High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot study

Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of ultraviolet A1 treatment in early-stage mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas primarily involving the skin. Early-stage MF is characterised by non-specific skin lesions and non-diagnostic biopsies. While skin-focused treatments, such as PUVA and narrowband UVB (nbUVB), are the most frequently recommended treatments, the UVA1 efficacy has been researched in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical aspects of UVA1 treatment in patients with early-stage MF.

METHODS

The modified severity weighted assessment scale (mSWAT) was used for total skin body scoring before and after treatment. Skin punch biopsies were taken from the patients before and after treatment. UVA1 therapy was performed five times each week.

RESULTS

This study included 26 patients with early-stage MF. The total number of UVA1 sessions varied between 15 and 34. Complete response was observed in 8 (30.8%) of 26 patients (30.8%). The median mSWAT score decreased statistically significantly from 7.1 to 2.0 after treatment (p < .001). Histopathological complete response was observed in 2 (9.5%) of 21 patients. A statistically significant decrease in dermal interstitial infiltrate was observed on histopathological examination after treatment (p = .039). Epidermal CD4/CD8 levels decreased statistically significantly higher from a median of 2.5-1.2 in the complete clinical response group after treatment (p = .043).

CONCLUSION

According to our results, UVA1 treatment has an effect on early-stage MF in terms of clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemistry.

Heterogeneity of determining disease severity, clinical course and outcomes in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic literature review

Objective The course of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is highly variable and different from continuously progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Most proposed definitions of progressive pulmonary fibrosis or SSc-ILD severity are based on the research data from patients with IPF and are not validated for patients with SSc-ILD. Our study aimed to gather the current evidence for severity, progression and outcomes of SSc-ILD.Methods A systematic literature review to search for definitions of severity, progression and outcomes recorded for SSc-ILD was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023.Results A total of 9054 papers were reviewed and 342 were finally included. The most frequent tools used for the definition of SSc-ILD progression and severity were combined changes of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC), isolated FVC or DLCO changes, high-resolution CT (HRCT) extension and composite algorithms including pulmonary function test, clinical signs and HRCT data. Mortality was the most frequently reported long-term event, both from all causes or ILD related.Conclusions The studies presenting definitions of SSc-ILD 'progression', 'severity' and 'outcome' show a large heterogeneity. These results emphasise the need for developing a standardised, consensus definition of severe SSc-ILD, to link a disease specific definition of progression as a surrogate outcome for clinical trials and clinical practice.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022379254.Cite Now.

Remission of severe myasthenia gravis after autologous stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoantibody-mediated neuromuscular junction disorder involving the acetylcholine receptors on the motor endplate. The safety and response to high-dose chemotherapy (HDIT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) were assessed in a patient with severe refractory MG.

METHODS

As part of a pilot study of HDIT/HCT for patients with treatment-resistant autoimmune neurological disorders, a patient with severe refractory MG underwent treatment. After mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with rituximab, prednisone, and G-CSF, the patient had HDIT consisting of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin, followed by autologous HCT. The effect of treatment on the autoantibody to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) was assessed.

RESULTS

The patient had been diagnosed with AChR antibody-positive MG 14 years before HDIT/HCT and had failed thymectomy, therapeutic plasma exchange, and multiple immunomodulatory agents. The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification was IVb before HDIT/HCT. She tolerated HDIT/HCT well and started to improve clinically within days of treatment. At both 1 and 2 years after HDIT/HCT, patients remained symptom-free. After HDIT/HCT, AChR-binding autoantibodies persisted, and the relative frequency of immune cell subtypes shifted.

INTERPRETATION

HDIT/HCT induced a complete response of disease activity in a patient with severe refractory MG. This response may suggest that a cell-mediated etiology may be a significant contributing factor in refractory MG cases. A phase 2 clinical trial is warranted to establish if HDIT/HCT can be an effective therapy for severe refractory MG and to gain a further understanding of disease pathogenesis.

Cardiotoxicity in autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is now well-established as an effective treatment for severe systemic sclerosis with clear demonstration of favourable end-organ and survival outcomes. Treatment-related cardiotoxicity remains the predominant safety concern and contraindicates autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease. In this review, we describe the cardiovascular outcomes of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients, discuss the potential mechanisms of cardiotoxicity and propose future mitigating strategies.

Improving outcomes in scleroderma: recent progress of cell-based therapies

Scleroderma is a rare, potentially fatal, clinically heterogeneous, systemic autoimmune connective tissue disorder that is characterized by progressive fibrosis of the skin and visceral organs, vasculopathy and immune dysregulation. The more severe form of the disease, diffuse cutaneous scleroderma (dcSSc), has no cure and limited treatment options. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation has emerged as a potentially disease-modifying treatment but faces challenges such as toxicity associated with fully myeloablative conditioning and recurrence of autoimmunity. Novel cell therapies-such as mesenchymal stem cells, chimeric antigen receptor-based therapy, tolerogenic dendritic cells and facilitating cells-that may restore self-tolerance with more favourable safety and tolerability profiles are being explored for the treatment of dcSSc and other autoimmune diseases. This narrative review examines these evolving cell therapies.

Risk Factors for Respiratory Failure in Patients Hospitalized With Systemic Sclerosis: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Background Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients are at high risk for respiratory failure due to the progression of their disease. Investigating factors predictive of impending respiratory failure in this patient population can be used to improve hospital outcomes. Here, we investigate risk factors associated with developing respiratory failure in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of SSc in the United States using a large, multi-year, population-based dataset. Methodology This retrospective study was conducted on SSc hospitalizations from 2016 to 2019 with and without a principal diagnosis of respiratory failure from the United States National Inpatient Sample database. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR_adj) for respiratory failure. Results There were 3,930 SSc hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of respiratory failure and 94,910 SSc hospitalizations without a diagnosis of respiratory failure. Among SSc hospitalizations, multivariable analysis showed that the following were associated with a principal diagnosis of respiratory failure: Charlson comorbidity index (OR_adj = 1.05), heart failure (OR_adj = 1.81), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (OR_adj = 3.62), pneumonia (OR_adj = 3.40), pulmonary hypertension (OR_adj = 3.59), and smoking (OR_adj = 1.42). Conclusions This analysis represents the largest sample to date in assessing risk factors for respiratory failure among SSc inpatients. Charlson comorbidity index, heart failure, ILD, pulmonary hypertension, smoking, and pneumonia were associated with higher odds of inpatient respiratory failure. Patients with respiratory failure had higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without it. Outpatient optimization and inpatient recognition of these risk factors can lead to improved hospitalization outcomes for SSc patients.

Benefits and risks of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with systemic sclerosis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were carried out. We compared survival outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier method with patient-level data between HSCT and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide. Additionally, the incidence rate of treatment-related deaths with HSCT was pooled using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Of the 2091 articles screened, 22 were included: 3 randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies. HSCT studies showed significant improvement in the skin thickness score and lung function. Despite treatment-related deaths being higher in HSCT than in intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a high survival rate of 2 years post-transplant (log-rank, P = 0.004). The pooled frequency of transplant-related death from 700 systemic sclerosis patients was 6.30% (95% confidence interval 4.21-8.38). However, the estimated frequency of treatment-related deaths has been reducing over the last decade.

CONCLUSIONS

HSCT is an effective treatment for systemic sclerosis, but the optimal indications must be carefully determined by balancing the risks.

Myeloablative autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation resets the B cell repertoire to a more naïve state in patients with systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

Myeloablative autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) was recently demonstrated to provide significant benefit over cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) in the Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation (SCOT) trial. As dysregulation of the B cell compartment has previously been described in dcSSc, we sought to gain insight into the effects of myeloablative autologous HSCT as compared with CYC.

METHODS

We sequenced the peripheral blood immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) repertoires in patients with dcSSc enrolled in the SCOT trial.

RESULTS

Myeloablative autologous HSCT was associated with a sustained increase in IgM isotype antibodies bearing a low mutation rate. Clonal expression was reduced in IGH repertoires following myeloablative autologous HSCT. Additionally, we identified a underusage of immunoglobulin heavy chain V gene 5-51 in patients with dcSSc, and usage normalised following myeloablative autologous HSCT but not CYC treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these findings suggest that myeloablative autologous HSCT resets the IGH repertoire to a more naïve state characterised by IgM-expressing B cells, providing a possible mechanism for the elimination of pathogenic B cells that may contribute to the benefit of HSCT over CYC in the treatment of dcSSc.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Systemic Sclerosis-A Review

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune, multi-organ, connective tissue disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional immunosuppressive therapies demonstrate limited efficacy. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is more efficacious but carries associated risks, including treatment-related mortality. Here, we review HCT as a treatment for SSc, its efficacy and toxicity in comparison to conventional therapies, and the proposed mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of and recent developments in patient selection. Finally, we highlight the knowledge gaps and future work required to further improve patient outcomes.

Reconstitution of the immune system and clinical correlates after stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease that includes fibrosis, diffuse vasculopathy, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) is considered for patients with severe and progressive SSc. In recent decades, knowledge about patient management and clinical outcomes after auto-HSCT has significantly improved. Mechanistic studies have contributed to increasing the comprehension of how profound and long-lasting are the modifications to the immune system induced by transplantation. This review revisits the immune monitoring studies after auto-HSCT for SSc patients and how they relate to clinical outcomes. This understanding is essential to further improve clinical applications of auto-HSCT and enhance patient outcomes.

Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by systemic inflammation, fibrosis, vascular injury, reduced quality of life, and limited treatment options. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has emerged as a potential intervention for severe SSc refractory to conventional treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (specifically, non-selective myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide; selective myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide; non-selective non-myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries from database insertion to 4 February 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that compared HSCT to immunomodulators in the treatment of SSc.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted study data, and performed risk of bias and GRADE assessments to assess the certainty of evidence using standard Cochrane methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs evaluating: non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT (10 participants), non-myeloablative selective HSCT (79 participants), and myeloablative selective HSCT (36 participants). The comparator in all studies was cyclophosphamide (123 participants). The study examining non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT had a high risk of bias given the differences in baseline characteristics between the two arms. The other studies had a high risk of detection bias for participant-reported outcomes. The studies had follow-up periods of one to 4.5 years. Most participants had severe disease, mean age 40 years, and the duration of disease was less than three years. Efficacy No study demonstrated an overall mortality benefit of HSCT when compared to cyclophosphamide. However, non-myeloablative selective HSCT showed overall survival benefits using Kaplan-Meier curves at 10 years and myeloablative selective HSCT at six years. We graded our certainty of evidence as moderate for non-myeloablative selective HSCT and myeloablative selective HSCT. Certainty of evidence was low for non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT. Event-free survival was improved compared to cyclophosphamide with non-myeloablative selective HSCT at 48 months (hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.74; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no improvement with myeloablative selective HSCT at 54 months (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.23 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not report event-free survival. There was improvement in functional ability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI, scale from 0 to 3 with 3 being very severe functional impairment) with non-myeloablative selective HSCT after two years with a mean difference (MD) of -0.39 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.06; absolute treatment benefit (ATB) -13%, 95% CI -24% to -2%; relative percent change (RPC) -27%, 95% CI -50% to -4%; low-certainty evidence). Myeloablative selective HSCT demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) for improvement of 3.4 at 54 months (95% CI 1.5 to 7.6; ATB -37%, 95% CI -18% to -57%; RPC -243%, 95% CI -54% to -662%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 2 to 9; low-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not report HAQ-DI results. All transplant modalities showed improvement of modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) (scale from 0 to 51 with the higher number being more severe skin thickness) favoring HSCT over cyclophosphamide. At two years, non-myeloablative selective HSCT showed an MD in mRSS of -11.1 (95% CI -14.9 to -7.3; ATB -22%, 95% CI -29% to -14%; RPC -43%, 95% CI -58% to -28%; moderate-certainty evidence). At 54 months, myeloablative selective HSCT at showed a greater improvement in skin scores than the cyclophosphamide group (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.13; ATB -27%, 95% CI -6% to -47%; RPC -51%, 95% CI -6% to -113%; moderate-certainty evidence). The NNTB was 4 (95% CI 3 to 18). At one year, for non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT the MD was -16.00 (95% CI -26.5 to -5.5; ATB -31%, 95% CI -52% to -11%; RPC -84%, 95% CI -139% to -29%; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported data on pulmonary arterial hypertension. Adverse events In the non-myeloablative selective HSCT study, there were 51/79 serious adverse events with HSCT and 30/77 with cyclophosphamide (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3), with an absolute risk increase of 26% (95% CI 10% to 41%), and a relative percent increase of 66% (95% CI 20% to 129%). The number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome was 4 (95% CI 3 to 11) (moderate-certainty evidence). In the myeloablative selective HSCT study, there were similar rates of serious adverse events between groups (25/34 with HSCT and 19/37 with cyclophosphamide; RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.08; moderate-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not clearly report serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Non-myeloablative selective and myeloablative selective HSCT had moderate-certainty evidence for improvement in event-free survival, and skin thicknesscompared to cyclophosphamide. There is also low-certainty evidence that these modalities of HSCT improve physical function. However, non-myeloablative selective HSCT and myeloablative selective HSCT resulted in more serious adverse events than cyclophosphamide; highlighting the need for careful risk-benefit considerations for people considering these HSCTs. Evidence for the efficacy and adverse effects of non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT is limited at this time. Due to evidence provided from one study with high risk of bias, we have low-certainty evidence that non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT improves outcomes in skin scores, forced vital capacity, and safety. Two modalities of HSCT appeared to be a promising treatment option for SSc though there is a high risk of early treatment-related mortality and other adverse events. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness and adverse effects of non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT in the treatment of SSc. Also, more studies will be needed to determine how HSCT compares to other treatment options such as mycophenolate mofetil, as cyclophosphamide is no longer the first-line treatment for SSc. Finally, there is a need for a greater understanding of the role of HSCT for people with SSc with significant comorbidities or complications from SSc that were excluded from the trial criteria.

Positron Emission Tomography to Improve Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising technique to improve the assessment of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). This technique could be of particular value in patients with severe diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) that are possibly eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). aHSCT is a potentially effective therapy for patients with severe dcSSc and ILD, leading to stabilization or improvement of lung function. However, there is a high need to improve patient selection, which includes (1) the selection of patients with rapidly progressive ILD for early rather than last-resort aHSCT (2) the prediction of treatment response on ILD and (3) the understanding of the mechanism(s) of action of aHSCT in the lungs. As previous studies with 18F-FDG PET in SSc-ILD and other forms of ILD have demonstrated its potential value in predicting disease progression and reactivity to anti-inflammatory treatment, we discuss the potential benefit of using this technique in patients with early severe dcSSc and ILD in the context of aHSCT. In addition, we discuss the potential value of other PET tracers in the assessment of ILD and understanding the mechanisms of action of aHSCT in the lung. Finally, we provide several suggestions for future research.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation promotes connective tissue remodeling in systemic sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) treats patients with severe and progressive systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, basic mechanisms associated with the therapeutic efficacy of the procedure are not entirely understood. We aimed to evaluate how AHSCT affects skin fibrosis in SSc patients.

METHODS

Clinical data, serum, and skin samples from 39 SSc patients who underwent AHSCT were retrospectively evaluated. Skin biopsies were analyzed by immunohistochemistry with anti-MMP-1, -MMP-2, -MMP-3, -MMP-9, -TIMP-1, -α-SMA, -TGF-β, and -NF-κB p65 antibodies, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and picrosirius red to assess skin thickness and collagen density, respectively. Serum samples were evaluated by Multiplex Assay for COL1A1, COL4A1, FGF-1, MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-12, MMP-13, PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, S100A9, and TIMP-1 levels and compared to healthy controls.

RESULTS

After AHSCT, SSc patients showed clinical improvement in skin involvement, assessed by modified Rodnan's skin score (mRSS). Histologically, collagen density and skin thickness decreased after AHSCT. Immunohistochemical analyses showed increased expression of MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 after AHSCT, whereas expression of NF-κB p65 decreased. At baseline, serum levels of COL4A1 and S100A9 were higher than in healthy controls. Serum levels of S100A9 normalized after AHCST in SSc patients compared to controls. Serum levels of PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, TIMP-1, and MMP-1 decreased, while COL1A1 increased after AHSCT in SSc patients. No changes were detected in MMP-3, MMP-12, MMP-13, and FGF-1 serum levels after AHSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the therapeutic effects of AHSCT on skin fibrosis are related to changes in molecules associated with connective tissue maintenance and inflammation in SSc.

Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Interstitial Lung Disease

Autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (AHSCT) has been employed as treatment for severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) with high risk of organ failure. In the last 25 years overall survival and treatment-related mortality have improved, in accordance with a better patient selection and mobilization and conditioning protocols. This review analyzes the evidence from the last 5 years for AHSCT-treated SSc patients, considering in particular the outcomes related to interstitial lung disease. There are increasing data supporting the use of AHSCT in selected patients with rapidly progressive SSc. However, some unmet needs remain, such as an accurate patient selection, pre-transplantation analysis to identify subclinical conditions precluding the transplantation, and the alternatives for post-transplant ILD recurrence.

N-Formyl Methionine Peptide-Mediated Neutrophil Activation in Systemic Sclerosis

Exaggerated neutrophil activation and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are reported in systemic sclerosis (SSc) but its involvement in SSc pathogenesis is not clear. In the present study we assessed markers of neutrophil activation and NET formation in SSc patients in relation to markers of inflammation and disease phenotype. Factors promoting neutrophil activation in SSc remain largely unknown. Among the neutrophil activating factors, mitochondrial-derived N-formyl methionine (fMet) has been reported in several autoinflammatory conditions. The aim of the current study is to assess whether SSc patients have elevated levels of fMet and the role of fMet in neutrophil-mediated inflammation on SSc pathogenesis. Markers of neutrophil activation (calprotectin, NETs) and levels of fMet were analyzed in plasma from two SSc cohorts (n=80 and n=20, respectively) using ELISA. Neutrophil activation assays were performed in presence or absence of formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) inhibitor cyclosporin H. Elevated levels of calprotectin and NETs were observed in SSc patients as compared to healthy controls (p<0.0001) associating with SSc clinical disease characteristics. Further, SSc patients had elevated levels of circulating fMet as compared to healthy controls (p<0.0001). Consistent with a role for fMet-mediated neutrophil activation, fMet levels correlated with levels of calprotectin and NETs (r=0.34, p=0.002; r=0.29, p<0.01 respectively). Additionally, plasma samples from SSc patients with high levels of fMet induced de novo neutrophil activation through FPR1-dependent mechanisms. Our data for the first time implicates an important role for the mitochondrial component fMet in promoting neutrophil-mediated inflammation in SSc.

Life after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic Sclerosis

Stem cell transplantation has been investigated as treatment for severe and progressive systemic sclerosis (SSc) for the past 25 years. To date, more than 1000 SSc patients have been transplanted worldwide. Overall and event-free survival have increased over the years, reflecting stricter patient selection criteria and better clinical management strategies. This review addresses long-term outcomes of transplanted SSc patients, considering phase I/II and randomized clinical trials, as well as observational studies and those assessing specific aspects of the disease. Clinical outcomes are discussed comparatively between studies, highlighting advances, drawbacks and controversies in the field. Areas for future development are also discussed.

Autologous stem-cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: early action in selected patients rather than escalation therapy for all

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare rheumatic disease characterised by inflammation, vasculopathy and fibrosis of skin and internal organs. A common complication and a leading cause of death in SSc is interstitial lung disease (ILD). The current armamentarium of treatments in SSc-ILD mainly includes immunosuppressive therapies and has recently been expanded with anti-fibrotic agent nintedanib. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) is increasingly used in progressive diffuse cutaneous SSc. This intensive treatment has been studied in three randomised trials and demonstrated to improve survival and quality of life. In the subsets of patients with SSc-ILD, SCT resulted in stabilisation and modest improvement of lung volumes and disease extent on high resolution computed tomography, but less impact was seen on diffusion capacity. Comparison of SCT outcomes with results from SSc-ILD trials is difficult though, as lung involvement per se was not an inclusion criterion in all SCT trials. Also, baseline characteristics differed between studies. The risk of severe treatment-related complications from SCT is still considerable and patients with extensive lung disease are particularly at risk of complications during transplantation. Therefore SCT should only be provided by experienced multidisciplinary teams in carefully selected patients. Future research needs to include comprehensive pulmonary evaluation and establish whether SCT early in the disease might prevent irreversible pulmonary damage and reduce treatment-related complications. Also, more insight in mechanisms of action of SCT in the lung and predictors for response will improve the use of this treatment in SSc-ILD. In this review the role of SCT in the treatment of SSc-ILD is summarised.

Stem cell therapy in dermatology

Stem cells are precursor cells present in many tissues with ability to differentiate into various types of cells. This interesting property of plasticity can have therapeutic implications and there has been substantial research in this field in last few decades. As a result, stem cell therapy is now used as a therapeutic modality in many conditions, and has made its way in dermatology too. Stem cells can be classified on the basis of their source and differentiating capacity. In skin, they are present in the inter-follicular epidermis, hair follicle, dermis and adipose tissue, which help in maintaining normal skin homeostasis and repair and regeneration during injury. In view of their unique properties, they have been employed in treatment of several dermatoses including systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleromyxedema, alopecia, Merkel cell carcinoma, pemphigus vulgaris, psoriasis, wound healing, epidermolysis bullosa and even aesthetic medicine, with variable success. The advent of stem cell therapy has undoubtedly brought us closer to curative treatment of disorders previously considered untreatable. Nevertheless, there are multiple lacunae which need to be addressed including ideal patient selection, timing of intervention, appropriate conditioning regimens, post-intervention care and cost effectiveness. Further research in these aspects would help optimize the results of stem cell therapy.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Functional Outcomes of Systemic Sclerosis Patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate if autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) influences the functional status of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2018, a cohort of 27 SSc patients was assessed before, and at 6 and 12 months after AHSCT for modified Rodnan's skin score (mRSS), mouth opening, hand grip strength, range of motion (ROM), functional ability of upper limbs (DASH questionnaire and Cochin hand function scale-CHFS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire). Linear regression models with random effects and Spearman's test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

At 6 and 12 months after AHSCT, respectively, we observed significant improvement of mRSS (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01), mouth opening (p = 0.02 and p < 0.01), hand function (DASH, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01; CHFS, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01; strength, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01), physical capacity (6MWT, p = 0.02 and p = 0.03) and physical (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01) and mental (ns and p = 0.02) component scores of SF-36. At 12 months after AHSCT, ROM measurements improved (p < 0.05) in five out of six evaluated joints in both hands, compared to baseline. Correlation was significant between physical capacity and quality of life (R = 0.62; p < 0.01), between DASH and quality of life (R = -0.48; p = 0.03), and between skin involvement and wrist ROM measures (dominant hand, R = -0.65, p < 0.01; non-dominant hand, R = -0.59; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

AHSCT enhances the functional status of SSc patients in the first year of follow-up, significantly improving hand function, physical capacity and quality of life. These results are interpreted as positive outcomes of AHSCT for SSc.

Re-evaluating inclusion criteria for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in advanced systemic sclerosis: Three successful cases and review of the literature

Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease with a poor prognosis, particularly when a patient has rapidly progressive skin or pulmonary involvement. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant is an emerging treatment for this condition, that has been demonstrated to be more effective than immunosuppressants. Careful selection of patients has reduced the transplant-related mortality and maximized the likelihood of benefit. In this report, we present three cases of successful autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients who would not have met inclusion criteria for entrance into the completed hematopoietic stem cell transplant. After >18 months of follow-up, three patients had clinically significant benefit in terms of skin tightening and pulmonary function tests. Future studies of hematopoietic stem cell transplant in systemic sclerosis may aim to carefully liberalize inclusion criteria to include patients who may not have otherwise been treated while still maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): remaining challenges

Despite progress in treating internal organ involvement in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) (SSc), such as pulmonary disease, effective treatments for the hallmark of the disease, cutaneous fibrosis, remain elusive. None of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) have shown proven efficacy for SSc skin fibrosis, and there remain no FDA-approved medications, all of which are off-label, for cutaneous fibrosis in SSc. This review article will briefly summarize conventional therapies, biologics and hematopoietic stem cell transplants and select ongoing clinical trials in SSc. The gold standard for measuring skin fibrosis in SSc is the modified Rodnan skin score (MRSSS). This is a validated test that measures skin thickness (0 to 3) at 17 locations for a total score of 51. Improvements in skin score over time are used in clinical trials to quantitate skin fibrosis. Although recording the Rodnan skin score is technically straightforward, requiring no special equipment, and noninvasive, the fluctuating natural history of the disease includes improvement over time without interventions, rendering meaningful trials difficult to assess. Understanding of the basic molecular mechanisms driving pathologic fibrosis in SSc remains lacking, and underpins the often empiric nature and likely the lack of efficacy of many therapeutics that have been tried. Although repeated skin biopsies might be a more precise way to follow disease progression and regression, this is necessarily invasive and requires special tools. Here, this review will look at conventional therapies, biologics, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and catalog some of the ongoing clinical trials in SSc with a focus on cutaneous fibrosis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis: Brazilian experience

BACKGROUND

In the past 20 years, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been investigated as treatment for systemic sclerosis (SSc). The goal of HSCT is to eradicate the autoreactive immune system, which is replaced by a new immune repertoire with long-lasting regulation and tolerance to autoantigens. Here, we describe the clinical outcomes of severe and refractory SSc patients that underwent HSCT at a single Brazilian center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a longitudinal and retrospective study, including 70 adult SSc patients, with an established diagnosis of SSc, and who underwent autologous HSCT from 2009 to 2016. The procedure included harvesting and cryopreservation of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells, followed by administration of an immunoablative regimen and subsequent infusion of the previously collected cells. Patients were evaluated immediately before transplantation, at 6 months and then yearly until at least 5-years of post-transplantation follow-up. At each evaluation time point, patients underwent clinical examination, including modified Rodnan's skin score (mRSS) assessment, echocardiography, high-resolution computed tomography of the lungs and pulmonary function.

RESULTS

Median (range) age was 35.9 (19-59), with 57 (81.4%) female and median (range) non-Raynaud's disease duration of 2 (1-7) years. Before transplantation, 96% of the patients had diffuse skin involvement, 84.2%, interstitial lung disease and 67%, positive anti-topoisomerase I antibodies. Skin involvement significantly improved, with a decline in mRSS at all post-transplantation time points until at least 5-years of follow-up. When patients with pre-HSCT interstitial lung disease were analyzed, there was an improvement in pulmonary function (forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide) over the 5-year follow-up. Overall survival was 81% and progression-free survival was 70.5% at 8-years after HSCT. Three patients died due to transplant-related toxicity, 9 patients died over follow-up due to disease reactivation and one patient died due to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation improves skin and interstitial lung involvement. These results are in line with the international experience and support HSCT as a viable therapeutic alternative for patients with severe and progressive systemic sclerosis.

A review of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease. Position paper of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation

Autoimmune diseases are an important field for the development of bone marrow transplantation, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In Europe alone, almost 3000 procedures have been registered so far. The Brazilian Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation (Sociedade Brasileira de Transplantes de Medula Óssea) organized consensus meetings for the Autoimmune Diseases Group, to review the available literature on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases, aiming to gather data that support the procedure for these patients. Three autoimmune diseases for which there are evidence-based indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease. The professional stem cell transplant societies in America, Europe and Brazil (Sociedade Brasileira de Transplantes de Medula Óssea) currently consider hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a therapeutic modality for these three autoimmune diseases. This article reviews the evidence available.

Skin Histology in Systemic Sclerosis: a Relevant Clinical Biomarker

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a life-threatening autoimmune disease that causes debilitating skin fibrosis. The skin in SSc is easily accessible, and skin biopsies may provide rich biological data regarding underlying disease pathophysiology. Here, we review literature relevant to the potential for skin histology to serve as a diagnostic, pharmacokinetic/response, and predictive biomarker in SSc.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple histologic parameters correlate with SSc severity, including alpha smooth muscle actin (aSMA), CD34, collagen density, thickness, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Recent clinical trials incorporate skin histology as exploratory outcome measurements; however, a standard approach is not yet established. The possibility that skin histology may be useful as a predictive biomarker was suggested by a recent study that identified genes related to skin aSMA and CD34 staining intensity that were increased at baseline among improvers versus nonimprovers. Current literature supports skin histology as a mechanism to measure treatment response, but future work is needed to define minimally meaningful changes in key SSc skin histologic features.

Current immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapies of systemic sclerosis and emerging therapeutic strategies

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, difficult to treat disease with profound effects on quality of life and high mortality. Complex and incompletely understood pathophysiologic processes and greatly heterogeneous clinical presentations and outcomes have hampered drug development.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the currently available immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapies and discusses novel approaches for the treatment of SSc. We reviewed the literature using the MEDLINE and ClinicalTrial.gov databases between May and September 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

Available immunosuppressive and antifibrotic drugs only modestly impact the course of the disease. Most drugs are currently only investigated in the subset of patients with early diffuse cutaneous SSc. In this patient population, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is currently the only treatment that has demonstrated reversal of lung involvement, enhanced quality of life and reduced long-term mortality, but carries the risk of short-term treatment-related mortality. A great need to provide better therapeutic options to patients exists also for those patients who have limited cutaneous skin involvement. A better understanding of SSc pathophysiology has enabled the identification of numerous new therapeutic targets. The progress made in the design of clinical trials and outcome parameters will likely result in the improvement of effective management options.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis: Challenges and perspectives

Systemic Sclerosis is chronic progressive autoimmune disease, characterised by microangiopathy and fibrosis. Due to disease heterogeneity, in terms of extent, severity, and rate of progression, optimal therapeutic interventions are still lacking. Haematopoietic stem cells may be a new therapeutic option in this disease and, although the results of the first trials are encouraging, several issues remain to be addressed. On these bases, the stem cells transplantation is an area of active investigation, and an overview of the current available literature may help to define the role of this therapeutic strategy. Although the promising results, some unmet needs remain, including the transplantation protocols and their effects on immune system, the selection of the ideal patient and the pre-transplant cardiopulmonary evaluations. An improvement in these fields will allow us to optimize the haematopoietic stem cell therapies in SSc.

Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis before and after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant-a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

In severe rapidly progressive SSc, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) allows significant improvements in overall and event-free survival. We undertook this study to identify, appraise and synthesize the evidence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after AHSCT for SSc.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, in PubMed and ScienceDirect from database inception to 1 February 2019. All articles with original HRQoL data were selected.

RESULTS

The search identified 1080 articles, of which 8 were selected: 3 unblinded randomized controlled trials [American Scleroderma Stem Cell versus Immune Suppression Trial (ASSIST), Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma, Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation), 3 uncontrolled phase I or II trials and 2 cohort studies. HRQoL data from 289 SSc patients treated with AHSCT and 125 treated with intravenous CYC as a comparator with median 1.25-4.5 years follow-up were included. HRQoL was evaluated with the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI; 275 patients), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; 249 patients) and the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D; 138 patients). The quality of the studies was moderate to low. AHSCT was associated with significant improvement in the HAQ-DI (P = 0.02-<0.001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary score (P = 0.02-<0.0001) and EQ-5D index-based utility score (P < 0.001). The SF-36 Mental Component Summary score improved in the ASSIST (n = 19) and one small retrospective cohort (n = 30 patients, P = 0.005) but did not improve significantly in 2 randomized controlled trials (n = 200 patients, P = 0.1-0.91).

CONCLUSION

AHSCT in severe SSc patients is associated with significant and durable improvement in physical HRQoL.

Application of stem cell transplantation in autoimmune diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a promising therapeutic modality for severe autoimmune diseases. In this review, we will outline the immunological mechanisms and the clinical evidence and experiences for therapeutic HSCT in autoimmune diseases, with particular focus on systemic sclerosis and multiple sclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately 3000 patients with autoimmune diseases worldwide have been treated with HSCT. HSCT in systemic sclerosis has been shown in three randomized controlled trials to be associated with significant long-term event-free survival despite some transplant-related mortality in the first year. A recent controlled trial in multiple sclerosis has also show benefit with transplant.

SUMMARY

The aim of HSCT is to 'reset' one's immune system into a naïve and self-tolerant state through immune depletion and regulation. HSCT requires careful patient selection, close collaboration between physicians and expertise of transplant team to ensure optimal outcome.

Current and Future Outlook on Disease Modification and Defining Low Disease Activity in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a variable course in which the severity of the pathology dictates the disease prognosis and course. Among autoimmune rheumatic diseases, SSc has the highest mortality rate among all rheumatic diseases, though there are exciting new therapeutic targets that appear to halt the progression of SSc manifestations such as skin or lung fibrosis. In selected patients, high-intensity regimens with autologous stem cell transplantation can favorably modify the course. In what was once thought to be an untreatable disease, targeted therapies have now changed the outlook of SSc to a treatable disorder. Herein, we discuss the targeted therapies modifying the outlook on selected organ involvement and creating opportunities for future treatment. We also present a framework for defining low disease activity in SSc.

Clinical neurorestorative cell therapies: Developmental process, current state and future prospective

Clinical cell therapies (CTs) for neurological diseases and cellular damage have been explored for more than 2 decades. According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, there are 2 types of cell categories for therapy, namely stem cell-derived CT products and mature/functionally differentiated cell-derived CT products. However, regardless of the type of CT used, the majority of reports of clinical CTs from either small sample sizes based on single-center phase 1 or 2 unblinded trials or retrospective clinical studies showed effects on neurological improvement and the ability to either partially or temporarily thwart the deteriorating cellular processes of the neurodegenerative diseases. There have been only a few prospective, multicenter, randomized, double- blind placebo-control clinical trials of CTs so far in this developing novel area that have shown negative results, and more clinical trials are needed. This will expand our knowledge in exploring the type of cells that yield promising results and restore damaged neurological structure and functions of the central nervous system based on higher level evidence-based medical data. In this review, we briefly introduce the developmental process, current state, and future prospective for clinical neurorestorative CT.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic Sclerosis: Review of Current Status

Three prospective controlled clinical trials and numerous small series and case reports have confirmed that durable, drug-free remission in systemic sclerosis is possible via an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Similar results have been seen in other autoimmune diseases. The exact mechanism by which this immune "reset" was achieved in some but not all cases remains elusive, but includes major reduction of autoreactive immune competent cells, re-establishment of T- and B cell regulatory networks and normalization of tissue niche function, particularly vascular. Some aspects regarding mobilization, conditioning and graft manipulation still remain open, but clearly a significant toxicity is associated with all effective regimens at present, and therefore patient selection remains a key issue. In the hematology/oncology arena, major efforts are being made to reduce genotoxic and other collateral toxicity induced by current mobilization and conditioning protocols, which may also translate to autoimmune disease. These include developments in rapid mobilization and antibody drug conjugate conditioning technology. If effective, such low-toxicity regimens might be applied to autoimmune disease at an earlier stage before chronicity of autoimmunity has been established, thus changing the therapeutic paradigm.

Nonparametric generalized fiducial inference for survival functions under censoring

Since the introduction of fiducial inference by Fisher in the 1930s, its application has been largely confined to relatively simple, parametric problems. In this paper, we present what might be the first time fiducial inference is systematically applied to estimation of a nonparametric survival function under right censoring. We find that the resulting fiducial distribution gives rise to surprisingly good statistical procedures applicable to both one-sample and two-sample problems. In particular, we use the fiducial distribution of a survival function to construct pointwise and curvewise confidence intervals for the survival function, and propose tests based on the curvewise confidence interval. We establish a functional Bernstein–von Mises theorem, and perform thorough simulation studies in scenarios with different levels of censoring. The proposed fiducial-based confidence intervals maintain coverage in situations where asymptotic methods often have substantial coverage problems. Furthermore, the average length of the proposed confidence intervals is often shorter than the length of confidence intervals for competing methods that maintain coverage. Finally, the proposed fiducial test is more powerful than various types of log-rank tests and sup log-rank tests in some scenarios. We illustrate the proposed fiducial test by comparing chemotherapy against chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, using data from the treatment of locally unresectable gastric cancer.

Scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease: principles of management

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common cause of mortality in systemic sclerosis; accounting for approximately 35% of deaths. Although immunosuppression is currently opted as first line therapy for scleroderma-related ILD (SSc-ILD), the benefits from it remain modest with concerns for systemic toxicity from long term use. Areas covered: We review the important facets in monitoring a patient with SSc-ILD, including recognizing various patterns of ILD, identifying those at risk for disease progression and discuss the strength of evidence for immunosuppressant drugs and lung transplantation. We also discuss the potential role of anti-fibrotic agents and the existing evidence for myeloablative stem-cell transplantation. Expert commentary: Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is the most common radiologic and histopathologic pattern seen, but other forms of ILD may also be appreciated. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide are most commonly used as first line therapy for SSc-ILD; however, the efficacy of mycophenolate is comparable to cyclophosphamide with a better tolerability profile. Selected patients with SSc-ILD may be candidates for lung transplantation, although meticulous assessment for co-morbidities is crucial. Further studies are required to deduce the role of anti-fibrotic medications, biologic agents and effects of myeloablative stem cell transplantation in SSc.

CD34-selected versus unmanipulated autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of severe systemic sclerosis: a post hoc analysis of a phase I/II clinical trial conducted in Japan

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in treating severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) is established; however, the necessity of purified CD34+ cell grafts and the appropriate conditioning regimen remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CD34-selected auto-HSCT with unmanipulated auto-HSCT to treat severe SSc.

METHODS

This study was a post hoc analysis of a phase I/II clinical trial conducted in Japan. Nineteen patients with severe SSc were enrolled. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were mobilised with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m²) and filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day). Following PBSC collection by apheresis, CD34+ cells were immunologically selected in 11 patients. All patients were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) monotherapy as a conditioning regimen and received CD34-selected (n = 11) or unmanipulated auto-HSCT (n = 8). Changes in skin sclerosis and pulmonary function were assessed over an 8-year follow-up period. Differences in the changes, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were compared between patients who had received CD34-selected auto-HSCT and those who had received unmanipulated auto-HSCT.

RESULTS

Skin sclerosis progressively improved after transplantation over an 8-year follow-up period in both groups, and the improvement was significantly greater in the CD34-selected group than in the unmanipulated group. Forced vital capacity in the CD34-selected group continuously increased over 8 years, whereas in the unmanipulated group it returned to baseline 3 years after transplantation. Toxicity and viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus infection and herpes zoster, were more frequently found in the CD34-selected group than in the unmanipulated group. The frequency of severe adverse events, such as bacterial infections or organ toxicity, was similar between the two groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either treatment group. PFS of the CD34-selected group was greater than that of the unmanipulated group, and the 5-year PFS rates of the CD34-selected and unmanipulated group were 81.8% and 50% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CD34-selected auto-HSCT may produce favourable effects on improvement of skin sclerosis and pulmonary function compared with unmanipulated auto-HSCT. Use of CD34-selected auto-HSCT with high-dose cyclophosphamide monotherapy as a conditioning regimen may offer an excellent benefit-to-risk balance.

Pharmacological management of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a review of the current evidence

A proportion of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are at risk of developing a progressive-fibrosing phenotype, which is associated with a deterioration in lung function and early mortality. In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrosing ILDs that may present a progressive phenotype include idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, connective tissue disease-associated ILDs, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, ILDs related to other occupational exposures and sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive therapies are sometimes prescribed to patients with these diseases. However, this treatment regimen may not be effective, adequate on its own or well tolerated, suggesting that there is a pressing need for efficacious and better tolerated therapies. Currently, the only approved treatments to slow disease progression in patients with IPF are nintedanib and pirfenidone. Similarities in pathobiological mechanisms leading to fibrosis between IPF and other ILDs that may present a progressive-fibrosing phenotype provide a rationale to suggest that nintedanib and pirfenidone may be therapeutic options for patients with the latter diseases.

This review provides an overview of the therapeutic options currently available for patients with fibrosing ILDs, including fibrosing ILDs that may present a progressive phenotype, and explores the status of the randomised controlled trials that are underway to determine the efficacy and safety of nintedanib and pirfenidone.

Aside from IPF, there are no proven therapies for other ILDs with a progressive-fibrosing phenotype that are effective and have tolerable adverse effects. Clinical studies evaluating the benefits of antifibrotic therapy in these populations are underway.http://ow.ly/40yL30mOs0q

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease, characterized by high mortality and morbidity. The heterogeneity in terms of extent, severity, and rate of progression of skin and internal organ involvement gives rise to many difficulties in finding the optimal therapeutic interventions for SSc and, to date, no disease-modifying agents are available. In this scenario, it is not surprising that SSc was one of the first autoimmune diseases challenged with high-dose immunosuppressive treatment followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). In the last decades, AHSCT has emerged as a treatment option for refractory SSc through a reduction of the aberrant immune cells, followed by re-constitution of a new, self-tolerant immune system. After several case series and pilot studies, more recently three randomized controlled trials have shown a benefit in skin involvement, organ functions and quality of life measures in AHSCT compared to monthly cyclophosphamide. In addition, although AHSCT presents a certain risk of mortality, it has been shown that the overall survival is better, compared to the cyclophosphamide group. Current evidence suggests that SSc patients who are most likely to benefit from AHSCT are early, active, with rapidly progressing diffuse skin disease, and mild involvement of internal organs. As the studies have progressed, it has become evident the need for a more rigorous patient selection, the optimization of transplant and post-transplant procedures, and the intervention of multidisciplinary teams of specialists to increase the safety and efficacy of AHSCT in SSc.

Immunotherapy of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic systemic disease characterized by microvasculopathy, immune activation, and extensive collagen deposition. Microvasculopathy and immune activation occur very early in the disease process. Evidence from animal models and in vitro studies indicate that T-cells and B-cells activate fibroblasts to produce collagen. Traditional immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide(CyP), methotrexate(MTX), and more recently mycophenolate mofetil(MMF), may prove more effective if used very early in the disease course. These drugs showed some benefit in skin (MTX, CyP, MMF) and lung function (CyP, MMF). Biologicals, such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), belimumab(Beli), tocilizumab(TCZ), abatacept(Aba), rituximab(RTX) and fresolimumab(Fresu) appear promising as they exhibited some benefit in skin (IVIg, Beli, TCZ, Aba, RTX, Fresu), hand function (IVIg), and joints (IVIg, TCZ, Aba). Autologous stem cell transplantation showed the best therapeutic efficacy on skin and internal organs, and looks very promising, as modification of transplantation immunosuppression is decreasing the early high mortality.

Systemic Sclerosis as an Indication for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Position Statement from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Systemic sclerosis is a progressive inflammatory disease that is frequently fatal and has limited treatment options. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) has been evaluated as treatment for this disease in observational studies, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analyses. On behalf of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), a panel of experts in transplantation and rheumatology was convened to review available evidence and make a recommendation on AHCT as an indication for systemic sclerosis. Three randomized trials have compared the efficacy of AHCT with cyclophosphamide only, and all demonstrated benefit for the AHCT arm for their primary endpoint (improvement in the American Scleroderma Stem Cell versus Immune Suppression Trial, event-free survival in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma trial, and change in global rank composite score in Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation trial). AHCT recipients also had better overall survival and a lower rate of disease progression. These findings have been confirmed in subsequent meta-analyses. Based on this high-quality evidence, the ASBMT recommends systemic sclerosis should be considered as a "standard of care" indication for AHCT. Close collaboration between rheumatologists and transplant clinicians is critical for optimizing patient selection and patient outcomes. Transplant centers in the United States are strongly encouraged to report patient and outcomes data to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research on their patients receiving AHCT for this indication.

Hematopoietic stem cell therapy for autoimmune diseases - Clinical experience and mechanisms

With accumulating evidence and improved outcomes along with recognition that modern biological therapies are not universally effective, require chronic administration and have high acquisition costs, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become an emerging direction for cell therapy in autoimmune diseases (ADs). The goal of this therapy is to induce medication-free remissions by resetting the immune system into a naïve and self-tolerant state through eradication of the autoreactive immunologic memory and profound re-configuration of the immune system induced by the transplant procedure. Safety of HSCT has generally improved by implementing internal quality management and external accreditation. Inter-disciplinary guidelines for patient selection, transplant technique and supportive care along with greater center experience should optimize safe and appropriate delivery of HSCT in specific ADs. In this review, we discuss the current role and future perspectives of HSCT in AD, focusing on recent published clinical and scientific studies and recommendations in the field.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis

Three randomised controlled trials of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) demonstrated long-term survival benefits, induction of clinically meaningful, sustained improvement of forced vital capacity with improvements in skin thickening, vasculopathy and health-related quality of life, in contrast to a clinical decline in standard of care control groups. These benefits, however, must be weighed against the increased risk of transplant-related mortality. Further, with disease progression, severe extensive internal organ involvement and damage ensues, constituting an exclusion criterion for safety reasons, leaving a limited window whereby patients with SSc are eligible for HSCT. Although autologous HSCT offers the possibility of drug-free remission, relapse can occur, requiring re-initiation of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. HSCT is also associated with secondary autoimmune diseases and gonadal failure. HSCT should be proposed for carefully selected patients with early rapidly progressive diffuse SSc whose clinical picture portends a poor prognosis for survival, but yet lacks advanced organ involvement.

Diagnostic criteria, severity classification and guidelines of systemic sclerosis

Several effective drugs have been identified for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, in advanced cases, not only their effectiveness is reduced but they may be also harmful due to their side-effects. Therefore, early diagnosis and early treatment is most important for the treatment of SSc. We established diagnostic criteria for SSc in 2003 and early diagnostic criteria for SSc in 2011, for the purpose of developing evaluation of each organ in SSc. Moreover, in November 2013, the American College of Rheumatology and the European Rheumatology Association jointly developed new diagnostic criteria for increasing their sensitivity and specificity, so we revised our diagnostic criteria and severity classification of SSc. Furthermore, we have revised the clinical guideline based on the newest evidence. In particular, the clinical guideline was established by clinical questions based on evidence-based medicine according to the New Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Creation Manual (version 1.0). We aimed to make the guideline easy to use and reliable based on the newest evidence, and to present guidance as specific as possible for various clinical problems in treatment of SSc.

Efficacy and safety of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature

We aimed to assess the efficacy of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for skin sclerosis (SSc) and lung function in SSc. We performed a systematic literature review in the PubMed and Scopus databases from the earliest records to March 2016. We assessed study quality using the Cochrane tool for randomized studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for controlled cohort studies and an 18-item quality-appraisal checklist for case series. The primary outcome was the improvement of skin thickening using the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). The secondary outcome was efficacy on lung function, using diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and forced vital capacity (FVC). The safety of the procedure was evaluated. The literature search identified 431 citations. There were 38 studies involving a total of 344 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. No meta-analysis was performed due to a high heterogeneity. There was a significant improvement in mRSS in the majority of the reports (P < 0·05), and the results were sustained for up to 8 years after autologous HSCT. The randomized studies and the four cohort studies each showed a slight but statistically significant improvement in FVC at 1 or 2 years. The treatment-related mortality calculated by pooling patients of 35 studies (336 patients with a follow-up up to 146 months) was 8·3% after autologous HSCT and 1% in cyclophosphamide-treated groups. Despite heterogeneity among the studies, we determined that autologous HSCT significantly improved cutaneous fibrosis and slightly improved FVC. Safety of autologous HSCT is acceptable given the severity of the disease. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42016027951.

Chest CT texture analysis for response assessment in systemic sclerosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of CT-textural features for monitoring lung involvement in subjects with systemic sclerosis(SSc) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation(SCT) by comparison with semi-quantitative chest-CT, pulmonary function tests(PFT) and clinical parameters (modified Rodnan skin score[mRSS]).

METHODS

In a retrospective single centre analysis, we identified 23 consecutive subjects(11male) with SSc between 07/2005 and 11/2016 that underwent chest CTs before, 6 and 12 months post-SCT. Response to therapy was defined at 6 months after transplantation as stabilisation or improvement in FVC > 10% and DLCO_SB > 10%. CT-texture analysis(CTTA) including mean, entropy and uniformity were calculated.

RESULTS

PFT classified the subjects into responders(18/23;78%) and non-responders(5/23;22%). mRSS improved in responders from 28.46 ± 9.53 to 15.70 ± 10.07 6 months after auto-SCT(p = .001) whereas in non-responders no significant improvement was registered. Fibrosis score increased significantly(mean2.33 ± 1.23 vs.1.41 ± 0.78; p = .005) in non-responders after 6 and 12months. Significant lower mean intensity and entropy of skewness and higher uniformity of skewness was found in responders vs. non-responders at baseline. Significant changes in CTTA-parameters were found in both responders and non-responders at 6months and only in responders also at 12months post-SCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in CT-textural features after SCT are associated with visual CT evaluation of SSc-related lung abnormalities, but complementary provide information about therapy-induced, structural pulmonary changes.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been proposed as a therapeutic modality for severe systemic sclerosis (SSc). We set out to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of AHSCT in SSc. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing AHSCT with standard immunosuppressive therapy were included. Of 363 titles screened from multiple databases, 15 were extracted for further investigation, and 4 met inclusion criteria (3 RCTs and 1 retrospective analysis). The control arm was monthly cyclophosphamide in all the RCTs and the majority of patients in the retrospective analysis (69%). Compared with the control, AHSCT reduced all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], .5 [95% confidence interval, .33 to .75]) and improved skin thickness (modified Rodnan skin score mean difference [MD], 10.62 [95% CI, -14.21 to 7.03]), forced vital capacity (MD, 9.58 [95% CI, 3.89 to 15.18]), total lung capacity (MD, 6.36 [95% CI, 1.23 to 11.49]), and quality of life (physical 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [MD, 6.99 (95% CI, 2.79 to 11.18)]). Treatment-related mortality considerably varied between trials but was overall higher with AHSCT (RR, 9.00 [95% CI, 1.57 to 51.69]). The risk of bias for studies included in the analysis was low. Overall, AHSCT reduces the risk of all-cause mortality and has properties of a disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment in SSc. Further investigation is warranted for refining patient selection and timing of transplantation.

Myeloablative Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Severe Scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Despite current therapies, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) often has a devastating outcome. We compared myeloablative CD34+ selected autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with immunosuppression by means of 12 monthly infusions of cyclophosphamide in patients with scleroderma.

METHODS

We randomly assigned adults (18 to 69 years of age) with severe scleroderma to undergo myeloablative autologous stem-cell transplantation (36 participants) or to receive cyclophosphamide (39 participants). The primary end point was a global rank composite score comparing participants with each other on the basis of a hierarchy of disease features assessed at 54 months: death, event-free survival (survival without respiratory, renal, or cardiac failure), forced vital capacity, the score on the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the modified Rodnan skin score.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat population, global rank composite scores at 54 months showed the superiority of transplantation (67% of 1404 pairwise comparisons favored transplantation and 33% favored cyclophosphamide, P=0.01). In the per-protocol population (participants who received a transplant or completed ≥9 doses of cyclophosphamide), the rate of event-free survival at 54 months was 79% in the transplantation group and 50% in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.02). At 72 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival (74% vs. 47%) and overall survival (86% vs. 51%) also favored transplantation (P=0.03 and 0.02, respectively). A total of 9% of the participants in the transplantation group had initiated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) by 54 months, as compared with 44% of those in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.001). Treatment-related mortality in the transplantation group was 3% at 54 months and 6% at 72 months, as compared with 0% in the cyclophosphamide group.

CONCLUSIONS

Myeloablative autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation achieved long-term benefits in patients with scleroderma, including improved event-free and overall survival, at a cost of increased expected toxicity. Rates of treatment-related death and post-transplantation use of DMARDs were lower than those in previous reports of nonmyeloablative transplantation. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114530 .).