The use of qualitative cultures for detecting infection in open tibial fractures

A Prospective Comparative Study of Pre-debridement and Post-debridement Cultures in Open Fractures of the Extremities

Introduction Amputations and recurrent infections are two terrible outcomes of open fractures that can leave patients with permanent impairments. Rapid and effective treatment can protect patients from open fracture sequelae and the long-term financial burden these injuries frequently cause. Over 50% of open fractures are caused by high energy trauma, which most frequently happens in car accidents or severe falls. There hasn't been much research done on the first bacterial ecology of open fracture wounds in the Indian environment. Therefore, the need of the current assignment was to assess the effectiveness of pre-debridement and post-debridement culture in open fractures of the extremities. Methodology A prospective comparative study was carried out with 65 patients who were hospitalized from the OPD and Emergency departments at the R. L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Center. The time frame of study was between December 2020 and July 2022. Prior to the trial, each participant's written informed consent was obtained and strict protocol was followed in accordance with the Institutional Ethics Committee. Results Among the study participants, the majority of cases (26.15%) belonged to the 21-30 years of age group. A total of 14 participants belonged to the 41-50 years of age group. Out of the total, nine patients were aged less than 20 years. Out of the total, in pre-debridement culture the majority of cases had presence of growth of Staphylococcus aureus followed by Acinetobacter species, Enterobacter species and Pseudomonas species. Only six patients had growth of Klebsiella species. After debridement and treatment for bacterial infection, on subsequent culture examination, no growth was found among 61 patients. Although in four patients, there was presence of Pseudomonas species, Enterobacter species and Proteus microorganisms. Conclusion Although the validity of sequential cultures has been questioned in a number of investigations, this study has demonstrated that debridement cultures have a significant impact in postoperative infection. Debridement culture is therefore advised to offer information about the selection of antimicrobial medication, which when paired with a complete wound debridement will permit an early wound closure and better overall outcome functionally.

Bacterial infection and antibiotic resistance pattern in open fracture cases in Indonesia

Background

The annual incidence of open fracture in Dr Soetomo Hospital, East Java were 400 cases with chronic infection complications exist in 14% (57 cases). A previous study in this hospital shows the resistance rate of Pseudomonas towards cefazolin and amikacin was 100% and 15%, respectively. The objective of this study was to identify bacterial infection type and antibiotic resistance pattern in infection caused by the open fracture.

Methods

This was an analytic cross-sectional study. Samples were collected from three debridement surgery sites in Mataram Hospital, Mataram University Hospital, and Islamic Mataram Hospital from September 2019 until October 2020. Specimens from wound infection were cultured, and an antibiotic sensitivity test was performed.

Results

Approximately 213 samples were analyzed in this study, comprising open fracture grade 3A (45%) and 3B (39%). The majority of fractures were lower extremity fractures (62%). Bacterial infection were found in 35% cases (80 isolates) in which 62,5% (50 isolates) were gram-positive bacteria and 37,5% (30 isolates) were gram-negative bacteria. Infection in open fracture was equivalent to grading. The predominant bacterial infection was caused by gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus negative coagulase. Gram-positive bacteria were sensitive towards Cepoferazone, Sulbactam and Ofloxacin, whereas gram-negative bacteria remains sensitive against Doxicyclin and Amicasin.

Conclusion

Infection in open fracture was equivalent with the grade, and gram-positive were predominantly sensitive with cefoperazone sulbactam.

•

This study was to identify bacterial infection type and antibiotic resistance pattern in infection caused by the open fracture.

•

This was an analytic cross-sectional study.

•

The predominant bacterial infection was caused by gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus negative coagulase.

•

Infection in open fracture was equivalent with the grade, and gram-positive were predominantly sensitive with cefoperazone sulbactam.

Definitive fixation of open tibia fractures: Does reopening the traumatic wound increase complication rates?

BACKGROUND

It is unknown if surgical approach or use of previous traumatic wounds for open fracture instrumentation has an impact on patient complications or outcomes. This study sought to compare infection and nonunion rates in the staged treatment of open tibia fractures where the traumatic wound was reopened during definitive fixation versus when they were not.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients at a single institution level 1 trauma center. All patients who had a minimum of 1 year clinical and radiographic outcomes were included. Primary outcome measures were incidence of infection and nonunion. Groups of patients were compared based on surgical approach for definitive fixation.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included - 48 patients received definitive treatment and wound closure during initial management of the open fracture (group 1), 22 patients had staged fixation through new incisions (group 2), and 26 patients had their traumatic wound reopened during definitive fixation (group 3). Rates of infection were 10.4%, 31.8% and 11.5% respectively (p = 0.15). Rates of nonunion were 20.8%, 27.3% and 30.8% (p = 1.0). No statistically significant differences in regards to primary outcomes were found between the staged fixation groups. Multiple logistic regression also showed no difference in infection or nonunion when controlling for known risk factors.

CONCLUSION

For open tibia fractures that underwent staged fixation, no significant differences in infection or nonunion were observed between procedures that involved reopening the traumatic wound versus procedures performed through new incisions. The presence of a distal tibia periarticular fracture was found to be independently associated with infection risk.

A Comparative Study of Bacteriological Culture Results Using Swab and Tissue in Open Fractures: A Pilot Study

Introduction:

The role of perioperative cultures to identify infection in open fractures has been doubtful. The method of sampling for cultures in open fractures includes swab or tissue collection. However, the efficacy of either of these two techniques has not been compared in the setting of an acute open fracture. We conducted a study to compare the bacteriological culture results between the two techniques.

Methodology:

A pilot study was done at our institution, where all type 2, 3A, and 3B open fractures admitted in the emergency and operated for debridement and stabilization were included in the study. Intraoperatively, after debridement of the wound, swab and tissue specimens were collected and sent to the same laboratory. The results of the cultures were then collected for comparison after the necessary incubation period. Follow-up of outpatient records was also done to see its clinical significance.

Results:

A total of 30 samples of swab and tissue cultures collected post-debridement of acute open fractures in the operation theater were studied. Only 13 samples grew an organism either in swab/tissue culture or both. Nine tissue samples and eight swab samples showed growth. In four cases, both swab and tissue showed growth, but the same organism grew in only one instance. The other three cases showing growth in both tissue and swab had different organisms. Statistically, the kappa coefficient was found to be 0.26 and the agreement between swab and tissue culture was found fair. However, the kappa did not account for the species of the organisms. Tissue samples showed more number of specific organism growing in them, compared to swab culture samples.

Conclusion:

The ideal technique of taking samples for culture in acute open fractures is uncertain. Tissue culture may be better in isolating specific organisms in an acute open fracture wound. However, it is uncertain if the same organism may cause infection.

A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare Conventional and Evidence Based Treatment Protocols in Fresh Compound Fractures

INTRODUCTION

A recent concept review in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) outlines evidence to control peri-operative infections in compound fractures. However, evidence for impact of adopting a protocol combining measures that have some evidence is lacking in literature. The present method of treatment at King George's Medical University (KGMU) is representative of the conventional practice of managing compound fractures in India and is an appropriate control for trial against the Experimental Evidence Based Protocol (EBP).

AIM

To study the additional impact of adopting Evidence Based Protocol on parameters defining infection rate and bone union.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled study was conducted at the orthopaedics department of KGMU. Two hundred and twenty six patients of compound fractures of both bone leg, age > 12y were randomized to two groups. One group received standard treatment and the experimental group received treatment as per JBJS review.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Random allocation was tested by comparing baseline characteristics of the two groups. The two groups were compared for all the outcome variables in terms of time to a negative wound culture, time to wound healing, time to union at fracture site and time to achieve complete range of motion at knee joint.

RESULTS

Random allocation was successful. EBP group reported significantly lesser time to a negative culture report from wound (mean in conventional=4.619, experimental=1.9146, p=0.0006), lesser time to bony union (mean in conventional=23.8427 weeks, experimental=22.8125 weeks, p=0.0027), lesser time to wound healing (mean in conventional=14.4425 weeks experimental=10.4513 weeks, p=0.0032), and a lesser duration of hospital stay (mean in conventional=6.5982 days, experimental=4.5000 days, p=0.0343).

CONCLUSION

EBP based on the guidelines suggested by Fletcher et al., significantly shorten the time taken for achieving a negative culture and hasten wound and fracture healing. Therefore EBP is recommended for use in settings like the KGMU trauma center.

Predebridement wound culture in open fractures does not predict postoperative wound infection: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

There is confusion in the current literature regarding the value of obtaining predebridement wound cultures in the management of open fractures with several studies reporting contrasting results. We undertook a pilot study to determine the initial bacterial flora of open fractures in our environment and determine the correlation between subsequent wound infection if any, and the initial bacterial flora.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initial/predebridement wound swabs were obtained for 32 patients with open fractures. Patients underwent a debridement of the open wound and preliminary stabilization of fracture in the operating room within 24 h. Postdebridement wound cultures were obtained at 48 h and repeated subsequently, if indicated, during the follow-up period. The antibiotic therapy was modified based on the culture reports.

RESULTS

Initial wound swab culture showed bacterial contamination in 18 patients (56%); 14 patients (44%) developed an infection in the immediate postoperative period or during follow-up. Age, gender, co-morbid medical condition, delay in presentation, and grade of open fracture were not found to be predictors of postoperative infection. No patient had an infection with the same organism, which was present in the initial culture.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that the initial flora are not the infecting organisms in the open fracture wounds, and predebridement wound cultures have no value in predicting postdebridement wound infection.

The ortho-plastic approach to soft tissue management in trauma

Fractures with associated soft tissue injuries, or those termed 'open,' are not uncommon. There has been much discussion regarding there management, with the guidance from the combined British Orthopaedic Association and British Association and Aesthetic Surgeons teams widely accepted as the gold level of therapy. We aim to discuss the current evidence about the initial management of this group of injuries, taking a journey from arrival in the accident and emergency department through to the point of definitive closure. Other modes of therapy are also reviewed.

Compliance with the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines for prophylactic antibiotics after open extremity fracture

CONTEXT

Prophylactic antibiotics, paired with wound care and surgical intervention, is considered the standard of care for patients with open fracture. Guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) recommend specific prophylactic antimicrobial therapy based on the type of open fracture.

AIMS

We quantified adherence to EAST guideline recommendations and documented the incidence of infection in patients with open fracture.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A retrospective, observational study of all patients with open fracture admitted to our facility from January 2004 to December 2008 was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into compliant and noncompliant groups according to the EAST guideline recommendations. Compliance was defined as an appropriate spectrum of therapy for guideline suggested duration. We assessed for surgical and non-surgical site infections, and morbidity outcomes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Nominal data were explored using summary measures. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test. Dichotomous data were compared using χ(2) statistic or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 214 patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were guideline compliant in 28.5% of patients, and ranged from 10.0% in type 3b fractures to 52.7% in type 1 fractures. The most common reason for non-compliance was the use of guideline recommended coverage that exceeded the suggested duration (71.2%). Patients who received non-compliant therapy required prolonged hospital lengths of stay (6 vs. 3 days, P = 0.0001). The overall incidence of infection was similar regardless of guideline compliance (17.0% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.313).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antibiotics for open fracture frequently exceeded guideline recommendations in duration and spectrum of coverage, especially in more severe fracture types. Non-compliance with EAST recommendations was associated with increased in-hospital morbidity.

Guidelines for the prevention of infections associated with combat-related injuries: 2011 update: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Surgical Infection Society

Despite advances in resuscitation and surgical management of combat wounds, infection remains a concerning and potentially preventable complication of combat-related injuries. Interventions currently used to prevent these infections have not been either clearly defined or subjected to rigorous clinical trials. Current infection prevention measures and wound management practices are derived from retrospective review of wartime experiences, from civilian trauma data, and from in vitro and animal data. This update to the guidelines published in 2008 incorporates evidence that has become available since 2007. These guidelines focus on care provided within hours to days of injury, chiefly within the combat zone, to those combat-injured patients with open wounds or burns. New in this update are a consolidation of antimicrobial agent recommendations to a backbone of high-dose cefazolin with or without metronidazole for most postinjury indications, and recommendations for redosing of antimicrobial agents, for use of negative pressure wound therapy, and for oxygen supplementation in flight.

Prevention of infections associated with combat-related extremity injuries

During combat operations, extremities continue to be the most common sites of injury with associated high rates of infectious complications. Overall, ∼ 15% of patients with extremity injuries develop osteomyelitis, and ∼ 17% of those infections relapse or recur. The bacteria infecting these wounds have included multidrug-resistant bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella species and Escherichia coli, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The goals of extremity injury care are to prevent infection, promote fracture healing, and restore function. In this review, we use a systematic assessment of military and civilian extremity trauma data to provide evidence-based recommendations for the varying management strategies to care for combat-related extremity injuries to decrease infection rates. We emphasize postinjury antimicrobial therapy, debridement and irrigation, and surgical wound management including addressing ongoing areas of controversy and needed research. In addition, we address adjuvants that are increasingly being examined, including local antimicrobial therapy, flap closure, oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, and wound effluent characterization. This evidence-based medicine review was produced to support the Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections Associated With Combat-Related Injuries: 2011 Update contained in this supplement of Journal of Trauma.

A Comparison of Superficial and Deep Bacterial Presence in Open Fractures of the Lower Extremities

This open prospective study compared the bacterial flora of superficial and deep-wound biopsies and swabs over a 2-year period in 4 different samples cultured from open fracture wounds at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Samples were taken from 47 patients with factures graded according to Gustilo and Anderson’s classification as grade 1 (2.1%), grade II (29.8%), grade IIIA (36.2%), and grade IIIB (31%). A total of 248 samples were cultured using standard techniques. The incidence of open fracture wounds was 78.7% in male patients and 21.3% in female patients. Tibia fractures constituted 66.1%. A total of 203 bacterial isolates were cultured from 248 samples. Gram-negative bacteria constituted 53.2% of isolates, with Escherichia coli being predominant (12.8%). Staphylococcus aureus were the predominant Gram-positive cocci (15.3%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (13.3%) may be considered to be the major source of open fracture wound contamination. The bacterial species cultured from superficial and deep-wound swabs and biopsies were similar. Resistance to antimicrobials was high for penicillins (amoxicillin and cloxacillin), with values of 68.6% and 58.3%, respectively, for superficial bacterial species and 58.2% and 31.9%, respectively, for deep-wound biopsies.