Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion

Intracochlear Trauma and Local Ossification Patterns Differ Between Straight and Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes

HYPOTHESIS

Trauma to the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) or spiral ligament (SL) during cochlear implant (CI) insertion segregates with electrode type and induces localized intracochlear ossification and fibrosis.

BACKGROUND

The goal of atraumatic CI insertion is to preserve intracochlear structures, limit reactive intracochlear tissue formation, and preserve residual hearing. Previous qualitative studies hypothesized a localized effect of trauma on intracochlear tissue formation; however, quantitative studies failed to confirm this.

METHODS

Insertional trauma beyond the immediate insertion site was histologically assessed in 21 human temporal bones with a CI. Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated and virtually resectioned perpendicular to the cochlear spiral at high resolution. The cochlear volume occupied by ossification or fibrosis was determined at the midpoint of the trauma and compared with regions proximal and distal to this point.

RESULTS

Seven cases, all implanted with precurved electrodes, showed an OSL fracture beyond the immediate insertion site. Significantly more intracochlear ossification was observed at the midpoint of the OSL fracture, compared with the -26 to -18 degrees proximal and 28 to 56 degrees distal to the center. No such pattern was observed for fibrosis. In the 12 cases with a perforation of the SL (9 straight and 3 precurved electrodes), no localized pattern of ossification or fibrosis was observed around these perforations.

CONCLUSION

OSL fractures were observed exclusively with precurved electrodes in this study and may serve as a nidus for localized intracochlear ossification. Perforation of the SL, in contrast, predominantly occurred with straight electrodes and was not associated with localized ossification.

Human Histology after Structure Preservation Cochlear Implantation via Round Window Insertion

OBJECTIVES

Current surgical techniques aim to preserve intracochlear structures during cochlear implant (CI) insertion to maintain residual cochlear function. The optimal technique to minimize damage, however, is still under debate. The aim of this study is to histologically compare insertional trauma and intracochlear tissue formation in humans with a CI implanted via different insertion techniques.

METHODS

One recent temporal bone from a donor who underwent implantation of a full-length CI (576°) via round window (RW) insertion was compared with nine cases implanted via cochleostomy (CO) or extended round window (ERW) approach. Insertional trauma was assessed on H&E-stained histological sections. 3D reconstructions were generated and virtually re-sectioned to measure intracochlear volumes of fibrosis and neo-ossification.

RESULTS

The RW insertion case showed electrode translocation via the spiral ligament. 2/9 CO/ERW cases showed no insertional trauma. The total volume of the cochlea occupied by fibro-osseous tissue was 10.8% in the RW case compared with a mean of 30.6% (range 8.7%-44.8%, N = 9) in the CO/ERW cases. The difference in tissue formation in the basal 5 mm of scala tympani, however, was even more pronounced when the RW case (12.3%) was compared with the cases with a CO/ERW approach (mean of 93.8%, range 81% to 100%, N = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Full-length CI insertions via the RW can be minimally traumatic at the cochlear base without inducing extensive fibro-osseous tissue formation locally. The current study further supports the hypothesis that drilling of the cochleostomy with damage to the endosteum incites a local tissue reaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4: Case-control study Laryngoscope, 134:945-953, 2024.

A Multicenter Comparison of 1-yr Functional Outcomes and Programming Differences Between the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in hearing outcomes or stimulation levels between Advanced Bionics straight and precurved arrays.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review across three implant centers.

SETTING

Tertiary centers for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifteen pediatric and 205 adult cochlear implants (CIs) were reviewed. All patients were implanted under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2009 guidelines with a HiRes Ultra SlimJ or Mid-Scala electrode array.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation after implantation, as well as CI-only listening scores for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences were compared 1 year after implantation. Stimulation levels for threshold and comfort levels were also compared 1 year after implantation.

RESULTS

Hearing preservation was significantly better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala electrode array. Bamford-Kowal-Bench outcomes were not significantly different between the two arrays in any listening condition. Stimulation levels were not different between arrays but did vary across electrode contacts. At least one electrode was deactivated in 33% of implants but was more common for the SlimJ device.

CONCLUSION

Modern straight and precurved arrays from Advanced Bionics did not differ in hearing performance or current requirements. Although hearing preservation was possible with both devices, the SlimJ array would still be the preferred electrode in cases where hearing preservation was a priority. Unfortunately, the SlimJ device was also prone to poor sound perception on basal electrodes. Further investigation is needed to determine if deactivated electrodes are associated with electrode position/migration, and if programming changes are needed to optimize the use of these high-frequency channels.

Residual hearing preservation for cochlear implantation surgery

Cochlear implantation (CI) has developed for more than four decades. Initially, CI was used for profound bilateral hearing impairment. However, the indications for CI have expanded in recent years to include children with symptomatic partial deafness. Therefore, CI strategies to preserve residual hearing are important for both patients and otologists. The loss of residual low-frequency hearing is thought to be the result of many factors. All surgical methods have the same goal: protect the delicate intracochlear structures and preserve residual low-frequency hearing to improve speech perception abilities. Fully opening the round window membrane, a straight electrode array, slower insertion speed, and the use of corticosteroids result in a higher rate of hearing preservation. Several factors, like the way of surgical approaches, length of arrays and timing of activation, may not affect the residual hearing preservation. Therefore, the classic atraumatic technique, including the very slow and delicate insertion and administration of intraoperative corticosteroids, can improve hearing outcomes.

Predictors of Fibrotic and Bone Tissue Formation With 3-D Reconstructions of Post-implantation Human Temporal Bones

HYPOTHESIS

Years of implantation, surgical insertion approach, and electrode length will impact the volume of new tissue formation secondary to cochlear implantation.

BACKGROUND

New tissue formation, fibrosis, and osteoneogenesis after cochlear implantation have been implicated in increasing impedance and affecting performance of the cochlear implant.

METHODS

3-D reconstructions of 15 archival human temporal bones from patients with a history of cochlear implantation (CI) were generated from H&E histopathologic slides to study factors which affect volume of tissue formation.

RESULTS

Years of implantation was a predictor of osteoneogenesis (r = 0.638, p-value = 0.011) and total new tissue formation (r = 0.588, p-value = 0.021), however not of fibrosis (r = 0.235, p-value = 0.399). Median total tissue formation differed between cochleostomy and round window insertions, 25.98 and 10.34%, respectively (Mann-Whitney U = 7, p = 0.018). No correlations were found between electrode length or angular insertion depth and total new tissue (p = 0.192, p = 0.35), osteoneogenesis (p = 0.193, p = 0.27), and fibrosis (p = 0.498, p = 0.83), respectively. However, the type II error for electrode length and angular insertion depth ranged from 0.73 to 0.90, largely due to small numbers of the shorter electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

With numbers of cochlear implant recipients increasing worldwide, an understanding of how to minimize intracochlear changes from implantation is important. The present study demonstrates that increasing years of implantation and inserting electrodes via a cochleostomy compared with a round window approach are associated with significantly greater degree of new tissue volume formation. While previous studies have demonstrated increased intracochlear damage in the setting of translocation with longer electrodes, length, and angular insertion depth of CI electrodes were not associated with increased tissue formation.

Identification of anatomic risk factors for scalar translocation in cochlear implant patients

AIM

Microanatomical evaluation of cochlear implant (CI) patients to identify anatomical risk factors for a scalar translocation.

METHODS

CI patients with both a regular scala tympani spiralization (group A) and a scalar translocation (group B) were identified via postoperative flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Then, the corresponding preoperative multislice computed tomography (MS-CT) and postoperative FD-CT datasets were assessed: First, the cochleae were separated in 6 segments of 45° each. Next, quantitative (cochlea height, length, depth, cochlear duct diameter [CD] per segment; percentual tapering of the CD per segment named cochlear geometry index [CGI]) and qualitative (identifiability of the CI model; CI-integrity; intracochlear array position) parameters were evaluated and compared for both groups. Receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed for the CGI.

RESULTS

In total, 40 preoperative MS-CT and postoperative FD-CT datasets (n_A=20; n_B=20) were analysed. Model "CI 512" was successfully identified and CI-integrity has been confirmed in all cases. Quantitative analysis showed a significant difference of both the CD at 0° (CD_A0°= 2.06± 0.23mm; CD_B0°= 2.19±0.18mm; p_0°= 0.04) and the CGI of the first segment (CGI_A0°-45°= 18.87±6.04%; CGI_B0°-45°= 28.89±8.58%; p_0°-45°= 0.0001). For all other 5 cochlear segments there was no significant difference of CD and CGI; there was no significant difference of external cochlea diameters. The area under the curve (AUC) of the CGI_0-45° was 0.864 with 24.50° as the optimal cut-off value to discriminate patients with a scala tympani spiralization and a scalar translocation. CGI_0-45° of> 24.50° allowed the correct identification of 85% of patients with a scalar translocation.

CONCLUSION

CI insertion trauma is associated with a significantly higher narrowing of the proximal basal cochlea turn (BCT). The CGI as percentual tapering of the BCT turned out as reliable, clinically applicable parameter for identification of patients with an increased risk for a scalar translocation.

First Experience With a New Thin Lateral Wall Electrode in Human Temporal Bones

INTRODUCTION

A modern cochlear implant electrode array design must combine: improved surgical ease of use, structure preservation, particularly important for pediatric application, stable position within the cochlea over time, and a meaningful balance between hearing preservation against addressing sufficient cochlear tissue to support electrical-only hearing. The aim of this study was to investigate a new lateral wall electrode array design from Advanced Bionics on human temporal bones (TBs).

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen TBs were implanted with the SlimJ electrode array via the round window. The electrode array is 23 mm long, with a cross-section varying from 0.25 × 0.55 mm at the most apical contact to 0.6 × 0.8 mm at the proximal marker contact. To assess location of the electrode array, the TBs were postoperatively scanned using cone beam computed tomography, and histology was performed to assess intracochlear trauma (Grades 0-4).

RESULTS

All electrode arrays were considered easy to insert. The average insertion depth was 432 degrees measured from the round window with a range from 411 to 450 degrees azimuth. Nine out of 10 electrode arrays were inserted fully (<0.5 mm out of the cochlea), one electrode array was left 1.5 mm out of the cochlea. No translocations were observed in all 10 cochleae, slight touching of the basilar membrane at the distal portion of the array was observed in 50% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The results from the new thin lateral wall electrode array from Advanced Bionics provided consistent scala tympani locations. No translocations were observed and almost all electrode arrays were fully inserted. These results are promising and the new electrode array will be further studied in clinical practice investigating hearing preservation capabilities and speech performance.

Comparison of a Mid Scala and a Perimodiolar Electrode in Adults: Performance, Impedances, and Psychophysics

OBJECTIVES

The HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode array (HFms) is designed to sit within the scala tympani without touching either the lateral wall or the modiolus. The aim of this study was to compare the HFms to the Helix perimodiolar electrode array.

METHOD

Two groups of recipients with Helix (n = 22 ears) and HFms (n = 29 ears) electrode arrays were retrospectively identified and matched by age at implantation and duration of severe to profound deafness. Most comfortable listening levels (M), impedances, Freiburger Monosyllables in quiet, and Oldenburg sentences in adaptive noise were compared at 3, 6, and 12 months postimplant.

RESULTS

Median scores for monosyllables in quiet for the HFms group were significantly better than the Helix group at each test interval (p < 0.05). Speech perception in quiet also significantly improved from 3 to 12 months for both groups (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups for speech in noise. Impedances were significantly lower for the HFms group at 12 months (p < 0.05) except at the basal end and M levels were generally higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The HFms group had better median performance for monosyllables in quiet than the Helix group at each test interval, although performance in noise was similar. For speech in noise, the HFms group appear to reach optimum performance quicker than the Helix group. Impedances were lower in the HFms group across the array, other than at the most basal end, and support our hypothesis that the HFms assumes a more lateral position within the cochlea than the Helix electrode, although our article did not include imaging data.

Potential insertion complications with cochlear implant electrodes

Objectives: The aim of this discussion paper and literature review was to estimate the incidence of a variety of complications associated with the surgical placement of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and to discuss the implications and management of sub-optimal electrode placement. Results: A review of the peer-reviewed literature suggests that the incidence of incomplete electrode insertion and kinking is more prevalent in straight arrays and not more than about 2% in CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy/patency. Incidence of tip fold-over is greater with perimodiolar arrays but also occurs with straight arrays and is typically less than 5%. Conversely, electrode migration is more common with straight arrays, and high rates (up to 46%) have been reported in some studies. Scalar translocations have also been reported for both perimodiolar and straight arrays. Higher rates have been reported for stylet-based perimodiolar electrodes inserted via cochleostomy (up to 56%), but with much lower rates (<10%) with both sheath-based perimodiolar arrays and lateral wall arrays. Electrode positioning complications represent a significant proportion of perioperative CI complications and compromise the level of benefit from the device. Careful surgical planning and appropriate pre- and intraoperative imaging can reduce the likelihood and impact of electrode positioning complications. There is also evidence that newer array designs are less prone to certain complications, particularly scalar translocation. Conclusions: It is important that implanting surgeons are aware of the impact of sub-optimal electrode placement and the steps that can be taken to avoid, identify and manage such complications.

Nanomechanical mapping reveals localized stiffening of the basilar membrane after cochlear implantation

Cochlear implantation leads to many structural changes within the cochlea which can impair residual hearing. In patients with preserved low-frequency hearing, a delayed hearing loss can occur weeks-to-years post-implantation. We explore whether stiffening of the basilar membrane (BM) may be a contributory factor in an animal model. Our objective is to map changes in morphology and Young's modulus of basal and apical areas of the BM after cochlear implantation, using quantitative nanomechanical atomic force microscopy (QNM-AFM) after cochlear implant surgery. Cochlear implantation was undertaken in the guinea pig, and the BM was harvested at four time-points: 1 day, 14 days, 28 days and 84 days post-implantation for QNM-AFM analysis. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were determined prior to implantation and termination. BM tissue showed altered morphology and a progressive increase in Young's modulus, mainly in the apex, over time after implantation. BM tissue from the cochlear base demonstrated areas of extreme stiffness which are likely due to micro-calcification on the BM. In conclusion, stiffening of the BM after cochlear implantation occurs over time, even at sites far apical to a cochlear implant.

Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials

OBJECTIVE

To report current knowledge on the topic of intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response following cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles. Search components included "cochlear implant," "Foreign body response (FBR)," and "fibrosis." Original studies and review articles relevant to the topic were included.

RESULTS

Ninety peer-reviewed articles describing the foreign body response or intracochlear fibrosis following CI were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracochlear fibrosis following CI represents a significant limiting factor for the success of CI users. Several strategies have been employed to mitigate the foreign body response within the cochlea including drug delivery systems and modifications in surgical technique and electrode design. A better understanding of the FBR has the potential to improve CI outcomes and the next generation of cochlear prostheses.

The Insertion Results of a Mid-scala Electrode Assessed by MRI and CBCT Image Fusion

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the results of clinical surgical insertions with a Mid-scala array (HIFocus Mid-Scala Electrode, HFms).

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive retrospective case study.

SETTINGS

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Analyses of imaging data of 26 consecutive patients (31 insertions) implanted with the HFms.

INTERVENTION (S)

The evaluation of insertion trauma evoked by a previously validated image fusion technique. Electrode reconstructions from postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were overlaid onto preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to create artifact-free images.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The electrode position was quantified in relation to the basilar membrane. Trauma scaling adopted from Eshraghi was used for evaluating insertion trauma. The results of the visual assessment of the postoperative CBCT were compared to those obtained with the fusion technique.

RESULTS

Three insertions had to be excluded due to incompatibility of the imaging data with the fusion software. We found consistent peri- to mid-modiolar placement of the HFms with a mean insertion depth angle of 376°. According to the medical records, a visual examination of the postoperative CBCT indicated that there had been no scala dislocations but when assessed by the image fusion technique, five scala dislocations (17.8%) were found. Additionally, one tip fold-over was detected in the postoperative CBCT even though this was not evident in any intraoperative measurements.

CONCLUSION

HFms showed atraumatic surgical insertion results with consistent mid-modiolar placement. Image fusion enhances the accuracy of the insertion trauma assessment. Routine postoperative imaging is recommended for identifying tip fold-over as well as for quality control and documentation.

Cochlear Implantation With a Novel Long Straight Electrode: the Insertion Results Evaluated by Imaging and Histology in Human Temporal Bones

HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the insertion results of a novel straight array (EVO) by detailed imaging and subsequent histology in human temporal bones (TB).

BACKGROUND

The main focuses of modern cochlear implant surgery are to prevent damage to the intracochlear structures and to preserve residual hearing. This is often achievable with new atraumatic electrode arrays in combination with meticulous surgical techniques.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen TBs were implanted with the EVO. Pre- and postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans were reconstructed and fused for an artifact-free representation of the electrode. The array's vertical position was quantified in relation to the basilar membrane on basis of which trauma was classified (Grades 0-4). The basilar membrane location was modeled from previous histologic data. The TBs underwent subsequent histologic examination.

RESULTS

The EVOs were successfully inserted in all TBs. Atraumatic insertion (Grades 0-1) were accomplished in 14 of 20 TBs (70%). There were three apical translocations, and two basal translocations due to electrode bulging. One TB had multiple translocations. The sensitivity and specificity of imaging for detecting insertion trauma (Grades 2-4) was 87.5% and 97.3.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Comparable insertion results as reported for other arrays were also found for the EVO. Insertion trauma can be mostly avoided with meticulous insertion techniques to prevent bulging and by limiting the insertion depth angle to 360 degrees. The image fusion technique is a reliable tool for evaluating electrode placement and is feasible for trauma grading.

Atraumatic Scala Tympani Cochleostomy; Resolution of the Dilemma

OBJECTIVES

While an accurate placement in cochleostomy is critical to ensure appropriate insertion of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode into the scala tympani (ST), the choice of preferred cochleostomy sites widely varied among experienced surgeons. We present a novel technique for precise yet readily applicable localization of the optimum site for performing ST cochleostomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty fresh frozen temporal bones were dissected using the mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy approach. Based on the facial nerve and the margins of the round window membrane (RWM), the cochleostomy site was chosen to insert the electrode into the ST while preserving the surrounding intracochlear structures.

RESULTS

There is a limited safe area suitable for the ST implantation in the area inferior and anterior to the RWM. There is a higher risk of scala vestibuli (SV) insertion anterior to that area. Posterior to that area, the cochlear aqueduct (CA) and inferior cochlear vein (ICV) are liable for the injury.

CONCLUSION

For atraumatic CI, precise and easy localization of the site of cochleostomy play a pivotal role in preserving intracochlear structures. Accurate setting of the vertical and horizontal orientations is mandatory before choosing the site of cochleostomy. The facial nerve and the margins of the RWM offer a very helpful clue for such localization; meanwhile, it is readily identifiable in the surgical field.

Challenging aspects of contemporary cochlear implant electrode array design

Objective

A design comparison of current perimodiolar and lateral wall electrode arrays of the cochlear implant (CI) is provided. The focus is on functional features such as acoustic frequency coverage and tonotopic mapping, battery consumption and dynamic range. A traumacity of their insertion is also evaluated.

Methods

Review of up-to-date literature.

Results

Perimodiolar electrode arrays are positioned in the basal turn of the cochlea near the modiolus. They are designed to initiate the action potential in the proximity to the neural soma located in spiral ganglion. On the other hand, lateral wall electrode arrays can be inserted deeper inside the cochlea, as they are located along the lateral wall and such insertion trajectory is less traumatic. This class of arrays targets primarily surviving neural peripheral processes. Due to their larger insertion depth, lateral wall arrays can deliver lower acoustic frequencies in manner better corresponding to cochlear tonotopicity. In fact, spiral ganglion sections containing auditory nerve fibres tuned to low acoustic frequencies are located deeper than 1 and half turn inside the cochlea. For this reason, a significant frequency mismatch might be occurring for apical electrodes in perimodiolar arrays, detrimental to speech perception. Tonal languages such as Mandarin might be therefore better treated with lateral wall arrays. On the other hand, closer proximity to target tissue results in lower psychophysical threshold levels for perimodiolar arrays. However, the maximal comfort level is also lower, paradoxically resulting in narrower dynamic range than that of lateral wall arrays. Battery consumption is comparable for both types of arrays.

Conclusions

Lateral wall arrays are less likely to cause trauma to cochlear structures. As the current trend in cochlear implantation is the maximal protection of residual acoustic hearing, the lateral wall arrays seem more suitable for hearing preservation CI surgeries. Future development could focus on combining the advantages of both types: perimodiolar location in the basal turn extended to lateral wall location for higher turn locations.

A New Slim Modiolar Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation: A Radiological and Histological Study

HYPOTHESIS

To explore the results of a new slim modiolar electrode array (SMA) with respect to intracochlear placement and trauma evaluated by detailed radiologic imaging and histology.

BACKGROUND

Hearing and structure preservation is the goal of cochlear implantation for advanced hearing outcomes. Currently, this is most consistently achieved with thin lateral wall electrodes. Modiolar electrodes are located nearer the modiolus and may provide some electrophysiological advantages, but have a greater tendency for causing insertion trauma.

METHODS

The SMA was implanted in 20 fresh-frozen human temporal bones (TB). All TBs were scanned pre- and postoperatively with cone beam computed tomography. For atraumatic insertion, the round window approach was preferred. Scalar localization and trauma were analyzed by three-dimensional image fusion reconstructions of the pre- and postimplant scans. The TBs underwent histologic examination to validate the radiologic findings.

RESULTS

Insertion through the round window was performed in 19 TBs and through a cochleostomy in one TB. In one TB trauma in the form of scala translocation was identified radiologically and histologically. In the remaining TBs there was no insertion trauma. Adequate modiolar localization of the SMA was found in 19 of 20 TBs. The mean angular insertion depth was 400 degrees without correlation to cochlea size. There was no significant statistical difference between the radiological and histological measurements of electrode localization.

CONCLUSION

The SMA showed consistent and atraumatic insertion results in TBs. Pre- and postimplant cone beam computed tomography with image fusion was shown to be very accurate for the assessment of electrode position and insertion trauma.

Use of a mid-scala and a lateral wall electrode in children: insertion depth and hearing preservation

CONCLUSIONS

Atraumatic insertion of the HiFocus^TM Mid-Scala (HFMS) electrode via the round window was successfully achieved in seven children. Residual hearing 6 months post-operatively was preserved to within 10 dB HL of the pre-operative audiogram at 500 Hz for six children, indicating minimal initial insertion trauma to the cochlea.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to document the clinical experience and evaluate differences between HFMS and HiFocus^TM 1j (HF1j) by means of insertion depth and hearing preservation results.

METHOD

Nineteen children were prospectively recruited and consecutively implanted with the HF1j electrode (n = 12) or the HFMS electrode (n = 7) via the round window. Average median angular insertion depths and the amount of residual hearing preserved at 6 months post-operatively were compared between the two electrode groups.

RESULTS

The median angular insertion depth for the HF1j was 439° and for the HFMS 435°. Preservation of residual hearing at 500 Hz was assessed in seven HFMS subjects and 11 HF1j subjects. Based on the Skarzynski formula, three out of seven subjects (42%) in the HFMS group had their residual hearing completely preserved at 500 Hz. In the control group, no subjects had complete hearing preservation and five subjects had a complete loss of residual hearing.

The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation

Objectives

As indications for cochlear implantation have expanded to include patients with more residual hearing, increasing emphasis has been placed on minimally traumatic electrode insertion. Histopathologic evaluation remains the gold standard for evaluation of cochlear trauma, but advances in imaging techniques have allowed clinicians to determine scalar electrode location in vivo. This review will examine the relationship between scalar location of electrode arrays and audiologic outcomes. In addition, the impact that surgical approach, electrode design, and insertion depth have on scalar location will be evaluated.

Data Sources: PubMed literature review

Review Methods: A review of the current literature was conducted to analyze the relationship between scalar location of cochlear implant electrode arrays and speech perception outcomes. Further, data were reviewed to determine the impact that surgical variables have on scalar electrode location.

Results

Electrode insertions into the scala tympani are associated with superior speech perception and higher rates of hearing preservation. Lateral wall electrodes, and round window/extended round window approaches appear to maximize the likelihood of a scala tympani insertion. It does not appear that deeper insertions are associated with higher rates of scalar translocation.

Conclusion

Superior audiologic outcomes are observed for electrode arrays inserted entirely within the scala tympani. The majority of clinical data demonstrate that lateral wall design and a round window approach increase the likelihood of a scala tympani insertion.

Level of Evidence

N/A.

Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child

OBJECTIVE

To compare stimulation parameters of peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar electrode arrays using two surgical approaches.

METHODS

Impedance, stimulation thresholds, comfortably loud current levels, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds were compared between 2 arrays implanted in the same child at 5 time points: surgery, activation/day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3. The peri-modiolar array was implanted via cochleostomy in all children (n = 64), while the anti-modiolar array was inserted via a cochleostomy in 43 children and via the round window in 21 children.

RESULTS

The anti-modiolar array had significantly lower impedance, but required higher current levels to elicit thresholds, comfort, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds than the peri-modiolar array across all time points, particularly in basal electrodes (p < 0.05). The prevalence of open electrodes was similar in anti-modiolar (n = 5) and peri-modiolar (n = 3) arrays.

CONCLUSION

Significant but clinically acceptable differences in stimulation parameters between peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar arrays persisted four months after surgery in children using bilateral cochlear implants. The surgical approach used to insert the anti-modiolar array had no overall effect on outcomes.

Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that bipolar electrical impedance measurements in perimodiolar cochlear implants (CIs) may be used to differentiate between perimodiolar insertion technique favoring proximity to the modiolus or lateral wall.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Bipolar impedances are a measure of electrical resistance between pairs of electrode contacts in a CI. Stimulation is through biphasic pulses at fixed frequency. Impedance measurements were made in real time through sequential sampling of electrode pairs. Perimodiolar electrodes were inserted in temporal bones using one of two techniques: 1) In the standard insertion technique (SIT), the electrode array slides along the lateral wall during insertion. 2) In the Advance Off Stylet (Cochlear Ltd. Sydney) technique (AOS), the electrode maintains modiolar contact throughout the insertion process. A set of 22 insertions were performed in temporal bone specimens using perimodiolar electrode arrays with both AOS and SIT. Buffered saline was used as a substitute for natural perilymph based on similar electrical conductivity properties. Impedance with and without stylet removal were recorded with a 30-second sampling window at final insertion depth.

RESULTS

There is a significant difference in bipolar impedance measures between AOS and SIT, with impedances rising in measurements with stylet removal. Evaluation was based on two-sided analysis of variance considering technique and electrode with P < 0.025.

CONCLUSION

Bipolar electrical impedance can be used to detect relative motion toward the modiolus inside the cochlea. This detection method has the potential to optimize intraoperative placement of perimodiolar electrode arrays during implantation. We anticipate that this will result in lower excitation thresholds and improved hearing outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA. Laryngoscope, 127:1413-1419, 2017.

Robot-assisted perception augmentation for online detection of insertion failure during cochlear implant surgery

During the past decade, robotics for cochlear implant electrode array insertion has been limited to manipulation assistance. Going beyond manipulation assistance, this paper presents the new concept of perception augmentation to detect and warn against the onset of intracochlear electrode array tip folding. This online failure detection method uses a combination of intraoperative electrode insertion force data and a predictive model of insertion force profile progression as a function of insertion depth. The predictive model uses statistical characterization of insertion force profiles during normal robotic electrode array insertions as well as the history of intra-operative insertion forces. Online detection of onset of tip folding is achieved using the predictive model as an input into a support vector machine classifier. Results show that the detection of tip folding onset can be achieved with an accuracy of 88% despite the use of intra-operative insertion force data representing incomplete insertion. This result is significant because it allows the surgeon or robot to choose a corrective action for preventing intra-cochlear complications.

A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

The trauma caused during cochlear implant insertion can lead to cell death and a loss of residual hair cells in the cochlea. Various therapeutic approaches have been studied to prevent cochlear implant-induced residual hearing loss with limited success. In the present study, we show the efficacy of mild to moderate therapeutic hypothermia of 4 to 6 °C applied to the cochlea in reducing residual hearing loss associated with the electrode insertion trauma.

APPROACH

Rats were randomly distributed in three groups: control contralateral cochleae, normothermic implanted cochleae and hypothermic implanted cochleae. Localized hypothermia was delivered to the middle turn of the cochlea for 20 min before and after implantation using a custom-designed probe perfused with cooled fluorocarbon. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded to assess the hearing function prior to and post-cochlear implantation at various time points up to 30 days. At the conclusion of the trials, inner ears were harvested for histology and cell count. The approach was extended to cadaver temporal bones to study the potential surgical approach and efficacy of our device. In this case, the hypothermia probe was placed next to the round window niche via the facial recess or a myringotomy.

MAIN RESULTS

A significant loss of residual hearing was observed in the normothermic implant group. Comparatively, the residual hearing in the cochleae receiving therapeutic hypothermia was significantly conserved. Histology confirmed a significant loss of outer hair cells in normothermic cochleae receiving the surgical trauma when compared to the hypothermia treated group. In human temporal bones, a controlled and effective cooling of the cochlea was achieved using our approach.

SIGNIFICANCE

Collectively, these results suggest that therapeutic hypothermia during cochlear implantation may reduce traumatic effects of electrode insertion and improve conservation of residual hearing.

The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones

HYPOTHESIS

To analyze the quality of insertion of the newly developed midscala (MS) electrode, which targets a midscalar electrode position to reduce the risk of trauma to the lateral wall and the modiolus.

BACKGROUND

Modern cochlear implant surgery aims for a safe intracochlear placement of electrode arrays with an ongoing debate regarding cochleostomy or round window (RW) insertion and the use of lateral wall or perimodiolar electrode placement. Intracochlear trauma after insertion of different electrodes depends on insertion mode and electrode design and may result in trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlear.

METHODS

We performed a temporal bone (TB) trial with insertion of the MS electrode in n = 20 TB's after a mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. Insertion was performed either via the RW or a cochleostomy. Electrode positioning, length of insertion, and angle of insertion were analyzed with rotational tomography (RT). TBs were histologically analyzed. Results of RT and histology were compared.

RESULTS

Scala tympani (ST) insertion could be accomplished reliably by both RW and via a cochleostomy approach. In 20 TBs, 1 scala vestibuli insertion, 1 incomplete (ST), and 1 elevation of basilar membrane were depicted. No trauma was found in 94.7% of all ST insertions. RT allowed determination of the intracochlear electrode position, which was specified by histologic sectioning.

CONCLUSION

The new MS electrode seems to fulfill reliable atraumatic intracochlear placement via RW and cochleostomy approaches. RT is available for evaluation of intracochlear electrode position, serving as a potential quality control instrument in human implantation.

Modeling of Auditory Neuron Response Thresholds with Cochlear Implants

The quality of the prosthetic-neural interface is a critical point for cochlear implant efficiency. It depends not only on technical and anatomical factors such as electrode position into the cochlea (depth and scalar placement), electrode impedance, and distance between the electrode and the stimulated auditory neurons, but also on the number of functional auditory neurons. The efficiency of electrical stimulation can be assessed by the measurement of e-CAP in cochlear implant users. In the present study, we modeled the activation of auditory neurons in cochlear implant recipients (nucleus device). The electrical response, measured using auto-NRT (neural responses telemetry) algorithm, has been analyzed using multivariate regression with cubic splines in order to take into account the variations of insertion depth of electrodes amongst subjects as well as the other technical and anatomical factors listed above. NRT thresholds depend on the electrode squared impedance (β = -0.11 ± 0.02, P < 0.01), the scalar placement of the electrodes (β = -8.50 ± 1.97, P < 0.01), and the depth of insertion calculated as the characteristic frequency of auditory neurons (CNF). Distribution of NRT residues according to CNF could provide a proxy of auditory neurons functioning in implanted cochleas.

Scanning electrochemical microscopy as a novel proximity sensor for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion

A growing number of minimally invasive surgical and diagnostic procedures require the insertion of an optical, mechanical, or electronic device in narrow spaces inside a human body. In such procedures, precise motion control is essential to avoid damage to the patient's tissues and/or the device itself. A typical example is the insertion of a cochlear implant which should ideally be done with minimum physical contact between the moving device and the cochlear canal walls or the basilar membrane. Because optical monitoring is not possible, alternative techniques for sub millimeter-scale distance control can be very useful for such procedures. The first requirement for distance control is distance sensing. We developed a novel approach to distance sensing based on the principles of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The SECM signal, i.e., the diffusion current to a microelectrode, is very sensitive to the distance between the probe surface and any electrically insulating object present in its proximity. With several amperometric microprobes fabricated on the surface of an insertable device, one can monitor the distances between different parts of the moving implant and the surrounding tissues. Unlike typical SECM experiments, in which a disk-shaped tip approaches a relatively smooth sample, complex geometries of the mobile device and its surroundings make distance sensing challenging. Additional issues include the possibility of electrode surface contamination in biological fluids and the requirement for a biologically compatible redox mediator.

Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the prevalence of electrode failures and electrode impedance measures in Nucleus cochlear implants around initial activation (an average of 16 days after surgery) and after 8 to 12 years of device use.

DESIGN

Retrospective data from the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic was collated and analysed.

STUDY SAMPLE

Included in this study were 232 adults, all of whom were implanted at the clinic between March 1998 and August 2005.

RESULTS

Overall 0.5% of electrodes failed over the entire test period, with 5.6% of devices showing one or more electrode failure. The majority of these failures were recorded by initial activation. The numbers of electrode failures have decreased over time with array type, such that no failures were recorded with the currently available Contour Advance array. Array type was shown to affect electrode impedance at both time points, with the Contour and Contour Advance arrays having significantly higher absolute values than the Banded array. However, the Banded array had significantly higher area-normalized impedances at initial and final measures than the Contour and Contour Advance array.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively low incidence of electrode failures were recorded for the Nucleus devices of these recipients. Electrode impedance dropped for all array types after 8 to 12 years of device use.

Round window insertion of precurved electrodes is traumatic

OBJECTIVE

Assess endocochlear trauma by adjusting: 1) location of cochleostomy or round window insertion, and 2) size of precontoured electrode array.

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric temporal bone study.

METHODS

Locations of electrode placement into the cochlea were as follows: 1) round window, 2) anterior inferior to the round window, 3) anterior inferior to the round window niche, 4) superior to the round window niche. Two types of electrode arrays were used: a larger precontoured electrode and thinner precurved research electrode. Histologic sections were made by a blinded third party.

RESULTS

Fourteen bones were included in the study. Six (42.8%) of the bones were right ears. Seven bones had no endocochlear trauma. Seven bones have intracochlear trauma. Round window insertions had a high incidence of intracochlear trauma with precontoured electrodes (3/4 bones). Superior cochleostomies with electrode placement had significant intracochlear trauma (2/2 bones). Insertions made anterior inferior to the round window annulus had a 50% incidence of intracochlear trauma (2/4 bones). No endocochlear trauma observed for insertions through traditional cochleostomies (4/4 bones). Less endocochlear trauma was observed with the thinner electrode: 57% versus 42% in the larger electrode array. A higher incidence of tip fold-over was observed with the thinner electrode array (2/7 electrodes). No tip fold-over was noted in the larger electrode.

CONCLUSION

The traditional cochleostomy had the least incidence of endocochlear trauma. The smaller electrode array did not significantly affect the incidence of endocochlear trauma, but the thinner array had a higher incidence of tip fold-over, which caused trauma distally.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2C.

A novel perfusion-based method for cochlear implant electrode insertion

A cochlear implant (CI) restores partial hearing to profoundly deaf individuals. CI electrodes are inserted manually in the cochlea and surgeons rely on tactile feedback from the implant to determine when to stop the insertion. This manual insertion method results in a large degree of variability in surgical outcomes and intra-cochlear trauma. Additionally, implants often span only the basal turn. In the present study we report on the development of a new method to assist CI electrode insertion. The design objectives are (1) an automated and standardized insertion technique across patients with (2) more apical insertion than is possible by the contemporary methods, while (3) minimizing insertion trauma. The method relies on a viscous fluid flow through the cochlea to carry the electrode array with it. A small cochleostomy (∼100-150 um in diameter) is made in scala vestibuli (SV) and the round window (RW) membrane is opened. A flow of diluted Sodium Hyaluronate (also known as Hyaluronic Acid, (HA)) is set up from the RW to the SV opening using a perfusion pump that sets up a unidirectional flow. Once the flow is established an implant is dropped into the ongoing flow. Here we present a proof-of-concept study where we used this technique to insert silicone implants all the way to the cochlear apex in rats and gerbils. In light-microscopic histology, the implantation occurred without cochlear trauma. To further assess the ototoxicity of the HA perfusion, we measured compound action potential (CAP) thresholds following the perfusion of HA, and found that the CAP thresholds were substantially elevated. Thus, at this point the method is promising, and requires further development to become clinically viable.

Development of a safe dexamethasone-eluting electrode array for cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implantation can result in trauma leading to increased tissue response and loss of residual hearing. A single intratympanic application of the corticosteroid dexamethasone is sometimes used clinically during surgery to combat the potential effect of trauma on residual hearing. This project looked at the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone eluted from an intracochlear array in vivo.

METHODS

Three trials were conducted using normal hearing adult guinea pigs implanted with successive iterations of dexamethasone-eluting (DX1, DX2, and DX3) or non-eluting (control) intracochlear electrode arrays. The experimental period for each animal was 90 days during which hearing tests were performed at multiple time points.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between matched control array and dexamethasone array groups in terms of spiral ganglion neuron density, organ of Corti condition, or fibrosis and ossification. A cochleostomy seal was present in all implanted cochleae. There were no differences in the degree of hearing threshold shifts between DX1 and DX3 and their respective control arrays. Cochleae implanted with DX2 arrays showed less hearing loss and marginally better spiral ganglion neuron survival than their control array counterparts. Post-explant inspection of the DX2 and DX3 arrays revealed a difference in pore density following dexamethasone elution.

CONCLUSION

The dexamethasone doses used were safe in the guinea pig cochlea. Dexamethasone did not inhibit formation of a cochleostomy seal. The level of hearing protection afforded by dexamethasone eluting from an intracochlear array may depend upon the degree of elution and level of trauma inflicted.

Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani

CONCLUSIONS

The round window membrane (RWM)-intentioned approach is superior to the traditional bony cochleostomy (BC) approach in obtaining electrode placement within the scala tympani (ST).

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implant outcome is influenced by several factors, including optimal placement and retention of the electrode array within the ST. The present study aimed to assess whether the RWM route is superior to a traditional BC for placement and retention of the electrode array in the ST.

METHODS

This was a prospective consecutive non-randomized comparison study. All patients were implanted with the Advanced Bionics 1J electrode array. The RWM approach (n = 32) was compared with a traditional BC group (n = 33). The outcome measure was the electrode position as judged within the scalar chambers at four points along the basal turn using postoperative computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

When the mean position scores were compared, the RWM-intentioned group had significantly more electrodes directed towards the ST compartment than the BC group (p < 0.001). The RWM electrodes achieved 94% ST retention compared with 64% for the BC group (p < 0.05). All electrodes stayed in the ST in the RWM group, whereas in the BC group 9% crossed from the ST to the scala vestibuli.

Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relationship between implantation-associated trauma and postoperative speech perception scores among adult and pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation using conventional length electrodes and minimally traumatic surgical techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review (2002-2010).

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

All subjects with significant preoperative low-frequency hearing (≤70 dB HL at 250 Hz) who underwent cochlear implantation with a newer generation implant electrode (Nucleus Contour Advance, Advanced Bionics HR90K [1J and Helix], and Med El Sonata standard H array) were reviewed.

INTERVENTION(S)

Preimplant and postimplant audiometric thresholds and speech recognition scores were recorded using the electronic medical record.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Postimplantation pure tone threshold shifts were used as a surrogate measure for extent of intracochlear injury and correlated with postoperative speech perception scores.

RESULTS

: Between 2002 and 2010, 703 cochlear implant (CI) operations were performed. Data from 126 implants were included in the analysis. The mean preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average was 55.4 dB HL. Hearing preservation was observed in 55% of patients. Patients with hearing preservation were found to have significantly higher postoperative speech perception performance in the CI-only condition than those who lost all residual hearing.

CONCLUSION

Conservation of acoustic hearing after conventional length cochlear implantation is unpredictable but remains a realistic goal. The combination of improved technology and refined surgical technique may allow for conservation of some residual hearing in more than 50% of patients. Germane to the conventional length CI recipient with substantial hearing loss, minimizing trauma allows for improved speech perception in the electric condition. These findings support the use of minimally traumatic techniques in all CI recipients, even those destined for electric-only stimulation.

Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes

OBJECTIVES

This review examines evidence for potential benefits of using cochlear implant electrodes that extend into the apical regions of the cochlea. Most cochlear implant systems use electrode arrays that extend 1 to 1.5 turns from the basal cochleostomy, but one manufacturer (MED-EL GmbH) uses an electrode array that is considerably longer. The fundamental rationale for using electrodes extending toward the apex of the cochlea is to provide additional low-pitched auditory percepts and thereby increase the spectral information available to the user. Several experimental long arrays have also been produced by other manufacturers to assess potential benefits of this approach.

DESIGN

In addition to assessing the effects of deeply inserted electrodes on performance, this review examines several underlying and associated issues, including cochlear anatomy, electrode design, surgical considerations (including insertion trauma), and pitch scaling trials. Where possible, the aim is to draw conclusions regarding the potential from apical electrodes in general, rather than relating to the performance of specific and current devices.

RESULTS

Imaging studies indicate that currently available electrode arrays rarely extend more than two turns into the cochlea, the mean insertion angle for full insertions of the MED-EL electrodes being about 630°. This is considerably shorter than the total length of the cochlea and more closely approximates the length of the spiral ganglion. Anatomical considerations, and some modelling studies, suggest that fabrication of even longer electrodes is unlikely to provide additional spectral information. The issue of potential benefit from the most apical electrodes, therefore, is whether they are able to selectively stimulate discrete and tonotopically ordered neural populations near the apex of the spiral ganglion, where the ganglion cells are closely grouped. Pitch scaling studies, using the MED-EL and experimental long arrays, suggest that this is achieved in many cases, but that a significant number of individuals show evidence of pitch confusions or reversals among the most apical electrodes, presumably reducing potential performance benefit and presenting challenges for processor programming.

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits in terms of speech recognition and other performance measures are less clear. Several studies have indicated that deactivation of apical electrodes results in poorer speech recognition performance, but these have been mostly acute studies where the subjects have been accustomed to the full complement of electrodes, thus making interpretation difficult. Some chronic studies have suggested that apical electrodes do provide additional performance benefit, but others have shown performance improvement after deactivating some of the apical electrodes. Whether or not deeply inserted electrodes can offer performance benefits, there is evidence that currently available designs tend to produce more intracochlear trauma than shorter arrays, in terms of loss of residual acoustic hearing and reduction of the neural substrate. This may have important long-term consequences for the user. Furthermore, as it is possible that subjects with better low-frequency residual hearing are more likely to benefit from the inclusion of apical electrodes, there may be a potential clinical dilemma as the same subjects are those most likely to benefit from bimodal electroacoustic stimulation, requiring a relatively shallow insertion.