An LSC-based MRD assay to complement the traditional MFC method for prediction of AML relapse: a prospective study

Prognostic Value of Dynamic Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring by Multiflowcytometry in Elderly Patients With Nonintensively Treated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

The clinical prognostic value of monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing nonintensive treatment remains insufficiently established. The aim of this work was to examine MRD status at various time points, highlighting the potential for pre-emptive therapy to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

Inpatient data from 2017 to 2024 were used in this retrospective study. Bone marrow samples were analyzed for MRD using multiparametric flow cytometry at the end of cycles 1, 2, 4, and 7, before the next therapy course. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used to assess factors affecting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and logistic regression evaluated the interaction between MRD and baseline features.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were enrolled for MRD evaluation. MRD1, MRD2, MRD4, and MRD7 was significantly associated with both OS and DFS. Early MRD negativity leads to longer survival time, and the later MRD turns negative, the higher the risk of relapse, and ELN 2017 high risk and myeloid gene mutation are adverse factors affecting time to MRD negative status.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic MRD monitoring has predictive value for nonintensive treatment in AML patients. Proper use of MRD and baseline features allows treatment adjustments based on an accurate estimation of relapse risk.

Stem cell transplantation indications for patients with acute leukemia determined by measurable residual disease: what we know and what we do not know

Acute leukemia (AL), which includes acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), is a hematological malignancy characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature myeloid or lymphoid cells. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a therapeutic option for patients with AL. Determination of transplantation indications is a key step in successful ASCT and in curing patients. Currently, the measurable residual disease (MRD) is used as a biomarker for response evaluation, relapse prediction, preemptive therapy, and post-remission treatment selection. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques for MRD detection. We focused mainly on the residual disease-directed selection of transplant indications for patients with either AML or ALL and provided expert opinions in these settings. We also discuss the challenges associated with transplantation indications and propose expert opinions and future directions for the selection of indications for transplantation.

Lack of Evidence Supporting a Significant Benefit of Pre-Transplant Consolidation Therapy in AML CR2 Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-established curative treatment option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2). However, whether the addition of consolidation chemotherapy after achieving CR2 can improve transplant outcomes remains controversial. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed consecutive AML patients who underwent their first HSCT in CR2 at our institution between January 2015 and December 2019. Results: For the consolidation (n = 72) and no consolidation groups (n = 63), the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was (17.6% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.54), the 5-year non-relapse mortality rate (NRM) was (9.7% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.20), the 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was (72.7% vs. 62.7%; p = 0.15), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was (81.9% vs. 68.3%; p = 0.08). Additional consolidation therapy to achieve negative measurable residual disease (MRD) did not result in significantly improved outcomes compared to immediate HSCT in MRD positive status, with similar LFS (76.9% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.2) and OS (88.3% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.14). Multivariable analysis indicated that consolidation chemotherapy did not significantly affect CIR, NRM, LFS, or OS. Conclusions: Our findings suggest no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups, indicating that AML patients in CR2 might proceed to HSCT without delay.

The expression level of EVI1 and clinical features help to distinguish prognostic heterogeneity in the AML entity with EVI1 overexpression

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 3q26 rearrangements results in a poor prognosis and typically causes ecotropic viral integration site1 (EVI1) overexpression (EVI1oe); however, many AML patients with EVI1oe have undetected 3q26 rearrangements. The aim of this study was to restratify AML patients with EVI1oe. We retrospectively reviewed the diagnostic outcomes of 1327 patients tested at our institute from November 2015 to December 2022. A total of 468 de novo AML patients were included, with 191 classified as EVI1oe. Eighteen AML patients with EVI1oe had detectable 3q26 rearrangements and had significantly greater EVI1 expression levels than those without rearrangements. A new cutoff value for EVI1oe in AML patients of 122 % was determined using the ROC curve based on overall survival (OS) and effectively distinguished the prognosis of EVI1oe AML patients without detectable 3q26 rearrangements (p = 0.0051 and 0.0039, respectively). Using this cutoff value, ELN stratification, transplantation status, response to induction therapy, and bone marrow blast percentage, we constructed a nomogram model (C-index = 0.808). This model was used to stratify patients into two risk subgroups, with the low-risk subgroup showing better OS than the high-risk subgroup did (p < 0.001 in the training cohort; p = 0.002 in the validation cohort). In conclusion, AML patients with EVI1oe have heterogeneous prognoses. The use of EVI1 expression levels in combination with other risk factors may enable accurate prognostic stratification of AML patients with EVI1oe.

TIM-3 marks measurable residual leukemic stem cells responsible for relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

In this study, we investigated the measurable residual leukemic stem cell (MR-LSC) population after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), utilizing T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (TIM-3) expression as a functional marker of AML leukemic stem cells (LSCs). Analysis of the CD34+CD38- fraction of bone marrow cells immediately after achievement of engraftment revealed the presence of both TIM-3+LSCs and TIM-3- donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) at varying ratios. Genetic analysis confirmed that TIM-3+ cells harbored patient-specific mutations identical to those found in AML clones, whereas TIM-3- cells did not, indicating that TIM-3+CD34+CD38- cells represent residual AML LSCs. In 92 allo-SCT occasions involving 83 AML patients, we enumerated the frequencies of TIM-3+LSCs immediately after achieving hematologic complete remission with complete donor cell chimerism. Notably, only 22.2% of patients who achieved a TIM-3+MR-LSClow status (<60%) experienced relapse, with a median event-free survival (EFS) of 1581 days (median follow-up duration was 2177 days among event-free survivors). Conversely, 87.5% of patients with TIM-3+MR-LSCint/high (≥60%) relapsed, with a median EFS of 140.5 days. Furthermore, MR-LSC status emerged as a significant independent risk factor for relapse (hazard ratio, 8.56; p < 0.0001), surpassing the impact of patient disease status prior to allo-SCT, including failure to achieve complete remission (hazard ratio, 1.98; p = 0.048). These findings suggest that evaluating TIM-3+ MR-LSCs immediately after engraftment, which reflects the competitive reconstitution of residual TIM-3+ LSCs and donor HSCs, may be valuable for predicting outcomes in AML patients undergoing allo-SCT.

Pretransplantation risk factors for positive MRD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML patients: a prospective study

We aimed to prospectively explore the risk factors for measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in AML patients (n = 478). The cumulative incidences (CIs) of post-SCT MRD positivity at 100 days, 360 days and 3 years were 4.6%, 12.1% and 18.3%, respectively. Positive pre-SCT MRD and pre-SCT active disease were risk factors for post-SCT MRD positivity at both 360 days and 3 years (P < 0.001). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk stratification was a risk factor for positive post-SCT MRD at 360 days (P = 0.044). A scoring system for predicting post-SCT MRD positivity at 360 days was established by using pre-SCT MRD, pre-SCT active disease and ELN 2017 risk stratification. The CI of positive post-SCT MRD at 3 years was 13.2%, 23.7%, and 43.9% for patients with scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the scoring system was associated with a higher CI of post-SCT MRD positivity, leukemia relapse and inferior survival. Our data indicate that positive pre-SCT MRD status, pre-SCT active disease, and ELN 2017 risk stratification are risk factors for positive post-SCT MRD status in AML patients.

Significance of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains an important curative-intent treatment for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but AML recurrence after allografting is common. Many factors associated with relapse after allogeneic HCT have been identified over the years. Central among these is measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD) as detected by multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and/or next-generation sequencing. Demonstration of a strong, independent prognostic role of pre- and early post-HCT MRD has raised hopes MRD could also serve as a predictive biomarker to inform treatment decision-making, with emerging data indicating the potential value to guide candidacy assessment for allografting as a post-remission treatment strategy, the selection of conditioning intensity, use of small molecule inhibitors as post-HCT maintenance therapy, and preemptive infusion of donor lymphocytes. Monitoring for leukemia recurrence after HCT and surrogacy for treatment response are other considerations for the clinical use of MRD data. In this review, we will outline the current landscape of MRD as a biomarker for patients with AML undergoing HCT and discuss areas of uncertainty and ongoing research.

The role of the primitive marker CD133 in CD34-negative acute myeloid leukemia for the detection of leukemia stem cells

The most important reason for dismal outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the development of relapse. Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are hypothesized to initiate relapse, and high CD34+CD38- LSC load is associated with poor prognosis. In 10% of AML patients, CD34 is not or is low expressed on the leukemic cells (<1%), and CD34+CD38- LSCs are absent. These patients are classified as CD34-negative. We aimed to determine whether the primitive marker CD133 can detect LSCs in CD34-negative AML. We retrospectively quantified 148 CD34-negative patients for proportions of CD34-CD133+ and CD133+CD38- cell fractions in the diagnostic samples of CD34-negative patients in the HOVON102 and HOVON132 trials. No prognostic difference was found between patients with high or low proportions of CD34-CD133+, which is found to be aberrantly expressed in AML. A high level of CD133+CD38- cells was not associated with poor overall survival, and expression in AML was similar to normal bone marrow. To conclude, CD133 is useful as an additional primitive marker for the detection of leukemic blast cells in CD34-negative AML. However, CD133+CD38 alone is not suitable for the detection of LSCs at diagnosis.

Detection methods and prognosis implications of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refers to the quantity of residual leukemic cells in a patient after treatment.According to the latest agreements, MRD in AML offering essential prognostic insights. However, there is ongoing debate regarding MRD-based monitoring and treatment strategies. There are multiple platforms for detecting MRD, each varying in sensitivity and suitability for different patients. MRD not only predicts treatment outcomes but also serves as an indicator of treatment effectiveness and a prognostic biomarker. In AML, most retrospective studies indicate that patients who are MRD-positive or show increasing MRD levels at specific time points during remission have significantly higher risks of relapse and mortality compared to MRD-negative patients. Although achieving MRD-negative status can improve patient prognosis, the possibility of relapse remains. Despite the correlation between MRD and clinical outcomes, MRD assessment methods are not yet standardized, leading to discrepancies in results across different techniques. To provide reliable MRD results, it is essential to optimize and standardize MRD detection methods. Methods for assessing MRD include multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and molecular assays, chosen based on disease characteristics. This review focuses on currently available MRD detection methods and discusses how the prognostic value of MRD test results informs personalized treatment strategies for AML patients.

Consensus on the monitoring, treatment, and prevention of leukaemia relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: 2024 update

The consensus in 2018 from The Chinese Society of Haematology (CSH) on the monitoring, treatment, and prevention of leukaemia relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) facilitated the standardization of clinical practices in China and progressive integration with the world. To integrate recent developments and further improve the consensus, a panel of experts from the CSH recently updated the following consensus: (1) integrate risk-adapted, measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided strategy on modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and interferon-α into total therapy, which was pioneered and refined by Chinese researchers; (2) provide additional evidence of the superiority of haploidentical HSCT (the dominant donor source in China) to matched HSCT for high-risk populations, especially for pre-HSCT MRD-positive patients; (3) support the rapid progress of techniques for MRD detection, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and leukaemia stem cell-based MRD detection; and (4) address the role of new targeted options in transplant settings. In conclusion, the establishment of a "total therapy" strategy represents a great step forward. We hope that the consensus updated by Chinese scholars will include the latest cutting-edge developments and inspire progress in post-HSCT relapse management.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Evaluation by Flow Cytometry

With recent technological advances and significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the updated fifth edition WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the newly introduced International Consensus Classification (ICC), as well as the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 2022, require the integration of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular data, alongside clinical and morphologic findings, for accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and guiding therapeutic strategies in AML. Flow cytometry offers rapid and sensitive immunophenotyping through a multiparametric approach and is a pivotal laboratory tool for the classification of AML, identification of therapeutic targets, and monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) post therapy. The association of immunophenotypic features and recurrent genetic abnormalities has been recognized and applied in informing further diagnostic evaluation and immediate therapeutic decision-making. Recently, the evolving role of machine learning models in assisting flow cytometric data analysis for the automated diagnosis and prediction of underlying genetic alterations has been illustrated.

Longitudinal ultra-sensitive mutation burden sequencing for precise minimal residual disease assessment in AML

Relapse is one of the major challenges in clinical treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Though minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring plays a crucial role in quantitative assessment of the disease, molecular MRD analysis has been mainly limited to patients diagnosed with gene fusions and NPM1 mutations. Here, we report a longitudinal ultra-sensitive mutation burden (UMB) monitoring strategy for accurate MRD analysis in AML patients regardless of genetic abnormality types. Using a Quantitative Blocker Displacement Amplification (QBDA) sequencing panel with limit of detection below 0.01% variant allele frequency (VAF), a hazard ratio of 14.8 (p < 0.001) is observed in cumulative incidence of relapse analysis of 20 patients with ≥ 2 samples during complete remission (CR). The ROC area under curve (AUC) is 0.98 when predicting relapse within 30 weeks of CR timepoint 2 (N = 20). Furthermore, we demonstrate quantitating VAF below 0.01% is essential for accurate relapse prediction.

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing is used in many haematological cancers to estimate relapse risk and to direct therapy. Sometimes MRD-test results are used for regulatory approval. However, some people including regulators wrongfully believe results of MRD-testing are highly accurate and of proven efficacy in directing therapy. We review MRD-testing technologies and evaluate the accuracy of MRD-testing for predicting relapse and the strength of evidence supporting efficacy of MRD-guided therapy. We show that at the individual level MRD-test results are often an inaccurate relapse predictor. Also, no convincing data indicate that increasing therapy-intensity based on a positive MRD-test reduces relapse risk or improves survival. We caution against adjusting therapy-intensity based solely on results of MRD-testing.

Immunophenotypic features of early haematopoietic and leukaemia stem cells

Many tumours are organised in a hierarchical structure with at its apex a cell that can maintain, establish, and repopulate the tumour-the cancer stem cell. The haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) is the founder cell for all functional blood cells. Like HSCs, the leukaemia stem cells (LSC) are hypothesised to be the leukaemia-initiating cells, which have features of stemness such as self-renewal, quiescence, and resistance to cytotoxic drugs. Immunophenotypically, CD34+CD38- defines HSCs by adding lineage negativity and CD90+CD45RA-. At which stage of maturation the further differentiation is blocked, determines the type of leukaemia, and determines the immunophenotype of the LSC specific to the leukaemia type. No apparent LSC phenotype has been described in lymphoid leukaemia, and it is debated if a specific acute lymphocytic leukaemia-initiating cell is present, as all cells are capable of engraftment in a secondary mouse model. In chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, a B-cell clone is responsible for uncontrolled proliferation, not a specific LSC. In chronic and acute myeloid leukaemia, LSC is described as CD34+CD38- with the expression of a marker that is aberrantly expressed (LSC marker), such as CD45RA, CD123 or in the case of chronic myeloid leukaemia CD26. In acute myeloid leukaemia, the LSC load had prognostic relevance and might be a biomarker that can be used for monitoring and as an addition to measurable residual disease. However, challenges such as the CD34-negative immunophenotype need to be explored.

Measurable (Minimal) Residual Disease in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): Current State and Perspectives

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) have been traditionally studied through the assessment of blood counts, cytogenetics, and morphology. In recent years, the introduction of molecular assays has improved our ability to diagnose MDS. The role of Measurable (minimal) Residual Disease (MRD) in MDS is evolving, and molecular and flow cytometry techniques have been used in several studies. In this review, we will highlight the evolving concept of MRD in MDS, outline the various techniques utilized, and provide an overview of the studies reporting MRD and the correlation with outcomes.

Droplet digital PCR for sensitive relapse detection in acute myeloid leukaemia patients transplanted by reduced intensity conditioning

INTRODUCTION

Follow-up after allogeneic transplantation in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is guided by measurable residual disease (MRD) testing. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is the preferred MRD platform but unfortunately, 40%-60% of AML patients have no high-quality qPCR target. This study aimed to improve MRD testing by utilising droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). ddPCR offers patient-specific monitoring but concerns of tracking clonal haematopoiesis rather than malignant cells prompt further validation.

METHODS

Retrospectively, we performed MRD testing on blood and bone marrow samples from AML patients transplanted by reduced-intensity conditioning.

RESULTS

The applicability of ddPCR was 39/42 (92.9%). Forty-five ddPCR assays were validated with a 0.0089% median sensitivity. qPCR targeting NPM1 mutation detected relapse 46 days before ddPCR (p = .03). ddPCR detected relapse 34.5 days before qPCR targeting WT1 overexpression (p = .03). In non-relapsing patients, zero false positive ddPCR MRD relapses were observed even when monitoring targets associated with clonal haematopoiesis such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 mutations.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that qPCR targeting NPM1 mutations or fusion transcripts are superior in MRD testing. In the absence of such targets, ddPCR is a promising alternative demonstrating (a) high applicability, (b) high sensitivity, and (c) zero false positive MRD relapses in non-relapsing patients.

A 19-color single-tube full spectrum flow cytometry assay for the detection of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) has emerged as a standard method for quantifying measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia. However, the limited number of available channels on conventional flow cytometers requires the division of a diagnostic sample into several tubes, restricting the number of cells and the complexity of immunophenotypes that can be analyzed. Full spectrum flow cytometers overcome this limitation by enabling the simultaneous use of up to 40 fluorescent markers. Here, we used this approach to develop a good laboratory practice-conform single-tube 19-color MRD detection assay that complies with recommendations of the European LeukemiaNet Flow-MRD Working Party. We based our assay on clinically-validated antibody clones and evaluated its performance on an IVD-certified full spectrum flow cytometer. We measured MRD and normal bone marrow samples and compared the MRD data to a widely used reference MRD-MFC panel generating highly concordant results. Using our newly developed single-tube panel, we established reference values in healthy bone marrow for 28 consensus leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and introduced a semi-automated dimensionality-reduction, clustering and cell type identification approach that aids the unbiased detection of aberrant cells. In summary, we provide a comprehensive full spectrum MRD-MFC workflow with the potential for rapid implementation for routine diagnostics due to reduced cell requirements and ease of data analysis with increased reproducibility in comparison to conventional FlowMRD routines.

Flow cytometric analysis of CD34+ CD38- cells; cell frequency and immunophenotype based on CD45RA expression pattern

INTRODUCTION

The CD34+ CD38- population in bone marrow includes hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Recently, in acute myeloid leukemia, the focus has shifted to flow cytometry analysis targeting CD34+ CD38- leukemic cells due to their effectiveness in minimal/measurable residual disease detection and prognosis prediction. Nevertheless, the immunophenotype and cell frequency of these cells in the bone marrow, in the absence of leukemic cells, remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate detailed characteristics of CD34+ CD38- cells in both normal and leukemic cells by flow cytometry.

METHODS

We compared the cell frequency and immunophenotype of the CD34+ CD38- fraction in the following groups: patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and malignant lymphoma as controls (n = 17), post-treatment patients without abnormal blasts (n = 35), and patients with myeloid malignancies (n = 86). The comparison was based on the presence or absence of CD45RA expression, a marker commonly used to prospectively isolate lymphoid-primed cell populations within the CD34+ CD38- fraction.

RESULTS

The CD34+ CD38- CD45RA+ cell population exhibited a significant expansion in bone marrow without leukemic cells 1 month after cord blood transplantation and in various type of myeloid malignancies, compared to the control group (p < 0.01). Continuous CD45RA expression and notable expansion of the CD34+ CD38- CD45RA- population were exclusively observed in myelodysplastic syndrome-related diseases. The CD34+ CD38- CD45RA+ population displayed frequent expression of various markers in both leukemic and non-leukemic cells, in contrast to the CD34+ CD38- CD45RA- population.

CONCLUSIONS

The CD34+ CD38- fraction should be carefully evaluated considering the nature of normal hematopoietic precursor cells, their cell frequency and immunophenotype, including CD45RA expression pattern, for improving the accuracy of myeloid malignancy diagnosis.

Understanding differential technologies for detection of MRD and how to incorporate into clinical practice

Patient- and leukemia-specific factors assessed at diagnosis classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in risk categories that are prognostic for outcome. The induction phase with intensive chemotherapy in fit patients aims to reach a complete remission (CR) of less than 5% blasts in bone marrow by morphology. To deepen and sustain the response, induction is followed by consolidation treatment. This postremission treatment of patients with AML is graduated in intensity based on this favorable, intermediate, or adverse risk group classification as defined in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) 2022 recommendations. The increment of evidence that measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction can be superimposed on risk group at diagnosis is instrumental in tailoring further treatment accordingly. Several techniques are applied to detect MRD such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative (digital) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing. The clinical implementation of MRD and the technique used differ among institutes, leading to the accumulation of a wide range of data, and therefore harmonization is warranted. Currently, evidence for MRD guidance is limited to the time point after induction using MFC or quantitative PCR for NPM1 and core binding factor abnormalities in intermediate-risk patients. The role of MRD in targeted or nonintensive therapies needs to be clarified, although some data show improved survival in patients achieving CR-MRD negativity. Potential application of MRD for selection of conditioning before stem cell transplantation, monitoring after consolidation, and use as an intermediate end point in clinical trials need further evaluation.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission and no detectable minimal residual disease. A comparative retrospective study with haploidentical transplants of the global committee and the ALWP of the EBMT

In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of intermediate-risk (IR) in first remission (CR1) with no measurable residual disease (MRD negative), the choice of the best consolidation is questionable. 1122 adult patients from 196 centers, transplanted in 2010-21 were analyzed: 547 received an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 575 a Haploidentical donor transplant. Because of a significant interaction, comparisons were done separately for patients with wild-type FLT3 (FLT3-wt) and FLT3-ITD mutation (FLT3-ITD). In FLT3-wt patients, haploidentical transplants had two year lower relapse incidence (RI) (16.9% versus 32.6%; HR = 0.40, p < 0.001), higher NRM higher (17.2% vs 3.5%; HR = 7.02, p < 0.001), similar LFS (65.9% vs 63.8%; p = 0.37) and lower OS (73.2% vs 80.6%; HR = 1.69, p = 0.018). In FLT3-ITD patients, haploidentical transplants had two year lower RI (8.2% vs 47.8%; HR = 0.14, p < 0.001) higher NRM (20.2% vs 5.6%; HR = 3.43, p = 0.002), better LFS (71.5% vs 46.6%; HR = 0.53, p = 0.007) and similar OS (73.5% vs 61.9%; p = 0.44). In IR AML patients with FLT3-wt in MRD negative CR1, autologous stem cell transplantation is a valid option, while in patients with FLT3-ITD, haploidentical transplant is better. Whether autologous transplantation is superior to chemotherapy in FLT3-wt patients and the role of maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors remain to be studied.

Moving toward a conceptualization of measurable residual disease in myelodysplastic syndromes

Approximately 90% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) have somatic mutations that are known or suspected to be oncogenic in the malignant cells. The genetic risk stratification of MDSs has evolved substantially with the introduction of the clinical molecular international prognostic scoring system, which establishes next-generation sequencing at diagnosis as a standard of care. Furthermore, the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias has refined the MDS diagnostic criteria with the introduction of a new MDS/acute myeloid leukemia category. Monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) has historically been used to define remission status, improve relapse prediction, and determine the efficacy of antileukemic drugs in patients with acute and chronic leukemias. However, in contrast to leukemias, assessment of MRD, including tracking of patient-specific mutations, has not yet been formally defined as a biomarker for MDS. This article summarizes current evidence and challenges and provides a conceptual framework for incorporating MRD into the treatment of MDS and future clinical trials.

LSC17 score complements genetics and measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: an ALFA study

Whether the LSC17 gene expression can improve risk stratification in the context of next generation sequencing-based risk stratification and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with intensively treated AML has not been explored. We analyzed LSC17 in 504 adult patients prospectively treated in the ALFA-0702 trial. RUNX1 or TP53 mutations were associated with higher LSC1 scores while CEBPA and NPM1 mutations were associated with lower scores. Patients with high LSC17 scores had a lower rate of complete response (CR) in a multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.41; P = .0007), accounting for European LeukemiaNet 2022 (ELN22), age, and white blood cell count (WBC). LSC17-high status was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 70.0% vs 52.7% in patients with LSC17-low status; P < .0001). In a multivariable analysis considering ELN22, age, and WBC, patients with LSC17-high status had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; P = .048) than those with LSC17-low status. In 123 patients with NPM1-mutated AML in CR, LSC17-high status predicted poorer DFS (HR, 2.34; P = .01), independent of age, WBC, ELN22 risk, and NPM1-MRD. LSC-low status and negative NPM1-MRD identified a subset comprising 48% of patients with mutated NPM1 with a 3-year OS from CR of 93.1% compared with 60.7% in those with LSC17-high status and/or positive NPM1-MRD (P = .0001). Overall, LSC17 assessment refines genetic risk stratification in adult patients with AML treated intensively. Combined with MRD, LSC17 identifies a subset of patients with NPM1-mutated AML with excellent clinical outcome.

Casein Kinase 2 (CK2): A Possible Therapeutic Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The protein kinase CK2 (also known as casein kinase 2) is one of the main contributors to the human phosphoproteome. It is regarded as a possible therapeutic strategy in several malignant diseases, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which is an aggressive bone marrow malignancy. CK2 is an important regulator of intracellular signaling in AML cells, especially PI3K-Akt, Jak-Stat, NFκB, Wnt, and DNA repair signaling. High CK2 levels in AML cells at the first time of diagnosis are associated with decreased survival (i.e., increased risk of chemoresistant leukemia relapse) for patients receiving intensive and potentially curative antileukemic therapy. However, it is not known whether these high CK2 levels can be used as an independent prognostic biomarker because this has not been investigated in multivariate analyses. Several CK2 inhibitors have been developed, but CX-4945/silmitasertib is best characterized. This drug has antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in primary human AML cells. The preliminary results from studies of silmitasertib in the treatment of other malignancies suggest that gastrointestinal and bone marrow toxicities are relatively common. However, clinical AML studies are not available. Taken together, the available experimental and clinical evidence suggests that the possible use of CK2 inhibition in the treatment of AML should be further investigated.

Challenges facing minimal residual disease testing for acute myeloid leukemia and promising strategies to overcome them

INTRODUCTION

Minimal residual disease (MRD) has been an important biomarker for relapse prediction and treatment choice in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). False-positive or false-negative MRD results due to the low specificity and sensitivity of techniques such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, as well as the biological characteristics of residual leukemia cells, including antigen shift, clone involution, heterogeneous genome of the blast cells, and lack of specific targets, all restrict the clinical use of MRD.

AREAS COVERED

We summarized the challenges of the techniques for MRD detection, and their application in the clinical setting. We also discussed strategies to overcome these challenges, such as the MFC MRD method based on leukemia stem cells, single-cell DNA sequencing or single-cell RNA sequencing for the investigation of biological characteristics of residual leukemia cells, and the potential of omics techniques for MRD detection. We further noted out that prospective clinical trials are needed to answer clinical questions related to MRD in patients with AML.

EXPERT OPINION

MRD is an important biomarker for individual therapy of patients with AML. In the future, it is important to increase the specificity and sensitivity of the detection techniques.

Novel Tools for Diagnosis and Monitoring of AML

In recent years, major advances in the understanding of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathogenesis, together with technological progress, have led us into a new era in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with AML. A combination of immunophenotyping, cytogenetic and molecular studies are required for AML diagnosis, including the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels to screen all genetic alterations with diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic value. Regarding AML monitoring, multiparametric flow cytometry and quantitative PCR/RT-PCR are currently the most implemented methodologies for measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluation. Given the limitations of these techniques, there is an urgent need to incorporate new tools for MRD monitoring, such as NGS and digital PCR. This review aims to provide an overview of the different technologies used for AML diagnosis and MRD monitoring and to highlight the limitations and challenges of current versus emerging tools.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells in Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Detection

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy characterized by an abundance of incompletely matured or immature clonally derived hematopoietic precursors called leukemic blasts. Rare leukemia stem cells (LSCs) that can self-renew as well as give rise to leukemic progenitors comprising the bulk of leukemic blasts are considered the cellular reservoir of disease initiation and maintenance. LSCs are widely thought to be relatively resistant as well as adaptive to chemotherapy and can cause disease relapse. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the molecular bases of LSC forms and functions during different stages of disease progression, so we can more accurately identify these cells and design therapies to target them. Irrespective of the morphological, cytogenetic, and cellular heterogeneity of AML, the uniform, singularly important and independently significant prognosticator of disease response to therapy and patient outcome is measurable or minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, defined by residual disease detection below the morphology-based 5% blast threshold. The importance of LSC identification and frequency estimation during MRD detection, in order to make MRD more effective in predicting disease relapse and modifying therapeutic regimen is becoming increasingly apparent. This review focuses on summarizing functional and cellular composition-based LSC identification and linking those studies to current techniques of MRD detection to suggest LSC-inclusive MRD detection as well as outline outstanding questions that need to be addressed to improve the future of AML clinical management and treatment outcomes.

Applying molecular measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia

Molecular testing in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has continued to dramatically advance in recent years, facilitating the ability to detect residual disease at exponentially lower levels. With the advent of the recently updated ELN consensus recommendations, there is increasing complexity to ordering and interpreting measurable residual disease (MRD) assays in AML. We outline the technology itself in conjunction with the relevant testing timepoints, clinically significant thresholds and potential prognostic and therapeutic significance of MRD testing for the major molecular targets in AML. This practical overview should assist haematologists in incorporating molecular MRD assays routinely into their personalised AML clinical management.

The present and future of measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukemia

Considerable progress has been made in the past several years in the scientific understanding of, and available treatments for, acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Achievement of a conventional remission, evaluated cytomorphologically via small bone marrow samples, is a necessary but not sufficient step toward cure. It is increasingly appreciated that molecular or immunophenotypic methods to identify and quantify measurable residual disease (MRD) - populations of leukemia cells below the cytomorphological detection limit - provide refined information on the quality of response to treatment and prediction of the risk of AML recurrence and leukemia-related deaths. The principles and practices surrounding MRD remain incompletely determined however and the genetic and immunophenotypic heterogeneity of AML may prevent a one-sizefits- all approach. Here, we review the current approaches to MRD testing in AML, discuss strengths and limitations, highlight recent technological advances that may improve such testing, and summarize ongoing initiatives to generate the clinical evidence needed to advance the use of MRD testing in patients with AML.