Outpatient allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a review

Outpatient Management of Patients Conditioned with Fludarabine and Treosulfan prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with myeloablative conditioning traditionally requires 30 days of hospitalization after stem cell infusion. However, advancements in supportive and prophylactic care have allowed for a trend toward outpatient management of allo-HCT, potentially leading to improved patient quality of life and increased cost-effectiveness of the procedure. In 2014, fludarabine and treosulfan (FluTreo) conditioning was introduced as a myeloablative regimen with reduced toxicity at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet (CUH). After gaining experience with the regimen, an outpatient program was established. Here we share the outcomes of outpatient conditioning with FluTreo allo-HCT at CUH. This study was conducted to investigate the safety and feasibility of outpatient FluTreo allo-HCT, as well as to investigate the potentially improved cost-effectiveness of outpatient allo-HCT primarily through a reduction in hospital length of stay compared to the 30 days of hospitalization associated with standard myeloablative conditioning. This retrospective study included all patients undergoing FluTreo allo-HCT due to malignant diseases (n = 124) at CUH between 2018 and 2022. Patients received outpatient treatment (n = 91) unless certain circumstances necessitated planned hospitalization (n = 33). As conditioning, patients received i.v. fludarabine 90 mg/m2 and treosulfan either 30 or 42 g/m2. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The median duration of hospitalization in the outpatient group was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 12.5 days) from day -6 to day +28 compared to a median of 28 days (IQR, 26 to 34 days) in the inpatient group. Thirty-two patients (35%) in the outpatient group did not require hospitalization before day +28 post-transplantation. The remaining 59 patients (65%) were hospitalized after a median of 12 days (IQR, 7 to 16 days) from the start of conditioning, with a median stay of 10 days (IQR, 5 to 18 days). The outpatient group required significantly less i.v. antibiotics, i.v. opioids, and parenteral nutrition compared to the inpatient group, despite no differences in treatment toxicity, acute graft-versus-host disease, or relapse between the groups. The outpatient group experienced no early deaths during the first 3 months after transplantation, and 1-year nonrelapse mortality was 6%. Outpatient allo-HCT with FluTreo conditioning is feasible and safe in a selected group of patients, significantly reducing hospitalization days without compromising patient outcomes. Outpatient FluTreo allo-HCT potentially provides a more cost-effective and patient-friendly alternative compared to traditional in-patient management.

[Setting up haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation in low- and middle-income countries: The Recommendations of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Nowadays, haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) has been routinely used worldwide. However, this procedure is still rarely proposed in low- or middle-income countries. During the 13th annual harmonization workshops of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), a designated working group has proposed recommendations on how to set up such a transplantation in these countries. This was based on a review of the literature and expert-opinion as well as the previously published workshop on haplo-HCT of SFGM-TC (2016). Haploidentical donors appear to be a first alternative to HLA-matched siblings since the access to unrelated donor international registries are limited for several countries. While the procedure has the advantage of immediate access to several potential donors and of low cost, Haplo-HCT should be performed only in centers with a good experience of HLA-matched related transplantation (>10/year). In the absence of an HLA-matched related donor, haplo-HCT should be offered to all patients who are candidate for allo-HCT. Transplantation modalities should follow the conventional procedures with post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis. Conditioning can be myeloablative or not according to each case. Our recommendations are intended to be general in scope and applicable to the majority of allo-HCT centers in these countries. An evaluation at regular basis is needed to assess the feasibility and to improve results.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia can be fully treated on an outpatient basis: a single institution experience

The objective of this study is to explore the possibility of treating APL patients fully as outpatients. A total of 21 consecutive APL patients were identified over 30 years in the Centro de Hematología y Medicina Interna de Puebla, at Clínica Ruiz, but only 17 were studied, treated as outpatients, and followed for at least 1 month; they were observed for median of 95 months, their median age was 27 years and all were treated with ATRA, prednisone, and adriamycin as outpatients. Treatment was completed on an outpatient basis in 15/17 cases. Molecular remission was achieved in 16/17 patients. The median follow-up was 95 months (IQR 19 - 360). The median OS and LFS were not reached, and the 12-month LFS was 94%. We have confirmed that APL can be treated entirely on an outpatient basis: this observation is of utmost relevance in a resource-limited setting, such as those prevailing in low- and middle-income countries.

A comparison of haploidentical versus HLA-identical sibling outpatient hematopoietic cell transplantation using reduced intensity conditioning in patients with acute leukemia

Background

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) increases survival for acute leukemia. Outpatient allogeneic HCT reduces costs and increases transplant rates in developing countries. We report outcomes of outpatient HLA-identical and haploidentical HCT in acute leukemia.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 121 adult patients with acute myeloblastic (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving an outpatient allogeneic HCT with peripheral blood allografts after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) from 2012-2022.

Results

There were 81 (67%) haploidentical and 40 (33%) HLA-identical transplants. Complete chimerism (CC) at day +100 was not different in HLA-identical compared to haploidentical HCT (32.5% and 38.2%, P=0.054). Post-HCT complications, including neutropenic fever (59.3% vs. 40%), acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) (46.9% vs. 25%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (18.5% vs. 2.5%), and hospitalization (71.6% vs 42.5%) were significantly more frequent in haploidentical HCT. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 60.6% vs. 46.9%, (P=0.464) for HLA-identical and haplo-HCT, respectively. There was no difference in the 2-year disease-free-survival (DFS) (33.3% vs. 35%, P=0.924) between transplant types. In multivariate analysis, positive measurable residual disease (MRD) at 30 days (HR 8.8, P=0.018) and 100 days (HR 28.5, P=0.022) was associated with lower OS, but not with non-relapse mortality (NRM) (P=0.252 and P=0.123, univariate). In univariate analysis, both 30-day and 100-day MRD were associated with lower DFS rates (P=0.026 and P=0.006), but only day 30 MRD was significant in multivariate analysis (P=0.050). In the case of relapse, only MRD at day 100 was associated with increased risk in the univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 4.48, P=0.003 and HR 4.67, P=0.008). Chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) was protective for NRM (HR 0.38, P=0.015). There was no difference in cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) between transplant types (P=0.126). Forty-four (36.4%) patients died, with no difference between HCT type (P=0.307). Septic shock was the most frequent cause of death with 17 cases, with no difference between transplant types.

Conclusions

Outpatient peripheral blood allogenic HCT after RIC is a valid and effective alternative for adult patients suffering acute myeloblastic or lymphoblastic leukemia in low-income populations.

Increasing access to transplantation through telemedicine and patient navigation

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a promising treatment for hematological diseases, yet access barriers like cost and limited transplant centers persist. Telemedicine-based patient navigation (PN) has emerged as a solution. This study presents a cost-free PN telemedicine clinic (TC) in collaboration with the National Marrow Donor Program.

AIM

to assess its feasibility and impac on HCT access determined by the cumulative incidence of transplantation.

METHODS

In this single-center cohort study, patients of all ages and diagnoses referred for HCT participated. Two transplant physician-navigators established patient relationships via video calls, collecting medical history, offering HCT education and recommending pretransplant tests. The analysis involved descriptive statistics and intent-to-transplant survival assessment.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were included of whom n = 78 were referred for allogeneic HCT (alloHCT), with a median age of 28 years. The median time from initial contact to the first consult was 5 days. The cumulative incidence of transplantation was 50% at 6 months and 61% at 12 months, with varying outcomes based on HCT type. Notably, 49 patients were not transplanted, primarily due to refractory disease, progression or relapse (57.1%). Autologous HCT candidates and physician referrals were correlated with higher transplant success compared to alloHCT candidates and patients who were not referred by a physician.

CONCLUSION

Our pretransplant TC was feasible, facilitating access to HCT. Disease relapse posed a significant barrier. Enhancing timely physician referrals should be a focus for future efforts.

Impact of payment source, referral site, and place of residence on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation in Mexico

BACKGROUND

The impact of social determinants of health in allogeneic transplant recipients in low- and middle-income countries is poorly described. This observational study analyzes the impact of place of residence, referring institution, and transplant cost coverage (out-of-pocket vs government-funded vs private insurance) on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in two of Mexico's largest public and private institutions.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of social determinants of health and their relationship with outcomes among allogeneic transplant recipients in Mexico.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included adolescents and adults ≥ 16 years who received a matched sibling or haploidentical transplant from 2015-2022. Participants were selected without regard to their diagnosis and were sourced from both a private clinic and a public University Hospital in Mexico. Three payment groups were compared: Out-of-pocket (OOP), private insurance, and a federal Universal healthcare program "Seguro Popular". Outcomes were compared between referred and institution-diagnosed patients, and between residents of Nuevo Leon and out-of-state. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), categorized by residence, referral, and payment source. Secondary outcomes encompassed early mortality, event-free-survival, graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival, and non-relapse-mortality (NRM). Statistical analyses employed appropriate tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Statistical software included SPSS and R with tidycmprsk library.

RESULTS

Our primary outcome was overall survival. We included 287 patients, n = 164 who lived out of state (57.1%), and n = 129 referred from another institution (44.9%). The most frequent payment source was OOP (n = 139, 48.4%), followed by private insurance (n = 75, 26.1%) and universal coverage (n = 73, 25.4%). No differences in OS, event-free-survival, NRM, or graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival were observed for patients diagnosed locally vs in another institution, nor patients who lived in-state vs out-of-state. Patients who covered transplant costs through private insurance had the best outcomes with improved OS (median not reached) and 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM of 14% than patients who covered costs OOP (Median OS and 2-year NRM of 32%) or through a universal healthcare program active during the study period (OS and 2-year NRM of 19%) (P = 0.024 and P = 0.002, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, payment source and disease risk index were the only factors associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In this Latin-American multicenter study, the site of residence or referral for alloHSCT did not impact outcomes. However, access to healthcare coverage for alloHSCT was associated with improved OS and reduced NRM.

Second Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Center Prospective Experience

Immunosuppressive therapy is useful in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is the most effective immunosuppressive treatment in this setting. Information on the usefulness of a second aHSCT in patients with MS is scarce. In a group of 1225 individuals with MS prospectively managed with aHSCT, we analyzed the salient features of 4 patients who received 2 consecutive transplants. After a moderate initial response to the first aHSCT, the patients were transplanted again after deterioration of their neurologic status; the second transplant was well tolerated and, in all instances, was completed on an outpatient basis and with no associated undesired toxicity. The autograft protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02674217. After the second graft, the expanded disability status scale score stabilized in 2 patients; in 1, the post-transplant period was too short to assess the response, and in another, the development of associated Parkinson's disease precluded the assessment of the outcome. In conclusion, a second aHSCT in persons with MS is feasible, safe, and may lead to a positive response in some cases.

Acute myeloid leukemia: challenges for diagnosis and treatment in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.

Conducting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in low and middle income countries

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-recognized therapeutic procedure; costs limit its widespread use in low and middle income countries (LMIC).

METHODS

Over a 30-year period, we have conducted HSCT in LMIC, making adaptations to the conventional procedures conducted in high-income countries (HIC).

RESULTS

These salient observations stem from our practice: (1) Start with autologous transplantations in patients with hematological malignancies, specifically multiple myeloma; cell freezing devices are not necessary. (2) Next, consider auto-HSCT in patients with autoimmune diseases. (3) Introduce allogeneic transplants, initially using reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Conducting the HSCT on an outpatient basis is cheaper and safer. (4) Do not build HEPA-filtered rooms nor laminar flow cabins. (5) Do not graft cord blood cells nor start a cord blood blank. (6) Engage in haploidentical transplantations which are more feasible and cost-effective. (7) Matched unrelated donors are extremely expensive. (8) Use generic drugs and biosimilars. (9) Blood product irradiation devices are not necessary. (10) Do not try to reproduce other HSCT programs from HIC; develop your own methods.

CONCLUSIONS

HSCT can be conducted in LMIC with reduced costs and similar efficacy, thus making this therapeutic option affordable for more persons.