Knee Loading After ACL-R Is Related to Quadriceps Strength and Knee Extension Differences Across the Continuum of Care

Validity of the Uninjured Limb as a Control for Preoperative Assessment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Monitoring muscle atrophy in patients undergoing anterolateral cruciate ligament reconstruction is pivotal for optimizing postoperative recovery. Conventionally, the uninjured contralateral limb serves as the control. However, its relevance in patients with prolonged physical activity hiatus due to knee instability remains uncertain. Our objectives were to compare limbs within a control group by assessing combined force measurements, cross-sectional areas (CSAs), and neuromuscular activation. In addition, we compared the contralateral limb of the surgery group preoperatively to the control group. This prospective controlled study (evidence level 2) included 40 healthy subjects (HG) and 30 patients scheduled for ACL surgery (SG). Both groups underwent identical assessments. The two HG limbs were compared to establish the standard difference for all assessed variables, whereas SG contralateral limb was compared with the mean of the control limbs. For HG, the comparisons between limbs showed no significant differences in muscle strength, CSA area, or electromyographic parameters. Similarly, comparisons between the SG contralateral limb and the mean of HG limbs revealed no significant differences in isometric and dynamic strength for the quadriceps and hamstrings (2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.6 ± 0.9 N.m/kg, and 1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 N.m/kg, respectively). Neuromuscular activation and fatigue patterns were also comparable between groups. CSAs discrepancies were attributed to differences in body mass index between groups. These findings indicate that the contralateral limb in ACL_injured patients is functionally similar to that of healthy controls, supporting its use as a valid reference for monitoring postoperative recovery. Trial Registration: NCT03200678.

Comparison of knee loading in subjects 12 weeks post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus repair when performing a double-limb squat

BACKGROUND

Despite postoperative complications, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard treatment after a tear. Recent advancements in anterior cruciate ligament repair techniques have led to improved outcomes and renewed interest in repair as a less invasive alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare knee biomechanics and quadriceps strength during double-leg squat at 12 weeks between individuals who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or repair.

METHODS

A total of 43 participants (21 repair, 23 reconstruction) were included. A 10-camera Motion Capture System was used to capture joint motions during double-leg squat, and two force plates collected ground reaction forces. Peak knee extension moment, knee flexion angle, knee flexion angle displacement, and quadriceps strength were measured. Independent t-tests were performed for participant demographics (age, height, mass), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form scores, and isokinetic quadriceps strength. A univariate ANCOVA was performed on each dependent variable and Cohen's d effect size was calculated.

FINDINGS

The repair group demonstrated significantly greater knee extension moment compared to the reconstruction group after accounting for age (P = .033, effect size = 1.00). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for quadriceps strength (P = .138), peak knee flexion angle (P = .330), or knee flexion angle displacement (P = .372).

INTERPRETATION

This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating favorable outcomes of repair compared to reconstruction. In addition to previously identified advantages of repair, there appears to be some biomechanical advantage of repair compared to reconstruction at 12 weeks.

Asymmetric loading strategies during squats following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A longitudinal investigation with curve analyses throughout and after rehabilitation

Investigations of kinetic asymmetries during bilateral squats following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are limited to mainly cross-sectional studies and discrete value data extracted at specific knee angles. We assessed loading asymmetries during squats longitudinally throughout rehabilitation using curve analysis and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between those with and without asymmetry. Bodyweight squats were performed by 24 individuals (13 females) post-ACLR on three occasions: (1) Early 2.9 (1.1) months; (2) Mid 8.8 (3.1) months; (3) at Return to Sport (RTS) 13.1 (3.6) months; and 29 asymptomatic controls (22 females) once. Time-normalized between-leg asymmetry curves of sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle moments and vertical ground reaction forces were compared using functional data analysis methods. Individual asymmetrical loading for ACLR was classified when exceeding the 95% confidence interval of controls during ≥50% of the squat. At Early, ACLR had greater asymmetry than controls for knee (15%-100% eccentric phase; 0%-100% concentric) and ankle flexion moments (56%-65% concentric). At Mid, ACLR had greater asymmetry for knee (41%-72% eccentric) and ankle flexion moments (56%-69% concentric). No between-group differences were found at RTS. From Early to RTS, ACLR reduced asymmetry for hip (21%-46% eccentric), knee (27%-58% concentric), and ankle flexion moments (21%-57% eccentric). At Early, 11/24 underloaded their ACLR knee and 1 overloaded compared with controls. At RTS, 4 underloaded and 6 overloaded. No differences in PROMs were found based on loading asymmetry. Beyond the early phase of rehabilitation from ACLR, individual-level analyses are required to reveal differing loading strategies during bilateral squats.

Improving the quality of rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, in an outpatient physiotherapy department

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a type of orthopaedic knee surgery and physiotherapy rehabilitation is undertaken for several months postoperatively, often with the aim of returning the patient to sport. Variations in postoperative protocols to guide rehabilitation exist between National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. Although there is no single guideline to guide clinicians, strong evidence does support several clinical measures to be included post-ACLR, to improve outcomes and reduce the need for revision surgery. This project aimed to align our NHS Trust's ACLR physiotherapy care with best-evidence.A literature review was completed to establish key quality standards for ACLR rehabilitation. A retrospective notes audit was then undertaken to quantify the baseline quality of care, measured against these standards. Quality improvement methods were used to improve the quality of care and postoperative rehabilitation processes for ACLR patients. A new evidence-based, postoperative rehabilitation protocol was created, a core group of clinicians was formed to see ACLR patients and a rehabilitation class, solely for ACLR patients was also implemented.The key process measure for the project was patients engaging in 'criteria-driven progressions of rehabilitation'. This 'criteria-driven progressions' rate increased from 0% at baseline to 100% during the project period. Overall, non-attendance rates maintained at a similar level from 5.4% at baseline to a final rate of 4.8%. There was also an increase in mean 'return to sport' times, from 6 to 9.9 months, which is in line with best-evidence recommendations.The previous rehabilitation provided in our trust was not aligned with current evidence. This quality improvement project has led to improvements in patient care and lessons from the project will allow other trusts to learn from the changes made, to improve their own care pathways.

Interlimb Asymmetry in Knee Extension Moment During Double-Leg Squatting Is Associated With Persistent Quadriceps Weakness After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Although double-leg squatting is less dynamic and places less demand on the quadriceps compared with landing tasks, the relationship between double-leg squatting biomechanics and persistent quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is unknown.

Purpose

To clarify the relationships between asymmetries in quadriceps strength and lower limb biomechanics during double-leg squatting >1 year after ACLR.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 26 participants (5.5 ± 3.8 years after ACLR) were enrolled. The limb symmetry index (LSI) of isokinetic quadriceps strength was used to divide participants into the high-quadriceps (HQ) group (LSI ≥90%; n = 18) and the low-quadriceps (LQ) group (LSI <90%; n = 8). The knee, hip, and ankle extension moment (relative to body weight and support moment [sum of knee, hip, and ankle moments]) and vertical ground-reaction force during double-leg squatting were analyzed using 3-dimensional motion analysis. The association of quadriceps strength and biomechanical variables was tested using 2-way analysis of variance and univariate regression analysis.

Results

A significant group-by-limb interaction was found for the peak knee extension moment and the ratios of knee and hip extension moment to support moment (P < .001, P = .015 and P < .001, respectively). The LQ group showed a significantly smaller peak knee extension moment and knee to support moment ratio but a larger hip to support moment ratio in the involved limb than in the uninvolved limb (95% CIs: knee extension moment, -0.273 to -0.088 N·m/kg; knee to support moment ratio, -10.7% to -2.2%; hip to support moment ratio, 3.2% to 8.5%). No interlimb difference was found for the HQ group. The LSI of quadriceps strength was significantly associated with the LSI of peak knee extension moment (R² = 0.183), knee to support moment ratio (R² = 0.256), and hip to support moment ratio (R² = 0.233). The mean maximum isokinetic quadriceps strength and peak knee extension moment during squatting on the involved limb of the LQ group were 2.40 ± 0.39 and 0.90 ± 0.16 N·m/kg, respectively.

Conclusion

Asymmetrical biomechanics during double-leg squatting was associated with persistent quadriceps weakness after ACLR. The LQ group had reduced knee extensor moment on the involved side during squatting despite loading at approximately half the maximum strength.

Clinical Relevance

Quadriceps strengthening exercises, together with interventions to improve neuromuscular control, may reduce asymmetrical biomechanics during double-leg squatting.

Association Between Knee Extension Strength at 3 and 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

Deficits in knee extension strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have been a major problem. The inadequate recovery of the knee extension strength of surgical limb reportedly delays return to sports and increases reinjury risk. Accordingly, the early detection of knee extension strength deficits after reconstruction may help plan early interventions to manage impairment. This study aimed to clarify the association between knee extension strength at 3 and 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring grafts were included. At 3 months postoperatively, the limb symmetry index (LSI) of isokinetic knee extension strength (IKE) at 60°/s, degree of swelling, passive range of motion of knee flexion and extension, and anterior leg reach distance were measured. At 6 months postoperatively, the LSI of IKE was measured at 60°/s, which was used as the main outcome. A correlation analysis was performed with the LSI of IKE at 6 months postoperatively as the dependent variable and the LSI of IKE at 3 months postoperatively as the independent variable. Subsequently, a multiple regression analysis was performed, with LSI of IKE at 6 months postoperatively as the dependent variable; LSI of IKE at 3 months postoperatively as the independent variable; and other variables, demographic information, and surgical data as covariates.

RESULTS

The correlation analysis revealed that the LSIs of IKE at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were correlated (r = .535, P < .001). In the multiple regression analysis, the LSI of IKE at 3 months postoperatively was significantly associated with that at 6 months postoperatively, even when other variables were included as covariates (R2 = .349, P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Asymmetry of knee extension strength at 3 months postoperatively could be more useful than other variables related to knee strength in predicting the asymmetry of knee extension strength at 6 months postoperatively.

Quadriceps muscle strength at 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with tibiofemoral joint cartilage volume

PURPOSE

Quadriceps strength deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are linked to altered lower extremity biomechanics, tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) space narrowing and cartilage composition changes. It is unknown, however, if quadriceps strength is associated with cartilage volume in the early years following ACLR prior to the onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) development. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the relationship between quadriceps muscle strength (peak and across the functional range of knee flexion) and cartilage volume at ~ 2 years following ACLR and determine the influence of concomitant meniscal pathology.

METHODS

The involved limb of 51 ACLR participants (31 isolated ACLR; 20 combined meniscal pathology) aged 18-40 years were tested at 2.4 ± 0.4 years post-surgery. Isokinetic knee extension torque generated in 10° intervals between 60° and 10° knee flexion (i.e. 60°-50°, 50°-40°, 40°-30°, 30°-20°, 20°-10°) together with peak extension torque were measured. Tibial and patellar cartilage volumes were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The relationships between peak and angle-specific knee extension torque and MRI-derived cartilage volumes were evaluated using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

In ACLR participants with and without meniscal pathology, higher knee extension torques at 60°-50° and 50°-40° knee flexion were negatively associated with medial tibial cartilage volume (p < 0.05). No significant associations were identified between peak concentric or angle-specific knee extension torques and patellar cartilage volume.

CONCLUSION

Higher quadriceps strength at knee flexion angles of 60°-40° was associated with lower cartilage volume on the medial tibia ~ 2 years following ACLR with and without concomitant meniscal injury. Regaining quadriceps strength across important functional ranges of knee flexion after ACLR may reduce the likelihood of developing early TFJ cartilage degenerative changes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Quadriceps Strength following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Normative Values based on Sex, Graft Type and Meniscal Status at 3, 6 & 9 Months

Background

Higher postoperative quadriceps function has been positively associated with surgical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the impact of autograft harvest and/or a concomitant meniscal procedure on the recovery of quadriceps strength is not well defined.

Purpose

To describe postoperative recovery of quadriceps strength following ACLR related to autograft selection, meniscal status, and sex.

Study Design

Retrospective Cohort.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-five participants who underwent ACLR with either a hamstring tendon (HT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft were included. At postoperative months 3, 6 and 9, each participant completed an isometric quadriceps strength testing protocol at 90-degrees of knee flexion. Participants' quadriceps average peak torque (Q-AvgPKT), average peak torque relative to body weight (Q-RPKT), and calculated limb symmetry index (Q-LSI) were collected and used for data analysis. Patients were placed in groups based on sex, graft type, and whether they had a concomitant meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR. At each time point, One-way ANOVAs, independent samples t-test and chi-square analyses were used to test for any between-group differences in strength outcomes.

Results

At three months after ACLR, Q-RPKT was significantly higher in those with the HT compared to the QT. At all time points, males had significantly greater Q-RPKT than females and HT Q-LSI was significantly higher than BPTB and QT. A concomitant meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR did not significantly affect Q-LSI or Q-RPKT at any testing point.

Conclusion

This study provides outcomes that are procedure specific as well as highlights the objective progression of quadriceps strength after ACLR. This information may help better-define the normal recovery of function, as well as guide rehabilitation strategies after ACLR.

Level of Evidence

3.

Individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice underloading strategies during daily activity

Underloading the surgical limb has been described in biomechanical studies across recovery time points following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). This study aimed to examine the extent to which laboratory findings translate to daily activities. Limb loading was quantified during a sit-to-stand task in laboratory testing and throughout 2 days of daily activity in 15 individuals 114.8 (17.2) days post-ACLr and 15 controls. Vertical force impulse calculated from force platform (laboratory) and pressure insoles (daily) was used to quantify limb loading. Between-limb symmetry was calculated for limb loading and knee strength measures, 2 × 2 GLM repeated measures determined a significant group-by-limb interaction on daily limb loading. Surgical limb daily loading was lower compared to nonsurgical (p < .001; effect sizes [ES] = 0.63), and control matched limbs (surgical: p = .037, ES = 0.80 and nonsurgical: p = .02, ES = 0.89). No group differences were found in total daily loading (summed loading between limbs; p = .18; ES = 0.50) and time performing weight-bearing activities (p = .32; ES = 0.36). Pearson's correlation determined that between-limb symmetry in daily loading was related to sit-to-stand loading (r = .62; p = .01) and knee extensor strength symmetry (r = .6; p = .02) in the ACLr group. These data support the presence of underloading behaviors in individuals 10-14 weeks following ACLr that are consistent with previous biomechanical studies and current biomechanical data. Knee extensor weakness was related to greater underloading. Asymmetrical loading quantified in the laboratory is practiced throughout the day in individuals post-ACLr. Practice afforded by daily activities represents powerful contributors to learning of a pattern that contrasts the goal of rehabilitation exercises.

Adolescent Athletes Demonstrate Inferior Objective Profiles at the Time of Return to Sport After ACLR Compared With Healthy Controls

Background:

Athletes display persistent muscle deficits and altered limb-loading mechanics at the time of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose:

To compare an objective profile of adolescent athletes at RTS after ACLR to matched healthy controls.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included were 124 participants; 62 patients who underwent ACLR (15.4 ± 1.7 years) and 62 healthy controls (15.3 ± 1.7 years). Motion capture and force plates were used to capture joint motions during jump landing (JL) and single-limb squat (SLS) tasks. Energy absorption contribution (EAC) was calculated, and repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess for EAC differences between groups. Participants completed an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, and isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength testing was performed on each limb. Independent t tests were run to examine age, height, weight, and IKDC scores as well as compare differences between groups for quadriceps and hamstring strength.

Results:

A significant group × joint interaction was found for JL (P < .001) and SLS (P < .001). For JL, patients who underwent ACLR utilized significantly greater hip (P < .001) and significantly less knee (P < .001) EAC on the surgical limb compared with controls. During SLS, patients who underwent ACLR utilized significantly greater hip (P < .001) and significantly less knee (P < .001) EAC on the surgical limb compared with controls. The ACLR cohort demonstrated lower IKDC scores (P < .001) and significantly lower quadriceps strength on the surgical limb (P < .001) than controls. There were no differences in surgical limb hamstring strength between the ACLR cohort and healthy controls (P = .701).

Conclusion:

Compared with matched healthy controls, the participants who underwent ACLR in this study demonstrated an inferior objective profile at RTS, consisting of deficits in surgical limb loading, self-reported outcomes, and strength.

Energy Absorption Contribution Deficits in Participants Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Context: Lower-extremity loading patterns change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, there is limited research regarding energy absorption contribution (EAC) of athletes following ACLR who reinjure their ACL and those who do not. EAC can be utilized as a measure of joint loading during tasks. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Three groups of individuals (13 in each group) with matched age, sex, height, weight, and sports were enrolled. Data were collected at time of return-to-sport testing for the 2 ACLR groups. An 8-camera 3D motion capture system with a sampling rate of 120 Hz and 2 force plates capturing at 1200 Hz were used to capture joint motions in all 3 planes during a double-limb jump landing. Results: Participants in the ACLR no reinjury and ACLR reinjury groups had significantly greater hip EAC (55.8 [21.5] and 56.7 [21.2]) compared with healthy controls (19.5 [11.1]), P < .001 and P < .001, respectively. The ACLR no reinjury and ACLR reinjury groups had significantly lower knee EAC (24.6 [22.7] and 27.4 [20.8]) compared with healthy controls (57.0 [12.2]), P < .001 and P < .001, respectively. However, the ACLR reinjury group had significantly lower ankle EAC (15.9 [4.6]) than healthy controls (23.5 [6.6]), whereas there was no statistical difference between the ACLR no reinjury group (19.7 [7.8]) and healthy controls. Conclusions: Athletes who had a second ACL injury after ACLR, and those without second ACL injury, appear to have similar hip, knee, and ankle joint loading of the surgical limb at return-to-sport testing. Nevertheless, joint loading patterns were significantly different from healthy controls. The study suggests that EAC as a measure of joint loading during a double-limb jump landing at time of return to sport may not be a strong predictor for second injury following ACLR.

The effectiveness of preoperative exercise programmes on quadriceps strength prior to and following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative exercise programmes on quadriceps strength prior to and following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

a systematic review was undertaken, included studies were evaluated using the Modified Downs and Black checklist which is appropriate for determining the quality of randomised and non-randomised studies. Scientific databases searched included PubMED, EBSCO Health, CINAHL, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 2021.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. There were six randomised studies and four prospective studies. The level of evidence is categorised as 'limited' due to heterogenicity and only six studies reported quadriceps strength increases. Five studies demonstrated preoperative exercise of 4-16 weeks duration can significantly increase preoperative quadriceps strength. One study demonstrated preoperative OKC exercise produced significantly stronger preoperative quadriceps compared to CKC exercise. One study showed no between group (intervention vs control) quadriceps strength difference pre or 12 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

4-16 weeks of preoperative exercise could increase quadriceps strength preoperatively but any persistent postoperative strength benefit from undertaking a standardised preoperative intervention is unclear. There is considerable variation and methodological limitations across the included studies and the composition of optimal preoperative ACLR exercise is currently unknown.

Twelve-Week Quadriceps Strength as A Predictor of Quadriceps Strength At Time Of Return To Sport Testing Following Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Restoration of quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) continues to challenge both patients and clinicians. Failure to adequately restore quadriceps strength has been linked to decreased patients' self-reported outcomes and an increased risk for re-injury. Early identification of quadriceps strength deficits may assist in tailoring early interventions to better address impairments.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between early (12 weeks following ACL-R) isokinetic peak torque and isokinetic peak torque at time of return to sport (RTS) testing.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort Study.

METHODS

A total of 120 participants (males = 55; females =65) were enrolled in the study (age = 16.1±1.4 yrs; height = 1.72±10.5 m; mass = 70.7±16.3 kg). All participants were level 1 or 2 cutting and pivoting sport athletes who underwent a primary bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACL-R. Participants were tested at two time points: 12 weeks following surgery and again at time of RTS testing. A linear regression model was carried out to investigate the relationship between age, sex, and isokinetic peak torque at 12 weeks following ACL-R and isokinetic peak torque at time of RTS testing.

RESULTS

When 12-week isokinetic peak torque was entered first for the hierarchy regression analysis, this factor was predictive of the peak torque at the time of RTS testing, F(1, 118) = 105.6, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.472, indicating that the 12-week quadriceps strength accounted for 47% of the variance in the quadriceps strength at the time of RTS testing. When age and sex were added in the regression analysis, both factors only added 0.8% of variance for the quadriceps strength at the time of RTS testing.

CONCLUSION

Isokinetic peak torque at 12 weeks following surgery was shown to be a significantly strong predictor (47%) for isokinetic quadriceps strength recovery at time of RTS. This finding underscores the importance of early restoration of quadriceps strength and that while non-modifiable factors such as sex and age are important, early restoration of quadriceps strength most strongly influences late stage quadriceps strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Limb dominance influences energy absorption contribution (EAC) during landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of limb dominance on energy absorption contribution (EAC) during a jump landing (JL) task at return to sport (RTS) after ACL-R.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Clinical Research Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eight participants (age = 16.19 ± 1.74, Height = 172.25 ± 9.96 cm, Weight = 72.61 ± 15.48 kg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants were grouped into two groups: those who injured their dominant limb ACL (D-ACL) and those who injured their non-dominant limb ACL (ND-ACL). A multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess for between group differences in EAC across the three joints.

RESULTS

In the surgical limb, D-ACL demonstrated smaller hip (D-ACL = 32.23 ± 10.44%, ND-ACL = 69.68 ± 8.51%, p < 0.008) and greater knee (D-ACL = 45.86 ± 10.36%, ND-ACL = 9.41 ± 5.68%, p < 0.008) EAC than ND-ACL. In the non-surgical limb, D-ACL demonstrated greater hip (D-ACL = 62.59 ± 9.03%, ND-ACL = 25.95 ± 7.15%, p < 0.008), and smaller knee (D-ACL = 13.79 ± 5.57%, ND-ACL = 58.01 ± 7.86%, p < 0.008), EAC than ND-ACL.

CONCLUSION

After ACL-R, eccentric loading strategies during a JL task at RTS are different depending upon limb dominance. D-ACL demonstrated a greater knee loading strategy on the surgical side compared to ND-ACL.

Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on patellofemoral joint stress and lower extremity biomechanics at 12 weeks post-surgery and at time of return to sport in adolescent females

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine kinematic and kinetic differences associated with patellofemoral pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between limbs at 12-week post-surgery and at time of return to sport.

METHOD

Twenty-four adolescent females completed 5 consecutive single leg squats on each limb at 12-weeks post-surgery and again during their RTS assessment. Peak knee extension moment, peak hip adduction angle, and patellofemoral joint stress at 45 degrees of knee flexion were calculated. Separate two by two repeated measures ANOVA were performed.

FINDINGS

There was a significant interaction (limb × time) for knee extension moment (p < 0.001). Surgical limb knee extension moment was significantly less than the non-surgical limb at return to sport (p < 0.001). At 12-weeks the surgical limb was significantly less than non-surgical limb (p < 0.001), additionally the surgical limb was significantly greater at time of return to sport than at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). There was a significant main effect of limb for hip adduction angle (p = 0.002). Surgical limb was significantly greater than non-surgical limb (Surgical = 9.84 (SE 1.53) degree, non-surgical = 4.79 (SE 1.01) degree). There was also a main effect of time and limb for patellofemoral joint stress. Return to sport was significantly greater than 12 weeks and the surgical limb was significantly less than non-surgical limb (Surgical = 4.93 (SE 0325) MPa, Nonsurgical = 5.29 (SE 0.30) MPa).

INTERPRETATION

The surgical limb of participants following ACL-R demonstrated variables that have been associated with the development of patellofemoral pain.

Patient function in serial assessments throughout the post-ACL reconstruction progression

OBJECTIVE

To assess the changes in patient strength and function from 4- to 6-month assessments following ACLR, determine relationships between changes in strength to changes in subjective function, and identify factors that predict patients that fail to increase in strength.

DESIGN

Prospective, Cohort Study.

SETTING

Controlled Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven patients(27 female, 24.3 ± 11.1 years) completed a battery of performance assessments at approximately 4- and 6-months following primary ACLR (4.03 ±0 .49 and 6.46 ±0 .68 months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Subjective scores and isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength were compared across visits. Patients were categorized per their ability to increase in strength beyond a previously defined threshold(0.22 Nm/kg). Binary logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of patients that failed to meet strength changes.

RESULTS

Patients demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcomes and strength measures between visits(P's < 0.05). Higher age (B = -0.073, P = .039), lower pre-injury activity levels (B = 0.61, P = .022), and higher limb symmetry indexes (B = -0.044, P = .05) at 4-months were predictors of patients that did not achieve improvements in quadriceps strength between assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

From 4- to 6-months post-ACLR, increases in subjective function, strength and symmetry were observed. High quadriceps symmetry at interim assessments without consideration of the magnitude of strength values could overestimate recovery of quadriceps function.