Disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes of Hispanic adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Disparities in Clinical Trial Participation in Children and Adolescent Patients With a Hematologic Malignancy

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic groups and racial/ethnic minorities continue to experience pediatric cancer outcome disparities, and remain underrepresented in clinical trials. It is vital to understand why underrepresentation exists and to address it in order to generalize trial findings to all groups. This study examined institutional disparities in clinical trial offerings and enrollment for children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of clinical trial participation in patients less than 18 years old with newly diagnosed hematologic malignancies between 2011 and 2017. Patient demographics (e.g., parental primary language, race) were abstracted, and patient address at diagnosis was geocoded to characterize neighborhood socioeconomic status. Endpoints were frontline therapeutic clinical trial offering and enrollment. Multivariable logistic regression was constructed to examine predictors of trial enrollment.

RESULTS

Among 464 trial-eligible patients, 90.1% were offered clinical trial participation, of which 85% enrolled. There was no significant difference in enrollment by age, sex, parental primary language, neighborhood socioeconomic status, or rurality. However, non-Hispanic Black patients [OR: 0.4 (95% CI: 0.20-0.8), p = 0.01] and patients with lymphoma [OR: 0.15 (95% CI: 0.04-0.6), p = 0.01] were less likely to enroll on a clinical trial in our adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high institutional clinical trial enrollment rate for eligible patients, we found racial and disease-type disparities. Further work is needed to more granularly determine reasons for not offering trial participation or for not enrolling. By better-defining barriers to clinical trial enrollment, targeted institution-level interventions can be created to improve trial enrollment and reduce outcome disparities.

Hyper-CVAD and Modified CALGB-10403 Regimens in Adult Patients With Philadelphia-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a higher incidence in Latin America, with adult patients experiencing worse long-term outcomes despite high complete remission (CR) rates. When treated with adult regimens, 3-year overall survival (OS) is approximately 20%. However, adopting pediatric-inspired regimens (PIRs) has shown improved outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a comparative analysis of Hispanic adult patients with newly diagnosed Ph-negative ALL, treated with either a PIR, a modified CALGB 10403 (mCALGB), or the adult regimen Hyper-CVAD between January 2015 and May 2023. The primary endpoint was OS and among secondary endpoints relapse-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

We included 100 patients, 35 were treated with Hyper-CVAD and 65 with mCALGB. Median age was 26 years (range, 20.2-38). The median OS was 54.2 months (95% CI 28.3-80.1), with a non-reached median OS in the mCALGB group (95% CI NR-NR) versus 22.4 months (95% CI 13.7-31) for Hyper-CVAD. The 3-year OS was 64.9% versus 34.9%, p = 0.034. Treatment with mCALGB was independently associated with OS (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003) and RFS (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.59, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with mCALGB was independently associated with benefits regarding RFS and OS when compared to Hyper-CVAD.

Racial and ethnic associations with comprehensive cancer center access and clinical trial enrollment for acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial participation at Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) is inequitable for minoritized racial and ethnic groups with acute leukemia. CCCs care for a high proportion of adults with acute leukemia. It is unclear if participation inequities are due to CCC access, post-access enrollment, or both.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with acute leukemia (2010-2019) residing within Massachusetts, the designated catchment area of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC). Individuals were categorized as non-Hispanic Asian (NHA), Black (NHB), White (NHW), Hispanic White (HW), or Other. Decomposition analyses assessed covariate contributions to disparities in (1) access to DF/HCC care and (2) post-access enrollment.

RESULTS

Of 3698 individuals with acute leukemia, 85.9% were NHW, 4.5% HW, 4.3% NHB, 3.7% NHA, and 1.3% Other. Access was lower for HW (age- and sex-adjusted OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.90) and reduced post-access enrollment for HW (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI =0.34 to 0.86) and NHB (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.92) compared to NHW. Payor and socioeconomic status (SES) accounted for 25.2% and 21.2% of the +1.1% absolute difference in HW access. Marital status and SES accounted for 8.0% and 7.0% of the -8.8% absolute disparity in HW enrollment; 76.4% of the disparity was unexplained. SES and marital status accounted for 8.2% and 7.1% of the -9.1% absolute disparity in NHB enrollment; 73.0% of the disparity was unexplained.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of racial and ethnic inequities in acute leukemia trial enrollment at CCCs are from post-access enrollment, the majority of which was not explained by sociodemographic factors.

Characteristics of Health Care Settings Where Adolescents and Young Adults Receive Care for ALL

PURPOSE

Individuals diagnosed with cancer between 15 and 39 years (adolescent and young adult [AYA]) face unique vulnerability. Detail is lacking about care delivery for these patients, especially those with ALL. We address these knowledge gaps by describing AYA ALL care delivery details at National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) (sub)affiliates by model of care.

METHODS

Participating institutions treated at least one AYA with ALL from 2012 to 2016. Study-specific criteria were used to determine the number of unique clinical facilities (CFs) per NCORP and their model of care (adult/internal medicine [IM], pediatric, mixed [both]). Surveys completed by NCORPs for each CF by model of care captured size, resources, services, and communication.

RESULTS

Among 84 participating CFs (adult/IM, n=47; pediatric, n=15; mixed, n=24), 34% treated 5-10 AYAs with ALL annually; adult/IM CFs more often treated <5 (adult/IM, 60%; pediatric, 40%; mixed, 29%). Referral decisions were commonly driven by an age/diagnosis combination (58%), with frequent ALL-specific age minimums (87%) or maximums (80%). Medical, navigational, and social work services were similar across models while psychology was available at more pediatric CFs (pediatric, 80%; adult/IM, 40%; mixed, 46%-54%). More pediatric or mixed CFs reported oncologists interacting with pediatric/adult counterparts via tumor boards (pediatric, 93%; adult/IM, 26%; mixed, 96%) or initiating contact (pediatric, 100%; adult/IM, 77%; mixed 96%); more pediatric CFs reported an affiliated counterpart (pediatric, 53%; adult, 19%). Most CFs reported no AYA-specific resources (79%) or meetings (83%-98%).

CONCLUSION

System-level aspects of AYA ALL care delivery have not been examined previously. At NCORPs, these characteristics differ by models of care. Additional work is ongoing to investigate the impact of these facility-level factors on guideline-concordant care in this population. Together, these findings can inform a system-level intervention for diverse practice settings.

Real-World Outcomes of Adolescents and Young Adults with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are typically treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). However, a standard of care for managing adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with DLBCL is lacking. We examine treatment approaches and outcomes of this population. Methods: We included 90 AYAs (15-39 years) diagnosed with DLBCL between 2008 and 2018 in three tertiary centers in Peru. Overall response rates (ORR) were available for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 33 years, 57% were males, 57% had good performance status (Lansky/Karnofsky ≥90), and 61% were diagnosed with early-stage disease (Ann Arbor stages I-II). R-CHOP (n = 69, 77%) was the most frequently used first-line regimen, with an ORR of 91%. With a median follow-up of 83 months, the 5-year OS and PFS among all patients were 79% and 67%, respectively. Among the patients who received R-CHOP, the 5-year OS and PFS were 77% and 66%, respectively. Of the 29 (32%) patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, 83% received second-line treatment and only 14% underwent consolidation therapy with autologous transplantation. The 3-year OS for R/R DLBCL was 36%. Conclusion: Our data show that AYAs with DLBCL who received conventional therapy had comparable outcomes to those observed in studies conducted among the adult population. However, the prognosis for AYAs with R/R disease was dismal, indicating the unmet need for developing and increasing access to novel treatment modalities in AYAs.

BIPOC experiences of (anti-)racist patient engagement in adolescent and young adult oncology research: an electronic Delphi study

Aims: To characterize Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients' experiences of patient engagement in AYA oncology and derive best practices that are co-developed by BIPOC AYAs and oncology professionals. Materials & methods: Following a previous call to action from AYA oncology professionals, a panel of experts composed exclusively of BIPOC AYA cancer patients (n = 32) participated in an electronic Delphi study. Results: Emergent themes described BIPOC AYA cancer patients' direct experiences and consensus opinion on recommendations to advance antiracist patient engagement from BIPOC AYA cancer patients and oncology professionals. Conclusion: The findings reveal high-priority practices across all phases of research and are instructional for advancing health equity.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Approach to Older Adults With Phildadelphia-Chromosome Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Philadelphia-chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has historically been associated with poor outcomes in older patients due to adverse disease biology, as well as inferior tolerance of conventional chemotherapy. Fortunately, novel therapies, including inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and venetoclax, are now being incorporated into first-line therapy to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of initial therapy. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, alone or in combination with low intensity chemotherapy, appears to be best suited for the induction phase of treatment due to efficacy in the setting of high tumor burden. In contrast, blinatumomab may be best suited for consolidation due to superior efficacy in setting of morphologic remission, with or without measurable residual disease (MRD). Venetoclax is being investigated in combination with chemotherapy and can be used for treatment of older adults with both B-cell and T-cell ALL. Ongoing trials incorporating inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and venetoclax demonstrate high rates of MRD-negative complete remissions with low early mortality. Long-term outcomes have been less favorable so far, with several trials reporting nonrelapse mortality during subsequent treatment. Unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL, including central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, the most appropriate consolidation to minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy, and the role of transplant and cellular therapy. T-cell ALL remains an area of unmet need and effort is required to ensure that therapeutic advances benefit all populations equitably. In this manuscript, we review current data and ongoing trials regarding the treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL and define topics for further research.

Transcriptome Analysis in Mexican Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents around 25% of adult acute leukemias. Despite the increasing improvement in the survival rate of ALL patients during the last decade, the heterogeneous clinical and molecular features of this malignancy still represent a major challenge for treatment and achieving better outcomes. To identify aberrantly expressed genes in bone marrow (BM) samples from adults with ALL, transcriptomic analysis was performed using Affymetrix Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (HTA 2.0). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (±2-fold change, p-value < 0.05, and FDR < 0.05) were detected using the Transcriptome Analysis Console. Gene Ontology (GO), Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID), and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) were employed to identify gene function and define the enriched pathways of DEGs. The protein-protein interactions (PPIs) of DEGs were constructed. A total of 871 genes were differentially expressed, and DNTT, MYB, EBF1, SOX4, and ERG were the top five up-regulated genes. Meanwhile, the top five down-regulated genes were PTGS2, PPBP, ADGRE3, LUCAT1, and VCAN. An association between ERG, CDK6, and SOX4 expression levels and the probability of relapse and death was observed. Regulation of the immune system, immune response, cellular response to stimulus, as well as apoptosis signaling, inflammation mediated by chemokines and cytokines, and T cell activation were among the most altered biological processes and pathways, respectively. Transcriptome analysis of ALL in adults reveals a group of genes consistently associated with hematological malignancies and underscores their relevance in the development of ALL in adults.

Socioeconomic determinants of the biology and outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

ABSTRACT

Various socioeconomic and biologic factors affect cancer health disparities and differences in health outcomes. To better characterize the socioeconomic vs biologic determinants of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) outcomes, we conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of adult patients with ALL treated at the University of Chicago (UChicago) from 2010 to 2022 and compared our outcomes with the US national data (the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] database). Among 221 adult patients with ALL treated at UChicago, BCR::ABL1 was more frequent in patients with higher body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR], 7.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-49.9) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) ancestry (59% vs 24% in non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 20% in Hispanic patients; P = .001). In a multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 6.93; 95% CI, 2.27-21.1) and higher BMI at diagnosis (HR, 10.3; 95% CI, 2.56-41.5) were independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS). In contrast, race or income were not predictors of OS in the UChicago cohort. Analysis of the national SEER database (2010-2020) demonstrated worse survival outcomes in Hispanic and NHB patients than in NHW patients among adolescent and young adults (AYAs) but not in older adults (aged >40 years). Both AYA and older adult patients with higher median household income had better OS than those with lower income. Therefore, multidisciplinary medical care coupled with essential supportive care services offered at centers experienced in ALL care may alleviate the socioeconomic disparities in ALL outcomes in the United States.

Impact of Specialized Treatment Setting on Survival in Adolescent and Young Adult ALL

PURPOSE

Unlike children with ALL who receive cancer care primarily at specialized cancer centers (SCCs; National Cancer Institute and/or Children's Oncology Group centers), adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years) receive care in a variety of settings. Using population-based data, we describe where AYAs with ALL receive treatment and determine associations with overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Data from the 2004 to 2018 California (CA, n = 2,283), New York (NY, n = 795), and Texas (TX, n = 955) state cancer registries were used to identify treatment setting of AYAs with newly diagnosed ALL. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated associations with OS.

RESULTS

Seventy percent were older than 18 years, and 65% were male. A majority in CA (63%) and TX (64%) were Hispanic while most in NY were non-Hispanic White (50%). Treatment at an SCC occurred in 48.2% (CA), 44.4% (NY), and 19.5% (TX). Across states, AYAs who were older or uninsured were less likely to receive treatment at an SCC. Treatment at an SCC was associated with superior OS in CA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.85) and TX (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.83); a nonsignificant association was seen in NY (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.08).

CONCLUSION

Only 20%-50% of AYA patients with ALL received frontline treatment at SCCs. Treatment of ALL at an SCC was associated with superior survival, highlighting the importance of policy efforts to improve access and reduce inequities in AYA ALL care.

Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Clinical Trials in Underrepresented Populations: A Multicenter Cohort Study of Pediatric and Young Adult Acute Lymphobastic Leukemia Patients

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is a promising approach to improve survival for children and adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but these clinical trials might not be equally accessible to patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) or to patients from racial or ethnic minority groups. We sought to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients enrolled in CAR-T clinical trials and to compare these characteristics to those of other patients with r/r B-ALL. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study at 5 pediatric consortium sites to compare the sociodemographic characteristics of patients treated and enrolled in CAR-T trials at their home institution, other patients with r/r B-ALL treated at these sites, and patients referred from an external hospital for CAR-T trials. The patients were age 0 to 27 years with r/r B-ALL treated at 1 of the consortium sites between 2012 and 2018. Clinical and demographic data were collected from the electronic health record. We calculated distance from home to treating institution and assigned SES scores based on census tract. Among the 337 patients treated for r/r B-ALL, 112 were referred from an external hospital to a consortium site and enrolled in a CAR-T trial and 225 were treated primarily at a consortium site, with 34% enrolled in a CAR-T trial. Patients treated primarily at a consortium site had similar characteristics regardless of trial enrollment. Lower proportions of Hispanic patients (37% versus 56%; P = .03), patients whose preferred language was Spanish (8% versus 22%; P = .006), and publicly insured patients (38% versus 65%; P = .001) were referred from an external hospital than were treated primarily at a consortium site and enrolled in a CAR-T trial. Patients who are Hispanic, Spanish-speaking, or publicly insured are underrepresented in referrals from external hospitals to CAR-T centers. External provider implicit bias also may influence referral of these patients. Establishing partnerships between CAR-T centers and external hospital sites may improve provider familiarity, patient referral, and patient access to CAR-T clinical trials.