A validated pediatric disease risk index for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

A Need for a Novel Survival Risk Scoring System for Intensive Care Admissions Due to Sepsis in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients

Background: Children with hemato-oncological diseases or following stem cell transplantation (SCT) are at high risk for life-threatening infections; sepsis in this population constitutes a substantial proportion of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions. The current pediatric prognostic scoring tools to evaluate illness severity and mortality risk are designed for the general pediatric population and may not be adequate for this vulnerable subpopulation. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on all PICU admissions for sepsis in children with hemato-oncological diseases or post-SCT, in a single tertiary pediatric hospital between 2008 and 2021 (n = 233). We collected and analyzed demographic, clinical, and laboratory data and outcomes for all patients, and evaluated the accuracy of two major prognostic scoring tools, the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) and the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III). Furthermore, we created a new risk-assessment model that contains additional parameters uniquely relevant to this population. Results: The survival rate for the cohort was 83%. The predictive accuracies of PELOD-2 and PRISM III, as determined by the area under the curve (AUC), were 83% and 78%, respectively. Nine new parameters were identified as clinically significant: age, SCT, viral infection, fungal infection, central venous line removal, vasoactive inotropic score, bilirubin level, C-reactive protein level, and prolonged neutropenia. Unique scoring systems were established by the integration of these new parameters into the algorithm; the new systems significantly improved their predictive accuracy to 91% (p = 0.01) and 89% (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: The predictive accuracies (AUC) of the PELOD-2 and PRISM III scores are limited in children with hemato-oncological diseases admitted to PICU with sepsis. These results highlight the need to develop a risk-assessment tool adjusted to this special population. Such new scoring should represent their unique characteristics including their degree of immunosuppression and be validated in a large multi-center prospective study.

Diagnosing and Grading of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant of Children, Adolescent and Young Adults treated in a Pediatric Institution with Pediatric Protocols

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS), or veno-occlusive disease, of the liver has been recognized as a complex, life-threatening complication in the posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) setting. The diagnostic criteria for SOS have evolved over the last several decades with a greater understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, with 2 recent diagnostic criteria introduced in 2018 (European Society of Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] criteria) and 2020 (Cairo criteria). We sought out to evaluate the performance characteristics in diagnosing and grading SOS in pediatric patients of the 4 different diagnostic criteria (Baltimore, Modified Seattle, EBMT, and Cairo) and severity grading systems (defined by the EBMT and Cairo criteria). Retrospective chart review of children, adolescent, and young adults who underwent conditioned autologous and allogeneic HSCT between 2017 and 2021 at a single pediatric institution. A total of 250 consecutive patients underwent at least 1 HSCT at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco for a total of 307 HSCT. The day 100 cumulative incidence of SOS was 12.1%, 21.1%, 28.4%, and 28.4% per the Baltimore, Modified Seattle, EBMT, and Cairo criteria, respectively (P < .001). We found that patients diagnosed with grade ≥4 SOS per the Cairo criteria were more likely to be admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (92% versus 58%, P = .035) and intubated (85% versus 32%, P = .002) than those diagnosed with grade ≥4 per EBMT criteria. Age <3 years-old (HR 1.76, 95% [1.04 to 2.98], P = .036), an abnormal body mass index (HR 1.69, 95% [1.06 to 2.68], P = .027), and high-risk patients per our institutional guidelines (HR 1.68, 95% [1.02 to 2.76], P = .041) were significantly associated with SOS per the Cairo criteria. We demonstrate that age <3 years, abnormal body mass index, and other high-risk criteria associate strongly with subsequent SOS development. Patients with moderate to severe SOS based on Cairo severity grading system may correlate better with clinical course based on ICU admissions and intubations when compared to the EBMT severity grading system.

An artificial intelligence-driven predictive model for pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using clinical variables

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a procedure with high morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients for maximum benefit and risk assessment is crucial in the decision-making process. This has led to the development of predictive risk models for HSCT in adults, which have limitations when applied to pediatric population. Our goal was to develop an automatic learning algorithm to predict survival in children with malignant disorders undergoing HSCT.

METHODS

We studied allogenic HSCTs performed on children with malignant disorders at a third-level hospital between 1991 and 2021. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test for the univariate analysis, and Cox regression for the multivariate analysis. A prognostic index was constructed based on these findings. Lastly, we constructed a predictive model using a random forest algorithm to forecast 1-year survival after HSCT.

RESULTS

We analyzed 229 HSCTs in 201 patients with a median follow-up of 1.64 years. Variables that impacted on the multivariate analysis were older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.76, p = .003), oldest period of HSCT (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73, p < .001), and mismatched donor (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.51-4.65, p = .001). Our prognostic index was associated with 3-year overall survival (OS; p < .001). A random forest was developed using as variables: diagnosis, age, year of HSCT, time from diagnosis to HSCT, disease stage, donor type, and conditioning. This achieved 72% accuracy in predicting 1-year OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our index and random forest was effective in predicting 1-year survival. However, further validation in diverse populations is necessary to establish their generalizability.

The prognosis of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in infants and patients under 3 years old with acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients <3 years of age remains controversial. Data on haploidentical donor (HID) transplants in this age group is limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 97 patients with acute leukemia aged <3 years who underwent HID transplantation at our institute.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and 3-year cumulative incidence rate of treatment-related mortality were 69.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.9%-78.7%), 74.2% (95% CI: 65.2%-83.2%), and 3.6% (95% CI: 0.9%-9.7%) in all 97 patients, respectively. The 3-year DFS and OS rate in patients diagnosed <1 year and patients diagnosed ≥1 year were comparable: 77.8% (95% CI: 62.2%-93.4%) versus 66.3% (95% CI: 55.0%-77.6%, p = .253) and 82.5% (95% CI: 66.3-98.7%) versus 72.8% (95% CI: 61.9%-83.7%, p = .153), respectively. At the last follow-up, 23 patients had died, and 20 had died of relapse. Multivariate analysis revealed that positive pre-HSCT flow cytometric minimal residual disease (hazard ratio 5.605, p = .000) and AML-M7 expression (hazard ratio 2.906, p = .014) were independent adverse prognostic variables for relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

HID transplantation is potent and safe for infants and young patients with acute leukemia. Relapse is the primary cause of treatment failure.

Prospective PTCTC trial of myeloablative haplo-BMT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for pediatric acute leukemias

Promising results have been reported for adult patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies undergoing haploidentical bone marrow transplant (haploBMT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). To our knowledge, we report results from the first multicenter trial for pediatric and young adult patients with high-risk acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium. Nine centers performed transplants in 32 patients having acute leukemias or MDS, with myeloablative conditioning (MAC), haploBMT with PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. The median patient age was 12 years. Diagnoses included AML (15), ALL (11), mixed-lineage leukemia (1), and MDS (5). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) at 180 days was 0%. The cumulative incidence (CuI) of grade 2 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) on day 100 was 13%. No patients developed grades 3-4 aGVHD. The CuI of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 1 year was 4%. Donor engraftment occurred in 27 patients (84%). Primary graft failures included 3 patients who received suboptimal bone marrow grafts; all successfully engrafted after second transplants. The CuI of relapse at 1 year was 32%, with more relapse among patients MRD positive pre-BMT vs MRD negative. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 77% and 73%, and event-free survival rate at 1 and 2 years were 68% and 64%. There was no TRM or severe aGVHD, low cGVHD, and favorable relapse and survival rates. This successful pilot trial has led to a phase 3 trial comparing MAC haploBMT vs HLA-matched unrelated donor BMT in the Children's Oncology Group. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02120157.

The current landscape: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

One of the consistent features in development of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the rapidity with which discoveries in the laboratory are translated into innovations in clinical care. Just a few years after murine studies demonstrated that rescue from radiation induced marrow failure is mediated by cellular not humoral factors, E. Donnall Thomas reported on the transfer of bone marrow cells into irradiated leukemia patients. This was followed quickly by the first descriptions of Graft versus Leukemia (GvL) effect and Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD). Despite the pivotal nature of these findings, early human transplants were uniformly unsuccessful and identified the challenges that continue to thwart transplanters today - leukemic relapse, regimen related toxicity, and GvHD. While originally only an option for young, fit patients with a matched family donor, expansion of the donor pool to include unrelated donors, umbilical cord blood units, and more recently the growing use of haploidentical donors have all made transplant a more accessible therapy for patients with ALL. Novel agents for conditioning, prevention and treatment of GvHD have improved outcomes and investigators continue to develop novel treatment strategies that balance regimen related toxicity with disease control. Our evolving understanding of how to prevent and treat GvHD and how to prevent relapse are incorporated into novel clinical trials that are expected to further improve outcomes. Here we review current considerations and future directions for both adult and pediatric patients undergoing HCT for ALL, including indication for transplant, donor selection, cytoreductive regimens, and outcomes.

Evaluation of Children with Malignancies for Blood and Marrow Transplantation: A Report from the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines

Evaluation of a candidate for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a complex process with substantial intercenter variability. Although literature providing guidance for evaluating the eligibility of adults is well established, similar guidance for children is lacking. To address gaps between adult recommendations and the specific needs of children, we convened a panel of pediatric HCT experts from a wide geographic range of American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) member institutions to offer recommendations for pediatric-focused pre-HCT evaluation. In this report from the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines, we present a practical framework for evaluating children with malignancies who are candidates for HCT. We also highlight key differences from adults and emphasize areas of unmet need that require additional research to delineate best practices.

Efficacy of Azacitidine and Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion after HSCT in Pediatric Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Retrospective Pre-Post Study

Pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) continue to have high rates of relapse. In 2018, Phoenix Children's Hospital started using post-HSCT maintenance therapy in patients with AML in attempt to decrease the number of relapses after HSCT. This therapy consisted of the hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA; 6 cycles starting on day +60) and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; 3 escalating doses beginning after day +120). We aimed to compare 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) post-HSCT between patients with AML who received post-HSCT maintenance therapy with AZA and prophylactic DLI and historical control patients who did not receive post-HSCT therapy. This retrospective pre-post study was conducted at Phoenix Children's Hospital and included patients with AML who underwent HSCT between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2022. We compared LFS, overall survival (OS), and immune reconstitution patterns post-HSCT between patients with AML who received post-HSCT maintenance therapy with AZA and prophylactic DLI (postintervention group) and historical control patients who did not receive this post-HSCT maintenance therapy (preintervention group). Sixty-three patients were evaluable. After excluding 7 patients who died or relapsed prior to day +60, 56 patients remained, including 39 in the preintervention group and 17 in the postintervention group. The median age at transplantation was 9.1 years in the preintervention group and 11 years in the postintervention group (P = .33). The 2-year LFS was 61.5% in the preintervention group, compared to 88.2% in the postintervention group (P = .06). The 2-year OS was 69.2% in the preintervention group and 88.2% in the postintervention group (P = .15). The rates of CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cell and CD19⁺ B cell recovery were faster in the preintervention group compared to the postintervention group (P = .004 and .0006, respectively). In this limited retrospective study, post-HSCT maintenance therapy using AZA and prophylactic DLI was well tolerated; however, its efficacy is yet to be fully determined.

Busulfan, fludarabine, and melphalan are effective conditioning for pediatric and young adult patients with myeloid malignancies underdoing matched sibling or alternative donor transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a curative option for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies.

PROCEDURE

We present our 10-year experience (October 2012 to October 2021) of consecutive allo-HCT in patients with myeloid malignancies treated on the pediatric HCT service and conditioned with myeloablative targeted dose-busulfan (BU), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL). Twenty-three children, adolescents, and young adult patients (CAYA) (median age 15.4 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 17), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 4), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 2) underwent allo-HCT post-BU-FLU-MEL. Four patients had treatment-related AML/MDS. Donor/stem cell source was matched sibling donor (MSD) PBSC (n = 7), matched unrelated donor (MUD) PBSC (n = 2), umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n = 3), or haploidentical-BMT (n = 11). Risk stratification was low (n = 2), intermediate (n = 15), high (n = 3), and very high risk (n = 1). The two patients with CML had failed tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 41.6 months, the relapse rate is only 4.5% with an overall survival (OS) 100%, progression-free survival (PFS) 95.5%, and graft-versus-host-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) 67.8%. The donor source and the acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen significantly impacted grade II-IV aGvHD 66.7% versus 19.2% (p = .039) and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGvHD) 66.7% versus 0% (p = .002) in the patients receiving MSD or MUD PBSC compared to haplo-BMT, respectively, resulting in improved GRFS in haplo-BMT, 83.3% compared to 40% matched donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) (p = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that BU-FLU-MEL is efficacious conditioning for disease control in young patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing MSD or alternative donor allo-HCT, but in the setting of PBSC grafts with cyclosporine A-methotrexate (CSA-MTX) GvHD prophylaxis, it results in an unacceptably high incidence of GvHD.

Haploidentical vs. HLA-matched donor hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission: A collaborative retrospective study of the Spanish Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation in Children (GETMON/GETH) and the Spanish Childhood Relapsed ALL Board (ReALLNet)

Introduction

Studies addressing the role of haploidentical as alternative to HLA-matched donors for stem cell transplantation (SCT) often include patients with diverse hematological malignancies in different remission statuses.

Methods

We compared outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing SCT in second complete remission (CR2) from haploidentical (n = 25) versus HLA-matched donor (n = 51).

Results

Patients were equally distributed across both groups according to age, immunophenotype, time to and site of relapse, relapse risk-group allocation, and minimal residual disease (MRD) before SCT. Incidence of graft failure, acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), and other early complications did not differ between both groups. We found no differences in overall survival (58.7% versus 59.5%; p = .8), leukemia free survival (LFS) (48% versus 36.4%; p = .5), event free survival (40% versus 34.4%; p = .69), cumulative incidence (CI) of subsequent relapse (28% versus 40.9%; p = .69), treatment related mortality (24% versus 23.6%; p = .83), CI of cGVHD (4.5% versus 18.7%; p = .2), and chronic GVHD-free and leukemia-free survival (44% versus 26.3%; p = .3) after haploidentical donor SCT. Chronic GVHD (HR = 0.09; p=.02) had protective impact, and MRD ≥ 0.01% before SCT (HR = 2.59; p=.01) had unfavorable impact on LFS.

Discussion

These results support the role of haploidentical donor SCT in children with ALL in CR2.

Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen in Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide in Children With High-risk Hematologic Malignancies

Limited information is available on outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide using myeloablative conditioning regimens in children and adolescents. We report the results of a single-institution retrospective study of myeloablative haploSCT in 36 children and adolescents (median age, 8 y; range, 9 mo to 22 y) with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Donor engraftment occurred in 31 of 33 evaluable patients (94%). Recovery of neutrophils and platelets occurred at a median of 15 and 20 days. Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and grades III to IV at 100 days was 36±8.7% and 10±5.4% and of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 55±9.2%, with 31±8.6% moderate to severe. Nonrelapse mortality was 16±6.1% and 22±6.9% at 100 days and 1 year. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was 32±8.8%. With a median follow-up of 57 months (range, 8 to 89 mo), the overall survival and event-free survival at 4 years was 55.6±8.7% and 44.8±8.5%. Myeloablative conditioning T-replete haploSCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide is a viable alternative to matched unrelated transplantation for children and adolescents with high-risk hematologic malignancies. The high rates of nonrelapse mortality and chronic GVHD is a concern and deserves careful consideration.

Pediatric males receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant lose their male disadvantage in disease risk after the procedure: a retrospective observational study

Sex differences play a relevant role in cancer susceptibility, incidence and survival. Exploring such differences is difficult because of the close interplay of genetic, epigenetic and hormonal factors. However, a better understanding of the role of such disparities in cancer mechanisms could improve its prevention and therapy. Our study explores how sex differences in pediatric outcomes vary after undergoing first and advanced‐line therapy for hematological malignancies. The primary goal was to evaluate if sex differences in pediatric outcomes after first‐line therapy persist after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The secondary goal was to analyze sex differences in disease risk at onset and pediatric outcomes after first‐line therapy to compare our results with the literature's reported results. Among a total of 485 patients (280 males, 205 females) admitted for hematological malignancies, disease risk at the onset was significantly higher in males (P < .05). One hundred and seventy‐four patients (111 males and 63 females) had a high‐risk disease requiring HSCT. Before HSCT, all patients underwent myeloablative conditioning, which substantially impaired gonadal function. Although the number of boys undergoing HSCT was almost double that of girls, there were no sex‐related differences in overall survival, cancer relapse and complications after HSCT exposure (P > .05). These findings suggest that the existing sex differences in cancer risk ab initio can be somehow flattened by a conditioning regimen, shedding new light on the role of hormonal factors in cancer mechanism and management.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation and immune effector cell therapy: an international and multidisciplinary consensus statement

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and immune effector cell therapy is controversial and evidence-based guidelines have not been established. Remarkable advancements in HCT and immune effector cell therapies have changed expectations around reversibility of organ dysfunction and survival for affected patients. Herein, members of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network (HCT and cancer immunotherapy subgroup), the Pediatric Diseases Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the supportive care committee of the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium (PTCTC), and the Pediatric Intensive Care Oncology Kids in Europe Research (POKER) group of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) provide consensus recommendations on the use of ECMO in children receiving HCT and immune effector cell therapy. These are the first international, multidisciplinary consensus-based recommendations on the use of ECMO in this patient population. This Review provides a clinical decision support tool for paediatric haematologists, oncologists, and critical care physicians during the difficult decision-making process of ECMO candidacy and management. These recommendations can represent a base for future research studies focused on ECMO selection criteria and bedside management.

PTCy-based Haploidentical vs Matched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood HSCT Using Myeloablative Targeted Busulfan-based Conditioning for Pediatric Acute Leukemia

Haploidentical related donor (HRD) is a common alternative donor strategy used when matched sibling or unrelated donors are not available for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there have been no studies comparing HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT with antithymocyte globulin, using similar busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen in pediatric acute leukemia. Here, we compared the outcomes in children and adolescents with high-risk acute leukemia after HRD HSCT with PTCy (n=35) and MUD HSCT (n=45) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning using intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring. The median follow-up times of the HRD and MUD groups were 3.7 and 4.6 years, respectively. No engraftment failure was observed in both groups. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV (34.3% versus 48.9%, p=0.142), grades III-IV (2.9% vs. 8.9%, p=0.272), moderate to severe chronic GVHD (11.4% vs. 18.3%, p=0.417), relapse (25.6% vs. 28.0%, p=0.832), and non-relapse mortality (0% vs. 2.2%, p=0.420) were not significantly different between the two groups. The 3-year severe chronic GVHD-free/relapse-free (GRFS), leukemia-free (LFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 62.9% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 45.8%, 80.0%) versus 49.8% (95% CI, 34.9%, 64.7%; p=0.318), 74.4% (95% CI, 58.7%, 90.1%) versus 67.5% (95% CI, 53.4%, 81.6%; p=0.585), and 88.6% (95% CI, 78.0%, 99.2%) versus 83.7% (95% CI, 72.5%, 94.9%; p=0.968), respectively. In a subgroup analysis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients (HRD, n=17; MUD, n=26), the 3-year GRFS, LFS, and OS rates of the HRD and MUD groups were 49.4% (95% CI, 24.3%, 74.5%) versus 39.5% (95% CI, 19.7%, 59.3%; p=0.601), 61.8% (95% CI, 37.5%, 86.1%) versus 63.6% (95% CI, 44.4%, 82.8%; p=0.872), and 82.4% (95% CI, 64.4%, 100%) versus 84.2% (95% CI, 70.1%, 98.3%; p=0.445), respectively. In acute myeloid leukemia patients (HRD, n=16; MUD, n=16), the 3-year GRFS, LFS, and OS rates of the HRD and MUD groups were 80.8% (95% CI, 61.2%, 100%) versus 61.9% (95% CI, 37.8%, 86.0%; p=0.326), 87.1% (95% CI, 70.2%, 100%) versus 73.9% (95% CI, 51.8%, 96.0%; p=0.478), and 93.8% (95% CI, 81.8%, 100%) versus 85.6% (95% CI, 67.0%, 100%; p=0.628), respectively. Although the difference was not statistically significant and the number of patients was small, the promising outcomes of HRD HSCT in AML patients were encouraging. Our results demonstrated that HRD HSCT with PTCy using a targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning shows outcomes similar to those of MUD HSCT with antithymocyte globulin. HRD HSCT with PTCy could be a feasible option for pediatric high-risk acute leukemia patients who lack an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor.

Since everyone has a donor, why are some eligible patients still not transplanted?

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is an important treatment option for malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases. Despite increasing the potential donor pool for hematopoietic cell transplantation there are many patients who are unable to access this treatment. There are several biologic and non-biologic factors that may explain lower utilization of transplantation. Biologic factors associated with lower utilization include older age, multiple comorbidities, persons of African American descent and high-risk disease that may not respond optimally to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Non-biologic factors associated with lower utilization include lower educational (without a high school diploma) or social status, uninsured, Medicaid or Medicare insurance and in persons aged ≥60 years, when the distance between their residence and hospital was greater than 37 miles. The decision to proceed to hematopoietic cell transplantation is a dialogue between the patient and the treating physician. While some patients may be considered poor candidates for continued treatment including hematopoietic cell transplantation others may be offered novel pharmacologic and cellular therapies with a capacity to deliver specific immunologic antitumor responses. Pharmacologic and cellular therapies are relatively recent, and it is not known whether the biologic and non-biologic factors that limit access to transplantation will limit access to these newer treatments.

Factors Impacting Overall and Event-Free Survival following Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be used to consolidate chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy-induced remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but little is known about the factors impacting overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for post-CAR hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The present study's primary objective was to identify factors associated with OS and EFS for consolidative HSCT following CAR-induced complete remission (CR) in transplantation-naïve patients. Secondary objectives included evaluation of OS/EFS, relapse-free survival and cumulative incidence of relapse for all patients who proceeded to HSCT, stratified by first and second HSCT, as well as the tolerability of HSCT following CAR-induced remission. This was a retrospective review of children and young adults enrolled on 1 of 3 CAR T cell trials at the National Cancer Institute targeting CD19, CD22, and CD19/22 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01593696, NCT02315612, and NCT03448393) who proceeded directly to HSCT following CAR T cell therapy. Between July 2012 and February 2021, 46 children and young adults with pre-B ALL went directly to HSCT following CAR therapy. Of these patients, 34 (74%) proceeded to a first HSCT, with a median follow-up of 50.8 months. Transplantation-naïve patients were heavily pretreated prior to CAR T cell therapy (median, 3.5 lines of therapy; range, 1 to 12) with significant prior immunotherapy exposure (blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and/or CAR T cell therapy in patients receiving CD22 or CD19/22 constructs (88%; 15 of /17)). Twelve patients (35%) had primary refractory disease, and the median time from CAR T cell infusion to HSCT Day 0 was 54.5 days (range, 42 to 127 days). The median OS following first HSCT was 72.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 months to not estimable [NE]), with a median EFS of 36.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 months to NE). At 12 and 24 months, the OS was 76.0% (95% CI, 57.6% to 87.2%) and 60.7% (95% CI, 40.8% to 75.8%), respectively, and EFS was 64.6% (95% CI, 46.1% to 78.1%) and 50.9% (95% CI, 32.6% to 66.6%), respectively. The individual factors associated with both decreased OS and EFS in univariate analyses for post-CAR consolidative HSCT in transplantation-naïve patients included ≥5 prior lines of therapy (not reached [NR] versus 12.4 months, P = .014; NR versus 4.8 months, P = .063), prior blinatumomab therapy (NR versus 16.9 months, P = .0038; NR versus 4.4 months, P = .0025), prior inotuzumab therapy (NR versus 11.5 months, P = .044; 36.9 months versus 2.7 months, P = .0054) and ≥5% blasts (M2/M3 marrow) pre-CAR T cell therapy (NR versus 17 months, P = .019; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .035). Primary refractory disease was associated with improved OS/EFS post-HSCT (NR versus 21.9 months, P = .075; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .024). Extensive prior therapy, particularly immunotherapy, and high disease burden each individually adversely impacted OS/EFS following post-CAR T cell consolidative HSCT in transplantation-naïve patients, owing primarily to relapse. Despite this, HSCT remains an important treatment modality in long-term cure. Earlier implementation of HSCT before multiply relapsed disease and incorporation of post-HSCT risk mitigation strategies in patients identified to be at high-risk of post-HSCT relapse may improve outcomes.

Beyond steroids: A systematic review and proposed solutions to managing acute graft-versus-host disease in adolescents and young adults

The outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with hematologic malignancies have been shown to be poorer when compared to results in children, due to a combination of higher relapse rates and greater treatment-related mortality (TRM). Although differences in relapse risk have been studied extensively, toxicity has been examined and reported less often. In this systematic review, we summarize recently published studies that have examined the differences in rates of TRM and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in AYAs and children with hematologic malignancies, and attempt to explain why these disparities exist and how they impact outcomes. In addition, we present best practices for management of steroid-refractory GVHD that are likely to improve survival in this patient population. Further, we propose the development of personalized, risk-based approaches for the prevention and treatment of GVHD that incorporate novel platforms and interventions. We believe this individualized approach is likely to reduce toxicity and greatly improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.

The Role of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers potentially curative treatment for many children with high-risk or relapsed acute leukemia (AL), thanks to the combination of intense preparative radio/chemotherapy and the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Over the years, progress in high-resolution donor typing, choice of conditioning regimen, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis and supportive care measures have continuously improved overall transplant outcome, and recent successes using alternative donors have extended the potential application of allotransplantation to most patients. In addition, the importance of minimal residual disease (MRD) before and after transplantation is being increasingly clarified and MRD-directed interventions may be employed to further ameliorate leukemia-free survival after allogeneic HSCT. These advances have occurred in parallel with continuous refinements in chemotherapy protocols and the development of targeted therapies, which may redefine the indications for HSCT in the coming years. This review discusses the role of HSCT in childhood AL by analysing transplant indications in both acute lymphoblastic and acute myeloid leukemia, together with current and most promising strategies to further improve transplant outcome, including optimization of conditioning regimen and MRD-directed interventions.