A prognostic model for patients with lymphoma and COVID-19: a multicentre cohort study

Early rituximab monotherapy versus watchful waiting for advanced stage, asymptomatic, low tumour burden follicular lymphoma: long-term results of a randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Initial results of this study, reported after a median follow-up close to 4 years, demonstrated improved time to initiation of new treatment (TTNT) for patients with advanced stage, asymptomatic, low tumour burden follicular lymphoma who received early rituximab monotherapy when compared with watchful waiting. Given the long natural history of follicular lymphoma, the trial was extended to further assess TTNT with longer follow-up. Mature data are presented here.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, conducted at 118 centres in five countries, adult patients with asymptomatic, stage II-IV, grade 1-3a low tumour burden follicular lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1:1) between watchful waiting, rituximab induction (375 mg/m2, intravenous) weekly for four doses (rituximab induction group) and rituximab induction followed by rituximab maintenance at the same dose every 8 weeks for 12 doses (rituximab maintenance group). The rituximab induction group closed early on Sept 30, 2007, and the study was amended to a two-arm trial. The primary endpoint was TTNT, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00112931, and recruitment and follow-up are complete.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 15, 2004, and May 1, 2009, 455 patients were randomly assigned, including 183 to watchful waiting, 82 to rituximab induction, and 190 to rituximab maintenance. Median follow-up was 14·7 years (IQR 13·3-15·6). At 15 years, 65% (95% CI 56-72) of patients in the rituximab maintenance group, 48% (36-60) in the rituximab induction group, and 34% (27-42) in the watchful waiting group had not started new treatment. Median TTNT was not yet reached (95% CI 15·6-not estimable) in the rituximab maintenance group, 14·8 years (7·5-not reached) in the rituximab induction group, and 5·6 years (3·8-8·4) in the watchful waiting group. TTNT was longer in both the rituximab induction and rituximab maintenance groups compared with the watchful waiting group (rituximab induction vs watchful waiting: hazard ratio [HR] 0·55 [95% CI 0·38-0·80], p=0·0019; rituximab maintenance vs watchful waiting: HR 0·36 [0·26-0·50], p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

These mature data with 15 years of follow-up confirm that early rituximab monotherapy substantially delays the need for new treatment for patients with advanced stage, asymptomatic low tumour burden follicular lymphoma, providing an evidence base for its use in this setting and confirming its value for patients who seek to defer or avoid treatment with chemotherapy.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, Lymphoma Research Trust, Lymphoma Association, and Roche.

Clinical and molecular landscape of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection with resistance to remdesivir in immunocompromised patients

Patients with hematologic diseases have experienced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a prolonged, progressive course. Here, we present clinical, pathological, and virological analyses of three cases of prolonged COVID-19 among patients undergoing treatment for B-cell lymphoma. These patients had all been treated with anti-CD20 antibody and bendamustine. Despite various antiviral treatments, high severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) levels persisted for >4 weeks, and two of them succumbed to COVID-19. The autopsy showed bronchopneumonia, interstitial pneumonia, alveolar hemorrhage, and fibrosis. Overlapping cytomegalovirus, fungal and/or bacterial infections were also confirmed. Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 showed accumulation of mutations and changes in variant allele frequencies over time. NSP12 mutations V792I and M794I appeared independently in two cases as COVID-19 progressed. In vitro drug susceptibility analysis and an animal experiment using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated that each mutation, V792 and M794I, was independently responsible for remdesivir resistance and attenuated pathogenicity. E340A, E340D, and F342INS mutations in the spike protein were found in one case, which may account for the sotrovimab resistance. Analysis of autopsy specimens indicated heterogeneous distribution of these mutations. In summary, we demonstrated temporal and spatial diversity in SARS-CoV-2 that evolved resistance to various antiviral agents in malignant lymphoma patients under immunodeficient conditions caused by certain types of immunochemotherapies. Strategies may be necessary to prevent the acquisition of drug resistance and improve outcomes, such as the selection of appropriate treatment strategies for lymphoma considering patients' immune status and the institution of early intensive antiviral therapy.

Outcomes and Risk Factors for Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and Mortality in Patients With Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma: A 7-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Respiratory viral infection (RVI) is a significant complication in patients with hematologic malignancies. While risk factors of lower respiratory tract infections (LRIs) and mortality have been studied in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, data remain limited for patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM). We investigated outcomes and risk factors of LRI and mortality secondary to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or influenza virus (IFV) infections in these populations.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study in adults with lymphoma or MM with RSV or IFV RVIs between 2016 and 2022. Primary outcomes were LRI and all-cause 30- and 90-day mortality.

Results

We analyzed 440 patients with 490 consecutive viral episodes: 297 (61%) with MM and 193 (39%) with lymphoma, 258 (52%) were IFV-related, and 234 (48%) RSV-related (2 coinfections). At presentation, 62% were diagnosed with upper respiratory tract infection (URI) and 38% with LRI. During follow-up, 57% were hospitalized, 8% required intensive care unit transfer, and 20 (4%) died within 30 days. On multivariable analysis, RSV infection (vs IFV), current/former smoking, steroid exposure, lymphopenia (≤200 cells/mL), and high serum creatinine were associated with LRI. MM (vs lymphoma) diagnosis, current/former smoking, lymphopenia, and nosocomial infection were associated with 30-day mortality, whereas LRI (vs URI), current/former smoking, and lymphopenia were associated with 90-day mortality.

Conclusions

We described a high burden of IFV and RSV infections in patients with lymphoma and MM and found risk factors associated with LRI and mortality. These factors could potentially identify high-risk patients, enabling better and prompt management strategies.

Prolonged Viral Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Underlying Haemato-oncological Disease

BACKGROUND/AIM

Case reports describe prolonged COVID19 shedding in patients with malignant hematological disease. Similarly, we observed extended viral shedding in hemato-oncological patients (HP) at our SARS-CoV-2 unit. This raises the question of whether HP are more susceptible to prolonged SARS-CoV-2 shedding and which aspects of immunosuppression contribute to this phenomenon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from HP treated at a single center between 02/2022 and 02/2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 47 HP with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test were included. Additional data on 16 HP were retrieved from literature. The duration of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (t[SARS+]) was compared between subgroups with different diagnoses, immune status, and HP with and without medical treatment of SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS

t[SARS+] of HP was 47 days [interquartile range (IR)=25-95] and 12 HP (19%) were still positive by the end of the follow-up. In our cohort, four HP died while still shedding SARS-CoV-2 [t[SARS+]=47 days (IR=33.5-86)]. Different oncological diagnoses did not influence t[SARS+]. HP under steroids had a significantly longer average t[SARS+] (108 days vs. 45 days; p=0.016). HP with B cell depletion/T cell depletion and leukopenia were found to require more time to test negative for SARS-CoV-2 (p Logrank <0.05). Vaccinated HP had a significantly shorter duration of viral shedding (vaccinated 35.5 days vs. not vaccinated 86 days; p Logrank <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged viral shedding is a common occurrence in HP. Our data illustrate that HP under immune suppression show a significantly longer t[SARS+]. Furthermore, we demonstrate that vaccination influences the length of viral shedding.

Prognostic risk factors of pneumonia associated with COVID-19 in patients with lymphoma

Objective

Patients with hematological malignancies have an elevated risk of developing pneumonia after contracting COVID-19. Lymphoma is the most prevalent hematologic malignancy. It is critical to identify patients at high risk of contracting COVID-19-associated pneumonia.

Methods

From January 11-31, 2023, we distributed questionnaires to patients diagnosed with lymphoma according to 2016 World Health Organization diagnostic and classification criteria. COVID-19 infection was confirmed based on symptoms and laboratory tests. Pneumonia was confirmed using computed tomography scans.

Results

In total, 257 patients were included in this study; 221 patients (86.0%) had COVID-19 infection and 61 (27.6%) of these had pneumonia. Patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) had a significantly higher pneumonia incidence than patients with other lymphoma types (31.8% vs. 27.6%, P=0.005). Higher incidence of pneumonia was observed in patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy (30.0% vs. 16.3%, P=0.048) and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy (51.3% vs. 22.5%, P=0.001). B-NHL (hazard ratio [HR]=3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-10.0, P=0.009), anti-CD20 therapy (HR=2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.2, P=0.050), BTK inhibitor (HR=3.6, 95% CI 1.8-7.4, P<0.001), active therapy (HR=3.0, 95% CI 1.5-5.7, P=0.001), and lack of disease remission (HR=3.7, 95% CI 1.8-7.4, P=0.001) were high-risk factors for developing pneumonia. Anti-PD-1 therapy was a protective factor against pneumonia development (HR=0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.9, P=0.034). In multivariable analysis, BTK inhibitor (HR=3.5, 95% CI 1.6-8.0, P=0.003), active therapy (HR=3.3, 95% CI 1.6-6.8, P=0.001), and disease non-remission (HR=2.9, 1.3-6.4, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for pneumonia development after COVID-19 infection in patients with lymphoma.

Conclusions

Patients with lymphoma receiving BTK inhibitors, undergoing active therapy, and lacking disease remission exhibited a higher risk for pneumonia associated with COVID-19.

Vaccination strategies for patients with lymphoma treated in early lines of therapies: a real-world practice survey among Fondazione Italiana Linfomi centers

Patient diagnosed with lymphoma presents a greater risk of infection, mainly if undergoing anti-CD20 therapy, splenectomized, hypogammaglobulinemic. They can therefore benefit from a vaccination program, especially in the watchful waiting phases or before starting oncologic treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic has raised awareness on vaccinations in frail patients, but a homogeneous approach has yet to be achieved across different vaccinations. In this sense, FIL researchers conducted a multicenter survey to evaluate the attitude of hematologists to anamnestically evaluate the patient's vaccination history and to plan vaccinations before treatments. In this work we present the results of the survey which denote attention to the topic but not homogeneous behavior regarding the proposal and timing of vaccinations.

Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Following Late-Stage SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Purpose

To investigate the outcomes and risk factors for patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) following late-stage SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background

Patients with HM such as lymphoproliferative malignancies (including acute lymphoblastic leukemia and multiple myeloma) and myeloproliferative malignancies (including acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasm, and myelodysplastic syndrome) are at increased risk of severe illness and high mortality from COVID-19. This study examines the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection severity on HM prognosis during the late phase of COVID-19, using data from 203 patients at Shanxi Bethune Hospital.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. Data was collected from hospitalized HM patients at a single center from December 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify risk factors.

Results

This analysis includes data from 203 hospitalized patients with HM aged 36 to 67 years (median, 58 years). SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in 42.86% (87/203) of the patients, among whom severe/critical cases accounted for 14.29% (29/203). Multivariable Cox regression shows active disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-4.64, p = 0.049), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (HR 4.06, 95% CI 1.02-16.12, p = 0.047), and targeted therapy (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.23-5.50, p = 0.012) were associated with a higher incidence of progression. In contrast, individuals whose platelets count ≥50×109/L at baseline (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.78, p = 0.009) and ferritin levels less than 500 µg/L (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86, p = 0.010) were associated with a lower incidence of progression. Active status (HR 7.06, 95% CI 2.10-23.76, p = 0.002), HSCT (HR 7.17, 95% CI 1.10-46.63, p = 0.039), and severe/critical SARS-CoV-2 infection in HM patients (HR 11.98, 95% CI 2.57-55.82, p = 0.002) were associated with higher incidences of all cause of mortality. While a higher platelet level (≥50×109/L) was linked to a lower mortality (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.49, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

In the late stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, active disease status, recent HSCT, and severe/critical SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly increased the risks of disease progression and mortality in HM patients. Higher baseline platelet counts were associated with improved outcomes.

In the SARS-CoV-2 era, do we need to be afraid of obinutuzumab?

In their paper, Pinto et al. report findings from the Italian URBAN study; an ambispective, observational, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab-based therapy for advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) in routine practice. The URBAN substudy reported here examined severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outcomes in 299 patients with treatment-naïve advanced stage FL, treated with obinutuzumab-based chemoimmunotherapy and maintenance. The study began enrolling in September 2019, continuing enrolment throughout the pandemic, with cut-off for the current analysis of 31 January 2022; thus, it provides unique insights into various pandemic phases, including the impact of administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Commentary on: Pinto et al. Exposure to obinutuzumab does not affect outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:2219-2227.

SNRPB and CEP290, predicting the prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and associated with tumour immune microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most prevalent type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, exhibits significant correlations with efferocytosis-related molecules (ERMs) concerning invasion, metastasis, and clinical outcomes. This study aims to establish an efferocytosis-related gene signature specifically linked to DLBCL.

METHODS

Key module genes linked to DLBCL were identified via weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) in GSE32018. Univariate Cox analysis of GSE31312 revealed ERMs associated with DLBCL survival. Differential expression analysis identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DLBCL subtypes and normal samples. Venn diagram analysis identified common DEGs and key module genes. A DLBCL gene signature was built by using univariate Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis. Gene functional enrichment, immune microenvironment, and immunotherapy analyses compared two risk subgroups. Prognostic gene expression was validated at the single-cell level.

RESULTS

In the GSE32018 dataset, 1760 key module genes related to DLBCL were identified. Using GSE31312, 14 ERMs associated with DLBCL prognosis were determined.Then, an ERMs-related prognostic signature, including small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptides B (SNRPB) and centrosomal protein 290 (CEP290), was established. Independent prognostic analysis showed that the RiskScore derived from this signature was a prognostic factor. Significant immune microenvironment differences were observed between two risk subgroups. Additionally, chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity results indicated the signature could predict therapeutic response. Eventually, expression of SNRPB and CEP290 was confirmed in B cells.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic signature comprised of SNRPB and CEP290 based on ERMs-DEGs was established, providing a theoretical basis and reference value for DLBCL research.

Clinical Features and Prognosis of Patients with COVID-19 and B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Purpose

There is a lack of real-world data on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, treatment effects, and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors of COVID-19 in patients with B-NHL.

Patients and Methods

This study included individuals diagnosed with B-NHL who were also diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized. A retrospective analysis was conducted, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent factors affecting the duration of the positive-to-negative transition of COVID-19 nucleic acid test results and prognoses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess diagnostic accuracy and determine the optimal threshold.

Results

Among 80 patients with COVID-19 and B-NHL, relapsed or refractory lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) accounted for 13.8% and 65% of cases, respectively. The mean age was 60.4 ± 13.0 years, and 50% of patients were women. The median duration of the positive-to-negative transition was 14 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17.2), and the median hospitalization duration was 12 days (IQR, 13). The rate of severe disease was 26.25%, and the 28-day mortality rate was 10.00%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that pathological classification of B-NHL, infection with COVID-19 within 3 months after the last dose of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and corticosteroid use were independent factors associated with a prolonged duration of the positive-to-negative transition. Compared with patients with DLBCL or FL and COVID-19, patients with B-NHL had longer nucleic acid test transition durations and higher rates of severe disease and mortality.

Conclusion

In patients with B-NHL, infection with COVID-19 within 3 months after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies prolonged the positive-to-negative transition of nucleic acid test results and increased the risks of severe disease and 28-day mortality. Treatment with corticosteroids further prolonged this transition.

The evaluation of risk factors for prolonged viral shedding during anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and long-term administration of antivirals in COVID-19 patients with B-cell lymphoma treated by anti-CD20 antibody

BACKGROUND

The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. Immunocompromised patients, particularly those treated for B-cell lymphoma, have shown an increased risk of persistent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and severe outcomes and mortality. Multi-mutational SARS-CoV-2 variants can arise during the course of such persistent cases of COVID-19. No optimal, decisive strategy is currently available for patients with persistent infection that allows clinicians to sustain viral clearance, determine optimal timing to stop treatment, and prevent virus reactivation. We introduced a novel treatment combining antivirals, neutralizing antibodies, and genomic analysis with frequent monitoring of spike-specific antibody and viral load for immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19 infection. The aim of this retrospective study was to report and evaluate the efficacy of our novel treatment for immunocompromised B-cell lymphoma patients with persistent COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive analysis had no controls. Patients with B-cell lymphoma previously receiving immunotherapy including anti-CD20 antibodies, diagnosed as having COVID-19 infection, and treated in our hospital after January 2022 were included. We selected anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies according to subvariants. Every 5 days, viral load was tested by RT-PCR, with antivirals continued until viral shedding was confirmed. Primary outcome was virus elimination. Independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding time were determined by multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received rituximab, 19 obinutuzumab, and 26 bendamustine. Median treatment duration was 10 (IQR, 10-20) days; 22 patients received combination antiviral therapy. COVID-19 was severe in 16 patients, and critical in 2. All patients survived, with viral shedding confirmed at median 28 (IQR, 19-38) days. Bendamustine use or within 1 year of last treatment for B-cell lymphoma, and multiple treatment lines for B-cell lymphoma significantly prolonged time to viral shedding.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 44 consecutive patients treated, anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and long-term administration of antiviral drugs, switching, and combination therapy resulted in virus elimination and 100% survival. Bendamustine use, within 1 year of last treatment for B-cell lymphoma, and multiple treatment lines for B-cell lymphoma were the significant independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding time.

Local radiotherapy and measurable residual disease-driven immunotherapy in patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma (FIL MIRO): final results of a prospective, multicentre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The mainstay of treatment for early-stage follicular lymphoma is local radiotherapy, with a possible role for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb). We aimed to evaluate the effect of these treatments using a measurable residual disease (MRD)-driven approach.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre, phase 2 trial was conducted at 27 centres of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) in Italy. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed follicular lymphoma (stage I or II; grade I-IIIa). Patients were initially treated with 24 Gy involved-field radiotherapy over 12 days; those who were MRD-positive after radiotherapy or during follow-up received eight intravenous doses (1000 mg per dose; one dose per week) of the anti-CD20 mAb ofatumumab. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were MRD-positive after involved-field radiotherapy and became MRD-negative after ofatumumab treatment. Patients were included in the primary endpoint analysis population if they were positive for BCL2::IGH rearrangement at enrolment in peripheral blood or bone marrow samples. MRD positivity was defined as the persistence of BCL2::IGH rearrangement in peripheral blood or bone marrow, assessed centrally by laboratories of the FIL MRD Network. The trial was registered with EudraCT, 2012-001676-11.

FINDINGS

Between May 2, 2015, and June 1, 2018, we enrolled 110 participants, of whom 106 (96%) were eligible and received involved-field radiotherapy. Of these, 105 (99%) were White, one (1%) was Black, 50 (47%) were male, and 56 (53%) were female. Of 105 participants in whom BCL2::IGH status was evaluable, 32 (30%) had a detectable BCL2::IGH rearrangement at baseline. After radiotherapy, 12 (40%) of 30 patients reached MRD-negative status, which was long-lasting (at least 36 or 42 months) in three (25%). In those who were MRD-positive after radiotherapy, ofatumumab induced MRD-negativity in 23 (92%; 95% CI 74-99) of 25 evaluable patients. After a median follow-up of 46·1 months (IQR 42·8-50·8), 14 (61%) of these 23 patients remain in complete response and are MRD-negative. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were infusion-related reactions, observed in four patients.

INTERPRETATION

Local radiotherapy is frequently not associated with the eradication of follicular lymphoma. An MRD-driven, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody consolidation enables molecular remission to be reached in almost all patients and is associated with a reduced incidence of relapse over time. A clinical advantage of an MRD-driven consolidation is therefore suggested.

FUNDING

AIRC Foundation for Cancer Research in Italy, Novartis International, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Managing and treating COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies: a narrative review and expert insights

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) are at a significantly higher risk of contracting COVID-19 and experiencing severe outcomes compared to individuals without HMs. This heightened risk is influenced by various factors, including the underlying malignancy, immunosuppressive treatments, and patient-related factors. Notably, immunosuppressive regimens commonly used for HM treatment can lead to the depletion of B cells and T cells, which is associated with increased COVID-19-related complications and mortality in these patients. As the pandemic transitions into an endemic state, it remains crucial to acknowledge and address the ongoing risk for individuals with HMs. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence to enhance our understanding of the impact of HMs on COVID-19 risks and outcomes, identify particularly vulnerable individuals, and emphasize the need for specialized clinical attention and management. Furthermore, the impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination observed in these patients underscores the importance of implementing additional mitigation strategies. This may include targeted prophylaxis and treatment with antivirals and monoclonal antibodies as indicated. To provide practical guidance and considerations, we present two illustrative cases to highlight the real-life challenges faced by physicians caring for patients with HMs, emphasizing the need for individualized management based on disease severity, type, and the unique circumstances of each patient.

Management of vaccinations in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Vaccinations are fundamental tools in preventing infectious diseases, especially in immunocompromised patients like those affected by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). The COVID-19 pandemic made clinicians increasingly aware of the importance of vaccinations in preventing potential life-threatening SARS-CoV-2-related complications in NHL patients. However, several studies have confirmed a significant reduction in vaccine-induced immune responses after anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment, thus underscoring the need for refined immunization strategies in NHL patients. In this review, we summarize the existing data about COVID-19 and other vaccine's efficacy in patients with NHL and propose multidisciplinary team-based recommendations for the management of vaccines in this specific group of patients.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lymphoma incidence and short-term survival - a Swedish Lymphoma Register Study

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic posed a large challenge for healthcare systems across the world. Comprehensive data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence and mortality in lymphoma are lacking.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Using data from the Swedish lymphoma register, we compare incidence and 1-year survival of lymphoma patients in Sweden before (2017-2019) and during the pandemic (2020 and 2021).

RESULTS

Fewer patients were diagnosed with lymphomas during March-June 2020, but the annual incidence rates for 2020 and 2021 were similar to those of 2017-2019. A larger proportion of patients presented with stage IV disease during 2021. There were no differences in other base-line characteristics nor application of active treatment in pre-pandemic and pandemic years. One-year overall survival was not inferior among lymphoma patients during the pandemic years compared to pre-pandemic years i.e., 2017-2019.

INTERPRETATION

The COVID-19 pandemic had limited impact on the incidence and mortality of lymphoma in Sweden.

Treatment-Related Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients Treated for Lymphoid Malignancies in the Pre-Omicron Era-A Study of KroHem, the Croatian Group for Hematologic Diseases

Patients with lymphoid malignancies are at increased risk of death or prolonged infection due to COVID-19. Data on the influence of different antineoplastic treatment modalities on outcomes are conflicting. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies increase the risk of prolonged infection. It is unclear whether this risk is affected by the choice of the antibody (rituximab vs. obinutuzumab). To elucidate the role of antineoplastic therapy on COVID-19 outcomes, KroHem collected data on patients with lymphoid malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 between October 2020 and April 2021. A total of 314 patients were identified, 75 untreated, 61 off treatment and 178 on treatment. The mortality rate in untreated and off-treatment patients was 15% and 16%; 9% and 10% had prolonged infection. In the on-treatment group, 3% were still prolonged positive at time of data collection, 62% recovered and 35% died; 42% had prolonged infection. Disease type, use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, prior autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and line of treatment did not significantly affect mortality. Mortality was higher in older patients (p = 0.0078) and those treated with purine analogues (p = 0.012). Prolonged COVID-19 was significantly more frequent in patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (p = 0.012), especially obinutuzumab, and purine analogues (p = 0.012). Age, prior ASCT and treatment line did not significantly affect risk of prolonged infection. These data suggest that increased age and use of purine analogues are main risk factors for increased mortality of COVID-19 in patients with lymphoid malignancies. Obinutuzumab further increases the risk of prolonged disease, but not of death, in comparison to rituximab. Epidemiological considerations should be taken into account when choosing the appropriate antineoplastic therapy for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and its influencing factors in lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

The ability of generating effective humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been clarified in lymphoma patients. The study aimed to investigate the antibody (Ab) production after SARS-Cov-2 infection and clarify the factors affecting the Ab generation in these patients.

PATIENTS & METHODS

80 lymphoma patients and 51 healthy controls were included in this prospective observational study. Clinical factors and treatment regimens affecting Ab positive rate (APR) and Ab levels were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

The anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG APR and Ab levels in lymphoma patients were significantly lower than those in healthy controls. Lymphoma patients with COVID-19 vaccination had significantly higher APR and Ab levels compared with those without vaccination. Additionally, the use of dexamethasone for COVID-19 treatment had a negative impact on Ab levels. For the impact of treatment regimens on the APR and Ab levels, the results showed that patients treated with ≥ 6 times CD20 monoclonal Ab (mAb) and patients treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prior to infection produced a statistically lower APR and Ab levels compared with those treated with 1-5 times CD20 mAb and those treated without ASCT, respectively. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis indicated that the number of anti-CD20 treatment was an independent predictor for both APR and Ab levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection was impaired in lymphoma patients partly due to anti-CD20 and ASCT treatment. COVID-19 vaccination may be more needed for these patients.

Outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with lymphomas participating in registered clinical trials: A real-world study from China in the Omicron outbreak era

BACKGROUND

This real-world study investigated the outcome of COVID-19 in lymphoma patients participating in registered clinical trials and explored potential risk factors with the outcome of COVID-19 during the first wave of the Omicron outbreak in China.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients participating in registered clinical trials and diagnosed with COVID-19 in our center between December 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023, were included.

RESULTS

Four (3.6%) patients were identified as severe COVID-19 and 2 (1.8%) as critical COVID-19, respectively. The mortality rate observed was 2.73% for the entire cohort, 33.3% for the severe/critical COVID-19 group, and 18.8% for the hospitalized group. The 90-day OS was 98.2% for the entire cohort, 66.7% for the severe/critical COVID-19 group, and 87.5% for the hospitalized group. Advanced age (≥70 years), comorbidities, and PI3K inhibitor-containing regimen were significantly associated with the severity of COVID-19. Patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas were less likely to be hospitalized for COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

This study reported similar clinical features of COVID-19 in our cohort with that of non-hematological malignancy (HM) patients, while the proportion of severe/critical COVID-19 and the mortality rate were relatively higher than non-HM patients. Our findings provided valuable experience to aid clinical researchers with managing lymphoma patients participating in registered clinical trials during the ongoing pandemic of the Omicron variant.

Clinical analysis of prolonged viral clearance time in patients with lymphoma combined with novel coronavirus infection

Objective: To compare the period of viral clearance and its influencing factors after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection between patients with lymphoma and lung cancer. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with lymphoma and lung cancer (118 cases) diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between 1 December 2022, and 15 March 2023. Finally, 87 patients with prolonged virus clearance times were included and divided into lymphoma (40 cases) and lung cancer (47 cases) groups. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to draw a negative turn curve. We performed a univariate analysis of the prolongation of virus clearance time and a Cox regression model for multivariate analysis. Results: The median times for viral clearance in the lung cancer and lymphoma groups were 18 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.112-20.888) and 32 (95%CI 27.429-36.571) days, respectively. Log-rank analysis showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.048), and the lymphocyte count in the lymphoma group was lower than that in the lung cancer group (p = 0.044). We used the Cox regression model to conduct a multivariate analysis, which revealed that in lymphoma patients, the interval between the time of diagnosis and the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection <24 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.182, 95%CI: 0.062-0.535, p = 0.02), an interval between the last anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment and the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection of <2 months (HR: 0.101, 95%CI: 0.029-0.358, p < 0.001), and a decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte levels (HR: 0.380, 95%CI: 0.179-0.808, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for prolonged viral clearance time. Conclusion: Patients with lymphoma combined with SARS-CoV-2 infection had a longer virus clearance time than did patients with lung cancer. Moreover, the lymphocyte count in the lymphoma group was lower than that in the lung cancer group; therefore, the immune status of patients with lymphoma is lower than that of patients with lung cancer. An interval between lymphoma diagnosis and SARS-CoV-2 infection of <2 years, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment within the past 2 months, and a decrease in lymphocyte levels in the peripheral blood prolonged the virus clearance time in the patients in this study.

Impact of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies in the management of patients with lymphoma and COVID19: A retrospective study

COVID19 in patients affected by lymphoma represents an important challenge because of the higher mortality rate. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (anti-S MoAbs) appear promising in this setting. We report a monocentric retrospective study including 176 patients affected by lymphoma which developed SARS-CoV-2 infection since the start of COVID19 pandemic. Overall, mortality was 13.1%, with a decreasing trend between first waves to the last wave of pandemic (18.5% vs. 9.4%, p 0.076). Patients receiving anti-S MoAbs (41.3%) showed inferior mortality rate (overall survival, OS 93.2% vs. 82.7%, p 0.025) with no serious toxicity, reduced documented pneumonia (26% vs. 33%, p 0.005), and reduced need of oxygen support (14.5% vs. 35.7%, p 0.003). Among patients who received 3 doses of vaccine, the employment of anti-COVID MoAbs showed a trend of superior survival versus those who did not receive Anti-S MoAbs (OS rates 97.3% vs. 84.2%, p 0.064). On multivariate analysis, active haematological disease (OS 72% (HR 2.49 CI 1.00-6.41), bendamustine exposure (OS 60% HR 4.2 CI 1.69-10.45) and at least one comorbidity (HR 6.53 CI 1.88-22.60) were independent prognostic factors for death. Our study confirms the adverse prognostic role of COVID-19 in lymphoma patients in presence of active disease, comorbidities and previous exposure to bendamustine. In our experience, anti-S MoAbs represented a therapeutic option in vaccinated patients.

Rituximab versus obinutuzumab-based first-line chemoimmunotherapy for follicular lymphoma-a real-world multicenter retrospective cohort study

The GALLIUM study showed a progression-free survival advantage of 7% in favor of obinutuzumab vs. rituximab-based immunochemotherapies as first-line therapy in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Yet, the toxicity appears to be increased with obinutuzumab-based therapy. This is a multicenter retrospective-cohort study including adult FL patients comparing the toxicity of first-line rituximab vs. obinutuzumab-based chemo-immunotherapies (R and O groups, respectively). We compared the best standard-of-care therapy used per time period, before and after obinutuzumab approval. The primary outcome was any infection during induction and 6 months post-induction. Secondary outcomes included rates of febrile neutropenia, severe and fatal infections, other adverse events, and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 156 patients were included in the analysis, 78 patients per group. Most patients received bendamustine (59%) or CHOP (31.4%) as adjacent chemotherapy. Half of the patients received growth-factor prophylaxis. Overall, 69 patients (44.2%) experienced infections, and a total of 106 infectious episodes were recorded. Patients in the R and O groups had similar rates of any infection (44.8% and 43.5%, p = 1), severe infections (43.3% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.844), febrile neutropenia (15% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.606), and treatment discontinuation, as well as similar types of infections. No covariate was associated with infection in multivariable analysis. No statistically significant difference was evident in adverse events of grades 3-5 (76.9% vs. 82%, p = 0.427). To conclude, in this largest real-life study of first-line treated FL patients comparing R- to O-based therapy, we did not observe any difference in toxicity during the induction and 6 months post-induction period.

COVID-19 in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancies-Lessons Learned after Three Years of Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic is undoubtedly the most difficult health challenge of the 21st century with more than 600 million laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and over 6.5 million deaths worldwide. The coronavirus pandemic contributed to rapid development of mRNA vaccines, which, along with new antiviral drugs, have been the subject of extensive research for many decades. Nevertheless, elderly, multi-morbid and immunocompromised patients continue to face a more severe clinical course and a higher risk of death from COVID-19, even now that the risk of COVID-19 in the general population is significantly reduced due to the introduction of global vaccination strategies. In this paper, we present the mechanisms of increased susceptibility to infectious complications and the evolution of the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies, taking into account the mutation of the virus and the introduction of vaccines and new antiviral drugs. We also present current recommendations for prophylactic and therapeutic management in patients with hematological malignancies.

Efficacy, safety, and molecular response predictors of oral ixazomib and short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL

Patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) generally require treatment but experience normal survival, emphasizing the need for simpler, safer therapies. Proteasome inhibitors target aberrant signaling pathways within iNHL and have manageable toxicities. We evaluated the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib as initial monotherapy, and combined with rituximab, for first-line treatment of iNHL. Treatment-naïve patients with iNHL needing therapy received oral ixazomib 4 mg weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events. A 4-week course of rituximab was added during month 7. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) during the ixazomib monotherapy window. Correlations included gene expression profiling and response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Thirty-three patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 20), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 7), and other iNHL were treated with a median follow-up of 30.3 months. During the 6-month ixazomib window, the ORR was 24%, including 35% in FL. The best ORR over the entire study period was 52% overall and 65% in FL; complete response was achieved in 33% and 45%, respectively. The median duration of response was 25.8 months (range, 0-49.7), and the 24-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-67) and 91% (95% CI, 74-97), respectively. Ixazomib was well tolerated. Baseline downregulation of proteasome genes, PSMB9 (P = .03) and PSMB8 (P = .007), were associated with response. All evaluated patients generated anti-S antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with a median of 254.9 binding arbitrary unit per mL. Ixazomib demonstrated efficacy alone and with short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL while exhibiting favorable toxicity, convenience, and retention of the B-cell immune response. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02339922.

Cancer, more than a “COVID-19 co-morbidity”

Patients with cancer represent a particularly vulnerable population at risk of adverse outcomes related to COVID-19. Collectively, the initial studies, including patients with and without cancer, confirmed that patients with cancer had a higher risk of complications and death related to COVID-19. Subsequent studies on patients with COVID-19 and cancer investigated patient and disease-related factors associated with COVID-19 severity and morality. Multiple interconnected factors include demographics, comorbidities, cancer-associated variables, treatment side effects, and other parameters. However, there is a lack of clarity on the contributions of any one factor. In this commentary, we deconvolute the data of specific risk factors associated with worse outcomes due to COVID-19 in cancer patients and focus on understanding the recommended guidelines to mitigate COVID-19 risk in this vulnerable population. In the first section, we highlight the key parameters, including age and race, cancer status, type of malignancy, cancer therapy, smoking status and comorbidities that impact outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19. Next, we discuss efforts made at the patient, health system, and population levels to mitigate the effects of the ongoing outbreak for patients with cancer, including (1) screening, barrier and isolation strategies (2), Masking/PPE (3), vaccination, and (4) systemic therapies (e.g., evusheld) to prevent disease onset in patients. In the last section, we discuss optimal treatment strategies for COVID-19, including additional therapies for patients with COVID-19 and cancer. Overall, this commentary focuses on articles with high yield and impact on understanding the evolving evidence of risk factors and management guidelines in detail. We also emphasize the ongoing collaboration between clinicians, researchers, health system administrators and policymakers and how its role will be important in optimizing care delivery strategies for patients with cancer. Creative patient-centered solutions will be critical in the coming years, post the pandemic.

B-cell malignancies and COVID-19: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has been extensively characterized in immunocompetent hosts and to a lesser extent in immunocompromised populations. Among the latter, patients treated for B-cell malignancies have immunosuppression generated by B-cell lymphodepletion/aplasia resulting in an increased susceptibility to respiratory virus infections and poor response to vaccination. The consequence is that these patients are likely to develop severe or critical COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the overall impact of COVID-19 in patients treated for a B-cell malignancy or receiving chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) immunotherapy administered in case of relapsed or refractory disease.

SOURCES

We searched in the MEDLINE database to identify relevant studies, trials, reviews, or meta-analyses focusing on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COVID-19 management in patients treated for a B-cell malignancy or recipients of CAR-T cell therapy up to 8 July 2022.

CONTENT

The epidemiology and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with B-cell malignancy and CAR-T cell recipients are summarized. Vaccine efficacy in these subgroups is compiled. Considering the successive surges of variants of concern, we propose a critical appraisal of treatment strategies by discussing the use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma therapy, direct-acting antiviral drugs, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators.

IMPLICATIONS

For patients with B-cell malignancy, preventive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains essential and the management of COVID-19 includes control of viral replication because of protracted SARS-CoV-2 shedding. Passive immunotherapy (monoclonal neutralizing antibody therapy and convalescent plasma therapy) and direct-active antivirals, such as remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir are the best currently available treatments. Real-world data and subgroup analyses in larger trials are warranted to assess COVID-19 therapeutics in B-cell depleted populations.

Reply to "successful early use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infected hematological patients-A Czech multicenter experience": A case series of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection and aggressive lymphoma in the Sotrovimab era

A prospective multicentre experience of early administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MA) with efficacy among patients with hematological malignancies and early-stage COVID- 19 was reported by Weinbergerová et al. The study validated the safety and efficacy of MA early use among hematological patients with newly diagnosed early-stage COVID-19 in terms of alleviating infection course and decreasing mortality. However no reference to new variant (Delta and Omicron) or other MA (e.g., Sotrovimab) has been reported. We reported our monocentric experience of 8 aggressive lymphoma patients with Omicron infection, 7 of whom treated with this MA in our Institution between December 2021 and February 2022. Among the patients treated with Sotrovimab nobody experienced neither SARS-CoV2 reactivation, nor other infectious events. One patients on active lymphoma treatment was hospitalized for pneumonia and treated with remdesivir. In 4/8 patients negativization of molecular swab occurred concomitantly to symptoms resolution with a median of 5.25 days, while the other 4 patients remained persistently positive with a median of 26.3 days. In this group, in order to maintain the chemo/chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT) dose-density, lymphoma treatment was reassumed independently on molecular swab analysis. SARS-CoV-2 negativization occurred with a median of 7.7 days after the resumption of CT/CIT. The one patient treated with remdesivir, although still positive to molecular swab, restarted R-COMP regimen at symptoms resolution too, but experienced an Omicron pneumonia exacerbation. This is the first case series reported in literature of patients affected by Omicron variant in which Sotrovimab seems to provide a resolution of COVID-19 disease, even in patient with molecular swab positive persistence too. Patients with aggressive lymphoma histologies should not be deprived of the best available treatment of their disease after sotrovimab administration, even in the presence of a still positive Omicron swab.

Management of patients with lymphoma and COVID-19: Narrative review and evidence-based practical recommendations

Patients with hematologic malignancies can be immunocompromized because of their disease, anti-cancer therapy, and concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. Furthermore, these patients are usually older than 60 years and have comorbidities. For all these reasons they are highly vulnerable to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and have an increased risk of developing severe/critical Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the general population. Although COVID-19 vaccination has proven effective in reducing the incidence of severe/critical disease, vaccinated patients with lymphoma may not be protected as they often fail to develop a sufficient antiviral immune response. There is therefore an urgent need to address the management of patients with lymphoma and COVID-19 in the setting of the ongoing pandemic. Passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is a currently available complementary drug strategy to active vaccination for lymphoma patients, while monoclonal antibodies and antiviral drugs (remdesivir, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, and molnupiravir) have proven effective in preventing the progression to severe/critical COVID-19. In this narrative review we present the most recent data documenting the characteristics and outcomes of patients with concomitant lymphoma and COVID-19. Our ultimate goal is to provide practice-oriented guidance in the management of these vulnerable patients from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up of lymphoma. To this purpose, we will first provide an overview of the main data concerning prognostic factors and fatality rate of lymphoma patients who develop COVID-19; the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination will also be addressed. We will then discuss current COVID-19 prophylaxis and treatment options for lymphoma patients. Finally, based on the literature and our multidisciplinary experience, we will summarize a set of indications on how to manage patients with lymphoma according to COVID-19 exposure, level of disease severity and former history of infection, as typically encountered in clinical practice.

Predictors of clinical evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematological patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Main aim of this systematic review is to quantify the risk and identify predictors of clinical evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in hematological patients compared to different control populations. Two independent reviewers screened the literature assessing clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult patients with active hematological malignancies published up to June 2021. Primary outcome was COVID-19 related mortality, secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive-care admission, mechanical ventilation (MV), and thromboembolic events. Variables related to study setting, baseline patients' demographic, comorbidities, underlying hematological disease, ongoing chemotherapy, COVID-19 presentation, and treatments were extracted. A total of 67 studies including 10,061 hematological patients and 111,143 controls were included. Most of the studies were retrospective cohorts (51 studies, 76%) and only 19 (13%) provided data for a control group. A significant increased risk of clinical progression in the hematological population compared to the controls was found in terms of COVID-19 related mortality (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.77-2.54), hospitalization (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.15-3.43), intensive-care admission (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.38-2.26), and MV (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.71-2.75). The risk remained significantly higher in the subgroup analysis comparing hematological patients versus solid cancer. Meta-regression analysis of uncontrolled studies showed that older age, male sex, and hypertension were significantly related to worse clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in hematological population. Older age and hypertension were found to be associated also to thromboembolic events. In conclusion, hematological patients have a higher risk of COVID-19 clinical progression compared to both the general population and to patients with solid cancer.

Preserved SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing IgG activity of in-house manufactured COVID-19 convalescent plasma

PURPOSE

In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the neutralizing IgG activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as the coagulation factors of convalescent plasmas which we manufactured in-house without a fast-freezing technique.

METHODS

We collected plasmas from eligible participants who had confirmed certain titers of neutralizing antibodies. The plasmas were frozen and stored in the ordinary biofreezer without a fast-freezing function. The purified-IgG neutralizing activity of 20 samples from 19 participants and the coagulation factors of 49 samples from 40 participants were evaluated before and after freezing.

RESULTS

Purified-IgG maintained its neutralizing activities, with the median 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10.11 mg/ml (IQR 6.53-18.19) before freezing and 8.90 m g/ml (IQR 6.92-28.27) after thawing (p = 0.956). On the contrary, fibrinogen and factor Ⅷ decreased significantly after freezing and thawing in our environment. No significant temperature deviation was observed during the storage period.

CONCLUSION

Neutralizing IgG activity, which largely contributes to the antiviral activity of convalescent plasma, did not change through our in-house manufacturing, without fastfreezing and storage conditions for more than 200 days. Ordinary freezers without the fast-freezing function are suitable enough to manufacture and store convalescent plasmas. Hospitals or facilities without specified resources could easily collect and store convalescent plasmas in case of upcoming emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases on-demand with appropriate neutralizing antibody levels measurements.

Lack of efficacy of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients with concomitant hematological malignancies: An Italian retrospective study

A multicenter retrospective study was designed to assess clinical outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) following treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (CP) or standard of care therapy. To this aim, a propensity score matching was used to assess the role of non-randomized administration of CP in this high-risk cohort of patients from the Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 (ITA-HEMA-COV) project, now including 2049 untreated control patients. We investigated 30- and 90-day mortality, rate of admission to intensive care unit, proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support, hospitalization time, and SARS-CoV-2 clearance in 79 CP recipients and compared results with 158 propensity score-matched controls. Results indicated a lack of efficacy of CP in the study group compared with the untreated group, thus confirming the negative results obtained from randomized studies in immunocompetent individuals with COVID-19. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis did not meet the primary and secondary end points in any category of immunocompromized patients affected by HM.

Reply to Çınar et al. Comment on "Zamfir et al. Hematologic Malignancies Diagnosed in the Context of the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign: A Report of Two Cases. Medicina 2022, 58, 874"

We would like to thank Çınar et al. for their appreciation and insightful discussions presented in their comment [...].

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: The Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 cohort

COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, is still afflicting thousands of people across the globe. Few studies on COVID-19 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are available. Here, we analyzed data from the CLL cohort of the Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 (NCT04352556), which included 256 CLL patients enrolled between 25 February 2020 and 1 February 2021. Median age was 70 years (range 38-94) with male preponderance (60.1%). Approximately half of patients (n = 127) had received at least one line of therapy for CLL, including 108 (83.7%) who were on active treatment at the time of COVID-19 or received their last therapy within 12 months. Most patients (230/256, 89.9%) were symptomatic at COVID-19 diagnosis and the majority required hospitalization (n = 176). Overall, after a median follow-up of 42 days (IQR 24-96), case fatality rate was 30.1%, and it was 37.5% and 24.4% in the first (25 February 2020-22 June 2020) and second wave (23 June 2020-1 February 2021), respectively (p = 0.03). At multivariate analysis, male sex (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.24, p = 0.04), age over than 70 years (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.23-4.05, p = 0.01), any treatment for CLL given in the last 12 months (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.84, p = 0.04) and COVID-19 severity (severe: HR 5.66, 95% CI 2.62-12.33, p < 0.0001; critical: HR 15.99, 95% CI 6.93-36.90, p < 0.0001) were independently associated with poor survival. In summary, we report a dismal COVID-related outcome in a significant fraction of CLL patients, that can be nicely predicted by clinical parameters.

Impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection on the outcome of primary central nervous system lymphoma treatment: A study of the International PCNSL Collaborative Group

To optimise management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection identifying high-risk patients and maintaining treatment dose intensity is an important issue in patients with aggressive lymphomas. In the present study, we report on the presentation, management, and outcome of an international series of 91 patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma and SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed before/during first-line treatment in 64 patients, during follow-up in 21, and during salvage therapy in six. Among the 64 patients infected before/during first-line chemotherapy, 38 (59%) developed pneumonia and 26 (41%) did not clear the virus. Prolonged exposure to steroids before viral infection and/or treatment with high-dose cytarabine favoured pneumonia development and virus persistence and were associated with poorer survival; 81% of patients who did not clear virus died early from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccination was associated with lower pneumonia incidence and in-hospital mortality. Chemotherapy was initiated/resumed in 43 (67%) patients, more commonly among patients who did not develop pneumonia, cleared the virus, or did not receive steroids during infection. Chemotherapy resumption in patients with viral persistence should be indicated cautiously as it was associated with a poorer survival (6-month, 70% and 87%, p = 0.07). None of the 21 patients infected during follow-up died from COVID-19, requiring similar measures as infected subjects in the general population.

Outcome of COVID-19 in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma—Report From the European MCL Registry

Data on outcome of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and COVID-19 infection are limited. The European MCL (EMCL) registry is a centralized registry of the EMCL network, collecting real-world information about treatments and disease courses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, additional data on MCL patients with COVID-19 infection were collected, aiming to identify risk factors for mortality from COVID-19. In our retrospective, multicenter, international study, we collected data from 63 MCL patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 44–84) in 9 countries with evidence of a COVID-19 infection between February 2020 and October 2021. The overall mortality rate was high (44.4%), especially in hospitalized patients (61%) and in patients with need for intensive care unit care (94%). Patients receiving rituximab had significantly poorer survival than patients not receiving rituximab (P = 0.04). Our data highlight the importance of prevention strategies and underline the need for effective vaccination in this vulnerable cohort.

Impact of Hypogammaglobulinemia on the Course of COVID-19 in a Non-Intensive Care Setting: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Severity and mortality of COVID-19 largely depends on the ability of the immune system to clear the virus. Among various comorbidities potentially impacting on this process, the weight and the consequences of an antibody deficiency have not yet been clarified.

Methods

We used serum protein electrophoresis to screen for hypogammaglobulinemia in a cohort of consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalized in non-intensive care setting between December 2020 and January 2021. The disease severity, measured by a validated score and by the need for semi intensive (sICU) or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the 30-day mortality was compared between patients presenting hypogammaglobulinemia (HYPO) and without hypogammaglobulinemia (no-HYPO). Demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 specific treatment during the hospital stay, disease duration, complications and laboratory parameters were also evaluated in both groups.

Results

We enrolled 374 patients, of which 39 represented the HYPO cohort (10.4%). In 10/39 the condition was previously neglected, while in the other 29/39 hematologic malignancies were common (61.5%); 2/39 were on regular immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). Patients belonging to the HYPO group more frequently developed a severe COVID-19 and more often required sICU/ICU admission than no-HYPO patients. IgRT were administered in 8/39 during hospitalization; none of them died or needed sICU/ICU. Among HYPO cohort, we observed a significantly higher prevalence of neoplastic affections, of active oncologic treatment and bronchiectasis, together with higher prevalence of viral and bacterial superinfections, mechanical ventilation, convalescent plasma and SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies administration during hospital stay, and longer disease duration. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression confirmed the impact of hypogammaglobulinemia on the COVID-19 severity and the probability of sICU/ICU admission. The analysis of the mortality rate in the whole cohort showed no significant difference between HYPO and no-HYPO.

Conclusions

Hypogammaglobulinemia, regardless of its cause, in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a non-intensive care setting was associated to a more severe disease course and more frequent admission to s-ICU/ICU, particularly in absence of IgRT. Our findings emphasize the add-value of routine serum protein electrophoresis evaluation in patients admitted with COVID-19 to support clinicians in patient care and to consider IgRT initiation during hospitalization.

CD20-Targeted Therapy Ablates De Novo Antibody Response to Vaccination but Spares Preestablished Immunity

To obtain a deeper understanding of poor responses to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with lymphoma, we assessed blocking antibodies, total anti-spike IgG, and spike-specific memory B cells in the peripheral blood of 126 patients with lymphoma and 20 age-matched healthy controls 1 and 4 months after COVID-19 vaccination. Fifty-five percent of patients developed blocking antibodies postvaccination, compared with 100% of controls. When evaluating patients last treated from days to nearly 18 years prior to vaccination, time since last anti-CD20 was a significant independent predictor of vaccine response. None of 31 patients who had received anti-CD20 treatment within 6 months prior to vaccination developed blocking antibodies. In contrast, patients who initiated anti-CD20 treatment shortly after achieving a vaccine-induced antibody response tended to retain that response during treatment, suggesting a policy of immunizing prior to treatment whenever possible.

SIGNIFICANCE

In a large cohort of patients with B-cell lymphoma, time since anti-CD20 treatment was an independent predictor of neutralizing antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Comparing patients who received anti-CD20 treatment before or after vaccination, we demonstrate that vaccinating first can generate an antibody response that endures through anti-CD20-containing treatment. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 85.