1
|
Rantala ES, Hernberg MM, Piperno-Neumann S, Grossniklaus HE, Kivelä TT. Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier. Prog Retin Eye Res 2022; 90:101041. [PMID: 34999237 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina S Rantala
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Micaela M Hernberg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Paciuksenkatu 3, PL 180, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | - Hans E Grossniklaus
- Section of Ocular Oncology, Emory Eye Center, 1365 Clifton Road B, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Tero T Kivelä
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodriguez-Vidal C, Fernandez-Diaz D, Fernandez-Marta B, Lago-Baameiro N, Pardo M, Silva P, Paniagua L, Blanco-Teijeiro MJ, Piñeiro A, Bande M. Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2557. [PMID: 32911759 PMCID: PMC7565536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease. METHODS A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically. RESULTS After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Rodriguez-Vidal
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cruces, Cruces Plaza S/N, 48903 Barakaldo-Vizcaya, Spain;
| | - Daniel Fernandez-Diaz
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Beatriz Fernandez-Marta
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
| | - Nerea Lago-Baameiro
- Grupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - María Pardo
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
- Grupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - Paula Silva
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Clinical University Hospital, SERGAS, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Laura Paniagua
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Coruña, Praza Parrote s/n, 15006 A Coruña, Spain;
| | - María José Blanco-Teijeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Antonio Piñeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Manuel Bande
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
| | - Hai-Feng Liu
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
| | - Yu-Lan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu LT, Funchain PF, Bena JF, Li M, Tarhini A, Berber E, Singh AD. Uveal Melanoma Metastatic to the Liver: Treatment Trends and Outcomes. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2019; 5:323-332. [PMID: 31559243 DOI: 10.1159/000495113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe treatment trends and outcomes of liver metastasis from uveal melanoma. Methods Retrospective case series of 73 patients with uveal melanoma liver metastasis. Patients were treated first-line with systemic therapy (not including checkpoint inhibitors), checkpoint inhibitors, local therapy or no treatment. Time to metastasis, detection method, and survival data were collected. Time periods were divided between 2004-2011 and 2012-2016. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort was 4 months (95% CI 3-5) and 15 months (95% CI 11-18), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS across the two time periods. Patients who received no treatment had the shortest OS (median 4.9 months), whereas those treated with local therapy had the longest PFS (median 4.6 months) and OS (median 18.7 months). Having liver metastasis diagnosed by symptoms was associated with a greater risk of mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusion Patients who received first-line local treatment had the longest PFS and OS, while patients who received no treatment had the shortest OS. Survival outcomes did not improve for patients including those receiving check point inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy T Xu
- Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pauline F Funchain
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James F Bena
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Manshi Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ahmad Tarhini
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eren Berber
- Center for Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Arun D Singh
- Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baily C, O'Neill V, Dunne M, Cunningham M, Gullo G, Kennedy S, Walsh PM, Deady S, Horgan N. Uveal Melanoma in Ireland. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2018; 5:195-204. [PMID: 31049328 DOI: 10.1159/000492391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report the clinical features and epidemiology of uveal melanoma in Ireland. Methods This was an observational study of 253 patients with a new diagnosis of uveal melanoma between June 2010 and December 2015. Main outcome measures included demographics, clinical features, age-adjusted incidence, relative survival, overall survival, and distant metastases-free survival. Results The mean patient age was 61.7 years. Tumour location was choroidal in 82%, ciliochoroidal in 9%, iridociliary in 2%, and iris in 7%. Treatment modalities included brachytherapy (ruthenium-106 and iodine-125 [64%]), enucleation (27%), and proton beam radiation (8%). The mean age-adjusted incidence of uveal melanoma in Ireland from 2010 to 2015 was 9.5 per million of the population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4-10.7). Four-year relative survival was 81.3% (95% CI: 72.8-87.3). Four-year overall survival was 84% (95% CI: 78-90) and 4-year distant metastases-free survival was 79% (95% CI: 73-86). Conclusion Based on this data, the incidence of uveal melanoma in Ireland is high when compared with other reported incidence rates in Europe and worldwide. Relative and observed survival were in keeping with other reported European survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mary Dunne
- Clinical Trials Unit, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Susan Kennedy
- Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Noel Horgan
- Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Melanomas affecting different components of the uvea occur with differing frequencies and clinical presentations. Uveal melanoma is diagnosed via funduscopic exam and ancillary tests. These lesions may present with visual findings or incidental findings on physical exam. Metastasis occurs in approximately half of all patients with primary uveal melanoma. The liver is the most common site of metastasis. Enucleation was at one time considered the definitive local treatment for primary uveal melanoma, but has been largely replaced by other therapeutic procedures that aim to prevent metastasis while preserving vision. Unfortunately, metastasis of uveal melanoma almost always proves to be fatal. The current treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma is limited by the intrinsic resistance of uveal melanoma to conventional systemic therapies. Advancements in molecular biology have resulted in the identification of a number of promising prognostic and therapeutic targets. Early detection and therapy are important factors in disease survival. It is imperative that the treating physician be familiar with the clinical features of uveal melanoma and distinguish it from mimickers in order to ensure effective and timely treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Priya Durairaj
- Department of Ocular Oncology, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jensen Yeung
- Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Long-term survival in a patient with unresectable liver metastases from uveal melanoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization with irinotecan eluting beads - case report and review of literature. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2017; 21:244-248. [PMID: 29180934 PMCID: PMC5701586 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2017.70115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Treatment of unresectable liver metastases (LM) from uveal melanoma (UM) remains a major clinical challenge. Systemic chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy regimens extrapolated from cutaneous melanoma are considered to be ineffective in therapy of metastases from uveal melanoma. Studies suggest that the progression of hepatic metastases rather than the primary tumor or metastases in other organs determines survival. Case report We report a case of transarterial chemoembolization of 57-year-old man diagnosed with unresectable liver metastases from uveal melanoma with irinotecan eluting beads. Therapy resulted in long progression free survival and overall survival, 41 months and 45 months after diagnosis of metastatic disease respectively. Patient did not experience any major side effects of the therapy. Follow-up CTs indicate stable disease in mRECIST criteria and partial response in CHOI criteria. Conclusions Transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan may be an effective treatment of unresectable liver metastases from uveal melanoma.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kivelä TT, Piperno-Neumann S, Desjardins L, Schmittel A, Bechrakis N, Midena E, Leyvraz S, Zografos L, Grange JD, Ract-Madoux G, Marshall E, Damato B, Eskelin S. Validation of a Prognostic Staging for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Collaborative Study of the European Ophthalmic Oncology Group. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 168:217-226. [PMID: 27296487 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate a staging system for metastatic uveal melanoma that will facilitate planning, reporting, and interpreting the results of clinical trials. DESIGN Reliability and validity study. METHODS The performance index, the largest diameter of the largest metastasis and alkaline phosphatase level at the time of diagnosis of metastases, and overall survival of 249 patients from 7 ocular oncology centers who died of dissemination were analyzed. Predicted median survival time calculated according to the Helsinki University Hospital Working Formulation was used to assign patients to stages IVa, IVb, and IVc, which correspond to predicted survival times of ≥12, <12-6, and <6 months, respectively. The predictions were compared against observed survival. RESULTS The 3 variables used to assign stage were independent predictors of survival in the validation dataset. Of the 249 patients, 110 (44%), 109 (44%), and 30 (12%) were classified to Working Formulation stages IVa, IVb, and IVc, respectively. Corresponding median observed survival times were 18.6, 10.7, and 4.6 months and worsened by increasing stage (P < .001). Of 201 patients managed without surgical resection of metastases, 83 (41%), 89 (44%), and 29 (15%) were classified to stages IVa, IVb, and IVc, respectively, and their median observed survival times were 17.2, 10.0, and 4.6 months (P < .001). Survival of 47 patients who underwent resection did not differ by working formulation stage (P = .69). CONCLUSIONS This multicenter study confirms that the Working Formulation is a reliable and valid, repeatable system for dividing metastatic uveal melanoma into distinct prognostic subgroups, especially for stage-specific reporting of survival in prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tero T Kivelä
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | | - Edoardo Midena
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Serge Leyvraz
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Daniel Grange
- Department of Ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse Hospital and Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Ract-Madoux
- Department of Ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse Hospital and Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Ernest Marshall
- Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Bebington, Wirral, Merseyside, United Kingdom
| | - Bertil Damato
- St Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Eskelin
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agarwala SS, Eggermont AMM, O'Day S, Zager JS. Metastatic melanoma to the liver: a contemporary and comprehensive review of surgical, systemic, and regional therapeutic options. Cancer 2014; 120:781-9. [PMID: 24301420 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Effective management of hepatic metastases from ocular and cutaneous melanoma remains a major therapeutic challenge. Treatment options include hepatic resection, hepatic intra-arterial (HIA) chemotherapy, chemoembolization, and hepatic perfusions. Evaluating the efficacy of these interventions is limited by the retrospective nature of most of the data, although controlled phase 3 studies are starting to emerge. Studies of hepatic resection are strongly suggestive of a survival benefit following surgery in selected patients. Effective systemic agents for metastatic cutaneous melanoma are available and supported by randomized controlled phase 3 trials. In contrast, no active systemic treatment has yet been identified for metastatic ocular melanoma. HIA and intravenous delivery of fotemustine have been compared in a randomized phase 3 trial in patients with unresectable metastases from melanoma, but no differences between the 2 approaches were observed. Hepatic arterial chemoembolization appears only to be moderately effective according to uncontrolled studies; targeting patients with less liver involvement may improve outcomes. A recent phase 3 study showed a significant improvement in hepatic progression-free survival with percutaneous hepatic perfusion compared with best alternative care in patients with metastatic melanoma; however, the overall survival analysis was confounded by crossover of control patients to active treatment. In conclusion, hepatic resection offers the possibility of long-term survival in carefully selected patients with liver-limited metastases from melanoma. In patients with unresectable cutaneous melanoma, effective systemic therapy is the best treatment option. For patients with unresectable ocular melanoma, regional treatments are likely to assume a greater role until effective systemic treatments are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjiv S Agarwala
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lodh S, Maher R, Guminski A. Intra-arterial infusion and chemo-embolization for melanoma liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2014; 109:376-82. [PMID: 24500702 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This article will review the rationale for hepatic arterial administration of agents to treat melanoma liver metastases, the techniques and practical considerations pertinent to hepatic arterial therapy, the variety of agents that have been used and the reported outcomes. Recent and emerging developments will be highlighted and the potential role of liver-directed therapies in the context of molecular advances and improved systemic therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhrid Lodh
- Department of Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|