Sitaxentan-related acute liver failure in a patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data

BACKGROUND

Liver injury is the hallmark adverse reaction of endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA). Since the first drug, bosentan has been widely used in clinical practice, hepatotoxicity has been accompanied by the history of ERA. The new ERA has been proven to have a lower liver risk but the current research findings are inconsistent. ERA-based targeted drug combinations are commonly used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, where the risk of liver injury is difficult to estimate.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the correlation between ERA and different ERA combination regimens with liver injury in the real world.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System (Food and Drug Administration AERS, FAERS).

METHODS

The study used proportional imbalance and Bayesian analysis to mine FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 to determine the association of three ERAs with liver injury and to further mine the risk of liver injury due to the combination of ERAs with other targeted drugs. In addition, we analyzed the onset time, mortality, and hospitalization rate of liver injury caused by different ERA combination regimens.

RESULTS

We screened out 3581 ERA-related liver injury events, of which bosentan (59.82%) had the largest number of cases. The patients with liver injury were mainly female (60.63%), and the age was concentrated between 61 and 75 years (26.75%). According to different signal mining methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR; 3.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.23-3.53), proportional reporting ratio (PRR; 3.22, χ2 = 37.84), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; 1.68, 95% confidence interval = 1.61), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; 3.21, 95% confidence interval = 3.09), bosentan had the strongest association with liver injury compared to ambrisentan and macitentan. Furthermore, bosentan + sildenafil [ROR (2.52, 95% confidence interval = 2.23-2.84), PRR (2.44, χ2 = 15.92), BCPNN (1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.14), MGPS (2.44, 95% confidence interval = 2.21)], bosentan + epoprostenol [ROR (5.39, 95% confidence interval = 4.29-6.77), PRR (4.94, χ2 = 65.18), BCPNN (2.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.83), MGPS (4.94, 95% confidence interval = 4.08)], bosentan + iloprost [ROR (2.70, 95% confidence interval = 2.11-3.45), PRR (2.61, χ2 = 31.03), BCPNN (1.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.08), MGPS (2.61, 95% confidence interval = 2.12)] had a higher risk of liver injury caused by the three ERA combination regimens. The median time to onset of hepatotoxicity associated with all ERA combination regimens was 259 days (interquartile range: 58-716.5 days). Finally, the hospitalization rate for patients experiencing hepatotoxicity with ERA combination regimens was 47.86% and the mortality rate was 12.67%.

CONCLUSION

By mining the FAERS, we analyzed and compared the risk of liver injury related to different ERA and ERA combination regimens, and the onset time and adverse reaction outcomes of all ERA combination regimens. According to the results of the study, bosentan had the highest risk of liver injury and the combination regimens bosentan + sildenafil, bosentan + epoprostenol, and bosentan + iloprost had a stronger risk of liver injury. From the early stages of treatment, we need to regularly monitor the liver function of patients, especially for females and the elderly, and discontinue the suspected drug as soon as the liver injury occurs.

Microphysiological Models for Mechanistic-Based Prediction of Idiosyncratic DILI

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major contributor to high attrition rates among candidate and market drugs and a key regulatory, industry, and global health concern. While acute and dose-dependent DILI, namely, intrinsic DILI, is predictable and often reproducible in preclinical models, the nature of idiosyncratic DILI (iDILI) limits its mechanistic understanding due to the complex disease pathogenesis, and recapitulation using in vitro and in vivo models is extremely challenging. However, hepatic inflammation is a key feature of iDILI primarily orchestrated by the innate and adaptive immune system. This review summarizes the in vitro co-culture models that exploit the role of the immune system to investigate iDILI. Particularly, this review focuses on advancements in human-based 3D multicellular models attempting to supplement in vivo models that often lack predictability and display interspecies variations. Exploiting the immune-mediated mechanisms of iDILI, the inclusion of non-parenchymal cells in these hepatoxicity models, namely, Kupffer cells, stellate cells, dendritic cells, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, introduces heterotypic cell-cell interactions and mimics the hepatic microenvironment. Additionally, drugs recalled from the market in the US between 1996-2010 that were studies in these various models highlight the necessity for further harmonization and comparison of model characteristics. Challenges regarding disease-related endpoints, mimicking 3D architecture with different cell-cell contact, cell source, and the underlying multi-cellular and multi-stage mechanisms are described. It is our belief that progressing our understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of iDILI will provide mechanistic clues and a method for drug safety screening to better predict liver injury in clinical trials and post-marketing.

New Drugs and Therapies in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a chronic, progressive disorder of the pulmonary vasculature with associated pulmonary and cardiac remodeling. PAH was a uniformly fatal disease until the late 1970s, but with the advent of targeted therapies, the life expectancy of patients with PAH has now considerably improved. Despite these advances, PAH inevitably remains a progressive disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Thus, there is still an unmet need for the development of new drugs and other interventional therapies for the treatment of PAH. One shortcoming of currently approved vasodilator therapies is that they do not target or reverse the underlying pathogenesis of the disease process itself. A large body of evidence has evolved in the past two decades clarifying the role of genetics, dysregulation of growth factors, inflammatory pathways, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, sex hormones, neurohormonal pathways, and iron deficiency in the pathogenesis of PAH. This review focuses on newer targets and drugs that modify these pathways as well as novel interventional therapies in PAH.

A narrative review on adverse effects of dasatinib with a focus on pharmacotherapy of dasatinib-induced pulmonary toxicities

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a myeloproliferative disorder caused by the over activity of BCR-ABL1 (breakpoint cluster region-Abelson), has been successfully treated by Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). While imatinib is known as the first-line treatment of CML, in some cases other TKIs including dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib may be preferred. Dasatinib, a second-generation TKI, inhibits multiple family kinases including BCR-ABL, SRC family kinases, receptor kinases, and TEC family kinases. It is effective against most imatinib-resistant cases except T315I mutation. Despite the superiority of dasatinib in its hematologic and cytogenetic responses in CML compared to imatinib, its potentially harmful pulmonary complications including pleural effusion (PE) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may limit its use. Appropriate management of these serious adverse reactions is critical in both improving the quality of life and the outcome of the patient. In this narrative review, we will scrutinize the pulmonary complications of dasatinib and focus on the management of these toxicities.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension specific therapy: The old and the new

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a vascular disorder associated with high morbidity and mortality rate and is characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling and increased pulmonary vascular resistance, ultimately resulting in right ventricular failure and death. Over the past few decades, significant advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension have occured. This has led to the development of disease specific treatment including prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. These therapies significantly improve exercise capacity, quality of life, pulmonary hemodynamics, but none of the current treatments are actually curative and long-term prognosis remains poor. Thus, there is a clear need to develop new therapies. Several potential pharmacologic agents for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension are under clinical development and some promising results with these treatments have been reported. These agents include tyrosine protein kinase inhibitors, rho-kinase inhibitors, synthetically produced vasoactive intestinal peptide, antagonists of the 5-HT2 receptors, and others. This article will review several of these promising new therapies and will discuss the current evidence regarding their potential benefit in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Endothelin: 30 Years From Discovery to Therapy

Discovered in 1987 as a potent endothelial cell-derived vasoconstrictor peptide, endothelin-1 (ET-1), the predominant member of the endothelin peptide family, is now recognized as a multifunctional peptide with cytokine-like activity contributing to almost all aspects of physiology and cell function. More than 30 000 scientific articles on endothelin were published over the past 3 decades, leading to the development and subsequent regulatory approval of a new class of therapeutics-the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). This article reviews the history of the discovery of endothelin and its role in genetics, physiology, and disease. Here, we summarize the main clinical trials using ERAs and discuss the role of endothelin in cardiovascular diseases such as arterial hypertension, preecclampsia, coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) caused by spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), Takotsubo syndrome, and heart failure. We also discuss how endothelins contributes to diabetic kidney disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, as well as cancer, immune disorders, and allograft rejection (which all involve ET_A autoantibodies), and neurological diseases. The application of ERAs, dual endothelin receptor/angiotensin receptor antagonists (DARAs), selective ET_B agonists, novel biologics such as receptor-targeting antibodies, or immunization against ET_A receptors holds the potential to slow the progression or even reverse chronic noncommunicable diseases. Future clinical studies will show whether targeting endothelin receptors can prevent or reduce disability from disease and improve clinical outcome, quality of life, and survival in patients.

New pharmacotherapy options for pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Epoprostenol was the first targeted therapy available for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since then great advances in our knowledge of the disease have been made and the spectrum of therapeutic options for PAH has expanded. After an overview of current available treatments, this article describes the new pharmacotherapy options and their place in the management of PAH.

AREAS COVERED

This paper is based on a literature search and the review of studies published on PAH pharmacotherapy using the MEDLINE database.

EXPERT OPINION

The last decade has been particularly important in PAH management with the emergence of six new molecules, the development of novel routes of administration and improvement of pharmacokinetics. Moreover, pediatric formulations have been developed. However, further research is required to inform clinicians regarding optimal choices of combination therapies (progressive add-on therapy or upfront combination therapy, selection of associated molecules regarding the patient's profile...), to continue to improve the quality of life of patients with new drugs and to reach the ultimate goal of curing the disease.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension: recent knowledge in pathogenesis and overview of clinical assessment

Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension are cardiopulmonary complications, which are not infrequently seen in patients with liver disease and/or portal hypertension. These entities are both clinically and pathophysiologically different: the hepatopulmonary syndrome is characterized by abnormal pulmonary vasodilation and right-to-left shunting resulting in gas exchange abnormalities, whereas portopulmonary hypertension is caused by pulmonary artery vasoconstriction leading to hemodynamic failure. As both hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension are associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality, and as these patients are commonly asymptomatic, all liver transplantation candidates should be actively screened for the presence of these two complications. The aim of is this review is to provide an overview on the hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension with primary focus on diagnosis and recent knowledge regarding pathogenesis and therapeutic targets.

Endothelin Blockade in Diabetic Kidney Disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains the most common cause of chronic kidney disease and multiple therapeutic agents, primarily targeted at the renin-angiotensin system, have been assessed. Their only partial effectiveness in slowing down progression to end-stage renal disease, points out an evident need for additional effective therapies. In the context of diabetes, endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been implicated in vasoconstriction, renal injury, mesangial proliferation, glomerulosclerosis, fibrosis and inflammation, largely through activation of its endothelin A (ET_A) receptor. Therefore, endothelin receptor antagonists have been proposed as potential drug targets. In experimental models of DKD, endothelin receptor antagonists have been described to improve renal injury and fibrosis, whereas clinical trials in DKD patients have shown an antiproteinuric effect. Currently, its renoprotective effect in a long-time clinical trial is being tested. This review focuses on the localization of endothelin receptors (ET_A and ET_B) within the kidney, as well as the ET-1 functions through them. In addition, we summarize the therapeutic benefit of endothelin receptor antagonists in experimental and human studies and the adverse effects that have been described.

Clinical pharmacology of endothelin receptor antagonists used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating life-threatening disorder characterized by elevated pulmonary vascular resistance leading to elevated pulmonary arterial pressures, right ventricular failure, and ultimately death. Vascular endothelial cells mainly produce and secrete endothelin (ET-1) in vessels that lead to a potent and long-lasting vasoconstrictive effect in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Along with its strong vasoconstrictive action, ET-1 can promote smooth muscle cell proliferation. Thus, ET-1 blockers have attracted attention as an antihypertensive drug, and the ET-1 signaling system has paved a new therapeutic avenue for the treatment of PAH. We outline the current understanding of not only the pathogenic role played by ET-1 signaling systems in the pathogenesis of PH but also the clinical pharmacology of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) used in the treatment of PAH.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of macitentan , a novel endothelin receptor antagonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disorder of the pulmonary vasculature characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure eventually leading to right-sided heart failure and premature death. Macitentan is an oral, once-daily, dual endothelin (ET)A and ETB receptor antagonist with high affinity and sustained receptor binding that was approved in the USA, Europe, Canada, and Switzerland for the treatment of PAH.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of macitentan and its drug interaction potential based on preclinical and clinical data.

EXPERT OPINION

Up to date, macitentan is the only registered treatment for PAH that significantly reduced morbidity and mortality as a combined endpoint in a long-term event-driven study. The safety profile of macitentan is favorable with respect to hepatic safety and edema/fluid retention and may be better than that of other ET receptor antagonists such as bosentan and ambrisentan. The PK profile supports a once-a-day dosing regimen. Macitentan has limited interactions with other drugs. Based on these characteristics macitentan is an important new addition to the treatment of PAH.

Effectiveness of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy for portopulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Portopulmonary hypertension is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy is efficacious in other causes of WHO group I pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy in patients with portopulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective cohort study that included patients with a diagnosis of portopulmonary hypertension was performed. The primary outcome was change in pulmonary vascular resistance after six months of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy. A secondary evaluation investigated the effect on other hemodynamic measurements, 6 min walk distance, functional class, safety outcomes and survival.

RESULTS

Of 1385 patients screened, 25 patients with portopulmonary hypertension were identified, of whom 20 received a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor. After six months, there was a significant decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (-236 dyn • s • cm(-5) [95% CI -343 dyn • s • cm(-5) to -130 dyn • s • cm(-5)]; P<0.001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (-8.9 mmHg [95% CI -13.7 mmHg to -4.2 mmHg]; P=0.001) and an increase in Fick cardiac output (0.9 L/min [95% CI 0.1 L/min to 1.6 L/min]; P=0.02). There was no change in 6 min walk distance. The proportion of subjects with a WHO functional class III or IV was significantly reduced at six months compared with baseline (18% versus 61%; P=0.002). Safety outcomes did not reveal any adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy improved hemodynamics and functional class at six months in a cohort of patients with portopulmonary hypertension.

Ironic case of hepatic dysfunction following the global withdrawal of sitaxentan

A patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to systemic sclerosis was successfully treated with sitaxentan prior to its worldwide withdrawal (because of hepatotoxicity concerns), but then ironically experienced acute hepatic dysfunction during substitute bosentan therapy, and was eventually stabilised on a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor.

An update on the use of ambrisentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension

The development of effective oral treatments that are capable of modulating the activity of endothelin receptor 1 (ET-1) represents a significant milestone in the field of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Randomized clinical trials confirm that endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) treatments confer significant improvements on important clinical endpoints, such as exercise capacity, functional class, quality of life and pulmonary hemodynamics. Moreover, ERAs may prevent or delay clinical worsening and retard disease progression.

Ambrisentan is a propanoic acid-based ERA, showing preferential affinity for the type A ET-1 over the type B receptor. It provides another valuable, effective treatment option in PAH. Two large, randomized-placebo controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy of ambrisentan in PAH at improving exercise tolerance as measured by the 6 min walk distance. Additional secondary measures of improvement including time to clinical worsening, survival, functional class, quality of life and hemodynamic variables have been reported in clinical trials. A favorably low incidence of aminotransferase elevation indicating lower hepatic toxicity than other ERAs has been observed. Ambrisentan can be safely administered with warfarin or sildenafil without the need for dose adjustment of either therapy. A once daily oral medication with relatively few side effects is an attractive option, especially as the use of therapies in combination continues to increase. Long-term data and hemodynamic data confirm the benefits can be compared with other ERAs with fewer drug–drug interactions and a better liver safety profile.

The pharmacological treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening and progressive disease of various origins characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling that leads to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, most often resulting in right-sided heart failure. The most common symptom at presentation is breathlessness, with impaired exercise capacity as a hallmark of the disease. Advances in understanding the pathobiology over the last 2 decades have led to therapies (endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and prostacyclins or analogs) initially directed at reversing the pulmonary vasoconstriction and more recently directed toward reversing endothelial cell dysfunction and smooth muscle cell proliferation. Despite these advances, disease progression is common even with use of combination regimens targeting multiple mechanistic pathways. Overall 5-year survival for PAH has increased significantly from approximately 30% in the 1980s to approximately 60% at present, yet remains abysmal. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action, clinical data, and regulatory histories of approved PAH therapies and describes the latest agents in late-stage clinical development.

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with targeted therapies

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disorder characterized by progressive obliteration of the pulmonary microvasculature that results in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and premature death. Although no cure exists for PAH, improved understanding of the pathobiological mechanisms of this disease has resulted in the development of effective therapies that target specific aberrant pathways. Agents that modulate abnormalities in the prostacyclin, endothelin, and nitric oxide pathways have been shown in randomized, controlled studies to confer improvements in functional status, pulmonary hemodynamics, and possibly even slow disease progression. Several additional pathways believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of PAH have been identified as potentially useful therapeutic targets and a number of investigative approaches focusing on these targets are in active development. In this Review, we highlight the pharmacological agents currently available for the treatment of PAH and discuss potential novel strategies.