Is there an optimal sequence of biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel disease?

Efficacy and safety of intravenous vedolizumab treatment in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody treatment for Crohn's disease (CD). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (NCT03234907) assessed vedolizumab efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe CD and inadequate/loss of response/intolerance to previous conventional or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients aged ≥18 to ≤80 years with moderate-to-severe CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] total score 220-400) were randomized 2:1 to vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous infusion or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 6 of induction, and every 4/8 weeks during Week 14-58 maintenance treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints at Week 10 were enhanced clinical response (≥100-point decrease from baseline CDAI score), and clinical remission (CDAI score ≤150), respectively. Additional Week 10 and/or Week 60 assessments included endoscopic and biomarker (C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin) measurements.

RESULTS

The study was conducted at 30 centers (August 2017 through August 2020). Enrolled patients (n = 215) were randomized to vedolizumab (n =144) or placebo (n = 71). By Week 10, 19.4% vedolizumab-treated versus 24.3% placebo-treated patients achieved an enhanced clinical response. The Cui-Hung-Wang-adjusted p-value for the primary endpoint was 0.347. After maintenance treatment at Week 60, rates of enhanced clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, mucosal healing, and biomarker improvements appeared greater for vedolizumab-treated than placebo-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no new safety findings for vedolizumab treatment of Chinese patients with CD. Although the primary endpoint was not met, vedolizumab-treated patients showed improvements in other disease activity measures at Weeks 10 and 60.

Vedolizumab for prevention of lower-GI acute GVHD in the Japanese subgroup analysis of the phase 3 GRAPHITE study

In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 GRAPHITE study (NCT03657160), anti-α4β7 integrin antibody vedolizumab showed greater efficacy than placebo for prevention of lower-gastrointestinal (GI) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after unrelated allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab versus placebo for lower-GI aGVHD prevention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients, when added to standard GVHD prophylaxis (calcineurin inhibitor + methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil + / - anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]). The analysis included 35 (18 vedolizumab-treated, 17 placebo-treated) Japanese and 298 (150 vedolizumab-treated, 148 placebo-treated) non-Japanese patients. Lower-GI aGVHD-free survival by day + 180 after allo-HSCT (primary endpoint) was 94% in vedolizumab-treated versus 81% in placebo-treated Japanese patients (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.03-4.01; P = 0.2) and 84% in vedolizumab-treated versus 70% in placebo-treated non-Japanese patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.78; P = 0.002). The number of events for the 5 key secondary endpoints (lower-GI aGVHD-free and relapse-free survival, Grade C-D aGVHD-free survival, non-relapse mortality, overall survival, and Grade B-D aGVHD-free survival) by day + 180 was lower in vedolizumab- versus placebo-treated Japanese patients. No safety concerns were identified for vedolizumab use as lower-GI aGVHD prophylaxis in Japanese patients.

Relapse Rates and Predictors for Relapse in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease Patients After Discontinuation of Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: The REVEUS Study

Background/Objectives: In the current era of tailored therapy, biologics such as vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are increasingly administered to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The decision to discontinue biologics after side effects or a lack of response is usually simple, but the decision to stop treatment in patients in remission is more difficult: to date, no study has been conducted to investigate the effects of VDZ or UST withdrawal. Our study aims to investigate the rates and predictors of relapse of IBD after the discontinuation of VDZ and UST during a well-controlled disease phase and to evaluate the response to retreatment. Methods: In this observational, multicenter, retrospective study, we included IBD patients who discontinued VDZ or UST during a well-controlled disease phase after at least 1 year of treatment. We collected demographic and clinical data for each patient at the time of discontinuation and at follow-up visits. Results: We included 36 IBD patients from 5 different centers; 80.0%, 58.5%, and 48.3% of patients maintained clinical remission at 12, 24, and 48 months after discontinuation, respectively. Crohn's disease (CD) patients were more likely to maintain remission than ulcerative colitis (UC) patients at 48 months (70.0% vs. 40.0%). No predictors of relapse were identified, but UC patients had a higher risk of early relapse than CD patients (HR = 3.23); 81.3% of retreated IBD patients achieved clinical remission after induction and at 12 months. Conclusions: No predictors of disease relapse after treatment discontinuation were identified. Half of the patients had a relapse within 48 months after discontinuation, but most of them achieved clinical remission after retreatment.

Etrasimod: Review of the efficacy and therapeutic prospects of a new oral therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Etrasimod is a synthetic, non-biological, orally administered small molecule sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator. Etrasimod was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2023 and by the European Medicine Agency in 2024, constituting a new therapeutic option for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in patients 16 years of age and older in the European Union. Its efficacy and tolerability have been demonstrated in several clinical trials both as induction and maintenance treatment, as well as in long-term extension studies. This article reviews the pharmacodynamic characteristics of etrasimod, its main differences with biological drugs and other small molecules (janus kinases inhibitors), as well as its clinical efficacy including certain subpopulations such as patients with isolated ulcerative proctitis, and the impact on their quality of life.

Impact of Prior Biologic Exposure on Ozanimod Efficacy and Safety in the Phase 3 True North Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC.

METHODS

TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed.

RESULTS

This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 vs ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 ( P = 0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 ( P = 0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed.

DISCUSSION

Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov , numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Exploring Dual-Targeted Therapy in the Management of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), often results in significant morbidity among patients with moderate to severe forms. While biologics and small molecules are effective in inducing remission, many patients experience refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of dual-targeted therapy in IBD patients treated at the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined 79 patients with UC or CD who received dual-targeted therapy at the University from October 2018 to August 2023. Data collected included demographics, disease characteristics, previous treatments, and clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes were endoscopic, radiographic, and patient-reported clinical improvements, with secondary outcomes focusing on safety profiles.

Results

Among the 79 patients (42 UC, 37 CD), 97 dual-targeted therapy cases were analyzed, primarily involving a biologic combined with a JAK inhibitor (90.7%). The median therapy duration was 39.1 weeks. Endoscopic improvement occurred in 69% of matched samples, with significant differences between pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores for UC (P = .002) and Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) scores for CD (P = .018). The median pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores across matched samples were 3 (range 1-3) and 1 (range 0-3), respectively, and for SES-CD scores were 12 (range 0-36) and 4 (range 0-20), respectively. Clinical improvement was reported by 73.2% of patients, with notable reductions in ESR (median 19 [range 2-124] mm/h to 9 [range 0-116] mm/h, P = .006), CRP (median 8.0 [range 0.2-78.5] mg/L to 3.0 [range 0.2-68.2] mg/L, P < .001), and albumin levels (4.0 [range 2.2-4.9] mg/dL to 4.2 [range 3.4-5.2], P < .001). Non-obesity was associated with both more endoscopic improvement (P = .002) and clinical improvement (P = .007). Adverse events occurred in 37 cases, predominantly upper respiratory tract infections and dermatologic issues, with no thromboembolic events reported.

Conclusions

Dual-targeted therapy demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with severe, refractory IBD and exhibited an acceptable safety profile. Despite the promising results, further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine optimal therapy combinations.

Relationship Between Patient Demographics and Biologic Therapy Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction

Biologic therapies treat patients with moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aims to investigate the demographics of biologic therapy use and its association with patient characteristics, a topic that has not yet been thoroughly assessed in our region.

Methods

Electronic health record data from June 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, were collected at a tertiary care IBD center in Kuwait. The primary outcome of this single-center cross-sectional study was to assess the demographics of use of various biologic therapies among patients with IBD. The secondary outcome was to assess whether the type of biologic therapy differed based on gender, age, and IBD type.

Results

Among the 513 patients using biologic therapy in this study, there were 210 (40.9%) on adalimumab (ADL), 154 (30.0%) on infliximab (IFX), 112 (21.9%) on ustekinumab (UST), and 33 (6.4%) on vedolizumab (VDZ). Patients taking VDZ were more likely to have ulcerative colitis (UC) (p < 0.001) and were more likely to be over 30 years old (p < 0.001). In contrast, patients on UST were less likely to be over 30 (p = 0.011) and more likely to have Crohn's disease (CD) (p < 0.001). In addition, patients on ADL were more likely to have Crohn's disease (p = 0.003), as were patients on IFX (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients taking VDZ were more likely to have UC and be over 30 years of age, while those on UST were more likely to be under 30 years of age and to have CD. Additionally, patients on ADL and IFX were more likely to have CD. This study highlighted the need for further research evaluating physicians' preferences and the effectiveness of different biological therapies in patients with IBD.

Effectiveness and Treatment Persistence of Vedolizumab Compared to Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor-α in Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Real-world evidence is essential for understanding the effectiveness and benefit-risk profile of vedolizumab outside clinical trial settings.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, systematically review and assess the real-world effectiveness and treatment persistence of vedolizumab in patients with CD, particularly over long-term follow-up periods and among populations with differing treatment experience, and to compare with the treatment persistence of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α treatment.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted to identify studies published from 2014 to 2022. Relevant congress searches were conducted (2015-2022) using Embase or by hand. Data on adults with CD treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNFα treatment in a real-world setting were extracted for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 73 studies, including 29,894 patients with CD, reported ≥ 1 outcome of interest for this analysis. Vedolizumab treatment persistence rate was 65.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.2-70.1) at 1 year and 54.8% (95% CI 43.9-65.3) at 2 years. The treatment persistence rate with vedolizumab versus anti-TNFα treatment was 84.6% (95% CI 70.2-92.8) versus 75.3% (95% CI 69.7-80.2) at 1 year and 70.6% (95% CI 60.7-78.8) versus 64.6% (95% CI 56.7-71.8) at 2 years. The mucosal healing rate at 1 year was 40.6% (95% CI 34.2-47.3). Clinical remission rates were 39.4% (95% CI 33.9-45.1) at 1 year and 34.3% (95% CI 18.1-55.2) at 2 years. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 33.2% (95% CI 28.5-38.3) at 1 year and 20.4% (95% CI 12.5-31.5) at 2 years. All clinical outcome rates were higher in biologic-naive than in biologic-experienced patients.

CONCLUSION

Real-world use of vedolizumab was associated with favourable long-term effectiveness and treatment persistence. Vedolizumab is a suitable first-line biological option for biologic-naive patients with CD.

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced Therapies for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: 2024 American Gastroenterological Association Evidence Synthesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Guidelines on the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases through November 21, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials in adults with moderate-to-severe UC, comparing different advanced therapies (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, interleukin 12/23 or selective interleukin 23 antagonists, and Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors) against placebo or another active comparator. Our primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of clinical remission, and our secondary outcome was endoscopic improvement. We performed a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to appraise certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

After excluding JAK inhibitors as potential first-line treatment (in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration), low-certainty evidence supports clinically important benefit with infliximab, ozanimod, risankizumab, and guselkumab over adalimumab and mirikizumab for achieving remission with induction therapy in biologically naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC, with risankizumab and ozanimod being ranked the highest for induction of clinical remission. With the inclusion of JAK inhibitors as first-line therapy, upadacitinib was more efficacious compared with all other medications except ozanimod and risankizumab, with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In patients with prior biologic exposure, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab were ranked highest for achieving remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to appraise quality of evidence, this updated network meta-analysis will be used to inform comparative efficacy and positioning of advanced therapies for the treatment of biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

New Ustekinumab Biosimilar Candidate FYB202: Pharmacokinetic Equivalence Demonstrated in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Single-Dose Trial in Healthy Subjects

In the RUSTIC trial, pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between the proposed ustekinumab biosimilar FYB202 and EU-approved (EU-Ref) and US-licensed ustekinumab (US-Ref) as well as between both reference drugs was assessed after a single 45-mg subcutaneous injection. Safety analyses comprised immunogenicity (antidrug antibodies, neutralizing antibodies), adverse events, and local tolerability. Overall, 491 healthy adults were randomized 1:1:1 and observed for up to 112 days; 486 completed the trial, and 478 were included in the PK analysis. All 3 comparisons showed PK similarity, since the 90% confidence intervals of the respective geometric mean ratios for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum serum concentration were contained within the acceptance interval of 80%-125%. No clinically meaningful differences regarding overall safety, immunogenicity, and local tolerability were observed. Notably, after FYB202 administration, in fewer subjects at least 1 positive antidrug antibody result was observed compared to the reference groups (FYB202, 20%; EU-Ref, 42%; US-Ref, 51%). In conclusion, the RUSTIC trial demonstrated equivalent PK characteristics for FYB202 when compared to both EU-Ref and US-Ref ustekinumab and between both reference drugs. It provides the basis for the marketing authorization of FYB202, together with an extensive analytical characterization and the results of a confirmatory efficacy and safety trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Prediction of the Short-Term Effectiveness of Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease

Background

Ustekinumab (UST) is recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). However, the efficacy of certain patients may be suboptimal and necessitate intensive treatment or modification of the treatment regimen. We sought to establish a nomogram model to predict the short-term effectiveness of UST in moderate to severe CD patients.

Methods

We established a derivation cohort comprising patients diagnosed with CD and treated with UST at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from May 2020 to July 2023. The patient data, including demographic and clinical characteristics as well as treatment details, were systematically collected. The achievement of clinical remission (defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index, CDAI < 150, without corticosteroid usage) after induction therapy was the endpoint observed during follow-up. Potential predictors were identified through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to construct a nomogram model. The predictive accuracy and discriminative power of the model were assessed by Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves and calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to assess the clinical application value of the model.

Results

162 patients were included in the derivation cohort. The predictor's selection was according to the minimum criteria. Prognostic factors, including duration, body mass index (BMI), smoking, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), perianal lesions (P), history of Vedolizumab therapy, and albumin levels (ALB), were identified and included in the nomogram. The model showed good discrimination and calibration on internal validation based on the bootstrap method (C-index: 0.843, 95% confidence interval: 0.768-0.903). Moreover, DCA demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically beneficial.

Conclusion

We constructed a practical tool to assist clinicians in identifying moderate to severe CD patients who are expected to have a good clinical response to UST, promoting personalized treatment and the development of precision medicine.

Real-world clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategies in patients with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease in Argentina: Data from the RISE-AR study

OBJECTIVE

Real-world evidence on the adoption of different pharmacological strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America is scarce. Herein, we describe real-world sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and different therapeutic approaches used in patients with IBD in Argentina.

METHODS

RISE AR (NCT03488030) was a multicenter, non-interventional study with a cross-sectional evaluation and a 3-year retrospective chart review conducted in Argentina. Adult patients with a previous diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) at least 6 months prior to enrollment were included.

RESULTS

This study included 246 patients with IBD (CD: 41%; UC: 59%), with a median age of 39.5 years (IQR 30.7-51.7) for CD and 41.9 years (33.3-55.3) for UC. Overall, 51.5% of CD patients had colonic disease involvement, while 45.5% of UC patients had extensive colitis. At enrollment, the overall use of biologics was high, especially in CD patients (CD: 73.2% vs. UC: 30.3%, p<0.001), while the use of immunosuppressants was similar (∼41%, p=1.000) for both diseases. IBD treatments ever prescribed and healthcare resources utilization during the retrospective period were (CD, UC): biologics: 79.2%, 33.8% (p<0.001); immunosuppressants: 65.3%, 58.6% (p=0.352); aminosalicylates: 62.4%, 97.9% (p<0.001); corticosteroids: 55.4%, 69.7% (p=0.031); surgery: 17.8%, 1.4% (p<0.001); and hospitalizations: 33.7%, 21.4% (p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of IBD patients, overall prescription patterns of conventional therapy were similar to reports elsewhere; however, biologic therapy use was high, especially in CD, consistent with disease behavior and possibly reflecting better access to care in referral centers. Interestingly, over half of CD patients presented colonic involvement.

Real-World Persistence of Successive Biologics in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Findings From ROTARY

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may receive multiple successive biologic treatments in clinical practice; however, data are limited on the comparative effectiveness of biologics and the impact of treatment sequence on outcomes.

METHODS

The ROTARY (Real wOrld ouTcomes Across tReatment sequences in inflammatorY bowel disease patients) study was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted using data from the Optum Clinical Database between January 1, 2012, and February 29, 2020. Adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received 2 biologics successively were included. Biologic treatment sequences were analyzed descriptively. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, were used to estimate the hazard ratio of switching or discontinuation for each first- and second-line biologic compared with first- and second-line adalimumab, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 4648 patients with IBD (CD, n = 3008; UC, n = 1640) were identified. Most patients received tumor necrosis factor α antagonist (anti-TNFα) treatment followed by another anti-TNFα treatment or vedolizumab. Vedolizumab and infliximab had 39.4% and 34.6% lower rates of switching or discontinuation than adalimumab, respectively, as first-line biologics in patients with CD and 30.8% and 34.3% lower rates as first-line biologics in patients with UC, respectively. Vedolizumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab had 47.2%, 40.0%, and 43.5% lower rates of switching or discontinuation than adalimumab, respectively, as second-line biologics in CD and 56.5%, 43.0%, and 45.6% lower rates as second-line biologics in patients with UC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although anti-TNFα treatments were most commonly prescribed, the adjusted rates of discontinuation for adalimumab as both a first- and second-line biologic were higher than for vedolizumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab.

Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences.

METHODS

ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab.

RESULTS

In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.

Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have compared the efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) and anti-TNF agents [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab(ADA)] in moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of UST, IFX, and ADA while differentiating between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients, which is an underexplored aspect, particularly in Asia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multi-center study from 2012 to 2023, categorizing patients into bio-naïve and bio-experienced groups. We evaluated clinical remission rates after induction therapy and clinical outcomes, including CD-related hospitalization, intestinal resection, and drug discontinuation during maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 214 bio-naïve CD patients, 60 received UST, 108 received IFX, and 46 received ADA. After 1:1 propensity score matching between UST and anti-TNF agents groups, 59 patients were analyzed in each group (45 in the IFX group and 14 in the ADA group). We found no significant differences in clinical remission rates (P = 0.071), CD-related hospitalization (P = 0.800), intestinal resection (P = 0.390), or drug discontinuation (P = 0.052) between the UST, IFX, and ADA groups in bio-naïve CD patients. In bio-experienced CD patients, with 35 in the UST group and 13 in the anti-TNF agents group, the UST group showed a lower risk of drug discontinuation (P = 0.004) than the anti-TNF agents group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that UST, IFX, and ADA are equally effective in bio-naïve CD patients, while in bio-experienced patients, mostly with previous exposure to anti-TNF agents, UST may offer superior drug durability.

Cost-Effectiveness of Vedolizumab as a First-Line Advanced Therapy Versus Adalimumab Treatment Sequences for Ulcerative Colitis in Italy

BACKGROUND

Today, there are many treatment options available for the management of ulcerative colitis, creating challenges in selecting the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment sequences. Treatments in the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapeutic class, as well as vedolizumab, are widely used and endorsed as first-line options according to treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to compare treatment sequences involving vedolizumab and the anti-TNFα treatment adalimumab in terms of cost-effectiveness in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in Italy.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model comparing treatment sequences within the Italian National Health Service in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with a lifetime horizon was developed. The analysis focused on the relative positioning of vedolizumab and adalimumab, leveraging the results of the landmark head-to-head VARSITY clinical trial as key inputs. The robustness of the results was investigated through a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses.

RESULTS

The strategy of vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy followed by adalimumab was associated with higher costs and health benefits compared with first-line adalimumab followed by vedolizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €16,146/QALY, which was found to be robust to changes to inputs associated with areas of high uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

This economic evaluation estimated a 94% probability that vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy is cost-effective at a threshold of €33,004/QALY when compared with first-line adalimumab sequences. Using clinical trial evidence to inform the efficacy of second-line treatments estimated that the effectiveness of anti-TNFα treatments is not substantially reduced by vedolizumab exposure.

Co-occurrence of oral pemphigus vulgaris and herpes simplex virus infection in a young patient with Crohn's disease: report of a rare case of oral lesions during anti-TFN alpha and immunomodulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous autoimmune disease that affects desmoglein-1 and desmoglein-3, leading to intraepithelial vesiculobullous lesions. In the oral mucosa, PV lesions can mimic other diseases such as mucous membrane pemphigoid, other forms of pemphigus, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and virus-induced ulcers like herpes simplex virus (HSV), making diagnosis challenging. The co-occurrence of PV with Crohn's disease is rare and predominantly seen in younger patients. The therapeutic mainstay for both PV and Crohn's disease usually involves systemic corticosteroids combined with immunosuppressants and immunobiological drugs. Literature indicates that the use of these drugs, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors, for managing autoimmune diseases like Crohn's can potentially induce other autoimmune diseases known as autoimmune-like syndromes, which include episodes of lupus-like syndrome and inflammatory neuropathies. There are few cases in the literature reporting the development of PV in individuals with CD undergoing infliximab therapy.

CASE REPORT

A young female with severe Crohn's disease, treated with the TNF-alpha inhibitor infliximab, developed friable pseudomembranous oral ulcerations. Histopathological and immunofluorescence analyses confirmed these as PV. The treatment included clobetasol propionate and low-level photobiomodulation, which resulted in partial improvement. The patient later experienced severe intestinal bleeding, requiring intravenous hydrocortisone therapy, which improved both her systemic condition and oral lesions. Weeks later, new ulcerations caused by herpes virus and candidiasis were identified, leading to treatment with oral acyclovir, a 21-day regimen of oral nystatin rinse, and photodynamic therapy, ultimately healing the oral infections. To manage her condition, the gastroenterologists included methotrexate (25 mg) in her regimen to reduce the immunogenicity of infliximab and minimize corticosteroid use, as the patient was in remission for Crohn's disease, and the oral PV lesions were under control.

CONCLUSION

Young patients with Crohn's disease should be referred to an oral medicine specialist for comorbidity investigation, as oral PV and opportunistic infections can arise during immunosuppressive therapy. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors in patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn's, should be carefully evaluated for potential side effects, including oral PV.

A molecular subtyping associated with the cGAS-STING pathway provides novel perspectives on the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by an abnormal immune response, and the pathogenesis lacks clear understanding. The cGAS-STING pathway is an innate immune signaling pathway that plays a significant role in various pathophysiological processes. However, the role of the cGAS-STING pathway in UC remains largely unclear. In this study, we obtained transcriptome sequencing data from multiple publicly available databases. cGAS-STING related genes were obtained through literature search, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed using R package limma. Hub genes were identified through protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis and module construction. The ConsensuClusterPlus package was utilized to identify molecular subtypes based on hub genes. The therapeutic response, immune microenvironment, and biological pathways of subtypes were further investigated. A total of 18 DEGs were found in UC patients. We further identified IFI16, MB21D1 (CGAS), TMEM173 (STING) and TBK1 as the hub genes. These genes are highly expressed in UC. IFI16 exhibited the highest diagnostic value and predictive value for response to anti-TNF therapy. The expression level of IFI16 was higher in non-responders to anti-TNF therapy. Furthermore, a cluster analysis based on genes related to the cGAS-STING pathway revealed that patients with higher gene expression exhibited elevated immune burden and inflammation levels. This study is a pioneering analysis of cGAS-STING pathway-related genes in UC. These findings provide new insights for the diagnosis of UC and the prediction of therapeutic response.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Gender Effects in Valencia's Low-Prevalence Region

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent studies point out to epidemiological changes in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Our aims were to determine in PSC patients followed in several centers in a Mediterranean geographic area: (i) changes in baseline features and (ii) effect of gender on clinical course.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study of PSC patients treated in 8 hospitals in a Mediterranean area between 2000 and 2021. Charts were reviewed compiling demographic, clinical, radiological, and histological variables.

RESULTS

Cohort of 112 PSC patients included, 42% women, 70% diagnosed after 2010. Women were increasingly diagnosed in recent cohorts. The median time from diagnosis to the combined endpoint liver transplantation (Lt) and/or death was 6.9 years. Asthenia at diagnosis (p = 0.009) was associated with lower transplant-free survival, while diagnosis before 2005 was associated with greater LT-free survival (p < 0.001). By Cox regression, LT-free survival was not influenced by age, sex, or cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis. Women were found to have less jaundice at diagnosis (2 vs 14%; p = 0.013), higher prevalence of ANA antibodies (43.9 vs 15.7%; p = 0.003), and lower GGT levels at diagnosis (GGT 123 vs 209U/L; p = 0.014) than men.

CONCLUSION

In an area traditionally considered to have low prevalence, the prevalence of affected women surpasses expectations based on existing literature. There appear to be gender-related variations in the presentation of the condition, highlighting the need for confirmation through larger-scale studies.

Timing of first abdominal operation in Crohn's disease based on a diagnostic model

This study aims to develop a clinical diagnostic model for assessing the need for initial abdominal surgery in patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) and create a nomogram to facilitate clinical decision-making. A total of 164 surgical CD patients and 230 control CD patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression and binomial logistic regression were employed to select clinical variables. The 394 CD patients were randomly allocated to a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. The filtered variables were used to establish a diagnostic model and nomogram in the training set, subsequently validated in the testing set. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve were constructed to validate the clinical applicability of the model. Binomial logistic regression analysis identified seven clinical variables with a p-value less than 0.01, including Biomarker (B), Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR), Intestinal obstruction, Albumin (ALB), Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Myocardial Flow Index (MFI), and C-reactive protein (CRP). These variables were utilized to establish the diagnostic model. Calibration curves showed good alignment, with a C-index of 0.996 in the training set and 0.990 in the testing set. DCA and clinical impact curve demonstrated that the diagnostic model had good clinical efficiency and could provide clinical benefits. A validated diagnostic model for determining the timing of the first abdominal operation in CD patients was established and evaluated, showing high discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical efficiency. It can be utilized by clinicians to assess the optimal timing for transitioning CD patients from medical treatment to surgical intervention, providing valuable references for individualized treatment decisions for CD patients.

Immunogenicity and Loss of Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Due to Anti-Drug Antibody Development

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience a loss of effectiveness to biologic therapy (i.e., anti-TNF therapy, etc.). Therefore, in addition to the adverse effects of the treatment, these patients also face failure to achieve and maintain remission. Immunogenicity, the process of production of antibodies to biological agents, is fundamental to the evolution of loss of response to treatment in IBD patients. The presence of these antibodies in patients is linked to decreased serum drug levels and inhibited biological activity. However, immunogenicity rates exhibit significant variability across inflammatory disease states, immunoassay formats, and time periods. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the immunogenicity and immune mechanisms of antibody formation to biologics, the loss of therapy response, clinical results of biological treatment for IBD from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as well as to summarize the most recent strategies for overcoming immunogenicity and approaches for managing treatment failure in IBD.

Research progress of Ustekinumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, recurrent gastrointestinal disorder with elusive etiology. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-23 have emerged as key proinflammatory mediators/cytokines in IBD pathogenesis. Ustekinumab (UST), targeting IL-12 and IL-23, has demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of IBD. Recently, UST has become increasingly favored as a potential first-line treatment option. This review delineates UST's mechanism of action, its clinical applications in IBD, including the response rates, strategies for dose optimization for case of partial or lost response, and potential adverse events. This review aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of UST's role as a therapeutic option in IBD management.

The economic impact of suboptimal treatment and treatment switch among patients with Crohn's disease treated with a first-line biologic - A US retrospective claims database study

AIMS

Suboptimal treatment indicators, including treatment switch, are common among patients with Crohn's disease (CD), but little is known about their associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. This study assessed the impact of suboptimal treatment indicators on HRU and costs among adults with CD newly treated with a first-line biologic.

METHODS

Adult patients with CD were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Subset (10/01/2015-03/31/2020). The index date was defined as initiation of the first-line biologic, and the study period was defined as the 12 months following the index date. Patients were classified into Suboptimal Treatment and Optimal Treatment cohorts based on observed indicators of suboptimal treatment during the study period. Patients in the Suboptimal Treatment Cohort with a treatment switch were classified into the Treatment Switch Cohort and compared to patients with no treatment switch. All-cause HRU and costs were measured during the study period and assessed for patients with suboptimal vs optimal treatment and patients with vs without a treatment switch.

RESULTS

The study included 4,006 patients (Suboptimal Treatment: 2,091, Optimal Treatment: 1,915). Treatment switch was a common indicator of suboptimal treatment (Treatment Switch: 640, No Treatment Switch: 3,366). HRU and costs were significantly higher among patients with suboptimal treatment than those with optimal treatment (annual costs: $92,043 vs $73,764; p < 0.01), and among those with a treatment switch than those with no treatment switch (annual costs: $95,689 vs $81,027; p < 0.01). Increases in the number of suboptimal treatment indicators were associated with increased costs.

LIMITATIONS

Claims data were used to identify suboptimal treatment indicators based on observed treatment patterns; reasons for treatment decisions could not be assessed.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with suboptimal treatment indicators, including treatment switch, incur substantially higher HRU and costs compared to patients receiving optimal treatment and those that do not switch treatments.

Novel Small Molecules in IBD: Current State and Future Perspectives

Biologicals have dominated the therapeutic scenery in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), namely ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), for the past 20 years. The development of tofacitinib was the starting point for an era of small molecules after the era of biologicals. These new agents may challenge the use of biological agents in the future. They share properties that appeal to both patients and physicians. Low production costs, a lack of immunogenicity, and ease of use are only some of their benefits. On the other hand, patients and their physicians must manage the potential side effects of small molecules such as JAK inhibitors or S1P1R modulators. Here, we present agents that have already entered the clinical routine and those that are still being investigated in clinical trials.