Evaluation of Integral Dose in Cranio-spinal Axis (CSA) Irradiation with Conventional and Helical Delivery

Helical tomotherapy craniospinal irradiation in primary brain tumours: Toxicities and outcomes in a peadiatric and adult population

Objective

As craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is delivered more frequently by helical tomotherapy (HT) with few reports about late effects, we analysed all patients treated in our centre over an 11-year period.

Methods and materials

Our study included all patients that underwent CSI by HT, between September 2009 and January 2020, in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Toulouse Cancer Institute. Acute radiotherapy toxicities were reported and medium- to long-term outcomes analysed.

Results

Among the 79 patients included, 70.9 % were younger than 18 years at diagnosis, the median age was 13 (range: 1-52) at the time of radiation therapy, 67.1 % of patients had medulloblastoma. Half of them (49.4 %) had a metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median dose of CSI was 36 Gy (range, 18-36). Seventy-seven patients received a radiation boost to the original location of the primary tumour (97.5 %), 32 patients also received a boost to their metastatic sites (40.5 %). Median follow-up was 55.5 months (95 %CI = [41.2; 71.8]). The 3-year event-free survival rate was 66.3 % (95 %CI = [54.2; 75.9]). Most patients presented with acute haematological toxicities during CSI (85.9 %), predominantly severe thrombocytopenia (39.7 %). Among the 64 patients assessed for medium- and long-term outcomes, 52 survived and 47 were alive and disease-free at the latest follow-up visit on record. There were 3.8 % secondary tumours: two meningiomas and one diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Adult and paediatric patients respectively presented with secondary cataract (4.3 % vs 22.0 %), persistent hearing disorders (26.1 % vs 29.3 %), pulmonary or cardiac late effects (4.3 % vs 2.4 %), hormonal pituitary gland deficiencies (30.0 % vs 56.8 %) and psycho-cognitive disorders (56.5 % vs 53.7 %).

Conclusion

CSI dispensed by HT, did not result in any additional acute or late toxicities when compared to 3D-CSI. There was no increase in the secondary tumour rate compared to that reported in the literature.

Tomotherapy for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation

•

Tomotherapy is safe and effective for cranio-spinal irradiation, both in paediatric patients and in adults, with similar disease-specific outcomes and toxicities as other techniques such as 3DCRT or IMRT/VMAT.

•

Tomotherapy offers several technical advantages when compared to other radiotherapy techniques such as higher target conformity and better dose homogeneity.

•

Helical Tomotherapy provides good organ-at-risk sparing for several structures, especially the vertebrae, parotids, and optic system.

•

Reported treatment time/ beam-on-time is longer with helical Tomotherapy compared to other techniques.

Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) using Tomotherapy and offers a comprehensive comparison between Tomotherapy and other radiotherapy delivery techniques. Databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the keywords “tomotherapy” AND “craniospinal”. Fifty-six papers were included in the review. Patient population was adult in 9 papers, paediatric in 26 papers and mixed in 14 papers. Patients treated with helical Tomotherapy had similar disease-specific clinical outcomes and toxicities as patients treated using other techniques. Compared to any other technique, Tomotherapy provides better target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity in 23, 34 and 22 reports. Tomotherapy showed better organ-at-risk sparing for the thyroid, parotids, cochlea, eyes, heart and esophagus. Beam-On-Time (BOT) was reported to be longer for Tomotherapy in most studies (Median BOT: HT = 11 min, VMAT = 5.49 min, 3DCRT = 1.46 min). In conclusion, Tomotherapy offers good cranio-spinal axis coverage with improved homogeneity and conformity compared to other techniques, but with a considerably longer treatment time. Clinical outcome and toxicities suggest using Tomotherapy for CSI is efficient and safe.

Toxicity Reduction after Craniospinal Irradiation via Helical Tomotherapy in Patients with Medulloblastoma: A Unicentric Retrospective Analysis

Objectives: Recent trials with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) via helical Tomotherapy (HT) demonstrated encouraging medulloblastoma results. In this study, we assess the toxicity profile of different radiation techniques and estimate survival rates. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 46 patients who underwent irradiation for medulloblastoma between 1999 and 2019 (27 conventional radiotherapy technique (CRT) and 19 HT). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes-local control rate (LCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS)-were reviewed. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) criteria. Results: In total, 43 courses of CSI and three local RT were administered to the 46 patients: 30 were male, the median age was 7 years (range 1-56). A median total RT dose of 55 Gy (range 44-68) and a median CSI dose of 35 Gy (range, 23.4-40) was delivered. During follow-up (median, 99 months), six patients (13%) developed recurrence. The EFS rate after 5 years was 84%. The overall OS rates after 5 and 10 years were 95% and 88%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Following HT, a trend towards lower grade 2/3 acute upper gastrointestinal (p = 0.07) and subacute CNS (p = 0.05) toxicity rates was detected compared to CRT-group. The risk of late CNS toxicities, mainly grade 2/3, was significantly lower following HT technique (p = 0.003). Conclusion: CSI via HT is an efficacious treatment modality in medulloblastoma patients. In all, we detected a reduced rate of several acute, subacute, and chronic toxicities following HT compared to CRT.

Implementation of a DVH Registry to provide constraints and continuous quality monitoring for pediatric CSI treatment planning

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is a complex radiation therapy technique that is used for patients, often children and teenagers/young adults, with tumors that have a propensity to spread throughout the central nervous system such as medulloblastoma. CSI is associated with important long‐term side effects, the risk of which may be affected by numerous factors including radiation modality and technique. Lack of standardization for a technique that is used even in larger radiation oncology departments only a few times each year may be one such factor and the current ad hoc manner of planning new CSI patients may be greatly improved by implementing a dose–volume histogram registry (DVHR) to use previous patient data to facilitate prospective constraint guidance for organs at risk. In this work, we implemented a DVHR and used it to provide standardized constraints for CSI planning. Mann–Whitney U tests and mean differences at 95% confidence intervals were used to compare two cohorts (pre‐ and post‐DVHR intervention) at specific dosimetric points to determine if observed improvements in standardization were statistically significant. Through this approach, we have shown that the implementation of dosimetric constraints based on DVHR‐derived data helped improve the standardization of pediatric CSI planning at our center. The DVHR also provided guidance for a change in CSI technique, helping to achieve practice standardization across TomoTherapy and IMRT.

Prospective study on dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and 3DCRT for craniospinal irradiation - A single institution experience

AIM

This prospective study aims to assess feasibility of helical tomotherapy (HT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and perform dosimetric comparison of treatment plans for both HT and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).

BACKGROUND

CSI is a challenging procedure. Large PTV size requires field matching due to technical limitations of standard linear accelerators, which cannot irradiate such volumes as a single field. HT could help to avoid these limitations as irradiation of long fields is possible without field matching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three adults were enrolled from 2009 to 2010. All patients received radiochemotherapy. Treatment plans in prone position for 3DCRT and in supine position for HT were generated. The superior plan was used for patients' irradiation. Plans were compared with the application of DVH, Dx parameters - where x represents a percentage of the structure volume receiving a normalized dose and homogeneity index (HI).

RESULTS

All patients received HT irradiation. The treatment was well tolerated. The HT plans resulted in a better dose coverage and uniformity in the PTV: HI were 5.4, 7.8, 6.8 for HT vs. 10.3, 6.6, 10.4 for 3DCRT. For most organs at risk (OARs), the D(V80) was higher for HT than for 3DCRT, whereas D(V5) was lower for HT.

CONCLUSIONS

HT is feasible for CSI, and in comparison with 3DCRT it improves PTV coverage. HT reduces high dose volumes of OARs, but larger volumes of normal tissue receive low radiation dose. HT requires further study to establish correlations between dosimetrical findings and clinical outcomes, especially with regard to late sequelae of treatment.

A feasibility study using TomoDirect for craniospinal irradiation

The feasibility of delivering craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with TomoDirect is investigated. A method is proposed to generate TomoDirect plans using standard three‐dimensional (3D) beam arrangements on Tomotherapy with junctioning of these fields to minimize hot or cold spots at the cranial/spinal junction. These plans are evaluated and compared to a helical Tomotherapy and a three‐dimensional conformal therapy (3D CRT) plan delivered on a conventional linear accelerator (linac) for CSI. The comparison shows that a TomoDirect plan with an overlap between the cranial and spinal fields might be preferable over Tomotherapy plans because of decreased low dose to large volumes of normal tissues outside of the planning target volume (PTV). Although the TomoDirect plans were not dosimetrically superior to a 3D CRT linac plan, the patient can be easily treated in the supine position, which is often more comfortable and efficient from an anesthesia standpoint. TomoDirect plans also have only one setup position which obviates the need for matching of fields and feathering of junctions, two issues encountered with conventional 3D CRT plans. TomoDirect plans can be delivered with comparable treatment times to conventional 3D plans and in shorter times than a Tomotherapy plan. In this paper, a method is proposed for creating TomoDirect craniospinal plans, and the dosimetric consequences for choosing different planning parameters are discussed.

PACS number: 87.55.D‐

Helical tomotherapy in children and adolescents: dosimetric comparisons, opportunities and issues

Helical Tomotherapy (HT) is a highly conformal image-guided radiation technique, introduced into clinical routine in 2006 at the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano (Italy). With this new technology, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is delivered using a helicoidal method. Here we present our dosimetric experiences using HT in 100 children, adolescents and young adults treated from May 2006 to February 2011. The median age of the patients was 13 years (range 1-24). The most common treated site was the central nervous system (50; of these, 24 were craniospinal irradiations), followed by thorax (22), head and neck (10), abdomen and pelvis (11), and limbs (7). The use of HT was calculated in accordance to the target dose conformation, the target size and shape, the dose to critical organs adjacent to the target, simultaneous treatment of multiple targets, and re-irradiation. HT has demonstrated to improve target volume dose homogeneity and the sparing of critical structures, when compared to 3D Linac-based radiotherapy (RT). In standard cases this technique represented a comparable alternative to IMRT delivered with conventional linear accelerator. In certain cases (e.g., craniospinal and pleural treatments) only HT generated adequate treatment plans with good target volume coverage. However, the gain in target conformality should be balanced with the spread of low-doses to distant areas. This remains an open issue for the potential risk of secondary malignancies (SMNs) and longer follow-up is mandatory.

Junctioning longitudinally adjacent PTVs with Helical TomoTherapy

Irradiation of longitudinally adjacent PTVs with Helical TomoTherapy (HT) may be clinically necessary, for example in treating a recurrent PTV adjacent to a previously-treated volume. In this work, the parameters which influence the cumulative dose distribution resulting from treating longitudinally adjacent PTVs are examined, including field width, pitch, and PTV location. In-phantom dose distributions were calculated for various on- and off-axis cylindrical PTVs and were verified by ion chamber and film measurement. Dose distributions were calculated to cover 95% of the PTV by the prescribed dose (DP) using 25 and 50 mm long HT fields with pitches of either 0.3 or 0.45. These dose distributions where then used to calculate the 3D dose distribution in the junction region between two PTVs. The best junction uniformity was obtained for fields of equal width, with larger fields providing better intra-PTV dose homogeneity than smaller fields. Junctioning fields of different widths resulted in a much larger dose inhomogeneity, but this could be improved significantly by dividing the junction end of the PTV treated with the smaller field into multiple (up to 4) sub-PTVs, with the prescribed dose in each sub-PTV decreasing with proximity to the junction region. This provided a PTV matching with dose homogeneity similar to that achieved when junctioning two PTVs, both irradiated by the 50 mm field, and provided a distribution where 95% of the PTV received at least the prescribed dose, with maximum excursions from prescribed dose varying from -19% to +13%. We conclude that junctioning adjacent PTVs is possible. Treating longitudinally adjacent PTVs with different widths is a challenge, but dose uniformity is improved by breaking PTVs into multiple contiguous sub-PTVs modified to feather (broaden) the effective junctioning region.

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiosurgery and helical tomotherapy for the treatment of multiple intracranial metastases

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetry of single fraction, single-isocenter intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) plans for multiple intracranial metastases and to compare Helical Tomotherapy (HT). Ten treatment plans with 3-6 brain metastases treated with IMRS were re-planned with HT. The mean number of lesions was 5 and mean PTV 22 cm(3). The prescribed dose was 16-20 Gy. The mean V100% was similar for IMRS and HT, and the mean conformity index was 1.4, mean Paddick confirmity index was 0.7, and mean MDPD was 1.1 for both. The mean gradient index was similar for both. The mean 50% _isodose volume was 179.2 cm(3) for IMRS and 277.0 cm(3) for HT (p=0.01). The mean maximum doses to organs at risk were lower for IMRS except brainstem and right optic nerve. For brain, the integral dose was 5.1 and 6.8 Gy-kg (p<0.001) and mean dose 4.0 and 5.4 Gy (p<0.001) for IMRS and HT, respectively. The mean treatment times were 23 (IMRS) and 41 (HT) minutes. Conformity and homogeneity indices were equivalent and sparing of the organs at risk was clinically acceptable for both IMRS and HT. Though the gradient index was similar for IMRS and HT, the mean 50% isodose volume and integral dose to normal brain were lower for IMRS as was treatment time.

The history of ependymoma management

INTRODUCTION

The ependymomas are relatively not a common tumor. However, most clinicians agree that the radical removal of the tumor is the most important prognostic factor.

MORBIDITY OF TREATMENT

Tumor removal was not sufficient before the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and resulted in a considerable operative morbidity and mortality. As the microneurosurgical techniques and microsurgical anatomy become popular and the MRI provide more detailed anatomical information preoperatively, radical removal of this complex and complicated tumor can be more feasible. In childhood ependymoma, the treatment-related morbidity and mortality can be the special issues, which can modify the policy of management safe tumor removal and minimal adjuvant treatment, which are extremely important.

RADIATION THERAPY

Radiation treatment has been the option for disseminated disease and residual tumor. With the advancement of detailed MR anatomical information, safer and more delicate radiation becomes possible with newer radiation modalities, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulating radiotherapy, and tomotherapy.

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

Although many clinicians believe that the ependymomas are inheritably chemoresistant, the new targets for the treatment are under investigation or clinically tried. Also, the genetic alterations of ependymoma are developing and might be a promising target.

CONCLUSION

The surgical techniques and assistant modalities for tumor removal are still advancing. So, the outcome of ependymoma is still improving. Unfortunately, newer treatment modalities, such as new chemotherapeutic agent and gene modification agent, are still not promising. The history of ependymoma management is still in progress.

High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy

This study aimed to establish the feasibility of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in craniospinal irradiation (CSI) using conventional linear accelerator (IMRT_LA) and compare it dosimetrically with helical TomoTherapy (IMRT_Tomo) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). CT datasets of four previously treated patients with medulloblastoma were used to generate 3DCRT, IMRT_LA and IMRT_Tomo plans. A CSI dose of 35 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). IMRT_LA plans for tall patients were generated using an intensity feathering technique. All plans were compared dosimetrically using standardised parameters. The mean volume of each PTV receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V(95%)) was >98% for all plans. All plans resulted in a comparable dose homogeneity index (DHI) for PTV_brain. For PTV_spine, IMRT_Tomo achieved the highest mean DHI of 0.96, compared with 0.91 for IMRT_LA and 0.84 for 3DCRT. The best dose conformity index was achieved by IMRT_Tomo for PTV_brain (0.96) and IMRT_LA for PTV_spine (0.83). The IMRT_Tomo plan was superior in terms of reduction of the maximum, mean and integral doses to almost all organs at risk (OARs). It also reduced the volume of each OAR irradiated to various dose levels, except for the lowest dose volume. The beam-on time was significantly longer in IMRT_Tomo. In conclusion, IMRT_Tomo for CSI is technically easier and potentially dosimetrically favourable compared with IMRT_LA and 3DCRT. IMRT for CSI can also be realised on a conventional linear accelerator even for spinal lengths exceeding maximum allowable field sizes. The longer beam-on time in IMRT_Tomo raises concerns about intrafraction motion and whole-body integral doses.

Pediatric medulloblastoma: toxicity of current treatment and potential role of protontherapy

Post-operative craniospinal irradiation and systemic chemotherapy are both necessary in the treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma. Late toxicity is a major problem in long term survivors and significantly affects their quality of life. We have systematically reviewed the literature to examine data on late toxicity, specifically focusing on: endocrine function, growth and bone development, neurocognitive development, second cancers, ototoxicity, gynecological toxicity and health of the offspring, cardiac toxicity and pulmonary toxicity. In this paper, we describe qualitatively the kind of detected side effects and, whenever possible, try to assess their incidence and the relative role of craniospinal irradiation (as opposed to other treatments and to the disease itself) in producing them. Subsequently we examine the possible approach to reduce unwanted effects from craniospinal irradiation to target and non-target tissues and we consider briefly the role of hyperfractionation, tomotherapy and IMRT. We describe the characteristics of protontherapy and its potential for non-target tissues toxicity reduction reviewing the existing physical and dosimetric studies and the (still very limited) clinical experiences. Finally we propose intensity modulated spot scanning protontherapy with multiportal simultaneous optimization (IMPT) as a possible tool for dose distribution optimization within different areas of CNS and potential reduction of target tissues toxicity.

Aichi cancer center initial experience of intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer using helical tomotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of helical tomotherapy (HT) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From June 2006 to June 2007, 20 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated with HT with (n = 18) or without (n = 2) systemic chemotherapy. The primary tumor and involved lymph node (PTV1) were prescribed 70 Gy and the prophylactic region 54 Gy at D95, respectively. The majority of patients received 2 Gy per fraction for PTV1 in 35 fractions. Parotid function was evaluated using quantitative scintigraphy at pretreatment, and posttreatment at 3 months and 1 year later.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 53 years, ranging from 15 to 83. Our cohort included 5, 8, 4, 2, and 1 patients with disease Stages IIB, III, IVA, IVB, and IVC, respectively. Histopathological record revealed two for World Health Organization Type I and 18 for Type 2 or 3. The median duration time for treatment preparation was 9.5 days, and all plans were thought to be acceptable regarding dose constraints of both the planning target volume and organ at risk. All patients completed their treatment procedure of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). All patients achieved clinical remission after IMRT. The majority of patients had Grade 3 or higher toxicity of skin, mucosa, and neutropenia. At the median follow-up of 10.9 months, two patients recurred, and one patient died from cardiac disease. Parotid gland function at 1 year after completion of IMRT was significantly improved compared with that at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

HT was clinically effective in terms of IMRT planning and utility for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy versus Conventional Radiation to Deliver Craniospinal Radiation

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether helical tomotherapy would better dose-limit growing vertebral ring apophyses during craniospinal radiation as compared to conventional techniques. Four pediatric patients with M0 medulloblastoma received tomotherapy craniospinal radiation (23.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fx) by continuous helical delivery of 6 MV photons. Weekly blood counts were monitored. For comparison, conventional craniospinal radiation plans were generated. To assist in tomotherapy planning, a cross-sectional growth study of 52 children and young adults was completed to evaluate spine growth and maturation. Vertebral ring apophyses first fused along the posterolateral body-pedicle synostosis, proceeding circumferentially toward the anterior vertebral body such that the cervical and lumbar vertebrae fused early and mid-thoracic vertebrae fused late. For the four pediatric patients, tomotherapy resulted between 2% and 14% vertebral volume exceeding 23 Gy. Conventional craniospinal radiation predicted between 33% and 44% exceeding 23 Gy. Cumulative body radiation doses exceeding 4 Gy were between 50% and 57% for tomotherapy and between 25% and 37% for conventional craniospinal radiation. Tomotherapy radiation reduced neutrophil, platelet, and erythrocyte hemoglobin levels during treatment. Tomotherapy provides improved dose avoidance to growing vertebrae as compared to conventional craniospinal radiation. However, the long-term effects of tomotherapy dose avoidance on spine growth and large volume low dose radiation in children are not yet known.

Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is an advanced treatment technology for radiation therapy. There are several treatment planning systems (TPS) that can generate IMRT plans. These plans may show different inhomogeneity indices to the planning target volume (PTV) and integral dose to organs at risk (OAR). In this study, we compared clinical cases covering different anatomical treatment sites, including head and neck, brain, lung, prostate, pelvis, and cranio-spinal axis. Two treatment plans were developed for each case using Pinnacle(3) and helical tomotherapy (HT) TPS. The inhomogeneity index of the PTV and the non-tumor integral dose (NTID) were calculated and compared for each case. Despite the difference in the number of effective beams, in several cases, NTID did not increase from HT as compared to the step-and-shoot delivery method. Six helical tomotherapy treatment plans for different treatment sites have been analyzed and compared against corresponding step-and-shoot plans generated with the Pinnacle(3) planning system. Results show that HT may produce plans with smaller integral doses to healthy organs, and fairly homogeneous doses to the target as compared to linac-based step-and-shoot IMRT planning in special treatment site such as cranio-spinal.

Retrospective evaluation of pediatric cranio-spinal axis irradiation plans with the Hi-ART tomotherapy system

Helical tomotherapy (HT) can be used for the delivery of cranio-spinal axis irradiation (CSAI) without the need for beam matching of conventional linac-based external beam irradiation. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate HT plans used for treatment in nine patients treated with CSAI. Helical tomotherapy cranio-spinal axis irradiation (HT-CSAI) plans were created for each patient. Average length along the cranio-spinal axis of the PTV was 65.6 cm with a range between 53 and 74 cm. Treatment planning optimization and plan evaluation parameters were obtained from the HT planning station for each of the nine patients. PTV coverage by the 95% isodose surface ranged between 98.0 to 100.0% for all nine patients. The clinically acceptable dose variation within the PTV or tolerance range was between 0.7 and 2.5% for all nine patients. Doses to the organs at risk were clinically acceptable. An increasing length along the longitudinal axis of the PTV did not consistently increase the beam-on time indicating that using a larger jaw width had a greater impact on treatment time. With a larger jaw width it is possible to substantially reduce the normalized beam-on treatment time without compromising plan quality and sparing of organs at risk. By using a larger jaw width or lower modulation factor or both, normalized beam-on times were decreased by up to 61% as compared to the other evaluated treatment plans. From the nine cases reported in this study the minimum beam-on time was achieved with a jaw width of 5.0 cm, pitch of 0.287 and a modulation factor of 2.0. Large and long cylindrical volumes can be effectively treated with helical tomotherapy with both clinically acceptable dose distribution and beam-on time.

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Craniospinal Irradiation: Target Volume Considerations, Dose Constraints, and Competing Risks

PURPOSE

To report the results of an analysis of dose received to tissues and organs outside the target volume, in the setting of spinal axis irradiation for the treatment of medulloblastoma, using three treatment techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment plans (total dose, 23.4 Gy) for a standard two-dimensional (2D) technique, a three-dimensional (3D) technique using a 3D imaging-based target volume, and an intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique, were compared for 3 patients in terms of dose-volume statistics for target coverage, as well as organ at risk (OAR) and overall tissue sparing.

RESULTS

Planning target volume coverage and dose homogeneity was superior for the IMRT plans for V(95%) (IMRT, 100%; 3D, 96%; 2D, 98%) and V(107%) (IMRT, 3%; 3D, 38%; 2D, 37%). In terms of OAR sparing, the IMRT plan was better for all organs and whole-body contour when comparing V(10Gy), V(15Gy), and V(20Gy). The 3D plan was superior for V(5Gy) and below. For the heart and liver in particular, the IMRT plans provided considerable sparing in terms of V(10Gy) and above. In terms of the integral dose, the IMRT plans were superior for liver (IMRT, 21.9 J; 3D, 28.6 J; 2D, 38.6 J) and heart (IMRT, 9 J; 3D, 14.1J; 2D, 19.4 J), the 3D plan for the body contour (IMRT, 349 J; 3D, 337 J; 2D, 555 J).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is a valid treatment option for spinal axis irradiation. We have shown that IMRT results in sparing of organs at risk without a significant increase in integral dose.