Racial disparities in access to alternative donor allografts persist in the era of "donors for all"

'A perfect match': how hematologists discuss donor options and risks with black and white patients considering allogeneic stem cell transplant

Patients of racial minorities have lower chance of securing a suitable donor, essential part of successful allogeneic stem cell transplant. In this simulated interview study, we sought to examine how hematologists discuss donor options and risks with patients with high-risk myeloid neoplasm considering transplant. Thirty-seven US hematologists participated (65% male; 65% white, 24% Asian, none Black), randomly assigned to meet with a Black or white patient actor. The hematologists emphasized the benefits of a full match with the white patient and high chance of securing a donor. Conversely, with the Black patient, they tended not to ask about ancestry, discuss the donor registry, race implications or challenges with donor search. Knowing the patient had children, many recommended haploidentical transplant. The unique circumstances of transplant argue for a focused communication including discussing race. While conversations should be tailored to each patient, limiting essential information on donor options may contribute to disparities.

Differences in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Severity and Its Outcomes Between Black and White Patients

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Although recent advancements in GVHD prophylaxis have resulted in successful HCT across HLA barriers and expanded access to HCT for racial minorities, less is known about how race affects the severity and outcomes of acute GVHD. This study examines differences in the clinical course of acute GVHD and the prognostic value of GVHD biomarkers for Black and White recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) database who underwent HCT between 2014 and 2021 to describe the difference in clinical course of acute GVHD and significance of GVHD biomarkers between Black and White recipients. We used propensity score matching to generate a 1:3 matched cohort of 234 Black patients and 702 White patients with similar baseline characteristics. In the first year after HCT Black patients experienced a higher cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (17% versus 12%, P = 0.050), higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 18% versus 12%, P = .009), and lower overall survival that trended toward statistical significance (73% versus 79%, P = .071) compared to White patients. The difference in NRM in the first year was even greater among Black patients who developed GVHD than White patients (24% versus 14%, P = .041). The distribution of low, intermediate, and high MAGIC biomarker scores at the time of treatment was similar across racial groups (P = .847), however, Black patients with high biomarker scores experienced significantly worse NRM than White patients (71% versus 32%, P = .010). Our data indicate that Black patients are at a higher risk of NRM following HCT, primarily from a higher incidence of severe GVHD. Serum biomarkers at treatment initiation can stratify patients for risk of NRM across races, however Black patients with high biomarker scores had a significantly greater NRM risk. These results suggest a need for strategies that mitigate the higher risk for poor GVHD outcomes among Black patients.

Real-world and clinical trial outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel across race and ethnicity

ABSTRACT

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Despite extensive data supporting its use, outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity groups are limited. Here, we report clinical outcomes with axi-cel in patients with R/R LBCL by race and ethnicity in both real-world and clinical trial settings. In the real-world setting, 1290 patients who received axi-cel between 2017 and 2020 were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database; 106 and 169 patients were included from the ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 trials, respectively. Overall survival was consistent across race/ethnicity groups. However, non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients had lower overall response rate (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.63) and lower complete response rate (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97) than NH White patients. NH Black patients also had a shorter progression-free survival vs NH White (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.90) and NH Asian patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59). NH Asian patients had a longer duration of response than NH White (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94) and Hispanic patients (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97). There was no difference in cytokine release syndrome by race/ethnicity; however, higher rates of any-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were observed in NH White patients than in other patients. These results provide important context when treating patients with R/R LBCL with CAR T-cell therapy across different racial and ethnic groups. ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: #NCT02348216 and #NCT03391466, respectively) are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Racial/ethnic disparities in availability of volunteer unrelated donors for allogeneic transplantation

ABSTRACT

Despite the global unrelated donor (URD) registry size, the degree to which URD availability is a transplant barrier is not established. We evaluated the availability of 3,843 URDs requested for 455 diverse adult patients (predominantly with acute leukemia). URDs for non-Europeans were more likely to be domestic and had markedly lower Donor Readiness scores. Of URDs requested for confirmatory HLA-typing (CT) alone (ie, without simultaneous workup), 1,894 of 3,529 (54%) were available. Availability of domestic URDs was 45%. Donor Readiness score was highly predictive of CT availability. More non-European patients (n = 120) than Europeans (n = 335) had >10 URDs requested and <5 available. Of workup requests (after CT or CT-workup), <70% (604/889 [68%]) were available. More non-Europeans had <2 URDs available. URD availability for CT was markedly worse for non-Europeans, with availabilities for African, non-Black Hispanic, and Asian patients being 150/458 (33%), 120/258 (47%), and 119/270 (44%), respectively, with further decrements in URD workup availability. Our data suggest the functional size of the URD pool is much smaller than appreciated, mandating major operational changes for transplant centers and donor registries. Likelihood of donor availability should have a high priority in donor selection. Considering patient ancestry and URD Donor Readiness scores, centers should pursue, and registries permit, simultaneous pursuit of many URDs and abandon futile searches. Patients should be informed about their likelihood of donor availability and alternative options. Finally, although registries should address high URD attrition and speed procurement, use of all HLA-disparate graft types is needed to facilitate timely transplant for all.

Improving Unrelated Donor Equity: Assessing Mismatched Donor Opportunities with Real-World Data in a Minority-Predominant Cohort

Recent advances in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis including post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and abatacept have significantly improved outcomes following HLA-mismatched allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and have tremendous potential for reducing racial disparities in donor availability. A recent small study employing bone marrow as the source of stem cells showed similar outcomes after 5/8 versus 7/8 matches and is currently being tested in a larger study using peripheral blood stem cells. In this study, we examine real-world alternative donor HSCT options for a minority-predominant cohort in the Bronx, NY, focusing on the availability of lesser-matched (5/8 to 7/8) donors. Records of patients who underwent HLA typing at Montefiore Medical Center (2019 to 2022) were reviewed. The National Marrow Donor Program registry was queried to evaluate the availability of donors with at least 99% likelihood of HLA match at various levels (5/8, 6/8, 7/8, 8/8). Two hundred forty-one patients were included, 70% were non-White. Although the availability of ≥7/8 donors was less common in non-White patients, 100% of patients from each group had at least one or more 5/8 and 6/8 HLA-matched donors and more than 80% of these patients had >100 potential 5/8 and 6/8 HLA-matched donors. There was no statistical difference by race or ethnicity in the mean number of donors at 5/8 and 6/8 HLA-match levels. We demonstrate through real-world data that patients from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds have access to 5/8 and 6/8 HLA-matched donors for allo-HSCT, potentially eliminating disparities in donor availability and allowing prioritization of other donor selection characteristics such as donor age, sex, ABO, and B leader matching. Further work is needed to study whether the use of mismatched donors offers a more potent graft-versus malignancy effect and optimal GVHD prophylaxis.

Projected Impact of Omidubicel-onlv on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (Allo-HCT) Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

In a phase III clinical trial (NCT02730299), omidubicel-onlv, a nicotinamide-modified allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell therapy, showed rapid hematopoietic and immune recovery compared with standard umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplant across all racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

A decision-tree model was used to project the effect of omidubicel-onlv availability on addressing health disparities in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) access and outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies. The model used a hypothetical population of 10,000 allo-HCT-eligible US adults, for whom matched related donors were not available. Patients received matched or mismatched unrelated donor, haploidentical, UCB transplant, or no transplant. Scenarios with omidubicel-onlv use of 0% (status quo), 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30% were modeled on the basis of proportional reductions in other allo-HCT sources or no transplant by racial/ethnic group.

RESULTS

Increased omidubicel-onlv use was associated with a higher proportion of patients undergoing allo-HCT, decreased time to allo-HCT, decreased 1-year non-relapse mortality, and increased 1-year overall survival, particularly among racial minorities. In the scenario modeling 20% omidubicel-onlv use, the proportion of Black patients receiving allo-HCT increased by 129%; increases were also observed in Asian (64%), Hispanic (45%), and other (42%) patient groups. Modeled time to allo-HCT improved among transplanted patients (23%) from 11.4 weeks to 8.8 weeks. One-year OS in the overall population increased by 3%, with improvements ranging from 3% for White patients to 5% for Black patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that broad access to omidubicel-onlv could increase access to allo-HCT and improve outcomes for patients, with the greatest benefits seen among racial/ethnic minority groups.

Utilization and outcome disparities in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the United States

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is increasingly being used in the United States (US) and across the world as a curative therapeutic option for patients with certain high-risk hematologic malignancies and non-malignant diseases. However, racial and ethnic disparities in utilization of the procedure and in outcome following transplant remain major problems. Racial and ethnic minority patients are consistently under-represented in the proportion of patients who undergo allo-HSCT in the US. The transplant outcomes in these patients are also inferior. The interrelated driving forces responsible for the differences in the utilization and transplant outcome of the medical intervention are socioeconomic status, complexity of the procedure, geographical barriers, and the results of differences in the genetics and comorbidities across different races. Bridging the disparity gaps is important not only to provide equity and inclusion in the utilization of this potentially life-saving procedure but also in ensuring that minority groups are well represented for research studies about allo-HSCT. This is required to determine interventions that may be more efficacious in particular racial and ethnic groups. Various strategies at the Federal, State, and Program levels have been designed to bridge the disparity gaps with varying successes. In this review paper, we will examine the disparities and discuss the strategies currently available to address the utilization and outcome gaps between patients of different races in the US.

Existence of HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donors Closes the Gap in Donor Availability Regardless of Recipient Ancestry

In patients without a matched sibling donor (MSD) or well-matched unrelated donor (MUD), hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can still be successful when using an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) in combination with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), abatacept, or other novel approaches. This may allow clinicians to choose a suitable donor from a wide range of donor options while optimizing other donor selection characteristics, including donor age. We hypothesized that allowing for a 5/8 HLA match level considering high-resolution matching at HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1, there is a potential to close the donor availability gap for all patients regardless of their race/ethnicity. In this work, we estimate the likelihood of matching for all racial/ethnic groups at different HLA match thresholds. Our study aimed to assess the potential for identifying an available MUD or MMUD in the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match (BTM) donor registry for 21 detailed and 5 broad racial/ethnic groups, using high-resolution HLA matching for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 at various levels (8/8, 7/8, 6/8, and 5/8). We used donor registry population data from the NMDP/BTM in 2020 and redistributed the donor registry data according to existing population ratios, accounting for demonstrated donor availability. Finally, we used a genetic model at the population level to estimate the match likelihood for detailed and broad racial/ethnic groups. Likelihood of 8/8 HLA match ranging from 16% to 74% were obtained for various detailed racial/ethnic groups with available donors age ≤35 years. When considering more mismatches in the HLA loci, registry coverage became >99% with a 5/8 HLA match level for donors of all ages or those age ≤35 years, with HLA-DPB1 T cell epitope permissive matching, or when searching for donors outside of their racial/ethnic group. Our registry models demonstrate the potential for using MMUDs at various HLA match levels to study whether this will expand access to HCT across racial/ethnic groups. Expanded donor options may erase the donor availability gap for all patients while allowing for selection of MMUDs with favorable characteristics, such as younger age.

Analysis of disparities in time to allogeneic transplantation in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia

Although alternative donors extend transplant access, whether recipient ancestry affects the time to allogeneic transplant is not established. We analyzed the likelihood of clinically significant delays to allograft by patient ancestry in 313 adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) who underwent transplantation. Non-European ancestry patients (n = 99) were more likely than Europeans (n = 214) to receive HLA-mismatched donor allografts (45% vs 24%). Overall, the median time from transplant indication to allograft was 127 days (range, 57-1683). In multivariable analysis, non-Europeans had an increased risk of prolonged indication to transplant time >180 days owing to significant delays in indication to consult >90 days and consult to transplant >120 days. Compared with recipients of HLA-matched unrelated donors (URDs), HLA-mismatched adult donor recipients were at an increased risk of delayed indication to transplant, whereas HLA-identical sibling and cord blood recipients were at a lower risk. Subanalysis showed more indication to transplant delays >180 days in non-European (44%) vs European (19%) 8/8 URD recipients. Finally, the pandemic further exacerbated delays for non-Europeans. In summary, although non-European patients with AML are less likely to receive 8/8 URDs as expected, if they do, their transplants are delayed. HLA-identical siblings and cord blood facilitate the fastest transplants regardless of patient ancestry, whereas other adult donor transplants are delayed. Strategies to mitigate referral barriers, hasten donor evaluation, and use all alternative donor sources are critical to ensure timely transplantation for patients with AML.

Refining eligibility criteria of unit selection for myeloablative cord blood transplantation in acute leukemia: Real-world experience of a referral center

The algorithm for cord blood (CB) unit selection is still somewhat ambiguous. We retrospectively analyzed 620 cases of acute leukemia between 2015 and 2020, who were treated with myeloablative single-unit umbilical CB transplantation (UCBT). We found that, when human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch was ≤3/10, CD34+ cell dosage <0.83 × 105/kg-considerably lower than prevalent guidelines-was permissible without affecting survival. Moreover, synergy between donor killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) haplotypes-B and donor-recipient HLA-C mismatch protected against relapse-related mortality. We submit that minimum required CD34+ cell dosage can possibly be relaxed to broaden access to UCBT, and donor KIR genotyping should be considered during unit selection.

An Optimized Search Prognosis Tool to Predict 8/8 HLA Allele-Matched Unrelated Donor Procurement

For patients in need of allogeneic transplantation who lack an HLA-identical sibling, an 8/8 HLA allele-matched unrelated donor (URD) is a standard alternative. However, delays in URD procurement can adversely impact patient care. Recipient genotype and search assessment (MSKv1.0)-based tools can predict search prognosis for many, but both tools have lower performance in non-European ancestry patients. Using the MSKv1.0 tool, we analyzed searches from 1530 potential allograft recipients (including 863 who underwent transplantation) with the aim of creating an optimized MSKv2.0 search prognosis tool that can classify a URD search as either Good or Poor with a high level of accuracy while also limiting an ambiguous Fair search prognosis regardless of patient ancestry. By MSKv2.0, the 8/8 URD search prognosis distribution was 57% Good, 21% Fair, and 22% Poor in Europeans and 15% Good, 21% Fair, and 63% Poor in non-Europeans. Importantly, compared to MSKv1.0, the likelihood of Fair categorization was reduced to <25% with comparable Fair rates (P = .847) in both European and non-European groups. Moreover, all patients with an MSKv2.0 Good prognosis had an 8/8 URD identified, and almost all of those who underwent transplantation had an 8/8 URD (Europeans, 99%; non-Europeans, 98%; P = .504). The MSKv2.0 tool also was highly accurate at classifying Poor searches, with <10% identifying an 8/8 URD, and almost all patients who underwent transplantation (Europeans, 95%; non-Europeans, 96%) receiving an alternative donor. Using preliminary search results, MSKv2.0 accurately classifies patients by likelihood of 8/8 URD procurement, greatly facilitating triage to 8/8 URD (Good prognosis) or alternative donor (Poor prognosis) transplantations.

Why We Swab: A library of stories in stem cell donation

BACKGROUND

Stories are powerful in their ability to disseminate information in a meaningful way. We hypothesized that a stem cell donation story library optimized for social media could support the education and recruitment of committed unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors from needed demographic groups.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed Why We Swab, a library of stories on stem cell donation (facebook.com/WhyWeSwab; instagram.com/WhyWeSwab; twitter.com/WhyWeSwab), and evaluated its impact across social and traditional media as well as on eligible potential donors' knowledge and attitudes towards donation.

RESULTS

As of December 2021, the library included 28 story arcs featuring 45 storytellers from diverse ancestral backgrounds, including 8 donor-recipient stories. Overall, the stories reached >92,000 people across social media. Notably, stories were republished by 18 print/ broadcast media outlets in Canada and by major medical organizations. A series of stories shown to 33 eligible potential donors improved mean total scores on a donation knowledge test (64% to 85%, p < 0.001), reduced mean ambivalence scale scores (3.85 to 2.70, p < 0.001), and improved participants' willingness to register as donors (45% to 73%, p < 0.005). Data are also shown demonstrating that stakeholders valued the library and that its deployment was associated with improved donor recruitment outcomes in Canada.

CONCLUSION

Why We Swab is accessible and relevant to a wide audience, including stem cell donor registries and recruitment organizations seeking to improve their recruitment efforts as well as to blood and organ & tissue donation organizations who can adapt the Why We Swab model to their audiences.