targeting. Despite the technological advances in RT, which allow a more precise delivery of radiation while progressively minimizing the impact on normal tissues, issues like radioresistance and tumor recurrence remain important challenges. Tumor heterogeneity is responsible for the variation in the radiation response of the different tumor subpopulations. A main factor related to radioresistance is the presence of cancer stem cells (CSC) inside tumors, which are responsible for metastases, relapses, RT failure, and a poor prognosis in cancer patients. The plasticity of CSCs, a process highly dependent on the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and associated to cell dedifferentiation, complicates the identification and eradication of CSCs and it might be involved in disease relapse and progression after irradiation. The tumor microenvironment and the interactions of CSCs with their niches also play an important role in the response to RT. This review provides a deep insight into the characteristics and radioresistance mechanisms of CSCs and into the role of CSCs and tumor microenvironment in both the primary tumor and metastasis in response to radiation, and the radiobiological principles related to the CSC response to RT. Finally, we summarize the major advances and clinical trials on the development of CSC-based therapies combined with RT to overcome radioresistance. A better understanding of the potential therapeutic targets for CSC radiosensitization will provide safer and more efficient combination strategies, which in turn will improve the live expectancy and curability of cancer patients.

Difference in Acquired Radioresistance Induction Between Repeated Photon and Particle Irradiation

In recent years, advanced radiation therapy techniques, including stereotactic body radiotherapy and carbon–ion radiotherapy, have progressed to such an extent that certain types of cancer can be treated with radiotherapy alone. The therapeutic outcomes are particularly promising for early stage lung cancer, with results matching those of surgical resection. Nevertheless, patients may still experience local tumor recurrence, which might be exacerbated by the acquisition of radioresistance after primary radiotherapy. Notwithstanding the risk of tumors acquiring radioresistance, secondary radiotherapy is increasingly used to treat recurrent tumors. In this context, it appears essential to comprehend the radiobiological effects of repeated photon and particle irradiation and their underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms in order to achieve the most favorable therapeutic outcome. However, to date, the mechanisms of acquisition of radioresistance in cancer cells have mainly been studied after repeated in vitro X-ray irradiation. By contrast, other critical aspects of radioresistance remain mostly unexplored, including the response to carbon-ion irradiation of X-ray radioresistant cancer cells, the mechanisms of acquisition of carbon-ion resistance, and the consequences of repeated in vivo X-ray or carbon-ion irradiation. In this review, we discuss the underlying mechanisms of acquisition of X-ray and carbon-ion resistance in cancer cells, as well as the phenotypic differences between X-ray and carbon-ion-resistant cancer cells, the biological implications of repeated in vivo X-ray or carbon-ion irradiation, and the main open questions in the field.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for early-stage small cell lung cancer

Purpose

This study was designed to compare survival outcomes for non-surgically managed T1-T2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Methods

The was queried between 2004-2015 for patients with T1-T2N0M0 SCLC. Patients must have been treated with curative intent SBRT or CFRT (delivered daily or twice daily, 45-70 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). A subset analysis of patient receiving chemotherapy was also performed. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare OS among patients who received chemotherapy.

Results

We evaluated 1378 patients in the general cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis(MVA) in the general cohort revealed that SBRT was significantly associated with improved survival (HR 0.68, p<0.001) along with receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.63, p <0.001). SBRT patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy compared to CFRT patients (p<0.01). In the chemotherapy subset, of 1096 patients, on MVA, there was a trend in favor of the SBRT group (HR 0.73; p=0.06). A 3:1 PSM analysis on the chemotherapy subset found similar results on MVA with a trend in favor of SBRT (p=0.06).

Conclusion

Patients with T1-2N0M0 SCLC treated with SBRT regimens incorporating chemotherapy had comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy using standard fractionation. Treatment paradigms for T1-2N0M0 SCLC incorporating SBRT warrant further exploration and should incorporate chemotherapy.