The Convergence of Disclosure Concerns and Poverty Contributes to Loss to HIV Care in India: A Qualitative Study

Pathways Between Intersectional Stigma and HIV Treatment Engagement Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in India

In India and other low-and-middle-income countries, little is known about how intersectional stigma affects MSM engagement in ART. Informed by the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework, we qualitatively examined how multiple stigmas influence ART engagement among Indian MSM. We conducted 3 focus groups (N = 22) with MSM living with HIV, aged 21-58 years, in Delhi and Hyderabad to identify potential intervention targets and solutions to improve treatment outcomes. Framework analysis and techniques were used to code and analyze translated audio-recordings. Findings revealed enacted stigma, associated with HIV and MSM identity, manifested as familial shame and healthcare discrimination, inhibiting access to support, and decreasing HIV care engagement. Anticipated stigma led to worry about disclosure and societal repercussions. Community-Based-Organizations, ART centers, and family members were primary sources of support, leading to increased ART initiation and retention. Potential solutions included using MSM peer-counselors, increasing social support, and providing HIV education to the general community.

Prevalence and correlates of human immunodeficiency virus infection among spouses of married men who have sex with men in India

BACKGROUND

Men who have sex with men (MSM) in low-to-middle-income countries bear a high burden of HIV and a significant proportion marry women to satisfy socio-cultural norms. It has previously been demonstrated that HIV prevalence is higher among married versus unmarried MSM, but limited data are available on HIV prevalence among their wives.

METHODS

We recruited 149 married MSM couples where the husband disclosed his MSM behavior to his wife (disclosed MSM) and 150 married MSM who had not disclosed their MSM behavior to their wives (undisclosed MSM), in three Indian cities. All participants completed interviewer-administered surveys and underwent HIV testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess correlates of HIV among wives of MSM. Descriptive statistics were used to compare characteristics of disclosed and undisclosed MSM.

RESULTS

HIV prevalence in disclosed MSM, their wives, and undisclosed MSM was 46.9%, 27.9%, and 34.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the strongest predictor of HIV prevalence among wives of MSM was husband's HIV positive status (adjusted odds ratio: 13.4; 95% confidence interval: 5.44-33.2). Both disclosed and undisclosed MSM reported high levels of risk behavior including infrequent condom use. Most undisclosed MSM reported that they did not intend to disclose MSM behavior due to stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an extremely high HIV prevalence among women married to MSM despite low levels of individual risk behavior. Interventions are urgently needed in this vulnerable population particularly given the challenges related to disclosure of same sex behavior among their husbands.

"Men Are Scared That Others Will Know and Will Discriminate Against Them So They Would Rather Not Start Treatment." Perceptions of Heterosexual Men on HIV-Related Stigma in HIV Services in Blantyre, Malawi

BACKGROUND

Although the concept of treatment as prevention has generated optimism that an AIDS-free generation is within reach, the success of this approach centers upon early diagnosis and linkages to care for people living with HIV. Unfortunately, people continue to present for HIV care at late stages of disease and HIV-related stigma has been recognized as the major impediment to HIV prevention and treatment efforts. Given the relevance of addressing stigma to improve access and utilization of HIV services among men, this secondary analysis assessed perceptions of heterosexual men in HIV-related stigma on HIV testing and ART services in Blantyre District.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was done with maximum variation which included men with unknown statuses, newly diagnosed with HIV infection and not yet on ARVs and those with HIV infection on ART. These participants were varied according to age and area of residency and included men from urban, semi urban and rural areas. Health care workers were included depending in the participation in the provision of HIV services. Eighteen (18 IDIs) and sixteen (16) KIIs were done at private facilities and a total of twenty (20) IDS and seventeen (17) KIIs interviews were conducted at public facilities and fourteen (14) FGD were conducted at public facilities as well. The data were collected from January to July 2017 and March to September 2018.

RESULTS

Men perceived that there are barriers and enablers that influence men from accessing HIV testing and ART services. These factors include individuals, family, community and workplace. The surroundings can be a person, community and a family and it plays an integral part in ones' decision to get tested or initiate on ART. At all these levels, men would navigate the options of accessing the services while risking stigma and discrimination.

CONCLUSION

HIV-related stigma exists and impedes access to HIV testing and ART services in men. Men preferred private hospitals to public facilities because of their ability to maintain respect to privacy and confidentiality to their client's. Imitating these policies into the public hospitals can help to improve the perception of HIV-related stigma in heterosexual men.