The influence of exercise therapy dosing on pain and functional outcomes in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: A systematic review

Painful considerations in exercise-management for rotator cuff related shoulder pain: a scoping review on pain-related prescription parameters

BACKGROUND

Resistance exercise is recommended as the first line of treatment for rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP), but with conflicting evidence supporting the superiority of specific prescription parameters. Particularly, the role of pain-related prescription parameters remains poorly understood, despite their wide clinical application and potential impact on treatment outcomes. This review aims to investigate how pain-related prescription parameters, such as pain allowance and intensity limits, are reported, described, and applied in clinical trials assessing resistance exercise interventions for RCRSP.

METHODS

Guided by PRISMA-ScR, this scoping review followed a comprehensive and systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE (EMBASE), Central (Cochrane), PEDro and CINAHL (EBSCO). Two authors independently performed title and abstract screening, and full text screening on eligible records. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in English between 2018 and 2023, applying resistance exercise for RCRSP were included. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches to data analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 7500 records, of which 4588 titles and abstracts were screened after duplicate removal. Altogether, 304 full texts were screened leaving a total of 86 records in the final analysis. Fifty-eight (67%) studies did not mention the use of any pain-related prescription parameters, resulting in data extraction from the 28 remaining studies. Applied parameters were widely heterogenic, but three categories of pain allowance styles were identified and categorized into "yes", "no" or "ambiguous". These categories were commonly guided by specific Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)/Visual Analog Scale (VAS) limits or individual pain tolerance, used for pain monitoring and exercise progression. Citations and/or justifications for the chosen pain-related prescription parameters were reported by 10 (36%) studies, in which 5 main themes for justifications, and 3 key papers for the citations were identified.

CONCLUSION

This review reveals substantial reporting deficiencies regarding pain-related prescription parameters in RCTs addressing RCRSP with resistance exercise. The identified parameters varied widely, reflecting a lack of consensus and evidence-based guidance in the literature and in a clinical setting. To advance our understanding on the role of pain-related prescription parameters, more consistent reporting of these parameters in future research is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Published on the Open Science Framework 28.02.24: osf.io/a52kn.

Individualized Versus General Exercise Therapy in People With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of individualized exercises based on movement fault (MF) control on pain intensity, and disability in subjects with chronic subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-eight participants with chronic SAPS (mean [SD] age, 52.23 (8.47); 60 % women).

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were randomly allocated to 1 of the intervention groups (individualized exercises based on MFs control test designed to target specific movement faults) or the control group (commonly prescribed general scapular stabilization exercises). Both groups received exercise sessions twice a week for 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were pain intensity at rest (PR) and during arm raising (PAR) using a visual analog scale. Disability was assessed as a key secondary outcome, including the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

RESULTS

Following completion of all exercise sessions, PAR was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (mean, 9.17; 95% confidence interval; 0.31-18.03; P=.04), with a large effect size (0.68). The reduction of PAR remained significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group after 4 months of follow-up (mean, 18.29; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 9.09-27.48; P<.00) with a large effect size (1.27). Disability significantly decreased at 2-month (mean, 14.58, P=.002 on SPADI index; mean, 10.26, P=.006 on DASH index) and 4-month (mean, 19.85, P<.001 on SPADI index; mean, 12.09, P=.001 on DASH index) follow-ups in the intervention group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Individualized exercises based on MFs control of the shoulder region was accompanied by decreased PAR and disability in subjects with SAPS.

In people with shoulder pain, mobilisation with movement and exercise improves function and pain more than sham mobilisation with movement and exercise: a randomised trial

QUESTION

In people with shoulder pain, what is the effect of adding mobilisation with movement (MWM) to a standard exercise program on function and pain compared with sham MWM and the same exercise program?

DESIGN

A randomised trial with concealed allocation, blinded outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy people with chronic atraumatic rotator cuff related pain, with a mean age 48 years (SD 10).

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental group received MWM plus exercise and the control group received sham MWM plus exercise. Treatments were delivered twice per week for 5 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were function (0 to 100 Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and pain (0 to 10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes were self-efficacy, perceived improvement and active pain-free range of movement. Assessment time points were at baseline (week 0), the end of the treatment period (week 5) and a follow-up 1 month after the end of treatment (week 9).

RESULTS

At week 5, the experimental group improved more than the control group in function (MD -15 points, 95% CI -24 to -7), pain at night (MD -2.1, 95% CI -3.1 to -1.1), pain on movement (MD -1.5, 95% CI -2.5 to -0.6) and active range of movement in flexion (MD 16 deg, 95% CI 1 to 30), abduction (MD 23 deg, 95% CI 6 to 40), external rotation (MD 11 deg, 95% CI 4 to 17) and hand behind back (MD 20 deg, 95% CI 8 to 32). At week 9, benefits were seen in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (MD -9 points, 95% CI -17 to -1), pain at night (MD -1.9, 95% CI -2.9 to -0.8) and on movement (MD -1.3, 95% CI-2.3 to -0.3). The effects of the experimental intervention on other outcomes were mostly unclear due to wide confidence intervals. Blinding was successful.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding MWM to exercise improved function, pain and active range of movement in people with shoulder pain. These benefits were not placebo effects.

REGISTRATION

NCT04175184.

Effects of a web application based on multimedia animations to support therapeutic exercise for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: protocol for an open-label randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is the most common cause of shoulder pain. Currently, exercise is proposed as the first-line treatment for patients suffering from RCRSP. However, adherence to therapeutic exercise programmes can be poor in the long term in a home setting. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of adding video animations to a traditional paper-based exercise programme.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A single-centre, randomised, open-labelled clinical trial will be conducted in a hospital in Spain. Adults aged between 18 and 80 years diagnosed with RCRSP who meet the eligibility criteria will be included. Patients (n=132) will be randomised into two groups, with both receiving paper-based exercises, and the experimental group will also be provided with video animations. The participants will receive seven face-to-face physical therapy sessions and will be asked to perform the exercises at home for 6 months. The primary outcome measure will be the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, measured at baseline, 3 weeks, 3 months (primary analysis) and 6 months. Secondary outcomes will be the patient's pain intensity during the last week (rest, during movement and at night); expectations of improvement; satisfaction with treatment; impression of improvement; perceived usability, usefulness and satisfaction of multimedia animations; and adherence to exercises. Generalised least squares regression models with an autoregressive-moving average lag one correlation structure will be implemented, with an intention-to-treat analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the ethics committee of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (Madrid, Spain), reference number CI18/16. All participants will sign an informed consent. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05770908.

Is exercise therapy the right treatment for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain? Uncertainties, theory, and practice

BACKGROUND

Exercise therapy is a popular non-surgical treatment to help manage individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) and is recommended in all clinical practice guidelines. Due to modest effect sizes, low quality evidence, uncertainty relating to efficacy, and mechanism(s) of benefit, exercise as a therapeutic intervention has been the subject of increasing scrutiny.

AIMS

The aim of this critical review is to lay out where the purported uncertainties of exercise for RCRSP exist by exploring the relevant quantitative and qualitative literature. We conclude by offering theoretical and practical considerations to help reduce the uncertainty of delivering exercise therapy in a clinical environment.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Uncertainty underpins much of the theory and practice of delivering exercise therapy for individuals with RCRSP. Nonetheless, exercise is an often-valued treatment by individuals with RCRSP, when provided within an appropriate clinical context. We encourage clinicians to use a shared decision-making paradigm and embrace a pluralistic model when prescribing therapeutic exercise. This may take the form of using exercise experiments to trial different exercise approaches, adjusting, and adapting the exercise type, load, and context based on the individual's symptom irritability, preferences, and goals.

CONCLUSION

We contend that providing exercise therapy should remain a principal treatment option for helping individuals with RCRSP. Limitations notwithstanding, exercise therapy is relatively low cost, accessible, and often valued by individuals with RCRSP. The uncertainty surrounding exercise therapy requires ongoing research and emphasis could be directed towards investigating causal mechanisms to better understand how exercise may benefit an individual with RCRSP.

Reproducibility of Exercise Interventions in Randomized Controlled Trials for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reproducibility of exercise therapy interventions in randomized controlled trials for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP).

DATA SOURCES

Data sources included Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from studies published from database inception to April 23, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials studying the use of exercise therapy for RCRSP.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers extracted exercise reporting details from all studies using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the modified Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). The same 2 reviewers assessed risk of bias of all studies using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2.0.

DATA SYNTHESIS

For 104 studies meeting inclusion criteria, the average number of items reported on the TIDieR was 5.27 (SD 2.50, range 1-12 out of 12) and 5.09 (SD 4.01, range 0-16 out of 16) on the CERT. Improved reporting over time was seen on both the TIDieR and CERT dating back to 1993 and through April 23, 2022. When comparing groups of studies published before and after the TIDieR (2014) and CERT (2016) were established, a statistically significant increase in median scores was noted on the TIDieR (P=.02) but not the CERT (P=.31). Quality of exercise therapy reporting was highest in studies with "low risk" of bias, and lowest in studies with "high risk" of bias on the RoB-2.

CONCLUSION

Overall exercise reporting in trials for RCRSP is incomplete despite the development of the TIDieR and CERT checklists. This has implications for translating evidence into practice.

Treatment fidelity in clinical trials

In the context of clinical trials, treatment fidelity (TF) has traditionally referred to the extent to which an intervention or treatment is implemented by the clinicians as intended by the researchers who designed the trial. Updated definitions of TF have included an appropriate design of the intervention that was performed in a way that is known to be therapeutically beneficial. This requires careful attention to three key components: (1) protocol and dosage adherence, (2) quality of delivery, and (3) participant adherence. In this viewpoint, we describe several cases in which TF was lacking in clinical trials and give opportunities to improve the deficits encountered in those trials. We feel that along with quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence, TF should be considered an essential element of the veracity of clinical trial.

Manual Therapy and Exercise Have Similar Outcomes to Corticosteroid Injections in the Management of Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) is the most frequent diagnosis in patients with shoulder pain presenting with persistent pain and significant functional decline. Although exercise and manual therapy (EMT) and corticosteroid injections provide first-line treatment options, evidence for the best management of SAPS remains inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EMT compared with corticosteroid injections on disability, recovery rates, and pain in patients with SAPS through a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of EMT alone or as an additive intervention compared to corticosteroid injections were included. Methodological quality was evaluated with the PEDro score and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In total, 8 trials with 946 patients were included. EMT presented no difference in disability compared with corticosteroid injections at very short- (standardized mean difference {SMD}: 0.19; 95%CI: -0.20, 0.58), short- (SMD: -0.16; 95%CI: -0.58, 0.25), mid- (SMD: -0.14; 95%CI: -0.44, 0.16), and long-term (SMD: 0.00; 95%CI: -0.25, 0.25) follow-up. No difference was found between the comparators in self-perceived recovery at very short- (risk ratio: 0.93; 95%CI: 0.71, 1.21) and mid- (risk ratio: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.90, 1.07) follow-up and in pain rating at very short- (SMD: -0.18; 95%CI: -0.73, 0.38), short- (SMD: 0.05; 95%CI: -0.26, 0.37), and long-term (SMD: 0.04; 95%CI: -0.26, 0.34) follow-ups. The addition of corticosteroid injections to EMT provided no better results in shoulder disability compared with EMT (SMD: 0.45; 95%CI: -0.47, 1.37) or corticosteroid injections alone (MD: 2.70; 95%CI: -7.70, 13.10) in the mid-term. Based on very low to moderate certainty of evidence, EMT has similar effects to corticosteroid injections on improving all outcomes in patients with SAPS at all follow-up periods. Based on low certainty of evidence the combination of both interventions does not change the treatment outcome compared with each intervention alone.