A novel deletion mutation is recurrent in von Willebrand disease types 1 and 3

Characterization of copy-number variants in a large cohort of patients with von Willebrand disease reveals a relationship between disrupted regions and disease type

Background

Genetic analysis for von Willebrand disease (VWD) commonly utilizes DNA sequencing to identify variants in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene; however, this technique cannot always detect copy-number variants (CNVs). Additional mapping of CNVs in patients with VWD is needed.

Objectives

This study aimed to characterize CNVs in a large sample of VWF mutation-negative VWD patients.

Methods

To determine the role of CNVs in VWD, a VWF high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization array was custom-designed to avoid multiple sequence variations, repeated sequences, and the VWF pseudogene. This was performed on 204 mutation-negative subjects for whom clinical variables were also available.

Results

Among the 204 patients, 7 unique CNVs were found, with a total of 24 CNVs (12%). Of the 7 unique CNVs, 1 was novel, 1 was found in a VWF database, and 5 were previously reported. All patients with type 1C VWD and a CNV had the same exon 33 and 34 in-frame deletion. Certain clinical variables were also significantly different between those with and without CNVs.

Conclusion

The in-frame deletion in patients with type 1C VWD exactly matches the D4N module of the D4 domain, a region where mutations and deletions are known to affect clearance. We observed significantly higher VWF-to-ristocetin cofactor levels in patients with type 1C VWD and a CNV than in patients without a CNV, suggesting a relationship between CNVs and the increased clearance observed in patients with type 1C VWD. Glycoprotein IbM activity was significantly lower in patients with type 1 VWD and a CNV than in patients without a CNV, suggesting that platelet binding is more affected by CNVs than single base pair mutations. This work elucidates some of the underlying genetic mechanisms of CNVs in these patients.

Type 1 von Willebrand Disease in a Pediatric Patient Caused by a Novel Heterozygous Deletion of Exons 1 to 6 of the von Willebrand Factor Gene: A Case Report

A 6-year-old boy was referred to a hematologist due to excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Diagnostic assessment for von Willebrand disease (VWD) was indicated and included both coagulation and genetic testing. Laboratory testing revealed proportionally decreased von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein Ib-binding activity (23.6%) compared to VWF antigen (24.7%), similarly decreased VWF collagen-binding activity (24.2%), and normally distributed VWF multimers, with decreased intensity of all fractions. Diagnosis of type 1 VWD was established. Genetic analysis by means of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of VWF and coagulation factor VIII genes did not identify any causative mutations. Additionally, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of VWF gene exons revealed a heterozygous deletion of exons 1 to 6, which is reported in type 1 VWD for the first time. Application of MLPA was crucial for revealing the genetic basis of type 1 VWD in this case, which would have remained undetected if only NGS was used.

von Willebrand factor propeptide variants lead to impaired storage and ER retention in patient-derived endothelial colony-forming cells

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is synthesized by vascular endothelial cells and megakaryocytes. The VWF propeptide is critical for multimerization and acts as an intra-molecular chaperone for mature VWF in sorting to its storage organelles, Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs). In the Canadian Type 3 VWD study, almost half of the identified variants were in the VWF propeptide and these were associated with an increased bleeding phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate VWF propeptide variants that cause quantitative von Willebrand disease (VWD) by utilizing patient-derived endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs).

PATIENTS/METHODS

Endothelial colony-forming cells were isolated from five Type 3 VWD patients from four families with the following variants: (1) homozygous p.Asp75_Gly178del (deletion of exons 4 and 5 deletion; Ex4-5del), (2) homozygous p.Cys633Arg, (3) homozygous p.Arg273Trp, and (4) p.Pro293Glnfs*164 and p.Gln419* inherited in the compound heterozygous state. Additionally, ECFCs were isolated from six family members (two Type 1 VWD, four unaffected).

RESULTS

Endothelial colony-forming cells from the Type 3 patient with the compound heterozygous genotype exhibited a true null VWF cellular phenotype, with negligible VWF detected. In contrast, the other three propeptide variants presented a similar expression pattern in homozygous ECFCs where VWF was synthesized but not packaged in WPBs, and variant VWF had an increased association with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker, protein disulfide-isomerase (PDI), indicating an ER-retention phenotype. The biosynthetic phenotype was similar but to a lesser degree in heterozygous ECFCs expressing the non-null variants.

CONCLUSION

This study further elucidates the importance of the VWF propeptide in the VWD phenotype using patient-derived cells.

Molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity in type 3 VWD families in U.S. Zimmerman program

BACKGROUND

Type 3 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is a rare and severe form of VWD characterized by the absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF).

OBJECTIVES

As part of the Zimmerman Program, we sought to explore the molecular pathogenesis, correlate bleeding phenotype and severity, and determine the inheritance pattern found in type 3 VWD families.

PATIENTS/METHODS

62 index cases with a pre-existing diagnosis of type 3 VWD were analyzed. Central testing included FVIII, VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWFpp. Bleeding symptoms were quantified using the ISTH bleeding score. Genetic analysis included VWF sequencing, comparative genomic hybridization and predictive computational programs.

RESULTS

75% of subjects (46) had central testing confirming type 3, while 25% were re-classified as type 1-Severe or type 1C. Candidate VWF variants were found in all subjects with 93% of expected alleles identified. The majority were null alleles including frameshift, nonsense, splice site, and large deletions, while 13% were missense variants. Additional studies on 119 family members, including 69 obligate carriers, revealed a wide range of heterogeneity in VWF levels and bleeding scores, even amongst those with the same variant. Co-dominant inheritance was present in 51% of families and recessive in 21%, however 28% were ambiguous.

CONCLUSION

This report represents a large cohort of VWD families in the U.S. with extensive phenotypic and genotypic data. While co-dominant inheritance was seen in approximately 50% of families, this study highlights the complexity of VWF genetics due to the heterogeneity found in both VWF levels and bleeding tendencies amongst families with type 3 VWD.

Identification of von Willebrand factor D4 domain mutations in patients of Afro-Caribbean descent: In vitro characterization

Background

Von Willebrand disease was diagnosed in two Afro‐Caribbean patients and sequencing of the VWF gene (VWF) revealed the presence of multiple variants located throughout the gene, including variants located in the D4 domain of VWF: p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5) in one patient and p.(Cys2216Phefs*9) in the other patient. Interestingly, D4 variants have not been studied often.

Objectives

Our goal was to characterize how the D4 variants p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5) and p.(Cys2216Phefs*9) influenced VWF biosynthesis/secretion and functions using in vitro assays.

Methods

Recombinant VWF (rVWF), mutant or wild‐type, was produced via transient transfection of the human embryonic kidney cell line 293T. The use of different tags for the wild‐type and the mutant allele allowed us to distinguish between the two forms when measuring VWF antigen in medium and cell lysates. Binding of rVWF to its ligands, collagen, factor VIII, ADAMTS13, and platelet receptors was also investigated.

Results

Homozygous expression of the p.(Cys2216Phefs*9)‐rVWF mutation resulted in an almost complete intracellular retention of the protein. Heterozygous expression led to secretion of almost exclusively wild‐type‐rVWF, logically capable of normal interaction with the different ligands. In contrast, the p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5)‐rVWF exhibited reduced binding to type III collagen and αIIbβ3 integrin compared to wild‐type‐rVWF.

Conclusions

We report two mutations of the D4 domains that induced combined qualitative and quantitative defects.

Characterization of large in-frame von Willebrand factor deletions highlights differing pathogenic mechanisms

Copy number variation (CNV) is known to cause all von Willebrand disease (VWD) types, although the associated pathogenic mechanisms involved have not been extensively studied. Notably, in-frame CNV provides a unique opportunity to investigate how specific von Willebrand factor (VWF) domains influence the processing and packaging of the protein. Using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, this study determined the extent to which CNV contributed to VWD in the Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease cohort, highlighting in-frame deletions of exons 3, 4-5, 32-34, and 33-34. Heterozygous in vitro recombinant VWF expression demonstrated that, although deletion of exons 3, 32-34, and 33-34 all resulted in significant reductions in total VWF (P < .0001, P < .001, and P < .01, respectively), only deletion of exons 3 and 32-34 had a significant impact on VWF secretion (P < .0001). High-resolution microscopy of heterozygous and homozygous deletions confirmed these observations, indicating that deletion of exons 3 and 32-34 severely impaired pseudo-Weibel-Palade body (WPB) formation, whereas deletion of exons 33-34 did not, with this variant still exhibiting pseudo-WPB formation similar to wild-type VWF. In-frame deletions in VWD, therefore, contribute to pathogenesis via moderate or severe defects in VWF biosynthesis and secretion.

Updated overview on von Willebrand disease: focus on the interest of genotyping

Introduction: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, characterized by a quantitative or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a multimeric glycoprotein crucial for primary hemostasis and coagulation. VWD pathophysiology is heterogeneous as it includes several types and subtypes which therapeutic management is different. The mainstays of VWD treatment are desmopressin and replacement therapy based on both plasma-derived concentrates and a recently developed recombinant VWF. VWD definitive diagnosis is achieved by a battery of phenotypic biologic assays and genotyping is currently performed mostly for research.Areas covered: This narrative review will firstly present a general overview on VWD epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, clinics, phenotypic biologic diagnosis, and treatment. Secondly, a focus on VWD genotyping will be presented with specific emphasis on the evolution of its technical aspects, its applications for research dedicated to a better understanding of VWD pathophysiology and epidemiology and its interest in both a faster diagnosis and an optimal treatment of VWD.Expert opinion: Based on analysis of the literature, it can be concluded that the fast evolution of genetic techniques together with the development of innovating treatments may significantly change diagnostic flow charts for VWD and their use for specific and personalized treatment.

Characterization of a Porcine Model for Von Willebrand Disease Type 1 and 3 Regarding Expression of Angiogenic Mediators in the Nonpregnant Female Reproductive Tract

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), a blood coagulation disorder, is also known to cause angiodysplasia. Hitherto, no animal model has been found with angiodysplasia that can be studied in vivo. In addition, VWD patients tend to have a higher incidence of miscarriages for reasons unknown. Thus, we aimed to examine the influence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) on the female reproductive tract histology and the expression and distribution of angiogenic factors in a porcine model for VWD types 1 and 3. The disease-causing tandem duplication within the VWF gene occurred naturally in these pigs, making them a rare and valuable model. Reproductive organs of 6 animals (2 of each mutant genotype and 2 wildtype (WT) animals) were harvested. Genotype plus phenotype were confirmed. Several angiogenic factors were chosen for possible connections to VWF and analyzed alongside VWF by immunohistochemistry and quantitative gene expression studies. VWD type 3 animals showed angiodysplasia in the uterus and shifting of integrin α_Vβ₃ from the apical membrane of uterine epithelium to the cytoplasm accompanied by increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. Varying staining patterns for angiopoietin (Ang)-2 were observed among the genotypes. As compared with WT, the ovaries of the VWD type 3 animals showed decreased gene expression of ANG2 and increased gene expression of TIE (tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor homology domains) 2, with some differences in the ANG/TIE-system among the mutant genotypes. In conclusion, severely reduced VWF seems to evoke angiodysplasia in the porcine uterus. Varying distribution and expression of angiogenic factors suggest that this large animal model is promising for investigation of influence of VWF on angiogenesis in larger groups.

The role of genetics in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of type 1 Von Willebrand disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, but diagnosis of VWD is challenging, particularly with type 1 VWD. Although most clinicians use specific tests of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity to classify patients with VWD, genetic testing for VWF defects is another potential method of diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies of patients with type 1 VWD report consistently that many, but not all, study participants have VWF gene defects. Certain populations, including those with VWF levels less than 30 IU/dl and those with clearance defects, are more likely to have a VWF sequence variant. In addition, a number of loci outside the VWF gene have been shown to affect VWF levels, including ABO, CLEC4M, STXBP5, and STAB2.

SUMMARY

Genetic defects in VWF are common, but not all defects lead to disease. Type 1 VWD in particular does not always have an associated VWF sequence variant. New data stemming from genome-wide association studies on modifier genes suggest that the etiology of type 1 VWD is multifactorial.

Genetics of Hypercoagulable and Hypocoagulable States

Hemostasis is the normal process of blood coagulation in vivo to stop pathologic bleeding. Virchow triad includes venous stasis, hypercoagulability, and vascular injury. Natural anticoagulants include protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Factor V Leiden is the most common inherited thrombophilia, followed by prothrombin gene mutation. All inherited thrombophilias are passed down in an autosomal dominant fashion. Patients harboring the antiphospholipid antibodies have an increased risk for thrombosis. von Willebrand disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder; the pattern of inheritance is autosomal. Hemophilia A and B are the only hereditary bleeding disorders inherited in a sex-linked recessive pattern.

Common VWF sequence variants associated with higher VWF and FVIII are less frequent in subjects diagnosed with type 1 VWD

BACKGROUND

Genetic variation in the VWF gene is associated with von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) levels in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that VWF sequence variants associated with higher VWF or FVIII could impact the diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD).

METHODS

We examined VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), VWF propeptide (VWFpp), and FVIII levels along with VWF gene sequencing in 256 healthy control and 97 type 1 VWD subjects as part of a cross-sectional study.

RESULTS

We found several VWF sequence variants (VWF c.2880G>A and VWF c.2365A>G(;)c.2385T>C, found in linkage disequilibrium) associated with higher VWF and FVIII levels in healthy controls (P < .001 for both variants). In addition, these variants were significantly more common in controls than in subjects diagnosed with type 1 VWD and VWF:Ag <30 (P < .005). The decreased variant frequencies in type 1 VWD was not seen in other VWD types. VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII were not statistically different in type 1 VWD subjects who had these VWF variants compared to type 1 VWD patients without them. There was no difference in ABO blood group, VWF propeptide levels (excluding subjects with known VWF clearance defects), or bleeding score using the ISTH bleeding assessment tool.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that certain VWF sequence variants associated with elevated FVIII and VWF levels may protect against reduced VWF levels. These findings were independent of other pathogenic sequence variants in VWF, suggesting a possible independent effect of c.2880G>A and c.2365A>G(;)c.2385T>C on VWF levels.

Diagnosis of inherited bleeding disorders in the genomic era

Inherited bleeding disorders affect between 1 in 1000 individuals for the most common disorder, von Willebrand Disease, to only 8 reported cases worldwide of alpha-2-antiplasmin deficiency. Those with an identifiable abnormality can be divided into disorders of coagulation factors (87%), platelet count and function (8%) and the fibrinolytic system (3%). Of the patients registered in the UK with a bleeding disorder, the remaining 2% are unclassifiable. In addition to bleeding symptoms, patients with an inherited bleeding disorder can manifest other abnormalities, making an accurate and complete diagnosis that reflects the underlying molecular pathology important. Although some inherited bleeding disorders can still be easily diagnosed through a combination of careful clinical assessment and laboratory assays of varying degrees of complexity, there are many where conventional approaches are inadequate. Improvements in phenotyping assays have enhanced our diagnostic armoury but genotyping now offers the most accurate and complete diagnosis for some of these conditions. The advent of next generation sequencing technology has meant that many genes can now be analysed routinely in clinical practice. Here, we discuss the different diagnostic tools currently available for inherited bleeding disorders and suggest that genotyping should be incorporated at an early stage in the diagnostic pathway.

A Laboratory Phenotype/Genotype Correlation of 1167 French Patients From 670 Families With von Willebrand Disease: A New Epidemiologic Picture

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a genetic bleeding disease due to a defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a glycoprotein crucial for platelet adhesion to the subendothelium after vascular injury. VWD include quantitative defects of VWF, either partial (type 1 with VWF levels <50 IU/dL) or virtually total (type 3 with undetectable VWF levels) and also qualitative defects of VWF (type 2 variants with discrepant antigenic and functional VWF levels). The most bleeding forms of VWD usually do not concern type 1 patients with the mildest VWF defects (VWF levels between 30 and 50 IU/dL). The French reference center for VWD performed a laboratory phenotypic and genotypic analysis in 1167 VWD patients (670 families) selected by their basic biologic phenotype: type 3, type 2, and type 1 with VWF levels <30 IU/dL. In these patients indeed, to achieve an accurate diagnosis of VWD type and subtype is crucial for the management (treatment and genetic counseling). A phenotype/genotype correlation was present in 99.3% of cases; 323 distinct VWF sequence variations (58% of novel) were identified (missense 67% versus truncating 33%). The distribution of VWD types was: 25% of type 1, 8% of type 3, 66% of type 2 (2A: 18%, 2B: 17%, 2M: 19%, 2N: 12%), and 1% of undetermined type. Type 1 VWD was related either to a defective synthesis/secretion or to an accelerated clearance of VWF. In type 3 VWD, bi-allelic mutations of VWF were found in almost all patients. In type 2A, the most frequent mechanism was a hyper-proteolysis of VWF. Type 2B showed 85% of patients with deleterious mutations (distinct from type 2B New York). Type 2M was linked to a defective binding of VWF to platelet glycoprotein Ib or to collagen. Type 2N VWD included almost half type 2N/3. This biologic study emphasizes the complex mechanisms for both quantitative and qualitative VWF defects in VWD. In addition, this study provides a new epidemiologic picture of the most bleeding forms of VWD in which qualitative defects are predominant.

New insights into genotype and phenotype of VWD

Recent advances in VWD research have improved our understanding of the genotype and phenotype of VWD. The VWF gene is highly polymorphic, with a large number of sequence variations reported in healthy individuals. This can lead to some difficulty when attempting to discern genotype-phenotype correlations because sequence variations may not represent disease. In type 1 VWD, mutations can be found throughout the VWF gene, but likely pathogenic sequence variations are found in only ∼2/3 of type 1 VWD patients. Sequence variations in type 2 VWD are located in the region corresponding to the defect in the VWF protein found in each type 2 variant. In type 3 VWD, sequence variations are not confined to a specific region of the VWF gene and also include large deletions that may not be picked up using conventional sequencing techniques. Use of genetic testing may be most helpful in diagnosis of type 2 VWD, in which a larger number of known, well characterized mutations are present and demonstration of one of these may help to confirm the diagnosis. Bleeding symptoms in general are more severe with decreasing VWF levels and more severe in type 2 and type 3 VWD compared with type 1 VWD. Prediction of phenotype for an individual patient, however, is still difficult, and the addition of genetic data will be most helpful in ascertaining the correct diagnosis for VWD patients.

New insights into genotype and phenotype of VWD

Recent advances in VWD research have improved our understanding of the genotype and phenotype of VWD. The VWF gene is highly polymorphic, with a large number of sequence variations reported in healthy individuals. This can lead to some difficulty when attempting to discern genotype–phenotype correlations because sequence variations may not represent disease. In type 1 VWD, mutations can be found throughout the VWF gene, but likely pathogenic sequence variations are found in only ∼2/3 of type 1 VWD patients. Sequence variations in type 2 VWD are located in the region corresponding to the defect in the VWF protein found in each type 2 variant. In type 3 VWD, sequence variations are not confined to a specific region of the VWF gene and also include large deletions that may not be picked up using conventional sequencing techniques. Use of genetic testing may be most helpful in diagnosis of type 2 VWD, in which a larger number of known, well characterized mutations are present and demonstration of one of these may help to confirm the diagnosis. Bleeding symptoms in general are more severe with decreasing VWF levels and more severe in type 2 and type 3 VWD compared with type 1 VWD. Prediction of phenotype for an individual patient, however, is still difficult, and the addition of genetic data will be most helpful in ascertaining the correct diagnosis for VWD patients.

Perils, problems, and progress in laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) merits consideration of personal and family history of bleeding symptoms along with confirmatory laboratory testing. As the latter yields quantifiable results, overreliance on a laboratory diagnosis may occur. However, existing tests for VWD contain potential sources for error. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting these assays can contribute to either falsely normal or falsely abnormal results. This article will discuss the present available assays as well as new developments in diagnostic testing. A clear understanding of the limitations of VWD testing is helpful for ensuring the correct diagnosis of affected patients.

The genetics of Canadian type 3 von Willebrand disease: further evidence for co-dominant inheritance of mutant alleles

BACKGROUND

Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most severe form of the disease and is classically inherited in an autosomal recessive fashion.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to investigate the molecular pathogenesis of a Canadian cohort of type 3 VWD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four families comprised of 100 individuals were investigated. Phenotypic data, including bleeding scores (BS), von Willebrand factor (VWF) laboratory values and anti-VWF inhibitor status were included as well as sequence analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 31 different mutations (20 novel): 8 frameshift, 5 splice site, 9 nonsense, 1 gene conversion, 6 missense and 2 partial gene deletion mutations. The majority of mutations identified were in the propeptide (42%); index cases (IC) with these mutations exhibited more severe bleeding (BS = 22) than those with mutations elsewhere in VWF (BS = 13). Sixty-two out of 68 (91%) mutant alleles were identified. Twenty-nine IC (85%) had a VWF null genotype identified; 17 homozygous, 12 compound heterozygous. In five IC (15%), two mutant VWF alleles were not identified to explain the type 3 VWD phenotype. In four ICs only one mutant VWF allele was identified and in one IC no mutant VWF alleles were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

We have investigated the molecular pathogenesis of a Canadian cohort of type 3 VWD patients. Obligate carriers are not phenotypically silent in the Canadian population; 48% have been diagnosed with type 1 VWD. In approximately 50% of families in this study the inheritance pattern for type 3 VWD is co-dominant and not recessive.

The molecular characterization of von Willebrand disease: good in parts

Since the cloning of the gene that encodes von Willebrand factor (VWF), 27 years ago, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular basis of the most common inherited bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease (VWD). The molecular pathology of this condition represents a range of genetic mechanisms, some of which are now very well characterized, and others that are still under investigation. In general, our knowledge of the molecular basis of type 2 and 3 VWD is now well advanced, and in some instances this information is being used to enhance clinical management. In contrast, our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of the most common form of VWD, type 1 disease, is still at an early stage, with preliminary evidence that this phenotype involves a complex interplay between environmental factors and the influence of genetic variability both within and outside of the VWF locus.

Cellular and molecular basis of von Willebrand disease: studies on blood outgrowth endothelial cells

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a heterogeneous bleeding disorder caused by decrease or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (VWF). A wide range of mutations in the VWF gene have been characterized; however, their cellular consequences are still poorly understood. Here we have used a recently developed approach to study the molecular and cellular basis of VWD. We isolated blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs) from peripheral blood of 4 type 1 VWD and 4 type 2 VWD patients and 9 healthy controls. We confirmed the endothelial lineage of BOECs, then measured VWF messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels (before and after stimulation) and VWF multimers. Decreased mRNA levels were predictive of plasma VWF levels in type 1 VWD, confirming a defect in VWF synthesis. However, BOECs from this group of patients also showed defects in processing, storage, and/or secretion of VWF. Levels of VWF mRNA and protein were normal in BOECs from 3 type 2 VWD patients, supporting the dysfunctional VWF model. However, 1 type 2M patient showed decreased VWF synthesis and storage, indicating a complex cellular defect. These results demonstrate for the first time that isolation of endothelial cells from VWD patients provides novel insight into cellular mechanisms of the disease.

The molecular genetics of von Willebrand disease

Quantitative and/or qualitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (vWF) is associated with the most common inherited bleeding disease von Willebrand disease (vWD). vWD is a complex disease with clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Incomplete penetrance and variable expression due to genetic and environmental factors contribute to its complexity. vWD also has a complex molecular pathogenesis. Some vWF gene mutations are associated with the affected vWF biosynthesis and multimerization, whereas others are associated with increased clearance and functional impairment. Moreover, in addition to a particular mutation, type O blood may result in the more severe phenotype. The present review aimed to provide a summary of the current literature on the molecular genetics of vWD.

Conflict of interest:None declared.

von Willebrand disease: clinical and laboratory lessons learned from the large von Willebrand disease studies

During the past 25 years, our knowledge concerning the pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, and treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) has increased significantly. Following the immunological differentiation of factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the 1970s and the cloning of the FVIII and VWF genes in the mid-1980s, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of this, the most common inherited bleeding disorder. We now recognize that VWD represents a range of genetic diseases all with the clinical endpoint of increased mucocutaneous bleeding. The molecular pathology of Type 2 and 3 VWD is now comprehensively documented and involves rare sequence variants at the VWF locus. In contrast, the genetic causation of Type 1 disease remains incompletely defined and in many cases appears to involve genetic determinants in addition to or instead of VWF. The diagnostic triad of a personal history of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding, laboratory tests for VWF that are consistent with VWD, and a family history of the condition remain the keystone to VWD identification. In the laboratory, measurement of VWF antigen and function continue to be the most important diagnostic studies, and while our understanding of the molecular genetic pathology of VWD has advanced considerably in the past decade, genetic testing as a component of diagnosis is limited to certain distinct subtypes of the disorder. Treatment of VWD has been relatively unchanged for the past decade and continues to involve either stimulation of the release of intrinsic VWF with desmopressin or the infusion of VWF concentrates.

von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease is a common inherited bleeding disorder characterized by excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Characteristic bleeding symptoms include epistaxis, easy bruising, oral cavity bleeding, menorrhagia, bleeding after dental extraction, surgery, and/or childbirth, and in severe cases, bleeding into joints and soft tissues. There are three subtypes: types 1 and 3 represent quantitative variants and type 2 is a group of four qualitative variants: (1) type 2A-characterized by defective von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet adhesion because of decreased high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor multimers, (2) type 2B-caused by pathologically increased von Willebrand factor-platelet interactions, (3) type 2M-caused by decreased von Willebrand factor-platelet interactions not based on the loss of high-molecular-weight multimers, and (4) type 2N-characterized by reduced binding of von Willebrand factor to factor VIII. The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease requires specialized assays of von Willebrand factor and/or molecular genetic testing of von Willebrand factor. Severe bleeding episodes can be prevented or controlled with intravenous infusions of virally inactivated plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates containing both von Willebrand factor and factor VIII. Depending on the von Willebrand disease type, mild bleeding episodes usually respond to intravenous or subcutaneous treatment with desmopressin, a vasopressin analog. Other treatments that can reduce symptoms include fibrinolytic inhibitors and hormones for menorrhagia.

Common large partial VWF gene deletion does not cause alloantibody formation in the Hungarian type 3 von Willebrand disease population

BACKGROUND

Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an autosomal recessive bleeding disorder, characterized by virtually undetectable plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) and consequently reduced plasma factor VIII levels. Genetic mutations responsible for type 3 VWD are very heterogeneous, scattered throughout the VWF gene and show high variability among different populations.

METHODS

Twenty-five severe VWD patients were studied by direct sequencing of the 51 coding exons of the VWF gene. The total number of VWD type 3 families in Hungary is 24, of which 23 were investigated.

RESULTS

Fifteen novel mutations were identified in 31 alleles, five being nonsense mutations (p.Q1238X, p.Q1898X, p.Q1931X, p.S2505X and p.S2568X), four small deletions and insertions resulting in frame shifts (c.1992insC, c.3622delT, c.5315insGA and c.7333delG), one a large partial deletion (delExon1-3) of the 5'-region, four candidate missense mutations (p.C35R, p.R81G, p.C295S, p.C623T) and one a candidate splice site mutation (c.1730-10C>A). Six previously described mutations were detected in 17 alleles, including the repeatedly found c.2435delC, p.R1659X and p.R1853X. Only one patient developed alloantibodies to VWF, carrying a homozygous c.3622delT.

CONCLUSION

We report the genetic background of the entire Hungarian type 3 VWD population. A large novel deletion, most probably due to a founder effect, seems to be unique to Hungarian type 3 VWD patients with high allele frequency. In contrast to previous reports, none of the five patients homozygous for the large partial deletion developed inhibitors to VWF. This discrepancy raises the possibility of selection bias in some of the reports.

The genetic basis of von Willebrand disease

The common autosomally inherited mucocutaneous bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease (VWD) results from quantitative or qualitative defects in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF). Mutation can affect VWF quantity or its functions mediating platelet adhesion and aggregation at sites of vascular damage and carrying pro-coagulant factor VIII (FVIII). Phenotype and genotype analysis in patients with the three VWD types has aided understanding of VWF structure and function. Investigation of patients with specific disease types has identified mutations in up to 70% of type 1 and 100% of type 3 VWD cases. Missense mutations predominate in type 1 VWD and act through mechanisms including rapid clearance and intracellular retention. Many mutations are incompletely penetrant and attributing pathogenicity is challenging. Other factors including blood group O contribute to low VWF level. Missense mutations affecting platelet- or FVIII-binding through a number of mechanisms are responsible for the four type 2 subtypes; 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N. In contrast, mutations resulting in a lack of VWF expression predominate in recessive type 3 VWD. This review explores the genetic basis of each VWD type, relating mutations identified to disease mechanism. Additionally, utility of genetic analysis within the different disease types is explored.

When 1 plus 1 equals 3 in VWD

In this issue of Blood, Sutherland and colleagues describe an unusual in-frame deletion of exons 4-5 of the VWF gene associated with both dominantly inherited type 1 and with type 3 VWD.1