Comparison of Intra-articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid and N-Acetyl Cysteine in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study

Potential of N-acetylcysteine in the management of low back pain: a scoping review of studies in humans and animal models

Low back pain (LBP) is a common type of pain that causes disability and impairs cognitive function. With over 80% of adults estimated to experience LBP during their lifetime, this type of pain not only has a significant impact on the individual, but also on public health systems and national economies. Unfortunately, there is no single standard of care for patients with LBP. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), which is used clinically to treat acetaminophen overdose, has recently been tested as a potential treatment for LBP. NAC is inexpensive and commercially available, and it has an established tolerance and safety profile. However, NAC's efficacy in LBP has not been established. This scoping review presents a summary of studies investigating the effects of NAC and the potential benefits in LBP treatment, and highlights its potential molecular mechanisms and side effects. A systematic literature search in Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cinahl, and Lilacs databases was conducted. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used to ensure integrity of the review. The scoping review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework. No limit was set on study language and publication date. In total, 2357 articles were located, of which 16 were included. The studies show that NAC has potential for LBP treatment, but data are derived only from a few clinical trials and preclinical studies. Thus, there is much to learn and more clinical studies should be performed before NAC can be clinically recommended for the treatment of LBP.

Mechanisms of Action of Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Targeted Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The knee is the most commonly afflicted joint in osteoarthritis (OA). Injection of intra-articular of hyaluronic acid (IAHA) is a frequently used therapy for the management of knee OA with varying product characteristics.

PURPOSE

To describe and characterize the mechanism of action (MoA) of IAHA products concerning nociception, chondroprotection, and anti-inflammatory properties via a targeted literature review.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

We followed the standard methodologies for conducting and reporting targeted reviews as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, adapted for conducting a targeted literature review. Relevant studies were identified by searching the Embase database using predefined search strategies via the Ovid platform. The results of the review were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses).

RESULTS

A total of 182 studies were included in this targeted literature review. Of these, 107 reported chondroprotective action, 59 anti-inflammatory activity, 18 analgesic properties, 30 proteoglycan or glycosaminoglycan synthesis, 8 subchondral bone effects, 2 mechanical effects, and 1 other effects of IAHA. These MoAs were studied through diverse types of studies: in vitro biochemistry, animal physiological studies, or human physiological and clinical studies. The chondroprotective effect was the most studied MoA and showed an increase in anabolic biomarkers, such as collagen types II, IX, and XI, and a reduction in catabolic biomarkers, such as matrix metalloproteinases, which play a primary role in the downstream signaling pathways in OA and cartilage degradation in the synovial fluid. IAHA was widely reported by studies to reduce soluble inflammatory mediators, such as interleukins 1β and 6 and tumor necrosis factor α, thereby decreasing the production of degradative enzymes (eg, matrix metalloproteinases, aggrecanases). IAHA was also reported to enhance the synthesis of intrinsic proteoglycan (eg, aggrecan) and glycosaminoglycans, thus delaying the progression of OA. IAHA also reported improvement in the mechanical function of the knee by increasing the viscosity of the synovial fluid, reducing the coefficient of friction, and improving its lubrication. Overall, a significant decrease in knee pain was observed after IAHA treatments.

CONCLUSION

Preclinical and clinical studies established evidence for varied MoAs by which IAHA preparations may produce a desired effect in patients with knee OA.

Comparison of Different Molecular Weights of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Level I Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The present Bayesian network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of intra-articular injections of different molecular weights of hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: In November 2024, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. All randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of intra-articular HA injections for knee osteoarthritis were accessed. The outcome of interest was to evaluate pain according to the visual analogue scale (VAS). The groups included for comparison were the ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW), high molecular weight (HMW), medium molecular weight (MMW), and low molecular weight (LMW). Results: Data from 9822 patients were collected. The mean age of the patients was 62.1 ± 5.0 years with given comparability at baseline. Different follow-up periods were compared. The longest control period ranged from four to six months, and the UHMW and HMW injections were the interventions associated with the greatest reduction in the VAS. LMW HA was the intervention associated with the lowest decrease in VAS, falling short of the control group. Conclusions: The main findings of the present Bayesian network meta-analysis, with a current level I of evidence, suggests that the UHMW and HMW HA has a beneficial effect on pain at 6 months post intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR): a potential new therapeutic target for rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by systemic synovitis and bone destruction. Proinflammatory cytokines activate pathways of immune-mediated inflammation, which aggravates RA. The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway associated with RA connects immune and metabolic signals, which regulates immune cell proliferation and differentiation, macrophage polarization and migration, antigen presentation, and synovial cell activation. Therefore, therapy strategies targeting mTOR have become an important direction of current RA treatment research. In the current review, we summarize the biological functions of mTOR, its regulatory effects on inflammation, and the curative effects of mTOR inhibitors in RA, thus providing references for the development of RA therapeutic targets and new drugs.

A guide to preclinical evaluation of hydrogel-based devices for treatment of cartilage lesions

The drive to develop cartilage implants for the treatment of major defects in the musculoskeletal system has resulted in a major research thrust towards developing biomaterial devices for cartilage repair. Investigational devices for the restoration of articular cartilage are considered as significant risk materials by regulatory bodies and therefore proof of efficacy and safety prior to clinical testing represents a critical phase of the multidisciplinary effort to bridge the gap between bench and bedside. To date, review articles have thoroughly covered different scientific facets of cartilage engineering paradigm, but surprisingly, little attention has been given to the preclinical considerations revolving around the validation of a biomaterial implant. Considering hydrogel-based cartilage products as an example, the present review endeavors to provide a summary of the critical prerequisites that such devices should meet for cartilage repair, for successful implantation and subsequent preclinical validation prior to clinical trials. Considerations pertaining to the choice of appropriate animal model, characterization techniques for the quantitative and qualitative outcome measures, as well as concerns with respect to GLP practices are also extensively discussed. This article is not meant to provide a systematic review, but rather to introduce a device validation-based roadmap to the academic investigator, in anticipation of future healthcare commercialization. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: There are significant challenges around translation of in vitro cartilage repair strategies to approved therapies. New biomaterial-based devices must undergo exhaustive investigations to ensure their safety and efficacy prior to clinical trials. These considerations are required to be applied from early developmental stages. Although there are numerous research works on cartilage devices and their in vivo evaluations, little attention has been given into the preclinical pathway and the corresponding approval processes. With a focus on hydrogel devices to concretely illustrate the preclinical path, this review paper intends to highlight the various considerations regarding the preclinical validation of hydrogel devices for cartilage repair, from regulatory considerations, to implantation strategies, device performance aspects and characterizations.

N-Acetyl Cysteine as an Add-on Therapy is Useful in Treating Acute Lumbar Radiculopathy Caused by Disc Herniation: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Available experimental and clinical evidence indicates that N-Acetyl cysteine (NAC) may have an analgesic role in specific pain conditions, particularly neuropathic pain. Thus, we hypothesized that NAC supplementation might be also helpful in decreasing pain and improving pain-related disability in patients with acute radiculopathy. We designed this study to investigate the potential use of NAC-adjunctive treatment to Nonsteroidal Anti- Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with acute radiculopathy secondary to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients diagnosed with acute lumbar radiculopathy associated with disc herniation were randomly allocated to the NAC or the placebo groups. Besides naproxen at a dose of 500 mg twice a day, participants based on their allocation group started with NAC or matched placebo at a dose of 600 mg twice a day for eight weeks. The pain severity, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pain-related disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 8 of treatment. Global improvement of symptoms rated by Patient and Clinical Global Impressions of Change (PGIC and CGIC) was also recorded at the end of week 8. All analyses were conducted on an Intentionto- Treat (ITT) analysis data set.

RESULTS

A comparison of the VAS and ODI scores at weeks 2 and 4 of the treatment between the two groups did not show a significant difference. In contrast, from week 4 to week 8, we noticed a significantly greater reduction in the mean VAS and ODI scores in the NAC group compared to the placebo group (p-value <0.001 for both variables). In parallel with these results, also, more NAC-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved treatment success defined as ''very much'' or ''much improved'' on CGIC and PGIC scales, and these differences reached a significant level (p-value = .011 and p-value = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that NAC might be a relevant candidate for adjunct therapy in managing acute lumbar radiculopathy. Additional clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

In vivo study of the role of hyaluronic acid, N-acetyl cysteine, and deproteinized calf serum on injury-induced cartilage degeneration

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of hyaluronic acid (HA), N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), and deproteinized calf serum on cartilage healing after the creation of traumatic cartilage injury in a rat model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 48 rats, each weighing an average of 350 g, were randomly separated into four groups of 12. An osteochondral defect was created, 2-mm-wide and 3-mm deep in each rat. Injections were made to the knees of the rats as saline solution in Group 1, deproteinized calf serum in Group 2, NAC in Group 3, and HA in Group 4. At the end of 12 weeks, all rats were sacrificed and tissues were evaluated histologically.

RESULTS

The HA group had a better cell morphology, tissue morphology, surface architecture, and vascularity than the other groups (p<0.001). Matrix staining, chondrocyte clustering, and the assessment scores of the mid, deep, superficial zones, and overall were higher in the HA group than in the other groups (p<0.001). The NAC showed a better tissue morphology, cell morphology, and vascularity than the control group (p=0.003, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Hyaluronic acid was the most effective agent in cartilage healing compared to NAC and deproteinized calf serum. In addition, the NAC was more effective compared to the control group.

A systematic review on the potential value of synovial fluid biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in cartilage repair treatments

OBJECTIVE

Multiple biochemical biomarkers have been previously investigated for the diagnosis, prognosis and response to treatment of articular cartilage damage, including osteoarthritis (OA). Synovial fluid (SF) biomarker measurement is a potential method to predict treatment response and effectiveness. However, the significance of different biomarkers and their correlation to clinical outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review evaluated current SF biomarkers used in investigation of cartilage degeneration or regeneration in the knee joint and correlated these biomarkers with clinical outcomes following cartilage repair or regeneration interventions.

METHOD

PubMed, Institute of Science Index, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases were searched. Studies evaluating SF biomarkers and clinical outcomes following cartilage repair intervention were included. Two researchers independently performed data extraction and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Score 2 (QUADAS-2) analysis. Biomarker inclusion, change following intervention and correlation with clinical outcome was compared.

RESULTS

9 studies were included. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. There was significant variation in sampling and analysis. 33 biomarkers were evaluated in addition to microRNA and catabolic/anabolic ratios. Five studies reported on correlation of biomarkers with six biomarkers significantly correlated with clinical outcomes following intervention. However, correlation was only demonstrated in isolated studies.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates significant difficulties in drawing conclusions regarding the importance of SF biomarkers based on the available literature. Improved standardisation for collection and analysis of SF samples is required. Future publications should also focus on clinical outcome scores and seek to correlate biomarkers with progression to further understand the significance of identified markers in a clinical context.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42022304298. Study protocol available on PROSPERO website.

Role and Effectiveness of Intra-articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that causes persistent joint pain and stiffness of mainly the large peripheral weight-bearing joints. It is a leading cause of functional disability and poor quality of life. Various modalities of therapy are recommended by different research organizations at different stages of OA including non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical interventions. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for over three decades in the treatment of OA. However controversies exist regarding its safety and efficacy, the number of injections and courses, type of preparation, duration of its effects, and combining it with other drugs or molecules. This study aimed to review the most recent data available in the published literature to address these. Electronic databases like Medline, Embase, ProQuest, and Google Scholar were searched for articles using keywords, intraarticular injections, hyaluronic acid, and osteoarthritis knee. The review was carried out as per PRISMA guidelines. Thirty-eight randomized control trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of HA were included in the systematic review. Out of the 38 studies, 22 (57.9%) were double-blind, eight (21%) single-blind, three (7.9%) non-blind, four (10%) with simple randomization, and one (2.7%) was open-labeled. Total 5,025 patients were included in these studies. The mean age of the patients was 60.28 years and the osteoarthritis grade of the knee joint was 1 to 3. HA was studied as a test preparation in 19 (50%) while in another 19 (50%) it was studied as a control. In 24 (63.2%) studies, HA was used as high molecular weight preparation in eight (21%) as low molecular weight preparation while in six studies the information was not available. HA was used as a standalone preparation in 31 studies, in two studies it was injected with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and with either low-level laser therapy (LLLT), triamcinolone (TA), betamethasone (CS), poly deoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) or dexamethasone (DX) in one study each. In the majority of the studies, HA was given as a single injection (52.6% studies) or weekly three injections (28.9% studies). In 13.2 %, it was given as weekly 5 injections and in 5.3% as weekly two injections. IA-HA injections have a limited role in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in those patients who do not have sufficient pain relief with topical or oral medication and physical therapy. It is safe and effective except for minor side effects such as local pain and swelling lasting for a few days. Severe allergic reactions are extremely rare. They provide adequate pain relief and functional improvement for up to six months irrespective of a number of injections and type of preparations used. The combination formulations with corticosteroids or PRP or MSCs show better results than HA alone. Combining HA with newer molecules such as peptides or diclofenac for sustained and disease-modifying effects requires more studies in the future.

Effects of N-acetylcysteine supplementation on disease activity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory and metabolic parameters in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Considering the importance of inflammation and oxidative stress in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as well as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant features of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), this study was conducted to evaluate the effect of NAC supplementation on disease activity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory and metabolic parameters in RA patients. In a randomized double-masked placebo-controlled trial, 74 RA subjects were chosen and randomly divided into two groups to take 600 mg of NAC or placebo twice daily for 3 months. Before and after the study, disease activity was assessed via disease activity score-28 (DAS-28), and serum malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity, nitric oxide (NO), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fasting blood sugar (FBS), lipid profile, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured. Seventy patients completed the trial. Compared to baseline, NAC significantly reduced morning stiffness (P < 0.001), DAS-28 (P < 0.001), ESR (P = 0.004), MDA (P < 0.001), NO (P < 0.001), hs-CRP (P = 0.006), FBS (P < 0.001), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (P = 0.023) and significantly increased GPx activity (P = 0.015) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level (P = 0.001). After treatment, remarkable differences were only seen between the two groups in serum NO (P = 0.003), FBS (P = 0.010), and HDL-C (P < 0.001) adjusted for baseline measures. There were no significant changes in morning stiffness, DAS-28, ESR, hs-CRP, MDA, TAC, GPx activity, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and LDL-C levels compared to the placebo group. In conclusion, NAC did not improve RA disease activity, but reduced NO and FBS and increased HDL-C levels. It appears that NAC should not be consumed as a replacement for routine medications prescribed in RA therapy, but it can be used as an adjunctive therapy.

Intra-articular Injection of Type I Atelocollagen to Alleviate Knee Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Collagen disruption is one of the underlying causes of knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis and/or diverse cartilage defects. Atelocollagen is a type of collagen that lacks telopeptides and thus has reduced antigenicity. The intra-articular injection of type I atelocollagen supplements collagen levels in the disrupted articular cartilage. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of the intra-articular injection of atelocollagen for the management of knee pain.

DESIGN

Two hundred patients with osteoarthritis, chondromalacia, or other cartilage defects were randomly assigned to receive a 3-mL intra-articular injection of atelocollagen (BioCollagen group) or saline (Placebo group). Clinical improvement was evaluated over a 24-week period using the 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

VAS scores were significantly better in the BioCollagen group as compared with the Placebo group at 24 weeks. More patients in the BioCollagen group reported exceeding 20% and 40% VAS improvements. The WOMAC and SF-36 scores were also significantly improved from baseline after the intra-articular injection of atelocollagen; although, the differences between the BioCollagen and Placebo groups were not significant. There were no unexpected or severe adverse events reported for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that an intra-articular injection of atelocollagen effectively alleviates knee pain, as intended. Therefore, the intra-articular injection of atelocollagen can be considered an alternative solution to controlling knee pain due to osteoarthritis and diverse cartilage defects.

The protective role of glutathione in osteoarthritis

It is currently understood that osteoarthritis (OA) is a major chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease. While this disease has long been attributed to biomechanical trauma, recent evidence establishes a significant correlation between osteoarthritic progression and unbridled oxidative stress, responsible for prolonged inflammation. Research describes this as a disturbance in the balanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defenses, generating macromolecular damage and disrupted redox signaling and control. Since ROS pathways are being considered new targets for OA treatment, the development of antioxidant therapy to counteract exacerbated oxidative stress is being continuously researched and enhanced in order to fortify the cellular defenses. Experiments with glutathione and its precursor molecule, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), have shown interesting results in the literature for the management of OA, where they have demonstrated efficacy in reducing cartilage degradation and inflammation markers as well as significant improvements in pain and functional outcomes. Glutathione remains a safe, effective and overall cheap treatment alternative in comparison to other current therapeutic solutions and, for these reasons, it may prove to be comparably superior under particular circumstances.

METHODS

Literature was reviewed using PubMed and Google Scholar in order to bring up significant evidence and illustrate the defensive mechanisms of antioxidant compounds against oxidative damage in the onset of musculoskeletal diseases. The investigation included a combination of keywords such as: oxidative stress, oxidative damage, inflammation, osteoarthritis, antioxidant, glutathione, n-acetylcysteine, redox, and cell signaling.

CONCLUSION

Based on the numerous studies included in this literature review, glutathione and its precursor N-acetylcysteine have demonstrated significant protective effects in events of prolonged, exacerbated oxidative stress as seen in chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in osteoarthritis (OA) knee: Correct dose critical for long term clinical efficacy

Despite encouraging results reported with regards to Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) application in osteoarthritis (OA) knee, still critical issues like conclusive structural evidence of its efficacy, standard dose and good manual method of preparation to obtain high yield remains unanswered. Present study is an attempt to optimise the dose and concentration of therapeutic PRP and its correlation with structural, physiologic efficacy with a new manual method of PRP preparation. A total of one hundred and fifty patients were randomized to receive either PRP (10 billion platelets) or hyaluronic acid (HA; 4 ml; 75 patients in each group) and followed up till 1 year. An addition of filtration step with 1 µm filter in manual PRP processing improved platelet recovery upto 90%. Significant improvements in WOMAC (51.94 ± 7.35 vs. 57.33 ± 8.92; P < 0.001), IKDC scores (62.8 ± 6.24 vs 52.7 ± 6.39; P < 0.001), 6-min pain free walking distance (+ 120 vs. + 4; P < 0.001) persisted in PRP compared to HA group at 1 year. Significant decline IL-6 and TNF-α levels observed in PRP group (P < 0.05) compared to HA at 1 month. Study demonstrated that an absolute count of 10 billion platelets is crucial in a PRP formulation to have long sustained chondroprotective effect upto one year in moderate knee OA.

Temporomandibular joint injections in dogs with temporomandibular joint pain: 11 cases (2015-2019)

OBJECTIVES

To describe and evaluate the clinical application of temporomandibular joint injections using betamethasone and ropivacaine in German Shepherd dogs suffering from non-odontogenic orofacial pain due to temporomandibular dysplasia and/or osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes in dogs presented with clinical signs of non-odontogenic orofacial pain associated to temporomandibular joint dysplasia and/or arthritis and treated with a temporomandibular joint injection were retrospectively-prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall clinical signs free period ranged between 25 to 1579 days, with an average of 461 days. The clinical signs free period for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis scores 1, 2 and 3 were on average 659 days (180-1579 days), 134 days (42-355 days) and 723 days (25-1377 days), respectively. Similarly the temporomandibular dysplasia scores 1, 2 and 3 were on average 306 days (26-1579 days), 1377 days and 669 days (25-1429 days) respectively. Those dogs in which only one side was injected the clinical signs free period average was 639 days (25-1578 days), compared with dogs in which both temporomandibular joints were injected showing a clinical signs free period average of 378 days (42-1377 days).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The temporomandibular joint injection technique proved to be feasible with a decent outcome in dogs suffering from non-odontogenic orofacial pain associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and/or dysplasia. Further randomised studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of this intervention.

Increased risk of knee osteoarthritis in patients using oral N-acetylcysteine: a nationwide cohort study

Background

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is known to be a progressive degenerative disorder; however, recent evidence suggests that inflammatory mediators contribute to cartilage degradation. Studies have reported that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) had a promising effect on the reduction of the synthesis of proinflammatory and structural mediators by synovial cells. Given the lack of relevant clinical trials, we conducted this study to determine the relationship between NAC use and risk of knee OA.

Methods

We designed a retrospective cohort study from 2000 to 2013. Patients who received oral NAC over 28 days within 1 year after the first prescription were defined as the case group, whereas those without NAC use were considered as candidates of the control group. We adopted 1:4 propensity-score matching by age, sex, index year, and comorbidities to obtain the control group. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of knee OA during the follow-up period.

Results

Our study sample comprised 12,928 people who used NAC and 51,715 NAC nonusers. NAC users had a significantly higher incidence of osteoarthritis (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42, P < .001) than did NAC nonusers. Also, in analyses stratified by age group and sex, all subgroups exhibited a significantly higher incidence of knee osteoarthritis (P < .0001) among NAC users than among NAC nonusers. The use of oral NAC was associated with nearly four-fold increased the risk of knee OA in the young age group.

Conclusions

Long-term use of oral NAC is associated with a higher risk of knee OA.

Injections intra articulaires (IA) d'acide hyaluronique (AH) dans le traitement symptomatique de la gonarthrose : une méta-analyse des injections uniques (mono-injections)

Introduction

La viscosupplémentation du liquide synovial par injections intra articulaires (IA) d'acide hyaluronique (AH), est un traitement symptomatique bien connu dans la gonarthrose. La question se pose de savoir si les traitements par injection unique (mono-injection) peuvent présenter autant d'efficacité que les multi-injections (3 à 5).

Méthodes

Une méta-analyse des résultats publiés pour les essais de mono-injections IA de AH a été réalisée. Le critère d'efficacité retenu a été le sous-score douleur de l'indice Western Ontario and MacMaster universities (WOMAC A). Toutes les conceptions d'études ont été admises, depuis les essais randomisés contrôlés jusqu'aux études observationnelles ouvertes à simple bras. Une recherche extensive a été effectuée à partir de PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, et des listes de références trouvées dans les méta-analyses récentes, pour obtenir tous les articles publiés avant fin avril 2018. Les profils des populations furent analysés en termes d'âge, de sexe, d'indice de masse corporelle (IMC) et de stade radiologique selon Kellgren-Lawrence (KL). Les résultats d'injection IA unique de placebo, ont été pris en compte pour créer une base permettant des comparaisons post-hoc. Chaque bras AH IA étudié a été comparé à un bras placebo IA (seul ou mixé), de manière à présenter un profil KL similaire, contrôlé à l'aide du test Chi². Les tailles de l'effet (ES) avec intervalles de confiance (IC 95%) et p-valeurs furent calculées et synthétisées pour chacune des visites de contrôle à 1, 2, 3 et 6 mois. En parallèle, une approche globale a été utilisée afin de représenter les variations par rapport à la baseline, pour chacun des sous-groupes étudiés.

Résultats

En partant de 1 547 citations, 28 études ont été incluses dans la méta-analyse, décrivant 4 129 patients traités par mono-injection: 3 360 ont reçu de l'AH IA et 769 patients ont reçu du placebo IA. Le patient moyen (SD) traité par AH IA était âgé de 61,2 (9,6) ans dont 63% de femmes, avec un IMC de 28,0 (4,1) kg/m², et un stade radiologique à 47% KL III pour 3% KL IV. Un bon appariement du profil KL a été obtenu pour 26 des 31 bras AH IA. Sur l'ensemble de la population AH IA, ES = 0,30 (0,25; 0,35) à 3 mois et ES = 0,39 (0,33; 0,44) à 6 mois. Dans une analyse restreinte, après élimination des cas aberrants, des KL mal appariés et des bras actifs < 30 patients, les résultats sont restés inchangés, ES = 0,29 (0,23; 0,34) et ES = 0,40 (0,34; 0,45) à 3 et 6 mois respectivement, tandis que l'hétérogénéité était améliorée.

Discussion

Il existe certainement des limites à la méthode de comparaison post-hoc versus placebo, appliquée à des essais individuels. Mais pour chaque synthèse par sous-groupe ou groupe, les résultats ont été confirmés en utilisant plusieurs approches statistiques et différentes méthodes de pondération. Cette méta-analyse suggère que les résultats des mono-injections sont similaires à ceux des multi-injections d'acide hyaluronique intra articulaire en termes de soulagement de la douleur, dans le traitement de la gonarthrose.

Initial Harm Reduction by N-Acetylcysteine Alleviates Cartilage Degeneration after Blunt Single-Impact Cartilage Trauma in Vivo

Joint injuries are highly associated with the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Previous studies revealed cell- and matrix-protective effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) after ex vivo cartilage trauma, while chondroanabolic stimulation with bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP7) enhanced type II collagen (COL2) expression. Here, as a next step, we investigated the combined and individual efficacy of intra-articular antioxidative and chondroanabolic treatment in a rabbit in vivo cartilage trauma model. Animals were randomly divided into group A (right joint: trauma (T); left joint: T+BMP7) and group B (right joint: T+NAC; left joint: T+BMP7+NAC). Condyles were impacted with the use of a spring-loaded impact device to ensure defined, single trauma administration. After 12 weeks, histopathological analysis was performed and the presence of matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13) and COL2 was assessed. Trauma-induced hypocellularity, MMP-13 expression, and cell cluster formation were reduced in NAC-treated animals. In contrast, BMP7 further increased cluster formation. Moreover, synovial concentrations of COL2 carboxy propeptide (CPII) and proteoglycan staining intensities were enhanced in NAC- and NAC+BMP7-treated joints. For the first time, the efficacy of NAC regarding early harm reduction after blunt cartilage trauma was demonstrated in vivo. However, parallel administration of BMP7 was not significantly superior compared to NAC alone.

Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid in the Symptomatic Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Injection Products

Background

Viscosupplementation of the synovial fluid with intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA HA) is a well-known symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The question arises whether a monoinjection (ie, single injection) could be as efficient as multi-injection (ie, 3-5 injections) regimens.

Methods

A meta-analysis of published studies relating to IA HA monoinjection trials was performed. The efficacy criterion was the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities pain subscore. Any study design was accepted, from randomized control trials to single-arm observational open-label studies. An extensive search was performed using PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and references found in recent meta-analyses, for all articles published before end of April 2018. Population profiles were analyzed in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) radiology grades. Results of intra-articular single injection of placebo were collected to create a database allowing post hoc comparisons. Each IA HA study arm was compared to an IA placebo arm (either pooled or not), to present a similar KL profile controlled with the χ² test. The effect size (ES) (95% CI) and P values were calculated and synthesized for each follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. In parallel, a global approach was used to represent the variations from baseline for each group or subgroup studied.

Results

From 1547 citations, 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 4129 patients treated with monoinjection: 3360 received IA HA and 769 patients received IA placebo. The mean (SD) IA HA patient was 61.2 (9.6) years, 63% women, BMI 28.0 (4.1), 47% KL III, and 3% KL IV. A good placebo KL profile matching was obtained for 26 of the 31 IA HA arms. For the whole IA HA population, ES = 0.30 (95% CI, 0.25-0.35) at 3 months and ES = 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33-0.44) at 6 months. In a restricted analysis, after removal of outliers, poorly KL matched and active arms <30 patients, results remained unchanged, ES = 0.29 (95% CI, 0.23-0.34) and ES = 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.45) at 3 and 6 months respectively, whilst heterogeneity was improved.

Conclusions

There are certainly limits to the post hoc placebo comparison method, for individual studies. But for each synthesis per subgroup or group, the results were properly confirmed using multiple statistical approaches and weighing methods. This meta-analysis suggests that monoinjections produce results similar to multi-injections of IA HA in terms of pain relief in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019; 80:XXX-XXX).

Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: biomarkers (biochemical markers)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this narrative review is to summarize important findings from biochemical marker studies relevant to osteoarthritis (OA) in the context of new discoveries and clinical and scientific need.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic search of electronic medical databases (Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane central) between 01-03-2017 and 31-03-2018. The search was restricted to human studies, English language and full text available publications while reviews were excluded. Only papers describing protein based biomarkers measured in human body fluids (blood, urine and synovial fluid (SF)) were included. Of the 992 papers, 86 were reviewed here, with inclusion primarily based on relevance to OA biochemical markers.

RESULTS

This review highlights a selection of studies based on their quality and perceived importance to the field mainly including those that¹ evaluate prognostic value of biomarkers for OA progression (i.e., biomarkers reflecting change in composition of joint tissues and biomarkers of inflammation)², help in assessment of intervention efficacy, and³ are innovative and uncover new candidate biomarkers, or use new approaches in biomarker discovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Key findings and implications for possible clinical utility of biochemical markers are summarized and discussed. Given the paucity of robust biomarkers within the field, and the heterogeneity of the condition, enormous works are needed for development and validation of novel and clinically applicable biomarkers to reduce the impact of this highly prevalent and debilitating condition.